Skip to main content

Table 2 The prognostic significance of ITGA and ITGB superfamily members in predicting OS in HGSOC patients in TCGA dataset

From: The prognostic value of ITGA and ITGB superfamily members in patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer

Variables

Number of patients

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

Age

405

1.025 (1.013–1.038)

< 0.001

1.023 (1.010–1.036)

< 0.001

Stage

0.078

 

0.116

 Early

23

1

 

1

 

 Late

382

2.079 (0.922–4.685)

 

1.934 (0.850–4.403)

 

Debulking

0.017

 

0.230

 Optimal

302

1

 

1

 

 Suboptimal

103

1.430 (1.065–1.920)

 

1.209 (0.887–1.649)

 

ITGA1

405

0.745 (0.474–1.170)

0.202

/

/

ITGA2

405

1.037 (0.713–1.508)

0.851

/

/

ITGA4

405

1.174 (0.777–1.774)

0.446

/

/

ITGA5

405

0.922 (0.759–1.120)

0.416

/

/

ITGA6

405

0.976 (0.819–1.163)

0.782

/

/

ITGA7

405

0.867 (0.729–1.033)

0.110

0.849 (0.712–1.013)

0.069

ITGA8

405

0.987 (0.682–1.429)

0.947

/

/

ITGA9

405

0.944 (0.660–1.348)

0.750

/

/

ITGA10

405

1.107 (0.756–1.622)

0.601

/

/

ITGB1

405

1.054 (0.832–1.336)

0.662

/

/

ITGB2

405

1.004 (0.901–1.118)

0.945

/

/

ITGB3

405

0.850 (0.501–1.441)

0.546

/

/

ITGB4

405

0.992 (0.881–1.117)

0.889

/

/

ITGB5

405

1.087 (0.916–1.290)

0.341

/

/

ITGB6

405

0.975 (0.759–1.253)

0.844

/

/

ITGB7

405

0.821 (0.592–1.139)

0.238

/

/

ITGB8

405

1.207 (1.045–1.394)

0.011

1.175 (1.014–1.362)

0.032