- Primary Research
- Open Access
Combined EphB2 receptor knockdown with radiation decreases cell viability and invasion in medulloblastoma
- Shilpa Bhatia†1,
- Kellen Hirsch†1,
- Sanjana Bukkapatnam2,
- Nimrah A. Baig3,
- Ayman Oweida1,
- Anastacia Griego1,
- Dylan Calame2,
- Jaspreet Sharma1,
- Andrew Donson4,
- Nicholas Foreman4,
- Christopher Albanese3,
- Sujatha Venkataraman4,
- Rajeev Vibhakar4 and
- Sana D. Karam1Email author
© The Author(s) 2017
- Received: 3 September 2016
- Accepted: 7 March 2017
- Published: 29 March 2017
Medulloblastoma is one of the most common types of pediatric brain tumor characterized by the subpopulation of cells that exhibit high invasive potential and radioresistant properties. In addition, dysregulated function and signaling by Eph family of receptors have been shown to impart pro-tumorigenic characteristics in this brain malignancy. In the current study, we investigated whether EphB2 knockdown in combination with radiation can alter invasiveness and decrease medulloblastoma tumor growth or viability in vitro.
The expression of EphB2 receptor was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. Microarray analysis and mRNA analysis was performed on medulloblastoma patient datasets and compared to the normal cerebellum. The radiosensitization effect following EphB2 knockdown was determined by clonogenic assay in human medulloblastoma cells. Effects of EphB2-siRNA in absence or presence of radiation on cell cycle distribution, cell viability, and invasion were analyzed by flow cytometry, MTT assay, trypan blue exclusion assay, xcelligence system, and Western blotting.
We observed that EphB2 is expressed in both medulloblastoma cell lines and patient samples and its downregulation sensitized these cells to radiation as evident by decreased clonogenic survival fractions. EphB2 expression was also high across different medulloblastoma subgroups compared to normal cerebellum. The radiosensitization effect observed following EphB2 knockdown was in part mediated by enhanced G2/M cell cycle arrest. We also found that the combined approach of EphB2 knockdown and radiation exposure significantly reduced overall cell viability in medulloblastoma cells compared to control groups. Similar results were obtained in the xcelligence-based invasion assay. Western blot analysis also demonstrated changes in the protein expression of cell proliferation, cell survival, and invasion molecules in the combination group versus others.
Overall, our findings indicate that specific targeting of EphB2 receptor in combination with radiation may serve as an effective therapeutic strategy in medulloblastoma. Future studies are warranted to test the efficacy of this approach in in vivo preclinical models.
Medulloblastoma constitutes one of the most aggressive and commonly diagnosed brain malignancies in children . It arises from granule neuronal precursor cells in the cerebellum or from neural stem cells of the rhombic lip . The standard of care treatment for medulloblastoma is combination of surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy  but tumor recurrence remains a major problem.
One of the hallmarks of medulloblastoma is rapid and extensive central nervous system (CNS) dissemination along leptomeningeal surfaces because of the presence of migratory and invasive cell populations . To date, concerted research efforts have been directed in targeting these invasive and recurrent subpopulations in a tumor cell mass. However, the outcomes remain dismal. This can be attributed to the dysregulated function of some of the tyrosine kinase receptors that impart radioresistant properties and invasive potential to these tumors. For example, Morrison et al. , reported that certain Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and ligands were aberrantly regulated in the migrating medulloblastoma cells versus core tumor cells. These migrating cells were characterized by upregulation of EphB2 as shown by qPCR analysis in DAOY medulloblastoma cells . EphB2 has also been shown to play a critical role in medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and glioblastoma (GBM) by other research groups [5–7]. For example, Sikemma et al. , demonstrated increased invasion in EphB2-expressing medulloblastoma cell lines following ligand stimulation. This effect was completely blocked upon shRNA-mediated knockdown of EphB2 . Another group showed that EphB2 overexpression enhanced neurosphere cell migration and invasion and its targeted inhibition resulted in decreased invasion/migration in the GBM model .
Tumor cell migration is known to be facilitated by components such as fibronectin and collagen predominantly present in leptomeningeal extracellular matrix . In addition to intrinsic promoters of cell migration such as fibronectin and collagen , treatment-related factors have been reported to increase tumor cell motility. Photon irradiation (IR), a standard of care in medulloblastoma treatment, has been suggested to enhance medulloblastoma cell invasion, and preclinical studies have demonstrated increased tumor cell invasiveness through upregulation of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) signaling . Conversely, other groups have shown a decrease in migration and invasion following various dosing of photons and carbon ion irradiation , suggesting that additional studies are needed.
Therefore, in this study, we sought to address whether the combination of EphB2 knockdown with radiation would negate any pro-invasive effects radiation may have on medulloblastoma cells. In contrast to some observations in medulloblastoma cells [9, 11] and in non-medulloblastoma tumor cells , our data show that ionizing radiation did not promote tumor cell invasion but instead significantly decreased invasion, particularly in combination with EphB2 knockdown, which is consistent with other reports . In addition, we found that knockdown of EphB2, combined with radiation, decreased cell viability and clonogenic survival, in part through the inhibition of cell cycle progression. This is the first study to show the impact of EphB2 inhibition in combination with radiation in medulloblastoma cells and provides a rational basis for targeted inhibition of the EphB2 receptor as a potential radiosensitization strategy in medulloblastoma.
Medulloblastoma patient samples and cell lines
The cohort of medulloblastoma patient samples (n = 33) was obtained from Children’s Hospital Colorado and in compliance with local and federal human research protection guidelines and Institutional Review Board regulations (COM-IRB 95-500). Out of 33 patients analyzed, there were 8 females and 25 males (Additional file 1: Table S1). Additional information on the age distribution is included in Additional file 1: Table S1. Normal cerebellum samples (n = 5) were obtained from non-malignant brain autopsies at the Children’s Hospital Colorado following Institutional Review Board guidelines. The human medulloblastoma cell lines DAOY and UW228 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). These cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and primocin (Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
RNA extraction and microarray data analysis
Total RNA was extracted from all surgical samples, amplified, labeled, and hybridized to Affymetrix plus 2 microarray chips (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Data analysis was performed in the R programming language using open-source available through Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org) as described earlier .
Human EphB2 mRNA expression analysis
EPHB2 expression was analyzed by using the R2 platform (http://r2.amc.nl). Specifically, the following datasets were utilized for analysis: Medulloblastoma Kool (GSE10327)  and Medulloblastoma Gilbertson (GSE37418) . The subgroups in the Kool’s dataset are labeled based on the published literature [16, 17]. For normal expression, the Normal Cerebellum Roth dataset (GSE3526) was utilized. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare EPHB2 expression across medulloblastoma subgroups with normal cerebellum expression.
Normal human cerebellum and medulloblastoma patient sample was used to analyze the expression of EphB2 receptor by immunohistochemistry. Briefly, formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tumor sections were deparaffinized and hydrated followed by antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating the samples in 3% H2O2 in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were blocked in 2% milk followed by overnight incubation with anti-EphB2 antibody (5 μg/mL) at 4 °C. Anti-EphB2 antibody  was a kind gift by Dr. Elena B. Pasquale (Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, San Diego, CA, USA). Following washing in TBS, samples were incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature, followed by staining with DAB reagent. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, and images were captured on a 20× objective using Nikon microscope.
For transfection experiments, two different EphB2 targeting siRNAs were used. DAOY and UW228 cells were transfected in serum-free DMEM using TransIT-TKO Transfection Reagent (Mirus, Madison, WI, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Short interfering RNAs (siRNA) specific for human EphB2 and the non-specific control siRNA (NS-siRNA) were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). For the functional and mechanistic experiments reported in this study, cells were transfected using 10 μL TransIT-TKO for a final working concentration of 25 nM siRNA. The transfection complex was added to the cells and 20 h post-transfection, the medium was replaced with fresh serum-containing and antibiotic-containing growth medium. Cells were analyzed at optimal time-points by different assays.
Cells were irradiated with indicated radiation doses using a RS-2000 (Rad Source Technologies, Inc) X-ray irradiator, a 160 KVp source, at 25 mAmp, and at a dose rate of 1.24 Gy/min.
Whole cell lysate preparation and immunoblotting
Medulloblastoma cells transfected with EphB2-siRNA or control NS-siRNA in the absence or the presence of radiation were harvested at different time-points. Cells were homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., IL, USA) and phosphatase inhibitor (Sigma, MO, USA) on ice for 30 min. The homogenate was centrifuged at 4 °C at 13,000 rpm for 20 min, and lysates were collected. Protein concentration was determined using the BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., IL, USA). Lysates (20–30 μg) were loaded onto 10–12% SDS-PAGE gels. Electrophoresis, blocking, probing, and detection of proteins were conducted as described earlier . Membranes were probed overnight at 4 °C with respective antibodies. All primary antibodies (anti-PCNA, anti-Bcl-XL/S, anti-vimentin, anti-cyclinB1, and anti-β-actin) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Clonogenic survival assay
Survival fraction following ionizing radiation in NS-siRNA or EphB2-siRNA transfected cells was normalized taking into consideration plating efficiency in that particular group at 0 Gy. Each experiment was replicated at least three times.
Cell cycle analysis
DAOY cells were seeded at a density of 75,000 cells per well in six-well plates in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS and primocin. Following overnight incubation, cells were transfected using 25 nM EphB2-siRNA or control NS-siRNA in serum-free, antibiotic-free growth medium. At 24 h after transfection, the medium was exchanged with growth medium containing primocin and cells were irradiated using X-ray irradiator. At 72 h post-radiation, cells were harvested, washed in ice-cold PBS, fixed overnight in 70% ethanol, followed by staining with propidium iodide. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed at the indicated time-point by flow cytometer.
DAOY and UW228 cells were seeded at a density of 150,000 cells per well in six-well plates and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, primocin for 24 h prior to transfection with siRNA. Cells were transfected using 25 nM EphB2-siRNA or control NS-siRNA in serum-free, antibiotic-free DMEM. At 24 h after transfection, medium was exchanged for 10% DMEM containing primocin and cells were replated at a density of 3000 cells/well in 96-well plates. After overnight incubation, cells were exposed to 8 Gy dose of radiation and analyzed 144 h later following addition of the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Optical density was measured on a microplate reader at a wavelength of 590 nm.
Trypan blue dye exclusion
DAOY and UW228 cells were seeded at a density of 150,000 cells per well in six-well plates and maintained in DMEM containing 10% FBS and primocin. Cells were transfected as indicated above and replated at a density of 30,000 cells/well in a six-well plate. Approximately 24 h post-plating, cells were exposed to 8 Gy dose of radiation. After 120–144 h post-radiation, cells were collected by trypsinization. To each 10 μL aliquot of cells, 10 μL of trypan blue dye was added. Cell counting was performed using the T-20 automated cell counter (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
The xCELLigence RTCA DP Analyzer (Roche, CA) was used to determine the effect of EphB2 knockdown in absence and presence of radiation on invasion in a CIM-16 plate (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The CIM-16 plate is a modified Boyden chamber in which the porous membrane separating the double-chambered well is coated with gold microelectrodes. In this system, cells invading through the upper chamber into the lower chamber adhere to these microelectrodes, increasing the electrical impedance across this membrane. Electrical impedance is measured as a “cell index,” which directly correlates to the number of cells that have invaded into the lower chamber and adhered to the underside of the membrane. Background measurement was taken by adding cell-free, serum-free DMEM to the upper and lower chambers of each well. The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h prior to measuring background electrical impedance for each well. At 20 h post-radiation, cells were starved for 4 h in serum-free, and antibiotic-free DMEM, prior to collection by trypsinization. Cells were resuspended in serum-free DMEM with primocin and seeded in the upper chamber (coated with 1:40 dilution of matrigel) at a density of 50,000 cells per well. Invasion was monitored for 35 h. Delta cell index values were calculated by subtracting cell index values in the absence of a serum gradient from cell index values in the presence of a serum gradient. Cell index values between different treatment groups were determined at 3 h-intervals after the start of the experiment.
All the experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate and repeated two to three times. Quantitative analyses were performed using Student’s t test or one way ANOVA by GraphPad Prism software. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Medulloblastoma patient samples express high levels of EphB2 receptor
EphB2 receptor is efficiently knocked down using targeted siRNA approach in medulloblastoma cells
We validated the expression of EphB2 in two different human medulloblastoma cell lines DAOY and UW228. The DAOY cell line is derived from a 4-year old male patient and the UW228 cell line is derived from a 9-year old female patient . The EphB2 receptor is expressed in both DAOY and UW228 cells (Fig. 1e). To investigate the functional role of EphB2 in our in vitro model system, we transiently transfected medulloblastoma cells with either an EphB2-siRNA or a control NS-siRNA and analyzed the knockdown efficiency at protein level. Our Western blot analyses show a reduction in EphB2 levels in the cells transfected with EphB2-specific siRNA compared to control NS-siRNA at 72 h post-transfection (Fig. 1e).
EphB2 receptor knockdown sensitizes medulloblastoma cells to ionizing radiation
EphB2 receptor knockdown followed by radiation enhances cell cycle distribution in G2/M phase in medulloblastoma cells
Combined EphB2 receptor knockdown with radiation decreases medulloblastoma cell growth and viability
EphB2 knockdown combined with radiation decreases invasion in medulloblastoma cells
EphB2 knockdown with radiation modulates the expression of cell proliferation, invasion, and survival proteins
Medulloblastoma comprises of one of the most frequently occurring solid malignancies and leading cause of cancer related deaths in children. Based on the molecular profiling, medulloblastomas are categorized into four principal subgroups: Wnt, Sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4 [16, 17, 21]. The classification of these subgroups is based on the specific signaling pathways thought to be dysregulated in their pathogenesis and by clinical, histological, and genetic features . Currently, treatment strategies for medulloblastoma patients are largely influenced by factors such as risk stratification and age of the patient. Recent subclassification and exploration into the particular pathways and targets predominantly affected in each of these subgroups may allow personalized management of these tumors. In the analysis performed on medulloblastoma patients, we observed a variable but significant increase in the expression of EphB2 across the different subgroups compared to the normal cerebellum. Growing evidence over the past few years have reported aberrant regulation of the Eph family of receptors and their cognate ligands in a number of human malignancies, including medulloblastoma [4–6, 19, 22–24]. In the present study, we investigated, for the first time, the effects of combined EphB2 knockdown and radiation on cell growth, viability, and invasiveness of medulloblastoma cells. Our data show that the combined downregulation of EphB2 and radiation exposure decreased clonogenic survival fractions, induced G2/M cell cycle arrest, inhibited cell growth and viability, and reduced cell invasion. These effects were mainly studied in two medulloblastoma cell lines DAOY and UW228, that are reportedly associated with the SHH subgroup [25, 26].
We documented, for the first time, that EphB2 receptor knockdown sensitizes medulloblastoma cells to ionizing radiation. It is consistent with previous reports showing that in addition to stimulating tumor growth, development, and metastasis, Eph/ephrin family members also confer radioresistant characteristics to cancer cells [19, 27]. Our cell cycle data show an increase in the accumulation of cells in G2/M phase when EphB2-siRNA transfected cells were exposed to an optimal dose of radiation. Considering that G2/M phase is one of the most radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle, our data is consistent with the published literature .
Following cell cycle distribution analysis, we also performed cell viability assays demonstrating growth inhibitory effects of EphB2 knockdown when combined with radiation. EphB2 knockdown alone did not produce any significant changes in cell viability in both DAOY and UW228 cells. Our data are consistent with a study published by Sikemma and colleagues where they did not observe any direct effects on cell proliferation in medulloblastoma cell lines following silencing of EphB2 receptor . However, EphB2 knockdown approach in combination with radiation, resulted in a significant reduction in viability as observed in both the medulloblastoma cell lines. This synergy is further validated in clonogenic assay where EphB2 knockdown enhances the radiosensitivity of these cells that appears to be partially mediated via cell cycle arrest. In line with our functional assays, we observed changes in the expression of proteins that play a critical role in tumor cell growth, proliferation, invasion, and cell survival pathways in combined EphB2 downregulated and irradiated group versus other groups.
Medulloblastoma tumors are characterized by the presence of tumor cell populations with high invasive potential, facilitating migration of these cells along leptomeningeal surfaces . It has been reported that medulloblastoma cells with high migratory phenotype exhibit elevated levels of EphB2 receptor  that could be responsible for increased migration/invasion. Sikemma et al. , also demonstrated enhanced effects of ligand-mediated stimulation of EphB2 receptor on medulloblastoma cell invasion, which was further abrogated following shRNA mediated silencing of EphB2 receptor. Similar results were observed by another group in a GBM model, where EphB2 gain-of-function experiments increased neurosphere cell migration and invasion . In addition to EphB2, other studies in the literature have shown that medulloblastoma cells when exposed to radiation exhibit enhanced cell invasion [9, 11]. Therefore, in our study, we addressed the question whether knockdown of EphB2 receptor in combination with radiation would decrease the pro-invasive characteristics of medulloblastoma cells. Our findings show that when DAOY and UW228 cells were exposed to radiation, it resulted in decreased cell invasion. This is consistent with the findings published by Rieken et al. . The key observation in our experiments is the significant reduction in invasive potential of medulloblastoma cells following combined inhibition of EphB2 knockdown with radiation compared to other groups. This suggests that while EphB2 knockdown by itself may not be sufficient to produce desirable result and that inhibiting the expression or function of EphB2 could be beneficial when used as part of a radiosensitization strategy to reverse the malignant and invasive phenotype.
In conclusion, our data shed light on the efficacy of strategy involving combined EphB2-knockdown with radiation in medulloblastoma. This is evident by alterations in clonogenic survival, cell cycle distribution, medulloblastoma cell viability, and invasive potential in vitro. Future studies are warranted to test the efficacy of combined modality described in this study in other pre-clinical models. Regardless, our results emphasize the importance of combined EphB2 downregulation with radiation as a potential therapeutic approach to achieve anti-tumorigenic effects in pediatric medulloblastoma.
SBh participated in the experimental design, data collection, analysis, and writing of the manuscript. KH contributed in the experimental design, data collection, and analysis. SBu and NB participated in the data collection, and analysis. AO contributed in mRNA data analysis and review of the manuscript. AG, DC, and JS contributed in the review of the manuscript. AD, and NF shared their resources, participated in the review of the manuscript. SV, and RV shared their resources, contributed in the experimental design, and review of the manuscript. CA contributed to the study design, analysis, and review of the manuscript. SDK contributed to the project conception, study design, analysis, writing, and review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The flow cytometry was performed at the University of Colorado Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Shared Resource (FCSR).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
Literature collection was done by using electronic databases Pubmed. All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software. Raw and processed data are available upon request to the corresponding author of this article.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The cohort of medulloblastoma patient samples was obtained from Children’s Hospital Colorado and in compliance with local and federal human research protection guidelines and Institutional Review Board regulations (COM-IRB 95-500). Normal samples were obtained from non-malignant brain autopsies at the Children’s Hospital Colorado following Institutional Review Board guidelines.
Dr. Karam is supported by the Paul Calabresi Career Development Award for Clinical Oncology (K12), American Cancer Society (ACS) grant, Cancer League of Colorado Grant, and the Golfers for Cancer Grant.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Northcott PA, Jones DT, Kool M, Robinson GW, Gilbertson RJ, Cho YJ, Pomeroy SL, Korshunov A, Lichter P, Taylor MD, Pfister SM. Medulloblastomics: the end of the beginning. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(12):818–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Millard NE, De Braganca KC. Medulloblastoma. J Child Neurol. 2016;31(12):1341–53. doi:10.1177/0883073815600866.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fiorilli P, Partridge D, Staniszewska I, Wang JY, Grabacka M, So K, Marcinkiewicz C, Reiss K, Khalili K, Croul SE. Integrins mediate adhesion of medulloblastoma cells to tenascin and activate pathways associated with survival and proliferation. Lab Investig. 2008;88(11):1143–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Morrison LC, McClelland R, Aiken C, Bridges M, Liang L, Wang X, Di Curzio D, Del Bigio MR, Taylor MD, Werbowetski-Ogilvie TE. Deconstruction of medulloblastoma cellular heterogeneity reveals differences between the most highly invasive and self-renewing phenotypes. Neoplasia. 2013;15(4):384–98.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sikkema AH, den Dunnen WF, Hulleman E, van Vuurden DG, Garcia-Manero G, Yang H, Scherpen FJ, Kampen KR, Hoving EW, Kamps WA, Diks SH, Peppelenbosch MP, de Bont ES. EphB2 activity plays a pivotal role in pediatric medulloblastoma cell adhesion and invasion. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(9):1125–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang SD, Rath P, Lal B, Richard JP, Li Y, Goodwin CR, Laterra J, Xia S. EphB2 receptor controls proliferation/migration dichotomy of glioblastoma by interacting with focal adhesion kinase. Oncogene. 2012;31(50):5132–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen P, Rossi N, Priddy S, Pierson CR, Studebaker AW, Johnson RA. EphB2 activation is required for ependymoma development as well as inhibits differentiation and promotes proliferation of the transformed cell. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9248.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wikstrand CJ, Friedman HS, Bigner DD. Medulloblastoma cell-substrate interaction in vitro. Invasion Metastasis. 1991;11(6):310–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nalla AK, Asuthkar S, Bhoopathi P, Gujrati M, Dinh DH, Rao JS. Suppression of uPAR retards radiation-induced invasion and migration mediated by integrin β1/FAK signaling in medulloblastoma. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(9):e13006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rieken S, Rieber J, Brons S, Habermehl D, Rief H, Orschiedt L, Lindel K, Weber KJ, Debus J, Combs SE. Radiation-induced motility alterations in medulloblastoma cells. J Radiat Res. 2015;56(3):430–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Asuthkar S, Gondi CS, Nalla AK, Velpula KK, Gorantla B, Rao JS. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-mediated regulation of WNT/β-catenin signaling is enhanced in irradiated medulloblastoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(24):20576–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wild-Bode C, Weller M, Rimner A, Dichgans J, Wick W. Sublethal irradiation promotes migration and invasiveness of glioma cells: implications for radiotherapy of human glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61(6):2744–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gump JM, Donson AM, Birks DK, Amani VM, Rao KK, Griesinger AM, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Johnston JM, Anderson RC, Rosenfeld A, Handler M, Gore L, Foreman N, Hankinson TC. Identification of targets for rational pharmacological therapy in childhood craniopharyngioma. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kool M, Koster J, Bunt J, Hasselt NE, Lakeman A, van Sluis P, Troost D, Meeteren NS, Caron HN, Cloos J, Mrsic A, Ylstra B, Grajkowska W, Hartmann W, Pietsch T, Ellison D, et al. Integrated genomics identifies five medulloblastoma subtypes with distinct genetic profiles, pathway signatures and clinicopathological features. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(8):e3088.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Robinson G, Parker M, Kranenburg TA, Lu C, Chen X, Ding L, Phoenix TN, Hedlund E, Wei L, Zhu X, Chalhoub N, Baker SJ, Huether R, Kriwacki R, Curley N, Thiruvenkatam R, et al. Novel mutations target distinct subgroups of medulloblastoma. Nature. 2012;488(7409):43–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Northcott PA, Dubuc AM, Pfister S, Taylor MD. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12(7):871–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Taylor MD, Northcott PA, Korshunov A, Remke M, Cho YJ, Clifford SC, Eberhart CG, Parsons DW, Rutkowski S, Gajjar A, Ellison DW, Lichter P, Gilbertson RJ, Pomeroy SL, Kool M, Pfister SM. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(4):465–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holash JA, Pasquale EB. Polarized expression of the receptor protein tyrosine kinase Cek5 in the developing avian visual system. Dev Biol. 1995;172(2):683–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhatia S, Baig NA, Timofeeva O, Pasquale EB, Hirsch K, MacDonald TJ, Dritschilo A, Lee YC, Henkemeyer M, Rood B, Jung M, Wang XJ, Kool M, Rodriguez O, Albanese C, Karam SD. Knockdown of EphB1 receptor decreases medulloblastoma cell growth and migration and increases cellular radiosensitization. Oncotarget. 2015;6(11):8929–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ciucci A, Meco D, De Stefano I, Travaglia D, Zannoni GF, Scambia G, Riccardi R, Saran A, Mancuso M, Gallo D. Gender effect in experimental models of human medulloblastoma: does the estrogen receptor beta signaling play a role? PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101623.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kool M, Korshunov A, Remke M, Jones DT, Schlanstein M, Northcott PA, Cho YJ, Koster J, Schouten-van Meeteren A, van Vuurden D, Clifford SC, Pietsch T, von Bueren AO, Rutkowski S, McCabe M, Collins VP, et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: an international meta-analysis of transcriptome, genetic aberrations, and clinical data of WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4 medulloblastomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(4):473–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nakada M, Niska JA, Miyamori H, McDonough WS, Wu J, Sato H, Berens ME. The phosphorylation of EphB2 receptor regulates migration and invasion of human glioma cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):3179–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao Q, Liu W, Cai J, Li M, Gao Y, Lin W, Li Z. EphB2 promotes cervical cancer progression by inducing epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(2):372–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goparaju C, Donington JS, Hsu T, Harrington R, Hirsch N, Pass HI. Overexpression of EPH receptor B2 in malignant mesothelioma correlates with oncogenic behavior. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(9):1203–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alimova I, Ng J, Harris P, Birks D, Donson A, Taylor MD, Foreman NK, Venkataraman S, Vibhakar R. MPS1 kinase as a potential therapeutic target in medulloblastoma. Oncol Rep. 2016;36(5):2633–40.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Triscott J, Lee C, Foster C, Manoranjan B, Pambid MR, Berns R, Fotovati A, Venugopal C, O’Halloran K, Narendran A, Hawkins C, Ramaswamy V, Bouffet E, Taylor MD, Singhal A, Hukin J, et al. Personalizing the treatment of pediatric medulloblastoma: polo-like kinase 1 as a molecular target in high-risk children. Cancer Res. 2013;73(22):6734–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nojiri K, Iwakawa M, Ichikawa Y, Imadome K, Sakai M, Nakawatari M, Ishikawa K, Ishikawa A, Togo S, Tsujii H, Shimada H, Imai T. The proangiogenic factor ephrin-A1 is up-regulated in radioresistant murine tumor by irradiation. Exp Biol Med. 2009;234(1):112–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pawlik TM, Keyomarsi K. Role of cell cycle in mediating sensitivity to radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(4):928–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar