Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the nomogram with vascular, TNM stage, prognostic model, and the combined model

From: Identification of a six-gene signature predicting overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma

Models

1-year AUC (95% CI)

P-value

3-year AUC (95% CI)

P-value

5-year ACU (95% CI)

P-value

Vascular model

0.76 (0.64–0.87)

–

0.66 (0.56–0.77)

–

0.58 (0.47–0.70)

–

TNM model

0.73 (0.59–0.87)

–

0.63 (0.53–0.74)

–

0.57 (0.46–0.68)

–

Prognostic model

0.73 (0.58–0.87)

–

0.72 (0.61–0.84)

–

0.72 (0.57–0.86)

–

Nomogram (combined) model

0.87 (0.80–0.95)

–

0.78 (0.66–0.88)

–

0.71 (0.58–0.85)

–

Nomogram vs. vascular model

 

0.05

 

0.027

 

0.01

Nomogram vs. TNM model

 

0.01

 

0.01

 

0.03

Nomogram vs. prognostic model

 

0.01

 

0.29

 

0.93

  1. AUC area under curve, CI confidence interval, TNM tumor-node-metastasis