Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Primary research
  • Open Access

Establishment and characterization of a novel childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, HXEX-ALL1, with chromosome 9p and 17p deletions

†Contributed equally
Cancer Cell International201919:113

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0834-x

©  The Author(s) 2019

  • Received: 17 March 2019
  • Accepted: 20 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Although contemporary chemotherapy has improved the cure rate of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to nearly 90%, relapsed/refractory ALL is still a leading cause of tumor-related death in children. To clarify the underlying mechanisms of relapsed/refractory childhood ALL, researchers urgently need to establish novel cell models from patients with relapsed ALL after treatment with contemporary chemotherapy.

Methods

Cell culture technique was used to establish the HXEX-ALL1 cell line from primary B cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) cells. Molecular and cellular biological techniques including flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), short tandem repeat (STR) analysis, conventional cytogenetics, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were used to characterize the HXEX-ALL1 cell line. Nude mice were used for xenograft studies.

Results

A stable ALL cell line, HXEX-ALL1, derived from a 6-year-old boy of Han nationality with BCP-ALL at the second relapse, was established and maintained in culture for more than 18 months. The HXEX-ALL1 cell line was authenticated as being derived from primary leukemia cells based on morphologic, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and STR analyses and demonstrated tumorigenicity in nude mice. WGS data showed that there were 27,006 novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 193,951 novel insertion/deletions (InDels) in HXEX-ALL1 cells. Compared with the other BCP-ALL cell lines in use, the HXEX-ALL1 cells have a special karyotype represented by trisomy 8 and 9p and 17p deletions with a multidrug resistance phenotype, especially highly resistant to asparaginase.

Conclusions

The HXEX-ALL1 cell line may prove to be a useful model for the study of relapsed/refractory childhood ALL, particularly for the researches on asparaginase resistance.

Keywords

  • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • Leukemia cell line
  • Complex karyotype
  • Chromosome 9p deletion
  • Chromosome 17p deletion

Background

Cell culture has been performed for more than a century [1–3]. Cell lines established from tumors are the most commonly used models in tumor research and have enabled a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of different tumors and provided the means to develop effective treatment strategies [4]. In addition to primary patient materials and animal models, tumor cell lines are one of the three major models for cancer research [4]. The first human cell line was HeLa, established in 1951 by Gey [5]. In 1955, the first human leukemia cell line was derived from a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by Osgood and Burke [6]. Unfortunately, this cell line soon became contaminated with HeLa cells [7]. Then, the Raji cell line was established as the first leukemia-lymphoma cell line in 1963 by Pulvertaft [8]. Currently, 637 characterized leukemia-lymphoma cell lines are in use [3]. The leading source of leukemia-lymphoma cell lines is Japan (40%), followed by the USA (26%), and only 4 leukemia-lymphoma cell lines have originated in China [3]. Additionally, there are no pediatric leukemia cell lines from China in the ATCC and DSMZ cell banks.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a malignancy originating from a B or T cell progenitor, is the most common leukemia in children, accounting for approximately 80% of all pediatric leukemia [9]. Fortunately, due to better risk stratification and the advent of multidrug risk-adapted chemotherapy regimens, improved central nervous system prophylaxis and better supportive care, the cure rates are approximately 90% for pediatric patients with ALL [9–14]. For patients enrolled in the CCLG-ALL 2008 protocol in China, the 5-year survival rate was 85.3% [15]. However, 10–15% of patients still relapsed and had a dismal prognosis [14, 16]. Due to the high morbidity of ALL, relapsed/refractory ALL is still the leading cause of tumor-related death in children [14, 16]. Thus, it is very important to clarify the underlying mechanisms of relapsed/refractory ALL. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no leukemia cell lines derived from pediatric patients relapsed after treatment with contemporary chemotherapy.

In this study, we reported a novel B cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) cell line called HXEX-ALL1, which was established from the Bone marrow (BM) of a 6-year boy with BCP-ALL during his second relapse in our hospital. The cell line was authenticated as being derived from primary leukemia cells and displayed tumorigenicity in nude mice. The cell line had a Complex karyotype (CK; with ≥ 3 structural chromosomal abnormalities) with trisomy 8 and 9p and 17p deletions, and displayed a multi-drug resistant phenotype with highly resistant to l-asparaginase (L-Asp). The phenotypic, genetic and functional properties of this cell line were described following the guidelines for the characterization and publication of human malignant hematopoietic cell lines [17].

Methods

Case report

The HXEX-ALL1 cell line was derived from a 6-year-old Chinese boy of Han ancestry with BCP-ALL. The patient was admitted to West China Second University Hospital (Chengdu) in 2016 because of podalgia and hemorrhage under the skin. Physical examination upon admission revealed pale lips and enlarged superficial lymph nodes. Complete blood count revealed a white blood cell count of 22.9 × 109/l with 60% blast cells, hemoglobin level of 105 g/l, and platelet count of 52 × 109/l. BM examination revealed hypercellular marrow with 92% blasts that were negative for peroxidase staining. The primary leukemia cells were positive for CD10, CD19, CD22, cCD79 and HLA-DR, partially positive for CD5, and negative for CD20, sIgM, cIgM, CD2, CD3, CD7, cCD3, CD13, CD33, CD117 and CD34 and were thus categorized as the common B subtype according to the EGIL classification [18]. G-banding analysis of the BM revealed the karyotype 47, XY, +8, del(9p22), del(17p12). FISH analysis demonstrated negative expression of MLL, BCR-ABL, ETV6-RUNX1 and PDGFRB fusion genes. Multiple real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses indicated negativity for the following fusion genes: MLL-AF4, MLL-AF6, MLL-AF10, TEL-AML1, MLL-ENL, BCR-ABL P210, BCR-ABL P190, SIL-TAL, E2A-HLF, CALM-AF10, HOX11, HOX11L2, SET-CAN, TEL-ABL1, TLS-ERG, NPM-ALK and E2A-PBX1. The patient received chemotherapy according to the Chinese Childhood Cancer Group ALL 2015 (CCCG-ALL-2015) protocol. The regimen included dexamethasone (DEX), pegaspargase (Peg-Asp), vincristine (VCR), daunorubicin (DNR), cyclophosphamide (CTX), cytarabine (Ara-c), mercaptopurine (6-MP), and methotrexate (MTX). After 19 days of chemotherapy, the proportion of blasts in the BM was reduced to 1%, demonstrating complete remission (CR) and negative minimal residual disease (MRD) (< 0.01%). The patient was classified into a low-risk group. However, he experienced BM relapse after 4 months, and re-induction of chemotherapy led to another CR 1 month later. The re-induction chemotherapy regimen included DEX, mitoxantrone (MTZ), vindesine (VDS), Peg-Asp, MTX, etoposide (VP-16), and Ara-c. Unfortunately, the patient experienced a second BM relapse in 3 months, and this time, chemotherapy did not lead to a CR.

Cell culture

Primary BM cells were obtained from the patient at the second relapse of ALL. The patient provided informed consent. Mononuclear cells were isolated and separated by Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation and cultured in a 6-well plate (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 6 × 106/ml in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 10 ng/ml rhIL-3 at 37 °C with 5% carbon dioxide (CO2). The medium was replaced every 3–5 days depending on the cell growth rate to maintain the cells at a density of 1–3×106/ml. The cells were examined daily under an inverted microscope, and the cell number was determined every 3 days with a standard hematocytometer using trypan blue dye exclusion. After 3 weeks of lag phase, the cell number dramatically increased, and the cell density was adjusted to 0.5–2×106/ml. After 5 weeks, rhIL-3 was omitted from the complete medium, and the FBS concentration was reduced to 10% in the complete culture medium after 7 weeks. For subcloning, 1 × 105 cells were seeded in MethoCult GFH4434 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) medium in six-well culture plates and incubated for 7–10 days. Colonies were extracted and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. In this study, other leukemia-lymphoma cell lines, such as NALM-6, CCRF-CEM, and Raji, were purchased from Shanghai Institute Cell Resources Bank. All cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 in-air atmosphere.

Cell morphologic assay

Morphological characteristics of live cultured cells were observed under an inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Smears of BM and HXEX-ALL1 cells were stained with Wright-Giemsa and observed under an optical microscope (Olympus). Cell ultrastructures were observed under a transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Immunophenotypic analysis

For the detection of the immunophenotype of the patient sample and HXEX-ALL1 cells, we used antibodies against the following targets: CD34, HLA-DR, CD38, CD117, CD56, CD19, CD20, CD79α, cCD79α, CD10, cIgM, sIgM, TdT, CD7, CD3, cCD3, CD5, CD4, CD8, CD2, MPO, CD33, CD13, CD11b, CD64, CD36, CD14, CD15, CD71, CD61, CD41, CD65, and CD45 (Becton–Dickinson Inc., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Positivity for the antigens was determined using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton–Dickinson Inc.).

G-banding analysis

Chromosomes were prepared by a standard method and analyzed by the G-banding technique. Karyotype was determined according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN, 2013).

Chromosomal microarray analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted with a Qiagen DNeasy Blood Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed using Affymetrix CytoScan HD arrays (Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The data were collected and analyzed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Microarray Instrument System (Affymetrix Inc.).

Western blotting analysis

Western blotting analysis was performed on lysates obtained from HXEX-ALL1, NALM-6, CCRF-CEM, and Raji cells. Proteins were separated by 15% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (0.22 μm, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Proteins were visualized by incubation with ECL plus reagent (Millipore). All experiments were independently carried out at least 3 times. The level of β-actin protein was used as a control for the amount of protein loaded onto each lane.

Ig and TCR arrangement analysis

Immunoglobulin (Ig) and T cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements analysis were detected by PCR. Genomic DNA was analyzed using multiplex primers designed against IgVH-A (FR1-JH), IgVH-B (FR2-JH), IgVH-C (FR3-JH), IgDH-A (DH1-6-JH), IgDH-B (DH7-JH), Igκ (Vκ-Jκ), Igλ (Vλ-Jλ), TCRB A, TCRB B, TCRB C, TCRG A, TCRG B and TCRD. The PCR mixture included the GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), primer mix and genomic DNA. PCR products were visualized using agarose gels stained with SYBR Green I.

Short tandem repeat analysis

The identity of the HXEX-ALL1 cell line was checked using short tandem repeat (STR) analysis against a BM sample taken from the patient. DNA was prepared from whole BM and HXEX-ALL1 cells using a Qiagen DNeasy Blood Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following 22 highly polymorphic STR loci were tested by multiplex PCR: Amelogenin, CSF1PO, D13S317, D16S539, D5S818, D7S820, TH01, TPOX, vWA, Penta E, Penta D, D2S441, D2S1338, D3S1358, D6S1043, D8S1179, D10S1248, D12S391, D18S51, D19S433, D21S11 and FGA.

Whole genome sequencing analysis

The whole genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted according to the BGISEQ-500 protocol. Clean reads were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh37/HG19) using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA).

Cell growth assay

Cells were cultured in a 6-well round-bottom plastic culture plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) at 6 × 105/ml in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS and grown for 8 days. Viable cells were counted using trypan blue (Sigma) staining every day. Td was calculated for cells in exponential growth with the following equation: Td (h) = t×lg2/lg(Nt/N0), where t is the time of continuous culture, Nt is the final number of cells, and N0 is the initial number of cells.

Cell viability and in vitro drug sensitivity assay

Cell viability was evaluated by the 3-(4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The chemotherapeutic drugs, Dex, L-Asp, VCR, DNR, Ara-C and MTX, were purchased from Sigma. Cells were cultured in the presence of 6 different concentrations of Dex (0.0001–0.1 μM or 0.01–5 μM), L-Asp (0.001–1 U/ml or 0.01–500 U/ml), VCR (0.1–0.6 nM or 0.2–1.2 nM), DNR (1–50 nM), Ara-C (5–100 nM or 50–800 nM) and MTX (2–20 nM or 5–50 nM) for 48 h, respectively, followed by assessment of cell viability by MTT assay. Drug sensitivity was assessed by the IC50, drug concentration that inhibits 50% of cell viability. The IC50 was calculated by linear interpolation.

Cell cycle analysis

For each analysis, 106 cells were harvested and fixed overnight in 70% ethanol at 4 °C. The cells were then washed and stained with 5 μg/ml PI in the presence of DNAse-free RNAse (Sigma). After 30 min at room temperature, the cells were analyzed via flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL, USA) with the acquisition of 30,000 events.

Animal experiments

Cultured 1 × 107 HXEX-ALL1 cells were subcutaneously injected into the right flanks of 6-week-old female BALB/c (nu/nu) nude mice, with 0.2 ml of PBS injected into the left flanks as the control (n = 6). Tumor size was measured by calipers every 2 days. The approximate tumor volume was calculated using the equation V = (length × width × depth)/2. All animal care was in compliance with the guidelines established by the internal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Ethics Committee of Sichuan University. After the mice were euthanized, the tumor mass was excised, fixed in 10% formalin, and routinely processed for paraffin embedding. Five-millimeter-thick sections were obtained and prepared for standard histopathological examination.

Statistical analysis

All assays were performed in triplicate, and the data were expressed as the mean value ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to compare two groups. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Establishment of the HXEX-ALL1 cell line

A stable and prominent cell population was observed following 8 weeks of culture of primary BM mononuclear cells. The cells were maintained in fresh medium (RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS) replaced at 2- to 3-days intervals. The obtained cells were designated HXEX-ALL1 and made available. The HXEX-ALL1 cells had been in culture for 18 months. The Doubling time (Td) was 26–32 h. The cells proliferated consistently and were negative for EBV, HCMV, HBV, HCV, HIV, and mycoplasma infection based on PCR. The cells could be frozen under standard conditions using 60% RPMI-1640 medium, 30% FBS and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and successfully revived after storage in liquid nitrogen, with more than 80% viability. The cells maintained the same properties after freezing and thawing.

Morphological characteristics of HXEX-ALL1 cells

The HXEX-ALL1 cells grew in suspension as single cells or clumps resembled the morphology of lymphoblastic leukemia cells in the patient’s BM smear at diagnosis and second relapse (Fig. 1a, b). The cells were usually round in shape, and the cytoplasm was weakly basophilic with occasional vacuoles; most cells contained only one nucleus that was commonly round; the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio of these cells was high (Fig. 1c). Mitotic figures were usually observed. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that most cells had a single, large and eccentric nucleus with a fine chromatin network. Few organelles were present in the cytoplasm, except for some mitochondria and ribosomes (Fig. 1d).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Morphological characteristics of HXEX-ALL1 cells. Wright-Giemsa staining of primary leukemia cells in the BM of the patient. a At diagnosis (×1000 magnification) and b at second relapse (×1000 magnification). c Wright-Giemsa staining of HXEX-ALL1 cells (×1000 magnification). d Ultrastructural appearance of HXEX-ALL1 cells (×8000 magnification)

Immunophenotype of HXEX-ALL1 cells

The immunophenotypes of HXEX-ALL1 cells and primary leukemia cells from the patient were virtually identical. The HXEX-ALL1 cells were positive for CD10, CD19, CD22, cCD79α and HLA-DR, partially positive for CD5, and negative for CD20, cIgM, sIgM, CD2, CD3, CD7, cCD3, CD34 and myeloid-, natural killer (NK) cell- and plasmocyte-associated markers. The cells exhibited a common B immunophenotype according to the EGIL classification [18].

Gross chromosomal alterations in HXEX-ALL1 cells

Chromosomal analysis was carried out using the G-banding technique and demonstrated the following karyotype for primary leukemia cells: 47, XY, +8, del(9p22), del(17p12) (Fig. 2a). Because of the failure of G-banding analysis in HXEX-ALL1 cells, CMA was performed after 10 months of culture. The results indicated a gain of chromosome 8, a 38.56-Mb loss of 9p24.3-p13.1 and a 16-Mb loss of 17p13.3-p11 in all HXEX-ALL1 cells (Fig. 2b), consistent with the results of whole genome sequencing. Therefore, the karyotypes of the HXEX-ALL1 cells and primary leukemia cells from the patient were virtually identical. The protein expression levels of p16 ARF, p14 INK4A and Pax5, encoded by the corresponding genes located on chromosome 9p, were low in HXEX-ALL1 cells (Fig. 2c).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Cytogenetic analysis of primary leukemia cells and HXEX-ALL1 cells. a G-banding karyotype of primary leukemia cells. The karyotype according to ISCN (2013) can be described as 47, XY, +8, del(9)(p22), del(17)(p12). Arrows indicate +8, del(9)(p22) and del(17)(p12). b CMA of HXEX-ALL1 cells. Arrows indicate the gain of the whole chromosome 8, a 38.56-Mb loss of 9p24.3-p13.1 and a 16-Mb loss of 17p13.3-p11 in all cells. c Cells were lysed, and extracts were analyzed by western blotting for p16 ARF, p14 INK4A and Pax5. β-Actin was used as an internal control. Bar graphs show the ratio of protein to β-Actin. Experiments were performed in triplicate

Ig/TCR rearrangements in HXEX-ALL1 cells

Ig/TCR gene rearrangements analysis showed that the HXEX-ALL1 cells harbored the following rearrangements: IgVH-A (FR1-JH), IgVH-B (FR2-JH), IgVH-C (FR3-JH), IgDH-A (DH1-6-JH), IgDH-B (DH7-JH), TCRG A and TCRD.

Identity verification of HXEX-ALL1 cells

Using a multiplex STR system, which enables the detection of unique DNA fingerprints through the genotyping of 22 STR loci, the primary leukemia cells and HXEX-ALL1 cells were found to share 100% identity. These results confirmed that the genetic source of HXEX-ALL1 cells was, in fact, the patient’s leukemia cells (Table 1). The HXEX-ALL1 cell line profile did not match any other cell line profile in the current databases from ATCC, DSMZ or elsewhere.
Table 1

STR analysis of HXEX-ALL1 cells, primary leukemia cells and cells from the tumor mass

 

HXEX-ALL1 cells

Primary leukemia cells

Tumor cells

Amelogenin

X, Y

X, Y

X, Y

CSF1PO

11, 13

11, 13

11, 13

D13S317

11, 11

11, 11

11, 11

D16S539

10, 11

10, 11

10, 11

D5S818

7, 10

7, 10

7, 10

D7S820

10, 12

10, 12

10, 12

TH01

9, 9

9, 9

9, 9

TPOX

8, 9

8, 9

8, 9

vWA

16, 17

16, 17

16, 17

Penta E

5, 19

5, 19

5, 19

Penta D

9, 11

9, 11

9, 11

D2S441

11, 11.3

11, 11.3

11, 11.3

D2S1338

18, 24

18, 24

18, 24

D3S1358

15, 15

15, 15

15, 15

D6S1043

12, 19

12, 19

12, 19

D8S1179

13, 15

13, 15

13, 15

D10S1248

13, 14

13, 14

13, 14

D12S391

18, 20

18, 20

18, 20

D18S51

13, 23

13, 23

13, 23

D19S433

14, 15

14, 15

14, 15

D21S11

29, 33

29, 33

29, 33

FGA

24, 26

24, 26

24, 26

Proliferation of HXEX-ALL1 cells

We determined the proliferation for 8 days at different cell Population doubling levels (PDLs) of HXEX-ALL1 cells (Fig. 3a). The results revealed that HXEX-ALL1 cells stably proliferated in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS with a population Td of 26–32 h. The percentage of cells in G0/G1, G2/M and S phase were similar without significant differences (P > 0.05) at different PDLs (Fig. 3b), suggesting that the HXEX-ALL1 cells could stably maintain the cell division cycle during continuous culture in vitro.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Stable proliferation and division cycle of HXEX-ALL1 cells at different PDLs. a Growth curves of HXEX-ALL1 cells at 30, 90 and 180 PDLs. Cells were cultured in a 6-well culture plate at 6 × 105/ml in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS and grown for 8 days. Viable cells were counted using trypan blue staining every day. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assays. Experiments were performed in triplicate. b Cell cycle distribution of HXEX-ALL1 cells at 30, 90 and 180 PDLs. Cells were cultured in a 6-well culture plate at 3 × 105/ml, and cell cycle progression was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h. Experiments were performed in triplicate. The data was analyzed with the MultiCycle Software for Windows (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA). The percentage of cells in G0/G1, G2/M and S phase was not significantly different (P > 0.05) among different PDLs

In vitro drug sensitivity of HXEX-ALL1 cells

HXEX-ALL1 cell line was constructed from a relapsed BCP-ALL patient, and might be resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs. The cell lines, HXEX-ALL1, NALM-6 (BCP-ALL) and CCRF-CEM (TCP-ALL), were tested for their sensitivity to the 6 drugs most commonly used in the treatment of pediatric ALL. The results showed that HXEX-ALL1 cells were sensitive to Dex and VCR (Fig. 4a, b). Compared to NALM-6, HXEX-ALL1 were resistant to DNR (2.3 fold) (Fig. 4c), MTX (4.1 fold) (Fig. 4d), Ara-c (14.2 fold) (Fig. 4e), and highly resistant to L-Asp (> 409.8 fold) (Fig. 4f).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Drug sensitivity of HXEX-ALL1 cells. a–f IC50 of HXEX-ALL1, NALM-7 and CCRF-CEM cells to Dex, VCR, DNR, MTX, Ara-c, and L-Asp. Cells were cultured with increasing concentrations of different drugs for 48 h. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assays. The IC50 values were calculated by linear interpolation. Experiments were performed in triplicate

WGS data of HXEX-ALL1 cells

The WGS analysis resulted in a mean of 2,359,620,422 clean reads. There were 3,357,771 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 847,741 insertion/deletions (InDels), 3093 copy number variations (CNVs) and 6896 structural variations (SVs). Among them, 27,006 SNPs and 193,951 InDels were novel when compared with dbSNP and the 1000 Genomes Project databases.

The tumorigenicity of HXEX-ALL1 cells

To determine the tumorigenicity of HXEX-ALL1 cells, we subcutaneously injected 1 × 107 cells into female BALB/c (nu/nu) nude mice (n = 6). After 25 days, subcutaneous tumors were observed in 3 mice, with a mean volume of 497.1 ± 111.5 mm3 (n = 3) (Fig. 5a, b). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining indicated that the tumor masses were composed of leukemia cells (Fig. 5c). The results of STR analysis indicated that subcutaneous tumors were derived from HXEX-ALL1 cells (Table 1).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Tumorigenicity of HXEX-ALL1 cells. a Subcutaneous tumor mass in nude mice (arrow indicated). b The growth curve of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice (n = 3, age 5–6 weeks). All animal procedures were carried out in accordance with the guidelines established by the internal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Ethics Committee guidelines of Sichuan University. c HE staining of the tumor showed that the tumor mass was composed of leukemia cells and blood vessels. Original magnification: ×200 magnification

Discussion

Improvements in the prognosis of childhood ALL represent one of the most successful stories in modern medicine. Moreover, this improvement has taken place not only in developed countries but also in developing countries because conventional chemotherapy is inexpensive and readily available worldwide [12–14]. The major reason for the improvement in prognosis is the reduction in the risk of relapse as a result of risk-directed chemotherapy [12–14]. However, the management of relapsed and refractory ALL is still difficult due to chemoresistance. Despite efforts to intensify re-induction strategies, including allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the Overall survival (OS) rates for patients with relapsed ALL remain between 25 and 40%, highlighting the need for researches on new promising drugs, such as immunotherapeutic agents [19]. However, the mechanisms underlying ALL progression, relapse and resistance remain elusive. Thus, the establishment of new cell lines derived from patients who are refractory to contemporary chemotherapy would facilitate the elucidation of the biological properties of relapsed and refractory ALL and development of novel therapeutic strategies. However, the establishment of a hematopoietic malignancy cell line from the BM is still challenging.

Currently, there are 637 characterized leukemia-lymphoma cell lines, and among them only 4 are from China. The majority of these cell lines were established from 1977 to 1997 [3]. Contemporary chemotherapeutic protocols have improved the cure rate of pediatric ALL to nearly 90% in the last 2 decades [9–14]. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, there are no cell lines derived from patients who are resistant to contemporary chemotherapeutic protocols, highlighting the need for novel cell lines derived from relapsed and refractory patients. Fortunately, we established a novel cell line, HXEX-ALL1, from a Chinese boy of Han ancestry with a second relapse of BCP-ALL. All major features of the HXEX-ALL1 cell line are summarized in Table 2. As authenticated by the morphologic, immunologic, cytogenetic and STR analyses, the HXEX-ALL1 cells are derived from the patient’s primary leukemia cells. Thus far, the HXEX-ALL1 cell line has been continuously grown in culture for over 18 months (over 400 PDL) with a Td of 26–32 h and has maintained stable proliferation and cytogenetic features. Therefore, the HXEX-ALL1 cells are representative of patient leukemia cells. More importantly, compared with the other BCP-ALL cell lines in use [20, 21], the HXEX-ALL1 cells have a special karyotype represented by trisomy 8 and 9p and 17p deletions and display a multidrug resistant phenotype with highly resistant to L-Asp. Moreover, WGS data showed that there were 27,006 novel SNPs and 193,951 novel InDels in HXEX-ALL1 cells.
Table 2

Summary of HXEX-ALL1 cell features

Feature

HXEX-ALL1 cells

Clinical characteristics

 Patient

6-year-old male

 Diagnosis

BCP-ALL

 Treatment status

At second relapse

 Specimen site

Bone marrow

 Year of establishment

2017

Cell culture characteristics

 Culture medium

90% RPMI-1640 + 10% FBS

 Growth pattern

Suspension as single cells or clumps

 Doubling time

26–32 h

 Subculture

1:4

 Maximum cell density

10 × 106 cells/ml

 Optimal cell density

1 ~ 3×106 cells/ml

 Cryoperservation

60% RPMI-1640 + 30% FBS + 10% DMSO

 Morphology

Medium-sized spheroid morphology

 Viral status

Negative for EBV, HCMV, HBV, and HIV

 Contamination

Negative for mycoplasma

 Authentication

Yes (by STR analysis, cytogenetic analysis, and immunoprofiling)

Immunophenotypic characteristics

 B cell

CD10+, CD19+, CD22+, cCD79α+, CD20−, cIgM−, sIgM−

 T cell

CD2−, CD3−, CD5+, CD7−, cCD3−

 Myelocytic

CD13−, CD33−, CD117−

 Progenitor

CD34−, HLA-DR+

Ig/TCR rearrangements

IgVH-A, IgVH-B, IgVH-C, IgDH-A, IgDH-B, TCRG A and TCRD rearrangements

Gross chromosomal alterations

 CMA

47, XY, +8, del(9p24.3-p13.1), del(17p13.3-p11)

Drug sensitivity

Sensitive to Dex and VCR

Resistant to DNR, MTX, Ara-c

Highly resistant to L-Asp

Functional characteristics

 Clonality

Yes

 Tumorigenicity in nude mice

Tumor masses in 3/6 nude mice

Gross chromosomal alterations are a hallmark of ALL [22]. Cytogenetic risk is used to classify patients into low-, intermediate- or high-risk groups. As defined by the suggestion of the Subspecialty Group of Pediatric Hematology, of Chinese Medical Association (2014), patients with a Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome (encoding the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene) and MLL rearrangements are classified into the high-risk group, patients with E2A-PBX1 rearrangements in the intermediate-risk group, and other patients into the low-risk group [23]. The list of genetic alterations in childhood ALL that are associated with the risk of relapse continues to grow. Ph chromosome, BCR-ABL1 like with IZKF1 and JAK2 alterations, MLL rearrangements, hypodiploidy (< 44 chromosomes or DNA index < 0.81), and iAMP are assigned as unfavorable characteristics [24]. In contrast, hyperdiploidy with trisomy 4 and 10 and ETV6-RUNX1 fusion are designated favorable genetic factors [24]. The results of G-banding analysis in the patient showed that the primary leukemia cells had 3 gross structural chromosomal abnormalities, namely, trisomy 8, and 9p and 17p deletions, but no unfavorable characteristics at diagnosis. The patient was classified into the low-risk group at initial CR. Unfortunately, the patient experienced relapse 4 months after the CR and achieved a second CR after re-induction chemotherapy but then relapsed again after 3 months.

A CK with ≥ 3 structural chromosomal abnormalities is not listed among the criteria of risk classification for childhood ALL. However, a CK with ≥ 4 structural chromosomal abnormalities is predictive of poor outcomes in adult AML patients without favorable or adverse aberrations [25]. A study of 428 adult patients with Ph-negative ALL demonstrated that a CK is an adverse prognostic factor independent of the MRD status, but the definition of CK should include ≥ 5 chromosomal abnormalities [26]. The MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993 study enrolled 1522 adult patients with ALL and demonstrated that patients with a CK comprising ≥ 5 chromosomal abnormalities had an inferior prognosis [27]. A study of 79 pediatric patients with ALL indicated that a CK with ≥ 3 chromosomal abnormalities should be considered a poor prognostic factor in childhood ALL [28]. Nevertheless, the poor prognosis associated with CK remains controversial; some other studies have indicated that a CK does not have a significant impact on either OS or event-free survival in ALL [29–31].

Additionally, deletion of 17p, a segment containing the TP53 gene, is an independent risk factor in adult patients with AML and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [25, 32, 33]. In adult ALL, abnormal 17 alterations including 17p deletions may be a risk factor in T cell precursor ALL (TCP-ALL) [34, 35] but not in BCP-ALL [27]. In childhood BCP-ALL, 17p deletions predict a poor prognosis and a higher rate of relapse in patients without abnormalities in ETV6–RUNX1 or hyperdiploidy [36].

Deletion of 9p is a common chromosomal alteration detected since 1983 [37]. Chromosome 9p contains numerous tumor-associated genes, such as PAX5 at 9p13.2, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, MTAP, IFN, MLLT3, PTPLAD2 at 9p21.3, and JAK2 at 9p24.1 [38, 39]. However, the impact of 9p deletions on ALL outcomes is contradictory. Deletion of 9p is associated with favorable prognosis in adult patients with Ph-negative ALL [27] and unfavorable prognosis in patients with Ph-positive ALL [40]. In childhood ALL, some studies have shown that 9p deletions have no association with outcomes [36, 41, 42]. In contrast, other studies have indicated that 9p deletions predict poor prognoses and risk of relapse in both BCP- and TCP-ALL [43–46]. A recent study on relapsed childhood ALL indicated that 9p deletions are associated with relapse [47]. In the refined risk classification of childhood ALL, favorable genetic features include ETV6-RUNX1, hyperdiploidy, lack of deletion of IKZF1, CNKN2A/B, PAR1, BTG1, EBF1, PAX5, ETV6 or RB1, isolated deletions affecting ETV6/PAX5/BTG1, and deletions of ETV6 with an additional deletion of BTG1/PAX5/CDKN2A/B; other genetic features are classified as risk factors [48]. PAX5 and CDKN2A/B genes are located on chromosome 9p. The protein expression levels of Pax5, p16 ARF and p14 INK4A, encoded by PAX5 and CDKN2A/B genes, were low in HXEX-ALL1 cells compared with the NALM-6 and Raji cells. Most recently, novel subtypes of ALL based on diverse PAX5 alternation, including PAX5alt, PAX5 p.Pro80Arg, or PAX5-plus, were reported [49–51]. PAX5-plus patients, with PAX5 p.Pro80Arg as hotspot and biallelic genomic alterations, had a favorable treatment outcome in trials of population-based German study cohorts [50]. In contrast, the outcome for PAX5 p.Pro80Arg in children treated on St. Jude Total Therapy protocols was unfavorable [49]. PAX5alt patients, with homozygous or heterozygous PAX5 alterations, including rearrangements, sequence mutations and focal intragenic amplifications, had an intermediate outcome in the Children’s Oncology Group AALL0232 study [49]. In this study, PAX5 p.Pro80Arg patients had an intermediate outcome also [49]. Therefore, 9p deletion might play a complex and paradoxical role in relapsed ALL patients.

Trisomy 8 is reported in 10–15% of adult AML patients, 9–12% of adult ALL, and 2–10% of childhood ALL, mainly as a part of hyperdiploid karyotypes or CKs with structural abnormalities [25, 26, 52, 53]. The prognosis of AML patients with trisomy 8 depends on whether it occurs as an isolated abnormality or is accompanied by other aberrations [54]. Trisomy 8 alone had no significant impact on the prognosis of adult ALL [27]. However, the relationship between trisomy 8 and prognosis in childhood ALL is still unknown [54]. Increased attention should thus be paid to the impact of CK, trisomy 8, 9p and 17p deletions on the prognosis of ALL.

Furthermore, accompanying with the special karyotype, HXEX-ALL1 cell line shows a multidrug resistant phenotype with resistant to DNR, MTX, Ara-c, and L-Asp. The outstanding characteristic of HXEX-ALL1 is that the IC50 to L-Asp was higher than 100 nM after 48 h treatment, and were 409.8- fold more resistant than NALM-6 cells. Over the past 50 years, Asp has become a key chemotherapeutic agent for ALL and has led to a substantial improvement in cure rates, especially in children [55, 56]. Asp resistance plays a main role in the treatment failure of ALL [56]. The underlying mechanism of ALL cells resistant to Asp remains unclear. However, the researches on Asp resistance are far fewer than the researches on glucocorticoid resistance. One important reason is that there are some glucocorticoid resistant ALL cell model, but few Asp resistant model.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, HXEX-ALL1 is the first BCP-ALL cell line derived from a pediatric patient who relapsed after receiving appropriate contemporary chemotherapy. The novel BCP-ALL cell line resembles the primary leukemia cells at diagnosis. Moreover, the novel cell line has 27,006 novel SNPs and 193,951 novel InDels. Compared with the other BCP-ALL cell lines in use, the HXEX-ALL1 cells have a special karyotype represented by trisomy 8 and 9p and 17p deletions with multi-drug resistant phenotype, especially highly resistant to L-Asp. Thus, HXEX-ALL1 may be a valuable cell model for further investigation on the mechanisms and potential targeted therapy of relapsed/refractory ALL, particularly for those developed a dominantly resistant to Asp. Meanwhile, the HXEX-ALL1 cell line represents a useful model to explore the impact of 9p and 17p deletions on the pathogenesis and prognosis of ALL and to develop new target drugs.

Notes

Abbreviations

ALL: 

acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AML: 

acute myeloid leukemia

BCP-ALL: 

B cell precursor ALL

BM: 

bone marrow

CK: 

complex karyotype

CMA: 

chromosomal microarray analysis

Ig: 

immunoglobulin

PDL: 

population doubling level

TCR: 

T cell receptor

Td: 

doubling time

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

LG designed the research, performed a part of the research, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. YPZ and JG helped to design the research and contributed essential tools. RY contributed essential tools and helped to draft the manuscript. YLZ and GZ performed a part of the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The technical assistance of Yufang Wang and Ji Zhang is gratefully acknowledged.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the father of the patient.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board and Human Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital. This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. The parent of the patient signed an informed consent. All animal care was in compliance with the guidelines established by the internal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Ethics Committee guidelines of Sichuan University.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81270602); Sichuan Science and Technology Program of China (Grant No. 2018JY0044), Chengdu Science and Technology Huimin Project of China (Grant No. 2015-HM01-00307-SF).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
(2)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
(3)
Joint Laboratory of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University and School of Life Science, Fudan University for Pulmonary Development and Disease, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China

References

  1. Harrison RG. Observations on the living developing nerve fiber. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1907;4:140–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Landecker H. Culturing life: how cells became technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Drexler HG, Macleod RA. History of leukemia-lymphoma cell lines. Hum Cell. 2010;23:75–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. MacLeod RAF, Nagel S, Scherr M, Schneider B, Dirks WG, Uphoff CC, et al. Human leukemia and lymphoma cell lines as models and resources. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15:339–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gey G. Tissue culture studies of the proliferative capacity of cervical carcinoma and normal epithelium. Cancer Res. 1952;12:264–5.Google Scholar
  6. Osgood EE, Brooke JH. Continuous tissue culture of leukocytes from human leukemic bloods by application of gradient principles. Blood. 1955;10:1010–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nelsonrees WA, Flandermeyer RR. HeLa cultures defined. Science. 1976;191:96–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pulvertaft JV. Cytology of Burkitt’s tumour (African lymphoma). Lancet. 1964;283:238–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Inaba H, Greaves M, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2013;381:1943–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1541–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pui CH, Pei D, Campana D, Cheng C, Sandlund JT, Bowman WP, et al. A revised definition for cure of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2014;28:2336–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Tai EW, Ward KC, Bonaventure A, Siegel DA, Coleman MP. Survival among children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the United States, by race and age, 2001 to 2009: findings from the CONCORD-2 study. Cancer. 2017;123:5178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pui CH, Yang JJ, Hunger SP, Pieters R, Schrappe M, Biondi A, et al. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: progress through collaboration. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2938–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Starý J, Hrušák O. Recent advances in the management of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. F1000Res. 2016;5:2635.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Cui L, Li ZG, Chai YH, Yu J, Gao J, Zhu XF, et al. Outcome of children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with CCLG-ALL 2008: the first nation-wide prospective multicenter study in China. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:913–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ceppi F, Cazzaniga G, Colombini A, Biondi A, Conter V. Risk factors for relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prediction and prevention. Expert Rev Hematol. 2015;8:57–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Drexler HG, Matsuo Y. Guidelines for the characterization and publication of human malignant hematopoietic cell lines. Leukemia. 1999;13:835–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knapp W, Ludwig WD, Matutes E, Orfao A, et al. Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemia. Leukemia. 1995;9:1783–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pierro J, Hogan LE, Bhatla T, Carroll WL. New targeted therapies for relapsed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17:725–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Matsuo Y, Drexler HG. Establishment and characterization of human B cell precursor-leukemia cell lines. Leuk Res. 1998;22:567–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsuo Y, Drexler HG, Harashima A, Fujii N, Ishimaru F, Orita K. Establishment and characterization of new B-cell precursor leukemia cell line NALM-35. Hum Cell. 2002;15:215–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Redefining ALL classification: toward detecting high-risk ALL and implementing precision medicine. Blood. 2015;125:3977–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Subspecialty Group of Hematology, the Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014;52: 641–4.Google Scholar
  24. Alexander S. Clinically defining and managing high-risk pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014:181–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, Walker H, Chatters S, Goldstone AH, et al. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010;116:354–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Issa GC, Kantarjian HM, Yin CC, Qiao W, Ravandi F, Thomas D, et al. Prognostic impact of pretreatment cytogenetics in adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of minimal residual disease. Cancer. 2017;123:459–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Moorman AV, Harrison CJ, Buck GA, Richards SM, Secker-Walker LM, Martineau M, et al. Karyotype is an independent prognostic factor in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): analysis of cytogenetic data from patients treated on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial. Blood. 2007;109:3189–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Jarosová M, Holzerová M, Mihál V, Lakomá I, Divoký V, Blazek B, et al. Complex karyotypes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic study of 21 cases. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;145:161–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Khoral P, Atenafu EG, Craddock KJ, Schimmer A, Chang H. Prognostic effect of complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype, and chromosome 17 abnormalities in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17:215–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Motlló C, Ribera JM, Morgades M, Granada I, Montesinos P, González-Campos J, et al. Prognostic significance of complex karyotype and monosomal karyotype in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with risk-adapted protocols. Cancer. 2015;120:3958–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Baranger L, Hunault M, Cuccuini W, Lefebvre C, Bidet A, et al. Value of cytogenetic abnormalities in adults with Ph-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2017;130:1832–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Seifert H, Mohr B, Thiede C, Oelschlägel U, Schäkel U, Illmer T, et al. The prognostic impact of 17p (p53) deletion in 2272 adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2009;23:656–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu L, Kim HT, Kasar S, Benien P, Wei D, Hoang K, et al. Survival of Del17p CLL depends on genomic complexity and somatic mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;23:735–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Marks DI, Paietta EM, Moorman AV, Richards SM, Buck G, Dewald G, et al. T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: clinical features, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and outcome from the large randomized prospective trial (UKALL XII/ECOG 2993). Blood. 2009;114:5136–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Movassaghian M, Sohani AR, Mcafee SL, Perry AM, Cin PD, Mclaughlin C, et al. Chromosome 17p deletion in a case of T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:267–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Moorman AV, Ensor HM, Richards SM, Chilton L, Schwab C, Kinsey SE, et al. Prognostic effect of chromosomal abnormalities in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the UK Medical Research Council ALL97/99 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:403–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kowalczyk J, Sandberg AA. A possible subgroup of ALL with 9p. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1983;9:383–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Sarhadi VK, Lahti L, Scheinin I, Tyybäkinoja A, Savola S, Usvasalo A, et al. Targeted resequencing of 9p in acute lymphoblastic leukemia yields concordant results with array CGH and reveals novel genomic alterations. Genomics. 2013;102:182–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Dreyling MH, Bohlander SK, Le BM, Olopade OI. Refined mapping of genomic rearrangements involving the short arm of chromosome 9 in acute lymphoblastic leukemias and other hematologic malignancies. Blood. 1995;86:1931–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pfeifer H, Raum K, Markovic S, Nowak V, Fey S, Obländer J, et al. Genomic CDKN2A/2B deletions in adult Ph + ALL are adverse despite allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2018;131:1464–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Szczepański T, Harrison CJ, van Dongen JJ. Genetic aberrations in paediatric acute leukaemias and implications for management of patients. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:880–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Mirebeau D, Acquaviva C, Suciu S, Bertin R, Dastugue N, Robert A, et al. The prognostic significance of CDKN2A, CDKN2B and MTAP inactivation in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood. Results of the EORTC studies 58881 and 58951. Haematologica. 2006;91:881–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Heerema NA, Sather HN, Sensel MG, Liumares W, Lange BJ, Bostrom BC, et al. Association of chromosome arm 9p abnormalities with adverse risk in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. Blood. 1999;94:1537–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fujita M, Lee HJ, Sugimura T, Okuyama T. Detection of homozygous deletions of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor (p16) gene in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and association with adverse prognostic features. Blood. 1995;85:2685–90.Google Scholar
  45. Calero Moreno TM, Gustafsson G, Garwicz S, Grandér D, Jonmundsson GK, Frost BM, et al. Deletion of the Ink4-locus (the p16ink4a, p14ARF and p15ink4b genes) predicts relapse in children with ALL treated according to the Nordic protocols NOPHO-86 and NOPHO-92. Leukemia. 2002;16:2037–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Diccianni MB, Batova A, Yu J, Vu T, Pullen J, Amylon M, et al. Shortened survival after relapse in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with p16/p15 deletions. Leuk Res. 1997;21:549–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Spinella JF, Richer C, Cassart P, Ouimet M, Healy J, Sinnett D. Mutational dynamics of early and late relapsed childhood ALL: rapid clonal expansion and long-term dormancy. Blood Adv. 2018;2:177–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Moorman AV, Enshaei A, Schwab C, Wade R, Chilton L, Elliott A, et al. A novel integrated cytogenetic and genomic classification refines risk stratification in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2014;124:1434–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Gu Z, Churchman ML, Roberts KG, Moore I, Zhou X, Nakitandwe J, et al. PAX5-driven subtypes of B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2019;51(2):296–307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Bastian L, Schroeder MP, Eckert C, Schlee C, Tanchez JO, Kämpf S, et al. PAX5 biallelic genomic alterations define a novel subgroup of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0430-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Passet M, Boissel N, Sigaux F, Saillard C, Bargetzi M, Ba I, et al. PAX5 P80R mutation identifies a novel subtype of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with favorable outcome. Blood. 2019;133(3):280–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Mrózek K, Heerema NA, Bloomfield CD. Cytogenetics in acute leukemia. Blood Rev. 2004;18:115–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Li X, Li J, Hu Y, Xie W, Du W, Liu W, et al. A comprehensive cytogenetic classification of 1466 Chinese patients with de novo acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res. 2012;36:720–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Schoch C, Haase D, Fonatsch C, Haferlach T, Löffler H, Schlegelberger B, et al. The significance of trisomy 8 in de novo acute myeloid leukaemia: the accompanying chromosome aberrations determine the prognosis. German AML Cooperative Study Group. Br J Haematol. 2010;99:605–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Rytting M. Peg-asparaginase for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10:833–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Kaspers GJ, Veerman AJ, Pieters R, Van Zantwijk CH, Smets LA, Van Wering ER, et al. In vitro cellular drug resistance and prognosis in newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1997;90:2723–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us