Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Primary Research
  • Open Access

miR-29b enhances prostate cancer cell invasion independently of MMP-2 expression

  • 1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Cancer Cell International201818:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-018-0516-0

©  The Author(s) 2018

  • Received: 3 December 2017
  • Accepted: 31 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The ability to metastasize is one of the most important characteristics of neoplastic cells. An imbalance between the action of some matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs drives the invasion process. Some studies have suggested that MMP-2 is involved in metastasis, while other studies have reported that collagen production by cancer cells might also contribute to motility. However, decreased expression of microRNA-29b (miR-29b), which may control MMP-2 and collagen gene expression, has been shown in prostate cancer (PCa). The objectives of the present study were to clarify whether MMP-2 as well as collagens I and III (encoded by COL1A1 and COL3A1, respectively) are controlled by miR-29b and to determine whether metastasis is altered by this relationship.

Methods

PCa DU145 and PC-3 cells were transfected with 100 μL of OPTI-MEM I containing 100 nmol of miR-29b (or its inhibitor) along with 1.5 μL of lipofectamine. Positive and negative controls were prepared using the same protocol. MMP-2, COL1A1 and COL3A1 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were evaluated via real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). For qRT-PCR, 6 × 104 cells were used. Invasion studies were conducted with Matrigel assays, which simulate invasion of the extracellular matrix by neoplastic cells. After transfection of 3 × 104 cells, invasion was allowed to proceed for 48 h. Invasive cells were counted under an optical microscope. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Results

MMP-2 mRNA was not expressed in DU145 cells after transfection with miR-29b. After transfection of cells with the miR-29b inhibitor, COL1A1 (p = 0.02) and COL3A1 (p = 0.06) mRNA expression was increased in DU145 cells, and a large number of transfected DU145 and PC3 cells invaded the Matrigel membrane.

Conclusions

In vitro studies showed that reducing the amount of miR-29b may lead to higher PCa cell invasion via a process that is independent of MMP-2. Collagen expression, controlled by miR-29b, may facilitate this motility process. Thus, the present study suggests that collagen production plays an active role in metastasis control and restoration of miR-29b levels may decrease metastasis. Altogether, these findings support further exploration of drug therapy targeting this aspect of the metastasis circuit.

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Matrix metalloproteinases
  • Collagen
  • microRNA

Background

Extracellular matrix (ECM) disruption by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is one of the key events in metastasis. MMPs are regulated not only by their natural inhibitors, tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs), but also at the post-transcriptional level by microRNAs (miRNAs). One of these MMPs is MMP-2, which may be involved in prostate cancer (PCa) progression and metastasis [1, 2].

However, there is evidence that interstitial collagen may be involved in metastasis, indicating an active role for the desmoplastic reaction observed in several cancers. Increased production of several types of collagens has been reported: type II and IV collagens were observed in osteosarcoma [3], collagen type V was produced at elevated levels by fibrosarcoma cells compared with its production in normal muscle cells [4], and increased production of collagens I and III was observed in ovarian carcinoma [5]. Additionally, researchers have reported that collagen expression can facilitate neoplastic cell spreading [6].

The COL1A1 and COL3A1 genes encode the alpha-1 chains of collagen types 1 and 3, respectively, which are present in most connective tissues. Type 1 collagen is present in almost 70% of the extracellular bone matrix. Previously, Steele et al. [7] reported that a single miRNA (miR-29b) regulates MMP-2, COL1A1 and COL3A1 genes, although an assay to evaluate metastasis was not employed. Subsequently, Ru et al. showed that miR-29b overexpression in PCa cell lines limits metastasis, but this study did not focus on collagen genes or MMP-2 and finally Yan et al. [8] employed only LnCaP cells to report that miR-29b upregulation inhibits metastasis and that MMP-2 was not involved in this issue. Therefore, the debate about the relationship between MMP-2, miR-29b, collagen genes and metastases still persists in PCa. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate in vitro whether transfection of PCa cell lines with miR-29b affects metastasis through modification of collagen and MMP-2 gene expression.

Method

MicroRNAs

mir-29b, anti-miR-29b and positive and negative controls (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) were diluted in a 10 μM stock solution and frozen at − 20 °C until further use. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Cell lines

The following cell lines were used: DU145 and PC3 (American Type Culture Collection—ATCC). The cells were cultured in DMEM or MEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Sigma Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell cultures were incubated at 37 °C in 95% air and 5% CO2.

Cell transfection

Lipofectamine-based transfection (siPORT NeoFX, Ambion, USA) was performed with 2.5 μL of a 10 μM miRNA stock solution of miR-29b or miR-29b inhibitor. Each inhibitor solution was diluted in 50 μL of OPTI-MEM and mixed with 1.5 μL of Lipofectamine also diluted in 50 mL of OPTI-MEM I. The transfection complex (100 μL) was placed in a 12-well culture plate and incubated for 24 h in CO2 at 37 °C. Positive and negative controls were employed in the study. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Total RNA and miRNA extraction

At 24 h after transfection, the cells were trypsinized, washed with 10% RPMI and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min. Total RNA and miRNA were extracted using a mirVana kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems). The purity and concentration of the miRNA and RNA were measured with a spectrophotometer (ND-1000, Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA) at wavelengths of 260 and 280 nm (A260/280).

Reverse transcription (RT)

Reverse transcription was performed using a TaqMan Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MMP-2 cDNA was synthesized with 5 ng of mRNA (High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit, Applied Biosystems) using reverse transcriptase and random primers.

For miRNA, the reaction was performed with Veriti equipment (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the following parameters: 30 min at 16 °C, 30 min at 42 °C and 5 min at 85 °C. The cDNA from RNA was obtained with same equipment using the following parameters: 10 min at 25 °C, 120 min at 37 °C and 5 min at 85 °C.

Real-time PCR

We used an ABI 7500 FAST thermocycler system to assess transfection efficacy and the expression of COL1A1/COL3A1 and MMP-2 genes under the following conditions: 0.5 µL of specific primer, 5 µL of TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, California, USA), 3.5 µL of nuclease-free water and 1 μL of cDNA. The PCR cycles were as follows: 2 min at 50 °C, 10 min at 95 °C, and 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C. The endogenous control was B2M for genes and RNU43 for miRNAs. The miRNA and target gene expression levels were obtained, and the relative quantification of the expression levels was determined using the 2−ΔΔct method [9].

Invasion assays

Using PC3 and DU145 cell lines, invasion was measured by counting the number of cells that invaded into the lower portion of Transwell chambers (Becton–Dickinson) with a pore size of 8 μm containing 50 mL of Matrigel diluted in serum-free culture medium (1:2). A total of 3 × 104 cells/mL in serum-free culture medium were seeded onto the Matrigel, and 750 μL of culture medium containing FBS (10%) was added to the lower chamber. The cells were maintained in a CO2 incubator for 24–32 h at 37 °C. The cells were fixed with formaldehyde in PBS (4%), stained with crystal violet solution (1%) in methanol and counted using an optical microscope at 20× magnification.

Results

MMP-2 gene expression

DU145 cells were transfected with miR-29b or its inhibitor. However, there was no MMP-2 amplification. We decided to extract total RNA from DU145 and PC3 cultured cell lines (without any transfection) and from a PCa tissue sample. The MMP-2 mRNA was amplified in the tissue samples but in neither of the cell lines.

COL1A1 and COL3A1 mRNA expression

In DU145 cell lines, miR-29b inhibition significantly increased COL1A1 (248%, p = 0.02, SD = 1.84) and COL3A1 mRNA levels (86%, p = 0.06, SD = 0.59). However, miR-29 overexpression did not change the expression of those mRNAs (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

qRT-PCR. There was significant expression of collagen genes after transfection of DU-145 cells with a miR-29b inhibitor. COL1A1 increased 248% (b) and COL3A1 86% (d) after miR-29b inhibition. However, miR-29b mimics showed no difference in collagen expression (a and c). The Y axis represent the relative expressions of COL1A1 and COL3A1 mRNAs

Matrigel assay

miR-29b inhibition increased the number of cells invading through the Matrigel membrane in both the DU145 (p = 0.04) and PC3 cell lines (p = 0.016) (Figs. 2, 3).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Matrigel experiment. The number of cells that crossed the Matrigel membrane was significantly higher in DU145 (a) and PC3 (b) cell lines after transfection with the miR-29b inhibitor

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Matrigel chamber photography. Visual representation of the increased invasion of DU145 cells after miR-29b inhibition

Discussion

Desmoplasia refers to interstitial collagen production in cancer. Collagen types I and III are two of the most important molecules that support tissue structure in solid organs. Decades ago, Waisman et al. [10] observed that the production of extracellular material was an important feature of granulosa-theca tumors, and the culture of chondrosarcoma cells provided evidence of increased collagen production compared to that in normal cells [11].

Richards et al. [12] studied the growth of normal and neoplastic mouse mammary cells on three different substrates: plastic, rat tail, and rat tail collagen. Increased cell growth was reported when collagen was used as a substrate, primarily because the cells produced a structure that resembled collagen IV and laminin. Further, these authors provided evidence that the cells could actively produce collagen, because CIS-OH-proline (which blocks collagen production) inhibited cell growth.

As epithelial cells change their environment, they acquire functions of stromal cells, and collagen production may be one consequence of this transformation [13]. Another example of the interaction between malignant cells and the extracellular environment was provided by Noel et al., who showed higher collagen production in cocultures of MCF7 malignant cells and fibroblasts on a substrate containing type I collagen [14]. However, these authors hypothesized that the collagen was produced not by malignant cells but by fibroblasts. One of the hypotheses regarding the collagen production in neoplastic diseases was that this event functions as an attempt to construct a barrier that can halt tumor spread. However, Hewitt et al. [15] reported that intense collagen production occurred at the center of colon malignancies, in contrast with that observed at the edge where the invasion occurred. These authors, as well as a study published by other authors [14], also considered collagen production by stromal cells. In pancreatic cancer, the desmoplastic reaction occurs with increased production of collagen types I and III, which are primarily stimulated by TGF-β from granulocytes, suggesting an interaction between malignant epithelial cells and the stroma [16]. In renal neoplasms, the myofibroblasts identified in the tumor capsule have high type I collagen mRNA expression, likely also induced by TGF-β [17].

Kaupilla et al. [5] investigated whether fibroblasts or epithelial cells were responsible for the production of collagen types I and III in ovarian cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas. These authors demonstrated through in situ hybridization that poorly differentiated tumors could produce type I and III collagens. These authors also highlighted that collagen mRNA does not always translate into fibrils, except in ovarian cancer.

In PCa, there is evidence of collagenous micronodule deposition in biopsy and prostatectomy samples [18]. Further, intense desmoplastic activity was observed in intermediate and high-grade PCa, which also showed increased expression of vimentin, IGF-1, MMP-2, FGF-2, c-Myc, PSCA and Era [19], and an intense reactive stroma has been reported to distinguish benign from malignant prostatic tissue [20]. Such findings highlight the importance of extracellular collagen as a microenvironment component that can enhance metastasis. In other words, changes in the ECM created by tissue fibrosis can enhance tumor progression [21].

Previous studies have shown that malignant cells have reduced levels of miR-29b [22], and other studies have demonstrated reduced miR-29b expression in prostate cell lines and human prostate adenocarcinoma tissues [23, 24].

miR-29b inhibition leads to increased expression of the collagen I, III and V genes in PCa, as reported by Steele et al. [7], and the present results are consistent with these findings. However, in the present study, we found that miR-29b inhibition leads to increased collagen gene expression and further augments metastasis. We would expect that the increased cell invasion in the Matrigel assay was due to MMP-2 overexpression promoted by miR-29b inhibition, because this miRNA was previously shown to control MMP-2. However, because we did not observe MMP-2 mRNA expression in the examined cell lines, it is possible that invasion occurred with collagen gene expression independently of MMP-2. One possible explanation was provided by the results of other studies showing that MMP-2 is primarily expressed by stromal cells, as evidenced by the low to absent MMP-2 levels found in conditioned medium of PCa epithelial cells determined by zymography, whereas stromal cells exhibited higher levels of this protein [25]. Another study conducted by Yan et al. reported decreased cell invasion after miR-29b overexpression only with LncaP cells and without modification of MMP-2 levels. Then, our results obtained with another cell line (DU145) are in line with them [8].

A limitation of the present study is that these results could be improved with ELISA or western blotting to confirm at the protein level the increased collagen production induced by miR-29b downregulation in PCa cells. Another question raised in the present study is whether COL1A1/COL3A1 forms fibrils or if these collagens act as molecules that activate the metastasis pathway. Independently, the observed behavior of PCa cells after miR-29b inhibition indicated increased metastatic potential.

Thus, the present study showed that miR-29b inhibition increases cell invasion, and the expression of COL1A1 and COL3A1 genes in PC3 and DU145 prostate cell lines is independent of MMP-2. Thus, collagen expression may play an active role in metastasis physiology.

Conclusions

Blockade of miR-29b leads to increased mRNA expression of type I (COL1A1) and type III (COL3A1) collagens and enhances the invasion of PC3 and DU145 cells lines in vitro. This finding provides a possible role for the desmoplastic reaction. This mechanism was independent of the expression of MMP-2, and therapies that restore miR-29b levels might be promising alternatives for controlling the metastatic pathway in PCa.

Abbreviations

MMP: 

matrix metalloproteinase

TIMP: 

tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase

PCa: 

prostate cancer

mRNA: 

messenger RNA

qRT-PCR: 

quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

ECM: 

extracellular matrix

miRNA: 

microRNA

miR-29b: 

microRNA 29b

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

RFI performed most of the experiments; NIA assisted with the cell culture; DRM assisted with the data interpretation; IAS assisted with the Matrigel experiments; KRL and JPJ revised the manuscript; GI contributed to the manuscript by performing the Matrigel experiments during his scientific initiation program; WCN and MS provided support with the laboratory equipment; and STR coordinated and guided the steps of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding was received from the State of Sao Paulo (FAPESP): 2012/21833-8; 2015/00845-6.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 455, 2° floor, room 2145, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
(2)
Uro-Oncology Group, Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School and Institute of Cancer Estate of Sao Paulo (ICESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil

References

  1. Stearns ME, Stearns M. Immunohistochemical studies of activated matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2a)expression in human prostate cancer. Oncol Res. 1996;8(2):63–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kanoh Y, Akahoshi T, Ohara T, Ohtani N, Mashiko T, Ohtani S, Egawa S, Baba S. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and prostate-specific antigen in localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Anticancer Res. 2002;22(3):1813–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lanzer WL, Liotta LA, Yee C, Azar HA, Costa J. Synthesis of pro-collagen type II by a xenotransplanted human chondroblastic osteosarcoma. Am J Pathol. 1981;104(3):217–26.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Asokan R, Reddy GK, Dhar SC. Neoplastic association of enhanced type V collagen production in rat fibrosarcoma. Mol Cell Biochem. 1993;120(1):25–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kauppila S, Saarela J, Stenback F, Risteli J, Kauppila A, Risteli L. Expression of mRNAs for type I and type III procollagens in serous ovarian cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas. Am J Pathol. 1996;148(2):539–48.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox TR, Bird D, Baker AM, Barker HE, Ho MW, Lang G, Erler JT. LOX-mediated collagen crosslinking is responsible for fibrosis-enhanced metastasis. Cancer Res. 2013;73(6):1721–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Steele R, Mott JL, Ray RB. MBP-1 upregulates miR-29b that represses Mcl-1, collagens, and matrix-metalloproteinase-2 in prostate cancer cells. Genes Cancer. 2010;1(4):381–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Yan B, Guo Q, Nan XX, Wang Z, Yin Z, Yi L, Wei YB, Gao YL, Zhou KQ, Yang JR. Micro-ribonucleic acid 29b inhibits cell proliferation and invasion and enhances cell apoptosis and chemotherapy effects of cisplatin via targeting of DNMT3b and AKT3 in prostate cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:557–65.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Waisman J, Lischke JH, Mwasi LM, Dignam WJ. The ultrastructure of a feminizing granulosa-theca tumor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;123(2):147–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Miller DR, Treadwell BV, Mankin HJ. De novo protein synthesis by human chondrosarcoma in cell and organ culture: evidence of unusually high collagen production by a neoplastic tissue. Connect Tissue Res. 1980;8(1):9–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Richards J, Pasco D, Yang J, Guzman R, Nandi S. Comparison of the growth of normal and neoplastic mouse mammary cells on plastic, on collagen gels and in collagen gels. Exp Cell Res. 1983;146(1):1–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Adams AT, Auersperg N. A cell line, ROSE 199, derived from normal rat ovarian surface epithelium. Exp Cell Biol. 1985;53(4):181–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Noel A, Munaut C, Nusgens B, Foidart JM, Lapiere CM. The stimulation of fibroblasts’ collagen synthesis by neoplastic cells is modulated by the extracellular matrix. Matrix. 1992;12(3):213–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hewitt RE, Powe DG, Carter GI, Turner DR. Desmoplasia and its relevance to colorectal tumour invasion. Int J Cancer. 1993;53(1):62–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Aoyagi Y, Oda T, Kinoshita T, Nakahashi C, Hasebe T, Ohkohchi N, Ochiai A. Overexpression of TGF-beta by infiltrated granulocytes correlates with the expression of collagen mRNA in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(7):1316–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Shimasaki N, Kuroda N, Guo L, Jin Y, Miyazaki E, Hayashi Y, Toi M, Hiroi M, Enzan H, Shuin T. The participation of myofibroblasts in the capsular formation of human conventional and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Histol Histopathol. 2005;20(1):67–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bostwick DG, Wollan P, Adlakha K. Collagenous micronodules in prostate cancer. A specific but infrequent diagnostic finding. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119(5):444–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Silva MM, Matheus WE, Garcia PV, Stopiglia RM, Billis A, Ferreira U, Fávaro WJ. Characterization of reactive stroma in prostate cancer: involvement of growth factors, metalloproteinase matrix, sexual hormones receptors and prostatic stem cells. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(5):849–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tomas D, Kruslin B. The potential value of (Myo)fibroblastic stromal reaction in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostate. 2004;61(4):324–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cox TR, Erler JT. Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4(2):165–78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmitt MJ, Margue C, Behrmann I, Kreis S. MiRNA-29: a microRNA family with tumor-suppressing and immune-modulating properties. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13(4):572–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ru P, Steele R, Newhall P, Phillips NJ, Toth K, Ray RB. miRNA-29b suppresses prostate cancer metastasis by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(5):1166–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Katz B, Reis ST, Viana NI, Morais DR, Moura CM, Dip N, Silva IA, Iscaife A, Srougi M, Leite KR. Comprehensive study of gene and microRNA expression related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e113700.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson MJ, Sellers RG, Wiehr C, Melamud O, Pei D, Peehl DM. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and -2, in primary cultures of human prostatic stromal and epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol. 2002;191(2):208–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us