Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Primary research
  • Open access
  • Published:

FPGS rs1544105 polymorphism is associated with treatment outcome in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Cancer Cell International volume 13, Article number: 107 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Folypolyglutamate synthase (FPGS) catalyzes the polyglutamation of folates and antifolates, such as methotrexate (MTX), to produce highly active metabolites. FPGS tag SNP rs1544105C > T is located in the gene promoter. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of rs1544105 polymorphism on the treatment outcome in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL).

Methods

This study enrolled 164 children with BCP-ALL. We genotyped the FPGS SNP rs1544105, and analyzed the associations between its genotypes and treatment outcome. We also examined FPGS mRNA levels by real-time PCR in 64 of the 164 children, and investigated the function of this polymorphism on gene expression.

Results

We found significantly poor relapse-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.010) and poor event-free survival (EFS) (p = 0.046) in carriers of CC genotype. Multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for possible confounding variables showed that, relative to the CT + TT genotypes, the CC genotype was an independent prognostic factor for poor RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 4.992.; 95% CI, 1.550-16.078; p = 0.007). No association was found between any toxicity and rs1544105 polymorphism. Quantitative PCR results showed that individuals with the T allele had lower levels of FPGS transcripts.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that FPGS rs1544105C > T polymorphism might influence FPGS expression and affect treatment outcome in BCP-ALL patients.

Background

Cure rates for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have exceeded 80%. However, for the 15-20% of children with newly diagnosed ALL who will ultimately relapse, traditional risk assessment remains inadequate [1]. Multiple studies have suggested that the outcome in childhood ALL may be affected by how rapidly and effectively an individual patient metabolizes certain chemotherapeutic agents [2]. Thus, if the germline polymorphisms in drug-metabolism genes were better defined, tailored drug therapy based on these factors might further improve outcome.

Methotrexate (MTX) is a major component in all contemporary treatment protocols for childhood ALL. High-dose MTX (HDMTX) is associated with an improved outcome in ALL patients. Despite its clinical success, MTX may lead to several toxicities in a considerable number of patients [3, 4]. Folypoly-γ-glutamate synthetase (FPGS) is responsible for the activation of MTX to MTX polyglutamates (MTXPGs). Loss of FPGS activity is an established mechanism of resistance to MTX in vitro and in vivo[5–7]. FPGS activity is significantly correlated with FPGS mRNA levels [8]. Overexpression of FPGS has been associated with increased sensitivity of several glioma cell lines to MTX [9]. In addition, altered FPGS expression was found associated with outcome of colorectal cancer patients [10]. In childhood ALL, a strong correlation exists between FPGS expression, intracellular MTXPGs accumulation and treatment outcome [8, 11].

Up to now, there have been a few reports on the clinical importance of polymorphisms in FPGS gene [12–14]. However, its clinical role in childhood ALL remains to be defined. FPGS rs1544105 C > T is a tag SNP through HapMap database (release #27) in the promoter of FPGS gene. It is reported that FPGS rs1544105 C allele was associated with MTX poor response [13, 14]. Panetta et al. found that rs1544105 polymorphism showed a significant relation to FPGS activity in childhood ALL [15]. So we hypothesized that rs1544105 might have important clinical roles in childhood ALL.

In the present study, we investigated the role of FPGS rs1544105 polymorphism in treatment outcome in children with newly diagnosed B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) and its influence on FPGS expression.

Results

Patient characteristics and FPGS genotyping

The main clinical characteristics of the 164 patients are shown in Table 1. FPGS rs1544105 genotype distribution is as follows: 14 CC (8.6%), 75 CT (45.7%), 75 TT (45.7%). Allele frequencies were in close agreement with values previously reported [13] and were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ2 = 0.620, p = 0.431). In our study, rs1544105 genotypes had no association with the common clinical indices (Table 2).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with BCP-ALL (N = 164)
Full size table
Table 2 The association between FPGS rs1544105 genotypes and patient characteristics (N = 164)
Full size table

FPGS rs1544105 T allele might cause decreased mRNA levels

As rs1544105 polymorphism is located in FPGS promoter, this polymorphism might impact the expression of FPGS. Therefore, we examined FPGS mRNA levels by real-time PCR in 64 children who had ≥70% leukemic cells in diagnostic bone marrow samples and sufficient cDNA for analysis, and whose FPGS rs1544105 genotypes were determined. As shown in Figure 1, we found that the FPGS rs1544105 T variant was associated with a relatively lower mRNA level. Average expression of patients harboring the CC genotype was approximately 1.5 times higher than CT (p = 0.041) and TT (p = 0.031) carriers. No significant differences were detected between CT and TT groups. In addition, FPGS mRNA expression had no association with gene fusions (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Figure 1
figure 1

The rs1544105 polymorphism influences mRNA levels of FPGS . The expression level of FPGS was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR and was normalized using ABL as reference gene. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.

Full size image

FPGS rs1544105 polymorphism and treatment outcome

Given that rs1544105 polymorphism might influence FPGS mRNA levels, and altered FPGS expression was found associated with outcome of colorectal cancer patients [9], we analyzed the correlation between FPGS rs1544105 genotypes and outcomes in 164 patients. Figure 2 showed the effects of rs1544105 polymorphism on treatment outcome. There was a significantly higher relapse rate in CC group compared with CT + TT carriers (CC: 28.6%, CT + TT: 8.0%; χ2: p = 0.034). A poor RFS was found in the CC group (log rank: p = 0.010), as well as a poor EFS (log rank: p = 0.046). Multivariate survival analysis showed that the rs1544105 CC genotype was an independent prognosis factor for poor RFS (HR, 4.992; 95% CI, 1.550-16.078; p = 0.007) compared with the CT + TT genotypes (Table 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

The prognostic significance of FPGS rs1544105 in 164 BCP-ALL patients treated according to CCLG-ALL 2008 protocol. The solid line was derived from the patients carrying CC genotype, dotted line from patients carrying CT and TT genotypes. There were different RFS (left, p = 0.010, by log-rank test) and EFS (right, p = 0.046, by log-rank test) between the two groups.

Full size image
Table 3 Multivariate Cox-regression analysis for RFS and EFS in patients with BCP-ALL (N = 164)
Full size table

FPGS rs1544105 polymorphism and MTX-related toxicity

FPGS is responsible for the activation of MTX to MTXPGs and higher MTXPGs level is associated with increased toxicity [4]. Given that rs1544105 polymorphism might influence FPGS mRNA levels, so we next analyze the association between FPGS rs1544105 genotypes and MTX-related toxicities during consolidation therapy. As the HR group was treated with HD-MTX and other chemotherapeutic drugs, for example Dexamethasone, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, Cytarabine, L-asparaginase, which may influenced the assessment of MTX toxicity, only 139 patients enrolled in SR and MR treatment groups were evaluable for the toxicity analysis. As shown in Table 4, results showed that there was no correlation between any toxicity and rs1544105 genotypes, calculated by χ2 test.

Table 4 The relationships between FPGS rs1544105 genotypes and MTX-related toxicity (SR and MR, N = 139)
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated whether FPGS rs1544105C > T polymorphism was associated with treatment outcome among childhood BCP-ALL patients. We found that CC genotype is significantly associated with poor RFS (p = 0.010) and EFS (p = 0.046) compared with the CT and TT genotypes. Furthermore, in multivariate Cox regression analysis, we found that the FPGS rs1544105 is an independent prognostic factor for RFS. Patients carrying the rs1544105 CC genotype displayed a higher risk of relapse than CT + TT genotypes (HR, 4.992; 95% CI, 1.550-16.078; p = 0.007), indicating that rs1544105 polymorphism is a potential predictor for survival in childhood BCP-ALL. Two previous studies reported that FPGS rs1544105 C allele was associated with MTX poor response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in north Indians [13, 14], which were in line with our finding. To our knowledge, this is the first report that FPGS rs1544105 is associated with outcome in pediatric ALL, which extended our understanding of the role of FPGS in MTX response.

Previous observations suggested that FPGS downregulation leads to resistance to MTX and novel antifolates in some cancer cell lines [5, 6, 16, 17]. As rs1544105 T allele carriers had lower FPGS mRNA level, it seems that they might be resistant to MTX therapy and had poor prognosis. However, our data suggested that T allele carriers had better RFS and EFS than CC genotype carriers, which appears to be in contrast with previous results. In fact, FPGS modulation affects both polyglutamylation of antifolates and folate cofactors [18–20]. Cho et.al reported that FPGS modulation on the chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells to MTX depends not only on MTX polyglutamylation but also on polyglutamylation of intracellular folate pools. So it is possible that FPGS rs1544105 T allele carriers had higher intracellular folate levels compared with CC genotype carriers, and consequently, increase in polyglutamylation of intracellular folate cofactors may diminish or even abolish the effects of decrease in polyglutamylation of antifolates. This might lead to enhanced chemosensitivity and better survival in T allele carriers. The differences of folate concentrations between T allele carriers and CC genotype carriers should be determined in the future.

Treatment-related toxicity can not only be life threatening, but is also one of the main reasons for interruption or discontinuation of chemotherapy, which may increase relapse risk [8, 21]. Two previous studies reported that FPGS rs1544105 C allele was associated with MTX poor response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in north Indians [13, 14]. In our study, no significant association was revealed between this polymorphism and any toxicity. The differences may result from our limited samples.

SNPs in gene regulatory region that alter the expression or function of proteins targeted by drugs can contribute significantly to variation in the responses of individuals. The rs1544105 is located in the promoter of FPGS gene, so we hypothesized that this polymorphism may affect treatment outcome by influencing FPGS mRNA expression. Among the164 genotyped patients, we analyzed the mRNA levels of 64 patients. We found that rs1544105 genotypes were correlated with mRNA levels of FPGS. The T allele carriers (CT + TT) had lower mRNA expression compared with CC genotype. Panetta et al. reported that FPGS activity of rs1544105 CC carriers was 2.6 times higher than CT and TT carriers in a St Jude ALL cohort [15]. As FPGS mRNA expression correlates with activity [8], their results were in agreement with ours. In order to understand the mechanism underlying the altering expression, we investigated the sequence for putative transcription factors binding sites using TRAP [22]. The studied SNP rs1544105 was located within a predicted binding site for cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) transcription factors, and to modulate the binding affinity of CREB, with higher affinities predicted for the C-allele. CREB is a transcription factor that regulates gene expression principally through activation of the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent cell signal transduction pathways by binding to the cAMP response element (CRE) region at the promoters. CREB is reported to be overexpressed in childhood ALL and be critical in leukemogenesis [23]. Further experiments are needed to reveal the detailed molecular mechanisms.

No statistical association was found between rs1544105 polymorphism and any clinical indices. It was reported that patients with TEL-AML1 and E2A-PBX1 fusion genes had significantly lower level of FPGS mRNA expression in childhood ALL. And TEL-AML1 and E2A-PBX1 can downregulate FPGS promoter activity and lead to lower mRNA expression and enzymatic activity [24, 25]. As rs1544105 influences FPGS expression, we supposed that this polymorphism might correlate with TEL-AML1 and E2A-PBX1 fusions. However, we found no association between rs1544105 and TEL-AML1 (p = 0.071) and E2A-PBX1 (p = 0.601) fusions. Neither did we found any association between FPGS mRNA level and TEL-AML1 (p = 0.070) and E2A-PBX1 (p = 0.198) fusions. The difference may result from our limited samples. But our data suggested that TEL-AML1+ patients had lower FPGS mRNA expression than TEL-AML1- ones (Additional file 1: Table S1), which was in agreement with previous results.

Conclusions

FPGS rs1544105C > T polymorphism may influence the expression of FPGS and be associated with treatment outcome in childhood BCP-ALL. Larger prospective studies should be undertaken to confirm our recent results. In addition, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear and needs further study.

Methods

Study population

The criterion for patient inclusion in this study was newly diagnosed BCP-ALL patients who had at least 3-year follow-up time till March 2013 and sufficient DNA samples. Based on this criterion, 164 children enrolled during March 2008 to March 2010 and treated according to Chinese Children’s Leukemia Group (CCLG)-ALL 2008 protocol were collected in our study. All subjects were unrelated ethnic Chinese (aged 1.0-15.0 years, median 4.0 years). The common clinical characteristics of 164 patients were shown in Table 1. The median follow-up time was 48.0 months (range, 2.0 to 59.0) with 13 patients suffered bone marrow relapse, 1 suffered isolated central nervous system (CNS) relapse, 2 suffered isolated testis relapse, 4 died of severe infections during induction, 7 lost follow-up, and 137 cases were in continued complete remission (CCR).

Patients were stratified into standard-risk, medium-risk and high-risk treatment groups (SR, MR and HR) according to age, white blood cell count (WBC) in peripheral blood, immunophenotype, fusion gene, karyotype, CNS status, prednisone response, day 15 and day 33 BM remission status, minimal residue disease (MRD) on day 33 and at day 78, etc. (Additional file 2: Table S2). Sixty-two (37.8%) patients were assigned to SR group, 81 (49.4%) to MR group, and 21 (12.8%) to HR group (Table 1). Each group of patients received different treatment regimens. The details of treatment during the consolidation period are outlined in Additional file 3: Table S3. Doses of MTX differed by different treatment branch: the standard-risk (SR) group received 2 g/m2, while the medium- risk (MR) and high-risk (HR) groups received 5 g/m2. In addition, Non-HR (SR and MR) patients received oral 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and HR patients received other drugs concurrently. Leucovorin rescue was given at 42 h, 48 h and 54 h from the start of MTX infusion. Of the 164 patients in this study, 139 were enrolled into the analysis of association between FPGS SNP rs1544105 polymorphism and MTX-related toxicity during consolidation therapy. There were a total of 25 patients not analyzed for MTX-related toxicity, including 4 patients who died before consolidation therapy, and 21 HR patients who were treated with HD-MTX and other chemotherapeutic drugs, for example Dexamethasone, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, Cytarabine, L-asparaginase, which may influenced the assessment of MTX toxicity.

Bone marrow (BM) samples of patients were collected at diagnosis. Monouclear cell separation was carried out as previously described [4, 26, 27] and cells were immediately stored at −70°C until use. This study was approved by the BCH Institutional Ethics Committee and informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki was signed by the guardians of the patients.

DNA extraction and SNP genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted using a Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (U-gene, Anhui, China). Genotypes of the FPGS SNP rs1544105 were determined by PCR-RFLP methods [14]. FPGS rs1544105 primer sequences were forward: 5′-GTGCCTCCTTCACACACAG-3′and reverse: 5′-CCCAGAGTCCTTATTCTTAGCC-3′. PCR products were digested with HpyCH4IV (New England BilLabs, Inc, Beverly, MA) and separated on 10% polyacrylamide gel. A 10% random sample (n = 17) of the cases was verified by directly DNA sequencing of the PCR products.

RNA extraction and FPGS expression analysis

The criterion for patient inclusion in expression analysis was ≥70% leukemic cells in diagnostic bone marrow samples and sufficient cDNA for analysis. Sixty-four patients among the 164 BCP-ALL genotyped in this study met this criterion and were included for a quantitative RNA expression assay. Total RNA from mononuclear cells was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). The mRNAs were reverse-transcribed into cDNAs using random hexamers and moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, USA). The mRNA expression level of FPGS was measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR using the ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Singapore) based on the SYBR Green method. The ABL gene was used as the internal control, as suggested by the Europe Against Cancer program [28]. The primer sequences used for FPGS PCR were forward: 5′-CCCCGAGGTTCGAGTCTTG-3′ and reverse: 5′-GTCACTGTGAAGTTCTGTTGGTCTG-3′; and the primer sequences used for ABL were forward: 5′-TGGAGATAACACTCTAAGCATAACTAAAGGT-3′ and reverse: 5′-GATGTAGTTGCTTGGGACCCA-3′. The PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 25 μl, including 12.5 μl of 2 × SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 2 μl of cDNA, and 1 μl of primer mix (10 μM each). The PCR program was as follows: 95°C for 10 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 1 minute, and a final step for generation of a dissociation curve to assess the specificity of the amplified products. Relative quantification analysis was performed using the comparative CT method (2-△△CT). Reactions were in triplicate in three independent experiments.

Toxicity

Toxicities were graded according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 1.0. Hematological toxicity (anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia) and non-hematological toxicity (skin toxicity, oral mucositis, and hepatic toxicity which means transaminase levels > 2 times as high as normal limit) were included. The highest grade of toxicity observed in each patient during the consolidation therapy period was recorded. No patients died from toxicity.

Statistical analysis

The allele frequencies of polymorphisms were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using the Chi-square (χ2) test. Toxicities were represented by the value 1or 0, indicating whether an adverse event did or not occur during the MTX course. χ2 test was used to determine the relationship between rs1544105 genotypes with toxicity, outcome and other clinicobiological characteristics. Relapse was defined as the reappearance of leukemic cells in BM (>5% blasts) and/or the reappearance of clinical evidence of the disease. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time from CR to the date of relapse, censored at date of last time of contact or death in remission. The duration of event-free survival (EFS) was defined from the date of diagnosis to the date of relapse or death, or the last contact with patients in continuous hematologic CR. The probability of RFS and EFS were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and univariate associations between rs1544105 genotypes were compared by log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox regression models adjust for potential confounding variables were used to analyze the prognostic significance of rs1544105 genotypes. All statistical analyses were 2 tailed and performed with SPSS 16.0 for Windows. P value less than 0.05 were considered significant.

References

  1. Pui CH, Evans WE: Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 166-178. 10.1056/NEJMra052603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vrooman LM, Silverman LB: Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: update on prognostic factors. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009, 21: 1-8. 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32831f1f24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pui CH, Campana D, Pei D, Bowman WP, Sandlund JT, Kaste SC, Ribeiro RC, Rubnitz JE, Raimondi SC, Onciu M: Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2009, 360 (26): 2730-2741. 10.1056/NEJMoa0900386.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu SG, Li ZG, Cui L, Gao C, Li WJ, Zhao XX: Effects of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms on toxicities during consolidation therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a Chinese population. Leuk Lymphoma. 2011, 52: 1030-1040. 10.3109/10428194.2011.563883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liani E, Rothem L, Bunni MA, Smith CA, Jansen G, Assaraf YG: Loss of folylpoly-gamma-glutamate synthetase activity is a dominant mechanism of resistance to polyglutamylation-dependent novel antifolates in multiple human leukemia sublines. Int J Cancer. 2003, 103: 587-599. 10.1002/ijc.10829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liani E, Rothem L, Bunni MA, Smith CA, Jansen G, Assaraf YG: Decreased folylpolyglutamate synthetase activity as a mechanism of methotrexate resistance in CCRF-CEM human leukemia sublines. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266: 6181-6187.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Masson E, Relling MV, Synold TW, Liu Q, Schuetz JD, Sandlund JT, Pui CH, Evans WE: Accumulation of methotrexate polyglutamates in lymphoblasts is a determinant of antileukemic effects in vivo. A rationale for high-dose methotrexate. J Clin Invest. 1996, 97: 73-80. 10.1172/JCI118409.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galpin AJ, Schuetz JD, Masson E, Yanishevski Y, Synold TW, Barredo JC, Pui CH, Relling MV, Evans WE: Differences in folylpolyglutamate synthetase and dihydrofolate reductase expression in human B-lineage versus T-lineage leukemic lymphoblasts: mechanisms for lineage differences in methotrexate polyglutamylation and cytotoxicity. Mol Pharmacol. 1997, 52: 1551-1563.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aghi M, Kramm CM, Breakefield XO: Folylpolyglutamyl synthetase gene transfer and glioma antifolate sensitivity in culture and in vivo. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999, 91 (14): 1233-1241. 10.1093/jnci/91.14.1233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Odin E, Wettergren Y, Nilsson S, Willén R, Carlsson G, Spears CP, Larsson L, Gustavsson B: Altered gene expression of folate enzymes in adjacent mucosa is associated with outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (16 Pt 1): 6012-6019.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rots MG, Willey JC, Jansen G, Van Zantwijk CH, Noordhuis P, DeMuth JP, Kuiper E, Veerman AJ, Pieters R, Peters GJ: mRNA expression levels of methotrexate resistance-related proteins in childhood leukemia as determined by a standardized competitive template-based RT–PCR method. Leukemia. 2000, 14: 2166-2175. 10.1038/sj.leu.2401943.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Straaten RJ, Wessels JA, De Vries-Bouwstra JK, Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, Allaart CF, Bogaartz J, Tiller M, Huizinga TW, Guchelaar HJ: Exploratory analysis of four polymorphisms in human GGH and FPGS genes and their effect in methotrexate-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2007, 8: 141-150. 10.2217/14622416.8.2.141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma S, Das M, Kumar A, Marwaha V, Shankar S, Aneja R, Grover R, Arya V, Dhir V, Gupta R: Interaction of genes from influx-metabolism-efflux pathway and their influence on methotrexate efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis patients among Indians. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008, 18: 1041-1049. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328311a8fd.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma S, Das M, Kumar A, Marwaha V, Shankar S, Singh P, Raghu P, Aneja R, Grover R, Arya V: Purine biosynthetic pathway genes and methotrexate response in rheumatoid arthritis patients among north Indians. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009, 19: 823-828. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328331b53e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Panetta JC, Sparreboom A, Pui CH, Relling MV, Evans WE: Modeling mechanisms of in vivo variability in methotrexate accumulation and folate pathway inhibition in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010, 6: e1001019-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001019.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mauritz R, Peters GJ, Priest DG, Assaraf YG, Drori S, Kathmann I, Noordhuis P, Bunni MA, Rosowsky A, Schornagel JH: Multiple mechanisms of resistance to methotrexate and novel antifolates in human CCRF-CEM leukemia cells and their implications for folate homeostasis. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002, 63: 105-115. 10.1016/S0006-2952(01)00824-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roy K, Egan MG, Sirlin S, Sirotnak FM: Posttranscriptionally mediated decreases in folylpolyglutamate synthetase gene expression in some folate analogue-resistant variants of the L1210 cell. Evidence for an altered cognate mRNA in the variants affecting the rate of de novo synthesis of the enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 6903-6908. 10.1074/jbc.272.11.6903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sohn KJ, Smirnakis F, Moskovitz DN, Novakovic P, Yates Z, Lucock M, Croxford R, Kim YI: Effects of folylpolyglutamate synthetase modulation on chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate. Gut. 2004, 53: 1825-1831. 10.1136/gut.2004.042713.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho RC, Cole PD, Sohn KJ, Gaisano G, Croxford R, Kamen BA, Kim YI: Effects of folate and folylpolyglutamyl synthase modulation on chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6: 2909-2920. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jansen G, Peters GJ, Pinedo HM, Priest DG, Assaraf YG: Folylpolyglutamyl synthetase gene transfer and glioma antifolate sensitivity in culture and in vivo. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999, 91: 2047-2050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Relling MV, Fairclough D, Ayers D, Crom WR, Rodman JH, Pui CH, Evans WE: Patient characteristics associated with high-risk methotrexate concentrations and toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 1994, 12: 1667-1672.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas-Chollier M, Hufton A, Heinig M, O’Keeffe S, Masri NE, Roider HG, Manke T, Vingron M: Transcription factor binding predictions using TRAP for the analysis of ChIP-seq data and regulatory SNPs. Nat Protoc. 2011, 6: 1860-1869. 10.1038/nprot.2011.409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pigazzi M, Ricotti E, Germano G, Faggian D, Aricò M, Basso G: cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) overexpression CREB has been described as critical for leukemia progression. Haematologica. 2007, 92 (10): 1435-1437. 10.3324/haematol.11122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kager L, Cheok M, Yang W, Zaza G, Cheng Q, Panetta JC, Pui CH, Downing JR, Relling MV, Evans WE: Folate pathway gene expression differs in subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and influences methotrexate pharmacodynamics. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115: 110-117.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leclerc GJ, Sanderson C, Hunger S, Devidas M, Barredo JC: Folylpolyglutamate synthetase gene transcription is regulated by a multiprotein complex that binds the TEL-AML1 fusion in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res. 2010, 34: 1601-1609. 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.05.012.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiao Y, Cui L, Gao C, Li W, Zhao X, Liu S, Wu M, Deng G, Li Z: CASP8AP2 is promising prognostic indicator in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res. 2012, 36: 67-71. 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.05.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao C, Zhao XX, Li WJ, Cui L, Zhao W, Liu SG, Yue ZX, Jiao Y, Wu MY, Li ZG: Clinical features, early treatment responses, and outcomes of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia in China with or without specific fusion transcripts: a single institutional study of 1,004 patients. Am J Hematol. 2012, 87 (11): 1022-1027. 10.1002/ajh.23307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beillard E, Pallisgaard N, van der Velden VH, Bi W, Dee R, van der Schoot E, Delabesse E, Macintyre E, Gottardi E, Saglio G: Evaluation of candidate control genes for diagnosis and residual disease detection in leukemic patients using ‘real-time’ quantitative reversetranscriptase polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)—a Europe against cancer program. Leukemia. 2003, 17: 2474-2486. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the project of National Key Technologies Research & Development Program of the 11th 5-Year Plan (No. 2007BAI04B03), National Science & Technology Major Project of the 12th 5-Year Plan (No. 2011ZX09302-007-01) and Capital Medical University Basic & Clinical Research Cooperation Foundation (No.13JL72).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, 56 Nanlishi Road, 100045, Beijing, China

    Shu-Guang Liu, Chao Gao, Rui-Dong Zhang, Ying Jiao, Lei Cui, Wei-Jing Li, Zhen-Ping Chen, Min-Yuan Wu, Hu-Yong Zheng, Xiao-Xi Zhao, Zhi-Xia Yue & Zhi-Gang Li

Authors
  1. Shu-Guang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chao Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui-Dong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ying Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lei Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei-Jing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhen-Ping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Min-Yuan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hu-Yong Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiao-Xi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhi-Xia Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhi-Gang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-Gang Li.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LSG and LZG designed the study. LSG performed the experiments, collected the data, and wrote the articles. GC, JY, CL, LWJ, ZXX, and YZX helped to collect the samples. ZRD, WMY, and ZHY recruited the patients. LSG, GC, JY and CZP participated in the statistical analysis. LZG reviewed the final manuscript and take primary responsibility for the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, SG., Gao, C., Zhang, RD. et al. FPGS rs1544105 polymorphism is associated with treatment outcome in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell Int 13, 107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-13-107

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-13-107

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us