Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in ICC (n = 359)

From: Peritumoral plasmacytoid dendritic cells predict a poor prognosis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection

Variable

TTR

OS

HR (95% CI)

P

HR (95% CI)

P

Univariate analysis

 Age, year (≤ 50 versus > 50)

0.89 (0.63–1.28)

0.551

1.29 (0.94–1.78)

0.116

 Sex (female versus male)

1.04 (0.77–1.39)

0.809

1.07 (0.83–1.38)

0.583

 HBsAg (negative versus positive)

1.09 (0.80–1.50)

0.577

0.72 (0.54–0.96)

0.025

 AFP, ng/ml (≤ 20 versus > 20)

1.17 (0.76–1.79)

0.483

0.84 (0.56–1.26)

0.396

 CA199 (≤ 36 versus > 36)

1.19 (0.88–1.60)

0.258

1.90 (1.46–2.48)

0

 GGT,U/L (≤ 54 versus > 54)

1.35 (1.00–1.81)

0.05

1.92 (1.48–2.48)

0

 Liver cirrhosis (no versus yes)

1.16 (0.83–1.62)

0.396

0.83 (0.61–1.12)

0.226

 Tumor size, cm (≤ 5 versus > 5)

1.38 (1.02–1.86)

0.035

1.65 (1.28–2.14)

0

 Tumor number (single versus multiple)

2.48 (1.81–3.40)

0

2.66 (2.03–3.47)

0

 Microvascular/bile duct invasion (no versus yes)

1.02 (0.70–1.48)

0.937

1.48 (1.10–1.97)

0.009

 Lymphatic metastasis (no versus yes)

2.23 (1.52–3.28)

0

2.70 (1.96–3.72)

0

 Tumor encapsulation (complete versus none)

1.91 (1.20–3.04)

0.006

1.46 (1.01–2.11)

0.042

 Tumor differentiation (I + II versus III + IV)

1.10 (0.82–1.48)

0.519

1.43 (1.11–1.84)

0.005

 TNM stage (I versus II + III + IV)

1.92 (1.42–2.59)

0

2.78 (2.14–3.61)

0

 Intra-pDCs (low versus high)

1.16 (0.87–1.56)

0.314

1.18 (0.91–1.51)

0.208

 Peri-pDCs (low versus high)

1.77 (1.29–2.44)

0

1.87 (1.42–2.46)

0

 Peri-Tregs (low versus high)

1.63 (1.19–2.24)

0.003

1.53 (1.17–2.01)

0

 Peri-pDCs and Tregs (both low vs. both high)

2.22 (1.49–3.31)

0

2.17 (1.55–3.03)

0

Multivariate analysis

 HBsAg (negative versus positive)

NA

NA

0.70 (0.51–0.97)

0.033

 CA199 (≤ 36 versus > 36)

NA

NA

1.35 (1.01–1.82)

0.045

 GGT, U/L (≤ 54 versus > 54)

NA

NA

1.65 (1.24–2.21)

0.001

 Tumor size, cm (≤ 5 versus > 5)

1.05 (0.75–1.46)

0.786

1.13 (0.84–1.51)

0.435

 Tumor number (single versus multiple)

1.94 (1.36–2.77)

0

2.12 (1.57–2.86)

0

 Microvascular/bile duct invasion (no versus yes)

NA

NA

1.28 (0.91–1.79)

0.153

 Lymphatic metastasis (no versus yes)

1.72 (1.12–2.64)

0.014

2.09 (1.45–3.00)

0

 Tumor encapsulation (complete versus none)

1.96 (1.18–3.25)

0.009

1.58 (1.04–2.42)

0.034

 Tumor differentiation (I + II versus III + IV)

NA

NA

1.32 (1.00–1.74)

0.051

 Peri-pDCs (low versus high)

1.54 (1.11–2.14)

0.01

1.55 (1.17–2.05)

0.002

 Peri-Tregs (low versus high)

1.59 (1.16–2.20)

0.004

1.34 (1.02–1.77)

0.036

 Peri-pDCs and Tregs (both low vs. both high)

1.96 (1.30–2.94)

0.001

1.74 (1.23–2.47)

0.002

  1. The italic numerals indicate P value < 0.05
  2. Cox proportional hazards regression model
  3. AFP alpha-fetoprotein, GGT gamma glutamyl transferase, CA 19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis, HR hazard ratio, CI confidential interval