DNA methyltransferase 1 inhibits microRNA-497 and elevates GPRC5A expression to promote chemotherapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer

Background Abnormal DNA methylation of tumor suppressor gene promoter has been found in breast cancer. Therefore, the current study set out to explore how DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) affects breast cancer through mediating miR-497/GPRC5A axis. Methods After loss and gain-of-function approaches were conducted in MCF-7/ADR and MCF-7 cells, cell viability, IC50 value, invasion, migration and apoptosis were measured, respectively. In addition, drug resistance, metastasis and apoptosis-related protein expression were examined using immunoblotting. ChIP and dual-luciferase reporter gene assays were carried out to validate relationship among DNMT1, miR-497, and GPRC5RA. Subcutaneous xenograft tumor model in nude mice was established to detect effects of DNMT1 on growth and metastasis of breast cancer in vivo. Results It was found that DNMT1 was notably increased, while miR-497 was poorly-expressed in breast cancer. Highly-expressed DNMT1 could promote chemotherapy resistance and metastasis of breast cancer. Meanwhile, DNMT1 modified methylation of CpG island in miR-497 promoter region, thereby repressing miR-497 level. In addition, miR-497 targeted GPRC5A expression to curb chemotherapy resistance and metastasis of breast cancer cells. Lastly, in vivo experiments showed that knockdown of DNMT1 could suppress breast cancer growth and metastasis. Conclusions Collectively, our findings indicated that DNMT1 may inhibit miR-497 and boost the expression of GPRC5A through methylation, thus augmenting breast cancer chemotherapy resistance and metastasis, which provides novel mechanistic insight into the unrecognized roles of DNMT1 in breast cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02466-5.

to vital organs prevailing as the leading cause [3]. Currently, chemotherapy remains the gold-standard therapy for targeting invasion and metastasis in breast cancer [4]. Despite a decline in mortality due to the advent of targeted therapies and combination therapies, tumor metastasis still is attributable to considerable mortality rate [5].
DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) is well-established as a critical regulatory factor for the maintenance of epigenetic reprogramming and genome stability during DNA replication [6]. Interestingly, abnormal expressions of DNMTs and destruction of DNA methylation patterns were previously associated with carcinogenesis and cancer cell survival [7]. Moreover, a prior study uncovered the involvement of DNMT1 in several malignant tumors including breast cancer, while also exhibiting high expression levels in breast cancer [8]. It is also noteworthy that methylation of DNMT1 is significantly up-regulated in glioblastomas, whereas loss-function of DNMT1 was previously correlated with increased cell apoptosis and suppressed cell invasion [9]. DNMT1 can inhibit miR-18b-5p expression through DNA methylation, thereby promoting the proliferation of gallbladder cancer [10]. Meanwhile, existing literature further suggests that methylation-mediated mircoRNA-497 (miR-497) knockdown can promote breast cancer progression by up-regulating Mucin1 [11]. Furthermore, dysregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) are well-known to exert tumor-promoting or suppressing effects on breast cancer, whereas miR-497 was previously reported to be one of the profoundly down-regulated miRNAs in breast cancer [12]. Unsurprisingly, poor expressions of miR-497 in breast cancer patients have been associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes [13]. On a separate note, initial bioinformatic analyses in our study revealed the presence of targeting relationship between the G-protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member A (GPRC5A) and miR-497. As a member of the GPCR superfamily, abnormal expressions of GPRC5A are associated with tumorigenesis, while GPRC5A is also significantly expressed in breast cancer [14,15]. In light of the aforementioned evidence, we investigated how DNMT1 affects breast cancer by mediating the miR-497/GPRC5A axis.

Ethics statement
All human and animal experimentation protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. Signed informed consents were obtained from all participants, and all experimental animals operating procedures were in line with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health.

Bioinformatics analysis
Firstly, the UALCAN database was adopted to retrieve miR-497 and DNMT1 expression in breast cancer and normal samples included in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Additionally, breast cancer expression dataset GSE33447 was obtained through the GEO database, which comprised of 8 normal samples and 8 tumor samples. With normal samples taken as control, the R language "limma" package was adopted for differential analysis with |logFC| > 2, FDR < 0.05 serving as screening criteria. The GEPIA database was further employed to search differentially expressed genes in breast cancer and normal samples included in TCGA and GTEx. Furthermore, the enrichment of H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 in miR-497 promoter region in MCF-7 cells were obtained from the ENCODE database. Moreover, the downstream targets of miR-497 were predicted with the help of the StarBase database.

Collection of clinical samples
Forty two pairs of breast cancer and adjacent normal tissues were surgically collected from breast cancer female patients (age ranging between 31 and 62 years, median age: 44 years) who were hospitalized at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from 2017 to 2019. All collected samples were pathologically diagnosed as breast cancer by two experienced pathologists. The enrolled patients had no other malignant tumors, and had not undergone preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Tissue specimens obtained after resection were immediately stored at − 80 °C.

Plasmid and lentivirus transduction
The aforementioned cells were then transfected with oe-NC, oe-DNMT1, si-NC, si-DNMT1, NC inhibitor, miR-497 inhibitor, NC mimic, miR-497 mimic, control or GPRC5A. Briefly, 1 × 10 5 cells were inoculated in each well of a 6-well plate. Upon reaching 60-70% cell confluence, 750 μL OptiMEM culture solution was added, followed by addition of 250 μL transfection reagent and the mixture of LIPO3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The solution was changed after 16 h. After 48 h, the cellular RNA content was extracted, and after 72 h, the cellular protein content was extracted for subsequent experiments.
Afterwards, the cells were treated with lentiviral vector expressing shRNA against negative control (sh-NC) or shRNA against DNMT1 (sh-DNMT1). All lentiviral vectors carried luciferase. Prior to formal experiments, the lentiviral vectors were diluted with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) into different titer gradients according to the provided virus titer, and then MCF-7/ADR cells in the 96-well plate were infected with the virus for 24 h. Fluorescence intensity of green fluorescent proteins (GFP) with different titers was observed using a fluorescence microscope. Thereafter, 5 × 10 4 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate, and added with virus solution and 10 μg/ mL Polybrene (H8761, Solarbio, Beijing, China). After 16-24 h, the solution was changed. After 72 h, 1 μg/mL purinomycin (A1113803, Invitrogen) was added for cell screening. When the cells exhibited steady growth, the down-regulation effect was detected by means of RT-qPCR. All plasmids and lentiviruses were purchased from Genechem (Shanghai, China).

RT-qPCR
Abiding to the manufacturer's protocols, miR Vana ™ PARISTM RNA kits (AM1556, Invitrogen) was adopted for isolation of miRNA from extracellular vesicles (EVs), tissues, and cells. For qPCR of mRNA, cDNA was synthesized with the help of reverse transcription kits (M1701, Promega, Madison, WI). Afterwards, the obtained cDNA samples were warm bathed at 80 °C for 5 min to inactivate reverse transcriptase for subsequent PCR reaction. For miRNA qPCR, the primers in the kit were replaced. In the current experiment, miRNA first strand cDNA synthesis (tailing reaction) (b532451, Sangon, Shanghai, China) was adopted for reverse transcription. Finally, quantitative analysis of RNA was performed using Fast SYBR Green PCR kits (Applied Biosystems, NY) and an ABI Prism 7300 RT-qPCR system (Applied Biosystems), with three parallel wells set for each sample. U6 was employed as internal reference of miR-497 and GAPDH for other genes. 2 −ΔΔCT method was finally adopted to measure the target gene relative expression. All primers (Additional file 1: Table S1) were purchased from Sangon.

Immunoblotting
After lysing with 60 μL RIPA lysate containing 1% protease inhibitor and 1% phosphorylase inhibitor (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) on ice for 45 min, cells were centrifugated at 12,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C and protein supernatant was obtained. Protein concentration was measured using BCA kits (Beyotime Biotechnology). A quarter volume of 5 × Loading Buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology) was then added to the protein solution, which was further boiled at 100 °C for 10 min. Next, 20 μg of each protein solution was taken and separated in 10% SDS-PAGE gel by electrophoresis and the isolated protein gel was transferred to a PVDF membrane. After that, membrane was placed in blocking solution containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for sealing for 2 h. Subsequently, bands of corresponding molecular segments were put into the prepared primary antibody (Additional file 1: Table S2) and incubated at 4 °C overnight (12-16 h). The bands were then placed into the prepared horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibody and incubated at ambient temperature for 1 h. Following incubation, the bands were added with the ECL working solution (BM101, Biomiga, Inc. San Diego, CA). After 1 min, development was performed using the BioSpectrum 600 Imaging System (Ultra-Violet Products, Cambridge, UK). The Image J software was adopted to calculate gray value of protein bands, and gray value of target protein/GAPDH gray value was used as relative protein expression.

Methylation specific PCR (MSP)
With the help of DNA Methylation Gold ™ kits (D5005, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA), a tube of CT conversion reagent was mixed with 900 μL water, 50 μL M-solution buffer, and 300 μL M-dilution buffer (10 min). Subsequently, 20 μL DNA sample was reacted with 130 μL prepared CT conversion reagent at 98 °C for 10 min, 64 °C for 2.5 h, and stored at 4 °C. Zymo-Spin IC column was then added with 600 μL of M-binding buffer and mixed upside down. The centrifugal force was > 10,000g for 30 s. After the addition of 100 μL M-WASI buffer, the column was centrifuged (30 s), 200 μL M-desulfonation buffer was added, and allowed to stand for 15-20 min. Following repeated centrifugation (30 s), the column was added with 200 μL M-cleaning buffer, and subjected to centrifugation for 30 s. Later, 10 μL M-elution buffer was added to the column material, placed in a 1.5 mL EP and centrifuged to elute DNA.
Methylation primer sequences used for MSP amplification and non-methylation reaction are illustrated in Additional file 1: Table S3. The purified DNA was modified with bisulfite and purified, and then subjected to PCR. Sample without template were employed as NC, and the sample with CpGenome Universal Methylated DNA (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) as template was regarded as positive control. The reaction products were subsequently subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis and photography, and then analyzed with the image analysis system.

ChIP assay
First, 243 μL of 37% formaldehyde (final concentration: 1%) was added to cells on a 10 cm plate and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. Subsequently, 450 μL 2.5 M glycine was added to a final concentration of 0.125 M to terminate crosslinking. Following medium removal, cells were collected in a 15 mL centrifuge tube. The sample in centrifuge tube was centrifuged (1006.2×g, 5 min) to collect the cells. After the supernatant was discarded, SDS lysis buffer to final concentration was 1 × 10 6 cells/100 μL, followed by the addition of protease inhibitors. Afterwards, the cells were destroyed by ultrasonification. The DNA was broken to 300-800 bp size, and centrifuged at 10,000×g at 4 °C for 10 min.
Secondly, 100 μL of solution antibody containing DNMT1 (E-1001-050; dilution ratio of 1: 100, ab13537, A&D Technology Corporation, Beijing, China), H3 (ab1791, Abcam), H3K4me3 (ab8580, Abcam), and H3K27me3 (17-622, Millipore, Billerica, MA) was added to the sample, as the experimental group binding with miR-497 promoter. Subsequently, 100 μL of untreated solution was added to the sample as control group, and 4 μL of 5 M NaCl (final concentration: 0.2 M) was added to the other 100 μL of the sample, and the crosslinking was de-crosslinked (65 °C; 3 h), followed by electrophoresis. Next, 100 μL partial lysate was incubated with 900 μL of ChIP dilution buffer, 20 μL of 50 × PIC, and incubated with 60 μL of Protein A and agarose/salmon sperm DNA (4 °C; 1 h). Afterwards, the sample was precipitated at 4 °C for 10 min, and centrifuged for 1 min to collect the supernatant, and 20 μL of sample was retained as the input group. Among them, 1 μL of antibody was added to one tube and the other tube was untreated.
Afterwards, 100 μL destruction products were crosslinked by adding 4 μL of 5 M NaCl at 65 °C for 2 h. Next, 60 μL of Protein A and agarose/salmon sperm DNA were incubated in each tube (4 °C; 2 h). The sample was left standing (4 °C; 10 min), and then subjected to centrifugation for 1 min. After supernatant removal, the precipitated complex was centrifuged for 1 min. After supernatant removal another time, the elution buffer was prepared by mixing 100 μL 10% SDS, 100 μL 1 M NaHCO3, and 800 μL ddH 2 O (total volume: 1 mL). Then, 250 μL elution buffer was mixed upside down in test tube at ambient temperature for 15 min, and supernatant was centrifuged.
Finally, 500 μL of the elution buffer was mixed with 20 μL of 5 M NaCl (final concentration: 0.2 M), and decrosslinked at 65 °C overnight. The following day, 1 μL RNASeA (MBI, Vilnius, Lithuania) was incubated in a tube and at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by addition of 10 μL of 0.5 M EDTA, 20 μL of L1 M Tris-HCl (pH = 6.5), and 2 μL of 10 mg/mL protease K (45 °C; 2 h). Omega Gel was adopted to recycle test kits. In the end, the samples were dissolved in 100 μL ddH2O, followed by RT-qPCR.

CCK-8 assay
After the cells were trypsinized and centrifuged, cell suspension was seeded in a 96-well plate (5 × 10 3 cells). 5 parallel wells were set. After 24 h, original medium was discarded, and cells were incubated with different concentrations of ADR (diluted with PBS, the concentration gradient was set to 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 μmol/L) for 48 h. Subsequently, ADR solution was discarded, and 110 μL of CCK-8 mixture solution (DMEM:CCK8 reagent = 100 μL:10 μL) was added to each well (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Later, the 96-well plate was cultured in a 37 °C incubator for 0.5-2 h. Afterwards, the absorbance OD value was detected at 450 nm using a microplate analyzer, and the IC50 value was calculated using the SPSS21.0 statistical software.

Flow cytometry
Cells (1 × 10 6 cells/well) were seeded in a 6-well plate, and collected 24 h later, followed by detachment and centrifugation. Subsequently, Annexin V-FITC/PI, 400 μL of Annexin V binding solution were added to the cell precipitates to resuspend the cells. Next, the cells were incubated with 10 μL PI and 5 μL Annexin V-FITC staining in conditions void of light at 4 °C for 10 min, and apoptosis was detected by means of FACSCalibur flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Transwell assay
The chambers were pre-linked with Matrigel gel (356235, BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber, BD Biosciences). After being cultured in serum-free DMEM for 24 h, cells were counted, and the concentration of cell suspension was adjusted to 1 × 10 5 cells/mL. Basolateral chamber of forage hole was added with DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, while the Apical chamber was added with 200 μL cell suspension. After 48-h cell growth, uninvaded cells and Matrigel gel were carefully wiped with a cotton swab, and the Transwell chamber was taken out, fixed, and then stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Afterwards, 5 visual fields were randomly selected under an inverted microscope for observation, photography and counting.

Scratch assay
Cells (1 × 10 6 cells/well) were seeded in a 6-well plate and cultured at 37 °C. When cells were cultured into monolayer cells, scratches were made in the cells with pipette tips. The time of making scratches was set to 0 h, and was observed once every 12 h, with the image recorded at 48 h. The ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) was adopted to analyze the images and calculate the percentage of wound healing area.

Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay
HEK-293 T cell lines (procured from the Cell bank of Shanghai Institute of Cell Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences) were cultured in DMEM. Upon 80-90% confluence, cells were detached and passaged, and then routinely cultured in an incubator in 5% CO 2 at 37 °C. Cells were selected for experiment. The GPRC5A 3′UTR gene fragment was artificially synthesized, and then introduced into the pmirGLO vector (Promega) using endonuclease sites to design complementary sequence mutation sites on the GPRC5A wild type. The target fragment was subsequently inserted into the pGL3-control vector using T4 DNA ligase after restrictive endonuclease treatment.
Afterwards, the correctly sequenced luciferase reporter plasmid WT and MUT were co-transfected into HEK-293 T cells with miR-497 mimic, respectively. Next, the co-transfected cells were collected and lysed 48 h after transfection, and luciferase activity was detected using a Luminometer TD-20/20 detector (E5311, Promega) with Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System kits (Promega).

Immunohistochemical assay
Fresh tumor tissue specimens were sliced into appropriate sizes and fixed, dehydrated with ethanol, cut into 4-μm thickness sections, and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin sections of nude mouse tumor tissues were placed in an incubator and stored (60 °C; 2 h). Subsequently, the sections were hydrated with ethanol (100, 95, 85, 70%) and deionized water, and then immersed in citric acid buffer (0.01 mol/L, pH 6.0) and heated at 95-100 °C for 30 min. Next, the sections were incubated with 0.5% Triton × 100 for 30 min. Afterwards, the sections were stained with a biotin-streptavidin HRP detection system (Beijing ZSGB Company, China).
The above-mentioned sections were mixed with corresponding primary antibody and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The following day, the sections were incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h, and observed under a microscope. Brown staining was indicative of a positive immune response. The immunostaining intensity was calculated according to previously stated methods [16]. The images were observed under Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope (Fukasawa, Japan) system and analyzed using the Nikon software.

Xenograft tumors in nude mice
A total of 24 male BALB/c nude mice (age range 4-6 weeks old, weight range 17-22 g) were purchased from Hunan SJA Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Hunan, China). After a 1-week period of adaptive feeding, the mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 6), and placed in a specific environment with 28 °C, 50% humidity, and asepsis for regular observation. Two groups of nude mice were selected for subcutaneous tumor formation experiments. Briefly, 150 μL of MCF-7/ADR cells (2 × 10 6 ) transduced with sh-DNMT1 or sh-NC were injected subcutaneously into the nude mice through the back. After 1 week, the mice were injected with ADR 0.1 mL (25 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection), twice a week. Tumor growth in nude mice was monitored weekly, and tumor volume (maximum diameter × minimum diameter 2 × 0.5) was calculated. After 6 weeks of medication, the mice were anesthetized by means of cervical dislocation. The transplanted tumor was then separated from the nude mice, and the tumor weight was immediately measured. The obtained tumor tissues were fixed to make pathological sections, which were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and the expression patterns of various factors were detected by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemical.
MCF-7/ADR cells (2 × 10 6 cells) transduced with sh-DNMT1 or sh-NC were injected into nude mice (150 μL) via tail vein, followed by the ADR treatment. After 5 weeks, the nude mice were anesthetized with phenobarbital sodium and fluorescence imaging was performed in vivo using the LB983 NIGHTOWL II system (Berthold Technologies GmbH, Calmbacher, Germany), and lung metastases were observed.

Statistical analysis
Measurement data, summarized by mean ± standard deviation, were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 software (IBM, Armonk, New York), with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Data comparison between tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues was conducted by means of paired t test, while unpaired t test was adopted for comparisons of unpaired data between two groups. One-way ANOVA was conducted for multiple group comparison, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. Two-way ANOVA was performed to compare data between two groups at different time points, and the IC50 value was analyzed after log transformation. Pearson correlation analysis was adopted to analyze correlation between indicators.

DNMT1 participates in the occurrence of breast cancer by mediating miR-497 methylation
Existing literature suggests that DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 possesses the ability to inhibit miR-18b-5p expression through DNA methylation, thereby promoting the proliferation of gallbladder cancer. Apart from that, DNMT1 is also known to mediate the methylation of miR-34a promoter to enhance chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer cells [17,18]. Accordingly, we first analyzed the expression patterns of miR-497 and DNMT1 in breast cancer and adjacent normal tissues collected by TCGA through the UALCAN database, and found that miR-497 was poorly-expressed and DNMT1 was highly-expressed in breast cancer relative to adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1A).
Furthermore, RT-qPCR illustrated suppression of miR-497 and elevation of DNMT1 in breast cancer tissues when compared to adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1B). In addition, Pearson correlation analysis revealed that miR-497 and DNMT1 expressions were negatively-correlated (Fig. 1C).

DNMT1 promotes drug resistance and metastasis of breast cancer
To further elucidate the regulatory effect of DNMT1 on breast cancer, we employed RT-qPCR and found that relative to MCF-10A cells, DNMT1 expression levels were strikingly increased in MCF-7/ADR and MCF-7 cells. Moreover, DNMT1 expression was enhanced in MCF-7/ ADR cells relative to MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2A). In addition, we observed that DNMT1 was up-regulated in MCF-7 cells as a result of oe-DNMT1 transduction, while being down-regulated in MCF-7/ADR cells following si-DNMT1. Moreover, RT-qPCR validated the successful transduction in MCF-7/ADR cells and MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2B).
Furthermore, detection results of CCK-8 illustrated that the cell viability and IC50 value of ADR were both notably increased of MCF-7 cells in response to oe-DNMT1, whereas opposing trends were noted after si-DNMT1 treatment (Fig. 2C). Meanwhile, as expounded by Transwell assay and scratch assay results, oe-DNMT1 transduction resulted in increased migration and invasion abilities. On the other hand, si-DNMT1 transduction brought about reduced migration and invasion abilities (Fig. 2D, E; Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). Flow cytometric results further revealed that apoptosis was reduced in oe-DNMT1-transduced MCF-7 cells, while increased apoptosis was observed in si-DNMT1-transduced MCF-7/ADR cells (Fig. 2F; Additional file 1: Fig.  S1B). In lieu of these findings, DNMT1 was believed to promote chemotherapy resistance and metastasis of breast cancer cells.

DNMT1 promotes methylation of miR-497 promoter CpG island
Prediction results from the MethPrimer database illustrated the presence of CpG islands in promoter region of miR-497 (Fig. 3A). Additionally, existing evidence suggests that CpG island methylation in promoter region of miR-497 can inhibit its expression [11,12]. Accordingly, to clarify whether DNMT1 affected miR-497 through methylation regulation, we performed a series of MSP experiments, and observed methylation of CpG island in the miR-497 promoter in cancer tissues, while there was no methylation in normal adjacent tissues (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, we also found methylation of the miR-497 promoter CpG island in MCF-7 and MCF-7/ADR cells, but no methylation was observed in MCF-10A cells (Fig. 3C).
Subsequently, we transfected MCF-10A cells with oe-DNMT1, while MCF-7 cells were treated with si-DNMT1. MSP displayed that the CpG island of miR-497 promoter exhibited methylation state in oe-DNMT1transduced MCF-10A cells. On the other hand, si-DNMT1 transduction in MCF-7 cells brought about attenuated or eliminated CpG island methylation of miR-497 promoter (Fig. 3D). Moreover, RT-qPCR results illustrated that oe-DNMT1 transduction resulted in silenced miR-497 expression, while opposing trends were noted in response to si-DNMT1 (Fig. 3E).
Furthermore, we treated MCF-7 cells with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-dc to inhibit the methylation regulation of DNMT1, and found that miR-497 expression levels were boosted in MCF-7 cells treated with 5-aza-dc compared to those treated with DMSO (Fig. 3F). Meanwhile, the results of the  ChIP assay showed that 5-aza-dc transduction reduced the recruitment of DNMT1 to the miR-497 promoter region compared to DMSO (Fig. 3G). Furthermore, the enrichment of H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 in miR-497 promoter region in MCF-7 cells were predicted using the ENCODE database, the results of which showed increased enrichment of H3K27me3 modification in promoter region of miR-497, in addition to insignificant enrichment of H3K4me3 modification (Fig. 3H). Moreover, ChIP assay results also validated that the enrichment of H3K27me3 on the miR-497 promoter in MCF-7 cells was increased compared to that in MCF-10A cells (Fig. 3H).

DNMT1 inhibits miR-497 expression through methylation modification to promote breast cancer chemotherapy resistance and metastasis
Furthermore, we adopted a recovery experiment in MCF-7/ADR cells by transduction with the corresponding plasmids, and observed that DNMT1 expression was notably silenced whereas miR-497 expression was raised in MCF-7/ADR cells following treatment with si-DNMT1. In addition, miR-497 expression was suppressed in cells transfected with miR-497-inhibitor alone. Meanwhile, miR-497 expression was notably reduced and those of DNMT1 showed no significant changes in response to si-DNMT1 and miR-497-inhibitor (Fig. 4A). In addition, it was found that cell viability, IC50 value, cell migration and invasion abilities of MCF-7/ADR cells were all reduced, while apoptosis was boosted in cells in the presence of si-DNMT1. Meanwhile, miR-497-inhibitor brought about enhanced cell viability, migration, invasion abilities and improved IC50 value as well as diminished apoptosis in MCF-7/ADR cells. On the other hand, miR-497-inhibition reversed the aforementioned trends of si-DNMT1 on the biological process of cells (Fig. 4B-E; Additional file 1: Fig. S1C, D).
Moreover, immunoblotting was adopted to detect drug resistance, apoptosis and EMT-related protein expression patterns, the results of which were consistent with those of cell function experiments. It was observed that si-DNMT1 transduction brought about down-regulated BCRP, MDR1, Bcl-2, Vimentin, and N-cadherin expression levels and up-regulated those of Bax and E-cadherin, while opposing trends were observed after down-regulation of miR-497. Meanwhile, simultaneous down-regulation of DNMT1 and miR-497 reversed the aforementioned effects of DNMT1 knockdown on these proteins (Fig. 4F). Altogether, these findings indicated that DNMT1 inhibited the expression of miR-497 through methylation modification, thereby promoting breast cancer chemotherapy resistance and metastasis.

miR-497 inhibits breast cancer chemotherapy resistance and metastasis by down-regulating GPRC5A
Differential analyses of the breast cancer sample dataset GSE33447 retrieved from the GEO database revealed a total of 101 highly-expressed genes in breast cancer (Fig. 5A). Subsequently, the target genes of miR-497 were predicted with the StarBase database were combined with the microarray analysis results. The intersection was obtained following GEPIA website analysis, and finally 5 candidate genes CXCL10, HOXC13, GPRC5A, MMP11, and OLR1 were identified (Fig. 5B). The expression patterns of these 5 genes in breast cancer samples were analyzed with TCGA and GTEx, which revealed that GPRC5A exhibited the highest expression in breast cancer (Fig. 5C). Moreover, existing evidence suggests GPRC5A is up-regulated in tumors and further associated with tumor metastasis [19]. Accordingly, GPRC5A was chosen as the gene of interest for follow-up research.
Furthermore, we conducted CCK-8, flow cytometry, Transwell and scratch assays in MCF-7/ADR cells to validate whether miR-497 affected breast cancer progression by regulating the GPRC5A expression. Subsequent results illustrated that transfection of miR-497-mimic brought about reduced cell viability, IC50 value, cell invasion and migration but increased apoptosis in MCF-7/ADR cells. In addition, the ectopically expressed GPRC5A resulted in increased cell viability, IC50 value, cell invasion and migration but reduced apoptosis. Meanwhile, transduction of miR-497-mimic and GPRC5A led to elevated cell viability, IC50 value, cell invasion and migration but diminished apoptosis in comparison with those treated with miR-497-mimic and control (Fig. 5G-J; Additional file 1: Fig. S1E, F). Immunoblotting further illustrated that up-regulation of miR-497 expression resulted in reduced GPRC5A, BCRP, MDR1, Bcl-2, Vimentin, and N-cadherin expression levels as well as increased Bax and E-cadherin expressions. Collectively, GPRC5A elevation could reverse the effect of miR-497 on related proteins (Fig. 5K).

Down-regulation of DNMT1 inhibits breast cancer cell growth and metastasis in nude mice
Stably transduced cells with sh-DNMT1 were successfully validated by means of RT-qPCR (Fig. 6A). The transduced cell suspension was then subcutaneously injected into nude mice, and injected with ADR 1 week later. The tumor volume and weight in the mice transduced with sh-DNMT1 were reduced in the presence of ADR (Fig. 6B-D).
Furthermore, the tumor tissues were dissected and RT-qPCR expounded that DNMT1 expression levels were reduced, while those of miR-497 were increased in tumor tissues in the presence of sh-DNMT1 and ADR (Fig. 6E). As displayed by the results of immunohistochemical assay, the levels of GPRC5A, Vimentin, N-cadherin, and Ki67 were lower in tissues in response to sh-DNMT1 and ADR relative to those to sh-NC and ADR, while E-cadherin levels were remarkably elevated (Fig. 6F). Lastly, fluorescence intensity was reduced in mice transduced with sh-DNMT1 in the presence of ADR (Fig. 6G). As observed by HE staining, the number of metastatic nodules in the lung tissues was reduced after down-regulation of DNMT1 (Fig. 6H).

Discussion
The process of DNA methylation is controlled by the DNMT protein to regulate the chromatin structure and gene expression of the entire genome, and further regarded as a critical epigenetic marker [20]. It is also noteworthy that aberrant over-expression of DNMT1 has been documented in various malignancies, which highlights the significant impact on cancer-related epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes [21]. The obtained findings of our work revealed that DNMT1 may inhibit miR-497 expression and boost expression of GPRC5A through DNA methylation, thus augmenting chemotherapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer.
Firstly, DNMT1 was highly-expressed and miR-497 was poorly-expressed in breast cancer, whilst exhibiting negative-correlation. Similarly, a number of studies have come across up-regulated levels of DNMT1 in TNBC and inflammatory interstitial breast cancer, in addition to over-expression of DNMT1 in the mammary gland tissues of mammary gland-specific Kindlin-2 transgenic mice [22,23]. Interestingly, loss-function assay of miR-497, another key topic of interest in our study, was previously associated with poor prognoses of breast cancer patients [13]. On the other hand, a prior study further indicated that over-expression of miR-497 can inhibit aggressive tumor biology, and cause G1 blockade [24]. The regulatory relationship between DNMT1 and miR-497 has also been previously explored, with results suggesting that DNMT1 mediates the methylation of miR-34a promoter and promotes the resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to molecular targeted drugs [18]. Moreover, DNA methylation is known to play a significant role in regulating miR-497 in hepatocellular carcinoma [25]. Additionally, our findings further revealed iDNMT1 could promote chemotherapy resistance and metastasis of breast cancer cells, as evidenced by decreased IC50 value of ADR, diminished cell invasion and migration along with decreased apoptosis as a result of DNMT1 knockdown. In accordance with our findings, another prior study noted that down-regulation of DNMT1 exerted a suppressive effect on cell migration and invasion [26]. Besides, DNA methylation inhibition is known to repress the growth of spontaneous breast tumors in genetically engineered mouse breast cancer models, and further lead to early tumor cell necrosis and apoptosis, which in also in line our findings [27]. Moreover, we also uncovered that DNMT1 promoted CpG island methylation of the miR-497 promoter. Unsurprisingly, down-regulation miR-497 and hypermethylation at its promoter CpG island is a common occurrence in breast cancer [11]. Together, these findings and evidences suggest that DNMT1 could promote the methylation The molecular mechanism of DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 mediating miR-497/GPRC5A axis and affecting breast cancer chemotherapy resistance and metastasis of the CpG island in miR-497 promoter region, thereby inhibiting miR-497, while the treatment of 5-aza-dc prevents methylation regulation of miR-497 by DNMT1. Furthermore, our findings revealed that down-regulation of DNMT1 contributed to decreased BCRP, MDR1, Bcl-2, Vimentin and N-cadherin expression levels, while enhancing those of Bax and E-cadherin. These findings are particularly in line a prior study, wherein DNMT3A and DNMT3B were illustrated to repress E-cadherin expression by methylation of the E-cadherin promoter, while down-regulation of E-cadherin was associated with deterioration of DNMT3B in hospitalized breast cancer patients [28]. Above all, we uncovered that DNMT1 promoted chemotherapy resistance and metastasis of breast cancer via inhibition of miR-497 expression through methylation modification. Moreover, a prior study documented notably increased expressions of GPRC5A in breast cancer [15]. On a separate note, inhibition of miR-497 can accelerate carcinogenesis of tumors of breast cancer, whereas elevation of miR-497 is known to suppress the oncogenic phenotype of MCF-7 cells [13,29]. Meanwhile, in gastric cancer, up-regulation of miR-497-5p was previously shown to induce inhibited cell migration, invasion and EMT [30]. Lastly, our findings revealed that down-regulation of DNMT1 inhibited growth and metastasis of breast cancer cells in nude mice. Similarly, physcion 8-O-β-glucopyranoside inhibits breast cancer metastasis by silencing DNMT1, which is line with our findings [26].

Conclusions
Altogether, DNMT1 inhibits miR-497 and elevates GPRC5A expression through methylation to promote chemotherapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer (Fig. 7), which sheds a new light on the anti-tumor significance of DNMT1 in regard to breast cancer. Nevertheless, unpredictable factors require further exploration in clinical settings, while, inclusion of another breast cell line would also further strengthen our findings.