Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of clinical and molecular characteristics with miR-25 expression in patients with AML

From: High expression of miR-25 predicts favorable chemotherapy outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Characteristic

Chemotherapy group

Allo-HSCT group

High miR-25

(n = 45)

Low miR-25

(n = 45)

P

High miR-25

(n = 36)

Low miR-25

(n = 36)

P

Age/years, median

61.4 (22–82)

64.4 (31–88)

0.49

47.3 (22–72)

49.4 (18–69)

0.535

Age group/n (%) (years)

  

0.495

  

0.793

 < 60

16 (35.6)

12 (26.7)

 

27 (75)

25 (69.4)

 

 ≥ 60

29 (64.4)

33 (73.3)

 

9 (25)

11 (30.6)

 

Gender/n (%)

  

0.289

  

0.634

 Male

22 (48.9)

28 (62.2)

 

22 (61.1)

19 (52.8)

 

 Female

23 (51.1)

17 (37.8)

 

14 (38.9)

17 (47.2)

 

WBC/× 109/L, median

32.4 (0.7–297.4)

51.8 (1.5–298.4)

0.059

36.0 (0.6–223.8)

39.8 (1.2–118.8)

0.248

BM blast/%, median

69 (32–99)

67.2 (30–92)

0.955

66.2 (34–99)

70.2 (30–100)

0.277

PB blast/%, median

39.5 (0–98)

35.1 (0–97)

0.320

46.1 (0–96)

48.9 (0–94)

0.752

FAB subtypes/n (%)

 M0

4 (8.9)

4 (8.9)

1.000

6 (16.7)

3 (8.3)

0.478

 M1

13 (28.9)

7 (15.6)

0.204

7 (19.4)

16 (44.4)

0.042

 M2

12 (26.7)

9 (20)

0.619

12 (33.3)

7 (19.4)

0.285

 M4

11 (24.4)

13 (28.9)

0.812

8 (22.2)

6 (16.7)

0.767

 M5

4 (8.9)

9 (20)

0.230

2 (5.6)

2 (5.6)

1.000

 M6

1 (2.2)

0 (0.0)

1.000

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

1.000

 M7

0 (0.0)

2 (4.4)

0.494

1 (2.8)

0 (0.0)

1.000

 No date

0 (0.0)

1 (2.2)

1.000

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

1.000

Karyotype/n (%)

 Normal

18 (40)

26 (57.8)

0.140

15 (41.7)

19 (52.7)

0.479

 Complex

5 (11.1)

7 (15.6)

0.758

6 (16.6)

6 (16.6)

1.000

 Poor

0 (0.0)

5 (11.1)

0.056

1 (2.8)

4 (11.1)

0.357

 Intermediate

8 (17.8)

2 (4.4)

0.090

6 (16.7)

3 (8.4)

0.478

 MLL

1 (2.2)

2 (4.4)

1.000

3 (8.3)

0 (0.0)

0.239

 CBFβ-MYH11

6 (13.3)

1 (2.2)

0.110

4 (11.1)

1 (2.8)

0.357

 BCR-ABL1

0 (0.0)

1 (2.2)

1.000

0 (0.0)

2 (5.6)

0.493

 RUNX1-RUNX1T1

6 (13.3)

0 (0.0)

0.026

1 (2.8)

0 (0.0)

1.000

 N.D.

1 (2.2)

1 (2.2)

1.000

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

1.000

Risk(cyto)/n (%)

 Good

12 (26.7)

1 (2.2)

0.002

5 (13.9)

1 (2.8)

0.199

 Intermediate

26 (57.8)

29 (64.4)

0.665

21 (58.3)

20 (55.5)

1.000

 Poor

6 (13.3)

14 (31.1)

0.074

10 (27.8)

14 (38.9)

0.454

 Other

1 (2.2)

1 (2.2)

1.000

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

1.000

FLT3-ITD/n (%)

  

0.784

  

0.045

 Presence

9 (20.0)

7 (15.6)

 

4 (11.1)

12 (33.3)

 

 Absence

36 (80.0)

38 (84.4)

 

32 (88.9)

24 (66.7)

 

NPM1/n (%)

  

0.175

  

0.064

 Presence

11 (24.4)

18 (40)

 

6 (16.7)

14 (38.9)

 

 Absence

34 (75.6)

27 (60)

 

36 (83.3)

22 (61.1)

 

DNMT3A/n (%)

  

0.157

  

1.000

 Presence

9 (20)

16 (35.6)

 

9 (25)

9 (25)

 

 Absence

36 (80)

29 (64.6)

 

27 (75)

27 (75)

 

RUNX1/n (%)

  

0.714

  

0.710

 Presence

5 (11.1)

3 (6.7)

 

5 (13.9)

3 (8.3)

 

 Absence

40 (89.9)

42 (93.3)

 

31 (86.1)

33 (91.7)

 

MLL-PTD/n (%)

  

1.000

   

 Presence

2 (4.4)

3 (6.7)

 

2 (5.6)

2 (5.6)

 

 Absence

43 (95.6)

42 (93.3)

 

34 (94.4)

34 (94.4)

 

TP53/n (%)

  

0.522

  

1.000

 Mutation

4 (8.9)

7 (15.6)

 

2 (5.6)

2 (5.6)

 

 Wild type

41 (91.1)

38 (84.4)

 

34 (94.4)

34 (94.4)

 

CEBPA/n (%)

  

1.000

  

0.055

 Mutation

1 (2.2)

2 (4.4)

 

7 (19.4)

1 (2.8)

 

 Wild type

44 (97.8)

43 (95.6)

 

29 (80.6)

35 (97.2)

 

IDH1/n (%)

  

1.000

  

0.514

 Mutation

3 (6.7)

4 (8.9)

 

4 (11.1)

7 (19.4)

 

 Wild type

42 (93.3)

41 (91.1)

 

32 (88.9)

29 (80.6)

 

IDH2/n (%)

  

1.000

  

0.260

 Mutation

5 (11.1)

4 (8.9)

 

2 (5.6)

6 (16.7)

 

 Wild type

40 (88.9)

41 (91.1)

 

34 (94.4)

30 (83.3)

 
  1. Mann–Whitney test was used for continuous variables. Chi square tests were used for categorical variables
  2. WBC white blood cell, BM bone marrow, PB peripheral blood, FAB French–American–British classification