Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Primary research
  • Open access
  • Published:

Identification of novel biomarkers affecting the metastasis of colorectal cancer through bioinformatics analysis and validation through qRT-PCR

Cancer Cell International volume 20, Article number: 105 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Tumor progression and distant metastasis are the main causes of deaths in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and the molecular mechanisms in CRC metastasis have not been completely discovered.

Methods

We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and lncRNAs (DELs) of CRC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Then we conducted the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to investigate co-expression modules related with CRC metastasis. Gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, DEG-DEL co-expression network and survival analyses of significant modules were also conducted. Finally, the expressions of selected biomarkers were validated in cell lines by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).

Results

2032 DEGs and 487 DELs were involved the construction of WGCNA network, and greenyellow, turquoise and brown module were identified to have more significant correlation with CRC metastasis. GO and KEGG pathway analysis of these three modules have proven that the functions of DEGs were closely involved in many important processes in cancer pathogenesis. Through the DEG-DEL co-expression network, 12 DEGs and 2 DELs were considered as hub nodes. Besides, survival analysis showed that 30 DEGs were associated with the overall survival of CRC. Then 10 candidate biomarkers were chosen for validation and the expression of CA2, CHP2, SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 were significantly decreased in CRC cell lines when compared to normal human colonic epithelial cells, which were consistent with the results of differential expression analysis. Especially, low expression of SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 were closely correlated with poorer survival of CRC.

Conclusion

This study identified 5 genes as new biomarkers affecting the metastasis of CRC. Besides, SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 might be implicated in the prognosis of CRC patients.

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in broad areas of the world, accounting for nearly 1.2 million new patients and 600,000 deaths/year [1, 2]. It is reported that about 50–60% of patients with CRC die from distant metastasis [3]. Although multiple treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, have shown to reduce the relapse and improve the survival of CRC patients, the 5-year survival rate of this malignancy is still poor [4, 5]. Therefore, it is vital to uncover the critical new biomarkers and the underlying mechanisms associated with CRC metastasis.

So far, a variety of recent cancer profiling studies have focused on RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq), a rapidly maturing development of the next-generation sequencing technology. As one prominent example of the renowned public databases, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) provides a platform of RNA-Seq with mRNA, miRNA and lncRNA data of various cancers. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are defined as a class of transcripts with a length of more than 200 nucleotides, with limited potential of protein-coding capacity [6]. LncRNAs have mechanistically diverse functions in the cell, and in the nucleus have been shown to regulate gene expression either in cis or in trans by recruiting chromatin-modifying complexes to promoters of target genes [7, 8]. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) has been established as an effective data mining method for finding clusters or modules of highly correlated biomolecules and identifying intra modular “hubs”, including genes [9] miRNAs [10] and lncRNAs [11]. More importantly, WGCNA analyzes the relationships between modules and sample traits, which provides an effective way to explore the mechanisms behind certain traits [12]. In 2018, Zhou et al. [13] had conducted a WGCNA to predict pathological stage-related miRNA and gene modules of colon cancer. However, to the best of our knowledge, studies associated with gene and lncRNA modules of CRC metastasis have not been reported.

In this study, we successfully identified a set of differentially expression genes (DEGs) and lncRNAs (DELs) by integratively analyze RNA-Seq data of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) and rectal adenocarcinoma (READ) patients from TCGA database. Then based on the merged DEGs and DELs of COAD and READ, we conducted WGCNA and module-trait relationships to investigate significant modules related with CRC metastasis. Subsequently, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment of significant modules were conducted. In addition, DEG-DEL co-expression network and survival analysis of the top 100 nodes of significant modules were conducted to find important biomarkers. Finally, we chose 10 candidate biomarkers for validation in CRC cell lines and normal human colonic epithelial cells by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Thus, this comprehensive analysis might provide a meaningful contribution to exploring potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets of CRC metastasis at the transcriptomic level.

Materials and methods

Study design and data processing

The study design was showed in a flow diagram (Fig. 1), including TCGA-based RNA-seq data aggregation, multiple bioinformatics analysis and validation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of data processing, analysis and validation

Full size image

The RNA-seq data and the corresponding patient clinical data of COAD and READ patients was obtained from the TCGA database, which were derived from IlluminaHiSeq RNA-Seq platform. Patients with other tumors or patients without clinical information of metastasis were excluded. The mRNA and lncRNA expression data included a total of 401 COAD samples consisting of 336 metastasis and 65 non-metastasis samples, and a total of 154 READ samples consisting of 130 metastasis and 24 non-metastasis samples. No ethical issues were involved, because the sequencing data were obtained by using TCGA database.

Identification of DEGs and DELs

The limma package of R was used to screen the DEGs and DELs between COAD and READ metastasis, non-metastasis and normal samples, setting the false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05, fold change (FC) > 1.5 or FC < 0.5 and P < 0.05 as the cut-off criterion. These samples were divided into four groups: G1 (COAD metastasis vs. normal); G2 (COAD non-metastasis vs. normal); G3 (READ metastasis vs. normal); G4 (READ non-metastasis vs. normal). According to the TCGA project’s large-scale study of CRC specimens, the pattern of genomic alterations in CRC tissue is the same regardless of whether tumor origin is in the colon or the rectum, leading to the conclusion that these two cancer types can be grouped as one [14]. Thus, we obtained the merged datasets of COAD and READ as DEGs and DELs of CRC for WGCNA analysis.

Construction of WGCNA

In this study, the merged DEGs and DELs of CRC were applied to construct co-expression modules using “WGCNA” package in R [12]. The Pearson’s correlation matrices cor (i, j) which calculated the connection strength between each pair of retained DEGs and DELs from the corresponding expression levels was performed. Then a weighted adjacency matrix was computed as follows:

$${\text{a}}_{\text{ij}} = \left( {0.5 \times \left( {1 + {\text{cor}}\left( {{\text{i}},{\text{ j}}} \right)} \right)} \right)^{\upbeta} ,$$

where aij represented the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between nodes i and j. β was a soft-thresholding parameter that could emphasize strong correlations between nodes and penalize weak correlations [15]. Next, the topological overlap measure (TOM) representing the overlap in shared neighbors, was derived from the adjacency matrix, and the value (1 − TOM) was designated to the distance for identification of hierarchical clustering nodes and modules [16]. Clusters were obtained from the dendrogram by applying the dynamic tree cutting technique.

Identification of significant modules associated with CRC metastasis

The WGCNA algorithm uses module eigengenes (MEs) which were considered as the major component in the principal component analysis for each gene module to assess the potential correlation of gene modules with clinical traits. Information on the clinical characteristics (metastasis and non-metastasis) were selected as traits to identify significant co-expression module related with CRC metastasis. Module-trait relationships were calculated according to the correlation between modules and traits by Pearson’s correlation tests, and when P < 0.05 was defined to be significantly correlated. DEGs and DELs in significant modules were then exported for further analysis.

Functional enrichment analysis of significant modules

In significant modules, the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) was used to conduct GO and KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs. Enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways were identified with the cut-off criterion of P < 0.05.

Construction of DEG-DEL co-expression networks

To investigate the relationship between DEGs and DELs, we constructed the DEG-DEL co-expression networks based on the top 100 nodes of significant modules. Significant correlation pairs were used to construct the network based on Pearson correlation coefficients. Finally, the differential co-expression network graphs were visualized and analyzed using Cytoscape software (Version 3.5.1).

Survival analysis

Survival analysis of the top 100 DEGs and DELs in each significant modules were performed by using the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) database [17]. The Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted in the GEPIA database including 362 CRC patients. And according to the median risk score, CRC patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Cell culture

CRC cell lines HCT-8, SW1116 and DLD-1 and normal human colonic epithelia cell line (NCM460) were purchased from The Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All the cells were inoculated to RPMI-1640 culture solution complementary with 10% fetal bovine serum (ThermoScientific HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), and maintained at 37 °C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2, with liquid exchanging and passaging every 3–4 days.

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis of candidate biomarkers

HCT-8, SW1116, DLD-1and NCM460 cells RNA were extracted using R Neasy Purification Kit (Qiagen) (Cat. #74101, Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. RNA yield and purity were determined by measuring the absorbance (Abs) at 260 and 280 nm. Only RNA samples with Abs260 nm/Abs280 nm ratio > 1.8 were used. After that, the cDNA was synthesized using 1 μg of total RNA by ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo, China) and qRT-PCR was performed using 400 ng cDNA per 25 μl reaction. Gene-specific primers were designed using online primer designing tools primer-blast. The primer sequences are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 The primers for qRT-PCR
Full size table

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with R software 3.4.0 and SPSS 19.0. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for significance of differences between two groups. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Identification of DEGs and DELs

The heatmap of DEGs and DELs of these four groups were shown in Fig. 2. As these two cancer types can be grouped as one [14], we finally merged the intersecting datasets of COAD and READ as a whole of CRC. Before that, the intersection datasets of COAD and READ were obtained by selecting the intersection of G1 and G3, G2 and G4, respectively (Fig. 1). Thus, a total of 2032 DEGs including 1101 (54.2%) up-regulated and 931 (45.8%) down-regulated genes, and 487 DELs including 214 (43.9%) up-regulated and 273 (56.1%) down-regulated lncRNAs were obtained. Subsequently, we performed the following analysis based on this part of data.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Heatmap for hierarchical cluster analysis of DEG and DEL expression levels change between a, b COAD metastasis and normal tissues (G1); c, d COAD non-metastasis and normal tissues (G2); e, f READ metastasis and normal tissues (G3); g, h READ non-metastasis and normal tissues (G4). The red and green colors represent higher expression levels and lower expression levels of DEGs and DELs, respectively

Full size image

Construction of WGCNA network

Altogether, 2032 DEGs and 487 DELs were involved the construction of WGCNA network. Then the soft threshold was determined by scale independence and mean connectivity analysis of modules with different power values ranging from 1 to 20. In this study, when the power value (β) was set to 6, the scale independence value achieved 0.8 and lower mean connectivity (Fig. 3a, b). Thus, β = 6 was selected to produce a hierarchical clustering tree with different colors representing different modules. After putting all these DEGs and DELs with similar expression patterns into modules by average linkage clustering (Fig. 3c), a total 12 modules (MEpurple, MEred, MEgreenyellow, MEyellow, MEturquoise, MEgreen, MEpink, MEblue, MEblack, MEbrown, MEmagenta and MEgrey) with different DEGs and DELs were identified and displayed with different colors, the distribution of DEGs and DELs among these modules were summarized in Table 2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Scale independence and b mean connectivity analysis for various soft-thresholding powers. c Clustering dendrogram of DEGs and DELs based on a dissimilarity measure (1 − TOM), with dissimilarity based on topological overlap. Each color below represents one co-expression module (gray represents unassigned DEGs and DELs)

Full size image
Table 2 The number of DEGs and DELs in the 12 modules
Full size table

Identification of significant modules associated with CRC metastasis

The eigengene adjacency network and hierarchical clustering dendrogram of the eigengenes were shown in Fig. 4a, b. Four modules (red, greenyellow, turquoise and brown) associated with CRC metastasis were identified by WGCNA analysis with P < 0.05. There were 91 DEGs and 32 DELs in a red module, 45 DEGs and 8 DELs in a greenyellow module, 570 DEGs and 89 DELs in a turquoise module, 222 DEGs and 28 DELs in a brown module (Table 1). Among them, the brown module was a positive module, the red, greenyellow and turquoise module were negative modules correlated with CRC metastasis (Fig. 4b). According to their P value, we chose the greenyellow, turquoise and brown module which had more significant correlation with CRC metastasis for further analysis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Hierarchical clustering of module and heatmap plot of the eigengene adjacencies. b Module-trait relationships. Each row corresponds to a module eigengene, column to a trait. The correlation coefficient (upper number) and corresponding P-value (lower number) in each cell resulted in the correlation between the gene module and the clinical trait. M0: cancer, non-metastasis; M1: cancer, metastasis

Full size image

Functional enrichment analysis of greenyellow, turquoise and brown modules

DEGs in the greenyellow, turquoise and brown module were used for GO analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis so as to explore the underlying biological process correlated to CRC metastasis. We could find that DEGs in greenyellow module significantly enriched in T cell costimulation, immune response and positive regulation of T cell proliferation. In the turquoise module, the DEGs were mainly enriched in negative regulation of cell proliferation, positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter and oxidation–reduction process. For the brown module, the DEGs were mainly involved in rRNA processing, cell proliferation and regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5
figure 5

GO (a) and KEGG pathway analysis (b) of DEGs in greenyellow, turquoise and brown modules

Full size image

The results of KEGG pathway analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly related to staphylococcus aureus infection, hematopoietic cell lineage and asthma in greenyellow module; metabolic pathways, mineral absorption and fatty acid degradation in turquoise module; ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes, RNA transport and cell cycle in the brown module (Fig. 5b).

Construction of the DEG-DEL co-expression network

DEG-DEL co-expression pattern were constructed based on the correlation analysis between the top 100 nodes (DEGs and DELs) of the turquoise, brown module and all of them in greenyellow module. A higher degree for one node meant that the node played a more important role in this network. In this study, nodes with degree more than 15 were considered as hub nodes. Among the three modules, there were 14 hub nodes were identified, including 12 DEGs (CA2, SLC4A4, CA4, TMEM236, CHP2, SLC26A3, SLC51B, TTI1, YTHDF1, GID8, NELFCD and CD4) and 2 DELs (RP11-396O20.2 and SNHG11) (Fig. 6) (Table 3).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Co-expression pattern of DEGs-DELs in greenyellow, turquoise and brown modules. The circular nodes indicate the DEGs, triangle nodes indicate DELs. Red represents upregulation, while green represents upregulation

Full size image
Table 3 Nodes with more than 15 connections in the DEG-DEL co-expression network
Full size table

Survival analysis

We performed Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the above-described DEGs and DELs of the three modules to examine whether they were associated with the outcome of CRC patients.We found that 30 DEGs were associated with the survival prognoses of CRC patients (P < 0.05). Especially, SULT1B1, CPT2, LRRC19, SLC26A3, ABCE1, C4orf19, AURKA, GPD1L and NR3C2 were the signiicant prognostic DEGs with P < 0.01. Unfortunately, no DELs were found to be associated with survival of CRC. More information about these survival-associated DEGs is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Validation of candidate biomarkers by qRT-PCR

In order to identify new potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets which may play more significant roles in CRC metastasis, we combined hub nodes (12 DEGs and 2 DELs) as well as survival-associated DEGs first. After we excluded some DEGs and DELs which have been reported in CRC, we finally chose the top 10 (CA2, CHP2, SLC51B, ITM2C, LRRC19, SULT1B1, SMPDL3A, MOGAT2, C1orf115 and RP11-396O20.2) as our candidate biomarkers for qRT-PCR validation in cell lines according to their differential expression levels.

As shown in Fig. 7, the expression levels of CA2, CHP2, SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 were significantly decreased in CRC cell lines compared with NCM460 (P < 0.001), which were consistent with the results of differential expression analysis, suggesting that the results were convincing (Fig. 7a–e). Moreover, low expression of SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 were closely correlated with poorer survival of CRC (Fig. 7f–h).

Fig. 7
figure 7

a–e qRT-PCR validation of the expression of CA2, CHP2, SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 in cell lines. f–h Survival analysis of SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115. The patients were stratified into high-level group and low-level group according to median expression. ***P < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

Tumor progression and distant metastasis are the main causes of deaths in CRC patients, and the processes of which are complicated that involve a series of complex genetic and epigenetic changes [18, 19]. Therefore, it is of great urgency to detect new molecules and the underlying mechanisms associated with CRC metastasis so as to provide potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets for CRC.

In this study, a total of 12 co-expression modules were constructed by WGCNA based on 2032 DEGs and 487 DELs to investigate metastasis-associated modules of CRC. The results showed that four modules were significantly associated with CRC metastasis. We finally selected greenyellow, turquoise and brown module which had more significant correlation with CRC metastasis for further analysis. DEGs in these three modules were majorly enriched in immune response, positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, cell proliferation, rRNA processing, etc. In addition, these DEGs were also involved in metabolic pathways, pathways in cancer, etc.

The co-expression networks of the three significant modules provided an insight of correlation between DEGs and DELs. Then 12 DEGs (CA2, SLC4A4, CA4, TMEM236, CHP2, SLC26A3, SLC51B, TTI1, YTHDF1, GID8, NELFCD and CD4) and 2 DELs (RP11-396O20.2 and SNHG11) which had higher connections with other nodes were considered as hub nodes. This means that these biomarkers might play an important role in the metastasis mechanism of CRC. After that, we conducted survival analysis of the above-described nodes to determine valuable predictive factors for CRC patient’s survival. Then we illustrated that 30 DEGs were significantly associated with the overall survival time. Moreover, based on the hub nodes and survival-associated DEGs, we selected 9 genes (CA2, CHP2, SLC51B, ITM2C, LRRC19, SULT1B1, SMPDL3A, MOGAT2 and C1orf115) and 1 lncRNA (RP11-396O20.2) for validation. Finally, CA2, CHP2, SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 were successfully validated with their low expression in CRC cell lines, while the only lncRNA (RP11-396O20.2) we chose failed to be verified. Among them, the low expression of SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 were closely correlated with poorer survival of CRC.

Carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2) encodes one of isozymes of carbonic anhydrase which catalyzes reversible hydration of carbon dioxide and plays a pivotal role in tissue pH homeostasis [20]. The expression of CA2 remains controversial in different cancers, it was reported to be upregulated in urinary bladder cancers [21], and CA2 autoantibody titers in gastric cancer patients were found higher compared to healthy subjects [22], while in esophageal adenocarcinoma, its expression was downregulated [23]. A previous study [24] conducted integrated bioinformatics analysis has found that lower expression of CA2 had a shorter overall survival compared to those with higher expression in COAD patients, its RNA and protein expression level were also validated in TCGA and the Human Protein Atlas, but without any experimental validation. And their study did not involve the data of READ as well as the association with metastasis of CRC. For our study, we successfully verified that low expression of CA2 might play roles in the metastasis mechanism of CRC. calcineurin homologous protein isoform 2 (CHP2) is expressed in normal intestinal epithelia and also epithelium-like cell line [25], and it might act as a potential role in transmembrane Nat/Ht exchange which can protect cells from serum deprivation induced death [25, 26]. The expression of CHP2 has been reported to be significantly increased in human ovarian carcinoma cells [27] and leukemia primary cells [28] and breast cancer cells [29]. Mechanistically, overexpression of CHP2 activated AKT signaling and suppressed the transactivation of the forkhead box O3 (FOXO3/FOXO3a) transcription factor in breast cancer [29]. Besides, a study conducted 10‑gene signature including CHP2 found that high expression of CHP2 was associated with the recurrence of COAD [30]. While our results identified CHP2 was lower expressed in CRC cell lines, which was constant with the results of TCGA.

SULT sulfotransferase (SULT), a family of the enzymes catalyzing sulfonation of a variety of endogenous and exogenous substrates, comprises membrane-bound and cytosolic SULTs [31, 32]. SULT1B1 is expressed at highest levels throughout the human colon and small intestine but can also be found at moderate levels in human liver, kidney, and white blood cells [33, 34], and it is thought to be related to carcinogenesis [35]. The copy number variations of SULT1B1 significantly decreased in T4 than T1, 2 and 3 in CRC patients, and repression of SULT1B1 along with repression of UGT2B28 in CRC is thought to be related to tissue dedifferentiation [36]. As a CRC metastasis-associated gene considered in our study, we not only found that the mRNA level of SULT1B1 were decreased in CRC cell lines, but also identified its low expression was associated with a bad survival of CRC patients. Monoacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2 (MOGAT2) is a member of MOGAT gene family, plays an important role in catalyzing the metabolism of triglycerides and is highly conserved in organisms. And MOGAT2 was found to have different degrees of copy number amplification and deletion in the 16 yak populations [37]. Besides, rs499974 of MOGAT2 might be relevant for the risk of type 2 diabetes through single variant analyses [38]. Moreover, MOGAT2 were identified as a differentially methylated gene in inflammatory breast cancer [39]. Chromosome 1 open reading frame 115 (C1orf115) is broadly expressed in small intestine, duodenum and 23 other tissues. C1orf115 was identified to be associated with significant changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) values in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients for long-acting muscarinic antagonist treatment [40]. Beyond that, little is known about the roles of MOGAT2 and C1orf115 in human cancers.

Conclusion

In summary, three modules were regarded as the most significant modules in the metastasis of CRC. Besides, CA2, CHP2, SULT1B1, MOGAT2 and C1orf115 might play important roles in the metastasis and prognosis of CRC. However, further studies are still needed to completely elucidate the biological functions of these genes and to confirm the molecular mechanisms on the development of CRC.

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Abbreviations

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

RNA-Seq:

RNA-sequencing

TCGA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas

WGCNA:

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

DELs:

Differentially expressed lncRNAs

COAD:

Colon adenocarcinoma

READ:

Rectal adenocarcinoma

GO:

Gene ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time PCR

FC:

Fold change

FDR:

False discovery rate

TOM:

The topological overlap measure

ME:

Module eigengene

DAVID:

Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery

GEPIA:

The Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database

CA2:

Carbonic anhydrase 2

CHP2:

Calcineurin homologous protein isoform 2

SULT:

SULT sulfotransferase

MOGAT2:

Monoacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2

C1orf115:

Chromosome 1 open reading frame 115

FEV1:

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

References

  1. Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1490–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Landreau P, Drouillard A, Launoy G, Ortega-Deballon P, Jooste V, Lepage C, Faivre J, Facy O, Bouvier AM. Incidence and survival in late liver metastases of colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(1):82–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel RL, Miller KD. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W, Kandimalla R, Huang H, Zhu L, Li Y, Gao F, Goel A, Wang X. Molecular subtyping of colorectal cancer: recent progress, new challenges and emerging opportunities. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019;55:37–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagano T, Fraser P. No-nonsense functions for long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2011;145(2):178–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, Tsai MC, Hung T, Argani P, Rinn JL, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464(7291):1071–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Trimarchi T, Bilal E, Ntziachristos P, Fabbri G, Dalla-Favera R, Tsirigos A, Aifantis I. Genome-wide mapping and characterization of Notch-regulated long noncoding RNAs in acute leukemia. Cell. 2014;158(3):593–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang Y, Ke ZP, Peng YG. Co-expression analysis reveals key gene modules and pathway of human coronary heart disease. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(2):2102–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giulietti M, Occhipinti G, Principato G, Piva F. Identification of candidate miRNA biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Cell Oncol. 2017;40(2):181–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Esposti DD, Hernandez-Vargas H, Voegele C, Fernandez-Jimenez N, Forey N, Bancel B, Le Calvez-Kelm F, McKay J, Merle P, Herceg Z. Identification of novel long non-coding RNAs deregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma using RNA-sequencing. Oncotarget. 2016;7(22):31862–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou XG, Huang XL, Liang SY, Tang SM, Wu SK, Huang TT, Mo ZN, Wang QY. Identifying miRNA and gene modules of colon cancer associated with pathological stage by weighted gene co-expression network analysis. OncoTargets Ther. 2018;11:2815–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Network Cancer Genome Atlas. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487(7407):330–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou Z, Cheng Y, Jiang Y, Liu S, Zhang M, Liu J, Zhao Q. Ten hub genes associated with progression and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma identified by co-expression analysis. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14(2):124–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang X, Li G, Luo Q, Xie J, Gan C. Integrated TCGA analysis implicates lncRNA CTB-193M12.5 as a prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2018;18:27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science. 2011;331(6024):1559–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244(2):254–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu J, Zhang J, Shan F, Wen J, Wang Y. SSTR5AS1 functions as a ceRNA to regulate CA2 by sponging miR15b5p for the development and prognosis of HBV related hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20(6):5021–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tachibana H, Gi M, Kato M, Yamano S, Fujioka M, Kakehashi A, Hirayama Y, Koyama Y, Tamada S, Nakatani T, et al. Carbonic anhydrase 2 is a novel invasion-associated factor in urinary bladder cancers. Cancer Sci. 2017;108(3):331–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mentese A, Fidan E, Alver A, Demir S, Yaman SO, Sumer A, Fidan S, Kavgaci H, Turan I. Detection of autoantibodies against carbonic anhydrase I and II in the plasma of patients with gastric cancer. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2017;42(1):73–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nortunen M, Huhta H, Helminen O, Parkkila S, Kauppila JH, Karttunen TJ, Saarnio J. Carbonic anhydrases II, IX, and XII in Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2018;473(5):567–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang H, Wu J, Zhang J, Yang Z, Jin W, Li Y, Jin L, Yin L, Liu H, Wang Z. Integrated bioinformatics analysis of key genes involved in progress of colon cancer. Mol Genet. 2019;7(4):e00588.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Inoue H, Nakamura Y, Nagita M, Takai T, Masuda M, Nakamura N, Kanazawa H. Calcineurin homologous protein isoform 2 (CHP2), Na+/H+ exchangers-binding protein, is expressed in intestinal epithelium. Biol Pharm Bull. 2003;26(2):148–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Sole F, Vadnagara K, Moe OW, Babich V. Calcineurin homologous protein: a multifunctional Ca2+-binding protein family. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012;303(2):F165–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jin Q, Kong B, Yang X, Cui B, Wei Y, Yang Q. Overexpression of CHP2 enhances tumor cell growth, invasion and metastasis in ovarian cancer. In Vivo. 2007;21(4):593–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hammam AA, Eissa HH, El Masry MR, Mahmoud S. CHP2 gene expression and quantitation in Egyptian patients with acute leukemia. Meta Gene. 2014;2:323–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao X, Xie T, Dai T, Zhao W, Li J, Xu R, Jiang C, Li P, Deng J, Su X, et al. CHP2 promotes cell proliferation in breast cancer via suppression of FOXO3a. Mol Cancer Res. 2018;16(10):1512–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumamoto K, Nakachi Y, Mizuno Y, Yokoyama M, Ishibashi K, Kosugi C, Koda K, Kobayashi M, Tanakaya K, Matsunami T, et al. Expressions of 10 genes as candidate predictors of recurrence in stage III colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Oncol Lett. 2019;18(2):1388–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gamage N, Barnett A, Hempel N, Duggleby RG, Windmill KF, Martin JL, McManus ME. Human sulfotransferases and their role in chemical metabolism. Toxicol Sci. 2006;90(1):5–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindsay J, Wang LL, Li Y, Zhou SF. Structure, function and polymorphism of human cytosolic sulfotransferases. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9(2):99–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Riches Z, Stanley EL, Bloomer JC, Coughtrie MW. Quantitative evaluation of the expression and activity of five major sulfotransferases (SULTs) in human tissues: the SULT “pie”. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;37(11):2255–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang J, Falany JL, Falany CN. Expression and characterization of a novel thyroid hormone-sulfating form of cytosolic sulfotransferase from human liver. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;53(2):274–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Enokizono J, Kusuhara H, Sugiyama Y. Regional expression and activity of breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp/Abcg2) in mouse intestine: overlapping distribution with sulfotransferases. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007;35(6):922–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoshida T, Kobayashi T, Itoda M, Muto T, Miyaguchi K, Mogushi K, Shoji S, Shimokawa K, Iida S, Uetake H, et al. Clinical omics analysis of colorectal cancer incorporating copy number aberrations and gene expression data. Cancer Inform. 2010;9:147–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang H, Chai Z, Hu D, Ji Q, Xin J, Zhang C, Zhong J. A global analysis of CNVs in diverse yak populations using whole-genome resequencing. BMC Genom. 2019;20(1):61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jager S, Wahl S, Kroger J, Sharma S, Hoffmann P. Genetic variants including markers from the exome chip and metabolite traits of type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Van der Auwera I, Yu W, Suo L, Van Neste L, van Dam P, Van Marck EA, Pauwels P, Vermeulen PB, Dirix LY, Van Laere SJ. Array-based DNA methylation profiling for breast cancer subtype discrimination. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(9):e12616.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kang J, Kim KT, Lee JH, Kim EK, Kim TH, Yoo KH, Lee JS, Kim WJ, Kim JH, Oh YM. Predicting treatable traits for long-acting bronchodilators in patients with stable COPD. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017;12:3557–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Scientific and Technological Project of Henan province (No. 2018020578).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wenping Lian and Huifang Jin equally contributed to this article

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Henan No. 3 Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450006, Henan, China

    Wenping Lian, Shuai Zhao, Sujun Wu & Mengle Peng

  2. Department of Blood Transfusion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China

    Huifang Jin

  3. Department of Basis Medicine, Henan Medical College, Zhengzhou, 451191, Henan, China

    Jingjing Cao

  4. Department of Medical Affair, Henan No. 3 Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450006, Henan, China

    Xinyu Zhang

  5. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhecheng People’s Hospital, Shangqiu, 476000, Henan, China

    Tao Zhu

  6. Medical College of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China

    Kailu Zou

  7. Department of Anorectal Surgery, Henan No. 3 Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450006, Henan, China

    Xinyun Zhang

  8. Henan Province Engineering Laboratory for Clinical Evaluation Technology of Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450000, China

    Mingliang Zhang

  9. Department of Digestion, Henan No. 3 Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450006, Henan, China

    Xiaoyong Zheng

Authors
  1. Wenping Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huifang Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jingjing Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinyu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tao Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shuai Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sujun Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kailu Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xinyun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mingliang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xiaoyong Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mengle Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WL and MP designed the experiments. HJ, JC, MP and MZ performed the statistical analysis. XZ, TZ, SZ, SW, KZ and XZ participated in coordination of the study, interpretation of results. WL, HJ, and MP wrote the manuscript. MP was in charge of all experimental procedures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengle Peng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 30 DEGs (ABCE1, ADAMDEC1, AURKA, C1orf115, C4orf19, CEACAM7, CLDN23, CPT2, CSTF1, DARS, DDX21, ENTPD5, ETFDH, GNL3, GPD1L, GRAMD3, HDAC2, ITM2C, LRRC19, MOGAT2, NIFK, NR3C2, PLAGL2, RBM47, RSL1D1, SLC4A4, SLC26A3, SMPDL3A, SULT1B1 and TMEM236) in greenyellow, turquoise and brown modules.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lian, W., Jin, H., Cao, J. et al. Identification of novel biomarkers affecting the metastasis of colorectal cancer through bioinformatics analysis and validation through qRT-PCR. Cancer Cell Int 20, 105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01180-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01180-4

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us