Fig. 4
From: High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients
Comparison of OS and DFS between different CEA, FARI, PNI and CFP groups in LARC patients. a Kaplan–Meier analysis for OS rate between different CFP groups in LARC patients (p = 0.0001). b Kaplan–Meier analysis for the DFS rate between different CFP groups in LARC patients (p < 0.0001). c Kaplan–Meier analysis for OS rate between different CEA groups in LARC patients (p = 0.0083). d Kaplan–Meier analysis for the DFS rate between different CEA groups in LARC patients (p = 0.1160). e Kaplan–Meier analysis for OS rate between different PNI groups in LARC patients (p < 0.0001). f Kaplan–Meier analysis for the DFS rate between different PNI groups in LARC patients (p = 0.0003). g Kaplan–Meier analysis for OS rate between different FARI groups in LARC patients (p < 0.0001). h Kaplan–Meier analysis for the DFS rate between different FARI groups in LARC patients (p < 0.0001).