Skip to main content

Table 5 Association between the RIPK1 tag SNPs and EOC patient’s characteristics

From: RIPK1 polymorphisms and expression levels: impact on genetic susceptibility and clinical outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer

Characteristics

rs6907943

rs9392453

Genotype

OR (95% CI)a

Genotype

OR (95% CI)a

AA

AC

CC

Dominant (AA vs. AC/CC)

Recessive (AA/AC vs. CC)

Overdominant (AA/CC vs. AC)

TT

CT

CC

Dominant (TT vs. CT/CC)

Recessive (CT/TT vs. CC)

Overdominant (CT vs. CC/TT)

Age

 ≤50

82 (49.1%)

65 (38.9%)

20 (12%)

1.35 (0.85-2.13)

2.5 (1.03-5.88)

1.02 (0.64-1.64)

85 (50.9%)

67 (40.1%)

15 (9%)

1.64 (1.04-2.63)

1.89 (0.76-4.76)

1.43 (0.88-2.27)

 >50

86 (56.6%)

58 (38.2%)

8 (5.3%)

   

94 (61.8%)

50 (32.9%)

8 (5.3%)

   

FIGO stage

 I-II

52 (53.6%)

36 (37.1%)

9 (9.3%)

0.64 (0.35-1.15)

0.88 (0.31-2.46)

0.65 (0.35-1.2)

57 (58.8%)

32 (33%)

8 (8.2%)

0.70 (0.39-1.26)

1.37 (0.47-4.00)

0.62 (0.33-1.15)

 III-IV

116 (52.2%)

87 (39.2%)

19 (8.6%)

   

122 (55%)

85 (38.3%)

15 (6.8%)

   

Histological type

 Serous

117 (56%)

74 (35.4%)

18 (8.6%)

1.55 (0.84-2.85)

0.90 (0.31-2.63)

1.63 (0.88-3.04)

117 (56%)

77 (36.8%)

15 (7.2%)

0.98 (0.53-1.82)

1.21 (0.39-3.79)

0.92 (0.49-1.75)

 Non-serous

51 (46.4%)

49 (44.5%)

10 (9.1%)

   

62 (56.4%)

40 (36.4%)

8 (7.3%)

   

Tumor grade b

 G1-G2

32 (51.6%)

24 (38.7%)

6 (9.7%)

0.97 (0.5-1.89)

1.01 (0.32-3.17)

0.97 (0.79-1.92)

36 (58.1%)

23 (37.1%)

3 (4.8%)

1.06 (0.54-2.09)

2.72 (0.64-11.55)

0.81 (0.41-1.62)

 G3

124 (54.6%)

84 (37%)

19 (8.4%)

   

128 (56.4%)

81 (35.7%)

18 (7.9%)

   
  1. Bold value Indicates a significant difference at the 5% level
  2. aAdjusted for age, FIGO stage, histological type, and tumor grade
  3. b30 patients with missing tumor grade value removed