Establishment and characterization of two human breast carcinoma cell lines by spontaneous immortalization: Discordance between Estrogen, Progesterone and HER2/neu receptors of breast carcinoma tissues with derived cell lines
© Kamalidehghan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 August 2012
Accepted: 17 October 2012
Published: 29 October 2012
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women throughout the world. Therefore, established cell lines are widely used as in vitro experimental models in cancer research.
Two continuous human breast cell lines, designated MBC1 and MBC2, were successfully established and characterized from invasive ductal breast carcinoma tissues of Malaysian patients. MBC1 and MBC2 have been characterized in terms of morphology analysis, population doubling time, clonogenic formation, wound healing assay, invasion assay, cell cycle, DNA profiling, fluorescence immunocytochemistry, Western blotting and karyotyping.
MBC1 and MBC2 exhibited adherent monolayer epithelial morphology at a passage number of 150. Receptor status of MBC1 and MBC2 show (ER+, PR+, HER2+) and (ER+, PR-, HER2+), respectively. These results are in discordance with histopathological studies of the tumoral tissues, which were triple negative and (ER-, PR-, HER2+) for MBC1 and MBC2, respectively. Both cell lines were capable of growing in soft agar culture, which suggests their metastatic potential. The MBC1 and MBC2 metaphase spreads showed an abnormal karyotype, including hyperdiploidy and complex rearrangements with modes of 52–58 chromosomes per cell.
Loss or gain in secondary properties, deregulation and specific genetic changes possibly conferred receptor changes during the culturing of tumoral cells. Thus, we hypothesize that, among heterogenous tumoral cells, only a small minority of ER+/PR+/HER2+ and ER+/PR-/HER2+ cells with lower energy metabolism might survive and adjust easily to in vitro conditions. These cell lines will pave the way for new perspectives in genetic and biological investigations, drug resistance and chemotherapy studies, and would serve as prototype models in Malaysian breast carcinogenesis investigations.
KeywordsMalaysian breast cell lines Estrogen (ER) Progesterone (PR) and HER2/neu Clonogenic assay Invasive ductal breast carcinoma tissues DNA profiling
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women throughout the world. The number of newly-diagnosed cases in 2008 was approximately 1.38 million, and the number of deaths was more than 460,000 worldwide .
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Malaysian women. The peak age for cancer cases among the three major ethnic groups, namely Malay, Chinese and Indian was between 40 to 49 years . Malay women presented larger tumours, in which 50% to 60% were at the later stages (3 and 4), compared to other ethnic groups .
Though advances in breast cancer detection and treatment have contributed to improving the rate of survival, mortality rates remains significantly high. The establishment of breast cancer cell lines is an important tool to understand biological processes involved in this disease, as well as the identification of potential therapeutic targets .
Cell lines are used to determine key initiation and progression factors in order to better understand a disease. They are also used to predict the efficacy of novel therapeutic compounds. However, the cell lines currently used for breast cancer are mostly derived from Caucasians or African-Americans. Though breast cancer cell lines are easy to handle and replaced from frozen stocks, they are prone to genotypic and phenotypic drifts during consecutive cultures [5, 6].
Most in vitro studies using a few well-characterized breast cancer cell lines such as MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, T-47D and ZR-75-30 have been established for over 30 years. These cell lines were derived from tumor metastases especially aspirate or pleural effusions but not from primary breast tumors [7–9].
The main objective of this study was to establish and characterize two new immortalised Malaysian breast cancer cell lines, which are derived from two fresh primary invasive ductal breast carcinoma tissues.
Materials and Methods
Cancer cell isolation and cell culture
Ethics approval and patient informed consent including consent to participate in the study and consent to publish was obtained for the present study in accordance to the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) Research and Medical Ethics Committee (Approval No. FF-166-2004).
Two invasive ductal breast carcinoma tissues, one from a Malay patient with triple negative (ER-, PR-, HER2-) tumor and another from a Chinese patient with (ER-, PR-, HER2+) tumor, were collected from Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (HUKM). After surgical removal, a portion of the primary breast tissues were immediately placed in FBS-free DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and were minced and scraped to isolate cancer cells, in accordance to the manufacturer’s instructions of the Cancer Cell Isolation Kit (Panomics, USA). The cells were cultured in six-well culture plates supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 3.7 g/L sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) with a pH of 7.4 in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C (IR Sensor, Sanyo). Both cell lines were subcultured and then used to determine the characteristics of the established cell lines.
The purity of the epithelial phenotype was confirmed by staining with a pan-cytokeratin antiserum (FITC conjugate; Dako, Denmark).
Both MBC1 and MBC2 cell lines were cultured on coverslips in 6-well plates and incubated overnight until confluent. The coverslips were washed with PBS and fixed with a fixative; then stained with DAPI and kept in the dark place for 10 min. After that, the coverslips were washed with distilled water and dried to detect mycoplasma using a fluorescence microscope (Leica, Germany).
Population doubling time (PDT)
A total of 2 × 105 cells/ml of MBC1 and MBC2 cell lines at passage 30 were cultivated for a period of 3 days (24, 48 and 72 hrs). Cell numbers were determined every 24 hrs using a Neubauer improved haematocytometer (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and cell numbers were counted in triplicate. Population doubling time was calculated using an online algorithm software provided at http://www.doubling-time.com.
A two-layer technique was used, with a base layer consisting of 1% agar (BST TechLab, Malaysia), and a second layer containing cells with 0.7% agar. Briefly, equal volumes of the base agar (melted in a microwave oven and cooled to 40°C in a water bath) containing 1% agar along with 2X DMEM containing 20% FCS were mixed to obtain 0.5% agar and 1X DMEM with 10% FCS. Subsequently, 1.5 ml of the mixed solutions was added to a petri dish (35 mm). The second layer, 3 ml of 2X DMEM (20% FCS) and 3 ml of 0.7% agar were added to a centrifuge falcon tube and mixed gently. The cells were trypsinised and counted to a ratio of 5 × 103 cells per plate. After that, 1.5 ml was added to each petri dish (35 mm) that was covered with the earlier agar base. The plates were incubated for 14 days at 37°C and 5% CO2. Plates were then stained with 0.5 ml of 0.005% crystal violet for 2 hrs and colonies were counted using an inverted microscope Nikon Eclipse TS100 camera (Nikon DS-Fi1). The cloning efficiency (CE) was calculated as the number of colonies divided by the number of cells added to each plate.
Wound healing assay (Migration assay)
The cell lines were seeded in 6-well plates until the cells reach confluence. Then, a straight scratch was made using a yellow plastic pipette tip. Next, the plates were rinsed twice with PBS to remove floating cells. The underside of the dish was marked to indicate the wounded area where the initial photos were taken, which allowed the imaging of both wound edges using the 10X objective at 6, 12, 18, 23 and 25 hrs. Subsequential images were periodically recorded with an inverted phase microscope Nikon Eclipse TS100 camera (Nikon DS-Fi1). The migration of cells across the wounds was expressed as the percentage of wound closure: Wound closure (%) = [(Initial areat0 - Final areatf)/Initial areat0] ×100.
Matrigel invasion assay
The in vitro invasion assay was performed using Bio-Coat Matrigel invasion assay system (BD Biosciences, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Invaded cells were counted under a light microscope Nikon E600. The percentage of the invasion capability of the cell lines was calculated as follows: Invasion (%) =Number of cells attached to the lower side of the filter/total number of cells × 100.
Genomic DNA preparation and PCR amplification
The genomic DNA from the cell lines was extracted using a Qiagen kit (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA yields were quantified by Nano-drop (Thermo Nanodrop 2000) and 1% agarose (Roche, Germany) gel electrophoresis to determine the integrity of extracted DNA. The details of the primer pairs for amplification of all 13 CODIS STR alleles and Amelogenin in this study was assessed according to the protocol previously described .
Non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
To achieve adequate resolution for the separation of the different STRs and Amelogenin alleles, large non-denaturing 10% polyacrylamide gels were used, as explained previously .
After protein extraction from the cell lines using protein extraction buffer (Pierce, USA), 30 μg of proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE (25 mA; 2 hrs). Proteins were transferred to PVDF (Pierce, USA) membranes using a Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad, USA) at 15 V, 95 mA, for 1 hour. The PVDF membrane was blocked using Blocker™ Casein (Pierce, USA) for 1 hour at room temperature and then washed twice using TBST. The membranes were then incubated at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies, estrogen mouse monoclonal antibody (1:1000; DAKO, Denmark), progesterone mouse monoclonal antibody (1:1000; DAKO, Denmark), HER2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:500; DAKO, Denmark) and β-actin mouse monoclonal antibody (1:10000; DAKO, Denmark). The membranes were then incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (i-DNA, USA) at a ratio of 1:1000 and then washed twice with TBST for 10 minutes three times on an orbital shaker. Then, blots were developed using the BCIP/NBT (Santa Cruz, USA) solution for a period of 5–30 minutes to detect the target protein band as a precipitated dark blue colour.
Fluorescence immunocytochemistry of ER, PR and HER2
5×103 cells were seeded on coverslips in 6-well plates and incubated at 37°C in a humidified CO2 incubator. The cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 700 μL of 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde for 15 min at RT and then the cells were washed with PBS. Then, 700 μl of antigen retrieval buffer (100 mM Tris, 5% (w/v) urea, pH 9.5) was added to the wells for 10 min at 95°C and washed twice with PBS. Next, 700 μl of permeabilisation buffer (0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) was added to the cells for 15 minutes at RT and then washed with PBS. The Blocking buffer (2% BSA) was added for 2 hrs and then washed with PBS. The primary antibodies (DAKO, Denmark) for estrogen, progesterone and HER2 was added at a ratio of 1:35, 1:50 and 1:250, respectively and left overnight, followed by washing with PBS. The goat anti-mouse FITC secondary antibody (i-DNA, USA) for ER and PR and the goat anti-rabbit FITC secondary antibody (i-DNA, USA) for HER2 were added for 1 hour at RT, incubated away from light and then washed twice with PBS. Finally, mounting buffer (Glycerol: PBS; 9:1) was used to mount coverslips on the slides to visualise ER, PR and HER2 expression under a fluorescent microscope (Leica, Germany).
Determination of S-phase by the PI
Both cell lines were harvested and washed with 1X PBS; then, the cell pellets were fixed with pre-stored 90% ethanol at −20°C and were then incubated overnight at −20°C (0.5 ml). After incubation, cells were spun down at 800 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was carefully discarded and the cells were resuspended by tapping until the pellet was fully dissolved. The cells were then washed in 1X PBS at 2000 rpm for 5 min. Again, supernatant was carefully discarded and the cells resuspended in 450 μl of pre-warmed 1X PBS and 25 μl of 10 mg/ml RNase at 37°C. After that, 50 μl of 1 mg/ml propidium iodide solution (PI) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added and mixed well in an incubator for 30 min at 37°C. Finally, the stained samples were analysed using a FACS LSR FORTESSA flowcytometer which excites at 488 nm. The proliferation index (P.I.) was calculated by following formula P.I. = (S+G2M)/G0G1.
The cell lines were seeded in DMEM medium to reach 70% confluent. Then, 50 μl of 10 μg/ml colcemid (GIBCO, USA) was added to the culture medium in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37Â°C for 2 hrs. Both media and trypsinised cells were centrifuged at 900 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was decanted and the pellet was dispersed by tapping gently. Five ml of pre-warmed hypotonic solution (0.4% KCl and 0.4% Sodium Citrate; 1:1) were added drop by drop and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Ten drops of fresh cold fixative methanol (Merck, Germany) and acetic acid (Merck, Germany) with a ratio of 3:1 were added while gently mixing. The tube was placed on ice for 15 min and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was re-washed with 5 ml fixative. After that, the supernatant was decanted and 200 μl of fixative was added. Next, a maximum of 3 drops of the suspended cells were dropped carefully from a height of approximately 0.5 meters onto the slide, and left at room temperature overnight to dry. The slides were stained with Giemsa (GIBCO, USA) working solution for 3–5 min and rinsed with distilled water. The slides were air-dried and then analysed.
Analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute 2003). The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. It was analysed using the ANOVA procedure of SAS. Significant differences were further separated using Duncan’s multiple range test. Differences with a value of p<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Histological examination of the breast tissues showed that ER, PR and HER2/neu status of tumoral tissue for MBC1 was ER-, PR- and HER2- (Triple negative), while for MBC2 was ER-, PR- and HER2+ (Data not shown).
Morphology and culture of primary breast cell lines
Wound healing assay (Migration assay)
Matrigel invasion assay
Population doubling time (PDT)
DNA-profiling and amelogenin
Allele assignment analysis of the amplified STR Loci and Amelogenin for the MBC1 and MBC2 Cell Lines
Cell cycle analysis
Comparison of DNA ploidy and cell cycle measurements of the MBC1 and MBC2 cell lines
Proliferation Index (P.I.)
Both MBC1 and MBC2 are the first breast cancer cell lines established from Malaysian primary breast cancer tissues through spontaneous immortalization. The established cell lines grow as monolayers, adherent with consistent morphologically during subsequent cultures up to 150 passages, without any changes in the epithelial morphology such as MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. According to data on other human primary cells, the senescence period of cells undergoing cycle arrest varies from 1 to 8 weeks . However, both MBC1 and MBC2 cell lines bypassed this critical phase spontaneously after 4–5 weeks.
The MBC1 and MBC2 cell lines were able to grow in a defined DMEM medium  without any extra essential components, elements, or hormones. This is in contrast to for example, MCF-10A cell line requiring cholera toxin; MCF-7 and T-47D needing bovine insulin; and MDA-MB-435S needing ATCC-formulated Leibovitz’s L-15 Medium with bovine insulin and glutathione for growth [7, 9, 13, 14].
The more established breast cancer cell lines such as MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 were derived from malignant effusions  which may genetically differ from the original tumour [16, 17]. However, the breast cancer cells, MBC1 and MBC2, were derived from primary infiltrating ductal breast tumours, the most frequently observed histological type . Cells derived from primary breast tumours have a lower chance of establishment compared to cell lines derived from metastatic sites or pleural effusion .
The PDT of the MBC1 cells (30.14 hrs) is comparable with the established Italian BRC-230 breast cancer cell line  and French human breast cell line VHB-1  with the PDT of 30.5 and 30 hrs, respectively; while the PDT of MBC2 (35.6 hrs) is similar to the Chinese BC-019, BC-020 breast cancer cell lines with the PDT of 36 hrs and 35 hrs, respectively . The PDT of MBC1 and MBC2 is higher than the Italian breast cancer cell lines MAST, MA2 and MA3 with a PDT of 68, 70 and 78 hrs ; the human breast cancer cell lines UACC-812 and UACC-893  with a doubling time of 100 hrs; the cell lines ZR-75-1, ZR-75-27, and ZR-75-30 from the malignant effusions of breast cancer with PDT of 80 hrs, 144 hrs and 110 hrs, respectively . According to the results obtained by other researchers, one of the main reasons for the different PDTs of cell lines is the differences in cellular content rather than differences in the rates of proliferation . The enhancement of the population doubling in vitro in the MBC1 and MBC2 human breast cell lines may be due to the existence and activity of tumourigenic stem cells  or most likely arises from the selection of faster-growing subclones from an initially heterogeneous population through frequent and incomplete trypsinisation of the cultures .
Both MBC1 and MBC2 cell lines produced a colony size of approximately 95–110 μm in diameter after day 14 on soft agar. Depending on the cell line and incubation time, different colony sizes have been reported. For instances, MCF-7 cell line forms 75–100 μm colonies after 11 days of growth and 100–200 μm in diameter by 21 days; T-47D cells form well-defined colonies with diameters of 80 μm by day 14 and 120 μm by day 21; MaTu cells grow well in soft agar with colony sizes of 50–75 μm diameters and sometimes greater than 100 μm diameters; MT-1 cells grow rapidly into colonies typically 70 μm in diameter by 11 days. However, some cell lines such as MT-3 and HS578T do not grow well in soft agar and therefore form only small colonies in the plate while some others like MC4000 cells produced no colony growth in soft agar .
Wound healing assay showed lower growth rate of the MBC2 cells compared to the MBC1 and MCF-7 as a control. The MBC1 cell line had similar growth rates with the control cell line MCF-7 in wound healing assay.
The results of entire 13 CODIS core STR loci were compared with the well-characterised and validated references provided by ATCC and JCRB, and those previously reported . The two established cell lines have neither homology to each other nor with other STR-profiled breast cell lines, demonstrating the lack of any cross-contamination of cell lines with other studied cell lines such as MCF-7 , MDA-MB-231 , HeLa, HepG2, KB and MRC-5 . DNA profiling using STR markers also confirmed the gender of tumour origin of MBC1 and MBC2 cell lines.
Expression studies revealed remarkable expression of HER2 protein in both established cell lines. The MBC1 cell line was also shown to be ER+/PR+ while the MBC2 was ER+/PR- based on mRNA expression profiling. However, the tumour origins were shown ER-/PR-/HER2- and ER-/PR-/HER2+ for the MBC1 and MBC2 cells, respectively. This may be due to a gain in secondary properties after culturing or that the MBC1 and MBC2 cells were derived from a small minority of ER+/PR+/HER2+ and ER+/PR-/HER2+ cells, respectively. The mechanism of this gain or loss during carcinogenesis is largely unknown but a very feasible hypothesis suggests a possible relationship between such deregulation and specific genetic changes .
Hence, these changes could be attributed to the Warburg effect, defined as an increased dependence on glycolysis for ATP synthesis, even in the presence of abundant oxygen, instead of a cell using the more effective pathway of OXPHOS . The Warburg effect has been consistently observed in a wide spectrum of human cancers, and has been directly linked to the activation of oncogenes, and loss of tumor suppressor genes, which result in the deregulated conversion of glucose to lactate. Among the possible mechanisms, mitochondrial malfunction and hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment are considered two major factors contributing to the Warburg effect [31, 32].
The MBC1 and MBC2 cells showed an SPF of 30.12% and 16.76% with proliferation index (PI) of 0.61 and 0.32, respectively, indicating a proportion of MBC2 cells were arrested in the G0/G1 phase, delaying the progression of the cell cycle and inhibiting cell proliferation compared to the MBC1.
The karyology study of the MBC1 and MBC2 cells demonstrated hyperdiploidy and complex rearrangement of their chromosomes. The fractured chromosomes were observed in different numbers in the MBC1 and MBC2. The hyperdiploidy (> 50 chromosomes) may arise from the fracture of the chromosomes. Cytogenetic analysis of MBC1 and MBC2 revealed an extensively rearranged hyperdiploid karyotype with unidentified chromosomes and a modal chromosome number of 52–58.
Receptor changes may be due to loss or gain in secondary properties, activation of cancer stem cells and unknown specific genetic changes in tumoral cells. Regardless of receptor status, we hypothesize that, among heterogenous tumoral cells, only cells with low energy metabolism might survive and adjust easily to in vitro conditions. This is to date the first isolation and establishment of immortalised Malaysian primary breast cancer cell lines. Breast cancer cell lines which are currently used are mostly derived from the Caucasian population. The accessibility of two newly established human breast cell lines, MBC1 and MBC2, could provide us the important tools and new experimental models to study the gene expression patterns, efficacy of therapeutic drugs and prognostic and diagnostic markers, pathogenic mechanisms and biological behaviour of breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. These cell lines could also provide the groundwork to further investigate the activity of new anti-tumour agents in mono- or polychemotherapy in vitro or to elucidate the mechanisms of drug resistance in breast cancers in the future. They also would serve as prototype models of Malaysian breast carcinogenesis.
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
Population doubling time
Fetal bovine serum
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
American type culture collection
Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium
Phosphate buffered saline
Short tandem repeat
Combined DNA index system
This work was supported by funding from the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia (Grant No. 09-02-02-009 BTK/ER/37/6) and a Graduate Student Fellowship from Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) awarded to Behnam Kamalidehghan.
- Zimonjic D, Brooks MW, Popescu N, Weinberg RA, Hahn WC: Derivation of human tumor cells in vitro without widespread genomic instability. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (24): 8838-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hisham A, Yip C: Overview of breast cancer in Malaysian women: a problem with late diagnosis. Asian J Surg. 2004, 27 (2): 130-133. 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60326-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hisham A, Yip C: Spectrum of breast cancer in Malaysian women: overview. World journal of surgery. 2003, 27 (8): 921-923. 10.1007/s00268-003-6976-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Correa C, Bertollo C, Goes A: Establishment and characterization of macl-1 and mgso-3 cell lines derived from human primary breast cancer. Oncology Research Featuring Preclinical and Clinical Cancer Therapeutics. 2009, 17 (10): 473-482. 10.3727/096504009789735404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burdall S, Hanby A, Lansdown M, Speirs V: Breast cancer cell lines: friend or foe?. Breast Cancer Research. 2003, 5 (2): 89-89. 10.1186/bcr577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osborne C, Hobbs K, Trent J: Biological differences among MCF-7 human breast cancer cell lines from different laboratories. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1987, 9 (2): 111-121. 10.1007/BF01807363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soule H, Vazguez J, Long A, Albert S, Brennan M: A human cell line from a pleural effusion derived from a breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973, 51 (5): 1409-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Engel LW, Young NA: Human breast carcinoma cells in continuous culture: a review. Cancer Res. 1978, 38 (11 Part 2): 4327-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keydar I, Chen L, Karby S, Weiss F, Delarea J, Radu M, Chaitcik S, Brenner H: Establishment and characterization of a cell line of human breast carcinoma origin. Eur J Cancer. 1979, 15 (5): 659-670. 10.1016/0014-2964(79)90139-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Azari S, Ahmadi N, Tehrani M, Shokri F: Profiling and authentication of human cell lines using short tandem repeat (STR) loci: Report from the National Cell Bank of Iran. Biologicals. 2007, 35 (3): 195-202. 10.1016/j.biologicals.2006.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd A: Limits to lifespan. Nature Cell Biology. 2002, 4 (2): E25-E27. 10.1038/ncb0202-e25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dulbecco R, Freeman G: Plaque production by the polyoma virus. Virology. 1959, 8 (3): 396-10.1016/0042-6822(59)90043-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cailleau R, Olivé M, Cruciger Q: Long-term human breast carcinoma cell lines of metastatic origin: preliminary characterization. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant. 1978, 14 (11): 911-915. 10.1007/BF02616120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Band V, Zajchowski D, Swisshelm K, Trask D, Kulesa V, Cohen C, Connolly J, Sager R: Tumor progression in four mammary epithelial cell lines derived from the same patient. Cancer Res. 1990, 50 (22): 7351-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minafra S, Morello V, Glorioso F, La Fiura A, Tomasino R, Feo S, McIntosh D, Woolley D: A new cell line (8701-BC) from primary ductal infiltrating carcinoma of human breast. Br J Cancer. 1989, 60 (2): 185-10.1038/bjc.1989.248.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fogh J: Human tumor lines for cancer research. Cancer Investigation. 1986, 4 (2): 157-184. 10.3109/07357908609038260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pettengill O, Lewko W: Cell culture of human metastatic breast carcinomas: a review. Molecular Biotherapy. 1989, 1 (3): 122-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vijver M: Molecular genetic changes in human breast cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 1993, 61: 25-56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amadori D, Bertoni L, Flamigni A, Savini S, Giovanni C, Casanova S, Paola F, Amadori A, Giulotto E, Zoli W: Establishment and characterization of a new cell line from primary human breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993, 28 (3): 251-260. 10.1007/BF00666586.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vandewalle B, D’Hooghe M, Savary J, Vilain M, Peyrat J, Deminatti M, Delobelle-Deroide A, Lefebvre J: Establishment and characterization of a new cell line (VHB-1) derived from a primary breast carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987, 113 (6): 550-558. 10.1007/BF00390864.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shen C, Gu M, Liang D, Miao L, Hu L, Zheng C, Chen J: Establishment and characterization of three new human breast cancer cell lines derived from Chinese breast cancer tissues. Cancer Cell International. 2009, 9 (1): 2-10.1186/1475-2867-9-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zoli W, Roncuzzi L, Flamigni A, Gruppioni R, Sensi A, Zini N, Amadori D, Gasperi-Campani A: A new cell line from human infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast: establishment and characterization. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1996, 122 (4): 237-242. 10.1007/BF01209652.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meltzer P, Leibovitz A, Dalton W, Villar H, Kute T, Davis J, Nagle R, Trent J: Establishment of two new cell lines derived from human breast carcinomas with HER-2/neu amplification. Br J Cancer. 1991, 63 (5): 727-10.1038/bjc.1991.164.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Engel L, Young N, Tralka T, Lippman M, O’Brien S, Joyce M: Establishment and characterization of three new continuous cell lines derived from human breast carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1978, 38 (10): 3352-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hambly R, Double J, Thompson M, Bibby M: Establishment and characterisation of new cell lines from human breast tumours initially established as tumour xenografts in NMRI nude mice. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997, 43 (3): 247-258. 10.1023/A:1005756632293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han J, Crowe D: Tumor initiating cancer stem cells from human breast cancer cell lines. Int J Oncol. 2009, 34 (5): 1449-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reile H, Birnböck H, Bernhardt G, Spruß T, Schönenberger H: Computerized determination of growth kinetic curves and doubling times from cells in microculture. Anal Biochem. 1990, 187 (2): 262-267. 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90454-H.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cailleau R, Young R, Olive M, Reeves W: Breast tumor cell lines from pleural effusions. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1974, 53 (3): 661-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ito I, Yoshimoto M, Iwase T, Watanabe S, Katagiri T, Harada Y, Kasumi F, Yasuda S, Mitomi T, Emi M: Association of genetic alterations on chromosome 17 and loss of hormone receptors in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1995, 71 (3): 438-10.1038/bjc.1995.89.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warburg O: On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science. 1956, 124 (3215): 269-270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB: Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science’s STKE. 2009, 324 (5930)): 1029-Google Scholar
- Kroemer G, Pouyssegur J: Tumor cell metabolism: cancer’s Achilles’ heel. Cancer Cell. 2008, 13 (6): 472-482. 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.