Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Primary research
  • Open Access

CIB1 depletion with docetaxel or TRAIL enhances triple-negative breast cancer cell death

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 2, 3Email author
Cancer Cell International201919:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0740-2

©  The Author(s) 2019

  • Received: 20 September 2018
  • Accepted: 29 January 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Patients diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have limited treatment options and often suffer from resistance and toxicity due to chemotherapy. We previously found that depleting calcium and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) induces cell death selectively in TNBC cells, while sparing normal cells. Therefore, we asked whether CIB1 depletion further enhances tumor-specific killing when combined with either the commonly used chemotherapeutic, docetaxel, or the cell death-inducing ligand, TRAIL.

Methods

We targeted CIB1 by RNA interference in MDA-MB-436, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, docetaxel-resistant MDA-MB-436 TNBC cells and ME16C normal breast epithelial cells alone or combination with docetaxel or TRAIL. Cell death was quantified via trypan blue exclusion using flow cytometry and cell death mechanisms were analyzed by Western blotting. Cell surface levels of TRAIL receptors were measured by flow cytometry analysis.

Results

CIB1 depletion combined with docetaxel significantly enhanced tumor-specific cell death relative to each treatment alone. The enhanced cell death strongly correlated with caspase-8 activation, a hallmark of death receptor-mediated apoptosis. The death receptor TRAIL-R2 was upregulated in response to CIB1 depletion, which sensitized TNBC cells to the ligand TRAIL, resulting in a synergistic increase in cell death. In addition to death receptor-mediated apoptosis, both combination treatments activated a non-apoptotic mechanism, called paraptosis. Interestingly, these combination treatments also induced nearly complete death of docetaxel-resistant MDA-MB-436 cells, again via apoptosis and paraptosis. In contrast, neither combination treatment induced cell death in normal ME16C cells.

Conclusion

Novel combinations of CIB1 depletion with docetaxel or TRAIL selectively enhance naive and docetaxel-resistant TNBC cell death while sparing normal cell. Therefore, combination therapies that target CIB1 could prove to be a safe and durable strategy for treatment of TNBC and potentially other cancers.

Keywords

  • CIB1
  • TRAIL
  • Apoptosis
  • Triple-negative breast cancer
  • Chemoresistance

Background

Approximately 15–20% of all breast cancer deaths in the U.S. occur in patients diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype defined by a lack of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Ref. [1]). Due to lack of these targetable cell surface receptors, radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy remain the current standard of care [1, 2]. While a subset of TNBC patients respond initially to chemotherapy, they often suffer from toxicity and acquired resistance, resulting in cancer recurrence and metastasis [2–4]. Therefore, there is a critical need for efficacious therapies that limit toxicity and overcome resistance for TNBC patients.

Recent efforts to improve clinical efficacy of chemotherapies have shifted towards combining them with targeted approaches to lower effective chemotherapeutic doses while maintaining therapeutic response [1, 2]. For instance, in clinical trials that targeted the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is commonly upregulated/activated in TNBC, there was no improvement in chemotherapeutic efficacy [5–7]. Moreover, while ongoing clinical trials are testing PI3K–AKT and MEK–ERK signaling pathways downstream of EGFR, toxicity remains unresolved with a modest to no increase in patient survival (NCT02423603, NCT01964924).

Our lab previously found that calcium and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1), an intracellular protein that regulates highly oncogenic PI3K–AKT and MEK–ERK signaling, may represent a viable target in TNBC [8, 9]. We showed that CIB1 depletion simultaneously inhibits AKT and ERK activation and induces significant cell death in approximately 70% of TNBC cell lines tested and in an in vivo xenograft model [8]. Common to TNBC cell lines that are sensitive to CIB1 depletion is elevated AKT activation. Thus, CIB1 depletion does not cause cell death in TNBC and normal cell lines that exhibit low basal AKT activity [8]. Here, we evaluated cell death in TNBC versus normal breast epithelial cell lines using novel combination treatments involving CIB1 depletion with and without the commonly used chemotherapeutic docetaxel. We found that CIB1 depletion enhanced docetaxel-induced cell death selectively in TNBC over normal cells largely via a death receptor-mediated, as opposed to mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis.

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a death receptor ligand, was once thought to be a promising anti-cancer agent because of its selectivity for killing tumor but not normal cells; however, it was not pursued due to innate or acquired resistance driven by dysfunctional TRAIL receptors [10, 11]. Interestingly, there is a growing interest in combining chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted approaches with TRAIL to overcome this resistance [12–14]. Here we find that CIB1 depletion in combination with the death receptor ligand TRAIL potentiates TNBC-selective cell death, likely due to the upregulation of TRAIL receptor-2 (TRAIL-R2/DR5) in CIB1-depleted TNBC cells. Thus, TRAIL in combination with CIB1 depletion may represent a novel mechanism to sensitize TRAIL-resistant TNBC cells.

Chemotherapy not only causes toxicity, but also often leads to cancer recurrence [3]. Since recurrence driven by drug resistance is often associated with dysfunctional apoptotic mechanisms [15], one approach to circumvent resistance is to induce non-apoptotic cell death [4, 16]. Here, we identified paraptosis as a likely non-apoptotic mode of cell death induced by CIB1 depletion, due to the observed cellular swelling and intracellular vacuolization that are morphological hallmarks of paraptosis [17, 18]. Currently, there are no well-defined molecular mechanisms known to regulate paraptosis. However, the intracellular protein ALG-2-interacting protein X (Alix) has been shown to inhibit paraptosis by preventing cytoplasmic vacuolization, potentially by regulating endosomal sorting and fusion with other organelles [17, 19]. Separate studies showed that known inducers of paraptosis such as withaferin A and reactive oxygen species decrease the expression of Alix in breast cancer cells [18, 20]. Therefore, loss of Alix expression is considered a molecular marker of paraptosis [17, 18, 20, 21]. In addition to downregulation of Alix, insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-1R) tyrosine kinase and JNK activity were found to induce paraptosis [17]. Here we report that CIB1 depletion alone or in combination with docetaxel/TRAIL not only restores apoptotic signaling but also induces paraptosis in docetaxel-resistant TNBC cells. Combination therapies involving CIB1 targeting could therefore provide safe and durable strategies for treatment of TNBC and potentially other cancers.

Materials and methods

Cell lines

The human triple-negative breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-436 [Perou Lab, UNC], MDA-MB-468 [UNC Lineberger Tissue Culture Facility], and MDA-MB-231 (Otey Lab, UNC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gemini) and 1% MEM non-essential amino acids (Gibco), with the addition of 10 μg/ml insulin for MDA-MB-436 cells. The human normal breast epithelial cell line (ME16C, Perou lab) was cultured in MEBM (Lonza). All cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Generation of docetaxel-resistant MDA-MB-436 TNBC cell line

Docetaxel-resistant MDA-MB-436 cells (MDA-436-DCXR) were established by culturing in growth media supplemented with increasing concentrations of docetaxel (5 nM to 50 nM) over a 9-month period. Cells at approximately 40–50% confluency were incubated with a selected concentration for 48 h followed by recovery in drug-free growth media. The concentration of docetaxel was incrementally increased until the cells were resistant, at a final concentration of 50 nM docetaxel (MDA-436-DCXR). Parental MDA-MB-436 cells (MDA-436-PR) were cultured and passaged in parallel in drug-free growth media to control for extended time in culture.

Reagents

Docetaxel (Tocris), recombinant TRAIL (PeproTech), z-VAD-fmk (Enzo Life Sciences), TRAIL-R2 (DR5) neutralizing antibody (R&D system), and human control IgG (Jackson Immuno Research) were used to treat the cell lines.

CIB1 targeting via RNA interference in the absence and presence of docetaxel or TRAIL

Construction of control and CIB1 shRNA lentiviral plasmids has been described previously [8, 9]. Two different CIB1 targeting sequences (shCIB1-1 and shCIB1-2) were used to validate shRNA-induced CIB1 depletion. To knock down CIB1, cells of interest at ~ 30% confluence were infected with lentiviral shRNA containing 6 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma) for 16–18 h followed by replacement with fresh growth media. After 24 h, the shRNA-infected cells were treated with vehicle, docetaxel, or TRAIL for an additional 48 h. Treated cells were then harvested 4 days post-infection, during which time transduction efficiency exceeds 90% as determined by GFP fluorescence.

Trypan blue exclusion assay

Cell death was determined by trypan blue exclusion using automated fluorescently activated cell sorting (FACS) counting. Aliquots of 10 μl of both adherent and floating cell populations were collected and stained with 0.004% trypan blue (1:10 dilution). Stained dead cells were selected and counted using the Per-CP (APC) channel [22]. Quantification of total live and dead cell populations was determined using an Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data are presented as percent cell death.

TRAIL-R1 and -R2 fluorescence detection

To detect surface expression of TRAIL-R1 and -R2, 2 × 105 cells were detached using 2 mM EDTA, washed in PBS, and resuspended in PBS (0.1% BSA) containing antibodies for TRAIL-R1/DR4, TRAIL-R2/DR5 (eBiosciences) or IgG control. AlexaFluor 647 (Invitrogen) secondary antibody was used to detect the levels of TRAIL-R1/2, and mean fluorescence intensity was measured via Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer.

Western blotting

Cells were harvested and lysed with buffer containing 10 mM CHAPS as previously described [8]. Equal amounts of protein based on total cell number were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membrane, and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies against rabbit, mouse, and chicken were then used to visualize the immunoblots via enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL2, Pierce). The following antibodies were used in this study: PARP, GAPDH, cleaved caspase-8, caspase-8, cleaved caspase-9, caspase-9, TRAIL-1/DR4, TRAIL-R2/DR5, IGF-1R, phospho-JNK, and total JNK (Cell Signaling), CIB1 (chicken polyclonal antibody, [9]), vinculin (Sigma), Alix (Biolegend).

Mitochondrial membrane potential detection

To detect changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, cells were stained with JC-1 (Thermofisher), a cationic dye that accumulates in the mitochondria. Cells (1 × 106) were dissociated and incubated in PBS containing JC-1 (5 µM) for 30 min at 37 °C. JC-1 accumulates in functional mitochondria to form aggregates that fluoresce red. In dysfunctional mitochondria with decreased membrane potential, JC-1 will instead remain as monomers that fluoresce green. After washing with PBS, the emission of JC-1 fluorescence was analyzed using an Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer and associated software (BD Biosciences). Therefore, calculation of red:green JC-1 fluorescence ratio was used as the surrogate for changes in mitochondrial membrane potential.

Microscopy imaging

To assess morphological changes induced by CIB1 depletion in the absence and presence of docetaxel or TRAIL, cells were imaged in 6-well plates at the conclusion of each experiment. Differential interference contrast (DIC) images were captured using a Nikon TE300 microscope equipped with an Andor Zyla sCMOS camera (20x objective).

Statistics

The statistically significant differences were determined using either a one-way ANOVA or student’s two-tailed t-test. More details on p-values are indicated in the figure legends.

Results

CIB1 depletion selectively enhances docetaxel-induced TNBC cell death

We previously reported that CIB1 depletion leads to TNBC cell death while sparing normal cells [8], suggesting that CIB1 may be a viable, safe target. To address the need to enhance tumor cell death and maintain tolerability by normal cells, we tested the targeting of CIB1 via RNA interference in combination with the commonly used chemotherapeutic agent, docetaxel, in both TNBC and a normal breast epithelial cell line. Two different CIB1 shRNA sequences (shCIB1-1 and shCIB1-2) were used to validate CIB1 depletion (Additional file 2: Figure S1A). CIB1 depletion-induced cell death quantification, cell death signaling, and cellular morphology were also validated using both shRNA sequences (Additional file 2: Figure S1B–H) and Western blots were quantified in Additional file 1: Table S1. Since similar results were observed with both shRNA sequences, we chose CIB1 shRNA-1 for the remainder of the experiments.

To test whether the combination of CIB1 depletion and docetaxel enhances cell death, we selected three different TNBC cell lines based on their sensitivity to CIB1 depletion-MDA-MB-436 (sensitive, Fig. 1a), MDA-MB-468 (sensitive, Fig. 1b), and MDA-MB-231 (insensitive, Fig. 1c) [8]. Dosages of docetaxel that caused 30–50% TNBC cell death were chosen to be combined with CIB1 depletion (Fig. 1). We found that CIB1 depletion enhanced docetaxel-induced cell death more effectively in CIB1 depletion-sensitive (Fig. 1a, b) versus insensitive cells (Fig. 1c). The enhanced TNBC MDA-MB-436 cell death was indistinguishable with either shCIB1-1 or -2 alone or combined with docetaxel (Additional file 2: Figure S1B). In contrast, CIB1 depletion alone or in combination with docetaxel did not significantly increase cell death in normal breast epithelial ME16C cells (Fig. 1d), suggesting that CIB1 targeting may improve chemotherapeutic efficacy by tumor-selective killing.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

CIB1 depletion in combination with docetaxel enhances cell death and increases caspase activation in TNBC but not normal ME16C cells. Combination of CIB1 depletion with docetaxel in both TNBC and normal cells was tested. Cells were infected with control or CIB1 shRNA for 2 days before addition of vehicle (DMSO) or the indicated concentrations of docetaxel for 48 h. Percent cell death in a MDA-436 TNBC (n = 5), b MDA-468 TNBC (n = 3), c MDA-231 TNBC (n = 3), and d ME16C normal breast epithelial cells (n = 4) was quantified via a trypan blue exclusion assay from both adherent and floating cell populations. Lysates prepared from cells in a–d [n = 5; 3; 3; 4, respectively] were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies (lower panels). Data represent mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001, ANOVA)

To elucidate the mechanism underlying the enhanced TNBC cell death induced by CIB1 depletion plus docetaxel (Fig. 1a–c), we analyzed cell lysates for cleaved PARP, a marker of apoptosis. In agreement with the observed enhanced cell death, the combined treatment-induced PARP cleavage was only observed in TNBC (Fig. 1a–c) but not normal breast epithelial ME16C cells (Fig. 1d). CIB1 knockdown was confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 1a–d). Collectively, our results indicate that the novel combination of CIB1 depletion and docetaxel selectively enhances TNBC cell death via increased apoptotic signaling.

CIB1 depletion with docetaxel induces death receptor-mediated apoptosis

To further understand the apoptotic signaling mechanisms induced by CIB1 depletion in combination with docetaxel, we asked whether death receptor-mediated or mitochondrial apoptosis, which are initiated by caspase-8 and caspase-9, respectively, contributed to the observed cell death. We detected degradation of inactive pro-caspase-8 and the appearance of active or cleaved caspase-8, but not caspase-9, in CIB1-depleted cells treated with docetaxel (Fig. 2a and Additional file 2: Figure S1C). In contrast, we detected minimal caspase-8 activity in CIB1-depleted cells alone (Fig. 2a and Additional file 2: Figure S1C), suggesting that CIB1 depletion may prime TNBC cells for death receptor-mediated apoptosis. Comparable effects on apoptotic signaling induced by CIB1 depletion alone or with docetaxel was also observed using CIB1 shRNA-2 (Additional file 2: Figure S1C). We additionally probed for caspase-10, a controversial marker of death receptor-mediated apoptosis [23], and found no further caspase-10 activation upon combination treatments (data not shown). Caspase-3, a downstream substrate of caspase-8, was also activated by the combination treatment (Fig. 2a). In contrast, we did not observe caspase activation in control or CIB1-depleted ME16C normal breast epithelial cells with or without docetaxel (Fig. 2b). CIB1 depletion in combination with docetaxel also selectively activated caspase-8 in two additional TNBC cell lines, MDA-468 (Additional file 3: Figure S2A) and MDA-231 cells (Additional file 3: Figure S2B). Collectively, these results suggest that death receptor-mediated apoptotic signaling contributes mechanistically to enhanced cell death induced by the combination of CIB1 depletion and docetaxel selectively in TNBC cells, regardless of their sensitivity to CIB1 depletion.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

CIB1 depletion combined with docetaxel enhances death receptor-mediated apoptotic signaling. Docetaxel-induced caspase-8 and -3 activation is enhanced in CIB1-depleted MDA-436 but not normal ME16C cells. Control or CIB1-depleted a MDA-436 TNBC (n = 5) and b ME16C normal breast epithelial cells (n = 4) were treated with docetaxel as in Fig. 1. Lysates prepared from each cell line were probed for pro-caspase-8, cleaved caspase-8, pro-caspase-9, cleaved caspase-9, cleaved caspase-3, CIB1, and vinculin (loading control)

CIB1 depletion sensitizes TNBC, but not normal cells to TRAIL

Since CIB1 depletion enhances docetaxel-induced TNBC cell death via increased death receptor signaling, we investigated the link between CIB1 depletion and two cytotoxic death receptors, TRAIL (TRAIL-R) and Fas. Treatment of CIB1-depleted MDA-436 cells with Fas ligand had no effect on cell death or caspase-8 activation (data not shown), and therefore was not pursued further. However, treatment with TRAIL caused a dose-dependent increase in PARP cleavage (Fig. 3a). Notably, CIB1 depletion sensitized MDA-436 cells to TRAIL, resulting in a synergistic increase in cell death (Fig. 3a and Additional file 2: Figure S1D). In contrast, CIB1 depletion plus TRAIL failed to induce PARP cleavage and cell death in normal ME16C cells (Fig. 3b), indicating that this combination is highly selective in killing TNBC while sparing normal cells. Further, the enhanced cell death correlated with active or cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-8, but not caspase-9, in CIB1 shRNA-1 and shRNA-2 depleted MDA-436 TNBC cells (Fig. 3c and Additional file 2: Figure S1E) not ME16C cells (Fig. 3d). Caspase-8 activation was also confirmed by the corresponding degradation of inactive pro-caspase-8 (Fig. 3c). Although we did not detect caspase-9 activation (Fig. 3c), staining with the mitochondrial dye JC-1 revealed increased mitochondrial dysfunction in CIB1-depleted cells alone and in combination with both TRAIL and docetaxel (Additional file 4: Figure S3A). Caspase-8 can cleave the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 member, Bid, which is an important mediator of mitochondrial dysfunction [24]. Consistent with our JC-1 results, we detected increased Bid cleavage in CIB1 depleted cells treated with either docetaxel or TRAIL (Additional file 4: Figure S3B, C), further suggesting apoptotic cell death.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

CIB1 depletion sensitizes MDA-436 TNBC but not normal ME16C cells to TRAIL. Combination of CIB1 depletion with TRAIL in both TNBC and normal cells was tested. Cells were infected with control or CIB1 shRNA for 2 days before the addition of vehicle (water) or the indicated concentrations of a death receptor ligand TRAIL for 48 h. Percent cell death quantified via trypan blue exclusion using a MDA-436 TNBC (n = 4) and b ME16C normal breast epithelial cell lines (n = 3). Data represent mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001, ANOVA). CIB1 depletion plus TRAIL enhanced caspase-8 and -3 activation. Representative Western blot for pro-caspase-8, cleaved caspase-8, pro-caspase-9, cleaved caspase-9, cleaved caspase-3, CIB1, and vinculin in c MDA-436 TNBC (n = 3) and d ME16C cells (n = 3)

Interestingly, we also observed a similar increase in caspase-8 activation and cell death upon addition of TRAIL to CIB1-depleted MDA-468 (Additional file 5: Figure S4A) but not MDA-231 TNBC cells (Additional file 5: Figure S4B). This suggests that the cell death induced by the combination of CIB1 depletion and TRAIL, unlike that induced by docetaxel, is cell-type specific based on sensitivity to CIB1 depletion. Thus, adding TRAIL to CIB1 depletion-sensitive cells is a potent combination for inducing caspase-8 activation and cell death.

TRAIL-R2 upregulation by CIB1 depletion sensitizes TNBC cells to TRAIL

Because CIB1 depletion sensitizes TNBC cells to TRAIL, we asked whether this effect was due to increased TRAIL-R expression. We measured cell-surface and whole cell expression of TRAIL-R1 (DR4) and/or -R2 (DR5) using flow cytometry and Western blotting, respectively. We found that TRAIL-R2, but not TRAIL-R1, was upregulated on the surface of CIB1-depleted versus control MDA-436 TNBC cells, starting 2 days post-infection with both CIB1-1 and CIB1-2 shRNA sequences (Fig. 4a, b; Additional file 2: Figure S1F, G). This was notable because TRAIL was added 2 days post-infection and coincides with acquired sensitivity to TRAIL. Whole cell expression levels of TRAIL-R2 also increased with CIB1 depletion starting at Day 2, but more significantly at Day 3 post-infection (Fig. 4c). Next, to confirm that TRAIL-R2 upregulation upon CIB1 depletion was responsible for sensitizing MDA-436 cells to TRAIL, we blocked TRAIL-R2 function by pre-treating control or CIB1-depleted MDA-436 TNBC cells with a neutralizing (TRAIL-R2 Fc) antibody. Blocking TRAIL-R2 prevented the increased cell death induced by TRAIL in CIB1-depleted cells (Fig. 4d). Further, this rescue of cell viability by the TRAIL-R2 neutralizing antibody was also associated with decreased PARP cleavage and caspase-8-activation, whereas the upregulation of TRAIL-R2 by CIB1 depletion remained intact (Fig. 4e). These results indicate that CIB1 depletion-induced TRAIL-R2 upregulation sensitizes TNBC cells to TRAIL.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

CIB1 depletion upregulates TRAIL-R2 expression Death receptors TRAIL-R1/R2 levels in MDA-436 cells were measured at Days 2, 3, and 4 post-infection with either control or CIB1 shRNA. a FACS analysis shows upregulation of cell surface levels of TRAIL-R2, but not TRAIL-R1, starting at 2, 3 and 4 days post-infection (2nd and 3rd row) with CIB1 shRNA (red) relative to control (black). b Mean ± SD (n = 3) of fluorescence intensities of CIB1 shRNA-infected MDA-436 cells normalized to control cells shown in a. c Representative western blot (n = 3) showing increased whole cell expression of TRAIL-R2, but not TRAIL-R1, in CIB1-depleted MDA-436 cells at 3 and 4 days post-infection with CIB1 shRNA. d TRAIL-R2 neutralizing antibody blocks TRAIL-induced cell death in CIB1-depleted cells. Control or CIB1-depleted MDA-436 cells were pre-treated with either IgG control or TRAIL-R2 neutralizing antibody (TRAIL-R2 Fc, 1 ng/ml) for 24 h before addition of vehicle (water) or 10 ng/ml recombinant TRAIL ligand for 48 h (n = 3). Cell death was quantified as in Fig. 1 (**P < 0.01). e Blocking TRAIL-R2 inhibits TRAIL-induced PARP cleavage and caspase-8 activation in CIB1-depleted MDA-436 cells. Representative Western blot of PARP, TRAIL-R2, cleaved caspase-8, CIB1, and GAPDH (loading control) in treatment groups shown in d) (n = 3)

CIB1 depletion plus docetaxel or TRAIL induces caspase-independent cell death

To confirm apoptosis as the primary mechanism underlying the observed death of CIB1-depleted MDA-436 TNBC cells with or without docetaxel/TRAIL, we pre-treated cells with the pan-caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk (z-VAD). Surprisingly, we found that z-VAD partially rescued MDA-436 cell viability induced by CIB1 depletion in combination with either docetaxel (Fig. 5a) or TRAIL (Fig. 5b) despite complete inhibition of caspase-8 and caspase-3 activation (Fig. 5c, d). These results led us to investigate the contribution of caspase-independent cell death mechanisms. Phenotypically, we noticed that CIB1 depletion alone induced cellular swelling and intracellular vacuolization (Additional file 2: Figure S1H), which are characteristic of autophagic, necroptotic, or paraptotic modes of caspase-independent non-apoptotic cell death [16, 17, 25]. After detecting no changes in LC-III and p-RIPK1 levels, markers of autophagy and necroptosis, respectively (data not shown), those modes of cell death seemed less likely. We then assessed ALG-2-interacting protein X (Alix) protein expression levels, which correlate inversely with induction of paraptosis [17, 18]. We detected decreased Alix expression upon CIB1 depletion in combination with either docetaxel (Fig. 5c) or TRAIL (Fig. 5d) (0.3- or 0.08-fold respectively). Even with z-VAD pre-treatment, we detected decreased Alix expression in response to CIB1 depletion plus docetaxel or TRAIL (0.6- or 0.7-fold respectively, Fig. 5c, d), suggesting paraptosis as a non-apoptotic component of cell death. Because paraptosis can also be mediated by IGF-1R signaling and JNK activation [17] we probed for IGF-1R expression and phospho-JNK. We found that CIB1 depletion alone led to increased IGF-1R expression, and the combination treatment activated JNK signaling, further supporting the involvement of paraptosis (Additional file 6: Figure S5A). Although not a specific inhibitor of paraptosis (protein synthesis inhibitor), pre-treatment using cycloheximide rescued CIB1 depleted TNBC cells (Additional file 6: Figure S5B). These findings suggest that CIB1 depletion combined with docetaxel or TRAIL induces paraptosis.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

CIB1 depletion in combination with docetaxel or TRAIL induces caspase-independent cell death. Pre-treatment using a pan-caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk (z-VAD) helped to determine contributions of caspase-independent, non-apoptotic cell death mechanisms induced by the combination treatments. Control or CIB1-depleted cells were pretreated with vehicle (DMSO) or 50 µM z-VAD-fmk (z-VAD) for 24 h before adding a 10 nM docetaxel or b 10 ng/ml TRAIL for 48 h. The concentrations for docetaxel and TRAIL were chosen because we observed a sufficient increase in cell death and caspase-8 activity when combined with CIB1 depletion. Percent cell death was quantified as in Fig. 1, represented by mean ± SD, *P < 0.05 (n = 3). z-VAD inhibits caspase-8 but does not affect PARP activation or the expression of a marker of paraptosis, Alix. Lysates prepared from control or CIB1-depleted cells in a and b treated with c docetaxel or d TRAIL were probed with for PARP, cleaved caspase-8, cleaved caspase-3, Alix, CIB1, and vinculin (loading control). Western blot is representative of 3 independent experiments

Docetaxel-resistant TNBC cells remain sensitive to CIB1 depletion alone or in combination with docetaxel or TRAIL

Defective apoptosis is one mechanism of resistance and a major obstacle for effective chemotherapy [15]. Therefore, we asked whether CIB1 depletion overcomes resistance by restoring apoptosis. To answer this question, we generated docetaxel-resistant MDA-MB-436 cells (MDA-436-DCXR). Resistance was confirmed by comparing the EC50 of docetaxel in parental (MDA-436-PR; 3 nM) versus resistant (MDA-436-DCXR; 219 nM) cells (Additional file 7: Figure S6A). CIB1 depletion alone or with docetaxel (Fig. 6a) or TRAIL (Fig. 6b) induced significant cell death in docetaxel-resistant MDA-436-DCXR cells. Western blotting analysis showed that although docetaxel-induced caspase-8 activity is compromised in MDA-436-DCXR resistant cells, CIB1 depletion alone and in combination with docetaxel restored caspase-8 activity in these cells (Fig. 6c). Contrary to previous findings, caspase-8 activity was not detected in CIB1-depleted MDA-436-PR parental cells with or without docetaxel/TRAIL (Fig. 6c). This may be due to alterations in caspase activities [26] resulting from extended culturing of MDA-436–PR cells during the process of establishing MDA-436-DCXR cells (> 9 months with > 60 passages). Unexpectedly, CIB1 depletion plus TRAIL caused nearly complete death of MDA-436-DCXR cells (Fig. 6b), which may explain an apparent lack of GAPDH expression (Fig. 6c) due to the lysates being composed of mostly floating dead cells. The nearly complete MDA-436-DCXR cell death correlated with a more profound caspase-8 activation (Fig. 6c). This further amplification of caspase-8 activity could be due to increased cell surface expression of both TRAIL-R1 and -R2 on CIB1-depleted MDA-436-DCXR cells as opposed to only TRAIL-R2 in CIB1-depleted MDA-436-PR cells (Additional file 7: Figure S6B, C). Whole cell expression levels of TRAIL-R2 increased with CIB1 depletion in MDA-436-DCXR cells (Additional file 7: Figure S6D). These results suggest that CIB1 depletion alone and in combination with either docetaxel or TRAIL has the potential to overcome chemo-resistance.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Docetaxel resistant MDA-436 cells are sensitive to CIB1 depletion alone and in combination with docetaxel or TRAIL. To determine whether chemo-resistance is overcome by the combination treatments, cell death and its mechanism were analyzed. Control or CIB1-depleted MDA-436-PR (parental) and MDA-436-DCXR (docetaxel-resistant) cells were treated with either a vehicle control (DMSO) or 10 nM docetaxel (n = 3), b or 5 ng/ml TRAIL ligand (n = 3) for 48 h. Percent cell death shown in mean ± SD was quantified as in Fig. 1. c Western blots showing increased caspase-8 activation and decreased Alix expression in CIB1-depleted MDA-436-DCXR cells alone or in combination with docetaxel or TRAIL, representative of 3 individual experiments. GAPDH was used as a loading control. d Representative DIC images (20×) of control or CIB1-depleted parental (MDA-436-PR) and MDA-436-DCXR cells treated with either vehicle or 10 nM docetaxel or 5 ng/ml. Insets show characteristics of paraptotic morphology in CIB1-depleted cells in the absence or presence of docetaxel/TRAIL

Since another strategy to circumvent chemo-resistance is to induce non-apoptotic, caspase-independent cell death [16], we asked whether paraptosis also occurs in docetaxel-resistant cells. Indeed, we found that either CIB1 depletion alone or in combination with docetaxel or TRAIL decreased Alix levels in MDA-436-DCXR cells (Fig. 6c). Moreover, paraptotic morphologies such as swelling and intracellular vacuole formation were observed in resistant cells in response to CIB1 depletion alone or in combination with docetaxel/TRAIL (Fig. 6d). The morphology of CIB1-depleted cells mimicked the effects of docetaxel (Fig. 6d), a parental compound to paclitaxel, which is known to cause paraptotic morphology at high doses [27]. Although the combination treatments did not activate the JNK pathway, CIB1 depletion alone led to upregulation of IGF-1R, an upstream effector of paraptosis, in docetaxel-resistant TNBC cells similar to that observed in parental cells (Additional file 7: Figure S6E). These results collectively show that the combination treatments both restore apoptosis and induce paraptosis as potential mechanisms to overcome chemo-resistance.

Discussion

The standard of care for TNBC patients, chemotherapy and/or surgery, often fails due to development of resistance and toxicity [3, 28]. To address this need, clinical trials have centered on combining targeted therapies with chemotherapeutics, yet resistance and toxicity persist to limit the overall efficacy [2, 4–6]. Our previous work indicated that CIB1 may be a potentially safe target due to its selectivity for killing TNBC but not normal cells when depleted [8]. Therefore, we tested a novel combination treatment with CIB1 depletion and a commonly used chemotherapeutic, docetaxel to enhance TNBC-selective cell death.

In this study, we focused on detecting and understanding the mechanisms of cell death to assess the combination of CIB1 depletion and chemotherapeutics. Many previous pre-clinical cell culture-based TNBC studies that combine targeted agents with chemotherapeutics have focused primarily on slowing cell proliferation as opposed to cell death [29–32]. Moreover, studies that have quantified cell death were often limited to studying classical caspase-dependent apoptosis [33–36]. In contrast, we investigated both apoptotic and non-apoptotic TNBC cell death in response to CIB1 depletion alone or in combination with docetaxel. In addition, we demonstrate that induction of non-apoptotic cell death is an effective strategy to circumvent resistance, which is often associated with dysfunctional apoptotic signaling [16, 37, 38]. Thus, we propose that quantification of cell death in tumor versus normal cells may identify combinations that eradicate tumors while sparing normal cells, which may be a better indicator for a safer, more efficacious therapy.

Initially, we found that combining CIB1 depletion with docetaxel significantly enhances TNBC cell death while sparing normal breast epithelial cells. The enhanced cell death correlated with increased death receptor-mediated (caspase-8) apoptotic signaling, selectively in TNBC relative to normal cells. Subsequently, we found that the combination of CIB1 depletion and the death receptor ligand TRAIL is potent in selectively killing TNBC cells via increased caspase-8 activation. While TNBC cells are inherently resistant to TRAIL alone, CIB1 depletion appears to sensitize these cells to TRAIL by upregulating TRAIL receptor-2. Once believed to be a safe, tumor-specific targeting therapy, TRAIL as a mono-therapy failed due to resistance driven by mutations in TRAIL receptors and dysfunctional signaling complexes at the receptor intracellular domain [10, 11, 39]. Subsequent studies have focused on combination approaches using chemotherapeutics, natural compounds and targeted agents to sensitize otherwise resistant breast cancer cells to TRAIL by upregulating TRAIL receptors and restoring TRAIL receptors’ intracellular signaling complex activity [14, 40–45]. In comparison, our approach of targeting CIB1 allowed us to use five to tenfold lower concentrations of TRAIL to induce as much or greater cytotoxicity in cultured TNBC cells. The selectivity of TRAIL-based combination treatments for tumor cells is consistent between our results and the published results of other studies [14, 43, 45]. However, those studies provide limited understanding as to why normal cells are unaffected by TRAIL-based combination treatments. We speculate that CIB1 depletion may upregulate decoy receptors, which inhibit intracellular TRAIL receptor signaling and initiate pro-survival NF-κB signaling [46, 47] (data not shown), thereby protecting normal breast epithelial cells from TRAIL-induced cell death. Another mechanism may involve the internalization of TRAIL receptors and expression of intracellular signaling complex modulators such as c-FLIP, XIAP, and IAP in normal cells, to explain TNBC-selective cell death. We believe that a better understanding of cell death mechanisms underlying tumor selectivity versus normal cells could provide further rationale to test a TRAIL-based combination treatment with CIB1 targeting.

The induction of non-apoptotic death could prove to be an effective therapeutic strategy to circumvent resistance [16, 38, 48, 49]. In addition to previously identifying GAPDH nuclear translocation [9], we found paraptosis as another mode of non-apoptotic cell death associated with CIB1 depletion. To our knowledge, we are the first to report paraptosis as a mechanism for overcoming chemoresistance in TNBC cells. While autophagy is another mode of non-apoptotic cell death that shares phenotypic characteristics similar to paraptosis, we did not observe activation of LC-III, a marker of autophagy. Necroptosis, like apoptosis, can be activated downstream of death receptors to cause a caspase-independent paraptotic-like, necrotic phenotype [50]. However, we found no effect on the necrotic marker p-RIPK or the necroptosis inhibitor necrostatin-1 and therefore concluded that CIB1 depletion alone or in combination with either docetaxel or TRAIL does not induce necroptosis. Because pre-treatment with cycloheximide, a protein synthesis inhibitor, rescued CIB1 depleted TNBC cells from cell death, protein synthesis may be investigated to further understand non-apoptotic cell death in relation to CIB1. Future studies examining non-apoptotic modes of cell death associated with CIB1 targeting will provide additional insight into mechanisms to circumvent chemo-resistance.

Conclusions

In summary, we find that targeting CIB1 in combination with docetaxel or TRAIL is selective in killing TNBC over normal breast epithelial cells. Also, both combinations restore apoptosis and induce non-apoptotic cell death to overcome resistance (Fig. 7), suggesting well-tolerated and durable treatment options. Hence, we speculate that CIB1 as a target may provide new avenues for formulating effective combination therapies not only for TNBC but other cancers as well.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Model of cell death mechanisms induced by CIB1 depletion alone or in combination with docetaxel/TRAIL. The combination of CIB1 targeting via RNA interference and docetaxel/TRAIL activates both apoptotic and non-apoptotic (paraptotic) signaling to induce TNBC-selective cell death and overcome chemo-resistance. Caspase-3/-8 activation and decreased Alix levels were used as markers of apoptosis and paraptosis, respectively

Abbreviations

TNBC: 

triple-negative breast cancer

AKT: 

protein kinase B

ERK: 

extracellular regulated kinase

CIB1: 

calcium integrin-binding protein 1

TRAIL: 

tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand

EGFR: 

epidermal growth factor receptor

PI3K: 

phosphoinositide 3-kinase

MEK: 

mitogen-activated protein kinase

DR4/5: 

death receptor 4/5

Alix: 

ALG-2-interacting protein X

shRNA: 

short hairpin RNA

FACS: 

fluorescence-activated cell sorting

z-VAD-fmk: 

carbobenzoxy-valyl-alanyl-aspartyl-[O-methyl]-fluoromethylketone

LC-III: 

microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3B

p-RIPK1: 

phosphorylated receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1

c-FLIP: 

cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein

XIAP: 

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis

IAP: 

inhibitor of apoptosis

GAPDH: 

glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

PARP: 

poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase

PBS: 

phosphate-buffered saline

JC-1: 

tetraethyl benzimidazolyl carbocyanine iodide

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AHC: study conception and design and data acquisition and interpretation and manuscript writing; TML: study conception and design and manuscript review; GJD, MMB, ALK: data acquisition and interpretation; LVP: study supervision and manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscirpt.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Wolfgang Bergmeier for sharing his flow cytometer (Accuri C6, BD Biosciences) and the software to perform fluorescence cell death analysis. Dr. Perou, Dr. Otey, and UNC Lineberger Tissue Culture Facility kindly provided the TNBC cell lines tested. We also thank Karel Alcedo for establishing the automated trypan blue exclusion assay via flow cytometry.

Competing interests

TM Leisner and LV Parise are co-founders of Reveris Therapeutics, LLC. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data including additional information generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. All original data are available upon request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant 2017BIG6515 from the North Carolina Biotechnology Center, R41CA200189 from the NIH, and a fellowship from the Graduate School at UNC Chapel Hill.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7365, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
(2)
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7260, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
(3)
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

References

  1. Gelmon K, Dent R, Mackey JR, Laing K, McLeod D, Verma S. Targeting triple-negative breast cancer: optimising therapeutic outcomes. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(9):2223–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Crown J, O’Shaughnessy J, Gullo G. Emerging targeted therapies in triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 6):vi56–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15 Pt 1):4429–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. O’Reilly EA, Gubbins L, Sharma S, Tully R, Guang MH, Weiner-Gorzel K, et al. The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). BBA Clin. 2015;3:257–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Baselga J, Albanell J, Ruiz A, Lluch A, Gascon P, Guillem V, et al. Phase II and tumor pharmacodynamic study of gefitinib in patients with advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(23):5323–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Carey LA, Rugo HS, Marcom PK, Mayer EL, Esteva FJ, Ma CX, et al. TBCRC 001: randomized phase II study of cetuximab in combination with carboplatin in stage IV triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(21):2615–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nabholtz JM, Chalabi N, Radosevic-Robin N, Dauplat MM, Mouret-Reynier MA, Van Praagh I, et al. Multicentric neoadjuvant pilot Phase II study of cetuximab combined with docetaxel in operable triple negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(9):2274–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Black JL, Harrell JC, Leisner TM, Fellmeth MJ, George SD, Reinhold D, et al. CIB1 depletion impairs cell survival and tumor growth in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;152(2):337–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Leisner TM, Moran C, Holly SP, Parise LV. CIB1 prevents nuclear GAPDH accumulation and non-apoptotic tumor cell death via AKT and ERK signaling. Oncogene. 2013;32(34):4017–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lemke J, von Karstedt S, Zinngrebe J, Walczak H. Getting TRAIL back on track for cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21(9):1350–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang L, Fang B. Mechanisms of resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2005;12(3):228–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Refaat A, Abd-Rabou A, Reda A. TRAIL combinations: the new ‘trail’ for cancer therapy (Review). Oncol Lett. 2014;7(5):1327–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. So J, Pasculescu A, Dai AY, Williton K, James A, Nguyen V, et al. Integrative analysis of kinase networks in TRAIL-induced apoptosis provides a source of potential targets for combination therapy. Sci Signal. 2015;8(371):rs3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Strekalova E, Malin D, Rajanala H, Cryns VL. Metformin sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer to proapoptotic TRAIL receptor agonists by suppressing XIAP expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;163(3):435–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Pommier Y, Sordet O, Antony S, Hayward RL, Kohn KW. Apoptosis defects and chemotherapy resistance: molecular interaction maps and networks. Oncogene. 2004;23(16):2934–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tait SW, Ichim G, Green DR. Die another way—non-apoptotic mechanisms of cell death. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 10):2135–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sperandio S, Poksay K, de Belle I, Lafuente MJ, Liu B, Nasir J, et al. Paraptosis: mediation by MAP kinases and inhibition by AIP-1/Alix. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(10):1066–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosh K, De S, Das S, Mukherjee S, Sengupta Bandyopadhyay S. Withaferin A induces ROS-mediated paraptosis in human breast cancer cell-lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0168488.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bissig C, Gruenberg J. ALIX and the multivesicular endosome: ALIX in Wonderland. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(1):19–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yoon MJ, Kim EH, Lim JH, Kwon TK, Choi KS. Superoxide anion and proteasomal dysfunction contribute to curcumin-induced paraptosis of malignant breast cancer cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48(5):713–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ram BM, Ramakrishna G. Endoplasmic reticulum vacuolation and unfolded protein response leading to paraptosis like cell death in cyclosporine A treated cancer cervix cells is mediated by cyclophilin B inhibition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843(11):2497–512.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Avelar-Freitas BA, Almeida VG, Pinto MC, Mourao FA, Massensini AR, Martins-Filho OA, et al. Trypan blue exclusion assay by flow cytometry. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2014;47(4):307–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sprick MR, Rieser E, Stahl H, Grosse-Wilde A, Weigand MA, Walczak H. Caspase-10 is recruited to and activated at the native TRAIL and CD95 death-inducing signalling complexes in a FADD-dependent manner but can not functionally substitute caspase-8. EMBO J. 2002;21(17):4520–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Schug ZT, Gonzalvez F, Houtkooper RH, Vaz FM, Gottlieb E. BID is cleaved by caspase-8 within a native complex on the mitochondrial membrane. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(3):538–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsujimoto Y. Multiple ways to die: non-apoptotic forms of cell death. Acta Oncol. 2012;51(3):293–300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Pronsato L, La Colla A, Ronda AC, Milanesi L, Boland R, Vasconsuelo A. High passage numbers induce resistance to apoptosis in C2C12 muscle cells. Biocell. 2013;37(1):1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shiau JY, Nakagawa-Goto K, Lee KH, Shyur LF. Phytoagent deoxyelephantopin derivative inhibits triple negative breast cancer cell activity by inducing oxidative stress-mediated paraptosis-like cell death. Oncotarget. 2017;8(34):56942–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(8):2329–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Corkery B, Crown J, Clynes M, O’Donovan N. Epidermal growth factor receptor as a potential therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(5):862–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, Sanders ME, Chakravarthy AB, Shyr Y, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2750–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bauer JA, Ye F, Marshall CB, Lehmann BD, Pendleton CS, Shyr Y, et al. RNA interference (RNAi) screening approach identifies agents that enhance paclitaxel activity in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(3):R41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Peleg R, Bobilev D, Priel E. Topoisomerase I as a target of erlotinib and gefitinib: efficacy of combined treatments with camptothecin. Int J Oncol. 2014;44(3):934–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. McClendon AK, Dean JL, Rivadeneira DB, Yu JE, Reed CA, Gao E, et al. CDK4/6 inhibition antagonizes the cytotoxic response to anthracycline therapy. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(14):2747–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Beuvink I, Boulay A, Fumagalli S, Zilbermann F, Ruetz S, O’Reilly T, et al. The mTOR inhibitor RAD001 sensitizes tumor cells to DNA-damaged induced apoptosis through inhibition of p21 translation. Cell. 2005;120(6):747–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hastak K, Alli E, Ford JM. Synergistic chemosensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines to poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibition, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. Cancer Res. 2010;70(20):7970–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Mondesire WH, Jian W, Zhang H, Ensor J, Hung MC, Mills GB, et al. Targeting mammalian target of rapamycin synergistically enhances chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(20):7031–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Okada H, Mak TW. Pathways of apoptotic and non-apoptotic death in tumour cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(8):592–603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Han W, Li L, Qiu S, Lu Q, Pan Q, Gu Y, et al. Shikonin circumvents cancer drug resistance by induction of a necroptotic death. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(5):1641–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Trivedi R, Mishra DP. Trailing TRAIL resistance: novel targets for TRAIL sensitization in cancer cells. Front Oncol. 2015;5:69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Mauro-Lizcano M, Lopez-Rivas A. Glutamine metabolism regulates FLIP expression and sensitivity to TRAIL in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Shigeno M, Nakao K, Ichikawa T, Suzuki K, Kawakami A, Abiru S, et al. Interferon-alpha sensitizes human hepatoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis through DR5 upregulation and NF-kappa B inactivation. Oncogene. 2003;22(11):1653–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Hung CM, Liu LC, Ho CT, Lin YC, Way TD. Pterostilbene enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis through the induction of death receptors and downregulation of cell survival proteins in TRAIL-resistance triple negative breast cancer cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65(51):11179–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh TR, Shankar S, Chen X, Asim M, Srivastava RK. Synergistic interactions of chemotherapeutic drugs and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand/Apo-2 ligand on apoptosis and on regression of breast carcinoma in vivo. Cancer Res. 2003;63(17):5390–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Allensworth JL, Aird KM, Aldrich AJ, Batinic-Haberle I, Devi GR. XIAP inhibition and generation of reactive oxygen species enhances TRAIL sensitivity in inflammatory breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(7):1518–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Abdelhamed S, Yokoyama S, Hafiyani L, Kalauni SK, Hayakawa Y, Awale S, et al. Identification of plant extracts sensitizing breast cancer cells to TRAIL. Oncol Rep. 2013;29(5):1991–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang S, El-Deiry WS. TRAIL and apoptosis induction by TNF-family death receptors. Oncogene. 2003;22(53):8628–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Hu WH, Johnson H, Shu HB. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptors signal NF-kappaB and JNK activation and apoptosis through distinct pathways. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(43):30603–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Su Z, Yang Z, Xie L, DeWitt JP, Chen Y. Cancer therapy in the necroptosis era. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(5):748–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Bury M, Girault A, Megalizzi V, Spiegl-Kreinecker S, Mathieu V, Berger W, et al. Ophiobolin A induces paraptosis-like cell death in human glioblastoma cells by decreasing BKCa channel activity. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e561.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Christofferson DE, Yuan J. Necroptosis as an alternative form of programmed cell death. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22(2):263–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us