Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Primary research
  • Open access
  • Published:

CircCASC15-miR-100-mTOR may influence the cervical cancer radioresistance

Cancer Cell International volume 22, Article number: 165 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer has ranked the top one in gynecological malignancies for incidence. Radioresistance is now becoming a leading reason of recurrence.

Methods

Our microRNA array data indicated that the miRNA-100 level decreased significantly during radioresistance. In this study, we up-regulated miR-100 in Hela and Siha cells by using miR-100 mimics and observed proliferation and invasion.

Results

It turned out that with overexpression of miR-100, the cells had less invasiveness as well as proliferation. It may target gene mTOR, and it deed reduced EMT. To examine the role of miR-100 in radioresistance, there was no significant result showed by BSP. While the circCASC15 has been identified with sponge function according to RNA pull down and ISH.

Conclusion

The conclusions indicate miR-100 is a tumor suppressor gene and could be a therapeutic target in radio-resistant cervical cancers.

Introduction

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women, whose morbidity and mortality has ranked the fourth of female malignant tumors. In 2018, approximately 570,000 cases of cervical cancer have been diagnosed and 311,000 died of it [1]. Early stage can be managed surgically with cervical cone biopsy, simple or radical hysterectomy, with pelvic lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy. For late stage, the recommended therapeutic options also include chemotherapy, external beam radiation, and brachytherapy. So radiotherapy (RT) has been widely applied from stage I to stage IV cervical cancer as primary or postoperative adjuvant treatment, and maybe the only treatment available for many patients with advanced cervical cancer. However, recurrence after radiotherapy remains significant. Approximately 20% of patients diagnosed with pelvic recurrence, while the cure rate for early-stage is more than 80% [2]. The 5-year survival rate of recurrence is between 10.1% and 22.3% [3, 4]. Therefore, elimination of radioresistance was important for patients diagnosed with cervical cancer.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) belong to non-coding RNA family that function at the post-transcriptional level. Their deregulated expression can influence both treatment response [5] and development of drug resistance [6, 7].MiR-100 belongs to miR-99 family, which located in chromosome 11. It has been proved playing a role in proliferation, metastasis, as well as sensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [8,9,10,11].

In human cancers, DNA hypermethylation of CPG islands in gene promoters has been reported as one mechanism for down-regulating tumor suppressor genes. Aberrant CpG methylation in miRNA promoter regions may contribute to their dysregulation in some cancers [12]. An estimated 10% of miRNAs are regulated epigenetically through DNA methylation. To further investigate whether the downregulation of MiR-100 originates from the hypermethylation of the genomic region upstream of MiR-100, Bisulfite Sequencing Polymerase Chain Reaction (BSP) was used.

Circular RNA (circRNA) is another kind of non-coding RNA because it is a closed covalent loop without poly A tail or 5'to 3' polarity [13]. At present, more than 30,000 circRNAs have been identified [14]. A variety of circRNAs are believed to have relationship with occurrence of tumors [15]. Several reports have showed that miRNA response elements exist in circRNAs, which act as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) to sponge miRNAs or transcriptional regulators.

In this study, we up-regulated miR-100 and found more apoptosis and less invasiveness as well as proliferation. It may also influence cell cycle via target gene mTOR, and it deed reduced EMT. In order to detect the mechanism of miR-100 in radioresistance, BSP showed no significance. While the circCASC15 has been identified with sponge function according to RNA pull down and ISH. We found miR-100 downregulated in radioresistant cervical cancer and found circCASC15 may be the sponge of miR-100.

Materials and methods

Patient selection and human tissues

Group 1 (for miRNA real time polymerase chain reaction array)

Three patients have been clarified as stage IIB-IVA according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), who had received radiotherapy in our hospital between 2000 and 2008. According to the 2013 NCCN cervical cancer clinical practice guidelines, patients received standard radiotherapy, pelvic radiotherapy and branch radiotherapy, with a total dose of 70 Gy at point A [16]. Two pathologists evaluated histology independently. According to the hospital's internal review and ethics committee, all samples were collected with informed consent.

Group 2 for QPCR

84 cervical tumors were obtained from our department, between January 2002 and June 2011. None of them received any treatment before surgery. All patients have been confirmed HPV infection. Three patients without lesion on cervix were chosen as normal controls.

MiRNAs real time polymerase chain reaction array

After isolation total RNA, Universal cDNA synthesis kit (Exiqon) was used. MiRNAs were detected by the miRCURY LNA™ Universal real time microRNA polymerase chain reaction system (Exiqon, kangchen, China).

Cell culture

HeLa and SiHa were purchased from China Academic Sinica Cell Repository, Shanghai, China. They were in MEM medium (Gibco, Los Angeles, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum in an incubator under humidity at 37℃with 5% CO2.

Transient transfection

MiR-100-5p mimics purchased from Genepharma (Shanghai, China), were transient transfected into cells with Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen). Mock-transfected condition was made by negative control mimics with fluorescence. All the cells were collected at 48 h post-transfection, and the levels of miR-100 were elevated by RT-PCR assay as follow. The sequences of miR-100-5p mimics and negative control were shown below:

  • Mimics (forward 5′-AACCCGUAGAUCCGAACUUGUG-3′.

  • Reverse 5′-CAAGUUCGGAUCUACGGGUUUU-3′);

  • Negative control (forward 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′.

  • Reverse 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′);

miRNA expression analysis and RT-PCR assay

The RNAs were collected from cells by Trizol extraction (Invitrogen), and cDNAs were acquired using an RNA reverse transcription amplification kit (Takara). RT-PCR assays were performed by SYBR Green Real-time PCR Universal Reagent (GenePharma Co.Ltd.) and analyzed by BIO-RAD fluorescence quantitative PCR machine. Primers were as follows:

  • miR-100-5p (5′-AACCCGTAGATCCGAACTTGTG-3′);

  • u6 (5′-ACGCAAATTCGTGAAGCGTT-3′);

  • GAPDH (forward 5′-TGGAAATGACAGTGAAGCACCTC-3′.

  • reverse 5′-TCGTTCATGCACTCGCTGAAG-3′);

U6 was used as control for miRNA, GAPDH was used as control for mRNA. Both of them was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCT method.

Proliferation assay

After cultured (1 × 104 cells/well) in separate 96-well plates for 24 h, cells were transfected with miR-100-5p mimics. At day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4 after transfection, cells activation were evaluated by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, the absorbance were read at 450 nm.

Tumor xenografts

Siha cells (2 × 106) were transfected with miR-100 or Negative Control for 2 days following animal experiments institutional ethical guidelines. Cells were digested and resuspended in 200μL PBS.PBS with cells or without cells were injected into female BALB/c athymic nude mouse (4-week-old). Six nude mice were used. Mice were anesthetized with Isoflurane (Forene, Abbott GmbH & Co.KG, Wiesbaden, Germany) with 1 L*min−1 O2 flow for euthanasia.

Bioinformatics

Two public algorithms MiRanda (http://www.microrna.org) and TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/) were chosen for predicting target genes. To avoid false positive predictions, only putative target genes predicted by both programs were accepted.

Immunohistochemistry

After embedded by paraffin- and fixed with formalin, tissue was cut into 5 μm section. Deparaffinization, rehydration, quenche, and retrieve, incubation at 4 °C overnight with Anti-mTOR (phospho S2448) antibody (HRP) (ab196914) (Abcam).

Establishment of radioresistant (RR) cell lines

Cells were exposed to two Gy 3 times, four Gy 3 times, six Gy 3 times, eight Gy 2 times and ten Gy 2 times at 300 cGy/min with a linear accelerator (SIMEN, Germany). [17, 18].

5-aza-2-Deoxycytidine treatment

HeLa and SiHa cells(3 × 105cells/well) were cultured in 6-well plates overnight, then 10 μM DAC(5-aza-2-deoxycytidine) or 10 μM DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) was separately added to cells per 24 h. Cells were harvested after 5 days, and RNAs were extracted for detecting the level of mir-100 as mentioned above.

Bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP)

Following extraction (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit), Genomic DNA was subjected to EpiTect® Plus DNA Bisulfite Kit. After purification, modified DNA was chosen as nested PCR reactions template. The second-round PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on agarose gels, excised, and inserted into the TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen, K4600-01). Clones were used for DNA sequencing randomly.

Outer primers, 5′-ATTCGAATTTAGTGGAATTAGAATC-3′ (forward) and 5′-AACCTACAACAACAACAACAACG-3′(reverse);

Nested primers, 5′-TTAGTAATTTTAGGTTAGAGGGTTATCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-ACTCCAAAAACCCATAACTAACCG-3′ (reverse).

Western blotting

Protein was extracted from cells with ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation lysis solution, then centrifugated to remove cell debris. N-cadherin (ab18203) and E-cadherin (ab194982) from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) were chosen as primary antibodies and HRP‐conjugated secondary antibody was purchased from Sangon (Shanghai, China).GAPDH and β-actin were employed as loading controls.

CircRNA expression profiles in CC

We enriched the contained circRNAs and digested them with RNase A, then reversely transcribed them to RNA by fluorescent reagents and random primers. We used Human circRNA Arrays (8 × 15 K, Arraystar, Rockville, MD, USA) to determine the circRNA profile. Those circRNAs with fold change ≥ 2 were identified as differentially expression circRNAs. The data were analyzed by using R software and Arraystar program (Arraystar).

Biotin-coupled probe pull-down assay

Hela and Siha cells were transfected by biotinylated miR-100-5p mimics or its mutant (Genepharma, Suzhou, China). Then cells underwent harvest, lysis, sonicate, and incubation with magnetic beads at 4℃ overnight. The RNA mix bound to the magnetic beads was eluted and treated with Trizol for further qRT-PCR.

Florescent in situ hybridization

Fluorescent in situ hybridization probes for circCASC15, miR-100, and 18S RNA were designed and synthesized by Synbio Technologies (Suzhou, China). 18S RNA was used as a positive control. The signals of the probes were examined by the Florescent in Situ Hybridization Kit (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China).

Data analysis

All data were based on three independent replicates. Statistical analyses were analyzed by SPSS 13.0. Data were presented as the mean values ± standard error. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MiR-100 is down-regulated in radioresistant human cervical cancer

To investigate miRNAs differential expressions in human radioresistant cervical cancer and to seek their roles in radioresistance, we performed miRNA microarray profiling analysis. At last we confirmed a set of miRNAs that are down-regulated in invasive cervical cancer. The most deregulated miRNA was miR-100 at 5 folds (P = 0.028) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Foid changes of down-regulated miRNAs real time polymerase chain reaction array of radioresistant cervical cancer

Full size image

MiR-100 is correlated with poor clinical outcomes in cervical cancer

The expression of miR-100 in 84 samples of cervical cancer and 3 normal cervical tissues from hysterectomy including uterine myoma or prolapse were tested by PCR. The average expression of miR-100 in cancer samples was lower than normal samples. We found that miR-100 expression was correlated with tumor size (P < 0.001), lymph node (LN) status (P < 0.001) and TNM stage (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Low level of miR-100 is correlated with poor clinical outcomes in tumor size, lymph node status, TNM stage disease-free survival

Full size image

MiR-100 inhibits invasion and reduces EMT

Since the fact that miR-100 was decreased at fivefolds in invasive cervical cancer according to the array, miR-100 mimics was used to up-regulate its expressions in Hela and Siha (Fig. 3A). Cell invasiveness was tested by transwell assay in 24-well-plate which illustrated that miR-100 could inhibit invasion at Hela and Siha cells (Fig. 3B). Wondering whether the inhibition of invasiveness was mediated via EMT, western Blot was performed. As expected, up-regulation of miR-100 reduced EMT in protein levels (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3
figure 3figure 3

A MiR-100 mimics was used to up-regulate its expressions in Hela and Siha. B Cell invasiveness was tested by transwell assay in 24-well-plate which illustrated that miR-100 could inhibit invasion in Hela and Siha cells. C Western Blot showed the expression of N-cadherine and E-cadherine. D Proliferation was measured by CCK8 of Hela. E Proliferation of Siha. F, G MiR-100 inhibited tumorigenesis of SCC xenografts

Full size image

MiR-100 inhibits proliferation in cervical cancer

The observed down-regulation of miR-100 in human invasive cervical cancer tissues prompted us to detect whether it would be a tumor suppressor. Proliferation was measured by CCK8 kit after cells were transfected miR-100 mimics for 24, 48, 72 and 96h. No significant difference of proliferation of Hela (Fig. 3D) and Siha (Fig. 3E) were observed at the point of 24h after transfection. While at the other time points, proliferations were inhibited in cells treated with mimics.

MiR-100 inhibits tumorigenesis in SCC xenografts

Three mice were injected cells transfected with miR-100, while others injected without transfection. Compared to control group, the volume of tumor was reduced (Fig. 3F and G).

MiR-100 targets mTOR

MiRanda and TargetScan predicted mTOR to be a target of miR-100.According to sequence analysis, mTOR was found contained a putative binding site of miR-100 (Fig. 4A). To verify whether mTOR was the target of miR-100, a wild-type mTOR 3'UTR fragment was cloned downstream of the firefly luciferase reporter gene. When pc3-miR-100 was co-transfected, the relative luciferase activity of the reporter gene containing the wild-type 3'UTR was inhibited significantly (Fig. 4B). And the expression of p-mTOR on cervical cancer was significantly higher than normal cervical tissue (Fig. 4C).

Fig. 4
figure 4

MTOR was a direct target of miR-100. A Putative miR-100-binding sequence in the 3′UTR of mTOR mRNA. B Luciferase activity on the presence of both wild-type mTOR 3′UTR or mutant and miR-100 was compared with those of the controls. *P < 0.05. C The expression of p-mTOR on cervical cancer was significantly higher than normal cervical

Full size image

MiR-100 was provoked by 5-Aza-CdR in HeLa and SiHa

We applied 10 μM 5-Aza-CdR to HeLa and SiHa, to evaluate the effects on miR-100. As shown in Fig. 5A the treatment significantly up-regulated the level of miR-100 in both cell lines, suggesting a possible role of methylation in the regulation of miR-100 during the process of radiotherapy (P < 0.05).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The methylation of miR-100HG in HeLa, HRR, SiHa and SRR. A 5-Aza-CdR provoked mir-100 in HeLa and SiHa. B Bisulfite sequencing PCR. Open circles: unmethylated CpG sites; solid black circles: methylated CpG sites. C The percentage of CpG methylation of the MIR-100HG in HeLa, HRR, SiHa and SRR

Full size image

The level of miR-100 regulated by radiotherapy may not be mediated by miR-100HG

Bisulfite sequencing PCR was used to elevate the methylation of miR-100HG in HeLa, HRR, SiHa and SRR (Fig. 5B). The percentage of CpG methylation was 0.207 ± 0.050, 0.148 ± 0.042, 0.067 ± 0.014, 0.045 ± 0.021, respectively Fig. 5C. As shown in Fig. 5C, the methylation of miR-100HG decreased after radiotherapy, though there was no statistical significance.

CiRcCASC15 may sponge miR-100 in ceRNA manner

Three cervical cancer tissues and three normal cervical tissues were used for circRNAs expression profiling. The scatter and volcano plots demonstrated the result (Fig. 6A). The cluster heat map showed circRNAs that expressed over two fold change. QPCR was performed to verify the microarray results. Consistent with the microarray, qPCR showed that circCASC15 was increased in Hela and Siha cells compared to normal cervical tissues (Fig. 6B).

Fig. 6
figure 6figure 6

A The cluster heat map demonstrates the differentially expressed circRNAs over twofold change. B The expression of circCASC15 in CC was upregulated. C The predicted binding sites between circCASC15 and miRNA-100. D Pull-down assay for biotin labeled miRNA was used to evaluate binding properties between miR-100-5p and circCASC15 in Hela and Siha. E CircCasc15 and miR-100 were found mainly expressed in cytoplasm. F Graphical abstract

Full size image

With bioinformatic prediction, miR-100-5p was predicted as the sponge target of has-circ-CASC15 (Fig. 6C). To find the regulatory mechanism of miR-100, RNA pulldown assay was performed. CircCASC15 was found to be combined with miR-100 (Fig. 6D). CircCasc15 and miR-100 were found mainly expressed in cytoplasm. Both in our microarray analysis and tissues validation, circCASC15 was downregulated (Fig. 6E).

Discussion

In the assay of breast cancer, the increase of miR-100 in the radio-resistant cell lines was detected [19]. While miR-100 was considered to be a suppressor gene, which used to decrease in cervical cancer. In this assay, its expression suggested a potential role in sensitivity of radiotherapy. In oral cancer, the increase of miR-100 inhibited FGFBP1 and FGFR3, which over-expressed in radio-resistant cells [8], indirectly corroborate our hypothesis.

It is recorded that DNA methylation may play an important role in silencing microRNA in tumors. A meta-analysis of 122 microRNAs showed that microRNAs regulated by methylation were mainly located in chromosome 1, 7, 11, 14 and 19 [20]. As miR-100 located in chromosome 11, we inferred that methylation may contribute to the regulation of it. Thereby we detected the effects of 5-Aza-CdR on HeLa and SiHa. With the treatment, the expressions of miR-100 were significantly induced. Our evidence linked methylation to irradiation on the increase of miR-100 in HeLa and SiHa, suggesting the level of methylation may have changed in the process of radiotherapy.

In breast cancer, miR-100 has been proved to be regulated by the methylation of miR100HG, a host gene, where the miR-100 gene embedded [21]. Furthermore, we elevated the methylation of MiR-100HG in SiHa, SRR, HeLa and HRR to validate our hypothesis. The Bisulfite sequencing PCR showed that the percentage of CpG methylation slightly decreased in HRR and SRR, compared to Hela and SiHa. Accordingly, the level of miR-100 regulated by radiotherapy may not be directly mediated by the methylation of miR100HG. As the loss of chromosome 11 also can lead to the low expression of miR-100 [22], the regulation of miR-100 remains to further research.

It’s widely shared that miRNAs could bind to 3’UTR leading mRNA cleavage or translation inhibition which negatively regulate downstream mRNA and transcription factors [23]. While as a single miRNA can regulate sorts of mRNAs and in return one individual mRNA could be controlled by several miRNAs. Nevertheless, genes regulated by one miRNA often have similar functions. The identified targets of miR-100 include mTOR [7, 23]. They both act as cell cycle activate genes which enable and allow cells entry into mitosis [24,25,26].

MTOR is a protein kinase belonging to PI3K family [27]. As the core component of many different complexes, mTOR plays a key role in a variety of biological processes [27, 28]. Up-regulating mTOR signaling can promote tumor growth and progression through a variety of mechanisms [29]. One study has revealed increased expression of mTOR in cervical cancer [30]. In all cases, SCCs showed high translocation of p-mTOR and p-p70S6K in nuclear [31]. Faried et al. found activated AKT and mTOR related with poorer prognosis. The same authors [32] also investigated the expression of phosphorylated mTOR was independent and was a significant prognostic marker in cervical adenocarcinoma. In addition, the expression of p-mTOR can be used as a marker to predict chemotherapy response and survival of CC [33]. Moreover, Kim et al. [34] have also reported that p-mTOR was associated with poor response to radiotherapy. They [32] also independently studied the expression of p-mTOR as an important prognostic marker of cervical adenocarcinoma. In addition, the expression of phosphorylated mTOR can be used to predict the chemotherapy response and survival [33]. The cytoplasmic expression of p-mTOR was also related to the adverse reactions of radiotherapy [34].

CircCASC15 was also named hsa_circ_0075828. The circCASC15, generated from CASC15 gene, was 204 nucleotides in length. Divergent primers were designed and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. MRE (miRNA response element) has been proved existing in circRNA and acts as a ceRNA sponge or transcription regulator. There has been no report about circCASC15 in cervical cancer before our study.

In conclusion, circCASC15-miR-100-mTOR might influence the EMT of cervical cancer. And this loop will be the target of radioresistance in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

circRNA:

Circular RNA

ceRNAs:

Competitive endogenous RNAs

CC:

Cervical cancer

NC:

Negative control

RR:

Radioresistant

EMT:

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

MRE:

MiRNA response element

References

  1. Buskwofie A, David-West G, Clare CA. A review of cervical cancer: incidence and disparities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020;112(2):229–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumann M, Krause M, Thames H, Trott K, Zips D. Cancer stem cells and radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;85(5):391–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergkvist GT, Argyle DJ, Pang LY, Muirhead R, Yool DA. Studies on the inhibition of feline EGFR in squamous cell carcinoma: enhancement of radiosensitivity and rescue of resistance to small molecule inhibitors. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;11(11):927–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beskow C, Skikuniene J, Holgersson A, Nilsson B, Lewensohn R, Kanter L, Viktorsson K. Radioresistant cervical cancer shows upregulation of the NHEJ proteins DNA-PKcs, Ku70 and Ku86. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(5):816–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meng F, Henson R, Lang M, Wehbe H, Maheshwari S, Mendell JT, Jiang J, Schmittgen TD, Patel T. Involvement of human micro-RNA in growth and response to chemotherapy in human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(7):2113–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xia L, Zhang D, Du R, Pan Y, Zhao L, Sun S, Hong L, Liu J, Fan D. miR-15b and miR-16 modulate multidrug resistance by targeting BCL2 in human gastric cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(2):372–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagaraja AK, Creighton CJ, Yu Z, Zhu H, Gunaratne PH, Reid JG, et al. A link between mir-100 and FRAP1/mTOR in clear cell ovarian cancer. Mol Endocrinal. 2010;24(2):447–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Henson BJ, Bhattacharjee S, O’Dee DM, Feingold E, Gollin SM. Decreased expression of miR-125b and miR-100 in oral cancer cells contributes to malignancy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009;48(7):569–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ng WL, Yan D, Zhang X, Mo YY, Wang Y. Over-expression of miR-100 is responsible for the lower—expression of ATM in the human glioma cell line: M059J. DNA Repair. 2010;9(11):1170–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu W, Gong YH, Chao TF, Peng XZ, Yuan JG, Ma ZY, Jia G, Zhao JZ. Identification of differentially expressed microRNAs by microarray: a possible role for microRNAs gene in medulloblastomas. Chin Med J. 2009;122(20):2405–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilusz JE, Sharp PA. A circuitous route to noncoding RNA. Science. 2013;340(6131):440–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen H, Xu Z. Hypermethylation-associated silencing of miR-125a and miR-125b: a potential marker in colorectal cancer. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:345080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salzman J, Chen RE, Olsen MN, Wang PL, Brown PO. Cell-type specific features of circular RNA expression. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(9):e1003777.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao ZJ, Shen J. Circular RNA participates in the carcinogenesis and the malignant behavior of cancer. RNA Biol. 2017;14(5):514–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, Kjems J. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495(7441):384–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR, Apte SM, Campos SM, Chan J, Cho KR, Cohn D, Crispens MA, DuPont N, Eifel PJ, Gaffney DK, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Han E, Huh WK, Lurain JR 3rd, Martin L, Morgan MA, Mutch D, Remmenga SW, Reynolds RK, Small W Jr, Teng N, Tillmanns T, Valea FA, McMillian NR, Hughes M. National comprehensive cancer, cervical cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(3):320–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang C, Lu H, Li J, Xie X, Fan L, Wang D, Tan W, Wang Y, Lin Z, Yao T. SOX2 regulates radioresistance in cervical cancer via the hedgehog signaling pathway. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;151(3):533–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fan L, Huang C, Li J, Gao T, Lin Z, Yao T. Long non coding RNA urothelial cancer associated 1 regulates radioresistance via the hexokinase 2/glycolytic pathway in cervical cancer. Int J Mol Med. 2018;42(4):2247–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mueller AC, Sun D, Dutta A. The miR-99 family regulates the DNA damage response through its target SNF2. Oncogene. 2013;32(9):1164–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kunej T, Godnic I, Ferdin J, Horvat S, Dovc P, Calin GA. Epigenetic regulation of microRNAs in cancer: an integrated review of literature. Mol Mech Mutagenesis. 2011;717(1–2):77–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen D, Sun Y, Yuan Y, Yuan Y, Han Z, Zhang P, Zhang J, James You M, Teruya-Feldstein J, Wang M, Gupta S, Hung MC, Liang H, Ma L. Mir-100 induces EMT but suppresses tumorgenesis, migration and invasion. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(2):e1004177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilting SM, Snijders PJ, Verlaat W, Jaspers A, van de Wiel MA, van Wieringen WN, Meijer GA, Kenter GG, Yi Y, le Sage C, Agami R, Meijer CJ, Steenbergen RD. Altered microRNA expression associated with chromosomal changes contributes to cervical carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2013;32(1):106–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen CZ. MicroRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1768–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Boutros R, Lobjoois V, Ducommun B. CDC25 phosphatases in cancer cells:key players? Good targets? Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(7):495–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Strebhardt K. Multifaceted polo-like kinases: drug targets and antitargets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(8):643–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Petrelli A, Perra A, Schernhuber K, Cargnelutti M, Salvi A, Migliore C, Ghiso E, Benetti A, Barlati S, Ledda-Columbano GM, Portolani N, De Petro G, Columbano A, Giordano S. Sequential analysis of multistage hepatocarcinogenesis reveals that miR-100 and PLK1 dysregulation is an early event maintained along tumor progression. Oncogene. 2012;31(42):4517–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Saxton RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;168(6):960–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Harwood FC, Klein Geltink RI, O'Hara BP, Cardone M, Janke L, Finkelstein D, Entin I, Paul L, Houghton PJ, Grosveld GC.TV7 is an essential component of a rapamycin-insensitive mTOR complex in cancer. Sci Adv. 2018;4(9): eaar3938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yin Y, Hua H, Li M, Liu S, Kong Q, Shao T, Wang J, Luo Y, Wang Q, Luo T, Jiang Y. mTORC2 promotes type I insulin-like growth factor receptor and insulin receptor activation through the tyrosine kinase activity of mTOR. Cell Res. 2016;26(1):46–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ji J, Zheng PS. Activation of mTOR signaling pathway contributes to survival of cervical cancer cells. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117(1):103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Feng W, Duan X, Liu J, Xiao J, Brown RE. Morphoproteomic evidence of constitutively activated and overexpressed mTOR pathway in cervical squamous carcinoma and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2009;2(3):249–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim MK, Kim TJ, Sung CO, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Bae DS. High expression of mTOR is associated with radiation resistance in cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21(3):181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. de Melo AC, Paulino E, Garces ÁH. A review of mTOR pathway inhibitors in gynecologic cancer. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:4809751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tinker AV, Ellard S, Welch S, Moens F, Allo G, Tsao MS, et al. Phase II study of temsirolimus (CCI-779) in women with recurrent, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the cervix. A trial of the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG IND 199). Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(2):269–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81572575), Guangdong province Natural Scientific Grant (2021A1515010267, 2018A030310055 and 2016A020215059), CSCO (Y-2019AZMS-0393).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynecological Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 107 Yan Jiang West Road, Guangzhou, 510120, People’s Republic of China

    Tingting Yao, Zhiliao Chen, Yongpai Peng, Guanglei Zhong, Chunxian Huang, Jing Li & Ruixin Li

  2. Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Gene Regulation and Target Therapy of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Tingting Yao

  3. Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou, China

    Yao Yao

Authors
  1. Tingting Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yao Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhiliao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongpai Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guanglei Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chunxian Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ruixin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TY originally designed the project and wrote this article; YY revised the manuscript; ZC conceptualized the research; YP prepared the tables and figures; GZ did florescent in situ hybridization; CH did transient transfection; JL did tumor xenografts; RL did 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine treatment and BSP. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tingting Yao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Use of patient tissue samples and nude mice were approved by the ethics committee of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Jing Li is a female.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, T., Yao, Y., Chen, Z. et al. CircCASC15-miR-100-mTOR may influence the cervical cancer radioresistance. Cancer Cell Int 22, 165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02573-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02573-3

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us