Skip to main content

Establishment and characterization of HXWMF-1: the first mouse fibroblastic tumor cell line derived from leukemia-associated fibroblasts

Abstract

Background

Chemo-resistance is still a major obstacle in leukemia treatment. Accumulating evidence indicates that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), the most abundant stromal cells in tumor microenvironment (TME), play a crucial role in cancer progression and response to chemotherapy. To Figure out the role of leukemia-associated fibroblasts (LAFs) in relapsed/refractory leukemia, we constructed the first leukemia-associated fibroblastic tumor cell line, HXWMF-1.

Methods

A cell culture technique was used to establish the leukemia-associated fibroblastic tumor cell line. Molecular and cellular biological techniques including flow cytometry, MTT assay, western blotting, and short tandem repeat (STR) analysis were used to characterize the cell line. Nude mice were used for xenograft studies.

Results

We established a LAFs derived tumor cell line HXWMF-1, originated from the subcutaneous xenografts of HXEX-ALL1, a cell line originated from a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at the second relapse. The HXWMF-1 cell line was authenticated as a tumor cell line and being derived from CAFs based on morphologic, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and STR analyses and tumorigenicity test in nude mice. To clarify the reliability of the method, we got the LAFs derived tumor cells from three different tumor mass of HXEX-ALL1 xenografts.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, HXWMF-1 is the first fibroblastic tumor cell line derived from LAFs or CAFs. In addition, the cell line provided firm evidence for that leukemia cells may induce LAFs/CAFs malignant transformation, which may help to develop brand new theory and therapeutic strategies for patients with relapsed /refractory ALL.

Background

Despite great progress in curing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), survival after relapse remains poor [1,2,3]. Much of the success has been driven by refinements in risk stratification, but unfortunately, intensity of conventional chemotherapy has reach its limit of tolerance and can no longer pushed to obtain improved results [4]. Chemo-resistance remains the main challenge in successful treatment of ALL. Efforts to understand resistance to chemotherapy focused mainly on cell-intrinsic mechanism, and got few clinic benefits. To date, leukemic cells are the only drug-target in almost all the therapeutic protocols. Recently, increasing evidences indicated that cancer progression and metastasis is controlled by the tumor microenvironment (TME) and does not depend solely on cancer cell-autonomous defects, and TME should be a key target for cancer therapy [5,6,7,8]. Similarly, leukemic stem cells reside in bone marrow (BM), interact with BM microenvironment (niche) and alter the niche to facilitate their own growth and evade chemotherapy [9,10,11,12]. TME is a multicellular system with complex tumor-stromal interactions, and has been addressed five emerging concepts: its dynamic evolution, how it is educated by tumor cells, pathways of communication between stromal and tumor cells, immunomodulatory roles of the lymphatic system, and contribution of the intestinal microbiota [13]. Now, to explore the therapeutic target in TME has become the key point in cancer treatment.

A dominant component of the tumor stroma is fibroblasts, which has been extensively concerned owing to their role in cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis [14, 15]. Fibroblasts associated with cancer have been termed cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAFs), activated fibroblasts or activated myofibroblasts. CAFs are the most abundant stromal cells within TME [14, 15]. Although CAFs have been explored in depth in many solid tumors, only a few studies have directly addressed the role of the CAFs in leukemia. For that, BM biopsies are not routinely performed in patients with leukemia [16]. Recently, papers reported that CAFs are widespread in the BM and play a pivotal role in cancer progress and chemoresistance in hematological malignances, multiple myeloma, chronic lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML), and ALL [16,17,18,19,20,21]. In addition, excessive reticular fibers in the BM led to a poor prognosis in ALL and AML patients [22, 23], making it important to investigate the functional roles of the fibroblasts.

Activated fibroblasts isolated from various human tumors exhibit many distinct properties when compared with fibroblasts cultured from normal organs [14, 15, 24]. Cell lines established from tumors are the most commonly used models in cancer research, which have promoted a better understanding of the biology of cancer and helped to develop effective treatment strategies [25]. To explore the interaction of CAFs and chemo-resistant leukemic cells, we tried to establish leukemia-associated fibroblasts (LAFs) cell lines from xenografts of HXEX-ALL1, a B-ALL cell line, for that the cell line was established from a 6-years-patient of B-ALL relapsed two times after contemporary risk-directed chemotherapy [26]. Unexpected and surprised, we got a fibroblastic tumor cell line from the xenografts, which might help to understand the crosstalk between TME and cancer cells, especially in patients with refractory or relapsed cancer.

Methods

Cell line establishment and culture

HXEX-ALL1, a pediatric B-ALL cell line established in our laboratory [26], was cultured as reported [26]. Cultured 5 × 106 HXEX-ALL1 cells were subcutaneously injected into the right flanks of 6-week-old female BALB/c (nu/nu) nude mice. After 28 days, tumor mass was dissected and minced with scissors. Cells, isolated from the resected tumor mass, were cultured in vitro in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After 3 days, a little part of cells was attached with spindle or long-spindle shape. Then, the medium was changed to remove floating cells. Passage was performed until 80% confluence of cells. After 24 days, cells with long-spindle shape disappeared, and the attached cells became spindle or polygon in shape. After 40 days of lag phase, the cell number dramatically increased, and the cell density was adjusted to 1.5–2 × 105/55 cm2. Cells at 80% confluency were split in the ratio of 1:5 or 1:6 every 2–3 days. The cells were examined daily under an inverted microscope, and the cell number was determined every 2 days with a standard hematocytometer using trypan blue dye exclusion. The obtained cells were designated HXWMF-1.

Cell morphologic assay

Morphological characteristics of live cultured cells were observed under an inverted microscope (Olympus, MA, USA). HXWMF-1 cells of climbing flake were stained with Wright-Giemsa and observed under an optical microscope (Olympus). Cell ultrastructure was observed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI Company, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Cell growth assay

Cells were cultured in a 6-well plastic culture plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) at 2 × 103/9.6cm2 in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS and grown for eight days. Viable cells were counted using trypan blue (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, UAS) staining every day. Td (doubling time) was calculated for cells in exponential growth with the following equation: Td (h) = t × lg2/lg(Nt/N0), where t is the time of continuous culture, Nt is the final number of cells, and N0 is the initial number of cells. Cell viability was evaluated by the 3-(4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.

Cell cycle analysis

For each analysis, 106 cells were harvested and fixed overnight in 70% ethanol at 4 °C. The cells were then washed and stained with 5 μg/ml PI in the presence of DNAse-free RNAse (Sigma). After 30 min at room temperature, the cells were analyzed via flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL, USA) with the acquisition of 30,000 events.

Cell colony formation assay

Logarithmically growing cells were harvested and seeded in 6-well sterile plastic culture plates at a density of 2 × 102 cells /9.6 cm2 in methylcellulose RPMI-1640 medium containing 0.9% methylcellulose (MethoCult GFH4434; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 10% FBS at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and 21% O2. When the visible colonies appeared in the dish, the culture was terminated. The clones were fixed with 5 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, and then stained with crystal violet for 10–30 min. Imaging and cell counting were performed under an inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The clone formation rate (%) = number of clones formed/number of cells inoculated × 100%. Random aspiration of individual colonies growing in methylcellulose was undertaken on day 7 of the culture. Next, each clone was cultured in RPMI-1640 complete medium.

Short tandem repeat analysis

The identity of the HXWMF-1 cell line was checked using short tandem repeat (STR) analysis. DNA was prepared from whole HXWMF-1 cells using a genomic DNA kit (Microread Genetics, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following 12 highly polymorphic STR loci were tested by multiplex PCR: 18–3, 9–2, 6–7, 5–5, X-1, 15–3, 12–1, 6–4, csf1po, VWA, 4–2 and jarid1.

Chromosome analysis

In brief, cells were incubated with standard medium containing 100 ng/ml colcemid for 2 h. Chromosomes were prepared by a standard method and analyzed by the G-banding technique.

Immunophenotypic analysis

For the detection of the immunophenotype of the HXWMF-1 cells, we used antibodies against the following targets: fibroblast specific protein 1 (FSP1, also named as S100A4), CD34, LY-6A/E (Sca-1) and CD166 (Becton Dickinson Inc., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Expression of the markers was determined using a flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Inc.).

Western blotting analysis

Western blotting analysis was performed on lysates obtained from HXWMF-1, HXEX-ALL1, and BaF3 (a mouse pro-B cell line) cells. Proteins were separated by 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (0.45 or 0.22 μm, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Proteins were visualized by incubation with ECL plus reagent (Millipore). All experiments were independently carried out at least 3 times. The level of β-actin protein was used as a control for the amount of protein loaded onto each lane.

In vivo experiments

Cultured 3 × 106 HXWMF-1 cells were subcutaneously injected into the right flanks of 5-week-old female BALB/c (nu/nu) nude mice, with 0.2 ml of PBS injected into the left flanks as the control (n = 6). Tumor size was measured by calipers every 2 days. The approximate tumor volume was calculated using the equation V = (length × width × width)/2. All animal care was in compliance with the guidelines established by the internal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Ethics Committee of Sichuan University. After the mice were euthanized, the tumor mass was excised, fixed in 10% formalin, and routinely processed for paraffin embedding. Five-millimeter-thick sections were obtained and prepared for standard histopathological examination.

Migration assay

A wound healing assay was done to measure the closure of a scratch and the migration rate of the cells. Cells were incubated for 3 days and images were taken on each day under inverted microscopy.

Statistical analysis

All assays were performed in triplicate, and the data were expressed as the mean value ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to compare two groups. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Establishment of the HXWMF-1 cell line

A stable cell population was constructed following 40 days of culture of primary dissected tumor mass. Initially, contamination of long spindle-shaped cells and adipose cells were observed, but they disappeared from the cultures upon passaging the cells. The cells were maintained in fresh medium (RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS) passaged at 2- to 3-days intervals. The obtained cells were designated HXWMF-1 and made available. The HXWMF-1 cells had been in culture continuously for more than 18 months, and passaged more than 180 times, and more than 800 population doubling levels (PDLs) were successively carried out. The cells proliferated consistently and were negative for mycoplasma infection based on PCR. The cells could be frozen under standard conditions using 60% RPMI-1640 medium, 30% FBS and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and successfully revived after storage in liquid nitrogen, with more than 80% viability. The cells maintained the same properties after freezing and thawing.

Morphological characteristics of HXWMF-1 cells

After plating, spindle-shaped HXWMF-1 cells adhered to wall when it was maintained under monolayer. Before reaching confluence, the cells lost their ability of postconfluence contact inhibition of division, and grew in overlap of spindle or polygonal shape (Fig. 1a). Wright-Giemsa stain showed that the cells contained a single nucleus that was commonly ovoid or round, with big nucleoplasm ratio and several prominent nucleoli (Fig. 1b, c). Moreover, spindle or polygonal shaped cells with densely filamentous microvilli and lamellar prominences on the surface, lots of microvilli outside the network and cell connection, and large nucleus with clear cellular organelle structures such as ribosome, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, lysosome, glycogen and secretory granules in cytoplasm, were clearly visualized under a TEM and SEM (Fig. 1d–i).

Fig. 1
figure1

Morphological characteristics of HXWMF-1 cell line. a Morphology of HXWMF-1 cells under a light microscopy (×400 magnification). Cells grew mainly in clusters of spindle or polygonal shape. b, c Wright-Giemsa staining of HXWMF-1 cells (b ×200 magnification; c ×400 magnification) showed the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio of these cells was high. df Ultrastructural appearance under a SEM (×5000 magnification) showed spindle or polygonal shaped cells with densely filamentous microvilli and lamellar prominences on the surface. gi Ultrastructural appearance under a TEM (g ×10,000 magnification, h ×12,000 magnification, i ×25,000 magnification) showed lots of microvilli outside the network and cell connection and clear cellular organelle

Proliferation of HXWMF-1 cells

We determined the proliferation for 8 days at different cell PDLs of HXWMF-1 cells (Fig. 2a–c). The results revealed that HXWMF-1 cells stably proliferated in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS with a population Td of 12 to 17 h without significant differences (P > 0.05) at different PDLs. Flow cytometry revealed that the DNA index was 1.63 ± 0.05 with an aneuploidy cycle (Fig. 2d). Our results suggesting that the HXWMF-1 cells could stably proliferation during continuous culture in vitro.

Fig. 2
figure2

Growth curve of HXWMF-1 cells at different PDLs. Cells were cultured in a 6-well culture plate at 2 × 103/9.6 cm2 in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS and grown for 8 days. Viable cells were counted using trypan blue staining every day. Experiments were performed in triplicate. a 100 PDLs. b 300 PDLs. c 500 PDLs. d DNA index showed DNA aneuploid of HXWMF-1. Cell cycle was analyzed by PI staining. DNA index was calculated as the ratio of aneuploid to diploid G0/G1 peak channel

Authorization of HXWMF-1 cells

Using a multiplex STR system, we verified that the HXWMF-1 cells were originated from mouse (Fig. 3a, Table 1). G-banding analysis showed that HXWMF-1 cells have 60–70 chromosomes with complex structural chromosomal abnormalities (Fig. 3b). To confirm the expression of fibroblastic cell markers in HXWMF-1 cells, FSP1, CD34, LY-6A/E and CD166 were measured positive by flow cytometry. Western blotting confirmed that α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), FSP1, Vimentin, heat shock protein 47 (HSP47), fibroblast activation protein (FAP), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) were highly expressed in HXWMF-1 cells (Fig. 3c). The migratory ability of HXWMF-1 cells was analyzed with the wound healing assay, and the results showed that HXWMF-1 cells closed the scratched area in 72 h (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3
figure3

Authorization of HXWMF-1 cells. a STR of HXWMF-1 cells showed that HXWMF-1 cells were originated from mouse. b G-banding karyotype showed a complex chromosome aberration with total 60–70 chromosomes in HXWMF-1 cells. c Fibroblastic cell markers of HXWMF-1 cells. Cells were lysed, and extracts were analyzed by western blotting for α-SMA, FSP1, Vimentin, HSP47, FAP, PDGFRα and PDGFRβ. β-Actin was used as an internal control. Experiments were performed in triplicate. d Wound healing assay showed that HXWMF-1 cells closed the scratched area in 72 h

Table 1 STR analysis of HXWMF-1 cells

The tumorigenicity of HXWMF-1 cells

To determine the tumorigenicity of HXWMF-1 cells, we did the colony formation test in vitro, and found that visible colonies appeared on the methylcellulose plate after 6 days, and the clone formation rate was 12.0 ± 4.5%. Then, an in vivo test was conformed; 3 × 106 cells were injected into female BALB/c (nu/nu) nude mice (n = 6) subcutaneously. After 15 days, subcutaneous tumors were observed in 6 mice, with a mean volume of 2835.01 ± 707.98 mm3 (n = 3) (Fig. 4a, b). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining indicated that the tumor masses were composed of tumor cells with abundant angiogenesis (Fig. 4c). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining showed that α-SMA, FSP1, Vimentin and HSP47 were highly expressed in the xenografts (Fig. 4d–f).

Fig. 4
figure4

Tumorigenicity of HXWMF-1 cells. a Subcutaneous tumor mass in nude mice (arrow indicated). b The growth curve of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice (n = 6, age 5–6 weeks). All animal procedures were carried out in accordance with the guidelines established by the internal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Ethics Committee guidelines of Sichuan University. c HE staining of the tumor showed that the tumor mass was composed of leukemia cells and blood vessels (×200 magnification). df, h On IHC staining, tumors derived from HXWMF-1 expressed α-SMA (d), FSP1 (e), Vimentin (f), and HSP47 (h). Original magnification: ×1000

To verify that HXEX-ALL1 can induce the stromal cells malignant transformed, we repeated the above experiments, and obtained another two malignant CAFs cell lines, named HXWMF-2 and HXWMF-3, derived from another two xenografts tumor masses of HXEX-ALL1. The two novel CAFs tumor cells repeated the characteristics of HXWMF-1.

Discussion

HXWMF-1 is the firstly constructed leukemia associated fibroblastic tumor cell line. To our knowledge, the research first reports that cancer cells can induce the stomal cells to be malignant transfomed, and the HXWMF-1 is the first LAFs/CAFs tumor cell line cultured in vitro.

Among all cells, fibroblasts could be considered the cockroaches of the human body, and survive severe stress that is usually lethal to all other cells, and they are the only normal cell type that can be live-cultured from post-mortem and decaying tissue [14]. They synthesize the extracellular matrix and play a crucial role in maintaining the structural integrity of most tissues. The accurate definition of fibroblasts remains an issue of debate, although they were first defined approximately a century and a half ago as spindle-shaped cells capable of collagen synthesis in connective tissue [15, 24, 27, 28]. For that, fibroblasts are highly heterogeneous in their origins, molecular markers and functions, and they exhibit distinct cellular phenotypes with inherent plasticity and resiliency according to the surrounding microenvironment [14, 24, 28, 29]. Activated fibroblasts were firstly found in wounded healing in 1971[30], and then, in 1979, activated fibroblasts found in TME are termed CAFs [31].

In recent years, extensive research demonstrated that CAFs are the main cellular constituents of the TME in both primary and metastatic cancer [29]. Consistent with fibroblasts, CAFs are highly heterogeneous in their origins, molecular markers and functions also [14, 15, 21, 24, 28, 32]. CAFs may originate from the local microenvironment, or can be recruited to the tumor from a distant source, such as BM [14, 29]. Although the precise origins of CAFs are not fully elucidated, in general, CAFs can be derived from normal resident tissue fibroblasts, fibrocyte and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); MSCs and fibrocyte recruited from BM; epithelial or endothelial cells that are adjacent to cancer cells and undergo epithelial- to- mesenchymal transition or endothelial- to- mesenchymal transition; and other cells undergo trans-differentiation, such as adipocyte, pericyte and smooth muscle cells [15]. That is to say, CAFs are not a homogenous cell population, and these cells have diverse functions, implying that tumor-promoting CAF and tumor-suppressing CAFs coexist in the tumor stroma [15, 28, 29, 33].

Targeting CAFs, by altering their numbers, subtype or functionality is being explored as an avenue to improve cancer therapies [28]. However, research in this area faces numerous challenges, not least because CAFs can have both protumorigenic and antitumorigenic effects. The lack of CAFs-specific markers poses a challenge in considering CAFs-target therapy. Therefore, identifying markers of CAFs has become an increasingly fruitful undertaking [14, 24, 27, 28, 32, 34,35,36]. Owing to their preponderance and inherent plasticity, CAFs are relatively easy to isolate and culture and thus have been extensively studied in vitro.

Recently, we constructed a cell line, HXEX-ALL1, which was originated from a pediatric patient with relapsed B-ALL after contemporary chemotherapy [26]. To explore the microenvironment of relapsed ALL, we tried to construct CAFs cell line from the HXEX-ALL1 xenografts in nude mice. We cannot believe that a LAFs/CAFs tumor cell line was constructed until the cell line was passaged for 50 times and proliferated quickly and stably. Different to HXEX-ALL1, the HXWMF-1 cells grow adhering to the wall with spindle- or polygonal-shape. STR results showed that the cells are originated from mouse. HXWMF-1 cells exhibit all the characteristics of cancer cells [37]: limitless replicative potential with a loss of postconfluence contact inhibition; resisting cell death; self-sufficiency in growth signaling with a colony formation ability in methylcellulose; invasion and metastasis with a rapidly wound healing ability in vitro and a high capacity of tumorigenicity in vivo; genome instability and mutation with a complex karyotype; inducing angiogenesis with an abundant neovasculature in HXWMF-1 xenografts. Interestingly, we got two more fibroblastic tumor cell lines from another two HXEX-ALL1 xenografts with similar characteristics. Using the same method, we did not obtain CAFs tumor cells from xenografts of ALL cell lines, Nalm-6 and CEM-C1-15. That is to say, the phenotype of ALL cells may determinate the phenotype of CAFs. Fortunately, a recent research base on single-cell multiomics sequencing reported that somatic copy number alterations are prevalent in fibroblasts, especially in CAFs, and five genes (BGN, RCN3, TAGLN, MYL9, and TPM2) are identified as fibroblast-specific biomarkers of poorer prognosis of colorectal cancer [38]. We suppose, under proper microenvironment, the fibroblasts with genetic alteration might be malignant transformed, just as the HXWMF-1 cells; and the TME with malignant TME may bring about the cancer progression and poor prognosis.

CAFs are distinguished from their normal counterparts by the differential expression of markers such as α-SMA, FAP, FSP1, and PDGFR, although none of which was CAFs-specific marker [14, 15, 28, 29]. Recently, increasing evidences showed that CAFs can be classified into myofibroblast phenotype with a high α-SMA expression, and inflammatory phenotype with a low or negative α-SMA expression and secretion of chemokine [28, 35]. In-depth researches showed that CD10+GPR77+ CAFs may correlate with chemoresistance in breast cancer and lung cancer [34]; PDGFRα negative CAFs may correlate with poor prognosis in breast cancer [36]. Our research showed that α-SMA, FSP1, Vimentin, HSP47, FAP, PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, CD34, LY-6A/E (Sca-1) and CD166 were all positive expressed in HXWMF-1 cells. The exact roles of those markers need to be explored in depth.

For a long time, we found that some patients got a donor cell leukemia (DCL) after bone marrow transplantation [39,40,41,42,43,44]. DCL was first described in 1971, and for years the incidence of DCL was increasing [39]. The molecular mechanisms for DCL remain unclear. A ‘‘multiple hit’’ hypothesis has been proposed; genetic factors might prime stem cells with a pre-leukemic phenotype within the donor, with a range of recipient- and therapy-specific factors probably interacting to contribute toward realization of malignant potential following engraftment into the more conducive bone marrow environment of the recipient [39,40,41,42,43,44]. Here, we suppose that the microenvironment with malignant stromal cells may interact with the donor cells and induce the neoplastic transformation. A paper of newly published speculated that certain mutations in the donor cells might have a selective advantage in specific conditions of the BM microenvironment [41]. However, to date there is no firm evidence to support this theory. Fortunately, the novel LAFs/CAFs tumor cell line can help to investigate the mechanisms.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, HXWMF-1 is the first fibroblastic tumor cell line derived from LAFs or CAFs. In addition, the cell line is the first evidence for that leukemia cells may induce LAFs/CAFs malignant transformation. HXWMF-1 may help to explore in-depth the mechanisms of DCL and BM fibrosis. More important, with this novel cell line, scientists can investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying interaction of TME and ALL cells, and develop brand new theory and therapeutic strategies for patients with ALL, especially for patients with relapsed/refractory ALL.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALL:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

BM:

Bone marrow

CAFs:

Cancer-associated fibroblasts

DCL:

Donor cell leukemia

LAFs:

Leukemia-associated fibroblasts

PDL:

Population doubling level

STR:

Short tandem repeat

Td:

Doubling time

TME:

Tumor microenvironment

References

  1. 1.

    Teachey DT, Pui CH. Comparative features and outcomes between paediatric T-cell and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(3):e142-142e154.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bhojwani D, Pui CH. Relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(6):e205–17.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hunger SP, Raetz EA. How I treat relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the pediatric population. Blood. 2020;136(16):1803–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pui CH. Precision medicine in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Front Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0759-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1423–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon DF, Merad M, et al. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med. 2018;24(5):541–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pine AR, Cirigliano SM, Nicholson JG, Hu Y, Linkous A, Miyaguchi K, et al. Tumor microenvironment is critical for the maintenance of cellular states found in primary glioblastomas. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(7):964–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Taniguchi S, Elhance A, Van Duzer A, Kumar S, Leitenberger JJ, Oshimori N. Tumor-initiating cells establish an IL-33-TGF-β niche signaling loop to promote cancer progression. Science. 2020;369(6501):eaay1813.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pinho S, Frenette PS. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(5):303–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ghobrial IM, Detappe A, Anderson KC, Steensma DP. The bone-marrow niche in MDS and MGUS: implications for AML and MM. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(4):219–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Batsivari A, Haltalli M, Passaro D, Pospori C, Lo Celso C, Bonnet D. Dynamic responses of the haematopoietic stem cell niche to diverse stresses. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22(1):7–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Duarte D, Hawkins ED, Lo CC. The interplay of leukemia cells and the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood. 2018;131(14):1507–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Swartz MA, Iida N, Roberts EW, Sangaletti S, Wong MH, Yull FE, et al. Tumor microenvironment complexity: emerging roles in cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2012;72(10):2473–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(9):582–98.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen X, Song E. Turning foes to friends: targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(2):99–115.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhai Y, Zhang J, Wang H, Lu W, Liu S, Yu Y, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15 contributes to cancer-associated fibroblasts-mediated chemo-protection of AML cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35(1):147.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Frassanito MA, Rao L, Moschetta M, Ria R, Di Marzo L, De Luisi A, et al. Bone marrow fibroblasts parallel multiple myeloma progression in patients and mice: in vitro and in vivo studies. Leukemia. 2014;28(4):904–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Paggetti J, Haderk F, Seiffert M, Janji B, Distler U, Ammerlaan W, et al. Exosomes released by chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells induce the transition of stromal cells into cancer-associated fibroblasts. Blood. 2015;126(9):1106–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Duan CW, Shi J, Chen J, Wang B, Yu YH, Qin X, et al. Leukemia propagating cells rebuild an evolving niche in response to therapy. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(6):778–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Burt R, Dey A, Aref S, Aguiar M, Akarca A, Bailey K, et al. Activated stromal cells transfer mitochondria to rescue acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells from oxidative stress. Blood. 2019;134(17):1415–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Raffaghello L, Vacca A, Pistoia V, Ribatti D. Cancer associated fibroblasts in hematological malignancies. Oncotarget. 2015;6(5):2589–603.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Reda G, Riva M, Fattizzo B, Cassin R, Giannarelli D, Pennisi M, et al. Bone marrow fibrosis and early hematological response as predictors of poor outcome in azacitidine treated high risk-patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2018;55(4):202–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Norén-Nyström U, Roos G, Bergh A, Botling J, Lönnerholm G, Porwit A, et al. Bone marrow fibrosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia correlates to biological factors, treatment response and outcome. Leukemia. 2008;22(3):504–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    LeBleu VS, Neilson EG. Origin and functional heterogeneity of fibroblasts. FASEB J. 2020;34(3):3519–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    MacLeod RA, Nagel S, Scherr M, Schneider B, Dirks WG, Uphoff CC, et al. Human leukemia and lymphoma cell lines as models and resources. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(4):339–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhu Y, Yang R, Gao J, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Gu L. Establishment and characterization of a novel childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, HXEX-ALL1, with chromosome 9p and 17p deletions. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:113.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ganguly D, Chandra R, Karalis J, Teke M, Aguilera T, Maddipati R, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: versatile players in the tumor microenvironment. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2652.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sahai E, Astsaturov I, Cukierman E, DeNardo DG, Egeblad M, Evans RM, et al. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(3):174–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yoshida GJ. Regulation of heterogeneous cancer-associated fibroblasts: the molecular pathology of activated signaling pathways. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):112.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majne G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia. 1971;27(5):549–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Seemayer TA, Lagacé R, Schürch W, Tremblay G. Myofibroblasts in the stroma of invasive and metastatic carcinoma: a possible host response to neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 1979;3(6):525–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nurmik M, Ullmann P, Rodriguez F, Haan S, Letellier E. In search of definitions: cancer-associated fibroblasts and their markers. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(4):895–905.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Louault K, Li RR, DeClerck YA. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: understanding their heterogeneity. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(11):3108.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Su S, Chen J, Yao H, Liu J, Yu S, Lao L, et al. CD10+GPR77+ Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote cancer formation and chemoresistance by sustaining cancer stemness. Cell. 2018;172(4):841-56.e16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Öhlund D, Handly-Santana A, Biffi G, Elyada E, Almeida AS, Ponz-Sarvise M, et al. Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J Exp Med. 2017;214(3):579–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Raz Y, Cohen N, Shani O, Bell RE, Novitskiy SV, Abramovitz L, et al. Bone marrow-derived fibroblasts are a functionally distinct stromal cell population in breast cancer. J Exp Med. 2018;215(12):3075–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhou Y, Bian S, Zhou X, Cui Y, Wang W, Wen L, et al. Single-cell multiomics sequencing reveals prevalent genomic alterations in tumor stromal cells of human colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:1–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wiseman DH. Donor cell leukemia: a review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17(6):771–89.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ketterl TG, Wu D, Fromm JR, Soma L, Dahlberg AE, Wood BL, et al. Donor derived T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia after cord blood transplant for pediatric T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53(3):352–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shahar Gabay T, Chapal-Ilani N, Moskovitz Y, Biezuner T, Oron B, Brilon Y, et al. Donor cell leukemia: reappearance of gene mutations in donor cells - more than an incidental phenomenon. Haematologica. 2020;105(12):2861–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bouvier A, Ribourtout B, François S, Orvain C, Paz DL, Beucher A, et al. Donor cell-derived acute promyelocytic leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eur J Haematol. 2018;101(4):570–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Suárez-González J, Martínez-Laperche C, Martínez N, Rodríguez-Macías G, Kwon M, Balsalobre P, et al. Whole-exome sequencing reveals acquisition of mutations leading to the onset of donor cell leukemia after hematopoietic transplantation: a model of leukemogenesis. Leukemia. 2018;32(8):1822–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gondek LP, Zheng G, Ghiaur G, DeZern AE, Matsui W, Yegnasubramanian S, et al. Donor cell leukemia arising from clonal hematopoiesis after bone marrow transplantation. Leukemia. 2016;30(9):1916–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Ji Zhang and Dr. Yufang Wang for helping us complete the experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFH0062), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. SCU2019C4005).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YL performed a part of the research. LG designed the research, performed a part of the research, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Gu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal care was in compliance with the guidelines established by the internal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Ethics Committee guidelines of Sichuan University.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Gu, L. Establishment and characterization of HXWMF-1: the first mouse fibroblastic tumor cell line derived from leukemia-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Cell Int 21, 177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01870-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts
  • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • Leukemic environment
  • Cell line