Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of 227 patients included

From: A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution

 

Benign lesions

Dysplasia

Cancer

Total

Number of patients (%)

132 (58.1)

46 (20.3)

49 (21.6)

227 (100)

Sex (male/female)

71/61

41/5

43/6

155/72

Age (Mean ± SD)

57.9 ± 11.0

61.9 ± 9.2

63.7 ± 10.8

60.0 ± 10.9

H. Pylori (+) (%)

44 (44.0)

24 (24.0)

32 (32.0)

100 (100)

Smoking (+) (%)

22 (50.0)

8 (18.2)

14 (31.8)

44 (100)

Alcohol (+) (%)

20 (50.0)

11 (27.5)

9 (22.5)

40 (100)

Bile reflux (+) (%)

16 (51.6)

7 (22.6)

8 (25.8)

31 (100)

Biopsies (Mean ± SD)

2.5 ± 0.7

2.7 ± 0.7

2.6 ± 0.6

2.6 ± 0.7

Histology (%)

 Normal

60 (93.8)

3 (4.7)

1 (1.6)

64 (100)

 Antrum IM

30 (88.2)

3 (8.8)

1 (2.9)

34 (100)

 Corpus IM

42 (32.6)

40 (31.0)

47 (36.4)

129 (100)

Subtype of GIM (%)a

 Normal

60 (93.7)

3 (4.7)

1 (1.6)

64 (100)

 Type I

23 (82.1)

2 (7.1)

3 (10.7)

28 (100)

 Type II

34 (54.0)

17 (27.0)

12 (19.0)

63 (100)

 Type III

15 (20.8)

24 (33.3)

33 (45.8)

72 (100)

SDSGIM

 Mean ± SD

1.4 ± 1.6

4.1 ± 1.5

4.5 ± 1.4

2.6 ± 2.1

 Median and quartile

1 (0–2)

4 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

3 (0–5)

  1. aThe most severe subtype of whole stomach