- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Synergistic effects of Smac mimetic APG-1387 with anti-PD-1 antibody are attributed to increased CD3 + NK1.1 + cell recruitment secondary to induction of cytokines from tumor cells
Cancer Cell International volume 24, Article number: 181 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved for the treatment of various tumors, but the response rate is not satisfactory in certain malignancies. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) ubiquitin-E3 ligase activity is involved in the regulation of immune responses. APG-1387 is a novel second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac) mimetic IAP inhibitor. The aim of this study was to explore the synergistic effect of APG-1387 when combined with anti-PD-1 antibody in a preclinical setting.
Methods
We utilized syngeneic mouse models of ovarian cancer (ID8), colon cancer (MC38), malignant melanoma (B16), and liver cancer (Hepa1-6) to assess the combination effect of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody, including immune-related factors, tumor growth, and survival. MSD V-PLEX validated assays were used to measure in vitro and in vivo cytokine release.
Results
In ID8 ovarian cancer and MC38 colon cancer models, APG-1387 and anti-PD1 antibody had synergistic antitumor effects. In the MC38 model, the combination of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody significantly inhibited tumor growth (P < 0.0001) and increased the survival rate of tumor-bearing animals (P < 0.001). Moreover, we found that APG-1387 upregulated tumor-infiltrating CD3 + NK1.1 + cells by nearly 2-fold, by promoting tumor cell secretion of IL-12. Blocking IL-12 secretion abrogated the synergistic effects of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody in both MC38 and ID8 models.
Conclusions
APG-1387 has the potential to turn “cold tumors” into hot ones by recruiting more CD3 + NK1.1 + cells into certain tumors. Based on these and other data, the safety and therapeutic effect of this combination will be investigated in a phase 1/2 trial in patients with advanced solid tumors or hematologic malignancies (NCT03386526).
Graphic abstract
Introduction
Direct stimulation of the immune system with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as antibodies against programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), has been reported in the management of multiple cancers [1,2,3]. Although these immunotherapies have transformed the treatment landscape for a range of solid tumors and other malignancies, certain cancers do not respond, such as microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and ovarian cancer [4]. There is hence an unmet medical need to identify strategies that may increase treatment responses. In the past 5 years, thousands of clinical strategies have failed to demonstrate synergistic effects of combination regimens including anti-PD-1 antibodies, despite frequently strong mechanistic rationales [5].
Inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) are a class of proteins that negatively regulate caspases and apoptosis [6]. IAPs are frequently dysregulated in many cancers and are believed to underlie their resistance to chemotherapeutics [7,8,9]. In addition, these proteins are reported to play an important role in immune regulation [10], including ubiquitin (Ub)-dependent pathways that modulate innate immune signaling via activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) [11].
Based on their significant biological functions in cell death and immune responses, several IAP inhibitors have been developed, and their clinical synergistic effects with anti-PD1 therapies have been tested, although results were seldom reported [12,13,14,15]. Among the studies, a prolonged partial response (PR) in patients with MSS CRC has been observed at the lowest dose cohort during dose escalation of IAP inhibitor birinapant combined with a fixed dose of pembrolizumab. However, high-dose birinapant failed to meet its efficacy endpoints at the recommended phase 2 dose (R2PD), resulting in the termination of the phase 2 trial [12].
APG-1387 is a potent bivalent second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (SMAC mimetic), a small molecule IAP inhibitor that was developed by Ascentage Pharma as a therapy for patients with cancer [16]. A phase 1 clinical trial in patients with solid tumors in China and the US shows minimal efficacy but a good safety profile ranging from 0.3 to 60 mg [17, 18].
Antiproliferative and antitumor activities of APG-1387 have been well documented in studies of a panel of cancer cell lines and xenograft tumor models [19,20,21]. Our previous study demonstrated that APG-1387 exhibited dual antitumor effects on PLC/PRF/5 hepatoma cells, not only directly inducing tumor cell apoptosis through the caspase pathway but also enhancing innate antitumor immunity by upregulating CD45 + NK1.1 cells [16]. APG-1387 also positively regulated T cells by reducing Treg-cell differentiation and downregulating PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells.
Based on these findings suggesting that APG-1387 regulates multiple aspects of antitumor immunity, it is a promising candidate to potentiate the effects of a ICIs such as an anti-PD-1 antibody when the two agents are combined. Therefore, we explored the potential synergistic antitumor effect of APG-1387 combined with an anti-PD-1 antibody in several preclinical animal tumor settings. The aims of this study were to determine whether: (1) the combination of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody resulted in synergistic antitumor effects; and (2) if present, and the effects were dose-independent and model-dependent, what the main mechanisms of action.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
APG-1387 was provided by Ascentage Pharma Group Inc (Taizhou, China). For in-vitro assays, the compound was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a stock concentration of 40 mM and stored at -20℃. The final concentration of DMSO to dilute compound in culture media did not exceed 0.1%. For an in-vivo study, APG-1387 was formulated in 5% Cremophor EL (GBCBIO, Guangzhou, China), 10% polyethyleneglycol-400 (PEG-400; GBCBIO), 85% normal saline (GBCBIO). Anti-PD-1 antibody (BE0273, Bio X Cell, Lebanon, NH, USA) and IgG antibody (BE0089, Bio X Cell) were purchased from Univ-Bio Group Inc (Shanghai, China).
Cell cultures
Mouse syngeneic tumor cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA USA) provided by Cobioer, including murine colon cancer cell line MC38 and CT26, murine liver cancer cell line Hepa1-6, and murine melanoma cell line B16. Murine ovarian cancer cell line ID8 with luciferase tag was a gift from Professor Xie Dan’s laboratory. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), MC38 cells and mouse splenocytes, were cultured in 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Hepa1-6, ID8-luciferase, and B16 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS. All culture media contained 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and all cell culture reagents were purchased from Gibco™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). All cells were maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2.and all experiments were performed in the logarithmic growth phase of the cells.
Immune cells were extracted from mouse spleens, draining lymph nodes, and tumors. After mouse spleens and draining lymph nodes were ground in 1% FBS in Phosphate buffer saline (PBS), cells were centrifuged at 1,400 rpm for 5 min (min). The red blood cell lysate was added for 10 min, then cells were washed twice with PBS and filtered by a 70-µm cell sieve for staining.
Subcutaneous mouse tumors were placed into 5 ml PBS containing 2% FBS and cut into small pieces, and then washed with PBS. Tumors were resuspended in 15 mL RPMI supplemented with 2% FBS, 50 U/mL collagenase type IV (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA), and 20 U/mL DNase (Roche Diagnostics; Swiss); samples were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Suspensions were washed three times with PBS and passed through a 70-µm strainer. PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll gradient centrifugation and collected for staining. For the ID8 model, artificial ascites was established for mechanism studies. First, 1 mL of PBS was injected into the ID8-bearing mouse’s abdomen, most was aspirated after irritation, the supernatant was collected for a cytokine study, and the cell precipitation collected for flow analysis. Another 3 mL PBS was then injected into the abdomen and all aspirated for cell collection. Finally, the cells were collected from the abdominal irritation and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Antibodies used in flow cytometry analysis
Detailed information on the antibodies used in flow cytometry analysis is listed in supplementary material Table S1. All of antibodies were used at a 1:200 dilution.
Intracellular cytokine staining
For intracellular detection of cytokines on lymphocytes, cells were first stained for extracellular markers, then suspended the cells in Fixation/Permeabilization reagent (eBioscience) for 18 h at 4 °C. Cells were then stained with an antibody against IFN-γ, washed in Permeabilization/Wash buffer (eBiosciences), and analyzed.
Sample acquisition
Data were acquired on a Cytoflex (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) and analyzed with FlowJo™ v107 (BD Biosciences, Ashland, OR, USA).
Cell apoptosis detection
Apoptotic cells were identified using an Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (Neobioscience, China) and analyzed by flow cytometry. MC38 cells were treated with the indicated concentration of APG-1387 for 48 h, followed by harvesting, washing with cold PBS, and resuspension in 200 µL of 1× binding buffer. Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) staining buffer were added and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 15 min. The samples were then diluted to a final volume of 400 µL/assay with ice-cold 1× binding buffer before analysis by FACS.
Human PBMC collection
For PBMC extraction from whole blood cell, lymphocytes were isolated by density-gradient centrifugation. In brief, the blood sample was (1) diluted once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; sterilized, cell culture grade, Gibco) in a 1:1 ratio; (2) laid on the top of the same volume of Ficoll (p9011, Solarbio, Beijing, China) in a Falcon tube; and (3) centrifuged at room temperature at 400 g (relative centrifugal field [RCF], without brake) for 30 min. The interface (lymphocytes) was carefully removed to a new tube, washed with 10 mL of 1 × PBS, centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min; and resuspended with 1 to 5 mL of 1 × PBS to determine the viability and cell number of PBMCs.
In vivo treatment of mouse syngeneic tumor models
All experiments were performed with Animal Ethics approval and conformed to regulatory standards set forth by the Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU) Animal Ethics Committee. All mouse strains were maintained in the specific-pathogen-free Laboratory Animal Center of SYSU. Female C57/B6 mice were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory (Beijing, China) and treated at between 7 and 12 weeks of age. MC38 cells (5 × 105), B16 cells (2 × 105), and Hepa1-6 cells (1 × 106) were resuspended in 100 µL of cold PBS and then subcutaneously injected into the dorsal flank of C57/B6 mice to establish colon cancer, melanoma, and liver cancer models, respectively. For the syngeneic ovarian cancer model, ID8-luciferase cells (6 × 106) were intraperitoneally (IP) injected into mice. For drug efficacy studies in subcutaneous cancer models, mice were randomized into four groups of seven mice each with approximately equivalent tumor volumes when mean values reached approximately 50 to 100 mm3. APG-1387 0.2 mg/kg or vehicle was administered intravenously (IV) once every 3 days, while 100 µg/mouse anti-PD-1 antibody (BE0273, Bio X Cell, Lebanon, NH, USA) or vehicle and IgG antibody (BE0089, Bio X Cell) was administered by IP injection, also once every 3 days, two times in total. For interleukin-12 (IL-12) in-vivo blockade, 500 µg/mouse anti-IL12p40 antibody (BE0051, Bio X Cell) was introduced by IP injection two times (once every 3 days).
For MC38, B16 and Hepa1-6 models, the diameter and width of the tumors were measured twice per week and tumor volumes were calculated as V (mm3) = 1/2 × (length × width2). Mice were euthanized when tumor volumes reached 2,000 mm3. For the ID8 tumor model, bioluminescence was adopted to estimate tumor growth using an IVIS® Spectrum in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA USA) and, on the tenth day after inoculation, mice with approximately the same photon flux were selected to treat. Tumor growth was monitored via IVIS every week until the presence of ascites. Mice were euthanized at the presence of ascites and severe hair loss.
RNA sequencing
RNA sequencing was performed by Annoroad Gene Technology (Beijing, China) after PBMC RNA extraction using an RNAprep pure Cell/Bacteria Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). A genetic library was established under standard protocol and sequenced using the Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) platform according to a PE150 sequencing strategy. The sequence of each sample was compared with the reference genome, using. HISAT2 (hierarchical indexing for spliced alignment of transcripts) is the engine to conduct alignment analysis. (HISAT2 is a rapid and sensitive alignment program to map next-generation sequencing “reads,” including either RNA or DNA, to a single reference, or population of, human genomes.)
FPKM (fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped fragments) represents a very effective tool for quantitatively estimating gene expression values using RNA-Seq technology. Gene differential expression analysis was performed using DEGseq, the treatment and reference groups were compared, the genes of |log2ratio| ≥ 1 and q < 0.05 were selected as significant differentially expressed genes, and the number of upregulated genes was obtained.
In the absence of biological replicates, DEGseq [22] was used for gene differential expression analysis. The treatment and reference groups were compared, and the genes of |log2ratio|≥1 and q < 0.05 were selected as significantly differentially expressed genes in order to obtain the number of genes up and down. DEGseq is based on the assumption that the count value is binomially distributed. An application of Bland-Altman plots to visually represent genomic information, MA plots visualize differences between measurements taken in two samples by transforming them onto log ratio (M) and mean average (A (mean average) scales, and then plotting these values. Based on MA plot theory, the approximate normal distribution of the M values is estimated, and the probability (P) value of each gene in the two samples without expression difference is calculated, with correction by the Benjamini or Storey method to obtain the q value (false discovery rate). NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information), Uniprot, GO (Gene Ontology), and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) databases were used to annotate differentially expressed genes and obtain their detailed description information.
Meso scale discovery (MSD) multicytokine assay
Ten cytokines were detected using the V-PLEX kit (K15048D, MSD) and MSD QuickPlex SQ120 (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD, USA) according to kit instructions. Because MSD is based on electrochemiluminescence technology, the signal molecule SULFO-TAG can generate signals only under the condition of electric excitation. Therefore, the entire experimental apparatus does not need to be protected from light and is not affected by differences in the technical levels of the experimental operators.
Analysis of the expression correlation between IAP2 (cIAP2) and PD-L1
The Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA 2.0, http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/#index) web server represents a high-quality resource for gene expression analysis utilizing tumor and normal samples sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases. The correlation between IAP2 (BIRC3) and PD-L1 (CD274) gene expression in ovarian cancer was carried out using TCGA data through GEPIA 2.0 online analysis.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software v6.0 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). Unless otherwise indicated, results indicate mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Differences between the two groups were analyzed using unpaired sample t-tests. Differences between more than two groups were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and two-way ANOVA. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves, and a log-rank test was used to compare survival differences between groups. A two-tailed α = 0.05 was considered statistically significant, with the following annotations of significance: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Results
The combination of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody inhibits tumor growth in ID8 ovarian cancer model
Our previous studies [19] demonstrated that APG-1387 promoted apoptosis and autophagy in ovarian cancer cells. Using the GEPIA 2.0 online analysis website, we found a positive correlation between IAP2 (cIAP2) and PD-L1 expression in ovarian cancer within the TCGA database (Fig. 1A). Therefore, we speculated that targeting cIAP2 might downregulate PD-L1 and overcome tumors to evade immune surveillance. To determine the in-vivo dose of APG-1387, we explored doses of 0.05, 0.2, and 0.8 mg/kg of APG-1387 in a wild-type C57 model and found that expression of MHC-II in splenocytes was enhanced in a dose-dependent manner, with a significant difference emerging at the 0.2-mg/kg dose (Fig. 1B-C). Therefore, 0.2 mg/kg of APG-1387 was selected for further experiments.
Next, we intraperitoneally injected ID8-luciferase cells into C57/B6 mice with intact immune systems to establish an ovarian cancer model and then to evaluate the anti-tumor effects of APG-1387 in combination with anti-PD1 antibody. And then the mice were randomly divided into four groups to receive vehicle and IgG control, APG-1387 monotherapy, anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy, and a combination of two drugs. As shown in Fig. 1D-E, the growth of the tumor was monitored using bright field and IVIS Lumina imaging, revealing that the combination therapy significantly delayed the tumor growth compared to individual treatment alone. The combination treatment significantly prolonged survival compared to the single agent group (Fig. 1F).
APG-1387-induced release of IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-12p70, and TNF-α from tumor cells is necessary for the synergistic effect between APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody
To explore the mechanism of the synergistic effect between APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody, we treated ID8 cells with 0.15 µM APG-1387 for 48 h and detected the levels of 10 common cytokines (IL-12p70, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL4, IL5, IL6, KC/GRO and TNF-α) by the MSD method in cell culture supernatant. APG-1387 induced ID8 to release more IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-12p70, and TNF-α (Fig. 2A), which were necessary for T-cell proliferation and function.
Next, we wonder whether these cytokines instrumental to the synergistic effect between APG-1387 and the anti-PD-1 antibody. To answer this question, we assessed another four cancer cells within the same experimental setting, including MC38 and CT26 colon cancer, B16 melanoma, and Hepa1-6 hepatoma. A similar pattern of changes in cytokines was observed in MC38 and Hepa1-6, but not the other two cell lines (Fig. 2A). Meanwhile, APG-1387 stimulated quiescent C57 splenocytes to express more IL-1β, IL-10, and IFN- γ (Fig. 2B-D).
In order to further investigate the in vivo antitumor efficacy of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody across different tumor types, B16 melanoma, Hepa1-6 hepatoma carcinoma, and MC38 colon cancer models were established in C57/B6 mice. The mice-bearing tumors were randomly divided into four groups and administered with either the vehicle control, APG-1387, anti-PD-1 antibody, or a combination of both. Throughout the duration of the experiment, tumor volume was measured in each group to assess antitumor activity. In the B16 melanoma model and Hepa1-6 hepatoma carcinoma model, the combination of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody did not demonstrate a synergistic antitumor effect compared to the single agent group (Fig. 2E-F). However, in the MC38 colon cancer model, APG-1387 combined with anti-PD-1 antibody generated a much higher anticancer activity compared with that of either drug alone, and prolonged mouse survival (Fig. 2G-H). One-quarter of the mice in the combination group were cured. These results indicate that APG-1387-stimulated release of IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-12p70, and TNF-α from the tumor were necessary but not sufficient for the synergistic effect between APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody.
APG-1387-induced CD3 + NK1.1 + cells infiltration in tumor tissue plays an important role in mediating the synergistic effect of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 treatments
As a single agent, APG-1387 inhibited tumor growth in MC38 models in vivo but had no proapoptotic effect on MC38 cells in vitro (Fig. 3A-B). We thus hypothesized that APG-1387 might play a role in mediating immune-cell functions. To evaluate this hypothesis, we established and implemented additional experiments on APG-1387 treatment in the MC38 model. On the second day after the final APG-1387 treatment, we isolated immune cells from the spleen, draining lymph nodes, and tumors of mice. Nine subsets of immune cells were analyzed between the treatment and control groups, including CD4+, CD8+, Treg, and NK cells. APG-1387 significantly upregulated the proportions of both effector memory spleen CD8+ and CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3C-E) and PD-1-positive spleen CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3F-G). In ID8 artificial ascites, we also found that APG-1387 upregulated PD-1 expression in CD8+ (Fig. 3H-I) and effector memory CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3J-K) in the ascites immune cells.
APG-1387 had no effect (vs. vehicle control) on the ratio of immune cell subgroups in the spleen and draining lymph nodes but significantly increased the proportion of CD45 + NK1.1 + cells in tumor tissues (Fig. 3L-M). Further, we figured out that APG-1387 upregulated CD3 + NK1.1 + cells in tumor tissues in MC38 model (Fig. 3N-O). More interestingly, the Hepa1-6 hepatoma model, which had a similar cytokines panel response to APG-1387 as ID8 (but without response to the combination of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody; Fig. 2F), there was no difference in proportions of CD45 + NK1.1 + cells in tumors between APG-1387 treatment and vehicle control (Fig. 3P). On the basis of these findings, we concluded that APG-1387-induced CD3 + NK1.1 + infiltration in tumor tissues played a critical role in mediating the synergistic effects of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody treatments.
IL-12 blockade abrogates the synergistic effect of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody
What was the relationship between changes in cytokines and tumor infiltration by CD3 + NK1.1 + cells? Among the cytokines, IL-12 was unique because it was produced only by tumors but not T cells. To address whether IL-12 is the key cytokine for CD3 + NK1.1 + cell recruitment, we blocked it by using an anti-IL-12p40 antibody in vivo. With IL-12p40 blockade, we found that the synergistic effect of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody was reduced in MC38 colon cancer and ID8 ovarian cancer models (Fig. 4A-B). In the ID8 model, adding an anti-IL-12p40 antibody in the triple treatment group tended to downregulate infiltration of CD3 + NK1.1+, CD3, and CD8 T cells compared to the APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 combination group (Fig. 4C-E). Consequently, IL-12 blockade might abolish the synergistic effect of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody by reducing tumor tissue infiltration by effective immune killing cells.
The synergistic effect between APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody is mediated by IFN-γ
APG-1387 had a costimulatory effect on activated PBMCs, with RNA expression profiles suggesting a significant upregulation of IFN-γ (Fig. 5A). In the MC38 colon cancer model, APG-1387 stimulated immune cells to secrete more IFN-γ, as demonstrated by flow cytometry (Fig. 5B). Studying in-vitro culture system of MC38 and splenocytes from MC38-cured mice with the treatment of IgG, APG-1387, or anti-PD-1 antibody, or the combination of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody, we found that the combination group produced significantly more IFN-γ (Fig. 5C). Meanwhile, in ID8 artificial ascites, the combination treatment tended to increase IFN-γ levels, according to MSD cytokine detection (Fig. 5D).
Discussion
Although ICIs have revolutionized the treatment of many malignant tumors, the efficacy is still unsatisfactory in some patients. For example, the MSS subtype, which comprises 95% of patients with CRC, does not respond to these agents.
There are two possible explanations for this phenomenon [5, 22]. First, is endogenous resistance in tumor cells, such as tumor antigen deficiency (low tumor mutation burden). Second is exogenous resistance of these cells, such as T-cell deletions; expression of other inhibitory molecules, such as V-domain Ig suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA), lymphocyte-activation-protein 3 (LAG-3), and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3); and recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages and Tregs.
Surmounting endogenous and exogenous resistance and expanding the population of patients who might benefit from CPIs will likely be the next focus in tumor immunotherapy. Among several efforts to augment PD-1-blocking treatment, changing the tumor microenvironment (TME) from “cold” to “hot” is believed to be the most promising strategy. A previous study showed that Smac mimics promoted multiple myeloma cells with intact noncanonical NF-κB pathway to secrete type I-IFN, thereby inducing phagocytosis of multiple myeloma cells by macrophages [11]. Recently, interim clinical data on IAP inhibitor birinapant combined with pembrolizumab demonstrated that 1 of 12 patients with solid tumors had a confirmed PR to treatment: an individual with MSS CRC. However, as mentioned previously, no efficacy was seen upon treatment with a high dose of birinapant, which was determined by safety consideration [12].
In our study, APG-1387 at low dose conferred immune regulatory effects on certain tumor and immune cells both in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, our findings suggest that a low dose of an IAP inhibitor may sensitize some tumors to anti-PD-1 treatment and save effector cells from death. However, the traditional clinical dose selection dependent on toxicity could lead to selection of high-dose IAP inhibitors when combined with anti-PD-1 CPIs in clinical trials, culminating in trial failure. Therefore, dose selection based on pharmacodynamics, rather than toxicity, is critical for this combination.
In a previous study, we found that APG-1387 up-regulated the expression of HLA-DR in PLC/PRF/5 via activating the non-canonical NF-κB pathway [16]. In our study, we discovered that certain tumor cells could secrete more cytokines essential for T-cell and NK-like cell proliferation and activation during APG-1387 treatment in vitro, and that these tumors were effectively inhibited by APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody in vivo.
Our data indicate that APG-1387 could increase more positive-regulatory cytokines for tumor-killing immune cells. IL-12 is an important growth factor for activated T cells and NK cells that is required for T cell-independent induction of IFN-γ and induces TH1 (helper) cells together with IFN-γ and type I IFN [23]. Simultaneously IL-12 also augment the CD3 + NK1.1 + cells induced from hepatic mononuclear cells [24]. It is mediated by the transcriptional protein signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4) activator and is regulated by NF-κB [25]. Recent studies have found that the intestinal flora Akkermansia muciniphila restores the efficacy of PD-1 blockade by increasing recruitment of CCR9+ CXCR3+ CD4+ T lymphocytes to mouse tumor beds in an IL-12-dependent manner [26]. It has also been reported that one dose of an IAP inhibitor could stimulate dendrite cells to secrete IL-12 [27]. To our surprise, we have observed that APG-1387 can induce secretion of IL-12 in tumor cells. Conversely, blocking IL-12 in vivo could abrogate the synergistic effect of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody combination treatment, which suggests that IL-12 plays a key role in this synergetic effect.
Moreover, in our study PD-1 antibody treatment promoted the production of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNFα but did not increase IL-12 level. However, systemic administration of IL-12 is too toxic for human body to terminate those IL-12 related clinical trial. By rising local level of IL-12 in tumor tissue, APG-1387 could resolve the safety concern caused by systemic administration of IL-12. Taken together, we found that IL-12 was a unique cytokine only produced by some tumors, which indicating that the synergistic effect for IAP inhibitor combined with anti-PD-1 is model dependent. IL-12 may be used as a biomarker to predict this synergistic effect.
Our previous study showed that APG-1387 significantly upregulated NK cells in PLC/PRF5 tumors in vivo. Here, in mouse tumor models with responses to combination therapy, more CD3 + NK1.1 + cells were seen in the tumor bed rather than in spleen or draining lymph nodes, indicating that APG-1387 shaped the TME by not only producing multiple cytokines but also further increasing the number of effector tumor-killing immune cells. Obviously, CD3 + NK1.1 + cells mediate the crucial immune modulatory effect of APG-1387 in solid tumors. As we know that CD3 + NK1.1 + cells are commonly called NKT cells and have similar killing function as NK cells, are the first frontier for malignant cell elimination [28], also, importance of the Th1/Th2 differentiation by NKT cells in PD-L1 negative cancer has been revealed recently [29]. Moreover, NKT cells, in addition to T cells, mediate the effect of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy [30, 31].
Consequently, our research indicates that, by increasing more CD3 + NK1.1 + cells in tumors, APG-1387 shows promise in converting “cold” into “hot” tumors and eventually leads to synergistic effects of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in certain tumor types and under the appropriate conditions (including an appropriate dose).
Conclusions
The Smac mimetic APG-1387 modulates multiple aspects of tumor immunity and confers a significant synergistic effect when combined with anti-PD-1 antibody by releasing certain cytokines. APG-1387 upregulated tumor-infiltrating CD3 + NK1.1 + cells by cytokines induced from tumor cells. This study provides solid preclinical evidence for combination therapy of APG-1387 and anti-PD-1 antibodies in clinical trials, especially in tumor type selection and dose selection. These promising but preliminary findings provide a rationale to evaluate the safety and therapeutic effect of this combination in clinical studies, in particular a phase 1/2 trial involving patients with advanced solid tumors or hematologic malignancies (NCT03386526).
Data availability
The data of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Research Data Deposit number: RDDB2018000471.
References
Larkin J, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):23–34.
Le DT, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2509–20.
Antonia SJ, et al. Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):883–95.
Drug Combo bests Sunitinib in RCC. Cancer Discov, 2018. 8(4): p. Of4.
Kim TK, et al. Adaptive immune resistance at the tumour site: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(7):529–40.
Sun C, et al. NMR structure and mutagenesis of the inhibitor-of-apoptosis protein XIAP. Nature. 1999;401(6755):818–22.
Augello C, et al. Inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) expression and their prognostic significance in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:125.
Dai Z, et al. A comprehensive search for DNA amplification in lung cancer identifies inhibitors of apoptosis cIAP1 and cIAP2 as candidate oncogenes. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(7):791–801.
Rathore R, et al. Overcoming chemotherapy drug resistance by targeting inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). Apoptosis. 2017;22(7):898–919.
Hao Q, Tang H. Interferon-Gamma and Smac mimetics synergize to induce apoptosis of lung cancer cells in a TNFalpha-independent manner. Cancer Cell Int. 2018;18:84.
Chesi M, et al. IAP antagonists induce anti-tumor immunity in multiple myeloma. Nat Med. 2016;22(12):1411–20.
Dose-escalation study of birinapant and pembrolizumab in solid tumors; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02587962. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02587962.
A dose-finding study of the second mitochondrial activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetic Debio 1143 when given in combination with avelumab to participants with advanced solid malignancies and to participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based therapy; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03270176. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03270176.
A trial to find the safe dose for BI 891065 alone and in combination with BI 754091 in patients with incurable tumours or tumours that have spread; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03166631. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03166631.
A study of PDR001 in combination with LCL161, everolimus or panobinostat; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02890069. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02890069.
Pan W, et al. A novel SMAC mimetic APG-1387 exhibits dual antitumor effect on HBV-positive hepatocellular carcinoma with high expression of cIAP2 by inducing apoptosis and enhancing innate anti-tumor immunity. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;154:127–35.
Xu R, et al. A phase I study of a novel IAP inhibitor APG-1387 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15suppl):2593–2593.
Rasco DW, et al. A phase I study of a novel IAP inhibitor APG-1387 as a monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab in treatments of patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15suppl):3125–3125.
Li BX, et al. Novel smac mimetic APG-1387 elicits ovarian cancer cell killing through TNF-alpha, Ripoptosome and autophagy mediated cell death pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):53.
Li N, et al. A novel Smac mimetic APG-1387 demonstrates potent antitumor activity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by inducing apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 2016;381(1):14–22.
Ji J, et al. XIAP limits autophagic degradation of Sox2 and is a therapeutic target in nasopharyngeal carcinoma stem cells. Theranostics. 2018;8(6):1494–510.
O’Donnell JS, et al. Resistance to PD1/PDL1 checkpoint inhibition. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;52:71–81.
Carreno BM, et al. IL-12p70-producing patient DC vaccine elicits Tc1-polarized immunity. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(8):3383–94.
Hashimoto W, et al. Cytotoxic NK1.1 ag + alpha beta T cells with intermediate TCR induced in the liver of mice by IL-12. J Immunol. 1995;154(9):4333–40.
Oppmann B, et al. Novel p19 protein engages IL-12p40 to form a cytokine, IL-23, with biological activities similar as well as distinct from IL-12. Immunity. 2000;13(5):715–25.
Routy B, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018;359(6371):91–7.
Garris CS, et al. Successful Anti-PD-1 Cancer Immunotherapy requires T cell-dendritic cell crosstalk involving the cytokines IFN-γ and IL-12. Immunity. 2018;49(6):1148–e11617.
Vicari AP, Zlotnik A. Mouse NK1.1 + T cells: a new family of T cells. Immunol Today. 1996;17(2):71–6.
Zhong R, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals cellular and molecular immune profile in a Pembrolizumab-responsive PD-L1-negative lung cancer patient. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70(8):2261–74.
Nelson A et al. Natural killer T cell immunotherapy combined with IL-15-expressing oncolytic virotherapy and PD-1 blockade mediates pancreatic tumor regression. J Immunother Cancer, 2022. 10(3).
Bae EA, et al. Activation of NKT Cells in an Anti-PD-1-Resistant Tumor Model enhances Antitumor Immunity by reinvigorating exhausted CD8 T cells. Cancer Res. 2018;78(18):5315–26.
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff of the Department of Experimental Research of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, who provided various instruction and support.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 82172748, 82073377 and 81772587); Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (2021A1515012439); the third outstanding young talents training plan and Medical Scientist program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DJY, MZQ and YFZ conceived and directed the project. WTP designed and performed most of the experiments and wrote the manuscript. MZQ helped with writing the manuscript. QYL, EL and MDS designed and performed the animal experiments. JS helped to edit the manuscript. XLY, SNZ and LPY performed in vitro experiments. HJY and YXZ performed statistical analysis. HMS, ZHL and LZ provided key services, materials, and guidance and commented on manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We obtained animal ethics approval from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, W., Luo, Q., Liang, E. et al. Synergistic effects of Smac mimetic APG-1387 with anti-PD-1 antibody are attributed to increased CD3 + NK1.1 + cell recruitment secondary to induction of cytokines from tumor cells. Cancer Cell Int 24, 181 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-024-03373-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-024-03373-7