Skip to main content

Table 2 Error rate of each candidate prediction model

From: An improved advanced fragment analysis-based classification and risk stratification of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

No.

Marker genes

Error rate

4

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1

11.64

5

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3

10.58

6

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3 ALOX5

11.11

7

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3 ALOX5 CD69

10.85

8

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3 ALOX5 CD69 STCH

10.85

9

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3 ALOX5 CD69 STCH FNDC3A

10.85

10

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3 ALOX5 CD69 STCH FNDC3A PROM1

10.32

11

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3 ALOX5 CD69 STCH FNDC3A PROM1 MARCKS

10.58

12

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3 ALOX5 CD69 STCH FNDC3A PROM1 MARCKS ITGA6

10.58

13

ITM2A COL6A3 PTPRK RBMS1 IMP-3 ALOX5 CD69 STCH FNDC3A PROM1 MARCKS ITGA6 FRMD4B

10.85