Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical variables and ATP1As for OS

From: Comprehensive analysis of the expression of sodium/potassium-ATPase α subunits and prognosis of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma

Characteristics

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

p-value

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

p-value

FIGO stage (stage I–II vs. stage III–IV)

2.085 (0.925–4.699)

0.076

1.638 (0.392–6.854)

0.499

Histologic grade (G1–2 vs. G3–4)

1.194 (0.797–1.789)

0.389

  

Primary therapy outcome (PR-CR vs. SD-PD)

0.306 (0.207–0.451)

< 0.001

0.247 (0.161–0.38)

< 0.001

Age (< 60 vs. ≥ 60)

1.329 (1.025–1.722)

0.032

1.305 (0.948–1.794)

0.102

Tumor residual (NRD vs. RD)

2.302 (1.479–3.583)

< 0.001

2.149 (1.285–3.594)

0.004

Lymphatic invasion (no vs. yes)

1.422 (0.839–2.411)

0.191

  

Venous invasion (no vs. yes)

0.905 (0.487–1.683)

0.753

  

Anatomic subdivision (unilateral vs. bilateral)

1.041 (0.768–1.41)

0.798

  

TP53 mutation (no vs. yes)

0.692 (0.423–1.132)

0.143

  

BRCA mutation (no vs. yes)

0.65 (0.361–1.171)

0.152

  

ATP1A1 (low vs. high)

1.148 (0.885–1.49)

0.298

  

ATP1A2 (low vs. high)

1.257 (0.968–1.632)

0.086

1.564 (1.134–2.157)

0.006

ATP1A3 (low vs. high)

1.6 (1.232–2.077)

< 0.001

1.932 (1.397–2.673)

< 0.001

ATP1A4 (low vs. high)

0.748 (0.575–0.972)

0.03

0.555 (0.4–0.771)

< 0.001