Skip to main content

Table 13 Effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors or other therapeutic agents in clinical settings

From: A review on the role of cyclin dependent kinases in cancers

Tumor type

Samples

Inhibitors / Therapy

Function

References

Breast cancer

22 patients

CDK4/6 inhibitors

After 18 months CDK4/6 treatment, best objective response was complete response in 1, partial response in 8, and stable disease in 13 patients

[336]

9771 patients

CDK4/6 inhibitors, PI3K inhibitor, and endocrine therapy

PFS was better in CDK4/6 inhibitors than PI3K inhibitors

Combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy could increase OS than PI3K/mTOR inhibitors

[337]

3421 breast cancer patients

endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors

In comparison with endocrine therapy alone, adding CDK4/6 inhibitors enhanced OS in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

But, adding of CDK4/6 inhibitors also increased the incidences of grade 3–4 adverse events

[338]

Breast cancer

2968 patients

CDK4/6 inhibitors

Treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors was found to be worse in patients with gBRCAm mBC than those with gBRCAwt and unknown gBRCA status

[339]

71 patients

CDK4/6 inhibitors

A higher median value of Ki67 was observed in cases with second-line treatment, while the luminal B subtype was more prevalent. Luminal A subtype was correlated with a longer PFS. A higher continuous Ki67 value was correlated with shorter PFS. Luminal B subtype had a significantly worse outcome. PFS in patients with endocrine therapy in combination with CDK4/6i was inversely correlated with Ki67 expression but not with PR

[340]

43 patients, (17 prior CDK4/6i exposure)

CDK4/6 inhibitors, combination of EVE and EXE

No significant difference was found in PFS or OS between patients who had not received prior CDK4/6is and those who had

[341]

3182 patients

CDK4/6 inhibitors

CDK4/6 inhibitors could increase PFS in patients with HR-positive/ HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

[342]

ongoing phase II trial (NCT02308020) (pre-treated patients with CNS metastases) (including total 52 patients with HR + /HER2- CNS metastases are currently available)

CDK4/6 inhibitor (abemaciclib)

There was scarcity of data pertaining to the development of new CNS metastases

[343]

Breast cancer

130 HR + BC patients and 83 endocrine‐resistant breast cancer patients

CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy

Patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy in the HMGB1‐positive group showed improved PFS in comparison with those in the HMGB1‐negative group

[215]

30 patients

CDK4/6 inhibitors plus hormonal therapy

Patients had a PIK3CA mutation at the baseline of CDK4/6i treatment had a shorter PFS, in comparison with patients without mutation

PIK3CA mutations were found to be

predict response to CDK4/6i

[344]

2799 patients

CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib)

Three inhibitors showed comparable efficacy, but they had differences in safety and tolerability. Abemaciclib showed worse tolerability with higher treatment discontinuation because of GI toxicity

[345]

160 patients (185 treatment occurrences)

PI3K/mTOR/CDK4/6 inhibitors

Inhibition of PI3K/mTOR/CDK4/6 could have an effect on the development of edema, so could cause or exacerbate progression of BCRL in patients with MBC

[346]

  1. gBRCAm mutated gBRCA, mBC metastatic breast cancer, gBRCAwt wild type gBRCA, EVE everolimus and EXE exemestane, PFS progression‐free survival, BCRL breast cancer-related lymphedema, MBC metastatic breast cancer