Open Access

Genetic polymorphisms of STAT3 correlated with prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab

Contributed equally
Cancer Cell International201414:25

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-14-25

Received: 2 January 2014

Accepted: 10 March 2014

Published: 13 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Rituximab in the combination of CHOP chemotherapy has been widely used as the standard treatment for several kinds of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Inactivation of phosphorylation of STAT3 plays an essential role in rituximab-induced anti-proliferative activity in B-cell lymphoma. However, the relationship between STAT3 genetic polymorphisms and clinical response to standard frontline treatment with rituximab has not been well illustrated yet.

Methods

In this study we analyzed the STAT3 polymorphisms and prognosis of 166 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who were treated with rituximab from 2007 to 2010. Determination of the STAT3 polymorphisms of rs2293152 from genomic DNA was achieved by Sanger chain termination sequencing.

Results

We did not observe obvious correlation between patients’ disease features and STAT3 polymorphisms, but patients with homozygous genotypes at rs2293162 showed a trend of higher CR rate than those with the heterozygous genotype, especially in non-GCB subgroup (p = 0.011). Furthermore, homozygous genotypes GG and CC also showed advantages of long-term survival compared with heterozygous genotype patients (p = 0.022).

Conclusions

These results suggest that STAT3 polymorphisms could be a suitable biomarker related to clinical outcome of DLBCL patients treated with rituximab.

Keywords

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma STAT3 Single nucleotide polymorphism Rituximab

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) subtype [1]. The introduction of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy is considered as the standard treatment for DLBCL patients, which dramatically improves the treatment outcome and prognosis [2]. However, a great number of B-NHL patients treated with this immunotherapy still develop primary and secondary resistance to rituximab [3]. Thus, novel prognostic factors are being explored to predict treatment outcome.

STAT3 is a member of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family, which regulates many cellular and biological processes such as cell proliferation, division, and apoptosis via mediation of related genes expression [4, 5]. Constitutively activated STAT3 has been demonstrated to be essential for the proliferation and survival of DLBCL cells, which provides a prognostic indicator and ideal target for DLBCL treatment [6, 7]. Despite the activation of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), many studies have demonstrated that rituximab could also induce apoptosis by inhibiting phosphorylation of STAT3 in DLBCL cells [8, 9]. We hypothesized that polymorphic differences in STAT3 may account for distinct clinical efficacy of rituximab in DLBCL patients.

In our study, initially several important single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in STAT3 (including rs2293152, rs6503695, and rs12949918), which have been associated with gene expression and lymphoma risk [10, 11], were analyzed in 166 peripheral blood specimens from DLBCL patients treated with rituximab. During the following investigation of relationships between the polymorphisms and clinical outcome, we eventually identified the prognostic significance of STAT3 polymorphisms in rs2293152, which could be a suitable predictor related to rituximab efficacy.

Results

Patients’ characteristics

The general characteristics of the patients (82 male and 84 female patients) in this study are summarized in Table 1. Sixty-three patients (38.0%) exhibited B symptoms. Eighty-eight patients (53.0%) were in stages 3 or 4, and 50 patients (30.1%) had intermediate-to-high or high international prognostic index (IPI) scores. Bone marrow was involved by lymphoma in 5 patients (3.0%) at diagnosis. R-CHOP or R-CHOP like treatment as a frontline regimen was administrated to 166 patients whose clinical efficacy was evaluable for this study.
Table 1

Patient’s characteristics and their correlations with STAT3 polymorphism genotypes

Clinical parameters

No.

Genotype

p

Clinical parameters

No.

Genotype

p

  

CC + GG

CG

   

CC + GG

CG

 

Gender

    

IPI score

    

Male

82

50

32

0.042

0-2

116

61

55

0.867

Female

84

38

46

 

3-5

50

27

23

 

Age

    

Bulky mass

    

≤60

106

59

47

0.364

≥10 cm

33

19

14

0.557

>60

60

29

31

 

<10 cm

133

69

64

 

B symptoms

    

Localized

    

Positive

63

31

32

0.442

Yes

27

17

10

0.258

Negative

103

57

46

 

No

139

71

68

 

LDH

    

Extra Nodal Site

    

Positive

78

39

39

0.464

≤1

123

64

59

0.669

Negative

88

49

39

 

>1

43

24

19

 

β-2 MG

    

Incidence Site

    

Positive

51

23

28

0.091

Lymph node

95

46

49

0.170

Negative

106

63

43

 

Extra lymph

71

42

29

 

ESR

    

Ki-67

    

Positive

77

36

41

0.132

≤75

66

32

34

0.329

Negative

80

47

33

 

>75

85

48

37

 

Stage

    

Subtype

    

I-II

78

42

36

0.839

GCB

29

18

11

0.229

III-IV

88

46

42

 

Non-GCB

113

56

57

 

STAT3 polymorphisms

STAT3 polymorphisms at rs2293152 in 166 patients were identified (Table 2). Thirty-one patients (18.7%) had homozygous CC genotype; 57 patients (34.3%), GG; and 78 patients (47.0%), heterozygous CG. The frequency of the C allele in DLBCL patients was 44.7%, and that of the G allele was 55.3%. The genotype distribution of the DLBCL population enrolled in our study was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium with regard to the STAT3 polymorphisms examined.
Table 2

Genotype and allele frequencies of STAT3 polymorphisms in 166 Chinese patients with DLBCL

SNP

Genotype frequencies

 

Genotype

Freq

Count

Genotype

Freq

Count

Genotype

Freq

Count

Total

rs2293152

CC

0.187

31

CG

0.470

78

GG

0.343

57

166

SNP

Allele frequencies

Allele

Freq

Count

Allele

Freq

Count

Total

rs2293152

C

0.447

109

G

0.553

135

244

Correlation analysis between STAT3 polymorphisms and clinical features of DLBCL patients

Analysis of STAT3 polymorphisms of rs2293152 suggested that patients with homozygous CC and GG genotypes had a higher tendency to be male than those with the heterozygous genotype (p = 0.042). Furthermore, our data showed that an elevated β2-MG level might be less frequent in patients with homozygous genotypes than in those with the heterozygous CG genotype (p = 0.091). The distribution of this STAT3 polymorphisms did not correlate with the germinal center B cell-like (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes (p = 0.229; Table 1).

Impact of the STAT3 polymorphisms on the curative effect of rituximab

Of the 166 patients evaluable for response to R-CHOP and R-CHOP-like chemotherapy, the overall response rate (ORR) was 86.1% (143 of 166 patients), including a complete response (CR) rate of 52.4% (87 of 166 patients) and a partial response (PR) rate of 33.7% (56 of 166 patients). As shown in Table 3, higher CR rate was observed in patients with homozygous genotypes than in those with the heterozygous CG genotype (p = 0.032). In subgroup analysis based on the GCB/non-GCB molecular types, patients with homozygous genotypes also showed better CR rate than heterozygous genotype in non-GCB DLBCL patients (p = 0.011).
Table 3

Clinical response to rituximab according to STAT3 polymorphism genotypes

Response

Genotype

p

 

CC + GG

CG

 

All patients

   

   CR

53(60.2)

34(43.6)

0.032

PR + PD + SD

35(39.8)

44(56.4)

 

   OR

77(87.5)

66(84.6)

0.591

  PD + SD

11(12.5)

12(15.4)

 

GCB subtype

   

   CR

14(77.8)

8(72.7)

0.758

PR + PD + SD

4(22.2)

3(27.3)

 

   OR

17(94.4)

11(100)

0.426

  PD + SD

1(5.6)

0(0)

 

Non-GCB subtype

   

   CR

32(57.1)

19(33.3)

0.011

PR + PD + SD

24(42.9)

38(66.7)

 

   OR

46(82.1)

46(80.7)

0.844

  PD + SD

10(17.9)

11(19.3)

 

Relationship between the STAT3 genotypes and time to progression-free survival and overall survival

After a median follow-up time of 913 days (range, 60–2591 days), 19 (11.4%) patients relapsed or progressed, and 39 (23.5%) died. Six patients were enrolled in a RAD001 maintenance therapy clinical study, and follow-up data were not available for 12 patients. Therefore, a total of 148 patients were evaluated for PFS and OS. Patients with homozygous genotypes had a median PFS of 909 days (range, 60–1851) versus 920 days (range, 78–2591) for the heterozygous CG genotype patients, but the differences between these two groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.227). Interestingly, a longer OR was observed in patients with homozygous genotypes (range, 60–1851) compared with heterozygous CG genotype patients (range, 170–2591; p = 0.022), suggesting that STAT3 polymorphisms could be useful markers to predict the long-term outcome of rituximab treatment (Figure 1). However, this difference was not observed when patients were subdivided into GCB and non-GCB groups (data not shown).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier Curves for Progression-free Survival and Overall Survival in DLBCL patients.

In the multivariate analysis, we attempted to evaluate the following variables on OS: stage, age, LDH level, β2-microglobulin level, extranodal involvement, bulky mass, IPI score, B symptoms, and STAT3 polymorphism. This analysis also demonstrated that STAT3 polymorphism was an important determinant of poor prognosis (p = 0.006; HR 2.787; 95% CI 1.346-5.773; Table 4).
Table 4

Multivariate analysis of STAT3 polymorphisms on survival

Variable

Hazard ratio

95% CI

p

IPI score

2.792

1.407 - 5.544

0.003

STAT3 polymorphisms

2.787

1.346 - 5.773

0.006

B symptoms

0.420

0.210 - 0.839

0.014

Discussion

In this retrospective analysis, STAT3 polymorphisms at rs2293152 were found to associate with β2-MG levels and patient sex. Patients with a CC and GG genotypes at rs2293152 could benefit from rituximab-combined chemotherapy.

Rituximab is a single human mouse chimeric IgG antibody, which combines with the CD20 antigen on the surface of DLBCL cells, directly killing these tumor cells [12]. The antitumor activities of rituximab are mainly believed to be associated with the induction of ADCC and CDC [13]. Polymorphisms in FcγRIIIa, which plays an essential function in ADCC-induced lymphoma cell lysis, were found to relate to the clinical response of rituximab [14]. In a previous study, our group also demonstrated that polymorphisms in the key CDC regulator, gene C1qA, were related to the efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of DLBCL patients [15]. Furthermore, rituximab has also been suggested to induce apoptosis of lymphoma cells by the inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation. Various types of tumor cells exhibited constitutively phosphorylated STAT3 within the nucleus, which has been shown to promote uncontrolled malignant tumor growth and relate with a poor prognosis of patients [16, 17]. However, the effect of STAT3 polymorphisms on the clinical antitumor activities of rituximab has not been reported before. In our study, DLBCL patients with homozygous genotypes in STAT3 rs2293152 showed better CR rates. Furthermore, the impact of STAT3 polymorphisms on the treatment efficacy was also analyzed in GCB/non-GCB subgroups. Our results showed that patients with homozygous genotypes also showed higher CR rate than heterozygous genotype in non-GCB DLBCL but not in GCB DLBCL subgroup, which was consistent with previous reports that the activation of STAT3 plays a more important role in ABC-DLBCL than GCB-DLBCL [18, 19]. On the other hand, the STAT3 polymorphism positions such as rs6503695 and rs12949918 did not show any such relationship with CR and OR rates after rituximab treatment (data now shown).

Previously STAT3 polymorphisms had been shown to be suitable as predictive makers to analyze the response to IFN-α in renal cell carcinoma [20]. In that study, the SNP site within STAT3 resulted in a higher expression of STAT3, which might contribute to resistance after IFN-α treatment. The STAT3 SNP site rs2293152 C to G change is an intronic polymorphism, which does not directly introduce amino acid substitution. However, it is increasingly being reported that intron SNPs and silent polymorphisms could also alter the function of target proteins [21, 22]. Griseri et al. revealed that a synonymous polymorphism within TTP was associated with protein translation and clinical response rate to herceptin treatment in breast cancer patients [23]. An ERCC1 polymorphism, which induced a codon change from common usage codon AAC to AAT, has also been found to suppress ERCC1 expression, and the objective response rate was much higher after oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients [24]. In the previous analysis of rs2293152 locus of STAT3, Sato et al. reported that the CC genotype was found to be associated with the development of Clone Disease. The polymorphisms of STAT3 in rs2293152 may alter the function of STAT3, further activating the inflammatory signaling pathway and occurrence of the disease [25]. Thus, although rs2293152 is a synonymous polymorphism, this single nucleotide change might affect the phosphorylation level of STAT3, which could contribute to influence the curative effect of rituximab. However, further experimentation is needed to explore the precise mechanism by which STAT3 polymorphisms affect the lymphoma responses to R-CHOP chemotherapy.

Conclusions

The STAT3 polymorphism could be a predictive biomarker related to clinical outcome of DLBCL patients treated with rituximab.

Methods

Patient characteristics

A total of 166 consenting patients who received R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like chemotherapy (R-COP, R-COPP and R-CHOPE) as a frontline regimen between June 2007 and December 2010 were included in this retrospective study from Peking University Cancer Hospital. All patients had CD20+ DLBCL according to the World Health Organization classification, as confirmed by our Department of Pathology. Peripheral blood specimens from all lymphoma patients were obtained before the initiation of therapy. R-CHOP chemotherapy was administered as follows: one course of chemotherapy consisted of an intravenous infusion of 750 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m2 adriamycin, and 2 mg vincristine, and oral administration of 100 mg prednisone on days 1 to 5, which was repeated every 3 weeks. Rituximab (375 mg/m2) was infused for over 4–6 hours on day 1 before CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy was started. The response to R-CHOP therapy was evaluated after completion of 2–3 courses of therapy, 1–2 months after completion of all planned therapy, and then every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months thereafter until progression. This retrospective research protocol was approved by our Institutional Review Board.

DNA extraction and genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood with the Whole Blood Genome DNA Isolation Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Doraville, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was diluted in water to a final stock concentration of 30 ng/μl, and 1 μl was used in each PCR reaction. Determination of STAT3 polymorphism genotypes was achieved in a blinded manner on coded specimens by Sanger chain termination sequencing. Briefly, the genomic DNA region of interest was amplified using rs2293152 forward primer 5′GGTCACCTACATAGTTGATTG3′ and reverse primer 5′ACACCCCAGTTGTCTTTCATC3′. An initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 mins was followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s. The final extension step was for 10 mins. The PCR products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel. All fragments were purified with the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction kit (Axygen Sci. Inc., CA, USA). The purified products were sequenced using an ABI 3730XL Avant Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., CA, USA).

Definitions

Clinical responses were determined by physical examination and confirmed by computed tomography or ultrasonography. The latter was only used for evaluating superficial lymph nodes. The responses were scored according to the International Working Group criteria. Overall survival (OS) was measured from day 1 of the first cycle of R-CHOP until death from any cause or the last follow-up available. The progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from day 1 of the first cycle of R-CHOP to disease progression or death from any cause.

Statistical analysis

The clinical characteristics and response rate of the patients were compared using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the differences of PFS and OS. The Cox regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic factors. Differences between groups were regarded as significant at p < 0.05. SPSS16.0 was used for all statistical analysis.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by NSFC (No. 81201873 and 81241073), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 7132050) and “985” Basic Research Fund from Peking University.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Lymphoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
(2)
Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guiyang Medical College, Guizhou Cancer Hospital
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine Oncology, Peking University First Hospital

References

  1. Campo E, Swerdlow SH, Harris NL, Pileri S, Stein H, Jaffe ES: The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications. Blood. 2011, 117 (19): 5019-5032. 10.1182/blood-2011-01-293050.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sehn LH, Donaldson J, Chhanabhai M, Fitzgerald C, Gill K, Klasa R, MacPherson N, O’Reilly S, Spinelli JJ, Sutherland J, Wilson KS, Gascoyne RD, Connors JM: Introduction of combined CHOP plus rituximab therapy dramatically improved outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (22): 5027-5033. 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Smith MR: Rituximab (monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody): mechanisms of action and resistance. Oncogene. 2003, 22 (47): 7359-7368. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206939.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhong Z, Wen Z, Darnell JEJ: Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science. 1994, 264 (5155): 95-98. 10.1126/science.8140422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Al Zaid Siddiquee K, Turkson J: STAT3 as a target for inducing apoptosis in solid and hematological tumors. Cell Res. 2008, 18 (2): 254-267. 10.1038/cr.2008.18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding BB, Yu JJ, Yu RY, Mendez LM, Shaknovich R, Zhang Y, Cattoretti G, Ye BH: Constitutively activated STAT3 promotes cell proliferation and survival in the activated B-cell subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2008, 111 (3): 1515-1523.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wu ZL, Song YQ, Shi YF, Zhu J: High nuclear expression of STAT3 is associated with unfavorable prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2011, 4 (1): 31-10.1186/1756-8722-4-31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Alas S, Bonavida B: Rituximab inactivates signal transducer and activation of transcription 3 (STAT3) activity in B-non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma through inhibition of the interleukin 10 autocrine/paracrine loop and results in down-regulation of Bcl-2 and sensitization to cytotoxic drugs. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (13): 5137-5144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrd JC, Kitada S, Flinn IW, Aron JL, Pearson M, Lucas D, Reed JC: The mechanism of tumor cell clearance by rituximab in vivo in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: evidence of caspase activation and apoptosis induction. Blood. 2002, 99 (3): 1038-1043. 10.1182/blood.V99.3.1038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kreil S, Waghorn K, Ernst T, Chase A, White H, Hehlmann R, Reiter A, Hochhaus A, Cross NC: A polymorphism associated with STAT3 expression and response of chronic myeloid leukemia to interferon alpha. Haematologica. 2010, 95 (1): 148-152. 10.3324/haematol.2009.011510.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Lan Q, Zheng T, Zhao N, Holford TR, Lerro C, Dai M, Huang H, Liang J, Ma S, Leaderer B, Boyle P, Chanock S, Rothman N, Zhang Y: Polymorphisms in JAK/STAT signaling pathway genes and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Res. 2013, 37 (9): 1120-1124. 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.05.003.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagemeister F: Rituximab for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Drugs. 2010, 70 (3): 261-272. 10.2165/11532180-000000000-00000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Golay J, Zaffaroni L, Vaccari T, Lazzari M, Borleri GM, Bernasconi S, Tedesco F, Rambaldi A, Introna M: Biologic response of B lymphoma cells to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in vitro: CD55 and CD59 regulate complement-mediated cell lysis. Blood. 2000, 95 (12): 3900-3908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cartron G, Dacheux L, Salles G, Solal-Celigny P, Bardos P, Colombat P, Watier H: Therapeutic activity of humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor FcgammaRIIIa gene. Blood. 2002, 99 (3): 754-758. 10.1182/blood.V99.3.754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jin X, Ding H, Ding N, Fu Z, Song Y, Zhu J: Homozygous A polymorphism of the complement C1qA276 correlates with prolonged overall survival in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. J Hematol Oncol. 2012, 5 (1): 51-56. 10.1186/1756-8722-5-51.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bromberg JF, Wrzeszczynska MH, Devgan G, Zhao Y, Pestell RG, Albanese C, Darnell JEJ: Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell. 1999, 98 (3): 295-303. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81959-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R: STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9 (11): 798-809. 10.1038/nrc2734.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Scuto A, Kujawski M, Kowolik C, Krymskaya L, Wang L, Weiss LM, Digiusto D, Yu H, Forman S, Jove R: STAT3 inhibition is a therapeutic strategy for ABC-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2011, 71 (9): 3182-3188. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2380.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang X, Meng B, Iqbal J, Ding BB, Perry AM, Cao W, Smith LM, Bi C, Jiang C, Greiner TC, Weisenburger DD, Rimsza L, Rosenwald A, Ott G, Delabie J, Campo E, Braziel RM, Gascoyne RD, Cook JR, Tubbs RR, Jaffe ES, Armitage JO, Vose JM, Staudt LM, McKeithan TW, Chan WC, Ye BH, Fu K: Activation of the STAT3 signaling pathway is associated with poor survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. J Clin Oncol. 2013, 31 (36): 4520-4528. 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.6004.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ito N, Eto M, Nakamura E, Takahashi A, Tsukamoto T, Toma H, Nakazawa H, Hirao Y, Uemura H, Kagawa S, Kanayama H, Nose Y, Kinukawa N, Nakamura T, Jinnai N, Seki T, Takamatsu M, Masui Y, Naito S, Ogawa O: STAT3 polymorphism predicts interferon-alfa response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25 (19): 2785-2791. 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.8897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Oh JM, Kim IW, Sauna ZE, Calcagno AM, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM: A “silent” polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science. 2007, 315 (5811): 525-528. 10.1126/science.1135308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sauna ZE, Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM: Silent polymorphisms speak: how they affect pharmacogenomics and the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (20): 9609-9612. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2377.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Griseri P, Bourcier C, Hieblot C, Essafi-Benkhadir K, Chamorey E, Touriol C, Pages G: A synonymous polymorphism of the Tristetraprolin (TTP) gene, an AU-rich mRNA-binding protein, affects translation efficiency and response to Herceptin treatment in breast cancer patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20 (23): 4556-4568. 10.1093/hmg/ddr390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Viguier J, Boige V, Miquel C, Pocard M, Giraudeau B, Sabourin JC, Ducreux M, Sarasin A, Praz F: ERCC1 codon 118 polymorphism is a predictive factor for the tumor response to oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (17): 6212-6217. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sato K, Shiota M, Fukuda S, Iwamoto E, Machida H, Inamine T, Kondo S, Yanagihara K, Isomoto H, Mizuta Y, Kohno S, Tsukamoto K: Strong evidence of a combination polymorphism of the tyrosine kinase 2 gene and the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 gene as a DNA-based biomarker for susceptibility to Crohn’s disease in the Japanese population. J Clin Immunol. 2009, 29 (6): 815-825. 10.1007/s10875-009-9320-x.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement