Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical variables and ATP1As for DSS

From: Comprehensive analysis of the expression of sodium/potassium-ATPase α subunits and prognosis of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma

Characteristics

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

p-value

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

p-value

FIGO stage (stage I–II vs. stage III–IV)

2.244 (0.922–5.462)

0.075

1.092 (0.257–4.639)

0.905

Histologic grade (G1–2 vs. G3–4)

1.313 (0.833–2.07)

0.24

  

Primary therapy outcome (SD-PD vs. PR-CR)

0.299 (0.201–0.443)

< 0.001

0.296 (0.169–0.517)

< 0.001

Age (< 60 vs. ≥ 60)

1.248 (0.944–1.65)

0.12

  

Tumor residual (NRD vs. RD)

2.559 (1.572–4.166)

< 0.001

2.991 (1.526–5.86)

0.001

Lymphatic invasion (no vs. yes)

1.407 (0.816–2.425)

0.219

  

Venous invasion (no vs. yes)

0.846 (0.45–1.591)

0.604

  

Anatomic subdivision (unilateral vs. bilateral)

1.034 (0.747–1.431)

0.841

  

TP53 mutation (no vs. yes)

0.643 (0.386–1.07)

0.089

1.026 (0.565–1.861)

0.934

BRCA mutation (no vs. yes)

0.596 (0.313–1.134)

0.115

  

ATP1A1 (low vs. high)

1.135 (0.857–1.501)

0.377

  

ATP1A2 (low vs. high)

1.304 (0.984–1.727)

0.064

1.413 (0.958–2.085)

0.082

ATP1A3 (low vs. high)

1.572 (1.188–2.081)

0.002

1.723 (1.169–2.54)

0.006

ATP1A4 (low vs. high)

0.721 (0.544–0.956)

0.023

0.611 (0.408–0.916)

0.017