Skip to main content

Mitophagy in carcinogenesis, drug resistance and anticancer therapeutics

Abstract

The mitochondrion is an organelle that plays a vital role in energy production, cytoplasmic protein degradation and cell death. Mitophagy is an autophagic procedure that specifically clears damaged mitochondria and maintains its homeostasis. Emerging evidence indicates that mitophagy is involved in many physiological processes, including cellular homeostasis, cellular differentiation and nerve protection. In this review, we describe the regulatory mechanisms of mitophagy in mammals and yeasts and highlight the recent advances relevant to its function in carcinogenesis and drug resistance. Finally, a section has been dedicated to describing the role of mitophagy in anticancer therapeutics, which is a new frontier that offers a precise and promising strategy.

Background

The stability of mitochondria is essential for cellular homeostasis and diverse cellular functions [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Apart from the well-known role of intracellular energy factories through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) [1, 2], mitochondria are the organelles responsible for the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cytoplasmic protein degradation [3], maintenance of calcium homeostasis [4], heme biosynthesis [5], apoptotic activation [6] and innate immunity through mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS) [7].

Autophagy is an important process in cells for degrading proteins and organelles in a lysosome-dependent manner. Mitophagy refers to the process of degrading mitochondria through selective autophagy [8,9,10]. The concept of mitophagy was first proposed by the Lemasters group in 2005 [8]. Under the conditions of ROS stimulation, nutrition deficiency, and cell senescence, mitochondria undergo membrane potential depolarization [8, 11]. Cellular proteins and depolarized mitochondria are sequestered in autophagosomes. Subsequently, autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes to degrade these contents and maintain the stability of the intracellular environment and mitochondrial fitness [8]. However, under severe conditions, in which mitophagy cannot handle a large number of damaged or dysfunctional mitochondria, cell death pathways are activated, and mitophagy is suppressed [12]. In addition to eliminating damaged mitochondria, researchers have identified numerous physiological and pathophysiological functions of mitophagy. Mitophagy contributes to cell development and erythrocyte differentiation. In mammals, the differentiation of erythrocytes relies on the removal of mitochondria by mitophagy [13]. When knocking out the mitophagy-related gene BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3-like (BNIP3L) in mice, mitochondria accumulation occurs in erythrocytes, which results in anemia [14]. In adipocytes, mitophagy eliminates excessive mitochondria to promote a beige-to-white adipocyte transition [15]. Since mitophagy maintains mitochondrial homeostasis, it is not surprising that the dysregulation of mitophagy has a role in human diseases. In the brain tissue of Parkinson's disease patients, there are excessive dysfunctional mitochondria, and the mutation of PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) was identified in this tissue [16]. Then PINK1 is proven to be a mitophagy-related gene [17]. Additionally, a similar phenomenon is found in Alzheimer's disease patients, indicating that mitophagy plays a protective role in neurodegenerative diseases [18]. The occurrence and development of cancers is a complicated pathophysiological process, and the effect of mitophagy on cancers will be discussed later.

In this review, we present a brief introduction to the main mechanisms of mitophagy regulation. We also elucidated the roles of mitophagy in carcinogenesis, drug resistance and anticancer therapeutics.

Common mechanisms of mitophagy

Mitochondrial membrane receptors-mediated mitophagy

Mitochondrial membrane receptors mainly include BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3 (BNIP3), BNIP3L, FUN14 domain-containing protein 1 (FUNDC1), activating molecule in Beclin 1-regulated autophagy (AMBRA1), FK506-binding protein 8 (FKBP8), ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 3B (ATAD3B), and some kinds of lipids (cardiolipin (CL) and C18-ceramide). These mitochondrial receptors depend on microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3)-interacting region (LIR) motifs interacting with LC3 for mitochondrial clearance. They are regulated at the transcriptional or post transcriptional level under hypoxia and starvation conditions by kinases, phosphatases, glucocorticoids and other regulation factors.

BNIP3 and its homologous BNIP3L belong to the BH3-only protein family and induce cell death and mitophagy [19,20,21,22]. Upon stress conditions, BNIP3 and BNIP3L are integrated into the outer membrane of mitochondria in the form of a homodimer [23,24,25]. BNIP3 binds to LC3 by its LIR motif to induce mitophagy in various mammalian cells. Phosphorylation at Ser17 and Ser24 near the LIR motif is important for BNIP3-LC3 interactions [26]. The kinase or phosphatase responsible for the phosphorylation at Ser17 and Ser24 is not yet clear. BNIP3L shares a more than 50% amino acid sequence similarity with BNIP3 [21]. BNIP3L is a mitochondrial receptor mediating mitochondrial elimination during erythrocyte maturation [14, 22, 27]. Under hypoxic conditions or mitochondrial stress, BNIP3L interacts with ATG8 family proteins (GABARAP1/LC3A) through its LIR motif. The interaction between BNIP3L and GABARAP1/LC3A leads to depolarized mitochondrial clearance upon reticulocyte maturation [22, 28, 29]. In BNIP3L-deficient cells, autophagosomal formation is still functional, but mitochondria are unable to fuse with autophagosomes [13, 14, 22, 29] Mitophagy induced by BNIP3 and BNIP3L is regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) [30,31,32]. The upregulation of HIF-1α under hypoxic conditions can enhance the expression of BNIP3 by activating the transcription factor forkhead box O3 (FOXO3) [31]. Glucocorticoids repress PGC1α expression in a glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-dependent manner and mitigate BNIP3L-dependent mitophagy [33].

FUNDC1 plays a distinct role in eukaryotic cells from BNIP3 and BNIP3L. A possible explanation for this might be that FUNDC1 is a mitophagy assistant under hypoxic conditions. FUNDC1 interacts with LC3 through the LIR motif at the cytosol-exposed N-terminus for selective mitophagy to couple with the core autophagic machinery [34]. The phosphorylation of FUNDC1 at Tyr18 in the LIR motif by Src kinase inhibits mitophagy from occurring [34]. FUNDC1 can be ubiquitinated by membrane-associated ring-CH-type finger 5 (MARCH5) and degraded to avoid unnecessary mitochondrial clearance [35]. In addition, kinases such as casein kinase 2 (CK2) and Unc51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) and phosphatases such as phosphoglycerate mutase 5 (PGAM5) regulate the phosphorylation state of FUNDC1 and functionally cooperate to regulate mitophagy [34,35,36,37]. Collectively, the phosphorylation state of FUNDC1 dictates its affinity to LC3 and subsequently influences the activation of mitophagy. The PGC-1α-NRF1 pathway is a crucial regulator in mitochondrial biogenesis. PGC-1α and NRF1 also increase the expression of FUNDC1 to enhance mitophagy to promote mitochondrial turnover and maintain functional mitochondria [38]. Such a mechanism serves to maintain the balance between the quality and quantity of mitochondria.

Ambra1 can induce the depolarization of mitochondria which leads to functional mitophagy via a Parkin-independent pathway. Ambra1 binds to the E3 ubiquitin ligase HUWE1 to induce the ubiquitylation of mitofusin 2 (MFN2), a mitochondrial membrane protein, with an overall effect on mitophagy induction. After mitophagy induction, Ambra1 binds to LC3 to complete the autophagosome formation [39]. Ambra1 acts as an alternative mediator in PINK1/Parkin-mutant Parkinson's disease patients [39]. Ambra1 can also be recruited by Parkin during mitochondrial depolarization and activates class III PI3K to form autophagosomes around mitochondria [40].

CL, a kind of lipid located at the inner mitochondrial membrane, is involved in mitochondrial metabolism. Its externalization enables its interaction with LC3 to induce subsequent mitophagy to protect cells from apoptotic cell death. This pathway could be induced by rotenone, staurosporine, and 6-hydroxydopamine [41]. Additionally, Cers1 generates C18-ceramide, a bioactive sphingolipid, and mediates its localization on the membrane of the mitochondria. After mitochondrial fission by dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), ceramides interact with LC3B-II to induce mitophagy [42].

FKBP8 is anchored in the outer membrane of mitochondria and acts as a mitophagy receptor. It recruits LC3A by its LIR motif to damaged mitochondria to mediate Parkin-independent mitophagy [43]. ATAD3B, a mitochondrial receptor, interacts with LC3 to induce parkin-independent mitophagy under stress conditions. ATAD3B-induced mitophagy promotes the clearance of damaged mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) [44] (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
figure1

Mechanism of mitophagy regulation in mammals (A, C) and yeasts (B). A Mitophagy receptors mediate mitophagy under hypoxia or starvation in mammals. The proteins BNIP3, BNIP3L, FKBP8 and FUNDC1 on the outer member of mitochondria directly bind with LC3 through their LIR domains. Lipid CL externalizes from the inner mitochondrial membrane and interacts with LC3 to initiate mitophagy. B Atg proteins mediated mitophagy in yeasts. Under nitrogen starvation, the mitochondrial outer member receptor Atg32 is phosphorylated by CK2 and interacts with Atg8 or Atg11 to promote mitophagy. C PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy under mitochondrial depolarization in mammals. Mitochondrial stress blocks the internalization of PINK1. Accumulated PINK1 on the outer member of mitochondria recruits cytosolic Parkin to mitochondria and phosphorylates them. Then, the activated Parkin ubiquitinates the mitochondria outer member proteins such as Mfn1/Mfn2. Adaptors containing LIR motifs (e.g., p62, OPTN, NBR1) recognize these polyubiquitinated proteins and connect to autophagosomes via LC3

The phenomenon of mitophagy was first discovered in yeasts in 2005 [8]. Similar to BNIP3/BNIP3L/FUNDC1 in mammals, autophagy-related protein 32 (Atg32) is a mitochondrial receptor protein in the outer membrane of mitochondria with a classic tetrapeptide sequence W/Y/XXI/L/V in yeasts. Under nitrogen starvation, Atg32 is phosphorylated by CK2, especially at Ser114, and then its N-terminus binds to autophagy-related protein 11 (Atg11) [45,46,47,48]. The Atg32-Atg11 interaction is crucial for mitochondrial recruitment to the preautophagosomal structure (PAS) [47, 48]. The Atg32 cytoplasmic domain forms a conjugation with autophagy-related protein 8 (Atg8) by its conserved motif to accelerate the process of autophagosomes engulfing the mitochondria. The autophagosomes and lysosomes eventually fuse to clear these contents [49, 50] (Fig. 1B).

PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy

PINK1, an outer mitochondrial membrane protein, is sensitive to mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Parkin, named for its causal role in the pathogenesis of early-onset Parkinson's disease, is an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase comprising five conserved domains, UBL, RING0, RING1, IBR, and RING2 [51, 52]. Under basal conditions, PINK1 is transported from the cytosol to the mitochondrial matrix through mitochondrial translocases, led by its N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence. When crossing the inner mitochondrial membrane, PINK1 is cleaved by matrix processing peptidase (MPP), mitochondrial protease presenilin-associated rhomboid-like protein (PARL), and ATPase family gene 3-like protein 2 (AFG3L2). Then the cleaved form of PINK1 is released back to the cytosol and degraded through the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway [53,54,55]. When mitochondria are compromised and depolarized, PINK1 accumulates on their outer membrane and then recruits Parkin. PINK1 activates Parkin by phosphorylating Parkin on Thr175, Thr217, and Ser65 and thereby initiates mitophagy [56, 57]. Parkin ubiquitinates the mitochondrial proteins of the mitochondrial outer membrane (such as mitofusin 1 (Mfn1) and Mfn2) and promotes ubiquitin chain generation. PINK1 also phosphorylates ubiquitin at Ser65 to enhance the recruitment and activation of Parkin and thus constitutes a feed-forward mechanism to promote mitophagy [58,59,60] (Fig. 1C).

Several other ubiquitin-protein E3 ligases function in mitophagy in addition to Parkin. An E3 ligase called protein ariadne-1 homolog (ARIH1) is dependent on PINK1 to initiate mitophagy in the absence of Parkin [61]. Seven in absentia homolog 1 (SIAH-1), a conserved ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes mitophagy by forming the PINK1-synphilin-1-SIAH-1 complex in the absence of Parkin. Synphilin-1 is recruited to the damaged mitochondria by PINK1 to depolarize mitochondria and stabilize uncleaved PINK1. Synphilin-1 then recruits SIAH-1 to ubiquitinate mitochondrial proteins and promotes mitophagy [62].

BNIP3 and BNIP3L also recruit Parkin to the mitochondria. Parkin ubiquitinates multiple mitochondrial membrane proteins, including voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1), Mfn1 and mitochondrial Rho GTPase (MIRO), which subsequently interact with p62. The p62 adaptor interacts with LC3 to induce mitophagy [63, 64]. Additionally, PINK1 can be stabilized by BNIP3 in its full-length form, which promotes its ability to recruit Parkin subsequently [65].

Although there are interconnections between these mitophagy pathways, significant differences can be noticed between PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy and mitochondrial receptor-mediated mitophagy. The core mechanism of PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is the generation of ubiquitin chains recognized by autophagic receptors. However, mitochondrial receptors such as BNIP3 and FUNDC1 contain a conserved LIR motif and directly bind to LC3 on autophagosomes by the LIR motif.

The role of mitophagy in carcinogenesis, drug resistance and cancer therapeutics

Mitophagy and carcinogenesis

Mitophagy plays a multifaceted role in carcinogenesis and cancer progression. Whether it behaves as a tumor promoter or suppressor largely depends on the statuses and subtypes of cancer cells [66, 67]. Mitophagy can remove damaged or dysfunctional mitochondria to maintain the balance between the quality and quantity of mitochondria. After mitophagy, functional mitochondria generate less ROS and limit the tumor-initiating capacity of ROS [68]. On the other hand, once the tumors are already in progress, mitophagy can function as a cytoprotective method to guide tumor progression against chemotherapy-induced apoptosis [69, 70]. Functional mitophagy inhibits the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and prevents carcinogenesis. A study in mouse hepatic cancer reported that thyroid hormone T3 restrains carcinogenesis through activating the PINK1/Parkin pathway [71]. The PINK/Parkin pathway can induce mitophagy in liver cells, remove dysfunctional mitochondria and reduce ROS generation. The deletion or mutation of genes such as PARK2 and BNIP3 can cause mitophagy inhibition, thereby promoting carcinogenesis and cancer progression [72,73,74,75]. Loss-of-function mutations in PARK2 gene that encodes Parkin, have been detected in human colorectal cancer. The overexpression of Parkin can inhibit the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells. In PARK2 heterozygous deletion mice, intestinal cancer development is accelerated [72]. FUNDC1-mediated mitophagy also inhibits inflammasome activation and protects against liver carcinogenesis. After the specific depletion of FUNDC1 in liver cells, dysfunctional mitochondria accumulate and therefore trigger inflammasome activation and carcinogenesis [76].

Cancer stem cells (CSCs), which form only a small proportion of the tumor cell population are closely related to the carcinogenesis, invasion, and the drug resistance of cancer. CSCs act as the bottleneck that restricts anticancer therapeutics. Mitophagy serves as a pro-survival pathway for CSCs. For example, in hepatic cancer, mitophagy can maintain the stemness and self-renewal ability of CSCs. Mitophagy can promote p53 degradation, which is combined with mitochondrial clearance. The inhibition of mitophagy leads to p53 transfer into the nucleus and blocks NANOG expression. Without this vital maintaining factor of CSC stemness, the hepatic CSC population is downregulated [77]. ISGylation of Parkin by ubiquitin-like protein ISG15 in pancreatic cancer stem cells (PaCSCs) promotes mitophagy to maintain CSC self-renewal ability. Inhibition of ISG15 could result in reduced Parkin and impaired mitophagy, subsequently impairing PaCSC renewability and tumorigenesis capacity [70]. BNIP3L is highly expressed under hypoxic conditions. BNIP3L-mediated mitophagy promotes glioblastoma survival by clearing ROS and it may play a critical role in CSC maintenance [24].

Mitophagy and drug resistance

Certain chemotherapeutic drugs induce mitochondrial dysfunction, produce cytotoxic substances such as ROS, and influence normal metabolic activities [78,79,80,81]. Mitophagy is a cytoprotective process in the adaptation to chemotherapy drug treatment. Therefore, targeting mitochondria is regarded as a promising anticancer therapy.

Cisplatin is a widely used platinum-based compound that shows anticancer activity against various cancers. Cancers eventually develop resistance to cisplatin. Therefore, circumventing drug resistance is quite a challenge [61, 69, 82, 83]. Caveolin-1 (Cav-1)/Parkin-mediated mitophagy contributes to the resistance of the non-small cell lung cancer cell line A549 to cisplatin. The cav-1-knockdown A549 cells appear more sensitive to cisplatin because of the downregulated Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) and subsequently suppresses Parkin-mediated mitophagy [82]. Apurinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) plays an important role in the cisplatin resistance of A549 cells, and APE1 is overexpressed in A549 cells and induces Parkin-mediated mitophagy. The knockdown of APE1 restores cisplatin sensitivity and promotes cell apoptosis [83]. In addition, another E3 ubiquitin ligase, ARIH1, is essential for initiating PINK1-dependent mitophagy in the absence of Parkin. ARIH-induced mitophagy acts as a defense mechanism against cisplatin-induced A549 cell death. In ARIH1 knockout cells, cisplatin at the same dose dominantly affects cell growth [61].

A new derivative of betulinic acid (BA), B5G1, has potent anticancer activity toward multidrug-resistant cancer cells by the induction of mitochondrial apoptosis. However, B5G1 can induce mitophagy through the upregulation of PINK1 and subsequent Parkin recruitment. The inhibition of mitophagy by mitochondrial division inhibitor 1 (mdivi-1) or bafilomycin sensitizes drug-resistant cancer cells to B5G1 [81].

Doxorubicin, a DNA damaging agent, greatly influences cell survival by inducing cell death and mitochondrial dysfunction. However, in colorectal cancer, damaged mitochondria are cleared by BNIP3L-mediated mitophagy to reduce oxidative stress and facilitate cell survival. The inhibition of mitophagy by BNIP3L knockout significantly improves its sensitivity to doxorubicin [69].

Mitophagy as a target for anticancer therapeutics

Mitophagy promotes cell survival by adapting to stress, but it may lead to cell death due to excessive mitochondrial clearance. Therefore, mitophagy inducers and inhibitors may be equally effective in anticancer treatment.

The inhibition of mitophagy plays a pivotal role in downregulating the drug resistance of cancer cells [78, 84, 85]. In cervical cancer, drug resistance to cisplatin suppresses the efficacy of chemotherapy. Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) is an endogenous indoleamine and a famous antioxidant that reduces hypoxia–ischemia damage and improves sleep. It can also control tumor progression and inhibit mitophagy. Mechanistically, melatonin abates mitophagy by downregulating c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and subsequently Parkin, and it aggravates cervical cancer cell apoptosis [85]. In hepatic carcinoma, chemotherapeutic drugs such as cisplatin do not perform well in eliminating cancer cells due to inherent mitophagy and autophagy. Cisplatin activates dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) to enhance mitophagy. An inhibitor of DRP1-mediated mitophagy (mdivi-1) or a lysosome inhibitor (bafilomycin) increases the susceptibility of hepatic cancer cells to cisplatin rather than directly causing apoptosis [86]. Liensinine, an inhibitor of mitophagy, can markedly increase sensitivity to cisplatin in breast cancer. Liensinine inhibits mitophagy by suppressing the excessive accumulation of autophagosomes, autophagosome-lysosome fusion and the maturation of several important lysosomal hydrolases [87].

Enhanced mitophagy may lead to cell apoptosis due to insufficient functional mitochondria. Enhanced mitophagy can also provide a promising strategy for therapeutic intervention in other cancers. Ketoconazole, an oral antifungal agent, induces PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy by downregulating the expression of COX-2, which promotes the apoptosis of hepatic carcinoma cells [88]. In addition, sorafenib stimulates the apoptosis of liver cancer cells through PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy. It stabilizes PINK1 on the outer membrane of mitochondria and recruits Parkin to dysfunctional mitochondria to initiate mitophagy [89]. Two mitochondria-targeted drugs, Mito-CP and Mito-Metformin, release ULK1 from mTOR-mediated inhibition, decrease mitochondrial membrane potential, and abrogate colorectal cancer cell proliferation through mitophagy [90] (Table 1).

Table 1 Mitophagy inhibitors and inducers in anticancer therapeutics

Conclusions

With deep dissection of its role in carcinogenesis and drug resistance, mitophagy could become a breakthrough in cancer therapy. Whether these mitophagy inhibitors can be employed in clinical therapy for tumors? How to induce apoptosis of tumor cells rather than normal cells by regulation of mitophagy? In addition to endoplasmic reticulum stress, are there other organelles or physiological processes related to mitochondrial autophagy? Are there mitophagy inducers in specific tissues and cell types? How do normal cells sense the precisely regulated dynamic balance of mitochondria? A great deal of literature indicates that maintaining the balance between mitochondrial degradation and accumulation is essential for cellular homeostasis. Therefore, under certain conditions, the inhibition of mitophagy does more harm than good or has a slightly positive effect on the prognosis. As the energy factory of normal cells, the definitive role of mitochondria in cancer merits further systematic investigation. Identifying the precise role of mitophagy will provide an effective approach for mitophagy-based cancer therapy.

To develop new therapeutic strategies for rational anticancer therapy, further studies should pay more attention to the specific mechanisms of mitophagy in CSCs, such as the relationship between the amounts of mitochondria and the maintenance of CSCs. It is important to understand the interactions between oncogenic signaling pathways and mitophagy, the specific role of mitophagy in drug resistance, and the influences of mitophagy on different chemotherapeutic drugs. Mitophagy inducers or inhibitors should be delivered in a more targeted way. At the same time, with the development of novel drug therapies, it is important to be aware of the toxic effects derived from mitochondrial dysfunction and carefully consider them.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

OXPHOS:

Oxidative phosphorylation

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

MAVS:

Mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein

BNIP3L:

BCL2 protein-interacting protein 3-like

PINK1:

PTEN induced putative kinase 1

BNIP3:

BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3

FUNDC1:

FUN14 domain-containing protein 1

AMBRA1:

Activating Molecule in Beclin 1-Regulated Autophagy

FKBP8:

FK506-binding protein 8

ATAD3B:

ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 3B

CL:

Cardiolipin

LC3:

Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3

LIR:

LC3-interacting region

HIF-1α:

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha

FOXO3:

Forkhead box O3

GR:

Glucocorticoid receptor

MARCH5:

Membrane-associated ring-CH-type finger 5

CK2:

Casein Kinase 2

ULK1:

Unc51-like kinase 1

PGAM5:

Phosphoglycerate mutase 5

Mfn2:

Mitofusin 2

DRP1:

Dynamin-related protein 1

mtDNA:

Mitochondrial DNA

Atg32:

Autophagy-related protein 32

Atg11:

Autophagy-related protein 11

PAS:

Pre-autophagosomal structure

Atg8:

Autophagy-related protein 8

MPP:

Matrix processing peptidase

PARL:

Mitochondrial protease presenilin-associated rhomboid-like protein

AFG3L2:

ATPase family gene 3-like protein 2

Mfn1:

Mitofusin 1

ARIH1:

Protein ariadne-1 homolog

SIAH-1:

Seven in absentia homolog 1

VDAC1:

Voltage-dependent anion channel 1

MIRO:

Mitochondrial Rho GTPase

CSCs:

Cancer stem cells

PaCSCs:

Pancreatic cancer stem cells

Cav-1:

Caveolin-1

ROCK1:

Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 1

APE1:

Apurinic endonuclease 1

BA:

Betulinic acid

Mdivi-1:

Mitochondrial division inhibitor 1

JNK:

C-Jun N-terminal kinase

References

  1. 1.

    Lardy H, Ferguson S. Oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria. Annu Rev Biochem. 1969;38:991–1034.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wilson DF. Oxidative phosphorylation: unique regulatory mechanism and role in metabolic homeostasis. J Appl Physiol. 2017;122(3):611–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Heo JM, Livnat-Levanon N, Taylor EB, et al. A stress-responsive system for mitochondrial protein degradation. Mol Cell. 2010;40(3):465–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Robb-Gaspers LD, Burnett P, Rutter GA, et al. Integrating cytosolic calcium signals into mitochondrial metabolic responses. EMBO J. 1998;17(17):4987–5000.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ponka P. Tissue-specific regulation of iron metabolism and heme synthesis: distinct control mechanisms in erythroid cells. Blood. 1997;89(1):1–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Matsuyama S, Llopis J, Deveraux QL, et al. Changes in intramitochondrial and cytosolic pH: early events that modulate caspase activation during apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(6):318–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Seth R, Sun L, Ea C, et al. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF 3. Cell. 2005;122(5):669–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lemasters JJ. Selective mitochondrial autophagy, or mitophagy, as a targeted defense against oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and aging. Rejuvenation Res. 2005;8(1):3–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhang Y, Xu X, Hu M, et al. SPATA33 is an autophagy mediator for cargo selectivity in germline mitophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(3):1076–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chang S, Lee A, Yu K, et al. Dihydroergotamine Tartrate Induces Lung Cancer Cell Death through Apoptosis and Mitophagy. Chemotherapy. 2016;61(6):304–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Livingston M, Wang J, Zhou J, et al. Clearance of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy is important to the protective effect of ischemic preconditioning in kidneys. Autophagy. 2019;15(12):2142–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pagliarini V, Wirawan E, Romagnoli A, et al. Proteolysis of Ambra1 during apoptosis has a role in the inhibition of the autophagic pro-survival response. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(9):1495–504.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schweers RL, Zhang J, Randall MS, et al. NIX is required for programmed mitochondrial clearance during reticulocyte maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(49):19500–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sandoval H, Thiagarajan P, Dasgupta SK, et al. Essential role for Nix in autophagic maturation of erythroid cells. Nature. 2008;454(7201):232–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lu X, Altshuler-Keylin S, Wang Q, et al. Mitophagy controls beige adipocyte maintenance through a Parkin-dependent and UCP1-independent mechanism. Sci Signal. 2018;11(527): eaap8526.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nah J, Yuan J, Jung YK. Autophagy in neurodegenerative diseases: from mechanism to therapeutic approach. Mol Cells. 2015;38(5):381–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Valente EM, Abou-Sleiman PM, Caputo V, et al. Hereditary early-onset Parkinson’s disease caused by mutations in PINK1. Science. 2004;304(5674):1158–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Manczak M, Kandimalla R, Yin X, et al. Hippocampal mutant APP and amyloid beta-induced cognitive decline, dendritic spine loss, defective autophagy, mitophagy and mitochondrial abnormalities in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(8):1332–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chen G, Ray R, Dubik D, et al. The E1B 19K/Bcl-2-binding Protein Nip3 is a Dimeric Mitochondrial Protein that Activates Apoptosis. J Exp Med. 1997;186(12):1975–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Quinsay MN, Thomas RL, Lee Y, et al. Bnip3-mediated mitochondrial autophagy is independent of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Autophagy. 2010;6(7):855–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Matsushima M, Fujiwara T, Takahashi E, et al. Isolation, mapping, and functional analysis of a novel human cDNA (BNIP3L) encoding a protein homologous to human NIP3. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1998;21:230–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhang J, Ney P. NIX induces mitochondrial autophagy in reticulocytes. Autophagy. 2008;4(3):354–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hanna RA, Quinsay MN, Orogo AM, et al. Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) interacts with Bnip3 protein to selectively remove endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria via autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(23):19094–104.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jung J, Zhang Y, Celiku O, et al. Mitochondrial NIX Promotes Tumor Survival in the Hypoxic Niche of Glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2019;79(20):5218–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Marinković M, Šprung M, Novak I. Dimerization of mitophagy receptor BNIP3L/NIX is essential for recruitment of autophagic machinery. Autophagy. 2021;17(5):1232–43.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhu Y, Massen S, Terenzio M. Modulation of Serines 17 and 24 in the LC3-interacting Region of Bnip3 Determines Pro-survival Mitophagy versus Apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(2):1099–113.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chen M, Sandoval H, Wang J. Selective mitochondrial autophagy during erythroid maturation. Autophagy. 2008;4(7):926–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schwarten M, Mohrlüder J, Ma P, et al. Nix directly binds to GABARAP: a possible crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy. Autophagy. 2009;5(5):690–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Novak I, Kirkin V, McEwan D, et al. Nix is a selective autophagy receptor for mitochondrial clearance. EMBO Rep. 2010;11(1):45–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bellot G, Garcia-Medina R, Gounon P, et al. Hypoxia-induced autophagy is mediated through hypoxia-inducible factor induction of BNIP3 and BNIP3L via their BH3 domains. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(10):2570–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Aucello M, Dobrowolny G, Musarò A. Localized accumulation of oxidative stress causes muscle atrophy through activation of an autophagic pathway. Autophagy. 2009;5(4):527–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sowter HM, Ratcliffe PJ, Watson P, et al. HIF-1-dependent regulation of hypoxic induction of the cell death factors BNIP3 and NIX in human tumors. Cancer Res. 2001;61(18):6669–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gee EC, Hyun JL, Chang WC, et al. BNIP3L/NIX-mediated mitophagy protects against glucocorticoid-induced synapse defects. Nat Commun. 2021;12:487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Liu L, Feng D, Chen G, et al. Mitochondrial outer-membrane protein FUNDC1 mediates hypoxia-induced mitophagy in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:177–85.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chen Z, Liu L, Cheng Q, et al. Mitochondrial E3 ligase MARCH5 regulates FUNDC1 to fine-tune hypoxic mitophagy. EMBO Rep. 2017;18(3):495–509.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wu W, Tian W, Hu Z, et al. ULK1 translocates to mitochondria and phosphorylates FUNDC1 to regulate mitophagy. EMBO Rep. 2014;15(5):566–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen G, Han Z, Feng D, et al. A regulatory signaling loop comprising the PGAM5 phosphatase and CK2 controls receptor-mediated mitophagy. Mol Cell. 2014;54(3):362–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Liu L, Li YJ, Wang JN, et al. Mitophagy receptor FUNDC1 is regulated by PGC-1α/NRF1 to fine tune mitochondrial homeostasis. EMBO Rep. 2021;22(3):e50629.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Di Rita A, Peschiaroli A, Acunzo P, et al. HUWE1 E3 ligase promotes PINK1/PARKIN-independent mitophagy by regulating AMBRA1 activation via IKKα. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3755.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Van HC, Cornelissen T, Hofkens H, et al. Parkin interacts with Ambra1 to induce mitophagy. J Neurosci. 2011;31:10249–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chu CT, Ji J, Dagda RK, et al. Cardiolipin externalization to the outer mitochondrial membrane acts as an elimination signal for mitophagy in neuronal cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15(10):1197–205.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sentelle RD, Senkal CE, Jiang W, et al. Ceramide targets autophagosomes to mitochondria and induces lethal mitophagy. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8(10):831–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bhujabal Z, Birgisdottir AB, Sjøttem E, et al. FKBP8 recruits LC3A to mediate Parkin-independent mitophagy. EMBO Rep. 2017;18(6):947–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Shu L, Hu C, Xu M, et al. ATAD3B is a mitophagy receptor mediating clearance of oxidative stress-induced damaged mitochondrial DNA. EMBO J. 2021;40(8):e106283.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kanki T, Klionsky D, Okamoto K. Mitochondria autophagy in yeast. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(10):1989–2001.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kondo-Okamoto N, Noda NN, Suzuki SW, et al. Autophagy-related protein 32 acts as autophagic degron and directly initiates mitophagy. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(13):10631–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Aoki Y, Kanki T, Hirota Y, et al. Phosphorylation of Serine 114 on Atg32 mediates mitophagy. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(17):3206–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Okamoto K, Kondo-Okamoto N, Ohsumi Y. Mitochondria-anchored receptor Atg32 mediates degradation of mitochondria via selective autophagy. Dev Cell. 2009;17(1):87–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ichimura Y, Kumanomidou T, Sou Y, et al. Structural basis for sorting mechanism of p62 in selective autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(33):22847–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kanki T, Furukawa K, Yamashita S. Mitophagy in yeast: Molecular mechanisms and physiological role. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853:2756–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Geisler S, Holmström KM, Skujat D, et al. PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is dependent on VDAC1 and p62/SQSTM1. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(2):119–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kitada T, Asakawa S, Hattori N, et al. Mutations in the parkin gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism. Nature. 1998;392(6676):605–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Jin SM, Lazarou M, Wang C, et al. Mitochondrial membrane potential regulates PINK1 import and proteolytic destabilization by PARL. J Cell Biol. 2010;191(5):933–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Meissner C, Lorenz H, Weihofen A, et al. The mitochondrial intramembrane protease PARL cleaves human Pink1 to regulate Pink1 trafficking. J Neurochem. 2011;117(5):856–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Yamano K, Youle R. PINK1 is degraded through the N-end rule pathway. Autophagy. 2013;9(11):1758–69.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kim Y, Park J, Kim S, et al. PINK1 controls mitochondrial localization of Parkin through direct phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;377(3):975–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kondapalli C, Kazlauskaite A, Zhang N, et al. PINK1 is activated by mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization and stimulates Parkin E3 ligase activity by phosphorylating Serine 65. Open Biol. 2012;2(5):120080.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kazlauskaite A, Kondapalli C, Gourlay R, et al. Parkin is activated by PINK1-dependent phosphorylation of ubiquitin at Ser65. Biochem J. 2014;460(1):127–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ordureau A, Sarraf S, Duda D, et al. Quantitative proteomics reveal a feedforward mechanism for mitochondrial PARKIN translocation and ubiquitin chain synthesis. Mol Cell. 2014;56(3):360–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Koyano F, Okatsu K, Kosako H, et al. Ubiquitin is phosphorylated by PINK1 to activate parkin. Nature. 2014;510(7503):162–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Villa E, Proïcs E, Rubio-Patiño C, et al. Parkin-independent mitophagy controls chemotherapeutic response in cancer cells. Cell Rep. 2017;20(12):2846–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Szargel R, Shani V, Abd Elghani F, et al. The PINK1, synphilin-1 and SIAH-1 complex constitutes a novel mitophagy pathway. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(16):3476–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ding W, Ni H, Li M, et al. Nix is critical to two distinct phases of mitophagy, reactive oxygen species-mediated autophagy induction and Parkin-ubiquitin-p62-mediated mitochondrial priming. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(36):27879–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lee Y, Lee H, Hanna R, et al. Mitochondrial autophagy by Bnip3 involves Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission and recruitment of Parkin in cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301(5):1924–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zhang T, Xue L, Li L, et al. BNIP3 protein suppresses pink1 kinase proteolytic cleavage to promote mitophagy. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(41):21616–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Fei P, Wang W, Kim S, et al. Bnip3L is induced by p53 under hypoxia, and its knockdown promotes tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2004;6(6):597–609.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Kulikov A, Luchkina E, Gogvadze V, et al. Mitophagy: Link to cancer development and therapy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;482(3):432–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Waris G, Ahsan H. Reactive oxygen species: role in the development of cancer and various chronic conditions. J Carcinog. 2006;5:14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Yan C, Luo L, Guo C, et al. Doxorubicin-induced mitophagy contributes to drug resistance in cancer stem cells from HCT8 human colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2017;388:34–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Im E, Yoo L, Hyun M, et al. Covalent ISG15 conjugation positively regulates the ubiquitin E3 ligase activity of parkin. Open Biol. 2016;6(8):160193.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Chi H, Chen S, Lin S, et al. Thyroid hormone protects hepatocytes from HBx-induced carcinogenesis by enhancing mitochondrial turnover. Oncogene. 2017;36(37):5274–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Poulogiannis G, McIntyre R, Dimitriadi M, et al. PARK2 deletions occur frequently in sporadic colorectal cancer and accelerate adenoma development in Apc mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(34):15145–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    He J, Pei L, Jiang H, et al. Chemoresistance of colorectal cancer to 5-fluorouracil is associated with silencing of the BNIP3 gene through aberrant methylation. J Cancer. 2017;8(7):1187–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Beroukhim R, Mermel C, Porter D, et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature. 2010;463(7283):899–905.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Cesari R, Martin E, Calin G, et al. Parkin, a gene implicated in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 6q25-q27. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(10):5956–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Li W, Li Y, Siraj S, et al. FUN14 domain-containing 1-mediated mitophagy suppresses hepatocarcinogenesis by inhibition of inflammasome activation in mice. Hepatology. 2019;69(2):604–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Liu K, Lee J, Kim J, et al. Mitophagy controls the activities of tumor suppressor p53 to regulate hepatic cancer stem cells. Mol Cell. 2017;68(2):281–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Carew J, Zhou Y, Albitar M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in primary leukemia cells after chemotherapy: clinical significance and therapeutic implications. Leukemia. 2003;17(8):1437–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Li N, Ragheb K, Lawler G, et al. Mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone induces apoptosis through enhancing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(10):8516–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lu J, Chew E, Holmgren A. Targeting thioredoxin reductase is a basis for cancer therapy by arsenic trioxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(30):12288–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Yao N, Wang C, Hu N, et al. Inhibition of PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy sensitizes multidrug-resistant cancer cells to B5G1, a new betulinic acid analog. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(3):232.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Liu Y, Fu Y, Hu X, et al. Caveolin-1 knockdown increases the therapeutic sensitivity of lung cancer to cisplatin-induced apoptosis by repressing Parkin-related mitophagy and activating the ROCK1 pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(2):1197–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Li Z, Wang Y, Wu L, et al. Apurinic endonuclease 1 promotes the cisplatin resistance of lung cancer cells by inducing Parkin-mediated mitophagy. Oncol Rep. 2019;42(6):2245–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    MacKeigan J, Murphy L, Blenis J. Sensitized RNAi screen of human kinases and phosphatases identifies new regulators of apoptosis and chemoresistance. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7(6):591–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Chen L, Liu L, Li Y, et al. Melatonin increases human cervical cancer HeLa cells apoptosis induced by cisplatin via inhibition of JNK/Parkin/mitophagy axis. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2018;54(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ma M, Lin X, Liu H, et al. Suppression of DRP1-mediated mitophagy increases the apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in the setting of chemotherapy. Oncol Rep. 2020;43(3):1010–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Zhou J, Li G, Zheng Y, et al. A novel autophagy/mitophagy inhibitor liensinine sensitizes breast cancer cells to chemotherapy through DNM1L-mediated mitochondrial fission. Autophagy. 2015;11(8):1259–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Chen Y, Chen H-N, Wang K, et al. Ketoconazole exacerbates mitophagy to induce apoptosis by downregulating cyclooxygenase-2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019;70(1):66–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Zhang C, Liu Z, Bunker E, et al. Sorafenib targets the mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes and ATP synthase to activate the PINK1-Parkin pathway and modulate cellular drug response. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(36):15105–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Boyle K, Van Wickle J, Hill R, et al. Mitochondria-targeted drugs stimulate mitophagy and abrogate colon cancer cell proliferation. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(38):14891–904.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Liao XD, Deng HY and Liao CH for their assistance in construction and guidance. The authors wish to thank Zhu Q for his assistance in manuscript correction.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 82073111, 81874197) and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant Number 21S11901600) to L.H.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LH, supervised the whole work and revised the manuscript, YG, YW, BL and KS made literature search and draft the manuscript of this review, QL and YN edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yingyin Ni or Lei Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree with the final version of the manuscript and give their consent for its publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guan, Y., Wang, Y., Li, B. et al. Mitophagy in carcinogenesis, drug resistance and anticancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell Int 21, 350 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-02065-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mitophagy
  • Mechanism
  • Carcinogenesis
  • Drug resistance
  • Anticancer therapeutics