Skip to main content

Table 3 Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments, and Evaluation (GRADE) quality assessment of evidence for each comparison

From: Sarcomatoid variant urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes

Number of studies

Study design

Certainty assessment

Number of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

SV-UCB

C-UCB

Relative (95% CI)

Absolute (95% CI)

Pathologic T stage 2 and lower

4

Observational studies

Not serious

Serious

Not serious

Not serious

Strong association

156/349 (44.7%)

34,499/47,936 (72.0%)

OR 0.41 (0.23–0.71)

207 fewer per 1000

(from 348 to 74 fewer)

LOW

CRITICAL

Pathologic T stage 3 and higher

4

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Strong association

122/349 (35.0%)

8862/47,936 (18.5%)

OR 2.06 (1.64–2.59)

134 more per 1000

(from 86 to 185 more)

MODERATE

CRITICAL

High grade

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Serious

Not serious

Serious

None

24/26 (92.3%)

395/549 (71.9%)

OR 2.61 (0.02–286.71)

151 more per 1000

(from 671 fewer to 279 more)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Concomitant carcinoma in situ

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Strong association

4/33 (12.1%)

316/959 (33.0%)

OR 0.25 (0.09–0.72)

220 fewer per 1000

(from 287 to 68 fewer)

MODERATE

CRITICAL

Positive lymph node

3

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious

None

11/48 (22.9%)

400/1421 (28.1%)

OR 0.79 (0.40–1.59)

45 fewer per 1000

(from 146 fewer to 102 more)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Positive surgical margin

          

3

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious

None

2/48 (4.2%)

126/1421 (8.9%)

OR 0.55 (0.15–1.98)

38 fewer per 1000

(from 74 fewer to 73 more)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Overall survival (unadjusted)

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

None

HR 1.24 (1.07–1.44)

1 fewer per 1000

(from 1 to 1 fewer)

LOW

IMPORTANT

Cancer-specific survival (unadjusted)

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Strong association

HR 2.08 (1.63–2.66)

2 fewer per 1000

(from 3 to 2 fewer)

MODERATE

IMPORTANT

Overall survival (adjusted)

3

Observational studies

Not serious

Serious

Not serious

Serious

None

HR 1.41 (0.95–2.08)

1 fewer per 1000

(from 2 to 1 fewer)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Cancer–specific survival (adjusted)

 

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Serious

Not serious

Serious

None

HR 1.54 (0.95–2.52)

2 fewer per 1000

(from 3 to 1 fewer)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Progression-free survival

          

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious

None

HR 1.16 (0.57–2.38)

1 fewer per 1000

(from 2 to 1 fewer)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

 

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious

None

0/36 (0.0%)

83/1191 (7.0%)

OR 0.34 (0.05–2.45)

45 fewer per 1000

(from 66 fewer to 85 more)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Adjuvant chemotherapy

          

3

Observational studies

Not serious

Serious

Not serious

Serious

None

85/424 (20.0%)

3205/14,401 (22.3%)

OR 1.15 (0.48–2.79)

25 more per 1000

(from 102 fewer to 221 more)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy on OS

 

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious

None

HR 0.73 (0.51–1.05)

1 fewer per 1000

(from 1 to 1 fewer)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Adjuvant chemotherapy on OS

 

2

Observational studies

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Serious

None

HR 0.88 (0.66–1.17)

1 fewer per 1000

(from 1 to 1 fewer)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

  1. SV-UVB sarcomatoid variant urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, C-UCB conventional urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, CI confidence interval, OR odd ratio, HR hazard ratio, OS overall survival