From: Immune checkpoint blockade in the treatment of malignant tumor: current statue and future strategies
Pathology | Trial | Phase | No of. patients | Treatment | mPFS (months) | mOS (months) | ORR (%) | Other outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atezolizumab | ||||||||
 Melanoma | IMspire150 | III | – | Atezolizumab + Cobitinib + Verofini vs. Placebo + Cobitinib + Verofini | 15.1 vs. 10.6 | – | – | DOR: 21.0 vs. 12.6 months |
 NSCLC | POPLAR | II | 287 | Atezolizumab vs. Docetaxel | – | 12.6 vs. 9.7 | 15 | – |
OAK | III | 1125 | Atezolizumab vs. Docetaxel | – | 13.8 vs. 9.6 |  | – | |
 UC | IMvigor210 | II | 310 | Atezolizumab | 2.1 | 7.9 | 15 | – |
IMvigor211 | III | 931 | Atezolizumab vs. ICC | – | 11.1 vs. 10.6 | 23 vs. 22 | DOR: 15.9 vs. 8.3 months | |
 CRC | Bendell et al | I | 23 | Atezolizumab + Cobitinib | – | 72%* |  | PR: 17% |
Avelumab | ||||||||
 MCC | JAVELIN | II | 88 | Avelumab | – | – | 31.8 | CR: 9.1%; PR: 22.7% |
 UC | Patel et al | Ib | – | Avelumab | 1.5 | 7.4 | 17 | CR: 6%; PR: 11% |
 Ovarian cancer | Disis et al | I | – | Avelumab | – | – | 9.7 | DCR: 54% |
Durvalumab | ||||||||
 NSCLC | PACIFIC | III | 713 | Durvalumab vs. Placebo | 16.8 vs. 5.6 | – | – | DOR: 72.8% vs. 46.8% |
 UC | Powles et al | I/II | 191 | Durvalumab | 1.5 | 18.2 | 17.8 | CR: 4.7% |
 Ovarian cancer | MEDIOLOA | II | 32 | Durvalumab + Olaparib | – | – | 63 | – |