Skip to main content

MEX3A knockdown inhibits the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is one of the most serious causes of death in the world due to its high mortality and inefficacy treatments. MEX3A was first identified in nematodes and was associated with tumor formation and may promote cell proliferation and tumor metastasis. So far, nothing is known about the relationship between MEX3A and PDA.

Methods

In this study, the expression level of MEX3A in PDA tissues was measured by immunohistochemistry. The qRT-PCR and western blot were used to identify the constructed MEX3A knockdown cell lines, which was further used to construct mouse xenotransplantation models. Cell proliferation, colony formation, cell apoptosis and migration were detected by MTT, colony formation, flow cytometry and Transwell.

Results

This study showed that MEX3A expression is significantly upregulated in PDA and associated with tumor grade. Loss-of-function studies showed that downregulation of MEX3A could inhibit cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, it was demonstrated that knockdown of MEX3A in PDA cells promotes apoptosis by regulating apoptosis-related factors, and inhibits migration through influencing EMT. At the same time, the regulation of PDA progression by MEX3A involves changes in downstream signaling pathways including Akt, p-Akt, PIK3CA, CDK6 and MAPK9.

Conclusions

We proposed that MEX3A is associated with the prognosis and progression of PDA,which can be used as a potential therapeutic target.

Introduction

To date, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. A large part of PDAC patients can only be diagnosed at an advanced stage and have non-specific symptoms before clinical manifestations. PDA mortality is almost equal to its morbidity and it is a fatal disease [2, 3]. After the intervention of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy, the 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is still less than 8% [4]. Moreover, distant metastases occur in 60% of patients within 24 months of surgery [5]. Albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in combination with gemcitabine and fluorouracil is widely used as first-line treatment for metastatic PDA to improve survival and overall response rate [6,7,8]. Unfortunately, with the emergence of gemcitabine and fluorouracil resistance, the therapeutic efficacy of GEM in pancreatic cancer is declining [7, 8]. Recent research on PDA pointed out that the abnormal expression of genes or proteins plays an important role in the occurrence and development of this tumor [9, 10]. In general, it is urgent to deepen the understanding of the molecular mechanism of PDA and find new therapeutic targets.

MEX3 has a conserved region of 65 to 70 amino acids, including two K homology domains and one human gene family homologous to MEX3, MEX3A-D [11]. MEX3A is located in the paratope (156,072,013–156,081,998) and has 9986 base pairs [11]. The RNA-binding protein of evolutionarily conserved MEX3 family are first characterized in heterogeneous ribonucleoproteins, as mediators of post-transcriptional regulation in different organisms, participating in different physiological environments [12]. MEX3A has been identified to be associated with diseases, especially cancer, such as Wilms tumors [13], gastric carcinomas [14], colorectal carcinomas [15]. It is important to determine their effects on cancer development and assess their potential of cancer progression or prognosis.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The PDA cell lines PANC-1 and SW1990 were cultured in 6-well plates with 5% CO2 in 37 °C humid air and supplemented with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The medium was changed every 72 h, and subculture was performed with 0.05% trypsin and 0.02% EDTA at a concentration of 80%. After 24 h in DMEM without FBS, followup experiments were performed.

Target gene RNA interferes with the preparation of lentiviral vector

MEX3A was used as a template to design multiple RNA interference target sequences, and the target sequence (5′-AGGCAAGGCTGCAAGATTAAG-3′) with the highest MEX3A knockdown efficiency was screened for downstream experiments. BRV-112 linear vector (Shanghai bioscienceres Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) was obtained by restriction endonuclease Age I (NEB, # R3552L) and EcoR I (NEB, # R3101L) digestion. Construction of target gene RNA interference lentiviral vector. The products were transformed into the 100 µL TOP10 competent cells of Escherichia coli (TIANGEN, # CB104-03). After that, positive clones with correct sequencing were selected by PCR and then plasmids were extracted by using plasmid extraction kit (TIANGEN, # DP117). Virus packaging Helper plasmid (Helper 1.0, Helper 2.0) and the target plasmid were co-infected into 293T (lentivirus packaging cells). The supernatant of 293T cells was collected 48 h after infection for the quality test of lentivirus. Lentivirus vectors were labeled with fluorescence and observed under fluorescence microscope after infection 72 h (GFP, Cherry).

qRT-PCR

Total RNA extraction according to sigma Trizol instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA reverse transcription was used to obtain cDNA using vazyme Hiscript QRT super mix (gDNA wiper) (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The qRT-PCR was performed by using AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). GAPDH was used as a reference control.

Primer nameSequence
MEX3A Primer-FCGGAGTGGACTCTGGCTTTGAG
MEX3A Primer-RCAGAGGAGAAGAGCACGGAGGT
GAPDH Primer-FTGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA
GAPDH Primer-RCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA

Western blot analysis

The PDA cell lines PANC-1 and SW1990 were collected and lysed with RIPA lysis buffer (Cell Signal Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) according to the instructions. Quantitative extraction of proteins with BCA Protein Assay Kit (HyClone-Pierce, Waltham, MA, USA, # 23225). Then western blot analysis was performed by SDS-PAGE (10%). The protein was transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane and incubated with 5% BSA containing 0.5% Tween 20 for 60 min, then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies (see primary antibody information table for western blot). After washing with TBST, the blot was incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labeled polyclonal secondary antibody (1:3000) (Beyotime, Beijing, China, # A0208) at room temperature for 1 h. ECL and plus TM western blot system kit (Amersham, Chalfont, UK, # RPN2232) were used for color development.

Name of antibodyProtein size (kDa)Diluted multiplesSource of primary antibodyCompanyNumber
MEX3A541:1000RabbitAbcamAB79046
N-cadherin1251:1000RabbitAbcamAB18203
Vimentin541:2000RabbitAbcamAB92547
Snail291:1000RabbitAbcam3879S
Akt601:1000RabbitCST4685
p-Akt601:1000RabbitBiossBS5193R
CDK6371:1000RabbitAbcamAB15127
PIK3CA1101:1000RabbitAbcamAB40776
MAPK9481:1000RabbitAbcamAB76125
GAPDH371:3000RabbitBioworldAP0063

MTT assay

First, PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were trypsinized, completely suspended and counted. The cell density was 2000 cells/well and inoculated to 96-well plates (100 µL/well) (Corning, Corning, NT, USA, # 3599) overnight, and the cells were repeated 3–5 times in each group. 5 mg/mL MTT (5 mg/mL) (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) (Genview, Beijing, China; # JT343) 20 μL was added 4 h before the end of the culture from the day after the planking, without changing the fluid. After 4 h, the medium was completely removed, 100 µL DMSO was added. The oscillator was oscillated for 5 min, OD value was detected by the enzyme-connected immunodetector 490/570 nm and the data were recorded for analysis.

Colony formation assay

PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were trypsinized, and the culture medium was completely suspended to prepare a cell suspension. The cells cultured in the 6-well plate, 1000 cells/well were inoculated for 8 days, medium was changed every 3 days, and cell status was observed. Cell clones were photographed under fluorescence microscope before the termination of the experiment, and the cells were washed with PBS. 1 mL 4% paraformaldehyde was added to each well, the cells were fixed for 50 min and washed with PBS. After that, GIEMSA dye solution was added to each well for 20 min, dried them, cell clones were then photographed for counting.

Apoptotic assay

PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were cultured with 6-well plates, 2 ml/well, digested with trypsin, and then the cell suspension was suspended, centrifuged at 1300 rmp for 5 min, and supernatant was discarded. Cell precipitate was washed with 4 °C pre-cooled D-Hanks (pH = 7.2–7.4). The cells were washed with 1 × binding buffer for precipitation, and centrifuged at 1300 rmp for 3 min to collect the cells. 200 μL 1 × binding buffer was added to suspend cell precipitation, followed by 10 μL Annexin V-APC staining at room temperature and dark for 15 min. Finally, 1 × binding buffer 500 μL was added and tested on machine.

Transwell assay

100 μL serum-free medium was added and placed in the incubator for 1–2 h. PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were digested with trypsin, and the cell suspension was prepared by resuspension with low serum medium. Carefully removed the medium from the small chamber and added 600 μL containing 30% FBS to the lower chamber. The cells were inoculated in 24 well plates 100,000 cells/well, 100 μL/well in inner chamber and 600 μL/well in outer chamber for 24 h. Place the chamber upside down on the blotting paper to remove the medium and gently remove the metastatic cells using a cotton swab. Added 400 μL stain to the hole in the 24-well plate and soak the chamber in the staining solution for 20 min, dyed the cells on the lower surface of the membrane to transfer the cells. Soaked the chamber in a large water cup and rinsed it in the air after washing it several times. Microscope photo membrane dissolved at 10% acetic acid, detection of absorbent 0D540.

Human apoptosis antibody array

The intracellular cell signaling pathway was examined using the Human Apoptosis Antibody Array Kit (# AB134001). All in all, the PANC-1 cells were collected after lentivirus infection for 3 days, washed with PBS, lysed with lysis buffer 2–8 °C for 30 min, and then gently shaken. The total extracted protein was diluted with the array diluent buffer kit to 0.5 mg/mL. Each array antibody membrane was blocked with blocking buffer for 30 min at room temperature, which incubated at 4 °C and gently shaken overnight. 1 × Biotin-conjugated Anti-cytokine was incubated overnight at 4 °C and gently shaken. HRP linked Streptavidin was added to the membranes. Protein was visualized using ChemiDoc XRS chemiluminescence detection and imaging system. The density of the spots was quantitated using Quantity One software and normalized to the α–tubulin levels.

Animal xenograft model

Animal research was approved by the ethics committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University conducted in accordance with guidelines and protocols for animal care and protection. BALB/c female nude mice (4 weeks old) were purchased from Shanghai Jiesijie Experimental Animals Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). PANC-1 cells with luciferase reporter tag infected with shMEX3A or shCtrl were subcutaneously injected into BALB female nude mice (5 × 106 cell per mouse). Data were collected (the weight and volume of the tumor) after 19 days of injection of PANC-1 cells, and then measured per week up to 45 days. Subsequently, D-luciferin (15 mg/mL) was injected into the mouse peritoneum at a dose of 10 μL/g, waiting for about 15 min, and then placing it in a dark room for bioluminescence imaging. The tumor load was evaluated weekly with bioluminescence imaging, and the IVIS spectral imaging system (emission wavelength 510 nm) analyzed. 10 min before in vivo imaging, anesthesia was performed by inhaling with 3% isoflurane. After 45 days, the mice were executed, injected with sodium pentobarbital, removed from the tumor and taken a photo, weighing.

Immunohistochemical staining

63 cases of survival-time PDA and matched normal adjacent cancer tissue were purchased from Shanghai Outdo Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The informed consents were collected from tissue donors (patients). Specimens were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE). Xylene were used for paraffin section dewaxing 15 min per time and 100% alcohol for hydration 10 min. After repairing and blocking of the citrate antigen, the sample and MEX3A antibody (1: 1000, Abcam, USA, # AB79046) were incubated overnight in an incubator at 4 °C. After elution with PBS for 5 times, secondary antibody IgG (1: 400, Abcam, USA, # AB6721) was added, incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and washed with PBS for 3 times. Tissue slices were first stained with DAB, and then with hematoxylin. Finally, images were taken under a microscope and evaluated according to the German immune response score [16]. In summary, the high or low expression level of MEX3A in PDA tissues is defined by the median based on total score of positive cells and total staining intensity.

Ki67 staining

Tumor tissue was sectioned from the sacrificed mice. After repairing and blocking of the citrate antigen, antibody Ki67 (1: 200, Abcam, USA, # AB16667) was added to the shMEX3A or shCtrl, respectively. After mixing, incubated overnight at 4 °C. PBS elution for several times, IgG (1: 400, Abcam, USA, # AB6721), secondary antibody was added and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. PBS was washed again. Tissue slices were first stained with DAB, and then with hematoxylin. Images were collected with a photomicroscope and analyzed.

Statistical analysis

The qRT-PCR was analyzed by 2 −∆∆CT method. T test were used to compare the difference. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The data are expressed as mean ± SD (n ≥ 3) and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Upregulation of MEX3A in PDA tissues

According to the Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining (Fig. 1a and Table 1), the expression of MEX3A in PDA tissues was significantly higher than that in normal tissues (P <0.001), which allowed the subsequent correlation analysis between MEX3A expression and clinicopathological data. Further, according to Mann–Whitney U analysis (Table 2), we revealed that there was a significant association between the expression of MEX3A and pathological grade. Moreover, the similar results were also displayed by Spearman rank correlation analysis (Table 3). Based on the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (Fig. 1b) we showed that the expression of MEX3A was significantly correlated with the overall survival of PDA patients. In conclusion, MEX3A might be associated with the development and prognosis of PDA.

Fig. 1
figure1

MEX3A is highly expressed in PDA and the construction of MEX3A knockdown cell model. a Expression levels of MEX3A in PDA tumor tissues and adjacent normal skin tissues were detected by IHC staining. b Kaplan–Meier survival analysis MEX3A expression and overall survival of PDA. c MEX3A expression in HPDE6-C7, BxPc-3, PANC-1 and SW1990 cells was detected by qRT-PCR. d qRT-PCR was used to screen knockdown efficiency of MEX3A in shMEX3A-1, shMEX3A-2, and shMEX3A-3 groups. e Infection efficiency for PANC-1 and SW1990 cells was evaluated by expression of green fluorescent protein 72 h post-infection. f, g The specificity and validity of the lentivirus-mediated shRNA knockdown of MEX3A expression was verified by qRT-PCR (f) and western blot analysis (g). The data were presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Table 1 Expression patterns in pancreatic cancer tissues and normal tissues revealed in immunohistochemistry analysis
Table 2 Relationship between MEX3A expression and tumor characteristics in patients with pancreatic cancer
Table 3 Relationship between MEX3A expression and tumor characteristics in patients with pancreatic cancer

Construction of MEX3A knockdown cells models

As shown in Fig. 1c, qRT-PCR indicated that the expression of MEX3A in cells BxPc-3, PANC-1, and SW1990 was relatively high compared to HPDE6-C7 cells (P < 0.05). Moreover, Fig. 1d showed that the shMEX3A-1 group has the highest knockdown efficiency of MEX3A, reaching 91.9% (P < 0.01) for downstream experiments. PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were infected with shMEX3A for silencing MEX3A, while that infected with shCtrl were used as negative control. Fluorescence imaging (Fig. 1e) was made 72 h after infection of PANC-1 and SW1990 with shMEX3A or shCtrl, and the results showed that the efficiency of cell infection reached over 80% and the cell state was normal. Results of qRT-PCR (Fig. 1f) displayed that the knockdown efficiencies of MEX3A in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were 43.8% and 80.5%, compared with the shCtrl groups, respectively. Western blot (Fig. 1g) results showed that the expression of MEX3A protein in the shMEX3A group was downregulated after lentivirus infection compared with the shCtrl group. Our data suggested that MEX3A knockdown cell models were successfully constructed.

Knockdown of MEX3A inhibited PDA cells proliferation and colony formation

Subsequently, MTT assay and colony formation assay were performed to detected cell proliferation and colony formation. First, MTT assay (Fig. 2a) suggested that the proliferation of the PANC-1 and SW1990 cells in the shMEX3A group decreased (P < 0.001). Colony formation capability is another character for malignant tumors. The effect of MEX3A knockdown on the colony formation of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were observed by Giemsa staining, which indicated that the number of colonies in the shMEX3A group was significantly less than that in the shCtrl group (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2b). These experimental results suggested that MEX3A may play an important role in the cell proliferation of PDA.

Fig. 2
figure2

Knockdown of MEX3A inhibits cell proliferation and migration, promotes apoptosis in PDA cells. a Cell proliferation of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells with or without knockdown of MEX3A was evaluated by MTT assay. b Colony formation was evaluated for PANC-1 and SW1990 cells with or without MEX3A knockdown. c Flow cytometry analysis based on Annexin V-APC staining was utilized to detect the percentage of early apoptotic cell for PANC-1 and SW1990 cells. d Cell migration of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells with or without knockdown of MEX3A was evaluated by Transwell assay. The data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Knockdown of MEX3A promoted PDA cells apoptosis

To further investigate the role of MEX3A in the development of PDA, flow cytometry was applied to evaluate the percentage of apoptotic cells among the cells infected with shMEX3A or shCtrl (indicated by Y-axis: the green fluorescence from GFP on lentivirus). Compared with shCtrl group, MEX3A downregulation significantly promoted the apoptosis of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells. The apoptosis rates in PANC-1 cells increased by 12.47%, while that in SW1990 cells increased by 24.45% (P< 0.001) (Fig. 2c). It is easy to conclude from our results that the downregulation of MEX3A significantly promotes the apoptosis of PDA in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells.

Knockdown of MEX3A inhibited PDA cells migration

In order to investigate the role of MEX3A in the metastasis of PDA, its effects on cell migration ability was measured by Transwell assay. The knockdown of MEX3A significantly inhibited cell migration in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells in comparison to the shCtrl groups. The migration rate of in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells increased by about 78% and 95%, respectively (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2d). These results lead to the conclusion that MEX3A promoted cell migration in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells of PDA.

Exploration of downstream molecular mechanism of MEX3A in PDA cells

For exploring the potential mechanism of the regulation ability of MEX3A knockdown in PDA, human apoptosis antibody array was performed to analyze the differential expression of 43 proteins in PANC-1 cells between shMEX3A and shCtrl groups. As shown in Fig. 3a–c, among the tested proteins, the expression levels of pro-apoptotic proteins including Caspase3, Caspase8 and TNF-α were significantly upregulated while the expression levels of protein Bcl-2, Bcl-w, HSP27, IGF-II, Survivin, sTNF-R1 and XIAP of anti-apoptotic proteins were significantly downregulated in shMEX3A group.

Fig. 3
figure3

Exploration of downstream molecular mechanism of MEX3A in PDA cells. a Human apoptosis antibody array analysis was performed in PANC-1 cells with or without MEX3A knockdown. b Differences in human apoptotic antibody array were analyzed in PANC-1 cells regardless of MEX3A knockdown. c Densitometry analysis was performed and the gray values of differentially expressed proteins were shown. d The expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) proteins were observed by western blot in PANC-1 and SW1990cells. e The expression of target protein pathway was observed by western blot in PANC-1. The data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Moreover, the expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) proteins were observed with western blot, such as N-cadherin, Vimentin and zinc finger-related transcription factor (Snail) and so on, to explore the mechanism of these proteins in the development of PDA. Western blot (Fig. 3d) showed that the expression of N-cadherin, Vimentin and Snail in the PANC-1 and SW1990 cells were downregulated in shMEX3A compared with the shCtrl group. In addition, compared with shCtrl, the expression of Akt, p-Akt, PIK3CA, and CDK6 were downregulated, while the expression level of MAPK9 was upregulated in MEX3A knockdown PANC-1 cells detected by western blot (Fig. 3e). These results were consistent with the aforementioned cellular experiments especially the cell apoptosis assay.

Knockdown of MEX3A in PDA cells impaired tumorigenesis in vivo

The above studies confirmed that downregulation of MEX3A could inhibit cell proliferation, migration and promote apoptosis in vitro. We still want to explore whether the knockdown of MEX3A has consistent results in vivo. Therefore, PANC-1 cells with or without MEX3A knockdown were subcutaneously injected into nude mice to establish mouse xenotransplantation model. The tumor volume in the shMEX3A group was obviously smaller than that in the shCtrl group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4a). The average weight of tumors in mice inoculated shMEX3A cells was 0.386 ± 0.118 g, which was significantly lower than that of the shCtrl group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4b, c). In addition, from the western blot results, compared with tumors of shCtrl group, the protein MEX3A expression of shMEX3A group tumor was downregulated (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure4

Knockdown of MEX3A inhibits tumor growth in mice xenograft models. a The volume of tumors in shCtrl group and shMEX3A group was measured after post-injection. b The average weight of tumors in shCtrl group and shMEX3A group. c Images of mice and tumors in shCtrl group and shMEX3A group. d Detection of MEX3A expression in tumors of mice models of shCtrl and shMEX3A groups by western blot. e The total bioluminescent intensity of tumors in shCtrl group and shMEX3A group. f The bioluminescence imaging of tumors in shCtrl group and shMEX3A group. g The Ki67 staining of tumor tissues in shCtrl group and shMEX3A group. The data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Additionally, bioluminescence imaging suggested that tumor growth in shMEX3A group was slower than that in shCtrl group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4e, f). The results of Ki67 staining showed that the proliferation index of tumor tissues in shMEX3A group was significantly lower than that in the shCtrl group (Fig. 4g). In summary, the results of in vivo experiments confirmed the correctness of the conclusions of in vitro experiments, indicating that MEX3A played a regulatory role and impaired tumorigenicity in PDA.

Discussion

MEX3A plays various roles in biological processes. Baumgart et al. pointed out that the expression of MEX3A is similar to that of mitotic markers of proliferating cell nuclear antigen [17]. To date, few studies have evaluated the effects of MEX3A on tumor cells. For example, MEX3A overexpression is associated with the recurrence of Wilms tumors [13]. In addition, Jiang et al. confirmed that abnormal activation of MEX3A in human gastric cancer cells promoted cell proliferation and migration [14].

Chiaravalli et al. suggested that a decrease in Mex3A expression may result in more pronounced inhibition of bladder cancer cell growth [18]. Interestingly, Adiseshaiah et al. found that MEX3A expression was not a poor prognostic factor for bladder urothelial carcinoma [19]. Importantly, MEX3A expression is involved in the regeneration of all intestinal epithelial cells with slow kinetics, helping to maintain cell renewal during chemotherapy and radiation therapy [20]. Based on this, we are urged to explore the regulation mechanism of MEX3A in PDA and provide feasible treatment strategies for PDA.

In this study, it was found that MEX3A is not only highly expressed in tumor tissues and human cultured cells of PDA, but also significantly correlated with patients’ prognosis. In addition, MEX3A knockdown inhibits PDA cell proliferation, migration, promotes apoptosis, and disrupts the cell cycle. Specifically, in vivo studies demonstrated that decreased tumorigenicity after knockdown of MEX3A, which is consistent with in vitro studies.

Escape from apoptosis is the basis of cancer pathogenesis [21]. Apoptosis involves a series of biochemical events, which are mediated by a variety of cellular signals. Moreover, MEX3A knockdown promotes PDA cell apoptosis through a series of apoptosis-related proteins, such as upregulating pro-apoptotic proteins, including Caspase3, Caspase8, and TNF-α; while downregulating anti-apoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2, Bcl-w, HSP27, IGF-II, Survivin, sTNF-R1 and XIAP. It has been known previously that binding of TNF to TNF-R1 initiates the Caspase activation pathway through the intermediate membrane protein TNF receptor-related death domain (TRADD) and death domain protein (FADD) [22]. The Bcl-2 family is a key regulator for supporting and resisting apoptosis, and perturbations may indicate cell-to-cell death or irreversibility [23]. Furthermore, Schafer et al. proposed that HSP27 is involved in the regulation of PDA apoptosis pathway [24]. Recently, Momeny et al. clarified that Cediranib inhibits the proliferation of PDAC cells by inhibiting the anti-apoptotic proteins Survivin and XIAP and induces apoptosis [25]. In view of the above, it can be presented that MEX3A knockdown to promote PDA cell apoptosis is a complex process of apoptotic protein regulation.

This study found that MEX3A knockdown inhibited PDA cell migration while down-regulating EMT markers such as N-cadherin, Snail and Vimentin. EMT is a developmental process in which cells acquire the ability to migrate [26]. EMT is essential for the vigorous movement of cells during embryogenesis, and tumor cells can reactivate the EMT program and increase their aggressiveness [26]. David et al. Point out that carcinogenicity associated with EMT is a feature that must be selected during cancer progression [27]. Momeny et al. found that cediranib can attenuate the migration and invasion of PDA cells by reducing the expression of EMT markers ZEB1, N-cadherin and Snail [25]. The vitamin D analog MART-10 inhibits metastatic potential by downregulating EMT in PDA cells [28]. Accordingly, it is possible to support PDA cell migration through EMT.

Furthermore, the knockdown of MEX3A affects various activities of PDA cells and involves the expression of downstream signal pathways Akt, p-Akt, PIK3CA, CDK6 and MAPK9. It has been reported that PI3K/Akt/NF-κB/mTOR is the main signal transduction axis that controls cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis and malignant transformation [29]. PIK3CA mutations can cause pancreatic tumorigenesis and can be targeted by PI3K inhibitors proposed by Payne et al. [30]. Deeb et al. demonstrated that inhibiting survival (anti-apoptosis) Akt/NF-κB/mTOR signal transduction affects PDA cell proliferation, cycle arrest and apoptosis [31]. In addition, Liu et al. proposed that anti-CDK4/6 treatment can induce EMT and enhance PDA cell invasion by activating SMAD-dependent TGF-b signaling [32]. Moreover, a large amount of evidence showed that MAPK9 signaling is related to lung cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, and ovarian cancer, mainly to adenocarcinoma cells [33]. From these reports, it is inferred that the occurrence of various activities of PDA cells is jointly regulated by a complex network system.

All in all, it was concluded that MEX3A was involved in the development and progression of PDA and that it could be potential prognosis indicator and therapeutic target. However, this study still has shortcomings. For example, the number of specimens included in this study is limited, and the underlying mechanism of MEX3A-mediated PDA regulation remains unclear. Therefore, in the future work, we will further deepen the understanding of the molecular mechanism of PDA related to MEX3A.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol. 2019;10(1):10–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gallmeier E, Gress TM. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Internist. 2018;59(8):805–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    McGuigan A, et al. Pancreatic cancer: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(43):4846–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Neesse A, et al. Stromal biology and therapy in pancreatic cancer: ready for clinical translation? Gut. 2019;68(1):159–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Marasini B, Sahu RP. Natural anti-cancer agents: implications in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer treatment. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2017;17(11):920–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Amrutkar M, Gladhaug IP. Pancreatic cancer chemoresistance to gemcitabine. Cancers. 2017;9(11):157.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    de SSousa Cavalcante L, Monteiro G. Gemcitabine: metabolism and molecular mechanisms of action, sensitivity and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;15(741):8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ohmoto A, Yachida S, Morizane C. Genomic features and clinical management of patients with hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and familial pancreatic cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(3):561.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rajabpour A, Rajaei F, Teimoori-Toolabi L. Molecular alterations contributing to pancreatic cancer chemoresistance. Pancreatology. 2017;17(2):310–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Buchet-Poyau K, Courchet J, Hir HL, et al. Identification and characterization of human Mex-3 proteins, a novel family of evolutionarily conserved RNA-binding proteins differentially localized to processing bodies. Nucleic acids Res. 2007;35(4):1289–300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Siomi H, Matunis MJ, Michael WM, et al. The pre-mRNA binding K protein contains a novel evolutionary conserved motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21(5):1193–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Krepischi AC, Maschietto M, Ferreira EN, et al. Genomic imbalances pinpoint potential oncogenes and tumor suppressors in Wilms tumors. Mol Cytogenet. 2016;9(1):20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yang C. Knockdown of hMex-3A by small RNA interference suppresses cell proliferation and migration in human gastric cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6(3):575–80.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chatterji P, Rustgi AK. RNA binding proteins in intestinal epithelial biology and colorectal cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2018;24(5):490–506.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jurmeister P, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of Bcl-2, nuclear S100A4, MITF and Ki67 for risk stratification of early-stage melanoma—a combined IHC score for melanoma risk stratification. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2019;17(8):800–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Baumgart M, Groth M, Priebe S, et al. RNA-seq of the aging brain in the short-lived fish N. furzeri—conserved pathways and novel genes associated with neurogenesis. Aging Cell. 2014;13(6):965–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Huang Y, et al. Identification of hMex-3A and its effect on human bladder cancer cell proliferation. Oncotarget. 2017;8(37):61215–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shi JW, Huang Y. Mex3a expression and survival analysis of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(33):54764–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Barriga FM, et al. Mex3a marks a slowly dividing subpopulation of Lgr5 + intestinal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(6):801–816 e7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang RA, et al. Apoptosis drives cancer cells proliferate and metastasize. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(1):205–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Weingartner M, et al. Endogenous membrane tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a potent amplifier of TNF receptor 1-mediated apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(38):34853–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Knight T, et al. A delicate balance—the BCL-2 family and its role in apoptosis, oncogenesis, and cancer therapeutics. Biochem Pharmacol. 2019;162:250–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Schafer C, et al. Heat shock protein 27 as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16(8):1776–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Momeny M, et al. Anti-tumor activity of cediranib, a pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Cell Oncol. 2019;43(1):81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Aiello NM, Kang Y. Context-dependent EMT programs in cancer metastasis. J Exp Med. 2019;216(5):1016–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    David CJ, Huang YH, Chen M, Su J, Zou Y, Bardeesy N, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Massagué J. TGF-β tumor suppression through a lethal EMT. Cell. 2016;164(5):1015–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chiang KC, Yeh CN, Hsu JT, et al. The vitamin D analog, MART-10, represses metastasis potential via downregulation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2014;354(2):235–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Polivka J Jr, Janku F. Molecular targets for cancer therapy in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;142(2):164–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Payne SN, Maher ME, Tran NH, et al. PIK3CA mutations can initiate pancreatic tumorigenesis and are targetable with PI3K inhibitors. Oncogenesis. 2015;4(10):e169.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Deeb D, Gao X, Liu Y, et al. The inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells by verrucarin A, a macrocyclic trichothecene, is associated with the inhibition of Akt/NF-кB/mTOR prosurvival signaling. Int J Oncol. 2016;49:1139–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liu F, Korc M. Cdk4/6 inhibition induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition and enhances invasiveness in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(10):2138–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gkouveris I, Nikitakis NG. Role of JNK signaling in oral cancer: a mini review. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(6):1010428317711659.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported in part by research Grants from the Key Research and Development Projects in Sichuan Province (2019YFS0043), Key Research Program Foundation of Science and Technology Commission of Sichuan Province (2017SZ0107), Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Research Project (2016C33208), the Post-Doctor Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2019HXBH044), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (2019M663519) and the 1·3·5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (ZY2017302-1.3.5).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y-HC and X-BL designed this program. XW and Y-QS operated the cell and animal experiments. Q-QT, C-LT, HZ, XW, J-HL and N-WK conducted the data collection and analysis. XW produced the manuscript which was checked by Y-HC and X-BL. All the authors have confirmed the submission of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong-Hua Chen or Xu-Bao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal research was approved by the ethics committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University conducted in accordance with guidelines and protocols for animal care and protection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Shan, Y., Tan, Q. et al. MEX3A knockdown inhibits the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int 20, 63 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-1146-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • PDA
  • MEX3A
  • Proliferation
  • Colony formation
  • Apoptosis
  • Migration