Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between MALAT1 expression and overall survival

From: Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of long noncoding RNA MALAT1 in human cancers: a review and meta-analysis

Survival analysis

Subgroup

Studies (n)

Patients (n)

HR (95% CI)

P

Heterogeneity (I2, P)

Univariate

Overall

15

1869

2.296 (1.716–3.072)

0.000

67.6%, 0.000

Region

China

12

1209

2.793 (2.310–3.376)

0.000

0.0%, 0.924

Other

3

660

1.164 (0.577–2.346)

0.672

83.5%, 0.002

Cancer type

Estrogen-dependent carcinoma

2

198

3.296 (2.027–5.358)

0.000

22.9%, 0.255

Urological carcinoma

2

226

3.184 (2.072–4.892)

0.000

0.0%, 0.739

Glioma

2

258

2.750 (1.839–4.111)

0.000

0.0%, 0.553

Digestive carcinoma

6

633

1.750 (0.974–3.143)

0.061

79.7%, 0.000

Other

3

554

2.154 (1.471–3.154)

0.000

0.0%, 0.484

Sample size

Sample < 100

5

333

2.443 (1.655–3.608)

0.000

0.0%, 0.752

Sample > 100

10

1536

2.203 (1.516–3.202

0.000

77.9%, 0.000

Multivariate

Overall

18

1891

2.298 (1.953–2.704)

0.000

17.2%, 0.248

Region

China

17

1817

2.327 (1.968–2.751)

0.000

20.6%, 0.213

Other

1

74

1.880 (0.957–3.695)

0.067

–

Cancer type

Estrogen-dependent carcinoma

2

198

2.656 (1.560–4.523)

0.000

0.0%, 0.457

Urological carcinoma

3

321

1.952 (1.189–3.204)

0.008

51.4%, 0.128

Glioma

4

430

2.315 (1.643–3.263)

0.000

0.0%, 0.534

Digestive carcinoma

7

706

2.451 (1.862–3.227)

0.000

45.4%, 0.089

Other

2

236

2.383 (1.449–3.920)

0.001

3.3%, 0.309

Sample size

Sample < 100

7

528

2.017 (1.520–2.677)

0.000

10.4%, 0.350

Sample > 100

11

1363

2.451 (2.009–2.990)

0.000

20.7%, 0.246

  1. If I2 > 50%, the results were calculated by random model
  2. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval