From: Ibrutinib in B-cell lymphoma: single fighter might be enough?
 | Therapeutic regimens | Study (year) | Disease | Phase | Study details | Efficacy | Refs. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ibrutinib-Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody | Ibrutinib-Rituximab (IR) | Burger et al. (2019) | R/R CLL | II | 40 pts with high-risk CLL | 36-month PFS 86.9% | [39] | ||
Burger et al. (2019) | CLL | NA | 208 pts, 181 pts with R/R CLL, 27 TN pts with high-risk disease | 36-month ORR 92%, PFS 86.9% | [34] | ||||
Jain et al. (2017) | R/R MCL | II | 50 pts | ORR 88%, CR 58%, PR 30% | [42] | ||||
Dimopoulos et al. (2018) | WM | III | 150 pts | MRR 72%, 30-month PFS 82% | [44] | ||||
Ibrutinib-Obinutuzumab | Moreno et al. (2019) | TN CLL | III | 116 pts | ORR 88%, CR 19%, 30-month PFS 79% | [36] | |||
Ibrutinib-Ofatumumab | Jaglowski et al. (2015) | CLL | Ib/II | 66 pts, ibrutinib lead-in (group 1), concurrent start (group 2), or ofatumumab lead-in (group 3) | ORR were 100%, 79% and 71%; 12-month PFS 89%, 85%, 75% in group1 ~ 3, respectively | [37] | |||
Ibrutinib-Ublituximab | Sharman et al. (2017) | R/R CLL | II | 45 pts | 6-month ORR 88%, pts with high-risk ORR 95% | [38] | |||
Ibrutinib-Chemoimmunotherapy | Ibrutinib-BR | Fraser et al. (2019) | R/R CLL | III | 289 pts | 36-month PFS 68%, OS 81.6% | [45] | ||
Brown et al. (2015) | R/R CLL | Ib | 30 pts | ORR 93.3%, CR 40%, OS 74%, PFS 86.3% | [46] | ||||
Chanan-Khan et al. (2016) | R/R CLL | III | 289 pts | ORR 83%, CR10%, PFS 79% | [48] | ||||
Ibrutinib-FCR | Davids et al. (2019) | CLL | II | 85 pts, 5% del17p, 4% TP53 mutations, 2 pts with both | 16.5-month CR 33% | [42] | |||
Brown et al. (2015) | R/R CLL | Ib | 3 pts | ORR 100%, CR 67%, PFS 70.3% | [46] | ||||
Shanafelt et al. (2019) | CLL | III | 354 pts to IR group, 175 pts to the FCR group | 33.6-month PFS 89.4% vs. 72.9%; OS 98.8% vs. 91.5% | [48] | ||||
Ibrutinib-R-ICE | Sauter et al. (2018) | DLBCL | I | 21 pts | ORR 90%, CR 55%, PR 35% | [49] | |||
DA-TEDDI-R | Lionakis et al. (2017) | PCNSL | Ib | 18 pts | ORR 86% | [35] | |||
Ibrutinib-R-CHOP | Younes et al. (2014) | NHL | Ib | 32pts | ORR 94% | [50] | |||
Ibrutinib-R-HD-MTX | Grommes et al. (2019) | R/R CNSL | Ib | 15 pts | 19.7-month ORR 80%, CR 53.3%, PR 26.7% | [51] | |||
Ibrutinib-Biotarget Agents | Ibrutinib-Rituximab-Lenalidomide | Ujjani et al. (2018) | R/R CLL | I | 12 pts | ORR 67%, 12-month PFS 83% | [62] | ||
Jerkeman et al. (2018) | R/R MCL | II | 50 pts | ORR 76%, CR 56%, PR 20% | [2] | ||||
Ujjani et al. (2016) | FL | I | 22 pts | ORR 95%, 12-month PFS 80% | [63] | ||||
Ibrutinib-Venetoclax | Jain et al. (2019) | TN CLL | II | 80 pts (untreated high-risk and the median age was 65Â years) | CR or CR with incomplete count recovery 88%; 1-year PFS 98%, OS 99% | [60] | |||
Tam et al. (2018) | R/R MCL | II | 24 pts, 50% with TP53 mutation, 75% had high-risk prognostic score | CR 42% | [54] | ||||
Ibrutinib-Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab | Rogers et al. (2018) | R/R CLL | Ib | 12 pts | ORR 92%, CR 42% | [55] | |||
Ibrutinib-Palbociclib | Martain et al. (2019) | MCL | I | 27 pts | 25.6-month ORR 67%, CR 37%, PFS 59.4% | [54] | |||
Ibrutinib-Umbralisib | Davids et al. (2019) | R/R CLL | Ib | 21 elder pts with more than two previous therapies | ORR 90%, CR 29%, PR 62% | [57] | |||
Davids et al. (2019) | R/R MCL | Ib | 21 pts, median age of 68Â years | ORR 67%, CR 19%, PR 48% | [57] | ||||
Ibrutinib-Umbralisib-Ublituximab | Nastoupil et al. 2019) | CLL | I | 46 pts | ORR 84% | [58] | |||
Ibrutinib-Nivolumab | Younes et al. (2019) | NHL | I/2a | 141 pts | ORR, high-risk CLL/SLL 61%, FL 33%, DLBCL 36% | [59] |