Skip to main content
Download PDF

Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological and prognostic significance of miRNA 106b~25 cluster in gastric cancer

Cancer Cell International volume 19, Article number: 200 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

miRNA 106b~25 cluster were demonstrated to be an oncogene. In previous study, we had analyzed the diagnostic significance of miRNA 106b~25 based on its carcinogenesis effect. The significance of miRNA 106b~25 for prognosis of gastric cancer were not researched.

Methods

We applied multivariate analysis of PCA, PLS-DA and Cox Regression for clinicopathological features and survival time to explore the significance of miRNA 106b~25 expression in plasma and cancer tissues for gastric cancer.

Results

The expression of miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 in plasma were positively correlated with their expression in tumor tissues. Via PCA analysis, it was found that miRNA 106b~25 expression in plasma and tumor, T, N and TNM stage were correlated with each other. Via PLS-DA analysis, we identified that T, N and TNM stage were important factors for miRNA 106b~25 expression both in plasma and tumor (all VIP value > 1.2). According to loading weights of variables for the first and second components, it was found that the importance of the miRNA 106b~25s expression carried with the progressed stage of gastric cancer. In the survival analysis, COX regression showed that T stage, plasma miRNA 106b and tumor miRNA 93 were significant risk factors for overall survival [HR: 0.400 (0.205–0.780); P = 0.007; HR: 0.371 (0.142–0.969), P = 0.043; 0.295 (0.134–0.650), P = 0.002].

Conclusion

Plasma and tumor miRNA 106b~25 expression correlated with T, N and TNM stage. Increased miRNA 106b~25 expression was important characters carried with gastric cancer progression. T stage, plasma miRNA106b and tumor miRNA 93 significant risk factors for overall survival.

Background

miRNA 106b~25 cluster were demonstrated to be an oncogene, which promote malignant cell proliferation, migration, invasion as well as tumor angiogenesis [1, 15]. The miRNA 106b~25 polycistronic contain three pre-miRNAs including highly conserved miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 [9]. These three miRNAs are targeted in the intron 13 of 515-bp region of chromosome 7q22 for gene MCM7 and present active transcription in the MCM7 primary RNA transcription [6, 15]. This cluster has been reported to be over-expressed in many cancers, such as esophageal cancer [21], prostate cancer [7, 16], non-small cell lung cancer [17], and hepatic cell cancer [20]. The trigger targets of their oncogenic process involving E2F1 and TGF-β, as well as Retinoblastoma protein (RB) gene, tumor protein 53 (TP53) [23] and phosphatase and tension homolog deleted on chromosome (PTEN) have been demonstrated in regulating mechanism of miRNA 106b~25 [24].

In previous study, the miRNA 106b~25 cluster implement proliferative, anti-apoptotic, cell cycle-promoting proficiency in cell experiments and tumorigenicity in vivo [4, 22]. Petrocca’s study suggests that cancer cells can alternate action mechanisms of miRNA 106b~25 to facilitating cells regeneration and relieving apoptosis [14]. miRNA 106b~25 over-expression increased apoptosis through regulation of the tumor suppressor genes [8]. Furthermore, suppression of miRNA 25, 93 and 106b results in facilitation of G1/S phase transition and decreasing cell cycle G0/G1 phase arrest [8]. Many studies demonstrated that the miRNA 93 also play an important role in enabling angiogenesis in caner [3].

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer related death in the world wide [18]. It had demonstrated that miRNA 106b and miRNA 93 were upregulated in primary tumors and highly expressed in all gastric cancer cell lines [5, 10]. miRNA 106b~25 clusters may take part in tumorigenesis, progression of gastric cancer via negative regulate E2F1, TGF-β pathway [4, 9, 10, 14]. Tumor suppressing gene RB and PTEN and oncogene P21 and Bim [8] also were the direct targets of miRNA 106b~25. So, many studies suggested that the miRNA 106b~25 may be an intrinsic factor of gastric carcinogenesis. In large-scale analysis, the plasma concentrations of miRNA 106b were significantly higher in gastric cancer patients, and significantly decreased in pre-operative serum compared with post-operative serum [13]. In TCGA database, all these three miRNAs were significantly higher expressed in cancer when comparing with normal tissues (Additional file 1: Table S1).

In our vitro study, inhibiting miRNA 106b∼25 cluster via transfecting antisense RNA can influence proliferation, migration, and invasion, G0G1 phase arrest of gastric cancer cells [26]. In clinic, we found that three components of miRNA 106b~25 cluster expressed consistently at a high level both in tumor specimens and plasma, and associated with clinical pathological factors [27]. When comparing the diagnostic efficacy, plasma miRNA 106b was significantly higher diagnostic efficacy than CA724, CA242 and CA199 [2], the diagnostic efficacies of miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 were significantly higher than CA199 [11]. However, the significance of miRNA 106b~25 for prognosis of gastric cancer were not researched. As well as in TCGA data base (Additional file 1: Table S1), the survival significance was not observed due to many studies lacking survival data. In this study, we examined 60 gastric patients’ miRNA 106b~25 expression level in plasma and cancer tissues. Then analyzed the association between miRNA 106b~25 expression and clinicopathological features and overall survival of gastric cancer patients after 5-years following-up.

Methods

Patients

We collected 60 gastric cancer tissues samples from March to May in 2013 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, each one paired with non-tumor gastric tissue(at least 5 cm away from the edge of tumor, and there was no tumor cell confirmed by a pathologist [25, 30]) and perioperative peripheral blood sample from the same patient. Inclusive criteria were: (1) gastric cancer patients received radical resection for stomach tumor. (2) all histological diagnosis was confirmed as gastric adenocarcinoma. All clinical data were analyzed according to the 8th stomach cancer tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging classification of the Union of International Control Cancer (UICC) [28]. (3) all patients had not received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before collecting samples. (4) all patients had not chronic disease or infectious diseases or history of other malignancy.

Informed consent was taken from every subject, and the Human Research Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University approved all aspects of this study.

Samples

All tissues samples were preserved in liquid nitrogen after removal from human body. Blood samples were obtained immediately following diagnosis and prior to any oncological treatment. The peripheral blood (5 mL) samples were collected into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) anticoagulative tubes immediately. After collection, the blood samples were subjected for isolation of cell-free nucleic acids by using a three-spin protocol (2000g for 30 min, 4000g for 5 min, 8000g for 5 min) to prevent contamination from cellular nucleic acids.

RNA extraction and detection of miRNAs

Total RNA of tissues was extracted by using Trizol (Invitrogen, USA); Plasma RNA was extracted by using acid phenol according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was quantified by microfluidics analysis (Gene Quant, Switzerland). The amounts of miRNAs were quantified in duplicate by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using the human TaqMan MicroRNA Assay Kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). After the reverse transcription reaction which was carried out with TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems), cDNA solution was amplified using TaqMan Universal PCR Master MixII with no Amp Erase UNG (Applied Biosystems). RT-PCR was run on 7500 Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems), and the cycle threshold (Ct) values were calculated with the SDS 1.4 software (Applied Biosystems). All reactions were performed in triplicate.

Through the 2−ΔΔCt method, expressions of miRNAs by U6, while the expressions of miRNAs from tissues samples were normalized by miRNA 39 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Ct was calculated by subtracting the Ct values of reference substance from the Ct values of the interesting miRNAs. Mean Ct and standard deviation values were calculated without outliers (i.e., replicates with Ct differing by more than one cycle from the median). The ΔΔCt was then calculated by subtracting ΔCt of the median of control samples from ΔCt of study group. Fold change was calculated by the equation 2−ΔΔCt [24]. Then, we used division calculation to achieve the 2−ΔΔCt multiple between gastric cancer tissues and one to one correspondence adjacent non-tumorous tissues.

Statistical methods

Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software package (version 16.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Two-tailed P-values of less than 0.05 were considered to statistically significant difference. Continuous variable was described by median and mean ± standard deviation (\(\bar{x} \pm {\text{s}}\)). Independent sample t test was used in comparison of continuous variables. The Chi squared and Fisher exact tests were applied in categorical variable for univariate analysis.

All clinical features were set as variable X to establish the matrix. Then SIMCA-P 13.0 (Umea, Sweden) was applied in matrix analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for profile analysis; meanwhile, partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to confirm the significant variable for the categories. Loading plot and Variable Importance for the Projection (VIP) was used to determine the significant important variable for the miRNA 106b~25 (VIP > 1.2) [7].

Results

Expression of miRNA106b~25 in plasma and cancer tissues in gastric cancer

Figure 1a–c showed sequence diagram of the fold change of plasma miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25, which set the fold change of “1” as cutting line. The median fold change of plasma miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 were 2.465, 2.305 and 2.145, respectively, the mean fold change of plasma miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 were 2.457 ± 0.856, 2.3512 ± 0.796, 2.162 ± 0.846 (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The expression of plasma and tumor miRNA 106b~25 in gastric cancer. a–c showed sequence diagram of the fold change of plasma miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 expression. d, e Sequence diagram of the fold change of miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 expression in tumor tissues. g–i Correlation analysis of plasma and tumor tissues miRNA106b~25

Full size image
Table 1 The summary of clinicopathological features and miRNA106b~25 of gastric cancer patients
Full size table

Then, we determined the levels of miRNA 106b, miRNA 25 and miRNA 93 relative to the paired normal tissues. Figure 1d–f showed sequence diagram of the fold change relative to adjacent non-tumorous tissues. The median fold change of tumor miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 were 2.430, 2.880, 2.165, respectively, which was significantly increased expression. The mean fold change of tumor miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 were 2.516 ± 0.971, 2.885 ± 0.785, 2.275 ± 0.867.

Figure 1g–i showed the correlation analysis of plasma and tumor miRNA106b~25, the plasma miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 were positive correlated to tumor expression, respectively (r2= 0.571, P < 0.01; r2= 0.668, P < 0.01; r2= 0.691, P < 0.01).

The multivariate analysis of the correlation between miRNA106b~25 and clinicopathological features

Clinicopathological features and miRNA 106b~25 expressions were set as variable X to establish the matrix for PCA analysis. As shown in Fig. 2a, b of loading plot and score scatter, Principal component 1 (PC1) and PC2 explained 54.1% and 44.2% variation, the total of 99.3% variation were explained by these two-PCs. Loading plot shows how the X-variables vary in relation to each other, variables near each other are positively correlated, variables symmetric about the origin to each other are negatively correlated, the variables situated at 90 degrees from each other are almost uncorrelated in these 2 components. Thus, the plasma and tumor miRNA 106b~25 expression, T stage, N stage, TNM stage were correlated each other.

Fig. 2
figure 2

PCA analysis for clinicopathological features and miRNA 106b~25 in gastric cancer. a, b Loading plot and score scatter in PCA analysis. c–e 3D score plot according to T stage, N stage, TNM stage in PCA, Blue: T1 + T2, N0, TNM I + II stage, respectively; Red: T3 + T4, N1–N3, III + IV stage, respectively

Full size image

Clinicopathological features were set as variable X to establish the matrix for PLS-DA analysis. The explain rate of first two PCs, t1 and t2 was 43.4% and 54.4%, respectively. In PLS-DA analysis, X-variables with large w*’s (positive or negative) are highly correlated with miRNA 106b~25 expression (Y). These variables with large w*’s are situated far away from the origin (on the positive or negative side) on the plot (Fig. 3a, b). Thus, T stage, N stage, TNM stage were correlated with plasma and tumor miRNA 106b~25 expression. We also identified that T stage, N stage, TNM stage were important factors to plasma and tumor miRNA 106b~25 expression via VIP(VIP value = 1.67482, VIP value = 1.31006, VIP value = 1.51526, Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

PLS-DA analysis for clinicopathological features and miRNA 106b~25 in gastric cancer. a, b loading plot and score scatter in PLS-DA analysis. c VIP value of clinicopathological features for miRNA 106b~25 expression. d–f 3D score plot according to T stage, N stage, TNM stage in PLS-DA, Blue: T1 + T2, N0, TNM I + II stage, respectively; Red: T3 + T4, N1–N3, III + IV stage, respectively

Full size image

Both PCA and PLS-DA score plot (Figs. 2c–e, 3d–f) showed that all point can be disguised by T stage, N stage, TNM stage. T3–T4 stage, N1–N3 stage, III-IV stage distributed on the right, while T1–T2 stage, N0 stage, I–II stage distributed on the left according to their first and second PCs loading weight. However, such PCs are mainly correlated to the TNM stage, tumor and plasma miRNA 106b, tumor miRNA 93, tumor miRNA 25 (loading weights > 0.3, first component), T stage and plasma miRNA25 (loading weights > 0.3, second component) in PCA analysis. In PLS-DA analysis, first component is mainly correlated to the N stage, TNM stage, T stage, tumor miRNA106b, miRNA 25 and miRNA93 (loading weights > 0.4), second component are mainly correlated to N stage, tumor miRNA25, tumor miRNA93 (loading weights > 0.3, shown in Table 2). This result confirms the importance of the miRNAs 106b~25 expression carried with the progressed stage of gastric cancer.

Table 2 Loading weights of all variables for the first and second components in PCA and PLS-DA analysis
Full size table

Prognostic analysis

In the survival analysis, tumor size (P < 0.01), T stage (P = 0.015), N stage (P < 0.01), TNM stage (P < 0.01), plasma miRNA 106b (P < 0.001), plasma miRNA 93 (P = 0.004), plasma miRNA25 (P = 0.029), tumor miRNA 106b (P < 0.001), tumor miRNA 93 (P = 0.002), tumor miRNA25 (P = 0.002), was significantly correlated with OS (Fig. 4). The survival rates based on clinicopathological features and miRNA 106b~25 were list in Table 3. In Table 4, we used COX regression to get adjusted hazard ratios for prognosis. T stage, plasma miRNA 106b and tumor miRNA 93 are significant risk factors for overall survival [HR: 0.400 (0.205–0.780); P = 0.007; HR: 0.371 (0.142–0.969), P = 0.043; 0.295 (0.134–0.650), P = 0.002].

Fig. 4
figure 4

The survival curves according to plasma and tumor miRNA106b~25 of gastric cancer patients

Full size image
Table 3 1,3 and 5 year-survival rate of gastric cancer patients according to clinicopathological features and miRNA 106b~25
Full size table
Table 4 Multivariate COX regression for prognostic features of gastric cancer patients
Full size table

Discussion

Increasing studies has showed that miRNA 106b~25 cluster plays oncogenic roles in malignant disease. miRNA 106b~25 has been reported to be up-regulated in several cancers, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [21], breast cancer [19], hepatocellular carcinoma [20] et al. The regulation targets of miRNA 106b~25 involving E2F1 and TGF-β, RB, TP53 [23], PTEN [24] et al. All these targets play crucial role as an intrinsic factor of gastric carcinogenesis. In our previous studies, we had demonstrated expression of miRNA 106b, miRNA 93 and miRNA 25 were significantly higher in gastric cancer cell lines [26], tumor tissues and plasma form gastric cancer patients [27]. In this study, we analyzed the significance of miRNA106b~25 on clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer patients via multivariate analysis.

Multivariate analysis is able to perform trade studies across multiple dimensions whereas taking into account the effects of all variables on the responses of interest, as well as clinical and pathological features and miRNAs expression in this study, and in purpose of extract the important variable for the classification. PCA is a technique of data dimensionality reduction [29]. It contains a series of mathematical procedure which transforms a range of correlated variables into a (smaller) number of uncorrelated variables defined PCs, thus PCs is integrated to extract the main information of data sets. Scattered plots of PCA can show the biological alterations behind the data sets appropriately. The high coincidence of PCs and similarities in PC element could be achieved indifferent samples within similar pathological or pathophysiological status, so as to, these coincident constituents is in similar location in PCA scattered plots. In this study, scattered plots showed that the plasma and tumor miRNA 106b~25 expression, T stage, N stage, TNM stage were in similar location and correlated with each other.

PCA is a foundation for the algorithm of PLS-DA. PLS-DA is a partial least squares regression of binary variables, which can analyze the categories of a categorical variable (X) for predictor variables (Y). It is an coordination among the usual discriminant analysis and a discriminant analysis based on the significant PCs for the Y variables [12]. We used VIP and loading plots of PLS-DA analysis to identify the important X variables for the miRNA 106b~25s, it was showed that T stage, N stage, TNM stage were important factors to plasma and tumor miRNA 106b~25 expression.

In prognostic analyze, we used Kaplan–Meier analysis to prognostic univariate analysis. The Cox regression (or proportional hazards regression) is a statistical approach for investigating the effect of several variables upon the time a specified event takes to happen. In the context of an outcome such as death or disease progression this is known as Cox regression for survival analysis. The unique effect of a unit increase in a covariate is multiplicative with respect to the hazard rate. In this study, the cox regression showed that T stage, plasma miRNA 106b and tumor miRNA 93 significant risk factors for overall survival, the HR was 0.400, 0.371,0.295, respectively.

Conclusion

miRNA 106b~25 expression in plasma and tumor correlated with T stage, N stage, TNM stage. miRNA 106b~25s expression increasing was important characters carried in the progressing stage of gastric cancer. T stage, plasma miRNA 106b and tumor miRNA 93 significant risk factors for overall survival.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Brett JO, Renault VM, Rafalski VA, Webb AE, Brunet A. The microRNA cluster miR-106b~25 regulates adult neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation. Aging. 2011;3(2):108–24. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen XZ, Zhang WK, Yang K, Wang LL, Liu J, Wang L, Hu JK, Zhang B, Chen ZX, Chen JP, Zhou ZG, Mo XM. Correlation between serum CA724 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(9):9031–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-1774-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fang L, Deng Z, Shatseva T, Yang J, Peng C, Du WW, Yee AJ, Ang LC, He C, Shan SW, Yang BB. MicroRNA miR-93 promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis by targeting integrin-beta8. Oncogene. 2011;30(7):806–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guarnieri AL, Towers CG, Drasin DJ, Oliphant M, Andrysik Z, Hotz TJ, Vartuli RL, Linklater ES, Pandey A, Khanal S, Espinosa JM, Ford HL. The miR-106b-25 cluster mediates breast tumor initiation through activation of NOTCH1 via direct repression of NEDD4L. Oncogene. 2018;37(28):3879–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0239-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo J, Miao Y, Xiao B, Huan R, Jiang Z, Meng D, Wang Y. Differential expression of microRNA species in human gastric cancer versus non-tumorous tissues. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(4):652–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05666.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haldar S, Roy A, Banerjee S. Differential regulation of MCM7 and its intronic miRNA cluster miR-106b-25 during megakaryopoiesis induced polyploidy. RNA Biol. 2014;11(9):1137–47. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.36136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hudson RS, Yi M, Esposito D, Glynn SA, Starks AM, Yang Y, Schetter AJ, Watkins SK, Hurwitz AA, Dorsey TH, Stephens RM, Croce CM, Ambs S. MicroRNA-106b-25 cluster expression is associated with early disease recurrence and targets caspase-7 and focal adhesion in human prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32(35):4139–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kan T, Sato F, Ito T, Matsumura N, David S, Cheng Y, Agarwal R, Paun BC, Jin Z, Olaru AV, Selaru FM, Hamilton JP, Yang J, Abraham JM, Mori Y, Meltzer SJ. The miR-106b-25 polycistron, activated by genomic amplification, functions as an oncogene by suppressing p21 and Bim. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(5):1689–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khuu C, Utheim TP, Sehic A. The three paralogous microRNA clusters in development and disease, miR-17-92, miR-106a-363, and miR-106b-25. Scientifica. 2016;2016:1379643. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1379643.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim YK, Yu J, Han TS, Park SY, Namkoong B, Kim DH, Hur K, Yoo MW, Lee HJ, Yang HK, Kim VN. Functional links between clustered microRNAs: suppression of cell-cycle inhibitors by microRNA clusters in gastric cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(5):1672–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li F, Guo Y, Liu J, Zhang R. The significance of elevated plasma expression of microRNA 106b~25 clusters in gastric cancer. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e178427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li X, Gill R, Cooper NG, Yoo JK, Datta S. Modeling microRNA-mRNA interactions using PLS regression in human colon cancer. BMC Med Genomics. 2011;4:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-4-44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mirzaei H, Khataminfar S, Mohammadparast S, Sales SS, Maftouh M, Mohammadi M, Simonian M, Parizadeh SM, Hassanian SM, Avan A. Circulating microRNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. Curr Med Chem. 2016;23(36):4135–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petrocca F, Vecchione A, Croce CM. Emerging role of miR-106b-25/miR-17-92 clusters in the control of transforming growth factor beta signaling. Cancer Res. 2008;68(20):8191–4. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poliseno L, Salmena L, Riccardi L, Fornari A, Song MS, Hobbs RM, Sportoletti P, Varmeh S, Egia A, Fedele G, Rameh L, Loda M, Pandolfi PP. Identification of the miR-106b~25 microRNA cluster as a proto-oncogenic PTEN-targeting intron that cooperates with its host gene MCM7 in transformation. Sci Signal. 2010;3(117):a29. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Qi F, Huang M, Pan Y, Liu Y, Liu J, Wen J, Xie K, Shen H, Ma H, Miao Y, Hu Z. A genetic variant in the promoter region of miR-106b-25 cluster predict clinical outcome of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e85394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Savita U, Karunagaran D. MicroRNA-106b-25 cluster targets beta-TRCP2, increases the expression of Snail and enhances cell migration and invasion in H1299 (non small cell lung cancer) cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;434(4):841–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Siegel RL, Miller KD. Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith AL, Iwanaga R, Drasin DJ, Micalizzi DS, Vartuli RL, Tan AC, Ford HL. The miR-106b-25 cluster targets Smad7, activates TGF-beta signaling, and induces EMT and tumor initiating cell characteristics downstream of Six1 in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 2012;31(50):5162–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan W, Li Y, Lim SG, Tan TM. miR-106b-25/miR-17-92 clusters: polycistrons with oncogenic roles in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(20):5962–72. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.5962.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang M, Yang YO, Jin Q, Shang L, Zhang J. Function of miR-25 in the invasion and metastasis of esophageal squamous carcinoma cells and bioinformatical analysis of the miR-106b-25 cluster. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(1):440–6. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.5358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu X, Liu Z, Wang J, Ling Q, Xie H, Guo H, Wei X, Zhou L, Zheng S. miRNA profiles in livers with different mass deficits after partial hepatectomy and miR-106b~25 cluster accelerating hepatocyte proliferation in rats. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31267. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeung ML, Yasunaga J, Bennasser Y, Dusetti N, Harris D, Ahmad N, Matsuoka M, Jeang KT. Roles for microRNAs, miR-93 and miR-130b, and tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1 tumor suppressor in cell growth dysregulation by human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1. Cancer Res. 2008;68(21):8976–85. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0769.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H, Yan X. Cantharidin modulates the E2F1/MCM7-miR-106b-93/p21-PTEN signaling axis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(5):2849–55. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3681.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang R, Guo Y, Ma Z, Ma G, Xue Q, Li F, Liu L. Long non-coding RNA PTENP1 functions as a ceRNA to modulate PTEN level by decoying miR-106b and miR-93 in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(16):26079–89. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang R, Li F, Wang W, Wang X, Li S, Liu J. The effect of antisense inhibitor of miRNA 106b approximately 25 on the proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis of gastric cancer cell. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(8):10507–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4937-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang R, Wang W, Li F, Zhang H, Liu J. MicroRNA-106b~25 expressions in tumor tissues and plasma of patients with gastric cancers. Med Oncol. 2014;31(10):243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0243-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao B, Zhang J, Zhang J, Luo R, Wang Z, Xu H, Huang B. Assessment of the 8th edition of TNM staging system for gastric cancer: the results from the SEER and a single-institution database. Future Oncol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng WS, Lai J, Yuen PC. Penalized preimage learning in kernel principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2010;21(4):551–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnn.2009.2039647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu S, Li Y, Xiao W, Yang Y. High expression of GM is associated with poor prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:4379–89. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S203345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Fangxuan Li and Jinchao Huang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China

    Fangxuan Li & Zhiyong Yuan

  2. Department of Cancer Prevention, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China

    Fangxuan Li, Jinchao Huang & Juntian Liu

  3. Department of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China

    Jinchao Huang & Wengui Xu

Authors
  1. Fangxuan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinchao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juntian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wengui Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhiyong Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FL, JH and JL analyzed and interpreted the patient data. FL and JH performed the RT-PCR of the cancer tissues, and FL was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. WX and ZY was contributed to RT-PCR and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Juntian Liu, Wengui Xu or Zhiyong Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Cancer Institute and Hospital. Written consents were obtained from each patient.

Consent for publication

Written consents were obtained from each patient to publishing their pathological images as represent Figures.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The expression of miRNA 106b~25 in TCGA database.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, F., Huang, J., Liu, J. et al. Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological and prognostic significance of miRNA 106b~25 cluster in gastric cancer. Cancer Cell Int 19, 200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0918-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0918-7

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us