Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of 227 patients included

From: A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution

  Benign lesions Dysplasia Cancer Total
Number of patients (%) 132 (58.1) 46 (20.3) 49 (21.6) 227 (100)
Sex (male/female) 71/61 41/5 43/6 155/72
Age (Mean ± SD) 57.9 ± 11.0 61.9 ± 9.2 63.7 ± 10.8 60.0 ± 10.9
H. Pylori (+) (%) 44 (44.0) 24 (24.0) 32 (32.0) 100 (100)
Smoking (+) (%) 22 (50.0) 8 (18.2) 14 (31.8) 44 (100)
Alcohol (+) (%) 20 (50.0) 11 (27.5) 9 (22.5) 40 (100)
Bile reflux (+) (%) 16 (51.6) 7 (22.6) 8 (25.8) 31 (100)
Biopsies (Mean ± SD) 2.5 ± 0.7 2.7 ± 0.7 2.6 ± 0.6 2.6 ± 0.7
Histology (%)
 Normal 60 (93.8) 3 (4.7) 1 (1.6) 64 (100)
 Antrum IM 30 (88.2) 3 (8.8) 1 (2.9) 34 (100)
 Corpus IM 42 (32.6) 40 (31.0) 47 (36.4) 129 (100)
Subtype of GIM (%)a
 Normal 60 (93.7) 3 (4.7) 1 (1.6) 64 (100)
 Type I 23 (82.1) 2 (7.1) 3 (10.7) 28 (100)
 Type II 34 (54.0) 17 (27.0) 12 (19.0) 63 (100)
 Type III 15 (20.8) 24 (33.3) 33 (45.8) 72 (100)
SDSGIM
 Mean ± SD 1.4 ± 1.6 4.1 ± 1.5 4.5 ± 1.4 2.6 ± 2.1
 Median and quartile 1 (0–2) 4 (4–5) 5 (4–5) 3 (0–5)
  1. aThe most severe subtype of whole stomach