Skip to main content

PIK3CA-CDKN2A clonal evolution in metastatic breast cancer and multiple points cell-free DNA analysis

Abstract

Background

Daily experience tells us that breast cancer can be controlled using standard protocols up to the advent of a relapse. Now new frontiers in precision medicine like liquid biopsy of cell free DNA (cfDNA) give us the possibility to understand cancer evolution and pick up the key mutation on specific cancer driver gene. However, tight schedule of standardized protocol may impair the use of personalized experimental drugs in a timely therapeutic window.

Main body

Here, using a combination of deep next generation sequencing and cfDNA liquid biopsy, we demonstrated that it is possible to monitor cancer relapse over time. We showed for the first time the exact correspondence from the increasing clonal expansion and clinical worsening of metastatic breast cancer.

Conclusion

Thanks to liquid biopsy may be possible to introduce new experimental drugs in the correct therapeutic window which would lead in the near future to an effective treatment which otherwise remains challenging.

Background

Melchardt et al. 2018 demonstrated that clones in distant relapse of head and neck cancer are different in respect to those identified at the beginning in tumor biopsy [1]. Classically, haematological malignancies have taught us that, within the dynamic clonal evolution, a subclonal expansion of a pre-existing mutated clone leads often to relapse [2, 3]. Expanding clones may be selected by treatment acquiring drug resistance and patients who relapse after an effective therapy usually have a poor prognosis [4, 5]. While at the beginning of tumor expansion there is a consistent, although variable, mutational burden from ten to hundred clones, at relapse the leading clone is usually only one [5]. Liquid biopsy of cell free DNA (cfDNA) has now the potential to follow the temporal evolution and to inform us about the driver mutation of the expanded clone. Among solid tumors, breast cancer is one of the most facing a high risk of recurrence after curative surgery and therapeutic treatment. PIK3CA mutations are found in 27% of cases of disease progression in breast cancer [6]. Free survival was demonstrated to be inversely correlated with PIK3CA mutations at liquid biopsy [7] but longitudinal analysis of clonal evolution and disease progression was missed.

Main text

Using a combination of deep next generation sequencing and cfDNA liquid biopsy (Oncomine pan-cancer cell free assay and tissues/blood custom panels on ion proton platform, life technologies), we showed for the first time the exact correspondence between the increasing clonal expansion and the clinical worsening of metastatic breast cancer in a 44-year-old female with disease recurrence after 4 years and half of disease control. At 38 years she presented a poorly differentiated ductal carcinoma of the right breast, pT1cN1mi(1/3) G3, estrogen receptor (ER) positive 90%, progesterone receptor (PgR) positive 40%, HER2 negative, KI67 40%. She underwent quadrantectomy and subsequent chemotherapy with Epirubicin Ciclofosfamide (EC) for four cycles and Decapeptyl every 28 days. After 7 months, she added tamoxifen for 1 year, then replaced by Exemestrane for 2 years. Radiotherapy was also performed. Family history was positive for breast cancer in the paternal side although exome analysis failed to reveal germline mutation in known cancer driver genes.

After 4 years and half from the diagnosis, liver and bone metastasis were detected. Biopsy of the VIII hepatic segment showed metastasis of breast carcinoma, ER negative, PgR negative, HER2 negative, Ki67 17%. Subsequently, therapy with Paclitaxel was undertaken weekly. Three months later from the previous evidence of metastasis, numerical and dimensional increase in liver lesions was demonstrated. Monotherapy with cisplatin was started and then in association with capecitabine and epirubicin (ECX scheme) with dose of 80% for seven consecutive cycles. Afterwards, she had treatment with Capecitabine and metronomic cyclophosphamide for 3 months, then three cycles of eribuline were performed. Therapy with carboplatin and gemcitabine was subsequently administered. One month later, since there was an increase of liver enzymes, monotherapy with carboplatin was undertaken. No other treatment options were available given the disease progression.

After about 1 year from the evidence of bones and liver metastasis, we performed a first cfDNA analysis, which revealed pathogenic mutations in PIK3CA gene [c.1633G>A; p.(Glu545Lys)] and CDKN2A [c.1904T>G; p.(Leu635Arg)]. Five months later, a second cfDNA analysis highlighted an exponential increase of clones with the same pathogenic mutations (Fig. 1). In comparison with the mutational burden identified at primary tumor biopsy, the expanding clone has a simplified architecture (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Outline of clonal and subclonal architecture and clinical outcome. Upper panel: fish plot of clonal evolution and timing. At the primary tumor biopsy, 10 different distinctive clones with different mutational load (ranging from 0.3 to 25%) were identified: IDH1 (green), CTNNB1 (pink), FBXW7 (yellow), APC (red), EGFR (beige), PIK3CA (blue), PTEN (brown), SMAD4 (grey), CDKN2A (blu), GNAS (light green). Among these, the clone-bearing PIK3CA/CDKN2A mutations (blue) increases from 25% at the time of primary tumor biopsy to around 50% at 180 days’ post-recurrence. Bottom panel: liver enzymes (AST = blue line; ALT = green line; values in U/L on the right) and bilirubin (red line; values in mg/dL on the left) whose values increase according to disease progression. CT chemotherapy; HT hormone therapy

We demonstrated here that multiple points cfDNA analysis give now the possibility to understand the overall cancer dynamics and pick up the key mutation leading to cancer recurrence, separating them from not expanding occasional clones. Large comprehensive analysis of haematological malignancies indicates a complex temporal dynamic landing although in few (from one to six) driver mutations at late relapse [8]. Likewise, in breast cancer one (or few) is the driver mutation leading to cancer recurrence and it is of pivotal importance to target this driver mutation(s) on time. However, stick too tightly to standardised protocol may impair the use of personalised experimental drugs in a timely therapeutic window.

Data reported here indicate that there is a tight therapeutic window useful for counteract final clonal expansion and that the minimally invasive cfDNA analysis allows a close and dynamic monitoring of clonal evolution. This is also supported by the mathematical model developed by Khan et al. [9]. In our case, an innovative and more effective therapy could be CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with PI3 K-specific inhibitor initiated at the beginning of the clonal expansion [10]. Introducing of experimental drug in the correct therapeutic window would lead in the near future to effective treatment which otherwise remain challenging.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrated that multiple points cfDNA analysis reflects clonal evolution and allows track the evolving molecular landscapes of growing cancer cells by capturing broader molecular alterations that could hinder targeted treatments efficacy. The shorter turnaround time of cfDNA analysis and its high sensitivity and specificity are key factors to provide novel opportunities for adaptive personalised therapies, optimizing healthcare resources and enabling higher treatment efficacy and lower side-effects.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CDKN2A:

cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A

CDK:

cyclin dependent kinase

cfDNA:

cell-free DNA

EC:

epirubicin ciclofosfamide

ECX:

epirubicin cisplatin and capecitabine

ER:

estrogen receptors

HER2:

human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

PgR:

progesterone receptor

PIK3CA:

phosphoinositide-3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide

References

  1. Melchardt T, Magnes T, Hufnagl C, Thorner AR, Ducar M, Neureiter D, et al. Clonal evolution and heterogeneity in metastatic head and neck cancer-an analysis of the Austrian Study Group of Medical Tumour Therapy study group. Eur J Cancer. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fouillet L, Daguenet E, Schein F, Tavernier E, Flandrin-Gresta P, Cornillon J. Clonal evolution of myelofibrosis treated with hematopoietic transplantation, using RUXOLITINIB for chronic GvHD: a case report. Curr Res Transl Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retram.2018.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinto AM, Papa FT, Frullanti E, Meloni I, Tita R, Caselli R, et al. Low-level TP53 mutational load antecedes clonal expansion in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghatalia P, Smith CH, Winer A, Gou J, Kiedrowski LA, Slifker M, et al. Clinical utilization pattern of liquid biopsies (LB) to detect actionable driver mutations, guide treatment decisions and monitor disease burden during treatment of 33 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) at a Fox Chase Cancer Center GI Oncology Subspecialty Clinic. Front Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacoby MA, Duncavage EJ, Chang GS, Miller CA, Shao J, Elliott K, et al. Subclones dominate at MDS progression following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. JCI Insight. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.98962.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JH, Jeong H, Choi JW, Oh HE, Kim YS. Liquid biopsy prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis, cancer recurrence, and patient survival in breast cancer. Medicine. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012862.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakauchi C, Kagara N, Shimazu K, Shimomura A, Naoi Y, Shimoda M, et al. Detection of TP53/PIK3CA mutations in cell-free plasma DNA from metastatic breast cancer patients using next generation sequencing. Clin Breast Cancer. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spinella JF, Richer C, Cassart P, Ouimet M, Healy J, Sinnett D. Mutational dynamics of early and late relapsed childhood ALL: rapid clonal expansion and long-term dormancy. Blood Advances. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2017011510.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan KH, Cunningham D, Werner B, Vlachogiannis G, Spiteri I, Heide T, et al. Longitudinal liquid biopsy and mathematical modeling of clonal evolution forecast time to treatment failure in the PROSPECT-C phase II colorectal cancer clinical trial. Cancer Discov. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gul A, Leyland-Jones B, Dey N, De P. A combination of the PI3 K pathway inhibitor plus cell cycle pathway inhibitor to combat endocrine resistance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a genomic algorithm-based treatment approach. Am J Cancer Res. 2018;8:2359–76.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The cell lines and DNA bank of Rett Syndrome, X-linked mental retardation and other genetic diseases, member of the Telethon Network of Genetic Biobanks (project no. GTB12001), funded by Telethon Italy, and the EuroBioBank network, provided us with specimens. Authors also thank the ERN-EURACAN (European network for Rare adult solid Cancer). We thank SienaGenTest srl, a Spin-off of the University of Siena (www.sienagentest.dbm.unisi.it) for bioinformatic analysis of genetic data.

Funding

Authors would thank for support Regione Toscana - Istituto Toscano Tumori (ITT) (Project “Identification of genetic bases of individual predisposition to lung cancer in non-smokers”) and from ASSO (Associazione per lo Sviluppo della Scienza Oncologica) onlus.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MP performed experiments on cfDNA and analysed the data and wrote the paper, FF, AF, took care of the clinical part of the study and wrote the paper, RT performed experiments on blood, tumoral tissue and metastasis, AR designed the research strategy, analysed the data and wrote the paper, EF analysed the data and wrote the paper, MB and MAM performed genetic counselling and provided patient samples, SM and GMC followed the patient as oncologist. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Renieri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was consistent with Institutional guidelines and approved by the ethical committees of Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Consent for publication

Consent was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmieri, M., Baldassarri, M., Fava, F. et al. PIK3CA-CDKN2A clonal evolution in metastatic breast cancer and multiple points cell-free DNA analysis. Cancer Cell Int 19, 274 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0991-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0991-y

Keywords