Skip to main content
Download PDF

Contribution of nuclear BCL10 expression to tumor progression and poor prognosis of advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by activating NF-κB-related signaling

Cancer Cell International volume 21, Article number: 436 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We previously demonstrated that nuclear BCL10 translocation participates in the instigation of NF-κB in breast cancer and lymphoma cell lines. In this study, we assessed whether nuclear BCL10 translocation is clinically significant in advanced and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Method and materials

We analyzed the expression of BCL10-, cell cycle-, and NF-κB- related signaling molecules, and the DNA-binding activity of NF-κB in three PDAC cell lines (mutant KRAS lines: PANC-1 and AsPC-1; wild-type KRAS line: BxPC-3) using BCL10 short hairpin RNA (shBCL10). To assess the anti-tumor effect of BCL10 knockdown in PDAC xenograft model, PANC-1 cells treated with or without shBCL10 transfection were inoculated into the flanks of mice. We assessed the expression patterns of BCL10 and NF-κB in tumor cells in 136 patients with recurrent, advanced, and metastatic PDAC using immunohistochemical staining.

Results

We revealed that shBCL10 transfection caused cytoplasmic translocation of BCL10 from the nuclei, inhibited cell viability, and enhanced the cytotoxicities of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in three PDAC cell lines. Inhibition of BCL10 differentially blocked cell cycle progression in PDAC cell lines. Arrest at G1 phase was noted in wild-type KRAS cell lines; and arrest at G2/M phase was noted in mutant KRAS cell lines. Furthermore, shBCL10 transfection downregulated the expression of phospho-CDC2, phospho-CDC25C, Cyclin B1 (PANC-1), Cyclins A, D1, and E, CDK2, and CDK4 (BxPC-3), p-IκBα, nuclear expression of BCL10, BCL3, and NF-κB (p65), and attenuated the NF-κB pathway activation and its downstream molecule, c-Myc, while inhibition of BCL10 upregulated expression of p21, and p27 in both PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells. In a PANC-1-xenograft mouse model, inhibition of BCL10 expression also attenuated the tumor growth of PDAC. In clinical samples, nuclear BCL10 expression was closely associated with nuclear NF-κB expression (p < 0.001), and patients with nuclear BCL10 expression had the worse median overall survival than those without nuclear BCL10 expression (6.90 months versus 9.53 months, p = 0.019).

Conclusion

Nuclear BCL10 translocation activates NF-κB signaling and contributes to tumor progression and poor prognosis of advanced/metastatic PDAC.

Introduction

The majority of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are diagnosed when the cancer becomes un-resectable and metastatic [1, 2]. The median survival for patients with locally advanced PDAC, who received combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, varies from 7 to 21 months [3, 4]. However, the median survival for patients with metastatic PDAC is approximately 3–6 months after treatment with single-agent or combinational chemotherapy, or with targeted therapy [4, 5]. In contrast to the efficacies of epidermal growth factor receptor- or vascular endothelial growth factor-targeting agents in many solid tumors, aforementioned molecular targeted agents exhibit limited therapeutic efficacies in patients with PDAC [6,7,8].

Tumor microenvironments, for example, pancreatic stellate cells (main components of the stroma) can promote the proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance of pancreatic cancer cells [9, 10]. Previous studies have demonstrated that sonic hedgehog (Shh) ligands facilitate cell proliferation of PDAC through triggering nuclear factor (NF)-κB [11, 12]. Our previous work showed that nuclear expression of NF-κB or Gli1 (a determinant of Shh signaling) was associated with poor overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced and metastatic PDAC after commencing chemotherapy [13]. These findings suggested that proinflammatory cytokines or growth factors can activate NF-κB signaling in stromal or cancer cells of PDAC though autocrine or paracrine loop.

BCL10 (B-cell CLL/lymphoma 10), cloned from the t(1;14)(p22;q32), is involved in the pathogenesis of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [14, 15]. When BCL10 is expressed in the cytoplasm of normal T and B cells, it communicates antigen receptor mediated signals and further activates NF-κB signaling [16, 17]. We have previously reported that nuclear translocation and co-localization of BCL10 and NF-κB are closely associated with antibiotic-unresponsiveness of gastric MALT lymphoma [18, 19]. In human breast cancer cells (MCF7 cell lines), we revealed that AKT, activated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), phosphorylates BCL10 at Ser218 and Ser231, which subsequently forms a complex with BCL3 (containing a nuclear localization signal) to enter the nucleus and further activate NF-κB signaling [20]. Furthermore, we reported that BCL10 regulates tumor cell growth of cervical cancer cells by regulating the activation of NF-κB-dependent Cyclin D1 signaling [21]. These results revealed an association between nuclear BCL10 translocation and the activation of NF-κB in certain subtypes of solid cancers. However, little is known about the biological characteristics of BCL10 in PDAC, although the expression of BCL10 has previously been reported in pancreatic acinar cell cancer [22].

Considering that NF-κB activation has been shown to be associated with the pathogenesis and prognosis of PDAC [13, 23, 24], we sought to investigate whether BCL10 signaling and its association with NF-κB activation possesses any clinical significance with respect to PDAC. We first assessed the BCL10-mediated regulation of cell proliferation and activation of NF-κB in PDAC through both in vitro and in vivo models. Subsequently, we examined the association between nuclear BCL10 expression patterns in tumor cells and the clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent, advanced, and metastatic PDAC who received systemic chemotherapy.

Methods and materials

Pancreatic cancer cell lines

Although the point mutations of KRAS on codon 12 (exon 2) consist of major initiating oncogenic events and progression processes in approximately 80% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [25, 26], KRAS mutations were not detected in some patients with PDAC. In East Asian patients with PDAC, including Taiwanese patients, the frequencies of KRAS mutations in codon 12 (exon 2) have been reported to range from 72 to 90% [27,28,29]. In other words, approximately 15–20% of patients harbored wild-type KRAS PDAC. Previous evidence has demonstrated that KRAS mutation can activate the KRAS protein, which further triggers a cascade of survival signaling, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), extracellular signal- regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and NF-κB, and thus promotes proliferation, migration, invasiveness, and causes further progression and poor prognosis of PDAC [30, 31]. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms contributing to tumor proliferation, migration, invasiveness, and progression in patients with wild-type KRAS PDAC remain unclear. To investigate whether BCL10 is involved in the molecular pathogenesis, treatment efficacy, and prognosis of patients with advanced and metastatic PDAC irrespective of KRAS mutation status, we selected three PDAC cell lines, including mutant KRAS cell lines (PANC-1 and AsPC-1) and wild-type cell line (BxPC-3) in this study, to mimic the in vitro biology of PDAC and further explore the underlying molecular mechanisms regulated by nuclear BCL10.

The human PDAC cell lines, PANC-1 (mutant KRAS), AsPC-1 (mutant KRAS), and BxPC-3 (wild type KRAS), were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The PANC-1 cell line was maintained in complete Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), whereas AsPC-1 and BxPC-3 were maintained in complete Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640. Furthermore, all cell lines were cultured in an incubator containing a humidified atmosphere and 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

The shRNA-mediated BCL10 silencing in PDAC cell lines

Previously, we demonstrated that TNF-α expression resulted in the BCL10 nuclear translocation due to phosphorylation of BCL10 Ser218 or Ser231 in MCF7 cells [20]. The short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-expression lentiviral vector of BCL10 (TRCN0000359256) was obtained from the National RNAi Core Facility (Taipei, Taiwan), and the silenced site was located in the Ser231 of BCL10 (Additional file 1: Figure S1). For construction of the lentiviruses, BCL10 shRNA transfected (shBCL10) vectors, psPAX2 (Addgene), and pMD2.G (Addgene), were cotransfected into 293 T cells. At 48 h after transfection, the supernatant was collected and used to infect the three PDAC cell lines. The pGIPZ lentiviral vector (Fisher Scientific) was used as a scrambled control.

Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assay

The PDAC cells with or without transfection of shBCL10 lentivirus were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 1000 cells/well. Every 2 days, the levels of cell proliferation were assessed using a Premixed WST-1 Cell Proliferation Reagent (Clontech). The absorbance was detected at 450 nm against the background control using a multi-well plate reader. The cell proliferation rate was calculated as follows: Proliferation rate = (absorbance/absorbance of Day 1) × 100%. The results are revealed as the mean ± standard error (SE) of three different experiments.

For cytotoxicity assay, cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 3000 cells/well, and then, treated with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin at various doses. After incubation at 37 °C for 72 h, cell viability was also measured using Premixed WST-1 Cell Proliferation Reagent. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE of three different experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Flow cytometric analysis

The untransfected, scramble shRNA (Scr) transfected, and shBCL10 transfected PDAC cells seeded into 6-cm dishes were detached using 0.05% trypsin–EDTA (Gibco). The harvested cells were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and then, fixed in 70% cold ethanol at 4 °C overnight. Fixed cells were washed twice with PBS, incubated with 50 µg/ml RNase at 37 °C for 30 min, and stained with propidium iodide (PI) (50 µg/mL) on ice for 30 min. The cell cycle phases of stained cells were analyzed in the FL-2 channel using a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, BD FACSCalibur™ system).

Confocal immunofluorescence

The shBCL10 untreated and treated PDAC cells were plated on cell culture slide (SPL Life Sciences) overnight. After washing twice with PBS, the cells fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 8 min, permeabilized with 0.1% TritonX-100 in PBS for 10 min, and blocked with 3% BSA at room temperature for 1 h. Then, cells were incubated with the anti-BCL10 primary antibody (1:200) (sc-9560; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) overnight. Subsequently, the cells were washed with PBS and incubated with DyLight 488 conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (dilution 1:1000 in PBS) (Biotium, 40043) for 5 min. The stained cells were examined using a confocal laser scanning microscope (TCS SP5, Leica Microsystems) and a Leica Application Suite 2.02.

Immunoblotting analysis

Whole cell lysates and nuclear lysates of PADC cells were harvested from each cell subclones. Equal amounts of protein extracts were fractionated on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-Tris glycine polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gel and then electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore). Primary antibodies against the following molecules were used for the analysis: BCL10 (sc-9560; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), BCL3 (sc-185; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), phospho (p)-IκBα (Thr389; #2905; Cell Signaling Technology), NF-κB (p65; #9451; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p-p65 (Ser536, 93H1; Cell Signaling Technology), c-Myc (sc-40; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK)2 (#18048; Cell Signaling Technology), CDK4 (#12790; Cell Signaling Technology), cell division cycle (CDC)2 (#28439; Cell Signaling Technology), p-CDC2 (#4539; Cell Signaling Technology), CDC25C (#4688; Cell Signaling Technology), p-CDC25C (#4901; Cell Signaling Technology), Cyclin A (#53230; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Cyclin B1 (sc-752; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Cyclin D1 (#2972; Cell Signaling Technology), Cyclin E (sc-9566; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p21: (#2947; Cell Signaling Technology), p27 (#SC-528; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), β-actin (A5316, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), α-tubulin (CP06, Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA), and GAPDH (#5174; Cell Signaling Technology) [19, 21, 32,33,34]. The specific reactive bands on membranes were probed using appropriate secondary IgG antibodies conjugated to horse radish peroxidase. The immune complexes were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (ECL, Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim) and quantification was performed using the Image Quant software (GE Healthcare). All experiments were repeated at least three times.

Luciferase assays

For the NF-κB promoter analysis, PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells were transfected with 5 µg of NF-κB-Luc reporter plasmid DNA (BD Bioscience, Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) for 6 h by using Transfast Transfection Reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The luciferase activity of the cell lysates was measured according to the luciferase assay kit manual (Promega) and normalized for the amount of protein in each cell lysate [19, 21].

In vivo animal experiments

Male NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid mice were purchased from the National Laboratory Animal Center, Taiwan. Our animal experimental procedures were approved by the National Taiwan University College of Medicine and College of Public Health Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; Number 20150056). Approximately 1 × 106 scrambled PANC-1 cells and shBCL10-transfected PANC-1 cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of mice; and all mice received anesthesia with isoflurane/oxygen (2.5% isoflurane) for 5 min during injection of PANC-1 cells. Body weight and tumor volumes of mice were observed after implantation and measured once a week. Tumor volume was measured with calipers and calculated using the equation: 0.5 × L × W2, where L is the length and W is the width. At the endpoint of animal experiment, all mice were euthanized with asphyxiation using carbon dioxide (CO2) which introduced into the chamber at the rate of 30% replacement of chamber air per minute.

Patients, tumor samples, and immunohistochemical analyses

In order to reduce underlying drug resistance of different chemotherapies of bios, and the different chemotherapy regimen-associated responses and subsequent survival, we selected patients who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment after initial diagnosis of locally advanced and metastatic PDAC or at the status of recurrent and/or distant metastatic PDAC after curative surgery. Patients who were diagnosed only by cytological examination were excluded. We reviewed the medical records and histopathological data of patients with PDAC who met the aforementioned criteria. This cohort included adequate amounts of archival tissues, including biopsy or surgery (recurrent cases) for immunohistochemical evaluation, complete medical records documenting the disease course, and the histological diagnosis of PDAC. The study was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital (Institutional. Review Board Number: 201507023RINA).

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections (4 μm thick) were immunohistochemically stained using an avidin–biotin-peroxidase method as described previously [13]. The primary antibodies and their dilutions were as follows: anti-BCL10 (sc-9560; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-NF-κB p65 (sc-109, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). BCL10 and NF-κB nuclear expression were considered positive when more than 10% of tumor cells exhibited positively stained nuclei [13, 18].

Statistical analysis

The data from the WST-1 assays and cell cycle analysis are expressed as the mean ± SE of experiments repeated at least three times. Statistical analysis was determined using Student’s t test, Χ2 test, and Fisher’s exact test. The OS was measured from the date of the commencement of chemotherapy to the date of death from any cause or the last follow-up date. Univariate analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves (log-rank test) to evaluate the statistical significance of OS differences among patients with tumors either or not expressing nuclear BCL10. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Downregulation of BCL10 attenuates the proliferation of PDAC cells

To investigate the functions of BCL10 in PDAC cells, we first validated the localization of BCL10. The three PDAC cell lines were infected with BCL10 shRNA lentivirus, and then, assessed by western blot analysis. The data showed efficient knockdown of BCL10 after transfection with BCL10 shRNA (Fig. 1a). The immunofluorescence image from confocal microscopy showed that BCL10 was localized in nucleus and cytoplasm of all three PDAC cell lines (PANC-1, AsPC-1, and BxPC-3) (Fig. 1b). After transfection with BCL10 shRNA (shBCL10), the fluorescence intensity of BCL10 in cytoplasm and nucleus was markedly reduced in BxPC-3 cells, and BCL10 expression was mainly restricted to cytoplasm in PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Silencing of BCL10 in the cells of PDAC using short hairpin RNA (shRNA). a The shRNA-expression lentiviral vector of BCL10 (Clone ID: TRCN0000359256), specifically targets C-terminal region of BCL10, including Ser231 phosphorylation site (ACGTACTGTTTCACGACAATG). Three PDAC cell lines (PANC-1, AsPC-1, and BxPC-3) were infected with pGIPZ lentivirus (scrambled, Scr) and BCL10 shRNA lentivirus. The protein expression of β-actin and BCL10 was examined by western blot analysis. b Transfection with BCL10 shRNA (shBCL10) significantly decreased the levels of BCL10 in nucleus of three PDAC cell lines. Cells were labeled with anti-BCL10 primary antibody and DyLight 488 conjugated secondary antibody. The distribution of BCL10 was observed by immunofluorescence using confocal microscopy. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm. c shBCL10 transfected PDAC cells exhibited low proliferative ability. The control, scrambled, and shBCL10 transfected cells from PANC-1, AsPC-1, and BxPC-3 cell lines were plated at 1000 cells/well in 96-well plate respectively. Then, cell proliferation rate was evaluated using a Premixed WST-1 Cell Proliferation Reagent after every 2 days. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Full size image

We further examined whether the growth of PDAC cells was inhibited after BCL10 knockdown. As shown in Fig. 1c, transfection with shBCL10 significantly reduced cell proliferation in three PDAC cell lines. These results suggested that nuclear translocation of BCL10 may be a key event in the promotion of proliferation of these PDAC cells.

Downregulation of BCL10 causes cell cycle arrest and enhances the cytotoxicities of chemotherapeutic agents in PDAC cells

To investigate whether BCL10-mediated suppression of proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells is via the cell cycle arrest, we assessed the effects of shBCL10 transfection on cell cycle regulation in three PDAC cell lines. As shown in Fig. 2a, in KRAS mutant PDAC cells, PANC-1 and AsPC-1, there was a significant increase in the number of cells in the G2/M phase and significant decrease in the number of cells in the G1 phase. In the KRAS wild-type PDAC cell line, BxPC-3, we observed that there was a significant increase in the number of cells in the G1 phase and significant decrease in the number of cells in the G2/M phase (Fig. 2a). These findings indicated that knockdown of BCL10 differentially inhibited cell cycle progression in PDAC cell lines; G1 phase arrest was noted in wild-type KRAS cell lines, whereas G2/M phase arrest was noted in mutant KRAS cell lines.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Inhibition of BCL10 causes differential cell cycle arrest and increases drug sensitivity in PDAC cell lines. a shBCL10 resulted in G2/M phase arrest in PANC-1 and AsPC-1 cells, but caused G1 phase arrest in BxPC-3. b The cell survival analysis showed that shBCL10 transfection significantly increased a dose-dependent inhibition of cell viability to gemcitabine (GEMZAR) treatment in PANC-1, AsPC-1, and BxPC-3 cells. c Similarly, shBCL10 transfection significantly increased a dose-dependent inhibition of cell viability to oxaliplatin (Oxali) treatment in PANC-1, AsPC-1, and BxPC-3 cells. The results are expressed for triplicates in each treatment group and measured each week. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Full size image

We further evaluated whether PDAC cells are sensitive to conventional chemotherapy after silencing of BCL10 using shBCL10. The PDAC cell lines were treated with various doses of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for 72 h, respectively. The cytotoxicity assay showed that BCL10-silenced cells exhibited significantly lower cell survival rate compared with scrambled cells after treatment with the same drug doses of gemcitabine (Fig. 2b) and oxaliplatin (Fig. 2c) in the three PDAC cell lines.

Downregulation of BCL10 significantly decreases the expression of cell cycle-regulatory and NF-κB-related proteins, and inhibits NF-κB activation

It has previously been demonstrated that Cyclin D1 is involved in the G1 phase, while Cyclin E, and Cyclin A participate in the transition to the G1/S phase [32]. In contrast to G1/S phase, CDC2, CDC25C, and Cyclin B1 are involved in the G2/M phase [33]. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p27 regulate different stages of the cell cycle, including the G1 phase, and the transition of G1/S and G2/M phases by inhibiting the functions of the various CDK proteins as indicated [34,35,36]. In the regulation of G1 phase and G1/S transition, p21 and p27 preferentially inhibit the activation of the complex of CDK4/6/Cyclin D and CDK2/Cyclin E, and also restrains the activity of the interaction between CDK2 and Cyclin A, whereas in the regulation of G2/M phase progression, both p21 and p27 inhibit the activation of the CDK1/Cyclin B complex [34,35,36]; therefore, in this study, we assessed whether silencing BCL10 using shBCL10 can affect the cell cycle proteins that are involved in the G1 phase and G1/S transition, including Cyclin A, Cyclin D, Cyclin E, CDK2, CDK4, p21, and p27, and G2/M phase arrest, and in the transition of the G2/M phase, including CDC2, p-CDC2, CDC25C, p-CDC25C, Cyclin B1, p21, and p27, in BxPC3 and PANC-1 cells.

As shown in Fig. 3a, we found that in PANC-1 cells, shBCL10 transfection downregulated the expression of p-CDC2, p-CDC25C, and Cyclin B1, and upregulated the expression of p21 and p27, while the expression of CDK2 was not affected (Fig. 3a). In BxPC-3 (wild-type KRAS) cells, we revealed that shBCL10 downregulated the expression of Cyclin A, Cyclin D1, Cyclin E, CDK2, and CDK4, and upregulated the expression of p21 and p27, but did not affect the expression of Cyclin B (Fig. 3a). These results indicated that BCL10 inhibition can result in differential cell cycle arrest in the two different pancreatic cancer cell lines: mutant KRAS cell lines (G2/M arrest) and wild-type KRAS cell lines (G1 arrest).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Inhibition of BCL10 downregulates cell cycle proteins expression and NF-κB activation in PDAC cell lines. a In total cell lysates, transfection with shBCL10 downregulated the expression of p-CDC2, p-CDC25C, Cyclin B1 in PANC-1 cell lines and the expression of Cyclin A, E, and D1, CDK2, and CDK4 in BxPC-3 compared to scrambled (Scr) group and control (Con) group. When compared to scrambled (Scr) group and control (Con) group, shBCL10 transfection upregulated the expression of p21 and p27 in both PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells. b shBCL10 transfection decreased the expressions of BCL3, c-Myc, p-IκBα, and NF-κB (p65) compared to scrambled (Scr) group and control (Con) group in nuclear lysates of both PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells. c The results from three independent experiments using shBCL10-transfected PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells are presented as relative luciferase units (RLU) per milligram of protein (NF-κB-Luc promoter activity-luciferase assay) (**p < 0.01). d PANC-1 cells and BxPC-3 cells were treated with BAY117082 (2 µM) for 24 h and compared with vehicle (0.01% DMSO) treated groups. *p < 0.05; n = 3. e PANC-1 cells and BxPC-3 cells were treated as described in (d), the expressions of BCL10, BCL3, p-p65, and p65 in nuclear lysates of PANC-1 cells and BxPC-3 cells, and the expressions of Cyclin B1, Cyclin D1, and p21 in total lysates were determined by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Full size image

As shown in Fig. 3b, shBCL10 transfection inhibited the expression of nuclear BCL3 and p-IκBα, both of which are recognized as important regulators of NF-κB in both PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells. In addition, shBCL10 transfection downregulated nuclear expression of NF-κB (p65) and c-Myc in both PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells. As indicated by the results from the NF-κB-Luc promoter activity assay, the transcription of NF-κB-dependent genes, led by the nuclear translocation and DNA binding of NF-κB, was downregulated in both PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells after transfection with shBCL10 (Fig. 3c).

To confirm the role of BCL10-mediated activation of NF-κB in cell cycle regulation, we treated PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells with an NF-κB inhibitor, BAY117082 (2 µM), for 24 h; cell cycle distribution analysis, as shown in Fig. 3d, revealed that the inhibition of NF-κB did cause cell cycle arrest at G2/M in PANC-1 cells and at G1 arrest in BxPC-3 cells. As shown in Fig. 3e, we showed that expression of Cyclin B1 (PANC-1), Cyclin D1 (BxPC-3), and nuclear BCL10, BCL3, c-Myc, and p-p65 (both BxPC-3 and PANC-1) was downregulated after BAY117082 (an NF-κB inhibitor) treatment, while p21 was upregulated after BAY117082 treatment. However, BAY117082 did not affect the expression of Cyclin D1 in PANC-1 and the expression of Cyclin B1 in BxPC-3 cells. We concluded that BCL10, at least in part, regulates the growth and the cell cycles progression of PDAC cells via NF-κB-dependent signaling.

Inhibition of BCL10 expression reduces tumor growth of PDAC in a xenograft model

To assess the anti-tumor effect of BCL10 knockdown in PDAC xenograft model, PANC-1 cells treated with or without shBCL10 transfection were inoculated into the flanks of mice. Tumor volume was recorded from appearance of initial tumor burden (Fig. 4a and b). When compared with scrambled group of PANC-1 xenograft tumors, we observed that the tumor growth was significantly inhibited after transfection with shBCL10 (Fig. 4a). The shBCL10-transfected group exhibited 78% reduction of tumor volume compared with scrambled group at 5 weeks (Fig. 4b). There were no significant differences in the body weight between scrambled PANC-1 group and shBCL10-transfected PANC-1 group (Fig. 4c). The nuclear expression levels of BCL10, BCL3, and NF-κB (p65) in tumor cells were also downregulated in shBCL10-transfected PANC-1 group when compared with scrambled PANC-1 group (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Silencing of BCL10 significantly inhibited tumor growth of PDAC in a xenograft model. a Approximately 1 × 106 scrambled (Scr) PANC-1 cells and shBCL10-treated PANC-1 cells were implanted subcutaneously into both flanks of NOD/SCI D mice. Representative image shows that the xenograft tumor size was suppressed in shBCL10-treated group. Mice were sacrificed 6 weeks after implantation. Scale bar: 10 mm. b The shBCL10-treated group resulted in 78% reduction of xenograft tumor volume compared with scrambled group. The results of tumor volume are expressed as n = 6 in each treatment group and measured each week. ***p < 0.001, compared to scrambled group. c There is almost no difference in body weight between scrambled group and shBCL10-transfected group. d The expression patterns of BCL10, BCL3, and NF-κB in tumor samples of PANC-1-xenograft model (upper panel, scrambled group; lower panel, shBCL10-treated group). PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Full size image

Nuclear expression of BCL10 in clinical sample is closely associated with the poor overall survival of patients with recurrent, advanced, and metastatic PDAC

The patients’ clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age for all the patients was 59 years old (range: 27–82) and all patients had histologically confirmed PDAC. Approximately one third of the patients (49 of 136 cases, 36%) had a history of smoking tobacco. Of 136 patients, 80 patients (58.8%) were initially diagnosed with stage IV pancreatic cancer, and the most common metastatic sites were liver, whereas 19 patients had locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Of 136 patients, 37 patients had local recurrence (n = 15) and/or distant metastasis (n = 22) after undergoing surgery with curative intent. After a median follow-up of 24.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.2–36.4 months], the median OS after commencing chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic PDAC or developing recurrence and/or distant metastasis of the entire group was 7.54 months (95% CI 6.11–8.98 months).

Table 1 Clinicopathologic features between nuclear BCL10-negative and nuclear BCL10-positive groups of patients with PDAC
Full size table

The nuclear expression of BCL10 was detected in tumor cells of 58 patients (42.6%) (Fig. 5a–d). The difference in the demography, including age, sex, smoking history, and alcoholism were not significant between patients with nuclear BCL10 expression in tumors and those without nuclear BCL10 expression in tumors (Table 1). Of 136 patients, 96 patients (70.6%) with available response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy; however, patients without nuclear BCL10 expression did not exhibit better response (complete and partial remission) to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy than those with nuclear BCL10 expression [5/39 (12.8%) versus 6/57 (10.5%), p = 0.753]. Patients with nuclear BCL10 expression had significantly worse prognoses than those without nuclear BCL10 expression [median OS after starting chemotherapy: 6.90 months (95% CI 5.77–8.03) versus 9.53 months (95% CI 5.89–13.18), p = 0.019]. The 1-year OS rates for patients with nuclear BCL10 expression and for patients without nuclear BCL10 expression were 23.6% (95% CI 12.4–34.8%) and 43.7% (95% CI 32.1–55.3%), respectively (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression of nuclear BCL10 in tumor cells and its association with survival of patients with recurrent, advanced and metastatic PDAC. a Representative images of negative BCL10 expression in tumor specimens of PDAC. b Representative images of nuclear BCL10 expression in biopsy tumor specimens of PDAC. Right upper inset (nuclear expression of BCL10, 100X magnification). c Representative images of moderate nuclear BCL10 expression in tumor specimens of PDAC. d Representative images of strong nuclear BCL10 expression in tumor specimens of PDAC. Right upper inset (nuclear expression of BCL10, 40X magnification). e The Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS) for all patients associated with the expression of nuclear BCL10. f Inflammation-related signals in the tumor microenvironment of PDAC upregulates BCL10 expression and induces BCL10 nuclear translocation; BCL10 nuclear expression results in BCL3 nuclear translocation and the activation of NF-κB. The activation of NF-κB further triggers its regulating transcriptional factors, including c-Myc and cell cycle proteins, such as Cyclin D1 in wild-type KRAS PDAC, and Cyclin B1 in KRAS mutant PDAC. These signaling pathways further promote cell cycle progression, tumor progression, and contribute to chemotherapy resistance of PDAC. Inhibition of nuclear BCL10 translocation attenuates the activation of NF-κB, leading to the decreased expression of its regulatory cell cycle proteins, Cyclin D1 (wild-type KRAS) or Cyclin B1 (mutant KRAS), and the altered expression of p21, and thus fosters G1 arrest and G2/M arrest, respectively, and also enhances chemosensitivity and prolongs the survival of patients with PDAC. PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Full size image

Among 95 patients with available tissues to assess the expression of NF-κB (p65), we found that the nuclear BCL10 expression was significantly associated with nuclear NF-κB expression (p < 0.001, Table 1). Similarly, patients with nuclear NF-κB expression (n = 37) had a shorter OS than those without nuclear NF-κB expression (n = 58) [median survival: 6.50 months (95% CI 3.22–9.78) versus 9.90 months (95% CI 3.96–15.84), p = 0.025]. The 1-year OS rates for patients with nuclear NF-κB expression and for patients without nuclear NF-κB expression were 31.9% (95% CI 16.2–47.6%) and 46.5% (95% CI 32.6–53.6%), respectively.

Discussion

In the current study, we demonstrated that inhibition of BCL10 using shBCL10 significantly inhibited the cell proliferation of the three PDAC cell lines and the tumor growth of mice bearing PANC-1 xenograft tumors. The possible mechanisms of attenuation of cell proliferation of PDAC cells via downregulation of BCL10 are through arresting of cell cycle and inactivation of NF-κB-signaling. The biological significance of nuclear BCL10 expression was further validated in tumor cells of patients with advanced, metastatic, and recurrent and/or metastatic PDAC after curative surgery, in which the nuclear BCL10 expression significantly correlated with nuclear NF-κB expression and poor OS (after commencing chemotherapy) of these patients.

In contrast to hematological malignancies, such as MALT lymphoma [15, 18, 19], BCL10 was rarely found in the nucleus of solid tumors [21, 22]. In this study, BCL10 was expressed in cytoplasm as well as in nucleus of all three PDAC cell lines. After removal of Ser231 of BCL10, most of the BCL10 was localized in the cytoplasm of these PDAC cell lines. In addition, nuclear expression of BCL3 was downregulated after shBCL10 treatment. Furthermore, inhibition of BCL10 by shBCL10 transfection downregulates phosphorylation of IκBα and NF-κB (p65), and attenuates NF-κB activation and its regulated protein, c-Myc. In another study of natural killer T cell lymphoma, Chan et al. demonstrated that interleukin 2 triggered NF-κB activation via PI3K/AKT/BCL10/BCL3 signaling pathway, and that nuclear BCL10 expression was closely associated with NF-κB activation [37]. Ismail et al. also reported that in breast cancer cell line, T47D, nuclear BCL10 was subcellularly localized into the cytoplasm after transfection with siBCL10 [38]. These findings indicated that BCL10 may behave as a shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm in certain cancer cells, and the shuttling of BCL10 may be dependent on the inflammation-related NF-κB signaling and nuclear BCL3-associated export.

In pancreatic cancers, mutational activation of KRAS or alterations in PI3K regulation caused by phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss can enhance NF-κB activation and NF-κB-associated activation of downstream cytokine genes (including c-Myc and Cyclin D1) [39,40,41,42,43], and thus, contribute to progression of these tumors. These findings were in corroboration of current study showing the vital role of nuclear BCL10 in mediating activation of the NF-κB and its downstream gene, c-Myc, and in contributing to poor prognosis.

In this study, we also assessed whether nuclear BCL10 expression correlated with KRAS mutation in patients with locally advanced and metastatic PDAC. We revealed that among 75 cases of PDAC, KRAS mutations in codon 12 (exon 2) were detected in 63 (84%) patients, and nuclear BCL10 expression was not associated with the KRAS mutation [KRAS mutant cases: positive nuclear BCL10 expression rate was found to be 49.2% (31/63) versus KRAS wild-type case: positive nuclear BCL10 expression rate was found to be 33.3% (4/12), p = 0.302] (Additional file 2: Table S1). These findings indicate that nuclear BCL10 expression may participate in the molecular pathogenesis of PDAC in both mutant KRAS and wild-type KRAS PDAC cells.

In this study, we demonstrated that BCL10 inhibition can result in differential cell cycle arrest in the two different pancreatic cancer cell lines: mutant KRAS cell lines (G2/M arrest) and wild-type KRAS cell lines (G1 arrest). The possible mechanisms why the inhibition of BCL10 can contribute to different cell cycle arrests in mutant KRAS and wild-type KRAS PDAC cell lines may be resulted from the following clues. In contrast to wild-type KRAS PDAC, activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling was predominant in KRAS mutant PDAC [30, 31]. Previous studies have suggested that persistent activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling may cause the progression of the G2/M transition in PDAC cells [44, 45]. In 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA)-implantation-induced pancreatic cancer rats, in which the oncogenesis of pancreatic cancer (PC) is mainly triggered by the KRAS mutation-related signaling pathway [46], Guo et al. revealed that Cyclin B1 was upregulated in the DMBA-treated group when compared with the NaCl crystal-treated group through oligonucleotide microarray approaches [47]. In an analysis of the association between Cyclin B1 expression and the prognosis of 241 patients with PC, Zhou et al. showed that patients with tumors expressing high levels of Cyclin B1 (grade 2, > 30% positive immunostaining) had a poorer median overall survival than those with low-level expression of Cyclin B1 (12.4 months versus 22.8 months, p = 0.01) [48]. In human samples of PC, Ito et al. showed that cell division cycle (CDC)2 expression was significantly higher in pancreatic adenocarcinoma than in intraductal or cystic adenocarcinoma [31/50 (54.8%) versus 3/13 (23.1%), p = 0.0418], and the overexpression of CDC2 was also demonstrated to be closely associated with lymph node metastasis and a high Ki-67 labeling index in these patients with PC [49]. Our current findings showed that inhibition of BCL10 downregulated the expression of Cyclin B1, p-CDC2, and p-CDC25C in the KRAS mutant PDAC cell line, PANC-1, indicating that BCL10 may be involved in the regulation of important checkpoints that regulate cell cycle progression at the G2/M transition in KRAS mutant PDAC.

It was noted that knockdown of BCL10 by shBCL10 in the wild-type KRAS cell line, BxPC-3, resulted in the decreased expression of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and cyclins that control the process of G1 phase and G1/S transition, such as Cyclin D1, Cyclin E, CDK2, CDK4, and Cyclin A. We also found that the inhibition of NF-κB by BAY117082 caused cell cycle arrest in G1, downregulation of Cyclin D1 expression, and upregulation of p21 expression in BxPC-3 cells but did not affect Cyclin B1, indicating that BCL10 is involved in the activation of NF-κB and its regulated cell cycle protein, Cyclin D1, in wild-type KRAS PDAC. These results support our previous finding that inhibition of BCL10 with BCL10 small interfering RNA caused G1 cell cycle arrest in four human cervical cancer cell lines, C33A, HeLa, SiHa, and CaSki, in which all were wild-type KRAS, and silencing BCL10 in SiHa cells significantly downregulated Cyclin D1 expression and the activation of NF-κB [21]. Previous studies have also demonstrated that Cyclin D1 overexpression is closely associated with the poor prognosis in post-operative pancreatic cancer patients [50, 51]. Further exploration of the association between Cyclin D1 expression and the nuclear expression pattern of BCL10 in patients with wild-type KRAS PDAC is required.

In addition to wild-type KRAS PDAC cell lines, we revealed that BAY11708, an NF-κB inhibitor, downregulated Cyclin B1, upregulated p21, and caused G2/M phase arrest, but did not affect Cyclin D1 in KRAS mutant PDAC cell lines (PANC-1). Using an in vitro BRL-3A rat liver cell model, Zhang et al. showed that Cyclin B1, a downstream molecule of NF-κB, was stimulated through activation of recombinant rat IL-18-triggering NF-κB signaling [52]. Further investigation of the association between NF-κB and Cyclin B1 and the biological functions of NF-κB/Cyclin B1 signaling in KRAS mutant PDAC are warranted.

In addition to the diverse suppression of CDKs and cyclins in different mutant KRAS and wild-type KRAS PDAC cell lines, we found that inhibition of BCL10 upregulated the expression of p21 and p27 in both mutant KRAS and wide-type KRAS PDAC cell lines, suggesting that BCL10 may participate in the regulation of or affect the function of p21 and p27, both regulating cell cycle progression at the G1/S and G2/M boundary, and thus contribute to the progression and drug resistance of PDAC. In an in vitro cell line study, Yadav et al. showed that gatifloxacin enhances the cytotoxicities of gemcitabine in two KRAS mutant PDAC cell lines, MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1, through upregulation of p21 and p27 expression and subsequent blocking of G1/S phase progression [53]. A previous study showed that p21 was significantly associated with NF-κB activation and was involved in the regulation of the G2/M phase cell cycle in T-cell leukemic cell lines [54]. Our findings revealed that inhibition of NF-κB by BAY117082 upregulated the expression of p21 in both PDAC cell lines, supporting our findings that inhibition of BCL10 attenuated NF-κB activation and further increased p21 expression, thus blocking cell cycle progression in the G1/S phase (BxPC-3) and G2/M phase (PANC-1), respectively. Taken together, our results suggest that BCL10 may be involved in the activation of NF-κB signaling and its regulated cell cycle proteins and the alteration of p21 and p27, thus controlling different cell cycle transitions and further promoting cell proliferation and progression in different types of KRAS in PDAC cells (Fig. 5f).

The association between nuclear BCL10 expression and patients’ prognosis has been demonstrated in a variety of hematologic malignancies, including our and other investigators’ studies showing Helicobacter pylori-independence (lack of tumor regression after antibiotics treatment) of gastric lymphoma [18, 19, 55,56,57], the short failure-free survival in ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma [58], and locally aggressive tumors in cutaneous MALT lymphoma [59]. Holzmann et al. reported that higher mRNA expression of BCL10 was detected in eight pancreatic cancer cell lines and in all analyzed pancreatic cancer tissues, including primary tumors and surgical margins, indicating a role of BCL10 in the molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer [60].

Previous studies have demonstrated that activation of NF-κB results in significant resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents, including gemcitabine and oxaliplatin [24, 61]. Our in vitro study showed that inhibition of BCL10, using shBCL10, might enhance cytotoxicities of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Furthermore, we revealed the significant correlation between nuclear expression of BCL10 and poor OS in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. These findings indicated that BCL10 may be a potential target for treating locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Conclusions

In the present study, we found that BCL10 residing in the cytoplasm and nucleus of PDAC cells relays inflammation-mediated signals to activate NF-κB, and that nuclear BCL10 expression is associated with poor prognosis of patients with locally advanced and metastatic PDAC. These findings suggested that nuclear BCL10 may act as an important factor for promoting cell proliferations and chemoresistance, and thus, for increasing aggressiveness of PDAC cells. Further study of the biological significance of nuclear BCL10 in mediating NF-κB activation and in differentially regulating cell cycle proteins in PDAC cells can help us in developing novel BCL10-related therapeutic strategies for this subgroup of tumors.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PDAC:

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Shh:

Sonic hedgehog (Shh)

NF-κB:

Nuclear factor-κappa B

OS:

Overall survival

BCL10:

B-cell CLL/lymphoma 10

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)

RPMI:

Roswell Park Memorial Institute

shRNA:

Short hairpin RNA

shBCL10:

BCL10 shRNA transfected

SE:

Standard error

Scr:

Scrambled

Con:

Control

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PI:

Propidium iodide

CDK:

Cyclin-dependent kinases

CDC:

Cell division cycle

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

PAGE:

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PVDF:

Polyvinylidene difluoride

p:

Phospho

IACUC:

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

CI:

Confidence interval

PTEN :

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

RLU:

Relative luciferase units

GEMZAR:

Gemcitabine

Oxali:

Oxaliplatin

References

  1. Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1605–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kane GM, Knox JJ. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an emerging entity. Curr Probl Cancer. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morganti AG, Massaccesi M, La Torre G, Caravatta L, Piscopo A, Tambaro R, et al. A systematic review of resectability and survival after concurrent chemoradiation in primarily unresectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(1):194–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Makris EA, MacBarb R, Harvey DJ, Poultsides GA. Surrogate end points for overall survival in metastatic, locally advanced, or unresectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(8):2371–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang SH, Kuo YH, Tien YW, Hsu C, Hsu CH, Kuo SH, et al. Inferior survival of advanced pancreatic cancer patients who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy but did not participate in clinical trials. Oncology. 2011;81(3–4):143–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Merl MY, Abdelghany O, Li J, Saif MW. First-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: can we do better? Highlights from the ‘2010 ASCO Annual Meeting’. Chicago, IL, USA. June 4–8, 2010. JOP. 2010;11(4): 317–20.

  7. Cid-Arregui A, Juarez V. Perspectives in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(31):9297–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hajatdoost L, Sedaghat K, Walker EJ, Thomas J, Kosari S. Chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Medicina. 2018;54(3):48.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Muñoz AR, Chakravarthy D, Gong J, Halff GA, Ghosh R, Kumar AP. Pancreatic cancer: current status and challenges. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2017;3(6):396–408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Melstrom LG, Salazar MD, Diamond DJ. The pancreatic cancer microenvironment: a true double agent. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116(1):7–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kasperczyk H, Baumann B, Debatin KM, Fulda S. Characterization of sonic hedgehog as a novel NF-kappaB target gene that promotes NF-kappaB-mediated apoptosis resistance and tumor growth in vivo. FASEB J. 2009;23(1):21–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamasaki A, Kameda C, Xu R, Tanaka H, Tasaka T, Chikazawa N. Nuclear factor kappaB-activated monocytes contribute to pancreatic cancer progression through the production of Shh. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59(5):675–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang SH, Hsu CH, Lee JC, Tien YW, Kuo SH, Cheng AL. Nuclear expression of glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 and nuclear factor-κB is associated with a poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2013;85(2):86–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Willis TG, Jadayel DM, Du MQ, Peng H, Perry AR, Abdul-Rauf M, et al. Bcl10 is involved in t(1;14)(p22;q32) of MALT B cell lymphoma and mutated in multiple tumor types. Cell. 1999;96(1):35–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Du MQ. MALT lymphoma: Genetic abnormalities, immunological stimulation and molecular mechanism. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2017;30(1–2):13–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thome M, Charton JE, Pelzer C, Hailfinger S. Antigen receptor signaling to NF-kappaB via CARMA1, BCL10, and MALT1. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(9): a003004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Juilland M, Thome M. Role of the CARMA1/BCL10/MALT1 complex in lymphoid malignancies. Curr Opin Hematol. 2016;23(4):402–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeh KH, Kuo SH, Chen LT, Mao TL, Doong SL, Wu MS, et al. Nuclear expression of BCL10 or nuclear factor kappa B helps predict Helicobacter pylori-independent status of low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas with or without t(11;18)(q21;q21). Blood. 2005;106(3):1037–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuo SH, Tsai HJ, Lin CW, Yeh KH, Lee HW, Wei MF, et al. The B-cell-activating factor signalling pathway is associated with Helicobacter pylori independence in gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma without t(11;18)(q21;q21). J Pathol. 2017;241(3):420–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeh PY, Kuo SH, Yeh KH, Chuang SE, Hsu CH, Chang WC, et al. A pathway for tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced Bcl10 nuclear translocation. Bcl10 is up-regulated by NF-kappaB and phosphorylated by Akt1 and then complexes with Bcl3 to enter the nucleus. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(1):167–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuo SH, Chou CH, Cheng AL, Wang CW, Chen YH, Chen RJ. Expression of BCL10 in cervical cancer has a role in the regulation of cell growth through the activation of NF-κB-dependent cyclin D1 signaling. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(2):245–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hosoda W, Sasaki E, Murakami Y, Yamao K, Shimizu Y, Yatabe Y. BCL10 as a useful marker for pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma, especially using endoscopic ultrasound cytology specimens. Pathol Int. 2013;63(3):176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weichert W, Boehm M, Gekeler V, Bahra M, Langrehr J, Neuhaus P, et al. High expression of RelA/p65 is associated with activation of nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent signaling in pancreatic cancer and marks a patient population with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(4):523–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Q, Yang G, Feng M, Zheng S, Cao Z, Qiu J, et al. NF-κB in pancreatic cancer: its key role in chemoresistance. Cancer Lett. 2018;421:127–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Delpu Y, Hanoun N, Lulka H, Sicard F, Selves J, Buscail L, et al. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Curr Genom. 2011;12(1):15–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bournet B, Buscail C, Muscari F, Cordelier P, Buscail L. Targeting KRAS for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of pancreatic cancer: hopes and realities. Eur J Cancer. 2016;54:75–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang MC, Chang YT, Wu MS, Shun CT, Tien YW, Lin JT. K-ras mutation at codon 12 in stage I pancreatic adenocarcinoma: analysis by laser capture microdissection and direct sequencing. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100(5):352–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei S, Liang Z, Gao J, Wu S, Zhu H, Liu H, Liu T. Patterns of K-ras codon 12 and 13 mutations found in pancreatic adenocarcinoma of 30 Chinese patients by microdissection, PCR and direct sequencing. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20(1):67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang JY, Lian ST, Chen YF, Yang YC, Chen LT, Lee KT, Huang TJ, Lin SR. Unique K-ras mutational pattern in pancreatic adenocarcinoma from Taiwanese patients. Cancer Lett. 2002;180(2):153–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mann KM, Ying H, Juan J, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. KRAS-related proteins in pancreatic cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;168:29–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Buscail L, Bournet B, Cordelier P. Role of oncogenic KRAS in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(3):153–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vermeulen K, Van Bockstaele DR, Berneman ZN. The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Prolif. 2003;36(3):131–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang Y, Sramkoski RM, Jacobberger JW. The kinetics of G2 and M transitions regulated by B cyclins. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12): e80861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Abukhdeir AM, Park BH. P21 and P27: roles in carcinogenesis and drug resistance. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2008;10: e19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Karimian A, Ahmadi Y, Yousefi B. Multiple functions of p21 in cell cycle, apoptosis and transcriptional regulation after DNA damage. DNA Repair. 2016;42:63–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Abbastabar M, Kheyrollah M, Azizian K, Bagherlou N, Tehrani SS, Maniati M, Karimian A. Multiple functions of p27 in cell cycle, apoptosis, epigenetic modification and transcriptional regulation for the control of cell growth: a double-edged sword protein. DNA Repair. 2018;69:63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chan KK, Shen L, Au WY, Yuen HF, Wong KY, Guo T, et al. Interleukin-2 induces NF-kappaB activation through BCL10 and affects its subcellular localization in natural killer lymphoma cells. J Pathol. 2010;221(2):164–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ismail IH, Dronyk A, Hu X, Hendzel MJ, Shaw AR. BCL10 is recruited to sites of DNA damage to facilitate DNA double-strand break repair. Cell Cycle. 2016;15(1):84–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Z, Banerjee S, Ahmad A, Li Y, Azmi AS, Gunn JR, et al. Activated K-ras and INK4a/Arf deficiency cooperate during the development of pancreatic cancer by activation of Notch and NF-κB signaling pathway. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6): e20537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chiao PJ, Ling J. Kras, Pten, NF-κB, and inflammation: dangerous liaisons. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(2):103–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ying H, Elpek KG, Vinjamoori A, Zimmerman SM, Chu GC, Yan H, et al. PTEN is a major tumor suppressor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and regulates an NF-κB-cytokine network. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(2):158–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Asano T, Yao Y, Zhu J, Li D, Abbruzzese JL, Reddy SA. The PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway is activated due to aberrant Pten expression and targets transcription factors NF-kappaB and c-Myc in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004;23(53):8571–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Biliran H Jr, Wang Y, Banerjee S, Xu H, Heng H, Thakur A, et al. Overexpression of cyclin D1 promotes tumor cell growth and confers resistance to cisplatin-mediated apoptosis in an elastase-myc transgene-expressing pancreatic tumor cell line. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(16):6075–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Grabocka E, Pylayeva-Gupta Y, Jones MJ, Lubkov V, Yemanaberhan E, Taylor L, et al. Wild-type H- and N-Ras promote mutant K-Ras-driven tumorigenesis by modulating the DNA damage response. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(2):243–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang F, Li H, Yan XG, Zhou ZW, Yi ZG, He ZX, et al. Alisertib induces cell cycle arrest and autophagy and suppresses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition involving PI3K/Akt/mTOR and sirtuin 1-mediated signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancer cells. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:575–601.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Z’graggen K, Warshaw AL, Werner J, Graeme-Cook F, Jimenez RE, Castillo CF-D. Promoting effect of a high-fat/high-protein diet in DMBA-induced ductal pancreatic cancer in rats. Ann Surg. 2001;233(5):688–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Guo JC, Li J, Yang YC, Zhou L, Zhang TP, Zhao YP. Oligonucleotide microarray identifies genes differentially expressed during tumorigenesis of DMBA-induced pancreatic cancer in rats. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12): e82910.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou L, Li J, Zhao YP, Cui QC, Zhou WX, Guo JC, et al. The prognostic value of cyclin B1 in pancreatic cancer. Med Oncol. 2014;31(9):107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ito Y, Takeda T, Wakasa K, Tsujimoto M, Okada M, Matsuura N. Expression of the G2-M modulators in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreatology. 2002;2(2):138–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bachmann K, Neumann A, Hinsch A, Nentwich MF, El Gammal AT, Vashist Y, et al. Cyclin D1 is a strong prognostic factor for survival in pancreatic cancer: analysis of CD G870A polymorphism, FISH and immunohistochemistry. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(3):316–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Sakellariou S, Filippakis GM, Zagouri F, Vlachodimitropoulos D, et al. Cyclin D1, p16(INK) (4A) and p27(Kip1) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessing prognostic implications through quantitative image analysis. APMIS. 2014;122(12):1230–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang J, Pan C, Xu T, Niu Z, Ma C, Xu C. Interleukin 18 augments growth ability via NF-kappaB and p38/ATF2 pathways by targeting cyclin B1, cyclin B2, cyclin A2, and Bcl-2 in BRL-3A rat liver cells. Gene. 2015;563(1):45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yadav V, Sultana S, Yadav J, Saini N. Gatifloxacin induces S and G2-phase cell cycle arrest in pancreatic cancer cells via p21/p27/p53. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10): e47796.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Wuerzberger-Davis SM, Chang PY, Berchtold C, Miyamoto S. Enhanced G2-M arrest by nuclear factor-{kappa}B-dependent p21waf1/cip1 induction. Mol Cancer Res. 2005;3(6):345–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kuo SH, Chen LT, Yeh KH, Wu MS, Hsu HC, Yeh PY, et al. Nuclear expression of BCL10 or nuclear factor kappa B predicts Helicobacter pylori-independent status of early-stage, high-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(17):3491–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ye H, Gong L, Liu H, Ruskone-Fourmestraux A, de Jong D, Pileri S, et al. Strong BCL10 nuclear expression identifies gastric MALT lymphomas that do not respond to H pylori eradication. Gut. 2006;55(1):137–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu H, Ye H, Dogan A, Ranaldi R, Hamoudi RA, Bearzi I, et al. T(11;18)(q21;q21) is associated with advanced mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma that expresses nuclear BCL10. Blood. 2001;98(4):1182–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Franco R, Camacho FI, Caleo A, Staibano S, Bifano D, De Renzo A, et al. Nuclear bcl10 expression characterizes a group of ocular adnexa MALT lymphomas with shorter failure-free survival. Mod Pathol. 2006;19(8):1055–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gallardo F, Bellosillo B, Espinet B, Pujol RM, Estrach T, Servitje O, et al. Aberrant nuclear BCL10 expression and lack of t(11;18)(q21;q21) in primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(7):867–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Holzmann K, Kohlhammer H, Schwaenen C, Wessendorf S, Kestler HA, Schwoerer A, et al. Genomic DNA-chip hybridization reveals a higher incidence of genomic amplifications in pancreatic cancer than conventional comparative genomic hybridization and leads to the identification of novel candidate genes. Cancer Res. 2004;64(13):4428–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Banerjee S, Kaseb AO, Wang Z, Kong D, Mohammad M, Padhye S, et al. Antitumor activity of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is augmented by thymoquinone in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69(13):5575–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Cancer Registry, Office of Medical Records, National Taiwan University Hospital for providing the necessary patient information.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, No. MOST 109-2314-B-002-200-, No. MOST 109-2811-B-002-565-, No. MOST 110-2314-B-002-219-MY3, No. MOST 110-2811-B-002-576-, and No. MOST 110-2314-B-002-278-; and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan, No. NTUH 110-S4965

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7, Chung-Shan S Rd, Taipei, Taiwan

    Sung-Hsin Kuo, Shih-Hung Yang, Ming-Feng Wei, Hsiao-Wei Lee, Ann-Lii Cheng & Kun-Huei Yeh

  2. Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

    Yu-Wen Tien

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

    Ann-Lii Cheng

  4. Cancer Research Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

    Sung-Hsin Kuo, Shih-Hung Yang, Ann-Lii Cheng & Kun-Huei Yeh

  5. Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

    Sung-Hsin Kuo, Shih-Hung Yang, Ming-Feng Wei, Hsiao-Wei Lee, Ann-Lii Cheng & Kun-Huei Yeh

  6. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

    Shih-Hung Yang & Kun-Huei Yeh

  7. Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

    Ann-Lii Cheng

Authors
  1. Sung-Hsin Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shih-Hung Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ming-Feng Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hsiao-Wei Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu-Wen Tien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ann-Lii Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kun-Huei Yeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SHK participated in the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. SHY treated patients, analyzed data of K-RAS mutation, and provided the tissue samples of patients. MFW participated in the experiments, performed animal study, and analyzed the data. HWL participated in the experiments, and analyzed the data. YWT treated patients and provided the tissue samples of patients. ALC analyzed and interpreted the data. KHY designed and supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun-Huei Yeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital (Institutional. Review Board Number: 201507023RINA). The animal experimental procedures were approved by the National Taiwan University College of Medicine and College of Public Health Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; Number 20150056).

Consent for publication

All listed authors discussed results and commented on the submitted manuscript.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest statement.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The mRNA and amino acid sequences of BCL10.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

The association between K-RAS mutation status and the expression pattern of nuclear BCL10 in 75 patients of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, SH., Yang, SH., Wei, MF. et al. Contribution of nuclear BCL10 expression to tumor progression and poor prognosis of advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by activating NF-κB-related signaling. Cancer Cell Int 21, 436 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-02143-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-02143-z

Keywords

  • Pancreatic cancer
  • BCL10
  • NF-κB
  • Prognosis

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us