Skip to main content
Download PDF

YY1 promotes pancreatic cancer cell proliferation by enhancing mitochondrial respiration

Cancer Cell International volume 22, Article number: 287 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

KRAS-driven metabolic reprogramming is a known peculiarity features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells. However, the metabolic roles of other oncogenic genes, such as YY1, in PDAC development are still unclear. In this study, we observed significantly elevated expression of YY1 in human PDAC tissues, which positively correlated with a poor disease progression. Furthermore, in vitro studies confirmed that YY1 deletion inhibited PDAC cell proliferation and tumorigenicity. Moreover, YY1 deletion led to impaired mitochondrial RNA expression, which further inhibited mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complex assembly and altered cellular nucleotide homeostasis. Mechanistically, the impairment of mitochondrial OXPHOS function reduced the generation of aspartate, an output of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), and resulted in the inhibition of cell proliferation owing to unavailability of aspartate-associated nucleotides. Conversely, exogenous supplementation with aspartate fully restored PDAC cell proliferation. Our findings suggest that YY1 promotes PDAC cell proliferation by enhancing mitochondrial respiration and the TCA, which favors aspartate-associated nucleotide synthesis. Thus, targeting nucleotide biosynthesis is a promising strategy for PDAC treatment.

Background

Pancreatic cancer is a type of gastrointestinal malignancy with an extremely poor prognosis [1, 2]. Its mortality rate is expected to surpass those of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers by 2030, making it the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths [3]. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) comprises approximately 90% of pancreatic cancer cases, with the majority of those patients carrying active KRAS mutations [4, 5]. The activation of tumor suppression genes, such as CDKN2A/p16, TP53, and SMAD4, also contributes to PDAC development [6, 7].

Generally, PDAC development involves metabolic remodeling to facilitate cancer cell proliferation. KRAS mutations can upregulate the expression of glycolytic pathway rate-limiting genes, such as phosphofructokinase-1, lactate dehydrogenase A, and hexokinase 2, consequently promoting PDAC tumorigenesis [8, 9]. Additionally, KRAS regulates the expression of hormone-sensitive lipase, to control the storage and utilization of lipid droplets, to fuel the invasive migration of PDAC cells [10]. CD9high, a subtype PDAC tumor-initiating cell, can enhance organoid formation by upregulating the expression of the neutral amino acid transporter B (ASCT2), located in the cell membrane, to enhance glutamine uptake [11]. Furthermore, the rapid development of PDAC is inseparable from nucleotide metabolism. KRAS promotes the expression of ribose-5-phosphate isomerase to accelerate nucleotide biosynthesis [8]. However, the regulation of nucleotide metabolism in PDAC is still unclear and needs elucidation.

Yin-Yang 1 (YY1), composed of 414 amino acids, belongs to GLI-Krüppel zinc finger protein family [12]. As a nuclear transcription factor, it contributes to the regulation of various cellular processes, such as autophagy, cell division, survival, and differentiation [13,14,15]. YY1 has a dual function; it exerts tumor-promoting as well as -suppressive effects, depending on the cancer type. In breast cancer, its overexpression inhibits the growth and tumorigenesis of cancerous cells [16]. Conversely, its overexpression is associated with the proliferation of liver, prostate, gastric, colorectal, and ovarian cancer cells [17,18,19,20]. Therefore, YY1 has different roles in various cancers, and its role in PDAC is still unclear.

Despite its tumor-promoting role, YY1 contributes to the reprogramming of tumor cell metabolism, to aid the cell’s adaption to different microenvironments [21]. Particularly, it activates glucose-6-phospate dehydrogenase (G6PD) transcription, upregulates the activity of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), enhances nucleotide synthesis, and promotes cellular antioxidant defense by supplying nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) to support tumor cell proliferation and tumorigenesis [22, 23]. Further, it regulates mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)-related gene expression in the PGC1 assistant [24]. However, the mechanism by which it regulates OXPHOS gene expression, to support nucleotide synthesis, needs to be clarified.

Therefore, we investigated the role of YY1 in PDAC proliferation. Our results indicated that YY1 is positively associated with PDAC development, while its knockdown (KD) inhibited PDAC cell proliferation. Our results are supported by biochemical and metabolic studies that revealed PDAC cell proliferation is promoted by YY1, which enhances nucleotide availability in a mitochondrial OXPHOS-dependent manner.

Methods

Cell lines and cell culture

The human pancreatic cancer cells PANC1, Pa-Tu-8988, BXPC-3, HEK293T, CFPAC, and MIA-PaCa2 were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China), and the human pancreatic ductal epithelial hTERT-HPNE cell line (HPNE) was obtained from BaiRong Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). All the cell lines, authenticated via a short tandem repeat profiling analysis using Genetic Testing Biotechnology (Suzhou, China), were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 U/ml penicillin (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Beyotime). All the cell lines were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Generation of stable knockdown and transient knockdown cells

A stable KD cell model was generated using second-generation lentiviruses [25]. Lentiviral particles were produced via the co-transfection of the packaging psPAX2, envelope pMD2.G, and KD pLKO.1 vectors (1.25, 0.625 and 0.625 µg, respectively), that used Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cleveland, OH, USA) to carry shRNA sequences into 3 × 105 HEK293T cells that were cultured in a 6-well dish. The YY1 shRNA sequences were as follows: 5′-GACGACGACTACATTGAACAA-3′ and 5′-GCCTCTCCTTTGTATATTATT-3′. We used wild-type pLKO.1 plasmid as a control. We used the limiting dilution method, with puromycin (3 µg/ml), to select YY1-stable KD and control cell lines [26]. The pyruvate carboxylase (PC) transient KD cell line was generated using small interfering RNA (siRNA) provided by Ribobio Company (Guangzhou, China) (siRNA: F 5′-GACGGCGAGGAGATAGTGT-3′, R 5′-TGGCAATCTCACCTCTGTTGG-3′) and transfected control-siRNA (siN0000001-1-1, Ribobio). In brief, the siRNA was transfected into cells using the Lipofectamine™ RNAi MAX Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s protocol (Protocol Pub. No. MAN0007825 Rev.1.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific). A PC and YY1 double KD cell line (YY1 KD siPC) was generated.

Proliferation rates and colony formation

To perform the proliferation assay, 1 × 104 cells were plated in each well of a 12-well dish (Corning). Thereafter, the cells were cultured in nutrient-restricted conditions, with 10% dialyzed FBS (Sigma-Aldrich) supplement, in DMEM (without pyruvate) (Sigma-Aldrich). After 12 h, the cells in each well were counted to determine the initial cell number. Furthermore, the cells with or without aspartate (20 mM) treatment were counted at 24 h intervals for up to 96 h. Thereafter, the proliferation rate was calculated. To perform a colony formation assay, we seeded 1 × 103 cells in each well of a 6-well dish. When visible cell clones appeared, we fixed the cells with methanol for 15 min, after which they were stained with crystal violet (Beyotime) for 10 min. Finally, we used the ImageJ software to count the colonies [27].

ATP measurement

For ATP measurement, 1 × 105 cells were seeded in each well of 6-well dish (Corning) and the ATP level was measured using an ATP Bioluminescent Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). ATP measurement was performed according to the protocol provide by manufacturer. To measure mitochondria-generated ATP, the cells were cultured with pyruvate and 2-DG (5 mM each) for 2 h. Furthermore, to determine the levels of glycolysis-generated ATP, the cells were cultured with 5 mM glucose and 1.25 µg/ml oligomycin, for 2 h.

Oxygen Consumption Rate Assay

The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) assays were performed, as described previously [28], using the Oxygraph-2 k kit (OroborOSX, Innsbruck, Austria). After the cells were added to the chamber, we determined the basal OCR level. To this end, we added 2.5 mM oligomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) to the chamber to determine the uncoupling OCR. Finally, to determine the maximum OCR, we added cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP, 5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich).

Apoptosis analysis

An Apoptosis Detection Kit (Keygen Biotech, Jiangsu, China) was used for apoptosis analysis. We collected 1 × 106 single cells were collected, which were washed twice with cold PBS. The cell pellet was resuspended 500 µl binding buffer. Then, add 5 µl annexin V-EGFP and 5 µl propidium iodide (PI) to the tube and incubate at 23 °C for 15 min in the dark. Finally, cell fluorescence was measured using a NovoCyte flow cytometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Cell cycle analysis

Cell cycle analysis was performed with the Cell Cycle Detection Kit (Keygen Biotech), 1 × 106 single cells were collected, wash once with PBS, and resuspended the cell pellet with 500 µl 70% cold ethanol for 2 h at 4 °C. Thereafter, cells were washed twice with cold PBS before staining, and 500 µl PI/ RNaseA mixture was added to the tube and incubated in the dark for 30 min at 4 °C. In the next step, cells were then filtered for flow cytometry analysis. Finally, DNA content was determined using a NovoCyte flow cytometer and analyzed using the NovoCyte flow cytometer software (NovoExpress 1.5.0).

Immunohistochemical analysis

Pancreatic tissue samples were collected from the Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, including eleven normal pancreatic tissue samples and seventy-one pancreatic cancer tissue samples. Thereafter, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of tissue microarray (TMA) was performed as previously described [26]. Briefly, a targeted area of the tissues was removed from the paraffin-embedded tissue to obtain a TMA sample, which was then arrayed on a slide. This was followed by the deparaffinization and hydration of the samples, wash twice with PBS, then blocked endogenous peroxidase activity with 0.3% H2O2 for 15 min at 23 °C, wash three times with PBS, and then heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed. Afterwards, TMA samples were incubated with anti-YY1 (1:400, Proteintech, Wuhan, China) for 30 min at 23 °C, washed three times with PBS and incubate with fresh diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 5 min, then hematoxylin stain. Optical density (average OD value, AOD) of stained area were quantified using Image-Pro Plus software version 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA) and YY1 expression level was analyzed according to AOD value.

Immunoblotting

For sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) procedure, the cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), and incubated on ice for 15 min, and then centrifuged at 14,000g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were transferred into new tube, protein sample was boiled for 5 min. For blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BNG), samples were lysed with 2.5% digitonin (w/v, Sigma-Aldrich), supplemented 1 mM PMSF (Sangon Biotech) and incubated on ice for 25 min, afterwards, centrifuged at 20,000g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were transferred into new tube. The proteins separated via BNG, or SDS-PAGE were transferred onto 0.22 µm polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Next, the membranes were blocked with 5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h, and then incubated with the primary antibodies: anti-YY1 (66,281–1-Ig; 1:2000; Proteintech), anti-β-actin (sc-47778; 1:5000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-TOM70 (ab251925 1:10,000; Abcam), anti-ATP synthase subunit alpha (ab14748; 1:1000; Abcam), anti-COXI (MS404; 1:1000; Abcam), Abcam), anti-core2 (MS304; 1:1000; Abcam), anti-SDHA (ab14715; 1:1000; Abcam), and anti-GRIM19 (ab110240; 1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), at 4 °C for 24 h. Thereafter, the membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit/mouse IgG (#7074 / #7076; 1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology) secondary antibody for 4 h at 23 °C, and signal detection were performed with a Immun-Star HRP kit (Bio-Rad). Finally, the integrated optical density value (IOD) was quantified by Gel-Pro Analyzer version 4.0 (Media Cybernetics) and YY1 expression level was determined according to IOD.

Metabolite profiling

To perform metabolite profiling experiments, samples were collected following the protocol provided by Metabo-Profile Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Sample preparation were prepared according to a previously published method [29]. Briefly, MIA-PaCa2 and YY1 KD cells (1 × 107 per sample) were collected and washed twice with cold PBS. Thereafter, 1 mL of extraction solution buffer (methanol:acetonitrile:water = 2:2:1 (v/v)) was added to the sample. Then samples were then frozen in liquid nitrogen for 1 min, thawed, and vortexed for 30 s. The above-mentioned procedure was repeated, and thereafter, the samples were sonicated in an ice-water bath for 10 min, incubated at − 40 °C for 1 h, and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Finally, the supernatants were transferred into new glass vials, and sent to Metabo-Profile Biotechnology for metabolite measurements.

Transcriptome profiling

For transcriptome profiling, samples were pre-treated following the protocol provided by the Novogene Corporation (Tianjin, China). In brief, MIA-PaCa2 and YY1 KD cells (5 × 106 per sample) were collected and washed with cold PBS, and total RNA extraction were performed with a RNeasy Mini Extraction Kit (Qiagen Sciences, Germantown, MD, USA), and mRNA were purified using Poly T-attached magnetic beads. To perform reverse transcription using random hexamer primers, the M-MuLV system was used. Library construction as well as sequencing were carried out by Novogene Corporation (Tianjin, China) using a HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). In the control group, one replicate showed a large deviation from the other two; thus, we used the two-versus-two comparison method for further analysis. The metabolism gene list was obtained from a previously published study [30].

Mitochondrial RNA, YY1, and PC transcription analysis

Mitochondrial DNA transcripts were measured via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using a Quantagene q225 system (Kubo Tech, Beijing, China). Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Thereafter, 500 ng of the extracted RNA was analyzed using a reverse transcription kit (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). Further, fluorogenic SYBR Green (Bio-Rad) was used for qPCR; the reaction conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 120 s, 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 30 s, and the amplification primer sequences were as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Amplification primer sequences
Full size table

Analysis of public dataset

The gene expression levels of YY1 in pancreatic cancer were obtained from the website http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn. First select the Boxplot sub-option in Expression DIY, enter the YY1 to be queried, then the name of the cancer to be queried, find the PAAD and add it to the datasets, select the Match TCGA normal and GTEx data option, and the rest are set by default. The results are displayed in the form of plot. The relationship between YY1 expression and patient survival was queried through the same website. Select the survival option, select survival plots, enter the corresponding gene name YY1, select the type of cancer to be queried and select group cutoff. In this study, quartile was used for analysis, and the rest of the settings were based on the default values. Click on plot to generate a graph of the relationship between the expression level of YY1 in patients and prognosis survival.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as the mean ± SEM based on at least three independent replicate experiments. Significant differences were evaluated by performing independent Student's t-test or paired Student's t-test using SPSS software v21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The data were plotted using Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Significance level: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Results

YY1 is elevated in PDAC and is positively correlated with a poor prognosis in patients with PDAC

Upon comparing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases, the expression level of YY1 was found to be significantly higher in cancerous than in healthy pancreatic tissues (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, survival analysis indicated that a high YY1 expression was associated with a poor PDAC prognosis (Fig. 1B). Additionally, IHC analysis also revealed a significant increase in YY1 expression in the cancerous pancreatic ductal area (Fig. 1C, D). Quantification of YY1 mRNA and protein expression levels in PDAC and HPNE cells revealed that YY1 was significantly upregulated in PDAC cells (Fig. 1E–G). Although PANC1 and HPNE showed no significant difference with respect to YY1 expression at the mRNA level (Fig. 1E), western blotting showed that YY1 expression was significantly elevated in PANC1 cells (Fig. 1G).

Fig. 1
figure 1

YY1 is elevated in PDAC and is positively correlated with a poor prognosis in patients with PDAC. A, B YY1 expression and survival plots in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) provided by the GEPIA server (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn). For the expression plot (A), the threshold was set as follows: log2-fold change < 1, P < 0.01, and for the survival plot (B), the high and low expression groups were split by inter-quartile ranges, and the hazards ratio (HR) was calculated based on the Cox PH model. C Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of TMA. TMAs were incubated with anti-YY1 antibodies and stained with DAB and hematoxylin. YY1 expression in adjacent normal (n = 11) and malignant pancreatic ducts (n = 71) is shown at different magnifications (50 × , scale bar = 200 μm; 200 × , scale bar = 50 μm). D Quantitative analysis of YY1 expression in TMAs. Quantification of YY1 expression represented as average optical density (AOD). E Relative YY1 mRNA levels in PDAC and HPNE cell lines. F YY1 protein levels in PDAC and HPNE cell lines. G Statistical analysis of YY1 western blotting results (n = 3)

Full size image

Knockdown of YY1 inhibits PDAC cell proliferation

To determine the role of YY1 in PDAC, an in vitro YY1 KD cell model was established in MIA-PaCa2 and PANC1 cell lines. The YY1 KD ratios were determined at both mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2A–D). Loss-of-function experiments were used to explore the effects of YY1 KD on PDAC cell proliferation and colony formation capacity. Compared with those of the control cells, the proliferation rate (Fig. 2E, F) and clone formation ability (Fig. 2G, H) of YY1 KD cells were significantly reduced. To confirm that this reduction was not due to YY1 KD-induced apoptosis, we performed apoptosis assays and flow cytometry using the classical ANNEXIN-V and PI double staining method. The apoptosis index was determined by calculating the ratio of the ANNEXIN-V+ population (Lower Right: viable apoptotic cell) and the ANNEXIN-V +/PI+ population (Upper Right: non-viable apoptotic cell) in the entire sample. Cell apoptosis analysis demonstrated that cell proliferation arrest, induced by YY1 KD, was not a result of apoptosis (Fig. 2I, J).

Fig. 2
figure 2

YY1 knockdown inhibits PDAC cells proliferation. A Relative YY1 mRNA levels in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells (n = 3 per group) (Western blot analysis of YY1 expression in MIA-PaCa2 and YY1 KD cells; statistical analysis was based on YY1 levels corresponding to the MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells (n = 3 per group). C Relative YY1 mRNA transcription levels in PANC1 control and YY1 KD cells (n = 3 per group). D YY1 levels in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells detected via western blotting; statistical analysis was based on YY1 levels corresponding to the MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells (n = 3 per group). E Proliferation rate of the MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells; data were normalized to cell number at t = 0. F Proliferation rate of PANC1 control and YY1 KD cells determined as in E. G (left) Colony formation in crystal violet-stained MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells after 10 days of cell culturing, (right) Colony number counted using the ImageJ software. H Colony formation in PANC1 control and YY1 KD cells determined as in G. I Apoptosis of MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells measured via flow cytometry (n = 3 per group). The bar graph located to the lower right depicts the statistical analysis of cell apoptosis. J Cell apoptosis of PANC1 control and YY1 KD cells determined as in I

Full size image

Knockdown of YY1 impairs cellular nucleotide homeostasis

Cell proliferation requires a large number of substrates and an adequate energy supply. Metabolite profiling of MIA-PaCa2 YY1 KD and control cells showed that upon removal of YY1, 24 metabolites were significantly up-regulated and 15 were significantly down-regulated upon removal of YY1 (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, Metabolite Sets Enrichment analysis showed that the metabolites involved in citrate cycle, pyrimidine metabolism, and purine metabolism were significantly enriched in YY1 KD cells compared to those in control cells (Fig. 3B). A metabolite pathway impact analysis also indicated that fatty acid biosynthesis, citrate cycle, pyrimidine metabolism, purine metabolism were enriched in YY1 KD cells (Fig. 3C). Cell cycle analysis revealed that the proportion of cells in the S phase was significantly increased in YY1 KD cells (Fig. 3D, E). These results indicate that YY1 KD impairs nucleotide metabolism, the probable major cause of cell proliferation arrest [31, 32].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Knockdown of YY1 impairs cellular nucleotide homeostasis. A Metabolite profiling results corresponding to MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells. The red and blue points represent up- and down-regulated YY1 KD cell metabolites, respectively (P < 0.05, n = 6 per group). B Metabolite Sets Enrichment analysis of whole metabolites. C Pathway impact analysis of whole metabolites, pathways with P < 0.05 were marked in the figure. D DNA content in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells (n = 3 per group). E Statistical analysis of the cell cycle

Full size image

YY1 knockdown downregulates mitochondrial genome-encoded OXPHOS gene expression

YY1 KD impairs nucleotide metabolism; however, the causative mechanism is still unclear. Furthermore, YY1 is a nuclear transcription factor that regulates the transcription of numerous genes. A total of 3866 significantly differentially expressed genes were detected in MIA-PaCa2 YY1 KD and control cells, with 1839 and 2027 genes upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in YY1 KD cells (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, KEGG pathway cluster analysis of the downregulated genes in YY1 KD cells revealed that the top 20 metabolism-related pathways included the oxidative phosphorylation pathway, purine metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, and the citrate cycle (TCA) (Fig. 4B). KEGG pathway analysis also revealed that YY1 KD primarily affected the TCA cycle, OXPHOS, and purine metabolism pathway-related gene transcription. Specifically, TCA-related gene expression was generally reduced in YY1 KD cells (Fig. 4C), while nuclear genome encoding OXPHOS genes did not show apparent variations between the YY1 KD and control cells; however, mitochondrial genome-encoded OXPHOS genes showed reduced expression in YY1 KD cells (Fig. 4D, E). This difference was confirmed via RT-qPCR analysis of MIA-PaCa2 and PANC1 YY1 KD cell lines (Fig. 4F, G).

Fig. 4
figure 4

YY1 knockdown downregulates mitochondrial genome-encoded OXPHOS gene expression. A Differentially expressed genes in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells. The threshold was set as: P-adj < 0.05, |log2(Ctrl/YY1 KD) |> 0. B KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of metabolic genes in YY1 KD downregulated genes. The Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed based on the KEGG database (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/). The threshold was set as: log2(Ctrl/YY1 KD) > 0. Heatmap representation of tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) gene expression (C), nuclear encoded OXPHOS genes expression (D), and mitochondrial genome encoded OXPHOS gene expression E in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells as determined via RNA-seq. The data are from two independent experiments and the values are normalized via the Z-Score and color-coded as indicated (n = 2 per group). Relative mitochondrial-encoded OXPHOS protein expression in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells (F) and PANC1 control and YY1 KD cells (G), as determined by RT-qPCR. β-actin was the internal control (n = 3 per group)

Full size image

YY1 Knockdown impairs mitochondrial function

YY1 KD mainly affected the expression of genes related to TCA and OXPHOS, which are closely associated with mitochondrial function. The downregulated expression of mitochondrial OXPHOS-related genes could alter OXPHOS complexes formation. BNG results showed that YY1 KD downregulated the mitochondrial OXPHOS complex (Fig. 5A, B). Furthermore, OCR analysis demonstrated that YY1 KD cells had significantly reduced basal and maximum OCRs (Fig. 5C). Our results also indicated that whole cell ATP production capacity, which depends on OXPHOS, was significantly reduced in YY1 KD cells (Fig. 5D, E), while glycolysis-dependent ATP production was unaffected (Fig. 5F).

Fig. 5
figure 5

YY1 knockdown impairs mitochondrial function in pancreatic cancer cells. A Respiratory chain single complex expression levels were determined in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells via BNG (CI: anti-GRIM19, CII: anti-SDHA, CIII: anti-core2, CIV: anti-COX I, CV: anti-ATP synthase subunit alpha (ATP5F1A), anti-TOM70 as loading control, n = 3 per group). B Quantification of single complex expression, based on density (n = 3 per group). C Oxygen consumption rate of the MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells. Relative ATP levels in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells (n = 3 per group). Whole cell ATP level (D), cells were incubated with 5 mM 2-DG and 5 mM pyruvate for the measurement of mitochondria-generated ATP (E) and cells incubated with 5 mM glucose and 1.25 µg/mL oligomycin for the measurement of glycolysis-generated ATP (F) (n = 3 per group)

Full size image

Aspartate restores cell proliferation in YY1KD cells due to impaired mitochondrial respiration

Given that YY1 KD induced cell cycle arrest and impaired mitochondrial function, the relationship between nucleotide metabolism and mitochondrial function was investigated. Our results in this regard indicated that nucleotide biosynthesis depends on multiple metabolic pathways, such as glycolysis, PPP, the TCA cycle, and one-carbon metabolism. Metabolomics results also showed no significant difference between YY1 KD and control cells with respect to the glycolysis pathway, PPP, and one-carbon cycle (Fig. 6A–C); however, TCA-related metabolites were significantly reduced in YY1 KD cells (Fig. 6D). Further, the levels of glutamate and aspartate were drastically decreased in YY1 KD cells. Aspartate provides a carbon backbone for de novo pyrimidines. To determine whether mitochondrial function deficiency inhibited aspartate biosynthesis-induced proliferation, we treated YY1 KD and control cells with the OXPHOS inhibitor, rotenone (CI), which eliminates the proliferation advantage of control the cells. The addition of supra-physiological concentrations of aspartate into the culture medium restored the proliferation arrest caused by OXPHOS inhibitors (Fig. 6E). Thus, it appeared that the reason for YY1 KD inhibiting cell proliferation was the inability to produce sufficient aspartate for nucleotide synthesis. After aspartate over-supplementation in the culture medium, YY1 KD cell proliferation returned to normal; however, it was still lower than that corresponding to the control cells with aspartate (Fig. 6F). Additionally, aspartate supplementation reversed YY1 KD-induced cell proliferation arrest in the PANC1 cell line (Fig. 6G). Reportedly, in mammalian cells, de novo aspartate synthesis occurs in the mitochondria, where glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 2 (GOT2) catalyzes the transamination of glutamate to oxaloacetate (OAA), from aspartate and alpha-ketoglutarate [33, 34]. In the culture medium, glutamine is typically over-supplemented, while OAA, a non-essential nutrient, can be produced through a TCA cycle-dependent and -independent pathway, in which PC can convert pyruvate to OAA [35]. MIA-PaCa2 YY1 and PC double-KD cells were unable to proliferate, but their proliferation could be restored with the addition of aspartate (Fig. 6H). These results suggested that the proliferation rate difference in between YY1 KD and control cells was caused by TCA-dependent aspartate synthesis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Aspartate restores cell proliferation in YY1 KD cells due to impaired mitochondrial respiration. A-D Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) quantification of different metabolic pathway metabolites in MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells. A Glycolysis, B pentose phosphate pathway, C one carbon, and D TCA (n = 3 per group). E Proliferation rates of MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells treated with mitochondrial OXPHOS inhibiter, rotenone (25 nM), with or without aspartate (20 mM). Cell number was normalized with t = 0 (n = 3 per group). F Proliferation rates of MIA-PaCa2 control and YY1 KD cells were calculated with or without aspartate (20 mM). Cell number was normalized with t = 0 (n = 3 per group). G Proliferation rates of PANC1 control and YY1 KD cells determined as in F (n = 3 per group). H Proliferation rates of MIA-PaCa2 PC KD cells determined in the presence or absence of aspartate (20 mM). Cell number was normalized with t = 0 (n = 3 per group)

Full size image

Discussion

Pancreatic cancer is a disease that involves multiple gene pathways, and approximately 90% of pancreatic cancers contain KRASG12D. Additionally, the inactivation of P53 further accelerates pancreatic cancer development [36]. To adapt to the hypo-vascular nature of pancreatic cancer, which is usually characterized by oxygen and nutrient deficiency, oncogenic KRAS promotes glucose transporter (GLUT1) and hexokinase gene transcription to enhance glucose transport and utilization [8]. Moreover, pancreatic cancer cells can obtain nutrients through various means, be it KRAS- or P53-dependent or -independent [37,38,39,40,41]. In this study, we observed an increase in YY1 expression in PDAC cell lines, and associated with a poor prognosis. Previous reports revealed that YY1 can downregulate pancreatic cancer development through the YY1-CDKN3-MDM2/P53-P21 axis [42]. However, contrary to previous research, CDKN3 showed no significant difference in the MIA-PaCa2 YY1 KD cell line (data not shown), possibly caused by the genomic variance in PDAC cells [43]. Studies have shown that KRAS can activate YY1 transcription through the NF-κB signaling pathway. The activated YY1 downregulates the expression of the tumor suppressor gene miR-489, thereby promoting the migration and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells [20]. In addition, we explored the function of YY1 in pancreatic cancer using a series of loss-of-function assays. The results indicated that YY1 KD inhibited cell proliferation, which could be reversed by aspartate supplementation. Further investigations demonstrated that YY1 KD reduced mitochondrial OXPHOS gene transcription, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction.

The function of mitochondria can be summarized as follows: it (1) provides ATP for various cell activities, such as cell proliferation, protein transport, and migration; (2) produces substrates for the biosynthesis of macromolecules, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleotides and [23, 31]; (3) regulates cell apoptosis and signaling [44,45,46]. Normal cells transport pyruvate into the mitochondria for ATP production, while cancer cells, independent of the mitochondria, convert it into lactic acid for complete oxidation, even with sufficient oxygen (Warburg effect) [47]. Mitochondrial OXPHOS is primarily an ATP-producing, catabolic process in cells [48, 49]. However, glycolysis can also produce sufficient ATP to support cell survival [50]; in cancer cells, OXPHOS is usually defective [51, 52]. However, mitochondria still play a very important role in cancer cell proliferation [31, 53]. NADH, produced by glycolysis, is transported from the cytoplasm to the mitochondria to regenerate NAD+, which relies on the malate-aspartate shuttle [54]. Furthermore, the transport of aspartate from mitochondria to the cytoplasm relies on the malate-aspartate shuttle. The concentration of aspartate, which is mainly synthesized in the mitochondria via transamination catalyzed by GOT2, in human blood is extremely low (0–15 µM) [55]. Besides its role as an important component of proteins, aspartate provides a carbon backbone for nucleotide synthesis [56]. In this study, cell cycle analysis of YY1 KD cells demonstrated that they arrested in the S phase, indicating that they were unable to synthesize sufficient nucleotides for cell proliferation. Additionally, the observed metabolic profiles indicated that the metabolic pathways involved in nucleotide synthesis, such as the glycolysis pathway, PPP, and one-carbon cycle pathway, were unaffected in YY1 KD cells. After adding OXPHOS inhibitor to the culture medium of YY1 KD and control cells, the proliferation advantage of the control cells disappeared, while proliferation arrest was reversed by aspartate. Thus, we inferred that the YY1 KD cell cycle arrest was due to impaired aspartate biosynthesis.

When supra-physiological levels of aspartate were added to the YY1 KD cell culture medium, the proliferation of YY1 KD cells became normal, confirming that the difference in proliferation ability between YY1 KD and control cells was caused by differences in intracellular aspartate concentration. Given that aspartate is formed from OAA, the OAA content of the mitochondria determines its biosynthesis [57]. When OAA is converted to aspartate, the TCA cycle slows down due to a lack of intermediates, which can be replenished using glutamate and pyruvate. The glutamate content in YY1 KD cells was lower than that in control cells, and this possibly impeded aspartate synthesis in YY1 KD cells via the TCA cycle. Another pathway by which OAA is replenished is the conversion of pyruvate to OAA by PC, which is independent of the TCA pathway [58, 59]. After PC knock down in YY1 KD cells and control cells, the YY1 KD cells could not proliferate; thus, cell death was observed. However, the control cells still showed the ability to proliferate. After adding aspartate to the PC KD cell culture medium, the difference between the YY1 KD and control cells in terms of proliferation disappeared. This result can be explained by the fact that TCA-dependent aspartate synthesis was primarily responsible for the inhibition of YY1 KD cell proliferation.

Conclusions

YY1 promotes PDAC cell proliferation by enhancing nucleotide availability in a mitochondrial OXPHOS-dependent manner. These findings provide novel therapeutic targets for pancreatic cancer.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials are available within the article or from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Lennon AM, Wolfgang CL, Canto MI, Klein AP, Herman JM, Goggins M, Fishman EK, Kamel I, Weiss MJ, Diaz LA, et al. The early detection of pancreatic cancer: what will it take to diagnose and treat curable pancreatic neoplasia? Cancer Res. 2014;74(13):3381–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Halbrook CJ, Lyssiotis CA. Employing metabolism to improve the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(1):5–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74(11):2913–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarantis P, Koustas E, Papadimitropoulou A, Papavassiliou AG, Karamouzis MV. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: treatment hurdles, tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;12(2):173–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunne RF, Hezel AF. Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015;29(4):595–608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brody JR, Costantino CL, Potoczek M, Cozzitorto J, McCue P, Yeo CJ, Hruban RH, Witkiewicz AK. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas harbors KRAS2, DPC4 and TP53 molecular alterations similar to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(5):651–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ying H, Kimmelman AC, Lyssiotis CA, Hua S, Chu GC, Fletcher-Sananikone E, Locasale JW, Son J, Zhang H, Coloff JL, et al. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell. 2012;149(3):656–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanner LB, Goglia AG, Wei MH, Sehgal T, Parsons LR, Park JO, White E, Toettcher JE, Rabinowitz JD. Four key steps control glycolytic flux in mammalian cells. Cell Syst. 2018;7(1):49–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rozeveld CN, Johnson KM, Zhang L, Razidlo GL. KRAS controls pancreatic cancer cell lipid metabolism and invasive potential through the lipase HSL. Cancer Res. 2020;80(22):4932–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang VM, Ferreira RMM, Almagro J, Evan T, Legrave N, Zaw Thin M, Frith D, Carvalho J, Barry DJ, Snijders AP, et al. CD9 identifies pancreatic cancer stem cells and modulates glutamine metabolism to fuel tumour growth. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(11):1425–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Park K, Atchison ML. Isolation of a candidate repressor/activator, NF-E1 (YY-1, delta), that binds to the immunoglobulin kappa 3’ enhancer and the immunoglobulin heavy-chain mu E1 site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(21):9804–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu S, Kasim V, Kano MR, Tanaka S, Ohba S, Miura Y, Miyata K, Liu X, Matsuhashi A, Chung UI, et al. Transcription factor YY1 contributes to tumor growth by stabilizing hypoxia factor HIF-1alpha in a p53-independent manner. Cancer Res. 2013;73(6):1787–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen F, Sun H, Zhao Y, Wang H. YY1 in cell differentiation and tissue development. Crit Rev Oncog. 2017;22(1–2):131–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krippner-Heidenreich A, Walsemann G, Beyrouthy MJ, Speckgens S, Kraft R, Thole H, Talanian RV, Hurt MM, Luscher B. Caspase-dependent regulation and subcellular redistribution of the transcriptional modulator YY1 during apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(9):3704–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee MH, Lahusen T, Wang RH, Xiao C, Xu X, Hwang YS, He WW, Shi Y, Deng CX. Yin Yang 1 positively regulates BRCA1 and inhibits mammary cancer formation. Oncogene. 2012;31(1):116–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Han J, Meng J, Chen S, Wang X, Yin S, Zhang Q, Liu H, Qin R, Li Z, Zhong W, et al. YY1 Complex promotes quaking expression via super-enhancer binding during EMT of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2019;79(7):1451–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang W, Zhou W, Xiang L, Wu X, Zhang P, Wang J, Liu G, Zhang W, Peng Y, Huang X, et al. The p300/YY1/miR-500a-5p/HDAC2 signalling axis regulates cell proliferation in human colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Wu X, Dai W, Li J, Xiang L, Tang W, Lin J, Zhang W, Liu G, Yang Q, et al. The CCDC43-ADRM1 axis regulated by YY1, promotes proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020;482:90–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan P, He XH, Rong YF, Cao J, Li Y, Hu YP, Liu Y, Li D, Lou W, Liu MF. KRAS/NF-kappaB/YY1/miR-489 Signaling axis controls pancreatic cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2017;77(1):100–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y, Wu S, Huang C, Li Y, Zhao H, Kasim V. Yin Yang 1 promotes the Warburg effect and tumorigenesis via glucose transporter GLUT3. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(8):2423–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu S, Wang H, Li Y, Xie Y, Huang C, Zhao H, Miyagishi M, Kasim V. Transcription factor YY1 promotes cell proliferation by directly activating the pentose phosphate pathway. Cancer Res. 2018;78(16):4549–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lane AN, Fan TW. Regulation of mammalian nucleotide metabolism and biosynthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(4):2466–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cunningham JT, Rodgers JT, Arlow DH, Vazquez F, Mootha VK, Puigserver P. mTOR controls mitochondrial oxidative function through a YY1-PGC-1alpha transcriptional complex. Nature. 2007;450(7170):736–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Campeau E, Ruhl VE, Rodier F, Smith CL, Rahmberg BL, Fuss JO, Campisi J, Yaswen P, Cooper PK, Kaufman PD. A versatile viral system for expression and depletion of proteins in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(8): e6529.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ye X, Wei X, Liao J, Chen P, Li X, Chen Y, Yang Y, Zhao Q, Sun H, Pan L, et al. 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-like protein promotes pancreatic cancer cell progression and is associated with glutamine-mediated redox balance. Front Oncol. 2020;10: 617190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gnaiger E. Mitochondrial Pathways and Respiratory Control. Mitochondr Physiol Network 19.12. Innsbruck. OROBOROS MiPNet Publications; 2014.

  29. Yuan Y, Xu P, Jiang Q, Cai X, Wang T, Peng W, Sun J, Zhu C, Zhang C, Yue D, et al. Exercise-induced alpha-ketoglutaric acid stimulates muscle hypertrophy and fat loss through OXGR1-dependent adrenal activation. EMBO J. 2020;39(7): e103304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Birsoy K, Wang T, Chen WW, Freinkman E, Abu-Remaileh M, Sabatini DM. An essential role of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in cell proliferation is to enable aspartate synthesis. Cell. 2015;162(3):540–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sullivan LB, Gui DY, Hosios AM, Bush LN, Freinkman E, Vander Heiden MG. Supporting aspartate biosynthesis is an essential function of respiration in proliferating cells. Cell. 2015;162(3):552–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lunt SY, Muralidhar V, Hosios AM, Israelsen WJ, Gui DY, Newhouse L, Ogrodzinski M, Hecht V, Xu K, Acevedo PN, et al. Pyruvate kinase isoform expression alters nucleotide synthesis to impact cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 2015;57(1):95–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang H, Zhou L, Shi Q, Zhao Y, Lin H, Zhang M, Zhao S, Yang Y, Ling ZQ, Guan KL, et al. SIRT3-dependent GOT2 acetylation status affects the malate-aspartate NADH shuttle activity and pancreatic tumor growth. EMBO J. 2015;34(8):1110–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hong R, Zhang W, Xia X, Zhang K, Wang Y, Wu M, Fan J, Li J, Xia W, Xu F, et al. Preventing BRCA1/ZBRK1 repressor complex binding to the GOT2 promoter results in accelerated aspartate biosynthesis and promotion of cell proliferation. Mol Oncol. 2019;13(4):959–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Cheng T, Sudderth J, Yang C, Mullen AR, Jin ES, Mates JM, DeBerardinis RJ. Pyruvate carboxylase is required for glutamine-independent growth of tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(21):8674–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim H, Saka B, Knight S, Borges M, Childs E, Klein A, Wolfgang C, Herman J, Adsay VN, Hruban RH, et al. Having pancreatic cancer with tumoral loss of ATM and normal TP53 protein expression is associated with a poorer prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(7):1865–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sousa CM, Biancur DE, Wang X, Halbrook CJ, Sherman MH, Zhang L, Kremer D, Hwang RF, Witkiewicz AK, Ying H, et al. Pancreatic stellate cells support tumour metabolism through autophagic alanine secretion. Nature. 2016;536(7617):479–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Banh RS, Biancur DE, Yamamoto K, Sohn ASW, Walters B, Kuljanin M, Gikandi A, Wang H, Mancias JD, Schneider RJ, et al. Neurons Release Serine to Support mRNA Translation in Pancreatic Cancer. Cell. 2020;183(5):1202–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Olivares O, Mayers JR, Gouirand V, Torrence ME, Gicquel T, Borge L, Lac S, Roques J, Lavaut MN, Berthezene P, et al. Collagen-derived proline promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell survival under nutrient limited conditions. Nat Commun. 2017;8:16031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao W, Rose JL, Wang W, Seth S, Jiang H, Taguchi A, Liu J, Yan L, Kapoor A, Hou P, et al. Syndecan 1 is a critical mediator of macropinocytosis in pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2019;568(7752):410–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Commisso C, Davidson SM, Soydaner-Azeloglu RG, Parker SJ, Kamphorst JJ, Hackett S, Grabocka E, Nofal M, Drebin JA, Thompson CB, et al. Macropinocytosis of protein is an amino acid supply route in Ras-transformed cells. Nature. 2013;497(7451):633–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu D, Zhang J, Wu Y, Shi G, Yuan H, Lu Z, Zhu Q, Wu P, Lu C, Guo F, et al. YY1 suppresses proliferation and migration of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by regulating the CDKN3/MdM2/P53/P21 signaling pathway. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(7):1392–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Deer EL, Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Coursen JD, Shea JE, Ngatia J, Scaife CL, Firpo MA, Mulvihill SJ. Phenotype and genotype of pancreatic cancer cell lines. Pancreas. 2010;39(4):425–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Corrado M, Mariotti FR, Trapani L, Taraborrelli L, Nazio F, Cianfanelli V, Soriano ME, Schrepfer E, Cecconi F, Scorrano L, et al. Macroautophagy inhibition maintains fragmented mitochondria to foster T cell receptor-dependent apoptosis. EMBO J. 2016;35(16):1793–809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wellen KE, Hatzivassiliou G, Sachdeva UM, Bui TV, Cross JR, Thompson CB. ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation. Science. 2009;324(5930):1076–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, Agarwal S, Iyer LM, Liu DR, Aravind L, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324(5929):930–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123(3191):309–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Snoeck HW. Mitochondrial regulation of hematopoietic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017;49:91–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hsu YC, Wu YT, Yu TH, Wei YH. Mitochondria in mesenchymal stem cell biology and cell therapy: From cellular differentiation to mitochondrial transfer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;52:119–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gottlieb E, Tomlinson IP. Mitochondrial tumour suppressors: a genetic and biochemical update. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(11):857–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chandra D, Singh KK. Genetic insights into OXPHOS defect and its role in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1807(6):620–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Owens KM, Kulawiec M, Desouki MM, Vanniarajan A, Singh KK. Impaired OXPHOS complex III in breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8): e23846.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang L, Garcia Canaveras JC, Chen Z, Wang L, Liang L, Jang C, Mayr JA, Zhang Z, Ghergurovich JM, Zhan L, et al. Serine catabolism Feeds NADH when Respiration Is Impaired. Cell Metab. 2020;31(4):809–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Abbrescia DI, La Piana G, Lofrumento NE. Malate-aspartate shuttle and exogenous NADH/cytochrome c electron transport pathway as two independent cytosolic reducing equivalent transfer systems. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;518(2):157–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mayers JR, Vander Heiden MG. Famine versus feast: understanding the metabolism of tumors in vivo. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40(3):130–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Garcia-Bermudez J, Baudrier L, La K, Zhu XG, Fidelin J, Sviderskiy VO, Papagiannakopoulos T, Molina H, Snuderl M, Lewis CA, et al. Aspartate is a limiting metabolite for cancer cell proliferation under hypoxia and in tumours. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(7):775–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. DeLorenzo RJ, Ruddle FH. Glutamate oxalate transaminase (GOT) genetics in Mus musculus: linkage, polymorphism, and phenotypes of the Got-2 and Got-1 loci. Biochem Genet. 1970;4(2):259–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cardaci S, Zheng L, MacKay G, van den Broek NJ, MacKenzie ED, Nixon C, Stevenson D, Tumanov S, Bulusu V, Kamphorst JJ, et al. Pyruvate carboxylation enables growth of SDH-deficient cells by supporting aspartate biosynthesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(10):1317–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Fu A, Danial NN. Grasping for aspartate in tumour metabolism. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(7):738–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Junyi Wang at our laboratory for the generation of YY1 KD and PC KD cells. We also thank Dr. Hezhi Fang for technical support in performing BN-PAGE blotting.

Funding

This research was funded by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant Number LGF18C050002 and Zhejiang Basic Public Welfare Research Project, Grant Number LY20H200002.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bin Li, Junyi Wang and Jing Liao contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China

    Bin Li, Minghui Wu & Minghua Jiang

  2. Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Ministry of Education; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics; College of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China

    Jing Liao, Xiangshu Yuan & Hezhi Fang

  3. School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China

    Lijun Shen

  4. Department of Clinical Laboratory Examination, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China

    Junyi Wang

Authors
  1. Bin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junyi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Minghui Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiangshu Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hezhi Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lijun Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Minghua Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, BL, JW, JL, HF, LS and MJ; methodology, BL, JW, MW, XY; software, BL, JW; validation, BL, LS and MJ; formal analysis, BL, JW and MJ; investigation, BL, JW, JL and MJ; resources, MJ; data curation, BL, JW, JL, MW, XY, LS and MJ; writing—original draft preparation, BL, HF, JW; writing—review and editing, BL, LS, and MJ; visualization, BL, JW, JL, LS and MJ; supervision, BL, HF, LS and MJ; project administration, BL, JW, JL, HF, LS and MJ; funding acquisition, MJ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lijun Shen or Minghua Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Ethics Committee of Wenzhou Medical University (Grant Number: 2019-084).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B., Wang, J., Liao, J. et al. YY1 promotes pancreatic cancer cell proliferation by enhancing mitochondrial respiration. Cancer Cell Int 22, 287 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02712-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02712-w

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us