Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Primary research
  • Open access
  • Published:

MTHFR C677T genetic polymorphism in combination with serum vitamin B2, B12 and aberrant DNA methylation of P16 and P53 genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal precancerous lesions: a case–control study

Cancer Cell International volume 19, Article number: 288 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The study aimed to explore the associations between the interactions of serum vitamin B2 or B12 levels, aberrant DNA methylation of p16 or p53 and MTHFR C677T polymorphism and the risks of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal precancerous lesion (EPL).

Methods

200 ESCC cases, 200 EPL cases and 200 normal controls were matched by age (± 2 years) and gender. Serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels, MTHFR C677T genetic polymorphisms and the methylation status of genes were assessed. Chi square test, one-way analysis of variance and binary logistic regression were performed.

Results

The lowest quartile of both serum vitamin B2 and B12 with TT genotype showed significant increased EPL risk (OR = 4.91, 95% CI 1.31–18.35; OR = 6.88, 95% CI 1.10–42.80). The highest quartile of both serum vitamin B2 and B12 with CC genotype showed significant decreased ESCC risk (OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.60; OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.46). The ORs of p16 methylation for genotype CT and TT were 1.98 (95% CI 1.01–3.89) and 17.79 (95% CI 2.26–140.22) in EPL, 4.86 (95% CI 2.48–9.50) and 20.40 (95% CI 2.53–164.81) in ESCC, respectively. Similarly, p53 methylation with genotype TT was associated with increased EPL and ESCC risks (OR = 13.28, 95% CI 1.67–105.70; OR = 15.24, 95% CI 1.90–122.62).

Conclusions

The MTHFR C677T genotype and serum vitamin B2 or B12 levels may interact in ways which associated with the EPL and ESCC risks. The gene–gene interaction suggested that aberrant DNA methyaltion of either p16 or p53 combined with T alleles of MTHFR was associated with increased risks of both EPL and ESCC.

Background

Esophageal cancer (EC), the eighth commonest cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, has extremely low 5-year survival rate of approximately 15–25% owing to its aggressive nature and often being diagnosed in late stages [1]. The two histological sub-types of EC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), have almost completely distinct etiologic and pathologic characteristics, geographic patterns, time trends and major risk factors [2]. ESCC accounts for about 90% cases of EC each year, and it is the predominant type of EC in the developing world, such as in China. It is known that ESCC is associated with a complex combination of genetic, environmental and dietary factors, but many causes of ESCC vary among different regions [2]. Mild, moderate and severe esophageal squamous dysplasia, the recognized esophageal precancerous lesions (EPL) for ESCC, are associated with approximately 3-, 10-, and 30-fold higher risk of ESCC than normal [3,4,5]. Studies illustrated that some risk or protective factors may be similar for both EPL and ESCC [6].

Deficiencies of some certain micronutrients, such as folate and vitamin B6 which are the key methyl donor and cofactor for the enzyme serine hydroxymethyltransferase respectively, have been recognized as the risk factors for cancers including ESCC [7, 8]. Folate and other B vitamins like B2, B6 and B12 play important roles in the one-carbon metabolism pathway, which is associated with DNA methylation, synthesis and impaired DNA repair [9]. 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), the central enzyme in folate metabolism, is involved in the circulation form of folate as it catalyzes the irreversible reduction of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. Then the catalysis of methionine synthase is responsible for the reaction of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate and homocysteine and the generation of methionine [10]. These cycles require sufficient concentrations of vitamin B2 and B12 as cofactors for the enzymes MTHFR and methionine synthase, otherwise folate will become trapped as 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate or 5-methyltetrahydrofolate and the generation of methionine will be negatively impacted [11]. However, the association between vitamin B2 intake and EC risk is not yet entirely understood, and the conclusion has been inconsistent [7]. Several studies illustrated that high intake or plasma concentration of vitamin B12 were associated with increased risk of cancers including EC [7, 12,13,14], but the mechanism remains unclear and epidemiological studies have always showed inconsistent findings [8, 15]. Additionally, nucleotide substitution of C to T at nucleotide 677, the commonest polymorphism for MTHFR gene, results in an alanine to valine replacement so that the activity of MTHFR is reduced [16]. Over the past decade, relations between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and aberrant DNA methylation with the risk of ESCC called for more concern, but the available data remains incomplete and the results are limited [10, 17].

In addition, it is known that carcinogenesis is a multistep process at the genetic level and associated with hundreds of genes thus far. Gene p16 (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) and p53 (tumor protein p53) are important tumor suppressor genes located on chromosome 9p21 and 17p13, respectively. They play essential regulatory roles in the G1 cell cycle pathway which is associated with tumorigenesis when becoming dysfunctional [18]. Studies have indicated that p16 methylation and p53 mutations are frequently found in ESCC [19,20,21,22,23], suggesting that genetic and epigenetic alterations in p16 and p53 are involved in the pathogenesis of ESCC [18, 24]. Aberrant DNA promoter hypermethylation in the normal p16 gene was reported to be responsible for the inactivation of p16 gene and the silence of the corresponding gene which is involved in carcinogenesis of esophagus [18]. Meanwhile, it was reported that both p53 mutations and single-nucleotide polymorphism in codon 72 of p53 gene are associated with esophageal carcinogenesis [21,22,23]. However, the methylation in the p53 promoter in ESCC is rarely studied and gains more concern recently [25].

Our previous study indicated that MTHFR C677T polymorphism may further modify associations between serum concentration of folate and risk of ESCC, but no statistically significant results were found with the risk of EPL [26]. Here, to explore the roles and possible interactions of serum vitamin B2 and B12 concentrations, MTHFR C677T polymorphism and aberrant DNA methylation of cancer-related genes including p16 and p53 in ESCC and EPL, we carried out a molecular epidemiological study in a Chinese population with extremely high incidence of ESCC.

Materials and methods

Study site

Huai’an District, Huai’an City, is an inland rural area in the Northern Jiangsu Province of China with a population with high risk for EC (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Huai’an District established a cancer registry report that the incidence of EC among adults above 40 years old in Huai’an District was 208.09/100,000 from 2008 to 2012, meanwhile, the crude incidence and mortality of EC were 96.15/100,000 and 63.25/100,000, respectively [27]. Our previous studies indicated that environmental exposures, some demographic parameters and genetic polymorphism may play important roles in the esophageal carcinogenesis in this endemic region [27, 28]. Recently, a distinct epidemiological pattern of EPL was observed in Huai’an District. Alcohol drinking plays on a minor role in EPL and excessive smoking shows a significant association. The risk factors which are likely to influence both sexes equally, such as environmental exposures like passive smoking, consuming shallow well water, river water and lake water as the source of drinking water, and dietary factors like frequent intake of pickled food, fried food, hot food, corn and corn flour, and low intake of nuts, bean foods, edible fungi, animal livers, fruits and vegetables, are supposed to take the main responsibility for the development of ESCC [27]. To promote the prevention and definitive treatment of EC and meet the requirements for cost-effectiveness, the government and Cancer Foundation of China have conducted the Early Diagnosis and Early Treatment Project of Esophageal Cancer (EDETPEC) in Huai’an District since 2010. Baseline data and blood samples were collected immediately when participants were enrolled in the project.

EPL diagnosis

During the EDETPEC, each participant was required to undergo a routine endoscopy examination. 10 ml of 1.2% Lugol’s iodine solution was sprayed on the esophageal mucosa uniformly and then mucosal staining was observed. Normal esophageal mucosa would turn brown (iodine-positive), whereas dysplastic lesions would remain unstained (iodine-negative). Subsequently, unstained tissues were sampled, biopsies were oriented on filter paper, placed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin and transferred to the pathology laboratory. The biopsies were processed to paraffin blocks, prepared on the slides, then stained with hematoxylin–eosin for histopathological examination. Precancerous lesion for ESCC, which is so called dysplasia, can be classified into mild, moderate and severe dysplasia referring to its histological criteria which were initially illustrated in the 1970s [29, 30] and then modified according to the experience in China [31]. Squamous dysplasia requires the loss of normal cell polarity, the presence of nuclear atypia including nuclear enlargement, pleomorphism and hyperchromatism, and abnormal tissue maturation without invasion of epithelial cells through the basement membrane [6].

Study population

Between January 2010 and December 2013, 200 diagnosed EPL cases and 200 normal controls aged from 40 to 79 were selected from a total of approximately 5000 residents who had been recruited and undergone a routine endoscopy examination in the EDETPEC. Subsequently, 200 newly diagnosed ESCC cases were selected from Huai’an District cancer registry system during the same period of time. Groups of 200 EPL cases, 200 ESCC cases and 200 normal controls were matched by age (± 2 years) and gender with each other. Individuals who had had a history of cancer, taken vitamin B supplements recently, undergone esophageal cancer surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy were not included. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Southeast University Zhongda Hospital with approval number 2012ZDllKY19.0, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Additionally, all the participants signed informed consent forms.

Data collection

When obtaining informed consent, trained interviewers collected epidemiological data of socio-demographics, lifestyle, eating habits by face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire. Participants who smoked at least one cigarette or had at least, on average, one alcoholic drink per day continuously for at least 6 months in one’s whole life, were defined as smokers or drinkers. Additionally, 5 ml 12 h fasting blood sample from each participant was collected and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min to obtain separated serum and leukocyte, then they were stored in the − 80 °C refrigerator immediately.

Determination of serum vitamin B2 and B12

Serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels were determined by double-antibody-sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Vitamin B2 and B12 (human) ELISA kits (Shanghai FanKe industrial Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China) were used in the procedure. All operations were in strict accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Optical density (OD) values at a wavelength of 450 nm were measured using a multimode microplate reader (Mithras LB 940, Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany), and then concentrations of serum vitamin B2 and B12 were calculated accordingly.

Detection of MTHFR polymorphism and DNA methylation

Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocyte samples by using Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification kit (A1120, Promega, WI, USA). MTHFR C677T genetic polymorphisms were assessd by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) with the sense primer 5′-CGA AGC AGG GAG CTT TGA GGC TG-3′ and the antisense primer 5′-AGG ACG GTG CGG TGA GAG TG-3′. A PCR premix kit (SK2072, Sangon, Shanghai, China) was used to conduct PCR amplification, and the process was carried out in an automated themocycler (AG6321, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The PCR condition was initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 67 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 60 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were digested overnight at 37 °C with restriction endonuclease Hinf I (R0155 V, New England Biolabs, UK) for recognizing and cutting the variant type sequence. The digestive PCR products were resolved on 3% agarose gel and visualized under UV illumination after being stained with ethidium bromide (Additional file 2: Fig. S2(a)). The wild genotype CC has one band of 233 bp. The heterozygote CT has three bands of 233, 176 and 57 bp, and the variant genotype TT has two bands of 176 and 57 bp.

The methylation status at the promoter region of gene p16 and p53 was assessd by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) after sodium bisulfate modification of DNA [32]. The primers used for p16 were methylated sense primer 5′-TTA TTA GAG GGT GGG GCG GAT CGC-3′ and antisense primer 5′-GAC CCC GAA CCG CGA CCG TAA-3′, and unmethylated sense primer 5′-TTA TTA GAG GGT GGG GTG GAT TGT-3′ and antisense primer 5′-CAA CCC CAA ACC ACA ACC ATA A-3′. The primers used for p53 were methylated sense primer 5′-GTA GTT TGA ACG TTT TTA TTT TGG C-3′ and antisense primer 5′-CCT ACT ACG CCC TCT ACA AAC G-3′, and unmethylated sense primer 5′-GTA GTT TGA ATG TTT TTA TTT TGG T-3′ and antisense primer 5′-CCT ACT ACA CCC TCT ACA AAC A-3′. PCR products were loaded onto 2% agarose gel and visualized after being stained with ethidium bromide (Additional file 2: Fig. S2(b)).

Statistical analysis

Baseline data were double-entered and validated in an established database with Epidata version 3.1 and then processed in Microsoft Excel. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package SPSS version 17 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences in the serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels, distribution of socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle, methylation and genotype frequencies among controls, EPL and ESCC cases were evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi square (χ2) test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), wherever appropriate. The continuous variables of serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels were categorized into quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4) based on the levels of normal controls. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess the association between serum vitamin B2 or B12 level and risk of EPL or ESCC. The effects of interaction of serum vitamin B2 or B12 level and MTHFR C667T genotype on the risk of EPL and ESCC, and the joint effects of MTHFR C667T genotype and DNA methylation on the risks of EPL and ESCC were evaluated using a multiplicative interaction model based on logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for confounding variables including gender, age, tobacco use and alcohol use. Results were expressed by calculated odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), and statistical significance was considered as p < 0.05 (two-tailed).

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the subjects

In this study, 200 normal controls, 200 diagnosed EPL cases and 200 newly diagnosed ESCC cases with mean age of 62.69 ± 5.37, 61.29 ± 6.60 and 62.28 ± 6.49 years were enrolled and required to be age- (± 2 years) and gender-matched. In all, 106 pairs were males and 94 pairs were females. As shown in Table 1, ANOVA indicated that there was no statistical significance in age among three groups (p > 0.05).

Table 1 Age characteristics of participants (years, mean ± SD)
Full size table

Serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels of the subjects

The distributions of serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels in normal controls, EPL cases and ESCC cases are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1. Kruskal–Wallis test indicated that there were statistical significances in both vitamin B2 and B12 among three groups (p < 0.01). In addition, compared with control group, both EPL and ESCC groups showed statistical significances in vitamin B2 level, and only ESCC group showed statistical significance in vitamin B12 level (p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test). However, no statistical significance was found in both vitamin B2 and B12 between EPL group and ESCC group (p > 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test).

Table 2 Serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels in three groups ((Median (25th–75th))
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

a Box and whiskers plot of serum vitamin B2 level in three groups. b Box and whiskers plot of serum vitamin B12 level in three groups. The box values range from 25 to 75 percentiles of 200 subjects; the line within the box represents the median. The T-shaped bars at both sides of the box represent values ranging from 5 to 25 and 75 to 95 percentiles; the dots represent outliers

Full size image

The association between serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels and risk of EPL and ESCC

Serum vitamin B2 and B12 concentrations were classified into quartiles. As shown in Table 3, results indicated that the highest quartile of serum vitamin B2 was inversely associated with the risk of both EPL (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.11–0.51) and ESCC (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.08–0.44) when compared with the lowest quartile. The highest quartile of serum vitamin B12 was inversely associated with the risk of ESCC (OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.07–0.42) when compared with the lowest quartile. However, the second lowest quartiles of both vitamin B2 and B12 were associated with the increased risk of ESCC when compared with the lowest quartiles (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.10–3.26; OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.08–3.24).

Table 3 Associations between serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels and risk of EPL and ESCC
Full size table

MTHFR C677T polymorphism and DNA methylation in the study subjects

The proportions of CC, CT and TT genotypes were 49.5%, 41.0% and 9.5% in control group, 42.5%, 40.0% and 17.5% in EPL group, and 42.0%, 48.5% and 9.5% in ESCC group, respectively (Table 4). Hardy–Weinberg calculation was performed for control group, and no significant deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg expectation was observed (χ2 = 0.11, p = 0.74). Compared with control group, EPL group had a higher proportion of variant genotype TT and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 5.79, p < 0.05). The frequency of T allele in EPL group was higher than that in control group as well (χ2 = 5.03, p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of CT, TT genotypes and T allele between ESCC and control groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, our finding of Chi square test showed that p16 methylation was associated with 58% and 216% increases in the risk of EPL and ESCC, respectively (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, p53 methylation was associated with 121% increase in the risk of ESCC (p < 0.05).

Table 4 Genotype and allele frequencies for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and DNA methylation in EPL cases, ESCC cases and healthy controls
Full size table

Based on the significant results of the comparison of MTHFR C677T genotype and allele frequencies between EPL and controls provided by Tables 4 and 5 further illustrated the internal comparison of genotype and allele frequencies for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism among mild, moderate and severe EPL cases by Chi square test. There was no statistically significant difference between mild and moderate EPL cases, whereas TT genotype and T allele were more frequent in severe EPL cases than in mild EPL cases (OR = 4.19, 95% CI 1.41–12.44; OR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.29–4.21).

Table 5 Genotype and allele frequencies for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism in mild, moderate and severe EPL cases
Full size table

Interaction between serum vitamin B2, B12 and MTHFR C677T polymorphism

The interaction between serum vitamin B2, B12 and MTHFR C677T genotype was determined by logistic regression analysis using controls, EPL and ESCC cases. As shown in Table 6, after adjustment for gender, age, tobacco smoking and alcoholic drinking, the interaction of the lowest quartile of both serum vitamin B2 and B12 with MTHFR C677T genotypes in EPL showed significant increased risk for variant genotype TT (OR = 4.91, 95% CI 1.31–18.35; OR = 6.88, 95% CI 1.10–42.80). The interaction of the highest quartile of both serum vitamin B2 and B12 with MTHFR C677T genotypes in ESCC showed significant decreased risk for wild genotype CC (OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.60; OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.46), as well as for heterozygote CT (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.77; OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05–0.62). Interestingly, heterozygote CT along with the second lowest quartile of both serum vitamin B2 and B12 conferred an approximately twofold increased ESCC risk (OR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.13–5.30; OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.10–5.17), and the results of vitamin B2 and B12 showed similarity to some degree. However, the variant genotype TT along with the highest quartile of serum vitamin B12 conferred a tenfold increased EPL risk (OR = 10.08, 95% CI 2.22–45.71).

Table 6 Association between vitamin B2, B12 with the MTHFR C677T genotype and the risk of EPL and ESCC
Full size table

Interaction between DNA methylation and MTHFR C677T polymorphism

Results were adjusted for potential confounders including gender, age, tobacco smoking and alcoholic drinking. The methylation statuses of p16 and p53 in EPL and ESCC cases were significantly associated with MTHFR C677T genotypes. Compared with the wild genotype CC, no statistically significant difference was found in genotype CT or TT in both EPL and ESCC when p16 or p53 was unmethylated (Table 7). However, the ORs of p16 methylation for genotype CT and TT were 1.98 (95% CI 1.01–3.89) and 17.79 (95% CI 2.26–140.22) in EPL, 4.86 (95% CI 2.48–9.50) and 20.40 (95% CI 2.53–164.81) in ESCC, respectively. Similarly, p53 methylation with variant genotype TT was associated with increased risks of EPL and ESCC (OR = 13.28, 95% CI 1.67–105.70; OR = 15.24, 95% CI 1.90–122.62).

Table 7 Association between DNA methylation with the MTHFR C677T genotype and the risk of EPL and ESCC
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we tried to evaluate the possible association and interaction of epigenetics and genetics, serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels and the risks of EPL and ESCC in the high-incidence area of Northern Jiangsu Province of China. Our study suggested that: firstly, healthy controls were more likely to have higher levels of vitamin B2 and B12 than ESCC cases; secondly, variant genotype TT and the T allele were associated with significantly increased risk of EPL; thirdly, the MTHFR C677T genotype may modify association between serum vitamin B2 or B12 levels and the risks of EPL and ESCC; fourthly, gene–gene interaction was observed as there were strong association between the interaction of p16 and p53 methylations and MTHFR C677T polymorphism and the risks of EPL and ESCC.

To the best of our knowledge, the MTHFR C677T variant is a C to T transition in exon 4 at nucleotide 677 and results in an alanine to valine replacement at position 222 of the MTHFR amino acid sequence [33]. Compared with homozygous wild genotype CC, the activity of MTHFR was observed to reduce by 35% and 70% for heterozygote CT and variant genotype TT, respectively [34]. Previous study also indicated that genetic polymorphisms of enzymes involved in folate metabolism might have an influence on neoplasia in the esophagus, and TT genotype is usually along with lower serum folate levels and higher homocysteine levels than homozygous wild genotype [35, 36].

Individually, both the serum levels of vitamin B2 and B12 and the MTHFR C677T genotypes may be associated with the risks of EPL and ESCC. However, the serum levels of vitamin B2 and B12 and the MTHFR C677T genotypes interact in ways which has a different effect on the EPL and ESCC risks. For the homozygous wild genotype CC subjects who have normal activity of MTHFR, high serum levels of vitamin B2 and B12 were significantly associated with reduced risk of EPL or ESCC. For the heterozygote CT, high serum levels of vitamin B2 and B12 showed the similar but weaker trends compared with the genotype CC. Vitamin B2 and B12 play the roles of cofactors for the enzymes MTHFR and methionine synthase. Insufficient available cofactors leads to folate becoming trapped as 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate or 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, whereas the generation of methionine is inhibited and the levels of homocysteine and related metabolites are increased because the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine intersects with this process of the folate cycle, but increased levels of homocysteine within the cell are reported to be toxic [11]. Additionally, the folate cycle is essential for purine and pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis and thus has a great role in the formation and stability of DNA, RNA and nucleoside triphosphates [37, 38]. Therefore, vitamin B deficiency in folate cycle can cause the altered expression of critical proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes by negatively affecting DNA methylation, which may be an important step toward neoplasia [39].

It has consistently been demonstrated that vitamin B2 and B12 are essential for normal growth, development and physiological functions [11]. The combination of Table 2 and Fig. 1 show that compared with control group, EPL group had significantly poorer nutritional status of vitamin B2, and ESCC group had significantly poorer nutritional status of both vitamin B2 and B12. Previous study also indicated that a poor nutritional status and unbalanced diet were related to an elevated risk of cancer [40]. However, the possible roles of vitamin B2 and B12 in the etiology of ESCC are very complex, because they may have different impacts on this tumor development under different conditions at different stages of initiation, promotion and progression [41]. For example, preventing tumor initiation during the early stage of carcinogenesis, whereas promoting cancer development during the later stage in carcinogenesis (i.e., once precancerous lesions are established) can be possible [9, 42, 43]. Our study indicated that the interaction between the serum levels of vitamin B2 and B12 and the variant genotype TT was associated with both significant and non-significant tendencies for increased risk in the precancerous stage of esophageal carcinogenesis. The variant homozygotes TT for the C677T variant only has 30% MTHFR enzyme activity of the homozygous wild genotype CC, consequently the utilization rate of cofactors such as vitamin B2 and B12 is reduced in the folate cycle. Therefore, the MTHFR 677T allele may negate some of the protective effect of vitamin B2 and B12 in this way, and the corresponding impaired DNA methylation, synthesis and repair may be responsible for the development of precancerous lesions. In individuals with the homozygous wild genotype CC who had the lowest quartile of serum vitamin B12 level as reference, those with the homozygous mutation TT who had the highest quartile of serum vitamin B12 level had an tenfold increase in EPL risk (p < 0.05). It is possible to hypothesize that the subjects with TT genotype who had extremely low MTHFR enzyme activity may consume very low amount of vitamin B12 as cofactor in the folate cycle, thus the concentration of vitamin B12 in serum still remained high. Previous studies demonstrated that high intake of vitamin B12 can lead to increased level of the universal methyl donor S-adenosyl methionine and consequently result in the higher activity of DNA methyltransferase enzymes, which plays a role in the self-renewal of cancer stem cells and affect neoplasia and metastasis [44,45,46]. On the other hand, a population-based case–control study in Connecticut found the similar result and inferred that vitamin B12 can be a marker for consumption of animal-derived foods because vitamin B12 is derived exclusively from these foods such as red meat, which is associated with high risk of ESCC [47]. Additionally, B vitamins including folate, vitamin B6, B9 and B12 have been found to have a double-edged sword effect on cancer due to their dual role in carcinogenesis by possessing dual modulatory effects that are time and dose dependent [48,49,50]. As we know, the development of cancer typically has a very long latency period, thus the possibility that there might be preventive or harmful effects of B vitmians on cancer within the long period of time cannot be excluded [49].

However, the results so far in the field appear to differ significantly by individual. On the other hand, because of the limitation of the case–control study in establishing a causal association in this study, the low levels of vitamin B2 and B12 may also be a consequence, but not a risk factor for ESCC. It is possible that the ESCC cases are more likely to be on poor nutritional status due to cachexia, and tumor growth may result in metabolic disorder of vitamin B2 and B12 in ESCC cases. Thus further studies establishing the causal association and evaluating the mechanism are needed.

In this study, we have noted a high frequency of both p16 and p53 promoter methylation among both EPL and ESCC subjects. This finding is in line with previous studies on p16 and p53 methylation and ESCC [18, 19]. Here, the hypermethylation of p53 promoter was associated with silencing of protein expression of the gene. Because as an important tumor suppressor gene, p53 is essential for regulating cell division and preventing tumor formation, the silencing of it may be associated with the development of tumor and a higher risk of ESCC. In addition, p53 promoter methylation was also frequently found in variety of malignancies, such as breast carcinomas, gliomas, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, hepatocellular carcinomas and ovarian cancer [51,52,53,54,55]. Similarly, p16 silencing was also associated with the DNA methylation in the p16 promoter, which suggests that p16 silencing in ESCC may be a frequent event in the endemic region. A previous study has assessed the DNA methylation status in each sample based on the probe located in the p16 promoter CpG island, and reported that inactivation of p16 was present in 76% of both EAC and ESCC. However, the epigenetic silencing of p16 was frequent in EAC, whereas relatively rare in ESCC [56]. The inconsistency of the results between studies may differ in study regions, study design and study samples: firstly, Vietnamese patients were the only Asian population studied in the previous study, and other populations were from Eastern European and America continent. However, these populations are not able to represent rural population in China as they have completely different patterns of epidemiology, and the geographic distribution of ESCC varies greatly [2]; Secondly, the tested samples were different, such as blood samples and tissue samples. During the development of carcinogenesis, it has been found that epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes by aberrant DNA methylation is an early major event [10, 18], but the interaction between aberrant DNA methylation and the MTHFR 677T allele cannot be ruled out. Our study demonstrated the gene–gene interaction between p16 and p53 methylations and MTHFR C677T polymorphism, suggesting that they may have an even greater role to play in cancer development than the single effect seen to date. After adjustment for potential confounding variables, the present study found that subjects carrying genotypes CT or TT and methylated genes p16 or p53 had high risks for EPL and ESCC, especially variant genotype TT. As reported previously, the activity of MTHFR is involved in the DNA methylation process, and MTHFR C677T polymorphism and folate status can interact in ways which affect DNA methylation status as well [17, 57]. Individuals carrying CT or TT genotype are more likely to have significant risk of DNA hypermethylation [10, 17]. However, so far it is still controversial about the role of MTHFR genetic polymorphisms because it may also have a dual role in the cancer development depending on different conditions including folate status, and the interaction between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and aberrant DNA methylation may vary from gene to another [17]. Despite decades of research on cancer-related genes, resulting in a staggering number of publications, researchers are only beginning to grasp the full complexity of the gene pathways and their intercations.

Based on our results, one of the important implications of this study was to detect the population who may be susceptible to ESCC by finding and applying eligible biomarkers, so as to improve the work of early diagnosis of ESCC. An exciting clue was obtained by the results that combining the detection of MTHFR C677T polymorphism and aberrant DNA methylation of p16 and p53 can find the individual who has extremely high risk of ESCC or EPL. However, this study also had limitation. It should also be pointed as the limitation of the case–control study in establishing a causal assocaition.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this case–control study evaluated the association and interaction of epigenetics and genetics, serum vitamin B2 and B12 levels and the risks of EPL and ESCC in a high risk rural area in the Northern Jiangsu Province of China. Healthy controls were more likely to have higher levels of vitamin B2 and B12 than ESCC cases, and the MTHFR C677T genotype may modify the association between serum concentrations of vitamin B2 and B12 and the risks of EPL and ESCC. The gene–gene interaction suggested the possible crosstalk between the aberrant DNA methyaltion of either p16 or p53 and T alleles of MTHFR. In the future, further large-scale prospective studies on cancers are required to bring a more extensive understanding of DNA methylation, gene expression, dietary and environmental factors and their possible interactions in carcinogenesis, thus many novel and unexpected discoveries will be made, even leading to a reversal of earlier conclusions.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article. Due to our internal policy, raw data cannot be shared.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

CDC:

center for disease control and prevention

CI:

confidence intervals

EAC:

esophageal adenocarcinoma

EC:

esophageal cancer

EDETPEC:

Early Diagnosis and Early Treatment Project of Esophageal Cancer

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

EPL:

esophageal precancerous lesion

ESCC:

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

MTHFR:

methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

MSP:

methylation-specific PCR

OD:

optical density

OR:

odds ratios

PCR–RFLP:

polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism

References

  1. Arnal MJD, Arenas ÁF, Arbeloa ÁL. Esophageal cancer: risk factors, screening and endoscopictreatment in Western and Eastern countries. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:7933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:360–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rustgi AK, El-Serag HB. Esophageal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold M, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, et al. Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Gut. 2015;64:381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang G, Abnet C, Shen Q, et al. Histological precursors of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a 13 year prospective follow up study in a high risk population. Gut. 2005;54:187–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor PR, Abnet CC, Dawsey SM. Squamous dysplasia—the precursor lesion for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2013;22:540–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiang Y, Li Q, Xin Y, et al. Intake of dietary one-carbon metabolism-related B vitamins and the risk of esophageal cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2018;10:835.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao Q, Freedman ND, Ren J, et al. Intakes of folate, methionine, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 with risk of esophageal and gastric cancer in a large cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:1328–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Folate and cancer—timing is everything. JAMA. 2007;297:2408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen J, Huang ZJ, Duan YQ, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation of P16, MGMT, and hMLH1 genes in combination with MTHFR C677T genetic polymorphism and folate intake in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;13:5303–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rush EC, Katre P, Yajnik CS. Vitamin B12: one carbon metabolism, fetal growth and programming for chronic disease. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:2–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matejcic M, de Batlle J, Ricci C, et al. Biomarkers of folate and vitamin B12 and breast cancer risk: report from the EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:1246–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hultdin J, Van Guelpen B, Bergh A, et al. Plasma folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study. Int J Cancer. 2005;113:819–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Price AJ, Travis RC, Appleby PN, et al. Circulating folate and vitamin B12 and risk of prostate cancer: a collaborative analysis of individual participant data from six cohorts including 6875 cases and 8104 controls. Eur Urol. 2016;70:941–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. de Vogel S, Meyer K, Fredriksen A, et al. Serum folate and vitamin B12 concentrations in relation to prostate cancer risk—a Norwegian population-based nested case-control study of 3000 cases and 3000 controls within the JANUS cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:201–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson SC, Giovannucci E, Wolk A. Folate intake, MTHFR polymorphisms, and risk of esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1271–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Sasco AJ, Fu C, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation of P16, MGMT, and hMLH1 genes in combination with MTHFR C677T genetic polymorphism in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:118–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Das M, Sharma SK, Sekhon GS, et al. p16 gene silencing along with p53 single-nucleotide polymorphism and risk of esophageal cancer in Northeast India. Tumour Biol J Int Soc Oncodev Biol Med. 2017;39:1010428317698384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu R, Wang F, Wu L, et al. A systematic review of hypermethylation of p16 gene in esophageal cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2013;13:215–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Das M, Saikia BJ, Sharma SK, et al. p16 hypermethylation: a biomarker for increased esophageal cancer susceptibility in high incidence region of North East India. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:1627–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao Y, Tan W, Zhang S. P53 gene codon 72 polymorphism and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case/control study in a Chinese population. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:139–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao LJ, Zhao XL, Wu XM, et al. Association of p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis based on 14 case-control studies. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013;17:721–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piao JM, Kim HN, Song HR, et al. p53 codon 72 polymorphism and the risk of esophageal cancer: a Korean case-control study. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:596–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hibi K, Taguchi M, Nakayama H, et al. Molecular detection of p16 promoter methylation in the serum of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:3135–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu Y, Zabihula B, Yibulayin W, et al. Methylation and expression of RECK, P53 and RUNX genes in patients with esophageal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:5293–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang GL, Wang SK, Su M, et al. Serum folate, MTHFR C677T polymorphism and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk. Biomed Environ Sci. 2013;26:1008–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pan D, Su M, Zhang T, et al. a distinct epidemiologic pattern of precancerous lesions of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a high-risk area of Huai’an, Jiangsu Province, China. Cancer Prevent Res. 2019;12:449–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Z, Tang L, Sun G, et al. Etiological study of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in an endemic region: a population-based case control study in Huaian, China. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ismail-Beigi F, Horton PF, Pope CE 2nd. Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology. 1970;58:163–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weinstein WM, Bogoch ER, Bowes KL. The normal human esophageal mucosa: a histological reappraisal. Gastroenterology. 1975;68:40–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dawsey SM, Lewin KJ, Liu FS, et al. Esophageal morphology from Linxian, China. Squamous histologic findings in 754 patients. Cancer. 1994;73:2027–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Park HJ, Yu E, Shim YH. DNA methyltransferase expression and DNA hypermethylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2006;233:271–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Langevin SM, Lin D, Matsuo K, et al. Review and pooled analysis of studies on MTHFR C677T polymorphism and esophageal cancer. Toxicol Lett. 2009;184:73–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bailey LB, Gregory JF. Polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and other enzymes: metabolic significance, risks and impact on folate requirement. J Nutr. 1999;129:919–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang CX, Matsuo K, Ito H, et al. Gene-environment interactions between alcohol drinking and the MTHFR C677T polymorphism impact on esophageal cancer risk: results of a case-control study in Japan. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1285–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ulvik A, Ueland PM, Fredriksen A, et al. Functional inference of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677 C > T and 1298A > C polymorphisms from a large-scale epidemiological study. Hum Genet. 2007;121:57–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sinclair KD, Allegrucci C, Singh R, et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:19351–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lillycrop KA. Effect of maternal diet on the epigenome: implications for human metabolic disease. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011;70:64–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Choi SW, Mason JB. Folate and carcinogenesis: an integrated scheme. J Nutr. 2000;130:129–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar A, Kumari S, Poojary D, et al. Estimation of serum micronutrient levels and the possible risk of oral cancer and premalignancy. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2014;3:8360–3.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Siassi F, Ghadirian P. Riboflavin deficiency and esophageal cancer: a case control-household study in the Caspian Littoral of Iran. Cancer Detect Prev. 2005;29:464–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ulrich CM. Folate and cancer prevention: a closer look at a complex picture. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:271–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith AD, Kim YI, Refsum H. Is folic acid good for everyone? Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:517–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu AY, Scherer D, Poole E, et al. Gene-diet-interactions in folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism modify colon cancer risk. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57:721–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Morita R, Hirohashi Y, Suzuki H, et al. DNA methyltransferase 1 is essential for initiation of the colon cancers. Exp Mol Pathol. 2013;94:322–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pathania R, Ramachandran S, Elangovan S, et al. DNMT1 is essential for mammary and cancer stem cell maintenance and tumorigenesis. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mayne ST, Risch HA, Dubrow R, et al. Nutrient intake and risk of subtypes of esophageal and gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2001;10:1055–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kim YI. Folate: a magic bullet or a double edged sword for colorectal cancer prevention? Gut. 2006;55:1387–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang SM, Cook NR, Albert CM, et al. Effect of combined folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 on cancer risk in women: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;300:2012–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Brasky TM, White E, Chen CL. Long-term, supplemental, one-carbon metabolism-related vitamin B use in relation to lung cancer risk in the vitamins and lifestyle (VITAL) cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3440–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kang JH, Kim SJ, Noh DY, et al. Methylation in the p53 promoter is a supplementary route to breast carcinogenesis: correlation between CpG methylation in the p53 promoter and the mutation of the p53 gene in the progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma. Lab Invest. 2001;81:573–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Amatya VJ, Naumann U, Weller M, et al. TP53 promoter methylation in human gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;110:178–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Agirre X, Vizmanos JL, Calasanz MJ, et al. Methylation of CpG dinucleotides and/or CCWGG motifs at the promoter of TP53 correlates with decreased gene expression in a subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Oncogene. 2003;22:1070–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pogribny IP, James SJ. Reduction of p53 gene expression in human primary hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with promoter region methylation without coding region mutation. Cancer Lett. 2002;176:169–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chmelarova M, Krepinska E, Spacek J, et al. Methylation in the p53 promoter in epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2013;15:160–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim J, Bowlby R, Mungall AJ, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature. 2017;541:169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Friso S, Choi SW, Girelli D, et al. A common mutation in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene affects genomic DNA methylation through an interaction with folate status. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5606–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants, researchers and collaborators for their contribution.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81673147, 81372985), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2242017K40035) and the General Program of University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province (No. 17KJB190001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering of Ministry of Education, and Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People’s Republic of China

    Da Pan, Ting Zhang, Lingmeng Fu, Jie Wei, Shaokang Wang & Guiju Sun

  2. Huai’an District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huai’an, 223200, People’s Republic of China

    Ming Su

  3. Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, 224005, People’s Republic of China

    Guiling Huang

  4. Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210009, People’s Republic of China

    Pengfei Luo

Authors
  1. Da Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guiling Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pengfei Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ting Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lingmeng Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jie Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shaokang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Guiju Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DP made interpretation of data and drafted the work; MS, PFL collected all the samples; GLH conducted the experiments and analysed the data; TZ, LMF and JW helped with the experiments; SKW and GJS designed and supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shaokang Wang or Guiju Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Southeast University Zhongda Hospital with approval number 2012ZDllKY19.0, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All the participants signed informed consent forms.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Map of location of Huai’an District in China. Reprinted from Map of Huai’an by Maphill, April 2 2019, retrieved from http://www.maphill.com/china/jiangsu/huaian/maps/physical-map/Copyright 2013 by Maphill.

Additional file 2: Figure S2. (a)

RFLP photograph of 3% agarose gel electrophoresis representing MTHFR C667T polymorphism. Lane 1 was characterized by single 233 bp representing wild genotype CC; lanes 2, 3, 4, 5 were characterized by 233, 176 and 57 bp representing heterozygote CT; lane 6 was characterized by 176 and 57 bp representing variant genotype TT; lane M represents DNA marker. (b) Photograph of 2% agarose gel electrophoresis representing results of methylation-specific PCR analysis for gene p16 and p53 by using both methylated (M) and unmethylated (U) specific primers. A, EPL case; B and C, ESCC cases; D, normal control; M, marker.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, D., Su, M., Huang, G. et al. MTHFR C677T genetic polymorphism in combination with serum vitamin B2, B12 and aberrant DNA methylation of P16 and P53 genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal precancerous lesions: a case–control study. Cancer Cell Int 19, 288 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-1012-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-1012-x

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us