Skip to main content
Download PDF

Aberrant accumulation of NIK promotes tumor growth by dysregulating translation and post-translational modifications in breast cancer

Cancer Cell International volume 23, Article number: 57 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In vivo investigations with cancer cells have powerful tools to discover cancer progression mechanisms and preclinical candidate drugs. Among these in vivo experimental models, the establishment of highly malignancy cell lines with xenograft has been frequently used. However, few previous researches targeted malignancy-related genes whose protein levels translationally changed. Therefore, this study aimed to identify malignancy-related genes which contributed to cancer progression and changed at the protein level in the in vivo selected cancer cell lines.

Methods

We established the high malignancy breast cancer cell line (LM05) by orthotopic xenograft as an in vivo selection method. To explore the altered genes by translational or post-translational regulation, we analyzed the protein production by western blotting in the highly malignant breast cancer cell line. Functional analyses of the altered genes were performed by in vitro and in vivo experiments. To reveal the molecular mechanisms of the regulation with protein level, we evaluated post-translational modification by immunoprecipitation. In addition, we evaluated translational production by click reaction-based purification of nascent protein.

Results

As a result, NF-κB inducing kinase (NIK) increased at the protein level and promoted the nuclear localization of NF-κB2 (p52) and RelB in the highly malignant breast cancer cell line. The functional analyses indicated the NIK upregulation contributed to tumor malignancy via cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) attraction and partially anti-apoptotic activities. Additionally, the immunoprecipitation experiment revealed that the ubiquitination of NIK decreased in LM05 cells. The decline in NIK ubiquitination was attributed to the translational downregulation of cIAP1.

Conclusions

Our study identified a dysregulated mechanism of NIK production by the suppression of NIK post-modification and cIAP1 translation. The aberrant NIK accumulation promoted tumor growth in the highly malignant breast cancer cell line.

Background

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide [1]. Although breast cancer mortality has decreased for three decades since the 1990s, the decreasing trend in mortality has slowed in recent years [1, 2]. Breast cancer has been traditionally categorized into four molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) -enriched, and triple-negative) based on the expression of pathological marker proteins such as HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). In particular, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes approximately 10% ~ 20% of breast cancers and is characterized by defects in HER2, ER, and PR expression [3, 4]. TNBC presents a relatively poor prognosis, with metastases occurring more frequently than in other subtypes despite the limited molecular therapeutic targets [3, 5]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore innovative therapeutic targets by further elucidating the malignant mechanism of TNBC.

In normal cells, translational and post-translational modification tightly regulate signal transductions, while, in cancer cells, abnormalities in translational and post-translational modifications contribute to their malignancy [6, 7]. During the translation process, oncogenic signaling activation, such as through the mTOR and RAS-MAPK pathways, induces an enhancement in eIF4F complex expression and phosphorylation, thereby promoting global translation and contributing to cancer malignancy [6]. On the other hand, unusual tRNA modification and RNA conformations also contribute to cancer progression by promoting the translation of specific genes [8,9,10]. Post-translational modifications involve a large variety of mechanisms. For example, ubiquitination, one of the major post-translational modifications, has a large number of regulatory functions, including proteostasis, signaling complex assembly, chromatin remodeling, and protein secretion [7]. In particular, protein degradation by ubiquitination is essential for the regulation of signaling pathways, such as MAPK, NF-κB and PI3K-AKT-mTOR, which play important roles in cell growth and survival [7]. Disruption of ubiquitin-modifying machinery can lead to the malignant transformation of cancer and a variety of other diseases [7, 11]. To elucidate mechanisms of cancer malignancy, transcriptome analysis is frequently used, and the development of analysis at single-cell level has made it possible to conduct more detailed analysis [12]. However, it is also necessary to conduct analyses integrating transcriptome analysis, translational and post-translational modification evaluations at the protein level.

In vivo investigations with cancer cell line-derived models have contributed to the understanding of cancer biology and cancer hallmarks [13]. Animal models enable to analyze the functions of certain genes involved in cancer malignancy and the evaluation of the antitumor properties of preclinical candidate drugs. Among these models, xenograft models have been frequently utilized to assess tumor growth at particular organs and metastases to distant organs. Xenograft models are classified into two categories: orthotopic and ectopic. In particular, an orthotopic xenograft (OX) model, which mimics early cancer progression, is appropriate to comprehensively understand tumorigenesis and metastatic mechanisms. We previously established a cell line, LM05, with high tumor growth and lung-metastatic properties from a TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231 using an OX model [14]. Interestingly, this cell line showed a different expression profile from that of another lung-metastatic cell line, LM1-2–1, established by tail vein injection (TVI) that corresponds to an ectopic xenograft model [14, 15]. However, the molecular mechanisms of high tumor growth and lung-metastatic properties of LM05 cells remain unclear.

In this study, we comparatively analyzed western blot and microarray data of LM05 cells to discover their specific activating signals in comparison with parental MDA-MB-231 cells and LM1-2-1 cells. As a result, we identified that the nuclear localization of NF-κB2 (p52) and RelB, classified as non-canonical NF-κB pathway, was facilitated in LM05 cells via NIK upregulation at the protein level. The aberrant accumulation of NIK due to translational downregulation of cIAP1 promoted tumor growth via a cancer-inducing inflammatory response.

Methods

Cell culture

MDA-MB-231-mSlc7a1-luc2 (parental cells), LM05 and LM1-2-1 cells were established as previously described [14]. These cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan), 100 U/mL penicillin (Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Meiji-Seika Pharma) at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Plat-E packaging cells were kindly provided from T. Kitamura (Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo), and TIG-3 cells were kindly provided from Dr. B. Shiotani (National Cancer Center Research Institute). These cells were cultured in DMEM (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. MDA-MB-231 was purchased from the ATCC and these breast cancer cell lines were tested to verify the absence of Mycoplasma contamination when cells were prepared. These breast cancer cell lines were authenticated by genetic profiling using polymorphic short tandem repeat loci (Promega, WI, USA).

Western blotting

Western blotting was performed as previously described [16]. Cells were lysed in 1 × SDS sample buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% BPB, 10% glycerol) and then boiled at 95 °C for 5 min. To examine NIK protein level, cells were treated with 10 μM MG132 (Peptide Institute, Inc., Osaka, Japan) for 4 h. To assess cIAP1 protein stability, cells were treated with 10 µg/mL cycloheximide (CHX) (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation). In addition, hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES—KOH (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, Protease inhibitor cocktail, and 0.15 mM DTT) was used to fractionate nuclear lysates and cytoplasmic lysates. Then, 3 × SDS sample buffer was added to each lysate. The lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE using Mini-PROTEAN TGX gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., CA, USA) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). After blocking with Blocking One regent (NACALAI TESQUE, INC., Kyoto, Japan) for 1 h, these membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. Then, these membranes were washed with Tris Buffered Saline with Tween®20 (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) and anti-rabbit or mouse IgG HRP-linked antibody (cytiva, Tokyo, Japan) conjugated for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the target proteins were detected using ImmobilonTM Western (Millipore) and Fusion Solo7S (Vilber-Lourmat, Seine-et-Marne, France). To strip these antibodies, these membranes were immersed in boiled water for 5 min. The quantification of protein production was calculated by the intrinsic software of Fusion Solo7S. The quantitative data of post-translational modified protein was normalized by each amount of non-modified protein and control protein (α-tubulin) data. Information regarding the primary antibodies and secondary antibodies is described in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Protein stability analysis

To assess cIAP1 protein stability, cells were treated with 10 µg/mL cycloheximide (CHX) (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) for 4, 8 and 12 h. Following the method of western blotting, cIAP1 protein levels were normalized by the amount of control protein (α-tubulin) at each time point. Then, relative cIAP1 protein levels were calculated based on a non-treated sample (0 h).

Immunoprecipitation

Breast cancer cells were lysed in TNE buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 2 mM EDTA, 25 mM NaF, 17.5 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, Protease inhibitor cocktail). The protein concentrations of the cell lysates were measured by the BCA method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Then, each protein lysate (1 mg) was added to a NIK antibody (#4994, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA, 140 ng) or a rabbit IgG antibody (12–370, Millipore, 140 ng) and mixed with rotation overnight at 4 °C. After mixing, 20 µL of Protein A Sepharose 4 FF (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was added and mixed with rotation at 4 °C for 3 h. Subsequently, the supernatant was removed after centrifugation, and the Protein A Sepharose was washed five times with TNE Buffer. Finally, 1 × SDS sample buffer was added after removing the supernatant followed by heating at 95 °C for 5 min. This extract solution was used as the immunoprecipitation sample.

RNA extraction and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted by QIAzol (Qiagen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After purification of the total RNA, RNA was quantified and checked the quality by NanoDrop One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, ND-ONE-W). RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA by the SuperScript™ First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative PCR was performed with Thunderbird SYBR qPCR mix (TOYOBO CO., LTD., Osaka, Japan) and the StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). Quantification of the relative mRNA expression levels was performed by normalization to the level of β-actin RNA. The oligonucleotide sequences of the qRT-PCR primers are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Cell growth assay

Breast cancer cells (5×104 cells/well) were plated on the 12-well plates and incubated overnight. After incubation, each cell was washed once with D-PBS(-) and incubated for 5 minutes in 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Then the normal culture medium of RPMI-1640 was added to each well up to 1 mL. The cell number of each sample was calculated by loading the cell suspension medium into a hemocytometer.

Soft agar assay

RPMI culture medium containing 0.3% agarose (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) with LM05-shGFP or LM05-shNIK cells (4.0 × 104 cells/well) over a bottom layer of 0.6% agarose in RPMI culture medium were plated in each well of a 6-well plate and cultured for 3 weeks. Colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) for 1 h and stained with 0.005% crystal violet solution (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) for 30 min. After removing the overdyed region with Milli-Q water, the colony images were acquired with a digital camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and colony numbers were calculated with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, MD, USA).

Boyden chamber assay

LM05-shGFP or LM05-shNIK cells (1.5 × 104 cells/well) were plated on the lower chamber of 24-well plates and incubated overnight. The culture medium was replaced with Advanced RPMI-1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 1%(V/V) antibiotic–antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After incubation for 48 h, the upper chamber of 8 μm pore size transwell inserts (Corning, NY, USA), which were placed with TIG-3 cells (1 × 104 cells/well) in serum-free medium, was placed in the lower chamber. After incubation for 12 h, migrated cells at the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde–PBS and stained with 0.005% crystal violet solution. Then margin liquid and cells on the upper surface of the membrane were removed with a cotton swab. Images were acquired with a BZ-X700 microscope (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and analyzed using ImageJ software.

Co-culture assay by transwell

TIG-3 cells (5 × 103 cells/well) were plated on the lower chamber of 6-well plates and incubated overnight. After incubation, the upper chamber of 0.8 μm pore size transwell inserts (Corning), which were placed with LM05-shGFP or LM05-shNIK cells (1 × 104 cells/well), were placed in the lower chamber. After incubation for 7 days, TIG-3 cells at the lower chamber were lysed in 1 × SDS sample buffer and boiled at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by western blotting.

Immunofluorescence stain

Brest cancer cell lines and TIG-3 cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde–PBS for 15 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100-PBS (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) for 15 min. After blocking with Blocking One regent for 1 h, cells were incubated with primary antibodies against α-SMA (#19245, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:500), Vimentin (V2258, Sigma-Aldrich Co., MO, USA, 1:200), NF-κB2 (#05–361, Merck, Darmstadt, Deutschland, 1:100), RelB (#4922, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:100) at 4 °C overnight. Then, cells were incubated with Hoechst 33342 (H3570, Invitrogen, MA, USA) and the secondary antibody conjugated Alexa Fluor 488 and 594 (A11001, A21207, Invitrogen, 1:500) for 1 h in room temperature. Images were acquired with a BZ-X700 microscope.

Click reaction

Parental and LM05 cells were washed once with D-PBS(-) and incubated for 4 h in methionine-free RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich Co.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, GlutaMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 55 μg/mL L-cystine (Sigma-Aldrich Co.). Then, the media was replaced with media supplemented with 50 μmol/L L-homopropargyl glycine (HPG) (Cayman Chemical, MI, USA) for 24 h. To examine nascent NIK protein production, cells were treated with 50 μmol/L L-HPG and 10 μM MG132 for 4 h. After the treated cells were dissolved in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES—KOH (pH 7.3), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, Protease inhibitor cocktail), nascent HPG proteins and biotin-PEG3-azide (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Tokyo, Japan) were chemically reacted overnight using the Click-iT Protein Reaction Buffer Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 4 °C according to the manufacturer's protocol. After the click reaction, the biotinylated proteins were resuspended in TNE buffer, and Dynabeads™ M-280 Streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to the resuspended protein lysate. Then, the solution was incubated overnight at 4 °C using a rotary shaker. Streptavidin–biotin conjugates were washed five times with TNE buffer. After washing, the conjugates were resuspended in 1 × SDS sample buffer and eluted by boiling at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by western blotting.

Animal experiments

Animal experiments were performed in compliance with the guidelines of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute (experimental number: T18-009) and the Animal Committee of Waseda University (Accession Numbers: WD19-058, 2019-A068, WD20-005, 2020-A067, WD21-082, 2021-A074). The tumor size reached the limits defined in these approved animal protocols (specifically, expected tumor weight did not exceed 10% of the mouse body weight or if the mice presented with body condition indicative of weight loss of > 20% of their initial weight). Female NOD.CB-17-Prkdc-scid/J mice (NOD-SCID, 5–6 weeks old, Charles River Laboratories Japan, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan) were used for the orthotopic xenograft and tail vein injection models. The methods for establishing the xenograft metastasis model and tail vein injection model and the performance of bioluminescence imaging were previously described [14]. For orthotopic xenografts, a total of 1.0 × 106 cancer cells in 10 µl of D-PBS(-) were xenografted into the fourth fat pad of each mouse using a 28-gauge syringe (ITO CORPORATION, Shizuoka, Japan) after abdominal incision. These tumor volumes were calculated based on the formula of elliptical ball volume (V = 4/3 * π * A * B * C). A, B, and C are the lengths of all three semi-axes of the tumor. When the primary tumor volumes reached 300 mm3, they were resected under anesthesia with 2.5% isoflurane (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation). After the primary tumors were resected, mice were periodically monitored for metastasis formation using an in vivo imaging system (IVIS) -Lumina XRMS (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) for 2 weeks. For the tail vein injection model, a total of 5.0 × 105 cancer cells in 100 µl of D-PBS( −) were injected into the tail vein of each mouse using a 27-gauge needle. To monitor these xenograft mice, 200 µL of D-luciferin (15 mg/mL) (Gold Biotechnology, Inc., MO, USA) was injected intraperitoneally into each mouse, and bioluminescence imaging was performed with the IVIS every week. In addition, the bioluminescence of the lung metastatic tissue was measured ex vivo using the IVIS after intraperitoneal administration of 200 µL of D-luciferin to assess the metastatic potential of the cancer cells.

Histochemical analyses

The dissected primary tumors and lung metastasis tissues from the orthotopic mouse model were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde–PBS and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin-embedded human breast cancer cells with a breast tissue microarray (BC081116d and BC081116e, US Biomax, MD, USA) were baked for 2 h at 60 °C before proceeding with the following steps. The paraffin sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated in xylene (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation), a graded ethanol series (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) that decreased stepwise from 100 to 50%, and distilled water.

For immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis, antigen retrieval was performed in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) at 120 °C or 95 °C for 20 min. After cooling to room temperature, the endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% H2O2 (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) for 30 min. Then, these sections were incubated in 2.5% normal horse serum (Vector Laboratories, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The specimens were incubated with primary antibodies against α-SMA (A2547, Sigma-Aldrich Co., 1:100), Ki-67 (ab16667, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1:200), CAM5.2 (#349205, BD Bioscience, CA, USA, 1:1), NIK (HPA027269, Sigma-Aldrich Co., 1:50) and cIAP1 (ab108361, Abcam, 1:100) at 4 °C overnight. Then, the sections were incubated with the secondary antibody solutions and VECTASTAIN® ABC Reagent (Vector Laboratories) for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were stained with an ImmPACT® DAB EqV substrate kit (Vector Laboratories) followed by staining with hematoxylin (Polysciences Inc., PA, USA), dehydration and mounting. Images were acquired with a BZ-X700 microscope and analyzed using the image analysis application for BZ-X700 and ImageJ software.

For hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were stained in Mayer's hematoxylin solution (Muto Pure Chemicals Co., Tokyo, Japan) for 10 min. Then, the sections were soaked in 0.1% saturated lithium carbonate at 37 °C for 5 min. After washing in distilled H2O, the sections were stained with eosin solution (Muto Pure Chemicals Co.) for 10 min. Then, the sections were immediately washed with 100% ethanol, 90% ethanol and xylene. Finally, the sections were mounted, and images were acquired with a BZ-X700 microscope.

For terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining, deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were stained with a TUNEL Assay Kit (ab206386, Abcam) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. After staining with hematoxylin, dehydration and mounting, images were acquired with a BZ-X700 microscope.

RNA-seq analysis

Total RNA was extracted with QIAzol (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After purification of the total RNA, the quantity and quality of the RNA were evaluated with a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Agilent2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, CA, USA). cDNA libraries for RNA sequencing were established from total RNA using NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) to select poly-A mRNA followed by strand-specific library preparation using MGIEasy RNA Directional Library Prep Set V2.0 (MGITech Co. Shenzhen, China). Paired-end sequencing with a lead length of 150 bases was performed on a DNBSEQ-G400 (MGI tech) platform following the manufacturer’s instructions.

The raw sequence data (GSE182261: fastq files) were trimmed to remove adapter sequences by Trim-Galore (v0.6.4), and then, the trimmed read data were mapped on GRCh38/hg38 (GENCODE) using HISAT2 (v2.2.0). After the SAM files were converted to Bam files using SAMtool (v1.10), the gene expression FPKM was quantified by StringTie (v2.1.2). Then, read count matrices were generated for each gene by prepDE.py of StringTie. After removing low-expression genes with less than 10 counts per million (CPM), differentially expressed genes were identified using edgeR in R. Statistical cutoffs based on a p-value < 0.05 and a log fold change (Log2(FC)) ± 1 were used to filter differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between LM05-shGFP cells and LM05-shNIK cells. The z scores of these DEGs were calculated by gene filtering, and hierarchical clustering heatmaps were created using pheatmap in R (v3.6.2). For pathway analysis, the expression data were analyzed with gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp) and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA; https://digitalinsights.qiagen.com/products-overview/discovery-insights-portfolio/analysis-and-visualization/qiagen-ipa/).

Expression and knockdown vector constructs

NIK, cIAP1 and HA tag-fused ubiquitin (HA-UB) expression vectors were previously produced [17, 18]. The coding region of HA-UB was transferred to the pMXs vector using Ligation High (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). shNIK knockdown vectors were previously produced [19]. All cDNA and shRNA sequences were confirmed by sequencing. Cloning primers and target sequences of shRNA are described in Additional file 1: Table S3.

Retroviral packaging and infection

The production of the retrovirus using Plat-E cells was previously described [20]. Parent-shGFP, Parent-HA-UB, LM05-shNIK, LM05-shGFP, LM05-HA-UB, LM05-Venus, LM05-cIAP1 (human), and LM05-TAP-cIAP1 (murine) cells were established by retroviral infection of the pMXs-target gene cDNA-IRES-PuroR overexpression vectors, pMMLV-BIRC2-IRES-PuroR overexpression vectors (VB211123-1472ash, Kanagawa, VectorBuilder) or pSuper-target shRNA-Psv40-PuroR knockdown vectors (OligoEngine, WA, USA) and selected with 3 µg/ml puromycin (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation). LM05-NIK rescue cells were established by retroviral infection of pMXs-NIK-Psv40-NeoR overexpression vectors with LM05-shNIK no.2 cells and selected with 1 µg/ml G418 (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). Statistical results are presented as the mean ± SEM. Welch’s t-test and one-way or two-way ANOVA were employed for comparisons between two or three groups of data.

Results

The nuclear localization of NF-κB2 (p52) and RelB was facilitated in LM05 cells via NIK upregulation at the protein level.

We previously established two lung metastatic breast cancer cell lines (LM05 and LM1-2-1) [14]. LM05 cells were established from MDA-MB-231 cells (parental cells) by two cycles of the generation of OX and subsequent extraction from the lung metastatic tissue (Fig. 1A). LM1-2-1 cells were established from parental cells by two cycles of TVI and subsequent extraction from the lung metastatic tissue (Fig. 1A). The cell proliferation of LM05 decreased compared with the parental cells and LM1-2–1 cells (Fig. 1B). Oh the other hand, LM05 cells had a high potential for tumor growth in the fat pads compared with the parental cells and LM1-2–1 cells (Fig. 1C) [14]. In previous studies, transcriptome analysis of these highly malignant cell lines was performed as a conventional research strategy [21,22,23]. In this study, considering the importance of translational and post-translational modifications in cancer malignancy, we investigated proteins that changed in the amount and/or modification after the translation process by comparison between western blotting and the microarray expression data to discover the factors that enhanced tumor growth. We employed LM1-2–1 cells as the comparison subject to search for specific factors in LM05 cells. The analysis results showed that the gene expression related to EGFR-MAPK (EGFR, c-RAF, MEK1/2, ERK1/2), AKT-mTOR (AKT, mTOR, GSK3B, S6K1), JAK-STAT (JAK2, STAT1/3) and, other pathways (JNK, NOTCH, CREB and so on) did not markedly change (|Log2(FC)|> 1) (Fig. 1D, Additional file 1: Table S4, S5, Additional file 2: Fig. S1). The protein production and post-translational modification did not markedly change, although the protein level of NF-κB2 (p52) increased (Log2(FC) > 1) (Fig. 1E, Additional file 1: Table S6). One of the NF-κB signaling activation markers is the nuclear translocation of the NF-κB family of proteins: p105/p50 (NF-κB1), p100/p52 (NF-κB2), RelA (p65), and RelB [24, 25]. Therefore, we investigated the nuclear translocation of the NF-κB family proteins by western blotting to evaluate the activity of NF-κB signaling in LM05 cells. Signaling analysis revealed that p50 and RelA in the nuclear fraction was unchanged in LM05 cells (Fig. 1F). On the other hand, NF-κB2 (p52) and RelB increased in nuclear of LM05 cells compared with the parental cells and LM1-2–1 cells (Fig. 1F, Additional file 2: Fig. S2). The nuclear translocation of p52 and RelB is attributed to the partial degradation of p100 to p52 [26, 27]. Since p52 and RelB are classified as part of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, we examined the amounts of NF-kappa-β-inducing kinase (NIK), a key regulator of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway [28]. NIK is rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin–proteasome system after being ubiquitinated with the TRAF2-TRAF3-cIAP1/2 complex [29, 30]. Therefore, we investigated the amounts of NIK protein in the presence of a proteasome inhibitor, MG132. As a result, NIK increased at the protein level even though NIK mRNA expression did not significantly change in LM05 cells (Fig. 1G). These results indicated that nuclear localization of NF-κB2 (p52) and RelB was facilitated in LM05 cells via NIK upregulation at the protein level.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The nuclear localization of NF-κB2 (p52) and RelB was facilitated in LM05 cells via NIK upregulation at the protein level. A Schematic representation of the in vivo selection process using an orthotopic xenograft (OX) and tail vein injection (TVI). Luciferase-expressing MDA-MB-231 (parental cells) cells were transplanted into NOD-SCID mice by OX or TVI. Subsequently, lung metastatic cells were collected and established from lung tissue with metastases. These cells were reinjected into NOD-SCID mice using the same xenograft model to concentrate these cells with higher lung metastatic activity. B Cell growth curves of Parent, LM05 and LM1-2-1 cell lines on planar culture (n = 3, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test). C Representative tumor growth curves (lower, n = 4 per group, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) of NOD-SCID mice orthotopically injected with parental, LM05 or LM1-2-1 cells at 0 week and 5 weeks. D Integrative signaling analysis of LM05 and LM1-2-1 cells was analyzed by microarray expression data. The microarray expression results were shown as a heatmap of the log2-fold change in each cell compared with the parental cells. E. Representative primary blots and heatmap of integrative signaling analysis by western blotting. The protein production data of western blotting were shown as a heatmap of the log2-fold change in each cell compared with the parental cells. F Western blotting analysis of NF-κB1 (p50), NF-κB2 (p100/52), RelA, RelB, α-Tubulin and Histone H3 in whole cells and the nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts of the parental, LM05, and LM1-2-1 cells. G Western blotting (upper) and qRT-PCR (lower, n = 3, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) results of NIK protein and mRNA in the parental, LM05, and LM1-2-1 cells. For western blotting, all cell lines were either untreated or treated with MG132 (10 μM for 4 h). All data are representative of three independent experiments and are shown as the mean ± SEM. n.s. not significant. * P < 0.05

Full size image

NIK upregulation was induced by the suppression of nascent cIAP1 protein production

NIK is constantly degraded in the normal state by the TRAF2-TRAF3-cIAP1/2 complex in the ubiquitin–proteasome system [29, 30]. We examined the ubiquitination of NIK by immunoprecipitation with a NIK antibody. Ubiquitination of NIK decreased in LM05 cells compared with parental cells (Fig. 2A). Nest, we examined the amounts of TRAF2, TRAF3 and cIAP1/2 protein, which acts as degradation of NIK [29, 30]. From this result, the protein production of TRAF2 and 3 did not differ between parent, LM05 and LM1-2–1 cells (Fig. 2B). Although cIAP1 mRNA expression was unchanged compared to the parental and LM05 cells, western blotting analysis showed that cIAP1 decreased at the protein level (Fig. 2B). In addition, NIK upregulation in LM05 cells was suppressed by cIAP1 overexpression (Additional file 2: Fig. S3A). In the parent cell line, NIK production increased by cIAP1 knockdown (Additional file 2: Fig. S3B). Next, we evaluated the protein stability of cIAP1 by cycloheximide chase analysis to elucidate the downregulation mechanism of cIAP1. These results demonstrated that the cIAP1 reduction at the protein level was not ascribed to protein degradation in LM05 cells (Fig. 2C). In previous studies, it is established that nascent cIAP1 production was occasionally regulated by translational mechanisms [31,32,33]. Hence, we evaluated the production of the nascent cIAP1 protein pulse-labeled with L-homopropargylglycine (HPG) as a methionine analog conjugated to a biotin tag using a click reaction. The results showed that HPG-labeled cIAP1 protein production decreased in LM05 cells compared with parental cells (Fig. 2D). Furthermore, we also evaluated that the production of nascent NIK protein using the click reaction. This result displayed that the synthesis of nascent NIK protein did not differ between parent and LM05 cells (Additional file 2: Fig. S3C). All of these results suggested that the translational downregulation of cIAP1 caused post-translational stabilization of NIK in LM05 cells.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Downregulation of cIAP1 translation caused the upregulation of NIK protein. A Western blotting analysis of ubiquitinated NIK in HA-tagged ubiquitin (HA-UB)-expressing parental or LM05 cells after treatment with 10 μM MG132 for 4 h. The protein lysates of HA-UB expressed in parental or LM05 cells were immunoprecipitated with an anti-NIK antibody and then immunoblotted with an anti-HA antibody. B Representative western blotting (upper) of cIAP1, 2, TRAF2 and 3 in parental, LM05 and LM1-2–1 cells. qRT-PCR (lower, n = 3, Welch’s t-test) analysis of cIAP1 expression in parental and LM05 cells. C Assessment of cIAP1 protein stability in parental and LM05 cells treated with 10 µg/mL cycloheximide (CHX). Quantification of cIAP1 protein level normalized by α-Tubulin protein level in each time point (n = 3, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test). D. Assessment of nascent cIAP1 protein levels in parental and LM05 cells using a click reaction. Parental and LM05 cells were treated with 50 μM L-homopropargyl glycine (HPG) for 24 h. The nascent proteins labeled with HPG were conjugated to biotin using a click reaction. The biotinylated proteins were purified with streptavidin beads and subjected to western blotting. All data are representative of three independent experiments and are shown as the mean ± SEM. n.s. not significant

Full size image

Upregulation of NIK contributed to tumor growth in LM05 cells

To determine the contribution of NIK to cancer malignancy, we established NIK knockdown cells of LM05. NIK knockdown cells depressed NIK expression and nuclear localization of p52 and RelB (Additional file 2: Fig. S4A, B). We evaluated cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth with a soft agar assay. NIK expression did not affect cell growth in planar culture (Fig. 3A), although the colony formation activity was decreased by NIK knockdown (Fig. 3B). Next, we investigated whether NIK upregulation contributes to the inherent high tumor growth and lung metastatic potential of LM05 cells, NIK knockdown cells were orthotopically injected into the mammary fat pads of NOD-SCID mice. NIK knockdown in LM05 cells significantly decreased the primary tumor weights and volumes (Fig. 3C and D). The reduction in tumor growth caused by NIK knockdown was partially rescued by recovering the ectopic expression of NIK (Additional file 2: Fig. S5A, B and C). In addition, we examined the effects of NIK knockdown on lung metastatic potential by performing a metastasis assay in an orthotopic xenograft model. To remove the inhibitory effects of tumor growth caused by NIK knockdown, we uniformly resected the primary tumors after they reached a size of 300 mm3. Under these conditions, NIK knockdown did not affect the potential of LM05 cells to form lung metastasis (Fig. 3E). IHC analysis of lung metastases using an anti-CAM5.2 antibody, a human-specific cytokeratin, indicated that no differences in the metastatic node areas between the control and NIK knockdown groups (Fig. 3F). These results suggested that NIK upregulation facilitated the inherent tumor growth but not the lung metastatic potential of LM05 cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

NIK upregulation facilitated inherent tumor growth but not the lung metastatic potential of LM05 cells. A Cell growth curves of LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1 and shNIK no.2 cells on planar culture (n = 3, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test). B Representative images (upper) and quantification data (lower) (n = 5, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) of the soft agar colony formation assay in LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1 and shNIK no.2 cells. The scale bar is 5 mm. C Representative images of primary tumors (upper) and quantification data of the primary tumor weights (lower) (n = 4, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) in LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1 and shNIK no.2 cells. The scale bar is 1 cm. D Representative in vivo bioluminescent images of LM05-shGFP and shNIK no.2 cells (upper). Tumor growth curves (lower) (n = 6 per group, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) of NOD-SCID mice orthotopically injected with LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1 and shNIK no.2 cells. E Representative ex vivo bioluminescent images (upper) and quantification data of the lung metastasis tissue (lower) (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) derived from NOD-SCID mice orthotopically injected with LM05-shGFP (n = 5), shNIK no.1 (n = 4) and shNIK no.2 cells (n = 5). F Representative HE and IHC staining images (upper) and quantification data (lower) (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) of NIK protein production in lung metastasis tissue derived from NOD-SCID mice orthotopically injected with LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1 and shNIK no.2 cells. The average CAM5.2-positive percentages were calculated from 5 fields of view from n = 4 individual lung metastasis slides. The scale bar is 100 μm. G Representative HE and IHC staining images (upper) and quantification data (lower) (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) from the TUNEL assay and α-SMA protein production in primary tumor tissues derived from NOD-SCID mice orthotopically injected with LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1 and shNIK no.2 cells. The average number of TUNEL- and α-SMA-positive cells were calculated from 5 fields of view from n = 4 individual primary tumor slides. The scale bar is 100 μm. H Representative images (upper) and quantification data (lower) (n = 5, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) of the Boyden chamber assay with TIG-3 cells that were co-cultured with LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1, and shNIK no.2 cells. The scale bar is 500 μm. I Western blotting (upper) and immunofluorescence staining (lower) of α-SMA expression in TIG-3 cells that were co-cultured with LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1 and shNIK no.2 cells or no cells (NC). The scale bar is 50 μm. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM. n.s. not significant. * P < 0.05

Full size image

Next, we performed immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of the primary tumor to investigate the role of NIK in the primary tumor. The probability of Ki67 positive cells (proliferation marker) didn’t change between the primary tumor of LM05-shGFP and LM05-shNIK (Fig. 3G). On the other hand, the number of TUNEL-positive regions (apoptosis marker) tended to increase in the primary tumor after NIK knockdown (Fig. 3G). The α-SMA-positive region (a cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) marker) decreased in the primary tumors after NIK knockdown (Fig. 3G). Therefore, we utilized a co-culture system in a Boyden chamber to investigate the effects of NIK on the human fibroblast cell line TIG-3. Our results revealed that NIK knockdown suppressed the attraction of TIG-3 cells to the cancer cells in the co-culture system (Fig. 3H). On the other hand, α-SMA protein in TIG-3 cells did not change when co-cultured with control and NIK knockdown cells (Fig. 3I), indicating that NIK was involved in the attraction of fibroblasts but did not induce their activation to CAFs. These results suggest that the suppression of tumor growth caused by NIK knockdown is due to increased apoptosis of the tumor cells at least in part and decreased induction of CAFs.

NIK knockdown suppressed cancer-inducing inflammatory signaling

To determine the NIK-related pathway and genes that contribute to the phenotypes altered by NIK knockdown (Fig. 3B, C, D, G and H), we performed transcriptome analysis by RNA-seq. We extracted the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between LM05-shGFP cells and LM05-shNIK cells using the following criteria: FDR < 0.05 (Benjamini–Hochberg method) and log fold change |(Log2(FC))|> 1 (Fig. 4A, Additional file 1: Table S7). To determine the NIK-related pathways, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA). GSEA using the MSigDB Hallmark gene set collection revealed that these downregulated genes with NIK knockdown were significantly enriched for pathways related to inflammation, interferon response, and TNFα signaling via NF-κB (Fig. 4B, Additional file 1: Table S8). Similarly, pathways related to the interferon response and TNF secretion were suppressed in NIK knockdown cells using Gene Ontology gene sets (Additional file 1: Table S9). Indeed, NIK knockdown decreased the expression of IL6 and CXCL1, which are important for the attraction of fibroblasts (Fig. 4C) [34, 35]. BIRC3 expression, which contributes to apoptosis resistance, markedly decreased by NIK knockdown (Fig. 4C) [36, 37]. These results suggested that NIK knockdown caused the reduction in anti-apoptotic gene expression and fibroblast-attracted cytokines and chemokines, inherently resulting in decreased tumor growth.

Fig. 4
figure 4

NIK regulated cancer-inducing inflammatory signaling in LM05 cells. A Heatmap of the DEGs from the LM05-shGFP, LM05-shNIK no.1 and LM05-shNIK no.2 RNA-seq data, each performed in duplicate. Hierarchical analysis of the heatmap was performed by the complete linkage method. B GSEA enrichment plot of the hallmark gene sets for the differentially expressed genes in LM05-shNIK cells compared with LM05-shGFP cells. C Validation of NIK signature gene expression related to tumor inflammation using qRT-PCR (lower) (n = 3, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test) in LM05-shGFP, shNIK no.1 and shNIK no.2 cells. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM. n.s. not significant. * P < 0.05

Full size image

NIK protein production increased in malignant breast cancer tissue

We investigated the relationship between NIK production and breast cancer malignancy in clinical samples. We characterized NIK production by IHC staining in a tissue microarray from breast cancer patients (Fig. 5A). Firstly, we could also observe the difference in NIK protein production between control and NIK knockdown xenograft tumor tissues using the NIK antibody (Additional file 2: Fig. S6A). IHC analysis showed that NIK protein production significantly increased in stage I-III patients compared with normal breast tissues (Fig. 5B, Additional file 1: Table S10). NIK protein production did not correlate with the expression scores of breast cancer marker genes such as ER, PR, and HER2 (Additional file 2: Fig. S7A, B and C). From these results, NIK has the potential to be used as a diagnostic marker across other breast cancer subtypes. On the other hand, the cIAP1 protein production slightly increased in these tumor tissues, but the cIAP1 protein level didn’t differ statistically between normal and tumor tissue (Additional file 2: Fig. S8). We investigated the correlation of NIK and cIAP1 protein production in clinical breast cancer tissues of consecutive cuts. In NIK or cIAP1 expression tissues (each positive percentage > 10%), no significant negative correlation between NIK and cIAP1 protein production was observed in clinical breast cancer tissues (Fig. 5C, D). However, it is notable that 72% of tissues exhibited the NIKhigh/cIAP1low or NIKlow/cIAP1high pattern (NIK + percentage > 10% and cIAP1 + percentage < 10%, or NIK + percentage < 10% and cIAP1 + percentage > 10%) (Fig. 5C, Additional file 1: Table S11). Therefore, the reduction of cIAP1 contributed to the NIK upregulation in a subset of primary human breast cancer tissues.

Fig. 5
figure 5

NIK protein production increased in malignant breast cancer tissue. A Representative IHC staining images of NIK protein production in normal breast tissue and breast tumors. The scale bar is 500 μm. B Quantification data of the NIK IHC staining images in normal breast tissue and breast tumors ((n = 10 normal, n = 6 stage I, n = 72 stage II, and n = 22 stage III); one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test). C Representative IHC staining images of NIK and cIAP1 protein production in normal breast tissue and breast tumors of consecutive cuts. The scale bar of the low-power field is 1 mm and the scale bar of the high-power field is 100 μm. D Representative scatter plot of NIK and cIAP1 positive percentage in IHC stain tissue. The p-value and equation were calculated by Linear regulation analysis (n = 55). E The graphical summary indicates that the abnormal accumulation of NIK, due to reduced translation of cIAP1, enhances tumor growth by promoting an inflammatory cancer microenvironment. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM. n.s. not significant. * P < 0.05

Full size image

Discussion

NIK expression increased in the several breast cancer cell lines and multiple myeloma cell lines [38,39,40]. In breast cancer, basal-like subtype cell lines have shown increased NIK mRNA expression by epigenetic dysregulation of the NIK gene [40, 41]. Certain multiple myeloma cell lines have genetic defects in TRAF2/3 and cIAP1/2 [38, 39], which degrade NIK protein. This study indicated that the reduction of translation of cIAP1 increased the amount of NIK protein. This was a novel cause of the aberrant accumulation of NIK in the breast cancer cell line (Fig. 5E).

The activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway by NIK upregulation contributes to the enhancement of cell proliferation and maintenance of cancer stemness properties via the NOTCH pathway, especially in basal-like breast cancer cell lines [19, 40]. Although claudin-low cell lines exhibit high levels of NF-κB activation with increased NIK mRNA expression [40, 41], the function of NIK in tumor malignancy and metastasis has not been sufficiently investigated. Our results suggested that NIK upregulation contributed to tumor growth by attracting CAFs and partial anti-apoptosis potency through regulation of the expression of genes related to inflammatory responses in LM05 cells, which is classified as the claudin-low subtype (Fig. 5E). Therefore, our present study proposed that there were novel function and aberrant accumulation mechanism of NIK in breast cancer that differs from the conventional research.

From our results, a reason for the reduction of tumor growth by NIK knockdown was the expansion of the apoptotic area in the primary tumor. CAFs contribute to the enhancement of tumor growth by promoting the antiapoptotic potential and chemoresistance of cancer cells [42, 43]. It was possible that NIK knockdown suppressed CAFs production, leading to the decline in the antiapoptotic potency in tumors. CAFs secreted CXCL12/SDF-1, which contributes to tumor growth and anti-apoptosis in cancer cells via CXCR4 [44, 45]. Indeed, the expression of CXCR4 decreased in NIK knockdown cells. Thus, it is possible that the positive feedback through this paracrine mechanism is repressed by NIK knockdown. Therefore, these data suggested that NIK plays an important role in the interaction with stromal cells in the cancer microenvironment.

NIK is crucial for the maintenance of various tissue functions, including the immune system, bone formation, the kidneys, the liver, glucose homeostasis and hematopoiesis [46]. Then, abnormal NIK activation has been implicated in a variety of autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, acute kidney injury and cancer [46]. Recently, exploratory studies of NIK inhibitors have expanded [46]. Owing to NIK crystallographic data, novel NIK inhibitors have been developed based on structure–activity relationships and docking simulations [47, 48]. These studies have demonstrated that NIK inhibitors are therapeutically effective in certain mouse models of inflammatory hepatic diseases and systemic lupus erythematosus [49, 50]. As another example, mangiferin, which is a natural compound with NIK inhibitory activity, has been reported to suppress tumor growth and metastatic potential in melanoma cell lines [51]. However, the efficacy of these NIK inhibitors against other types of cancer is limited; thus, it would be necessary to investigate their potential broadly. In contrast, inactivating NIK mutations have been shown to cause immunodeficiencies, such as decreased numbers of mature B cells and T cells and their functional impairment [52]. NIK plays an important role in antitumor immunity by regulating metabolism in cytotoxic CD8+ T cells [53]. Therefore, NIK inhibitors need to be developed with a better molecular understanding so as not to interfere with their homeostatic role in the body.

Our experimental results indicated that NIK knockdown critically affected tumor growth rather than the potential to form lung metastases in LM05 cells. From this result, we hypothesized that NIK may play an important role in tumor growth at the mammary gland. To address this hypothesis, we evaluated the proliferative potential of parental and LM05 cells in lung tissue via tail vein injection. The results showed that no significant difference in the proliferative potential of the lung tissues between the parental and LM05 cells (Additional file 2: Fig. S9). LM05 cells were repeatedly xenografted into the mammary gland and grown at this site. Indeed, TWEAK and RANKL, ligands of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, are expressed and have important functions in mammary gland development and tumor malignancy [54,55,56,57]. In short, LM05 cells may be more susceptible to the accumulation of NIK proteins by these ligands in breast tissue. Meanwhile, we did not identify the genes that contribute to the enhanced potential of LM05 cells to metastasize to the lungs. For this issue, we attempted to extract a group of genes that upregulated in LM05 cells compared to the parental strain but not downregulated after NIK knockdown. The group included known lung metastasis regulatory genes such as IL13RA2, TNS1, and EMP1 [22, 58, 59] (Additional file 2: Fig. S10). Further studies of those genes may reveal the molecular mechanism of NIK-independent metastasis enhancement in LM05 cells.

This present study has limitations. The IHC experimental result of NIK and cIAP1 suggested that the reduction of cIAP1 and other bioprocesses might contribute to the NIK upregulation in human breast cancer tissue. We conjectured that the downregulation of TRAF2 and TRAF3 may contribute to NIK upregulation as other bioprocesses. In previous research, TRAF2 and TRAF3 are also the degradation factor of NIK protein [29, 30] and these proteins are frequently deleted and inactive mutated in several cancer types [60]. Hence, further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of NIK upregulation in clinical breast cancer tissue.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results demonstrated a novel role and the attribution of NIK upregulation in a high malignancy breast cancer cell line. In addition, the amount of NIK protein increased in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues; thus, NIK has the potential to be a diagnostic marker of breast cancer. Elucidating the functions and regulatory mechanisms of NIK can lead to a deeper understanding of NIK as a potential biomarker or therapeutic target in breast cancer.

Availability of data and materials

RNA-seq data were submitted to the NCBI GEO database under accession number GSE182261. The microarray expression data of the breast cancer cells that can generate lung metastases were obtained from our previous research [14]. These expression data and other supporting data of this research are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NF-κB:

Nuclear Factor-Kappa B

NIK:

NF-kappa-β-Inducing Kinase

cIAP1:

Cellular Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein 1

TNBC:

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

OX:

Orthotopic Xenograft

TVI:

Tail Vein Injection

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu H, Shi W, Jin Z, Zhuo R, Dong J, Lao Q, Li S, Pang W. Global, regional, and national mortality trends of female breast cancer by risk factor, 1990–2017. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1938–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Acheampong T, Kehm RD, Terry MB, Argov EL, Tehranifar P. Incidence trends of breast cancer molecular subtypes by age and race/ethnicity in the US from 2010 to 2016. JAMA Netw open. 2020;3: e2013226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4429–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Micalizzi DS, Ebright RY, Haber DA, Maheswaran S. Translational regulation of cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2021;81:517–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Senft D, Qi J, Ronai ZA. Ubiquitin ligases in oncogenic transformation and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:69–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Phung B, Cieśla M, Sanna A, Guzzi N, Beneventi G, Cao Thi Ngoc P, Lauss M, Cabrita R, Cordero E, Bosch A, Rosengren F, Häkkinen J, Griewank K, Paschen A, Harbst K, Olsson H, Ingvar C, Carneiro A, Tsao H, Schadendorf D, Pietras K, Bellodi C, Jönsson G. The X-Linked DDX3X RNA helicase dictates translation reprogramming and metastasis in melanoma. Cell Rep. 2019;27:3573-3586.e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodarzi H, Nguyen HCB, Zhang S, Dill BD, Molina H, Tavazoie SF. Modulated expression of specific tRNAs drives gene expression and cancer progression. Cell. 2016;165:1416–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rapino F, Delaunay S, Rambow F, Zhou Z, Tharun L, De Tullio P, Sin O, Shostak K, Schmitz S, Piepers J, Ghesquière B, Karim L, Charloteaux B, Jamart D, Florin A, Lambert C, Rorive A, Jerusalem G, Leucci E, Dewaele M, Vooijs M, Leidel SA, Georges M, Voz M, Peers B, Büttner R, Marine J-C, Chariot A, Close P. Codon-specific translation reprogramming promotes resistance to targeted therapy. Nature. 2018;558:605–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Popovic D, Vucic D, Dikic I. Ubiquitination in disease pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Med. 2014;20:1242–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan J, Slowikowski K, Zhang F. Single-cell transcriptomics in cancer: computational challenges and opportunities. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:1452–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gengenbacher N, Singhal M, Augustin HG. Preclinical mouse solid tumour models: status quo, challenges and perspectives. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:751–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakayama J, Ito E, Fujimoto J, Watanabe S, Semba K. Comparative analysis of gene regulatory networks of highly metastatic breast cancer cells established by orthotopic transplantation and intra-circulation injection. Int J Oncol. 2017;50:497–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakayama J, Han Y, Kuroiwa Y, Azuma K, Yamamoto Y, Semba K. The in vivo selection method in breast cancer metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuroiwa Y, Nakayama J, Adachi C, Inoue T, Watanabe S, Semba K. Proliferative classification of intracranially injected HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines. Cancers. 2020;12:1811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishina T, Yamaguchi N, Gohda J, Semba K, Inoue J. NIK is involved in constitutive activation of the alternative NF-κB pathway and proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;388:96–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamaguchi N, Yokota M, Taguchi Y, Gohda J, Inoue J. cIAP1/2 negatively regulate RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis through the inhibition of NFATc1 expression. Genes Cells. 2012;17:971–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto M, Taguchi Y, Ito-Kureha T, Semba K, Yamaguchi N, Inoue JI. NF-κB non-cell-autonomously regulates cancer stem cell populations in the basal-like breast cancer subtype. Nat Commun. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saito M, Kato Y, Ito E, Fujimoto J, Ishikawa K, Doi A, Kumazawa K, Matsui A, Takebe S, Ishida T, Azuma S, Mochizuki H, Kawamura Y, Yanagisawa Y, Honma R, Imai J, Ohbayashi H, Goshima N, Semba K, Watanabe S. Expression screening of 17q12-21 amplicon reveals GRB7 as an ERBB2-dependent oncogene. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:1708–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang Y, Siegel PM, Shu W, Drobnjak M, Kakonen SM, Cordón-Cardo C, Guise TA, Massagué J. A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:537–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Minn AJ, Gupta GP, Siegel PM, Bos PD, Shu W, Giri DD, Viale A, Olshen AB, Gerald WL, Massagué J. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature. 2005;436:518–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bos PD, Zhang XHF, Nadal C, Shu W, Gomis RR, Nguyen DX, Minn AJ, van de Vijver MJ, Gerald WL, Foekens JA, Massagué J. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Nature. 2009;459:1005–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoesel B, Schmid JA. The complexity of NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Huxford T, Ghosh G. A structural guide to proteins of the NF-kappaB signaling module. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Solan NJ, Miyoshi H, Carmona EM, Bren GD, Paya CV. RelB cellular regulation and transcriptional activity are regulated by p100. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:1405–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Derudder E, Dejardin E, Pritchard LL, Green DR, Körner M, Baud V. RelB/p50 dimers are differentially regulated by tumor necrosis factor-α and lymphotoxin-β receptor activation. Critical roles for p100. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:23278–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun S-C. Non-canonical NF-κB signaling pathway. Cell Res. 2011;21:71–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zarnegar BJ, Wang Y, Mahoney DJ, Dempsey PW, Cheung HH, He J, Shiba T, Yang X, Yeh W, Mak TW, Korneluk RG, Cheng G. Noncanonical NF-κB activation requires coordinated assembly of a regulatory complex of the adaptors cIAP1, cIAP2, TRAF2 and TRAF3 and the kinase NIK. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1371–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Morrison MD, Reiley W, Zhang M, Sun S-C. An Atypical tumor necrosis factor (TNF) Receptor-associated factor-binding motif of B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF family (BAFF) receptor mediates induction of the noncanonical NF-κB signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:10018–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Eden ME, Byrd MP, Sherrill KW, Lloyd RE. Translation of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (c-IAP1) mRNA is IRES mediated and regulated during cell stress. RNA. 2004;10:469–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Graber TE, Baird SD, Kao PN, Mathews MB, Holcik M. NF45 functions as an IRES trans-acting factor that is required for translation of cIAP1 during the unfolded protein response. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:719–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Faye MD, Beug ST, Graber TE, Earl N, Xiang X, Wild B, Langlois S, Michaud J, Cowan KN, Korneluk RG, Holcik M. IGF2BP1 controls cell death and drug resistance in rhabdomyosarcomas by regulating translation of cIAP1. Oncogene. 2015;34:1532–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hendrayani SF, Al-Khalaf HH, Aboussekhra A. The cytokine il-6 reactivates breast stromal fibroblasts through transcription factor STAT3-dependent up-regulation of the RNA-binding protein AUF1. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:30962–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Buskermolen JK, Roffel S, Gibbs S. Stimulation of oral fibroblast chemokine receptors identifies CCR3 and CCR4 as potential wound healing targets. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:2996–3005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Petersen SL, Peyton M, Minna JD, Wang X. Overcoming cancer cell resistance to Smac mimetic induced apoptosis by modulating cIAP-2 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:11936–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bertrand MJM, Milutinovic S, Dickson KM, Ho WC, Boudreault A, Durkin J, Gillard JW, Jaquith JB, Morris SJ, Barker PA. cIAP1 and cIAP2 facilitate cancer cell survival by functioning as E3 ligases that promote RIP1 ubiquitination. Mol Cell. 2008;30:689–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Annunziata CM, Davis RE, Demchenko Y, Bellamy W, Gabrea A, Zhan F, Lenz G, Hanamura I, Wright G, Xiao W, Dave S, Hurt EM, Tan B, Zhao H, Stephens O, Santra M, Williams DR, Dang L, Barlogie B, Shaughnessy JD, Kuehl WM, Staudt LM. Frequent engagement of the classical and alternative NF-κB pathways by diverse genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:115–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Keats JJ, Fonseca R, Chesi M, Schop R, Baker A, Chng W-J, Van Wier S, Tiedemann R, Shi C-X, Sebag M, Braggio E, Henry T, Zhu Y-X, Fogle H, Price-Troska T, Ahmann G, Mancini C, Brents LA, Kumar S, Greipp P, Dispenzieri A, Bryant B, Mulligan G, Bruhn L, Barrett M, Valdez R, Trent J, Stewart AK, Carpten J, Bergsagel PL. Promiscuous mutations activate the Noncanonical NF-κB pathway in multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:131–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yamaguchi N, Ito T, Azuma S, Ito E, Honma R, Yanagisawa Y, Nishikawa A, Kawamura M, Imai JI, Watanabe S, Semba K. Constitutive activation of nuclear factor-κB is preferentially involved in the proliferation of basal-like subtype breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1668–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yamamoto M, Ito T, Shimizu T, Ishida T, Semba K, Watanabe S, Yamaguchi N, Inoue JI. Epigenetic alteration of the NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) gene is involved in enhanced NIK expression in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:2391–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Su S, Chen J, Yao H, Liu J, Yu S, Lao L, Wang M, Luo M, Xing Y, Chen F, Huang D, Zhao J, Yang L, Liao D, Su F, Li M, Liu Q, Song E. CD10+GPR77+ cancer-associated fibroblasts promote cancer formation and chemoresistance by sustaining cancer stemness. Cell. 2018;172:841-856.e16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weigel KJ, Jakimenko A, Conti BA, Chapman SE, Kaliney WJ, Leevy WM, Champion MM, Schafer ZT. CAF-secreted IGFBPs regulate breast cancer cell anoikis. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12:855–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Orimo A, Gupta PB, Sgroi DC, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Delaunay T, Naeem R, Carey VJ, Richardson AL, Weinberg RA. Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell. 2005;121:335–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang C, Shang C, Gai X, Song T, Han S, Liu Q, Zheng X. Sulfatase 2-induced cancer-associated fibroblasts promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression via inhibition of apoptosis and induction of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Valiño-Rivas L, Vaquero JJ, Sucunza D, Gutierrez S, Sanz AB, Fresno M, Ortiz A, Sanchez-Niño MD. NIK as a druggable mediator of tissue injury. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25:341–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Blaquiere N, Castanedo GM, Burch JD, Berezhkovskiy LM, Brightbill H, Brown S, Chan C, Chiang P-C, Crawford JJ, Dong T, Fan P, Feng J, Ghilardi N, Godemann R, Gogol E, Grabbe A, Hole AJ, Hu B, Hymowitz SG, Alaoui Ismaili MH, Le H, Lee P, Lee W, Lin X, Liu N, McEwan PA, McKenzie B, Silvestre HL, Suto E, Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Wu G, Wu LC, Zhang Y, Zhong Z, Staben ST. Scaffold-hopping approach to discover potent, selective, and efficacious inhibitors of NF-κB inducing kinase. J Med Chem. 2018;61:6801–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pippione AC, Sainas S, Federico A, Lupino E, Piccinini M, Kubbutat M, Contreras JM, Morice C, Barge A, Ducime A, Boschi D, Al-Karadaghi S, Lolli ML. N -Acetyl-3-amino pyrazoles block the non-canonical NF-kB cascade by selectively inhibiting NIK. Medchemcomm. 2018;9:963–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ren X, Li X, Jia L, Chen D, Hou H, Rui L, Zhao Y, Chen Z. A small-molecule inhibitor of NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) protects liver from toxin-induced inflammation, oxidative stress, and injury. FASEB J. 2017;31:711–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Brightbill HD, Suto E, Blaquiere N, Ramamoorthi N, Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Gogol EB, Castanedo GM, Jackson BT, Kwon YC, Haller S, Lesch J, Bents K, Everett C, Kohli PB, Linge S, Christian L, Barrett K, Jaochico A, Berezhkovskiy LM, Fan PW, Modrusan Z, Veliz K, Townsend MJ, DeVoss J, Johnson AR, Godemann R, Lee WP, Austin CD, McKenzie BS, Hackney JA, Crawford JJ, Staben ST, Alaoui Ismaili MH, Wu LC, Ghilardi N. NF-κB inducing kinase is a therapeutic target for systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Takeda T, Tsubaki M, Sakamoto K, Ichimura E, Enomoto A, Suzuki Y, Itoh T, Imano M, Tanabe G, Muraoka O, Matsuda H, Satou T, Nishida S. Mangiferin, a novel nuclear factor kappa B-inducing kinase inhibitor, suppresses metastasis and tumor growth in a mouse metastatic melanoma model. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2016;306:105–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Willmann KL, Klaver S, Doğu F, Santos-Valente E, Garncarz W, Bilic I, Mace E, Salzer E, Conde CD, Sic H, Májek P, Banerjee PP, Vladimer GI, Haskoloğlu S, Bolkent MG, Küpesiz A, Condino-Neto A, Colinge J, Superti-Furga G, Pickl WF, van Zelm MC, Eibel H, Orange JS, Ikincioğulları A, Boztuğ K. Biallelic loss-of-function mutation in NIK causes a primary immunodeficiency with multifaceted aberrant lymphoid immunity. Nat Commun. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gu M, Zhou X, Sohn JH, Zhu L, Jie Z, Yang JY, Zheng X, Xie X, Yang J, Shi Y, Brightbill HD, Kim JB, Wang J, Cheng X, Sun SC. NF-κB-inducing kinase maintains T cell metabolic fitness in antitumor immunity. Nat Immunol. 2021;22:193–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Fata JE, Kong Y-Y, Li J, Sasaki T, Irie-Sasaki J, Moorehead RA, Elliott R, Scully S, Voura EB, Lacey DL, Boyle WJ, Khokha R, Penninger JM. The osteoclast differentiation factor osteoprotegerin-ligand is essential for mammary gland development. Cell. 2000;103:41–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schramek D, Leibbrandt A, Sigl V, Kenner L, Pospisilik JA, Lee HJ, Hanada R, Joshi PA, Aliprantis A, Glimcher L, Pasparakis M, Khokha R, Ormandy CJ, Widschwendter M, Schett G, Penninger JM. Osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL controls development of progestin-driven mammary cancer. Nature. 2010;468:98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Michaelson JS, Cho S, Browning B, Zheng TS, Lincecum JM, Wang MZ, Hsu YM, Burkly LC. Tweak induces mammary epithelial branching morphogenesis. Oncogene. 2005;24:2613–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yin X, Luistro L, Zhong H, Smith M, Nevins T, Schostack K, Hilton H, Lin TA, Truitt T, Biondi D, Wang X, Packman K, Rosinski J, Berkofsky-Fessler W, Tang JP, Pant S, Geho D, Vega-Harring S, De Mario M, Levitsky H, Simcox M. RG7212 anti-TWEAK mAb inhibits tumor growth through inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and survival signaling and by enhancing the host antitumor immune response. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:5686–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chang K-C, Diermeier SD, Yu AT, Brine LD, Russo S, Bhatia S, Alsudani H, Kostroff K, Bhuiya T, Brogi E, Pappin DJ, Bennett CF, Rigo F, Spector DL. MaTAR25 lncRNA regulates the Tensin1 gene to impact breast cancer progression. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahmat Amin MKB, Shimizu A, Zankov DP, Sato A, Kurita S, Ito M, Maeda T, Yoshida T, Sakaue T, Higashiyama S, Kawauchi A, Ogita H. Epithelial membrane protein 1 promotes tumor metastasis by enhancing cell migration via copine-III and Rac1. Oncogene. 2018;37:5416–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhu S, Jin J, Gokhale S, Lu AM, Shan H, Feng J, Xie P. Genetic alterations of TRAF proteins in human cancers. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Bunsyo Shiotani (National Cancer Center Research Institute) for providing the TIG-3 cells. We are also grateful to our laboratory members for worthwhile discussion and technical advice. Y.H. was supported by doctoral scholarships from the Futaba foundation. Schematics in figures were made using an academic license of BioRender.com.

Funding

This research was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ((Grant Numbers 18K16269: Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists to J.N., Grant Number 20J01794 to J.N. and 21K15562 to J.N.: Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows), Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research in Japan, the Fukushima Translational Research Project and the Japan Biological Informatics Consortium (JBiC) to S.W. and K.S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, TWIns, 2-2 Wakamatsu-Cho, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 162-8480, Japan

    Yusuke Hayashi, Jun Nakayama & Kentaro Semba

  2. Laboratory of Integrative Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan

    Yusuke Hayashi, Jun Nakayama & Yusuke Yamamoto

  3. Research Center for Asian Infectious Diseases, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Shirokane-Dai, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan

    Mizuki Yamamoto

  4. Division of Cell Growth and Tumor Regulation, Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University, Toon, 791-0295, Japan

    Masashi Maekawa & Shigeki Higashiyama

  5. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, 791-0295, Japan

    Masashi Maekawa & Shigeki Higashiyama

  6. Division of Physiological Chemistry and Metabolism, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Keio University, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan

    Masashi Maekawa

  7. Translational Research Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan

    Shinya Watanabe

  8. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Chuo-Ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan

    Shigeki Higashiyama

  9. Research Platform Office, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Shirokane-Dai, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan

    Jun-ichiro Inoue

Authors
  1. Yusuke Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Nakayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mizuki Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masashi Maekawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shinya Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shigeki Higashiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jun-ichiro Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yusuke Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kentaro Semba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JN and KS conceived and designed the study. YH and JN performed the analyses and the experiments. MY, MM, SW, SH, JI and YY interpreted the data. YH wrote the original paper. JN, YY and KS revised the manuscripts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun Nakayama or Kentaro Semba.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal experiments were performed in compliance with the guidelines of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute (Experimental Number: T18-009) and the Animal Committee of Waseda University (Accession Numbers: WD19-058, 2019-A068, WD20-005, 2020-A067, WD21-082, 2021-A074).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Table S1 List of antibody used in this study. Table S2 List of RT-qPCR primer used in this research. Table S3 List of primer and shRNA sequence used in this research. Table S4 Gene expression results of microarray data (Comparison with parent cells: log2FC). Table S5 Gene expression results of RT-qPCR (Comparison with parent cells: log2FC). Table S6 Protein expression results of western blot (Comparison with parent cell: log2FC). Table S7 DEGs list of RNA-seq analysis (criteria: FDR <0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg method) and log fold change |Log2(FC)|>1). Table S8 GSEA result of the RNA-seq data using Hallmark gene set. Table S9 GSEA result of the RNA-seq data using GO gene set. Table S10 NIK IHC result of breast cancer tissue microarray. Table S11 NIK and cIAP1 IHC result of breast cancer tissue microarray (consecutive cuts).SP:sample peel.

Additional file 2

: Figure. S1. The validation of the microarray analysis result by RT-qPCR for target genes of the signal analysis. Figure. S2. The validation of the western blotting data by immunofluorescence staining of NF-κB2 (p100/52) and RelB. Figure. S3. The alteration of NIK protein production by cIAP1 ectopic expression and knockdown control exhibit negative correlation in LM05 and Parent cells. Figure. S4. NIK knockdown cell liens were decreased in NIK expression and nuclear localization of p52 and RelB. Figure. S5. NIK ectopic expression partially rescued the reduction in tumorigenicity induced by NIK knockdown. Figure. S6. The anti-NIK antibody is valuable for IHC to detect NIK protein. Figure. S7. NIK expression was not correlated with PR, ER, or HER2 scores. Figure. S8. cIAP1 protein level didn’t differ significantly between normal and tumor tissue. Figure. S9. The TVI model showed that the lung metastatic potential of LM05 cells was not enhanced compared with parental cells. Figure. S10. Some known lung metastasis-promoting genes are highly expressed in the LM05 cell line independent of NIK knockdown.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayashi, Y., Nakayama, J., Yamamoto, M. et al. Aberrant accumulation of NIK promotes tumor growth by dysregulating translation and post-translational modifications in breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int 23, 57 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-02904-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-02904-y

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us