Skip to main content

Table 2 Main characteristics of included studies about PD-1 in this meta-analysis

From: The prognostic significance of PD-L1 and PD-1 expression in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Origin

Range of year

Categories

No. of patients

Cut off value for PD-1 positive

No. of positive

Detected area

Endpoints

Detection method

Hazard ratio

Calculation of HRs

Quality score

Cao et al.

2018

China

NA

Primary

108

H-score > 0

41

TIL

OS

FFPE, IHC

Report

Multivariate

7

Hsu et al.

2010

China

2003–2004

Primary

46

> Median expression rate: 27.8% (intratumoral CD8), > median expression rate: 14.5% (intratumoral CD4)

23, 23

Intratumoral CD8, intratumoral CD4

OS

FFPE, IHC

Report

Multivariate

7

Lu et al.

2018

China

2007–2012

Primary

197

PD-1 staining intensity 2 in > 5% of TILs

96

TIL

OS

FFPE, IHC

K–M curve

Univariate

7

Tang et al.

2017

China

NA

NA

96

NA

36

TIL

OS

FFPE, IHC

K–M curve

Univariate

6

Zhou et al.

2017

China

2001–2013

Recurrence

132

NA

50

TIL

OS

FFPE, IHC

Report

Univariate

9

Zhou et al. [2]

2017

China

2010–2012

Primary

99

PD-1 staining intensity 2 in > 5% of TILs

44

TIL

OS

FFPE, IHC

K–M curve

Univariate

9

  1. FFPE: Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded; HRs: hazard ratios; IHC: immunohistochemistry; K–M curve: Kaplan–Meier curve; NA: not available; No: number; OS: overall survival; TIL: tumor infiltrating lymphocytes