Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Primary research
  • Open access
  • Published:

OTU deubiquitinase 4 is silenced and radiosensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells via inhibiting DNA repair

Cancer Cell International volume 19, Article number: 99 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Radiotherapy is becoming one major therapeutics for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Identifying novel radiosensitizers will greatly increase the efficacy of radiotherapy and benefit more patients. OTU deubiquitinase 4 (OTUD4) has been reported involved in DNA damage repair pathways and could be a potential target for chemotherapy therapy. This study aimed to investigate the roles of OTUD4 in regulation of radiosensitivity of NSCLC via modulating DNA repair.

Methods

The expression of OTUD4, γ-H2Ax and ATM/CHK2/p53 pathway-related signaling molecules were detected by Western blotting and QRT-PCR. The methylation of OTUD4 promoter was investigated by 5-aza-deoxycytidine treatment, methylation-specific PCR and bisulfite genomic sequencing assays. Radiosensitivity was assessed by the clonogenic formation assay. Cell cycle, cell apoptosis were analyzed by flow cytometry. DNA damage and repair were determined by comet assay, γ-H2Ax foci staining and flow cytometry.

Results

OTUD4 is dramatically downregulated in NSCLC and its downregulation significantly correlates with poor prognosis of NSCLC patients. Promoter hypermethylation is responsible for the loss of OTUD4 expression in NSCLC cells. Overexpression of OTUD4 increases radiosensitivity of NSCLC cells exhibiting as impaired clonogenic formation ability, enhanced cell cycle arrest and increased cell apoptosis. Moreover, molecular mechanism study reveals that OTUD4 radiosensitizs NSCLC cells via ATM/CHK2/P53 signaling and inhibiting homology-directed repair of DNA double strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation.

Conclusions

This study uncovers a tumor-suppressing role of OTUD4 and that OTUD4 is a potential radiosensitizer for NSCLC.

Background

Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer related death, with an estimated over 1.8 million new cases and 1.5 million deaths world widely in 2012 [1]. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the main histological type of lung cancer, which accounts for nearly 85% of all cases of lung cancer [2]. Thus, it is a big challenge to fight against NSCLC. Radiotherapy is becoming more and more important for treatment of NSCLC. Recent years, radiotherapy, especially stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), achieved promising benefit for NSCLC patients [3]. However, radioresistance hinders further improving efficacy of radiotherapy and results in treatment failure in patients. Therefore, elucidating the mechanism of radioresistance and finding/developing effective radiosensitizer are very important.

The primary effect of ionizing radiation (IR) is bringing damages to cellular DNA directly and indirectly [4]. Upon DNA damage, ATM is quickly recruited to the DSBs sites in an MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex dependent way, and subsequently activated via autophosphorylation [5]. The histone variant H2AX is phosphorylated by activated ATM at serine 139 residue. Phosphorylated H2AX (termed γ-H2AX) then incorporates into nucleosomes instead of the core histone at the DNA damage sites, which can spread about 2 megabases of chromatin region or thousands of nucleosomes and formed nuclear foci when stained with specific antibody [6]. γ-H2AX recognizing antibodies have become a gold standard for detecting the presence of DSBs [7, 8]. In addition to H2AX, activated ATM phosphorylates lots of other proteins involved in DNA damage response (DDR) and repair signaling pathways, such as cell cycle check point, DNA repair, apoptosis, and so forth.

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are considered the most cytotoxic type of DNA lesion induced by IR. Homologous recombination (HR) repair is important for DSBs precise repair. Modulating factors that are essential for HR affects sensitivity to ionizing radiation [9, 10]. OTUD4 has been reported to take part in DNA damage repair pathways including GG-NER and alkylation damage repair pathway [11, 12]. Moreover, knockdown of OTUD4 significantly increased the sensitivity of PC-3 and H23 tumor cells to methyl methanesulfonate, an alkylating agent which leads to DNA alkylation damage [12]. Hence, OTUD4 could be a potential target for cancer therapy via regulating DNA damage repair. However, whether OTUD4 participates in DSBs repair, especially HR, and modulates radiosensitivity of cancer cells remain to be elucidated.

In this study, we find that OTUD4 is significantly downregulated in NSCLC cell lines and patient specimens. Promoter methylation accounts for the depression of OTUD4 in NSCLC. Decreased expression of OTUD4 significantly correlates with poor prognosis of NSCLC patients. Moreover, overexpression of OTUD4 could increase radiosensitivity as evidenced by impaired clonogenic formation ability, increased cell cycle arrest and enhanced cell death after ionizing radiation treatment. Further investigation proved that OTUD4 inhibit DSBs homology repair (HR). Together, this study implicates that OTUD4 is a potential radiosensitizer for NSCLC.

Materials and methods

Patient tissue specimens

Patient consent and approval from the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Tianjin Cancer Institute and Hospital were obtained for the use of the clinical materials for research purposes. Ten primary NSCLC tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissue sample pairs were obtained from the Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Fresh tumor tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen in the operating room and then stored at − 80 °C. The tumor tissues were histopathologically and clinically diagnosed using both fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. All fresh samples were confirmed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining in frozen sections for the histopathological analysis.

Cell culture

Non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, including A549, H292, H460, H520, H1299, H1975 and PC-9, were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Rockville, MD, USA). 293FT cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco). DR-GFP-U2OS and EJ5-U2OS cell line [13, 14] were shared by Prof. Lei Shi’s laboratory at Tianjin Medical University and cultured in DMEM medium. The medium were supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Non-essential amino acids, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco). Lung bronchus epithelial cell line BEAS-2B was cultured in BEGM medium (Lonza).

Plasmids, transfection and stable cell line construction

OTUD4 was PCR amplified from cDNA of BEAS-2B cells with C-terminus flag-tagged and subcloned into the BamH I/SpeI sites of pSin-EF2-puro vector and validated by sequencing. Plasmids pSin-EF2-OTUD4, psPAX2 and pMD2.G were cotransfected into 293FT cells with Lipofectamine-2000 (Invitrogen) for virus package. Twenty-four and 48 h later, the virus-containing medium were collected, filtered and infected H460 and A549 cells daily. The infected cells were then selected with medium containing puromycin (1 μg/ml, Sigma) for at least 1 week and further maintained at medium containing low concentration of puromycin (0.5 μg/ml).

Western blotting and antibodies

Western blotting was conducted as previously reported [15]. The following antibodies were used: OTUD4 (#ABN477) was form Millipore; γ-H2AX (#9718), p-CHK2 (#2661), p53 (#2524), p21 (#2947), p-ATM (#5883) and Caspase-3 (#9662) were form Cell Signaling Technology; ATM (A1106) and α-tubulin (T9026) were from Sigma-Aldrich; CHK2 (sc-17747) and GAPDH (sc-365062) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription (RT) and real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega). FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche) was used for quantitative real-time PCR. Amplification and real-time analysis was performed with BioRad CFX96 system (BioRad). Primers were as following: OTUD4, forward 5′-AGACCCGAACCAAGCACAT-3′, and reverse 5′-CTGGCTTTTGTTCCGCA-3′; GAPDH, forward 5′-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGT CA-3′, and reverse 5′-TTGAGGTCAATGAAGGGGTC-3′. Transcript levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH levels. The relative mRNA levels were calculated according to the comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) method, where Ct represents the threshold cycle for each transcript.

Methylation specific PCR

Methylation specific PCR (MSP) was performed according to a previous study [16]. Briefly, Genomic DNA was extracted using TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN). 2 μg of genomic DNA was bisulfite-treated with EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen). Bisulphite-treated DNA was amplified using primers specific for either methylated or unmethylated DNA. The sequences of methylated-specific (M) primer and unmethylated-specific (U) primer for OTUD4 were: OTUD4 (M), forward 5′-CGTTACGGTTCGGAATAGGTAC-3′, reverse 5′-ACATAAAAACTACCGTCGA CGTC-3′; OTUD4 (U), forward 5′-TTGTTATGGTTTGGAATAGGTATGA-3′, reverse 5′-CAACATAAAAACTACCATCAACATC-3′.

Bisulfite genomic sequencing

Genomic DNA from different cells and patients’ tumor tissues were bisulfite-treated with the Epitect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen). Bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified with bisulfite-sequencing PCR (BSP) primers located in the OTUD4 promoter. The primers sequences were: forward, 5′-AGGGTTAGTTTTATATGGTTAGGT-3′, reverse, 5′-ACCTAAATCCTAAATCAAACAAC-3′. PCR products were purified and ligated into pMD19-T Vector System (Takara). Plasmids from single colonies were extracted and sequenced. At least 3 clones of each sample were selected for sequencing.

Cell clonogenic formation assay

The cell clonogenic formation assay was performed according to a previous report [17]. Briefly, cells were trypsinized and suspended. Then 200, 300, 1000, 5000, or 10000 H460 cells or 200, 300, 400, 1000 and 4000 A549 cells were seeded into 6-well cell culture plates in triplicates respectively. After attaching to the plates (6 to 8 h), the cells were treated with single-dose irradiation (0, 2, 4, 6, or 8 Gy). After incubated for about 2 weeks, cultures were fixed with pechiled methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The number of colonies with > 50 cells was counted under a dissecting microscope. The percentage of cell survival was calculated. The experiment conducted at least three times.

Cell cycle analysis

Cells were irradiated with 6 Gy dosage and allowed to recover for 12 h. Cells were fixed, stained with PI, and analyzed by flow cytometry as previous reported [18]. Thirty thousand cells were analyzed by using a FACS alibur instrument (BD Biosciences). The cell cycle distribution was assessed using ModFit LT 3.1 trial cell cycle analysis software. Representative images from three independent experiments are shown.

Single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay

Cells were irradiated and allowed to recover for 3 h prior to analysis. The single cell comet assays were carried using CometAssay Kit (4250-050-K, Trevigen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA damage was quantified for at least 50 cells for each experimental condition by determining percent of DNA in the tail relative to the total DNA using the software Open Comet_ImageJ.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Cells were trypsinized and seeded on coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lafayette, CO) in 24-well plate overnight. The next day cells were irradiated with single dose and allowed to recover for indicated time prior to analysis. Immunostaining was performed according to a previous report [15]. Anti-γH2AX (#9718, 1:200; Cell signaling Technology), anti-Rad51 (ab63801, Abcam) and species-specific FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500; Invitrogen) were used. Gray level images were acquired under a laser scanning microscope (Axio Imager.Z2, Carl Zeiss Co. Ltd.). Images were captured using the AxioVision Rel.4.6 computerized image analysis system. At least 50 cells were counted for quantification of γ-H2AX foci.

Homologous recombination reporter assay

4 × 10^5 DR-GFP-U2OS or EJ5-U2OS cells were seeded into 6-cm plates. Next day, 2 μg of pCMV-I-SceI [19] and 2 μg of pSin-EF2-OTUD4 or vector plasmid were cotransfected into cells using Lipofectamin-2000 (Invitrogen). Forty-eight hours later, GFP-positive cells was quantitated by flow cytometric analysis (FACS Calibur; BD Biosciences). Representative images from three independent experiments are shown.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Softare Inc.). Unless indicated otherwise, all results were presented as mean ± SD. Two-tailed, unpaired student’s t test was used for comparisons between groups for statistical significance. p < 0.05 in all cases was considered statistically significant.

Results

OTUD4 is downregulated in lung cancer and its downregulation associated with poor prognosis of patients with lung cancer

First, the expression of OTUD4 in non-small cell lung cancer was analyzed. OTUD4 was dramatically downregulated in NSCLC cell lines (Fig. 1a, b) and tumor tissues (Fig. 1c, d) compared with the lung bronchus epithelial cell BEAS-2B cells and the matched adjacent non-tumor tissues respectively in both protein and RNA level. Analysis of TCGA dataset showed that OTUD4 level was significantly depressed in both lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) tissues compared with normal lung tissues (Fig. 1e). Moreover, data form published lung cancer patient gene expression profiles (NCBI/GEO/GSE2514, n = 39) also indicated decreased expression of OTUD4 in tumor tissues. What’s more, assessment using the Kaplan–Meier Plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/index.php?p=service&cancer=lung) showed that downregulated OTUD4 significantly correlated with poorer overall survival (OS, HR = 0.56, logrank P = 1.2e−11), first progression survival (FPS, HR = 0.47, logrank P = 3.7e−9) and post progression survival (PPS, HR = 0.68, logrank P = 0.015) (Fig. 1g–i) in lung cancer. These data suggest that OTUD4 is tumor-suppressing and a novel prognostic biomarker for lung cancer.

Fig. 1
figure 1

OTUD4 is downregulated and associates with poor prognosis in NSCLC. Western blotting (a) and real-time PCR (b) analysis of the expression of OTUD4 in NSCLC cell lines. Western blotting (c) and real-time PCR (d) analysis of the expression of OTUD4 in paired adjacent non-tumor (NT) and tumor (T) tissues from NSCLC patients. e Expression level of OTUD4 in normal and tumor tissues of patients from the TCGA dataset. Error bars represent Median with interquartile range. N, normal. LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma. LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma. f Expression level of OTUD4 in normal (N) and tumor (T) tissues of patients from the GEO/GSE2514 dataset. Error bars represent Median with interquartile range. Kaplan–Meier analysis of the OS (g), FPS (h) and PPS (i) in lung cancer using Kaplan–Meier Plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/). OS, overall survival. FP, first progression. PPS, post progression survival. Tubulin served as loading control. *p < 0.05

Full size image

Hypermethylation in the promoter region accounts for depression of OTUD4

OTUD4 is downregulated of in NSCLC, then we explored the underlying mechanism. Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, play pivotal roles in regulating gene expression. A CpG islands rich region of human OTUD4 promoter was retrieved from the UCSC genome browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/, Fig. 2a), which suggested that promoter methylation might repressed OTUD4 expression. 5-Aza-dc, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, significantly promoted the expression of OTUD4, especially in cell lines with low levels of OTUD4, but not in the BEAS-2B cells (Fig. 2b). MSP assay showed that OTUD4 promoter genomic DNA was largely methylated in tumor tissues form 10 NSCLC patients (Fig. 2c). Moreover, BSP result showed that in these analyzed NSCLC cell lines and tissues the CpG islands in the OTUD4 promoter were hypermethylated (Fig. 2d). These data strongly suggested an essential role of promoter methylation in OTUD4 depression in NSCLC.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Promoter methylation is responsible for the loss of OTUD4 expression in NSCLC cells. a Schematic illustration of the arrangement of the promoter region and the region for BSP analysis. b Expression of OTUD4 mRNA in indicated cells treated with or without 5-Aza-dc. c Methylation specific PCR analysis of genomic DNA of tumor tissues from 10 patients. d Methylation status of promoter CpG islands from 3 individual clones analyzed by BSP. Error bars represent SD from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05. BSP, bisulfite genomic sequencing

Full size image

OTUD4 radiosensitizes NSCLC cells

Radiotherapy kills tumor cells by inducing lethal DNA damage and is one of the major therapeutics for lung cancer. It has been reported that OTUD4 involved in DNA repair [11, 12], thus we hypothesized that OTUD4 played a role in regulating radiosensitivity of NSCLC. Because OTUD4 was dramatically downregulated and hardly detected in NSCLC cell lines (Fig. 1a), we overexpressed OTUD4 in H460, A549 and PC-9 cells (Fig. 3a, b and Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). Clonogenic formation assay showed that overexpression of OTUD4 significantly decreased colonies formation efficiency after IR treatment (Fig. 3c, d and Additional file 1: Fig. S1B, C), which means that overexpression of OTUD4 did increase radiosensitivity of lung cancer cells. These data proved that OTUD4 could be a radiosensitizer of NSCLC.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Overexpression of OTUD4 increases radiosensitivity of NSCLC cells. Western blotting (a) and real-time PCR (b) validating overexpression of OTUD4 in indicated cells. c Representative images of cell clonogenic formation. d Statistical quantification of cell clonogenic formation of indicated cells treated with different dosage of IR. α-Tubulin served as loading control. Error bars represent SD from 3 independent experiments. n.s., non-specific. *p < 0.05

Full size image

Overexpression of OTUD4 promotes G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis

Next, we analyzed whether OTUD4 regulates the DNA damage responses to IR. Cell cycle analysis showed that overexpression of OTUD4 slightly increased cell percentage in G0/G1 phase (Additional file 2: Fig. S2A). Moreover, the proportion of cells with G2/M phase arrest was significantly increased in A549 and H446 cells with OTUD4 overexpression compared to vector control 12 h after irradiated (Fig. 4a). Additionally, upregulation of OTUD4 promoted cell death induced by IR, indicating by increased percentage of annexin V positive cells (Fig. 4b, c) and enhanced expression of active Caspase 3 (Cleaved Caspase 3, Fig. 4d), but not the untreated cells (Additional file 2: Fig. S2B and C). What’s more, increased expression of phosphorylated H2AX, ATM and CHK2 were noticed in OTUD4 overexpressed cells (Fig. 4e). P53 and its downstream gene p21, two major players in the apoptosis and cell cycle arrest responding to DNA damage, were also upregulated in OTUD4 overexpressed cells (Fig. 4e). Together, these findings revealed that OTUD4 enhanced G2/M arrest and apoptosis induced by IR in NSCLC cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

OTUD4 enhances cell cycle arrest and promotes cell apoptosis induced by IR. a Representative pictures of cell cycle distribution of indicated cells 12 h after irradiation. Representative images (b) and statistical quantification (c) of irradiation induced cell death analyzed by FACS. d Western blotting analysis of the expression of Caspase-3 and cleaved Caspase-3 in irradiated cells. e Western blotting analysis p-ATM, total ATM, p-CHK2, total CHK2, p53, p21 and γ-H2AX in indicated cells treated with or without irradiation. α-Tubulin and GAPDH served as loading control. Error bars represent SD from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05

Full size image

OTUD4 inhibits homology-directed DNA repair

DNA damage, especially DSBs, is the major cause of cell death induced by IR. Comet assay showed that A549 and H460 cells with OTUD4 overexpressed had significantly higher residual DNA damage relative to control cells (Fig. 5a, b). γ-H2AX foci, indicating DNA lesions, persist longer in radiosensitive cells than in radioresistant cells upon irradiation [20, 21]. After IR treatment, γ-H2AX foci were significantly increased and persisted longer in OTUD4 overexpressed cells than vector control cells (Additional file 3: Fig. S3A-B). Theas results suggested that OTUD4 impaired DNA repair efficiency of NSCLC cells.

Fig. 5
figure 5

OTUD4 inhibits DNA damage repair. Representative pictures (a) and quantification (b) of unrepaired DSB analyzed by comet assay 3 h after irradiation. Diagram (c) and homology repair efficiency (d) determined by FACS of DR-GFP-U2OS cells transfected with indicated plasmid. Representative pictures (e) and quantification (f) of Rad51 foci in vector and OTUD4 overexpressed cells treated with IR (6 Gy) and allowed recovering for 12 h. Scale bar, 10 μm. Error bars represent SD from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05

Full size image

DSBs is the main cause of cell death induced by IR. HR and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) are the two major ways to repair DSBs. Next, the effect of OTUD4 on HR and NHEJ DNA repair signaling was evaluated using DR-GFP U2OS and EJ5-U2OS reporter cells respectively [13, 14]. With these reporters, DSBs are introduced into the chromosome by expressing the I-SceI endonuclease (Fig. 5c and Additional file 3: Fig. S3C, E, F), and, if DSBs repaired, GFP is then expressed and subsequently quantified by flow cytometry. As shown, overexpression of OTUD4 resulted in a significant reduction of the percentage of GFP-positive cells in the DR-GFP U2OS but not that in the EJ5-U2OS reporter cells (Fig. 5d, Additional file 3: Fig. S3D), which indicated that OTUD4 inhibited DNA repair via HR signaling. Moreover, Rad51 staining confirmed that OTUD4 inhibited HR in NSCLC cells as indicated by less Rad51 foci in OTUD4 overexpressing cells after IR treatment (Fig. 5e, f).

Discussion

A previous study reported that OTUD4 homozygous mutation was found in patients with ataxia and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Knockdown of otud4 in zebrafish embryos induced defects in the eye, optic tectum, and cerebellum [22]. Up to date, this is the only report about deregulated OTUD4 in a pathological condition. Here, we report for the first time that deregulated OTUD4 associate with NSCLC. In this study, we found that OTUD4 was significantly downregulated in NSCLC cell lines and tumor tissues compared with normal controls (Fig. 1a–f). Analysis form Kaplan–Meier Plotter (http://kmplot.com) proves that the expression of OTUD4 positively correlates with the prognosis of NSCLC patients. Patients with lower OTUD4 expression show significantly shorter time of OS, FPS and PPS (Fig. 1g–i). These results indicate a tumor-suppressing role of OTUD4 the NSCLC.

OTUD4 has been reported to play multiple roles in DNA damage repair. Abigail Lubin and colleagues identified OTUD4 as a binding partner of XPC and modulating the ubiquitination of XPC [11]. XPC is an important positive regulator of NER [23, 24], thus they proposed that OTUD4 involved in NER. However, because ubiquitination of XPC had been proved both positively and negatively regulating NER [25,26,27], which might result from different type chain linkages of ubiquitination at different lysine residues, the exact role of OTUD4 in NER is not clear. By systematically analyzing, Yu Zhao et al. demonstrated that the OTUD4 could complex with USP7-USP9X. They proved that the OTUD4-USP7-USP9X complex was required for alkylation damage resistance and repair via promoting stability of ALKBH3, a demethylases for alkylation damage repair [12]. In our study, we find that OTUD4 could radiosensitize NSCLC cells by inhibiting the HR DNA repair signaling (Figs. 3 and 5), which broadened the role of OTUD4 in DNA damage repair.

OTUD4 was originally identified as a K48-specific deubiquitinase [28]. Very recently, Nima Mosammaparast et al. [29] proved that OTUD4 could switch to a K63-specific deubiquitinase upon phosphorylated near its catalytic domain. Numerous evidence have proved that ubiquitinase and deubiquitinase play important roles in DNA damage repair signaling transduction [30, 31]. According to a previous report, knockdown of OTUD4 increased the ubiquitination of XPC, which suggests the deubiquitinase activity of OTUD4 might be essential for NER [11]. Here, we show that OTUD4 inhibits HR repair (Fig. 5d, e). Yet, whether the deubiquitinase activity of OTUD4 involves in HR repair and what the exact mechanism is unexplored. Because K63 polyubiquitination plays pivotal roles in HR repair [32], we propose a hypothesis that OTUD4 might be phosphorylated by ATM and thus function as a K63-specific deubiquitinase to inhibit DSBs HR repair. Indeed, a SQ-rich region (aa334-aa458), which is characterized as the motif phosphorylated by ATM [33,34,35], is present in OTUD4 (data not shown). Nevertheless, Nima Mosammaparast et al. demonstrated that OTUD4 promotes alkylation damage repair by promoting stability of ALKBH3, which is independent on the deubiquitinase activity of OTUD4, but instead depends on the deubiquitinase activity of its interactors, USP7 and USP9X. Thus, OTUD4 might also function as an adapter and modulates HR repair signaling via other interactors. However, more investigations are needed to validate and uncover the underlying mechanisms.

Overall, in this study, we show that OTUD4 is silenced by promoter methylation and its downregulation correlates with poor prognosis in NSCLC. Overexpression of OTUD4 impairs DSBs HR repair, enhances cell cycle arrest and increases cell death induced that by IR. Our results suggest a tumor-suppressing function of OTUD4 and prove OTUD4 to be a potential target for radiosensitizing NSCLC.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data suggested that OTUD4 was downregulated in tissues and cells of NSCLC resulted from promoter hypermethylation. Downregulated OTUD4 correlated with poor prognosis of NSCLC patients. Ectopic overexpression of OTUD4 radiosensitized NSCLC cells via inhibiting HR repair of DSBs induced by IR, which further led to impaired clonogenic formation, enhanced cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Collectively, this study showed that OTUD4 was a potential novel therapeutic target against NSCLC.

Abbreviations

NSCLC:

non-small cell lung cancer

LUAD:

lung adenocarcinoma

LUSC:

lung squamous cell carcinoma

IR:

ionizing radiation

OTUD4:

OTU deubiquitinase 4

OS:

overall survival

PFS:

progression free survival

PPS:

post progression survival

DSBs:

DNA double strand breaks

HR:

homology recombination

GSEA:

gene set enrichment analysis

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramalingam SS, Owonikoko TK, Khuri FR. Lung cancer: new biological insights and recent therapeutic advances. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA, Mehran RJ, Louie AV, Balter P, Groen HJ, McRae SE, Widder J, Feng L, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):630–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahaney BL, Meek K, Lees-Miller SP. Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining. Biochem J. 2009;417(3):639–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature. 2003;421(6922):499–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(10):5858–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sedelnikova OA, Rogakou EP, Panyutin IG, Bonner WM. Quantitative detection of (125)IdU-induced DNA double-strand breaks with gamma-H2AX antibody. Radiat Res. 2002;158(4):486–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez-Capetillo O, Lee A, Nussenzweig M, Nussenzweig A. H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome. DNA Repair. 2004;3(8–9):959–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vispe S, Cazaux C, Lesca C, Defais M. Overexpression of Rad51 protein stimulates homologous recombination and increases resistance of mammalian cells to ionizing radiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26(12):2859–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Essers J, Hendriks RW, Swagemakers SM, Troelstra C, de Wit J, Bootsma D, Hoeijmakers JH, Kanaar R. Disruption of mouse RAD54 reduces ionizing radiation resistance and homologous recombination. Cell. 1997;89(2):195–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lubin A, Zhang L, Chen H, White VM, Gong F. A human XPC protein interactome—a resource. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;15(1):141–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao Y, Majid MC, Soll JM, Brickner JR, Dango S, Mosammaparast N. Noncanonical regulation of alkylation damage resistance by the OTUD4 deubiquitinase. EMBO J. 2015;34(12):1687–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang X, Li L, Liang J, Shi L, Yang J, Yi X, Zhang D, Han X, Yu N, Shang Y. Histone acetyltransferase 1 promotes homologous recombination in DNA repair by facilitating histone turnover. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(25):18271–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pierce AJ, Johnson RD, Thompson LH, Jasin M. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 1999;13(20):2633–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu Z, Zhao J, Qiu M, Mi Z, Meng M, Guo Y, Wang H, Yuan Z. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated GFP knock-in at the MAP1LC3B locus in 293FT cells is better for bona fide monitoring cellular autophagy. Biotechnol J. 2018;13(11):e1700674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koo GB, Morgan MJ, Lee DG, Kim WJ, Yoon JH, Koo JS, Kim SI, Kim SJ, Son MK, Hong SS, et al. Methylation-dependent loss of RIP3 expression in cancer represses programmed necrosis in response to chemotherapeutics. Cell Res. 2015;25(6):707–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2315–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin C, Wu Z, Lin X, Yu C, Shi T, Zeng Y, Wang X, Li J, Song L. Knockdown of FLOT1 impairs cell proliferation and tumorigenicity in breast cancer through upregulation of FOXO3a. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(10):3089–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Song L, Lin C, Wu Z, Gong H, Zeng Y, Wu J, Li M, Li J. miR-18a impairs DNA damage response through downregulation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(9):e25454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Olive PL, Banath JP. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX as a measure of radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58(2):331–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Taneja N, Davis M, Choy JS, Beckett MA, Singh R, Kron SJ, Weichselbaum RR. Histone H2AX phosphorylation as a predictor of radiosensitivity and target for radiotherapy. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(3):2273–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Margolin DH, Kousi M, Chan YM, Lim ET, Schmahmann JD, Hadjivassiliou M, Hall JE, Adam I, Dwyer A, Plummer L, et al. Ataxia, dementia, and hypogonadotropism caused by disordered ubiquitination. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):1992–2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sugasawa K, Ng JM, Masutani C, Iwai S, van der Spek PJ, Eker AP, Hanaoka F, Bootsma D, Hoeijmakers JH. Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex is the initiator of global genome nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell. 1998;2(2):223–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Riedl T, Hanaoka F, Egly JM. The comings and goings of nucleotide excision repair factors on damaged DNA. EMBO J. 2003;22(19):5293–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sugasawa K, Okuda Y, Saijo M, Nishi R, Matsuda N, Chu G, Mori T, Iwai S, Tanaka K, Tanaka K, et al. UV-induced ubiquitylation of XPC protein mediated by UV-DDB-ubiquitin ligase complex. Cell. 2005;121(3):387–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Poulsen SL, Hansen RK, Wagner SA, van Cuijk L, van Belle GJ, Streicher W, Wikstrom M, Choudhary C, Houtsmuller AB, Marteijn JA, et al. RNF111/Arkadia is a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase that facilitates the DNA damage response. J Cell Biol. 2013;201(6):797–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu L, Lee S, Zhang J, Peters SB, Hannah J, Zhang Y, Yin Y, Koff A, Ma L, Zhou P. CUL4A abrogation augments DNA damage response and protection against skin carcinogenesis. Mol Cell. 2009;34(4):451–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mevissen TE, Hospenthal MK, Geurink PP, Elliott PR, Akutsu M, Arnaudo N, Ekkebus R, Kulathu Y, Wauer T, El Oualid F, et al. OTU deubiquitinases reveal mechanisms of linkage specificity and enable ubiquitin chain restriction analysis. Cell. 2013;154(1):169–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao Y, Mudge MC, Soll JM, Rodrigues RB, Byrum AK, Schwarzkopf EA, Bradstreet TR, Gygi SP, Edelson BT, Mosammaparast N. OTUD4 is a phospho-activated K63 deubiquitinase that regulates MyD88-dependent signaling. Mol Cell. 2018;69(3):505–516 e505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kee Y, Huang TT. Role of deubiquitinating enzymes in DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36(4):524–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brinkmann K, Schell M, Hoppe T, Kashkar H. Regulation of the DNA damage response by ubiquitin conjugation. Front Genet. 2015;6:98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thorslund T, Ripplinger A, Hoffmann S, Wild T, Uckelmann M, Villumsen B, Narita T, Sixma TK, Choudhary C, Bekker-Jensen S, et al. Histone H1 couples initiation and amplification of ubiquitin signalling after DNA damage. Nature. 2015;527(7578):389–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(53):37538–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. O’Neill T, Dwyer AJ, Ziv Y, Chan DW, Lees-Miller SP, Abraham RH, Lai JH, Hill D, Shiloh Y, Cantley LC, et al. Utilization of oriented peptide libraries to identify substrate motifs selected by ATM. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(30):22719–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Traven A, Heierhorst J. SQ/TQ cluster domains: concentrated ATM/ATR kinase phosphorylation site regions in DNA-damage-response proteins. Bioessays. 2005;27(4):397–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

WZQ designed the study, prepared, edited and reviewed the manuscript. QMH, GY, ZJL, LZ, and WH performed experimental studies. MMB and YZY did literature research, gave comments and reviewed the manuscript. MZY designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Lei Shi and Yupeng Chen (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Science, Tianjin Medical University) for sharing DR-GFP-U2OS and EJ5-U2OS cells.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the publication of this manuscript.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All procedures in this study that involved human participants were performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Furthermore, the care and use of laboratory animals was in accordance with the principles and standards set forth in the Principles for Use of Animals (National Guide for Grants and Contracts).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31700144, 81502660, 81472797 and 81872465), Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Grant Nos. 16JCQNJC10000 and 17JCQNJC10600), and the Foundation of Tianjin Medical University (Grant No. 2015KYZQ09).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, China

    Zhiqiang Wu, Minghan Qiu, Jinlin Zhao, Zhuang Liu, Hui Wang, Maobin Meng & Zhiyong Yuan

  2. Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    Yu Guo

  3. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Science, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China

    Zeyun Mi

Authors
  1. Zhiqiang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minghan Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinlin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhuang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maobin Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhiyong Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zeyun Mi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeyun Mi.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Overexpression of OTUD4 increases radiosensitivity of PC-9 cells. (A) Western blotting and real-time PCR validating overexpression of OTUD4 in PC-9. (B) Representative images of cell clonogenic formation. (C) Statistical quantification of cell clonogenic formation efficiency. α-Tubulin served as loading control. Error bars represent SD from 3 independent experiments. *, p<0.05.

Additional file 2: Fig. S2.

Effects of OTUD4 on cell cycle and apoptosis in NSCLC cells. (A) Representative pictures of cell cycle distribution of indicated cells without IR. (B and C) Representative images (B) and statistical quantification (C) of NSCLC cells without IR. Error bars represent SD from 3 independent experiments. NS, not significant.

Additional file 3: Fig. S3.

OTUD4 inhibits DNA damage repair. (A and B) Representative pictures (A) and quantification (B) of γ-H2AX foci in vector and OTUD4 overexpressed cells treated with IR (6Gy) and allowed recovering for indicated time. (C and D) Diagram (C) and homology repair efficiency (D) determined by FACS of EJ5-U2OS cells transfected with indicated plasmid. (E and F) Western blotting analysis of the expression of OTUD4 and HA-I-SceI in DR-GFP-U2OS (E) and EJ5-U2OS (F) Cells. Error bars represent SD from 3 independent experiments. *, p<0.05.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Qiu, M., Guo, Y. et al. OTU deubiquitinase 4 is silenced and radiosensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells via inhibiting DNA repair. Cancer Cell Int 19, 99 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0816-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0816-z

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us