Skip to main content

Table 4 Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for overall survival of ccRCC patients

From: A nomogram based on 9-lncRNAs signature for improving prognostic prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Factor

Univariate

Multivariate

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

Age

 > 60 vs ≤ 60

1.462 (1.175–1.82)

0.001

1.369 (1.013–1.851)

0.041

Gender

 Male vs female

0.984 (0.787–1.23)

0.887

–

–

T stage

 T3 + 4 vs T1 + 2

2.282 (1.835–2.839)

< 0.001

1.238 (0.665–2.304)

0.500

N stage

 N1 vs N0

2.287 (1.432–3.651)

0.001

1.045 (0.626–1.746)

0.866

M stage

 M1 vs M0

2.913 (2.337–3.631)

< 0.001

2.171 (1.499–3.143)

< 0.001

TNM stage

 III + IV vs I + II

2.603 (2.072–3.27)

< 0.001

1.148 (0.573–2.299)

0.697

Grade

 G3 + 4 vs G1 + 2

2.028 (1.584–2.596)

< 0.001

1.334 (0.918–1.94)

0.131

Risk score

 ≥ Median vs < median

2.595 (2.03–3.318)

< 0.001

2.721 (1.854–3.991)

< 0.001

Back to article page

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us