Article | Year | Biomarker | Intervention | Significant outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ando et al. [44] | 2019 | Testosterone | Docetaxel | Median OS: 35.8 months Median OS (TST > 13 ng/dl vs < 13 ng/dl): 19.2 vs 76.9 months Median PFS (TST > 13 ng/dl vs < 13 ng/dl): 5.1 vs 7.1 months Median follow-up: 21.6 months |
Hashimoto et al. [45] | 2019 | Testosterone | Abiraterone or enzalutamide | Median follow-up: 26 months Median PFS (< 5 ng/dl vs 5 ng/dl): 12.2 vs 4.5 months |
Shiota et al. [46] | 2018 | Testosterone | Enzalutamide, abiraterone, docetaxel, cabazitaxel | PFS (T < 0.05 vs > 0.05): p = 0.047 OS (T < 0.05 vs > 0.05): p = 0.18 |
Wang et al. [47] | 2017 | Testosterone | ADT | Median time to CRPC (T < 25 ng/dl vs > 25 ng/dl): 19.1 vs 14.6 months Median follow-up: 14 months |
Yasouka et al. [48] | 2019 | PSA | Cabazitaxel | Median follow-up: 13.2 (IQR) = 6.9–21.5 months 45.5% Median PFS: 4.3 months Median OS: 20.7 months PSA (> 100 ng/ml):HR = 3.65, 95% CI 1.39–10.60, p = 0.0085 |
Lin et al. [53] | 2018 | PSA | ADT | nPSA > 0.2 ng/ml: HR, 2.665, 95% CI 1.495–4.750, p < 0.001 Median follow-up: HR: 0.262, 95% CI 0.161–0.426 Median PFS: 14.0 months Median PSA: 14.7 months Median TTN: 8.10 months |
Kosaka et al. [49] | 2018 | PSA | Cabazitaxel | Median OS: 16.1 months PSA ≥ 100 ng/ml prior to cabazitaxel: HR = 4.375; 95% CI 1.755–10.91, p = 0.002 |
Pei et al. [51] | 2019 | PSA | Docetaxel | TTN ≥ 15 weeks: HR 0.093, 95% CI 0.044–0.188, p < 0.001 PSA nadir < 4.55 ng/ml: HR 4.002, 95% CI 1.890–8.856, p = 0.001 PSA decline > 50%: HR 0.573, 95% CI 0.428–0.756, p < 0.001 |
Sathekge et al. [60] | 2019 | PSA | 225Ac-PSMA-617 | Median OS: 18 months Median PFS: 15.2 months PSA decline > 50%: p < 0.001 Median follow-up: 9 months |
Alvim et al. [63] | 2019 | PSA | Abiraterone acetate | Median OS (PSAr): HR: 0.19; 95% CI 0.10–0.38; p < 0.001 Median PFS (PSAr): HR: 0.24; 95% CI 0.14–0.41; p < 0.001 Median OS (PSA): 11.5 months 29.3 vs 9.7 17 vs 5.3 |
Armstrong et al. [70] | 2018 | PSA | Enzalutamide | Median OS: 23.1 months Median time to PSA (no-decline or decline < 30% group): 3.7 month Median time to PSA progression: 13.8 months (95% CI 11.3–14.0) |
Hamano et al. [57] | 2019 | PSA | Docetaxel, AA and ENZ | PSA nadir > 0.64 ng/ml and TTN < 7 months: HR, 3.34; 95% CI 1.99–5.61; p < 0.001 Median OS: (PSA nadir > 0.64 ng/ml and TTN < 7 months): HR: 2.98; 95% CI 1.77–5.02; p < 0.001 Median follow-up: 35 months |
Yang et al. [52] | 2015 | PSA | Docetaxel | Median OS: 13.51Â months Median TTN: 5.14Â months |
Houede et al. [65] | 2015 | PSA | Abiracetone acetate | PSA response > 3 months: p = 0.00025 Median OS: 14.6 months Follow-up: 36.3 months |
Kuo et al. [56] | 2015 | PSA | ADT | Median time to PSA rise: 4.5 months Median time to PSA rises after first T > 50 ng/dl: 1.0 months Median times from primary treatment to CRPC: 9.7 years |
Schiff et al. [64] | 2019 | PSA | Abiraterone | ≥ 30% PSA at 4, 8, 12 weeks OS: range: 35.2 months to 40.0 months ≥ 50% PSA at 4, 8, 12 weeks OS: range: 37.3 months to 41.1 months |
Rahbar et al. [61] | 2017 | PSA | 177Lu-PSMA-617 | Median OS: 56.0 weeks Median OS (PSA decline > 50% vs < 50%): 66 weeks vs 47 weeks |
Ahmadzadehfar et al. [62] | 2017 | PSA | 177Lu-PSMA-617 | PSA decline ≥ 14 OS vs < 14: 88 weeks vs 29 weeks PSA decline ≥ 50% vs < 50%: HR: 70; 95% CI 39.5–100.5 vs HR: 49; 95% CI 30.2–67.8 Time to CRPC progression: 38 months |
Ji et al. [54] | 2017 | PSA | ADT | PSA nadir: HR 1.185, 95% CI 1.080–1.301, p = 0.001 Velocity of PSA decline > 11 ng/ml/month: HR 2.124, 95% CI 1.195–3.750, p = 0.001 Time to PSA nadir: 9 months Median time to progression to CRPC: 38 months |
He et al. [55] | 2017 | PSA | ADT | Mean time to CRPC: 23 months Time to reach minimal PSA (> 1-year vs < 1 year): 8.5 months vs 3.9 months |
Belderbos et al. [50] | 2019 | PSA | Cabazitaxel | Median OS: 13.3 months Haemoglobin: OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.05–2.07, p = 0.024 Lower AP: OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.96, p = 0.034 |
Chang et al. [66] | 2019 | PSA | Abiraterone, enzalutamide | Median follow-up (AA vs Enza): 18.2 vs 14.5 months Median PFS: 7.3 months vs 9.5 months PSA nadir: HR = 1.000, 95% CI 1.000–1.001, p = 0.010 Median time to CRPC (AA vs Enza): 31.5 vs 24.9 months |
Fan et al. [67] | 2018 | PSA | Abiraterone + prednisone vs prednisone | Median follow-up: 14 months (range 7.0–18.5 months Median PSA PFS:10.3 vs 3.0 months Median PSA rPFS: 13.9 vs 3.9 months Median OS: 23.3 vs 17.5 months Time to castration resistance < 18 months: HR, 12.8, 95% CI 2.0–83.1, p = 0.007 |
Fukuoka et al. [58] | 2019 | PSA | FGA therapy | Time to CRPC p = 0.007 Median PSA PFS: HR: 2.39, p = 0.020 Median PSA nadir > 1 ng/ml: HR: 2.40, p = 0.034 Time from starting PADT to PSA nadir ≤ 1 year: HR: 1.85. p = 0.047 |
Kodama et al. [87] | 2019 | PSA | ADT | Median follow-up: 31 months Median time to CRPC: 13 months CRPC survival (PSA < 100 vs > 100): 31 vs 18 months, Median OS (PSA < 100 vs > 100): 85 vs 78 months, p = 0.509 |
Papazoglou et al. [69] | 2016 | PSA | Enzalutamide | Median survival time from diagnosis of CRPC: 41.1Â months Median PFS: 3.0Â months Median OS: 6.3Â months |
Miyake et al. [68] | 2017 | PSA | Enzalutamide, abiraterone | Median time to PSA progression (TTN < 19 weeks vs TTN > 19 weeks) in Abiraterone acetate: 8.4 vs 11.1 months Median time to PSA progression (< 14 weeks vs > 14 weeks) in Enzalutamide: 11 vs 9.9 weeks |
Kobayashi et al. [71] | 2019 | LDH/ALP | ADT | Median follow-up: 48.1 months Median PFS: 24 months Median OS: 67.4 months LDH PFS: HR: 1.42; 95% CI 1.15–1.74; p = 0.0004 LDH OS: HR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.13–1.82; p = 0.0014 ALP OS: HR = 1.04; 95% CI 1.00–1.07; p = 0.015 |
Hiew et al. [72] | 2018 | LDH | Docetaxel | Serum LDH > 450 U/l: SD:0.054; 95% CI 0.650–0.864, p < 0.001 LDH PFS: HR: 1.876, 95% CI 1.289–2.7300 LDH OS: HR: 1.630, 95% CI 1.127–2.357 |
Gravis et al. [73] | 2015 | ALP | ADT | ALP OS: 62.1 vs 23.2% ALP C-index: 0.64 95% CI 0.52–0.66 Median follow-up: 58.3 months |
Mori et al. [74] | 2017 | LDH | Abiracetone, enzalutamide | LDH (< 210 IU/l: 17 months) vs LDH ≥ 210 IU/l: 8 months PFS: HR: 0.39 (0.15–1.03) 0.056 OS: HR: 0.79 (0.31–2.02) 0.63 |
Song et al. [42] | 2016 | Tyrosine Phosphatase | Docetaxel | PSA response (ERG+ vs ERG−): 15.4% vs 62.1%, p = 0.004 OS (ERG+ vs ERG−): 10.8 months vs 21.4 months, p < 0.001 C/R PFS (ERG+ vs ERG−): 3.8 months vs 9.0 months, p < 0.001 Mean follow-up: 52.9 ± 27.2 months |
Berg et al. [43] | 2015 | Tyrosine Phosphatase | ADT | Median follow-up: 6.8 years (IQR: 4.9–7.3) Median time to CRPC (ERG+ vs ERG−): 3.9 years vs 4.5 years Median OS: 5.6 months |