Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Primary research
  • Open access
  • Published:

The Ibr-7 derivative of ibrutinib radiosensitizes pancreatic cancer cells by downregulating p-EGFR

Cancer Cell International volume 20, Article number: 458 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Radiotherapy is one of the main treatments for pancreatic cancer, but radiation resistance limits its clinical application. As a result, novel therapeutic agents to improve radiosensitivity are urgently needed. This study aimed to investigate the effect of Ibr-7 (a derivative of ibrutinib) on the radiosensitivity of human pancreatic cancer cells.

Methods

The effect of Ibr-7 on pancreatic cancer cell proliferation was detected by CCK-8 assays. Radiosensitivity was assessed by clonogenic formation assays. Cell cycle and cell apoptosis were analysed by flow cytometry. DNA damage was evaluated by immunofluorescence analysis. The expression levels of PARP, Cleaved caspase 3, p-EGFR and EGFR were determined by western blot.

Results

Ibr-7 showed an anti-proliferative effect on PANC-1 and Capan2 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Ibr-7 (2 μmol/L) enhanced the effect of radiation on PANC-1 and Capan2 cells. Further findings showed that this combination enhanced G2/M phase arrest and increased cell apoptosis. Additional molecular mechanism studies revealed that the expression of p-EGFR was decreased by Ibr-7 alone or in combination with radiation. Overexpression of p-EGFR reversed the cell apoptosis induced by Ibr-7 combined with radiation. Moreover, the expression of γ-H2AX was significantly decreased in the Ibr-7 plus radiation group.

Conclusions

Our study indicated the potential application of Ibr-7 as a highly effective radiosensitizer for the treatment of pancreatic cancer cells.

Background

Pancreatic cancer is a highly invasive and fatal disease, with a low 5-year survival rate of only 5% [1]. Pancreatic cancer is diagnosed in the middle or terminal stage, and 80% of patients are ineligible for surgery. The treatment options for these patients are chemotherapy and radiation therapy [2, 3]. Gemcitabine is the first-line treatment drug for pancreatic cancer. FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) regimens are available for improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Approximately 70% of pancreatic cancer patients receive radiotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy [4, 5]. However, many patients do not benefit from such cytotoxic drugs alone or together with radiotherapy. Pancreatic cancer cells inevitably develop radioresistance, which is one of the main causes of the poor prognosis of patients in clinical treatment [6,7,8]. Exploring new targeted agents to improve the radiosensitivity of pancreatic cancer is critical.

Ibrutinib is a small molecule inhibitor that targets Bruton’s tyrosine kinase [9]. Ibrutinib binds to Cys481 (a cysteine residue), forms a complex with BTK, and inhibits the enzymatic activity of BTK. Targeting BTK restores T cell-dependent antitumour immune responses, inhibiting tumour growth. Ibrutinib exhibited potent antitumour effects against various cancers, including lymphoma and solid tumours (such as non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer) [10,11,12,13,14]. However, our previous research showed that the antitumour effect of ibrutinib was limited to blood cancer cells [15]. The clinical trials of ibrutinib in solid tumours are facing challenges. Based on these findings, we synthesized a series of ibrutinib derivatives, of which Ibr-7 exhibited robust antitumour activity towards NSCLC and pancreatic cancer [15, 16]. In addition, our previous research showed that ibrutinib (10 μmol/L) enhanced the effects of radiation therapy [17]. Therefore, exploring the radiosensitizing effect of Ibr-7 on pancreatic cancer cells is of great interest.

In the present study, evaluated the radiosensitizing effect of Ibr-7 in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Our results suggested that Ibr-7 sensitized the pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC-1 and Capan2 to radiation therapy. Further study indicated that Ibr-7 induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis. Ibr-7 efficiently inhibited p-EGFR expression, similar to that of ibrutinib. However, unlike ibrutinib, Ibr-7 did not suppress the phosphorylation of the AKT/mTOR signalling pathway. These results may offer an effective strategy for enhancing the effect of radiation therapy and will provide insights into the development of ibrutinib derivatives.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and reagents

The human pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC-1 and Capan2 were purchased from the Stem Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). PANC-1 and Capan2 cells were cultured in DMEM or RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Ibrutinib (PCI-32765, 99.2%) was purchased from Selleck, USA. Ibr-7 (Lot: 20161216, > 95%) was provided by Hangzhou Hezheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Ibrutinib and Ibr-7 were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA) at a concentration of 100 mmol/L and stored at − 20 °C.

Antibodies and reagents

Anti-PARP (46D11, 9532, 1:1000), anti-cleaved caspase 3 (CST, D175R, 9661S, 1:1000), anti-caspase 3 (CST, 9662S, 1:1000), anti-EGFR (4267 s, 1:1000), and anti-p-EGFR (Tyr1068; 3777S, 1:1000) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). β-actin (J0914, 1:2000) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). PVDF (0.45 μm, Millipore, Cat. No.: IPVH00010), 5× loading buffer (Biosharp, BL502b), peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L; BL001A) and peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L; BL003A) were purchased from Biosharp. ECL HRP substrates for western blot were purchased from Cyanagen (WESTAR ηC2.0, lot HG13A-CC).

Cell viability assay

Cell proliferation was measured by the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Bestbio, Shanghai, China) assay. Ibrutinib or Ibr-7 was diluted 1:1000 with serum-free medium to a final concentration of 100 μmol/L for the CCK-8 assay. Cells were cultured in 96-well plates at 3–5 × 103/well. Cells were treated with Ibr-7 (1.56–25 μmol/L) or ibrutinib (1.56–50 μmol/L) by the half dilution method for 24, 48 or 72 h. The cells were measured using CCK-8 solutions at 450 nm by a SpectraMax M2e (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Cell viability was calculated for each well, and the 50% growth inhibition concentration (IC50) was determined. Assays were performed on at least three independent experiments.

Clonogenic assay

The pancreatic cancer cells were plated in six-well plates and pretreated with Ibr-7 or DMSO as a control for 24 h. Then, the cells were exposed to the indicated doses (0, 2, 4, and 6 Gy) of radiation. The cells were then incubated with DMEM or RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. After 14 days, the colonies were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich) in absolute methanol for 30 min. Colonies containing more than 50 cells were counted. The survival fraction (SF) was calculated as previously described [18]. SF = mean number of colonies/(plating efficiency × number of cells inoculated) in the treated groups, and the plating efficiency = (mean number of colonies/number of cells inoculated) in the untreated groups. A multitarget click mathematical model was applied to determine the cell survival fraction. We then calculated the sensitization enhancement ratio (SER) as the dose (2 Gy) of radiation divided by the dose (2 Gy) of radiation plus Ibr-7 (SER = SFIR/SFIR + Ibr-7). The mean lethal dose of cells (D0), extrapolation number (N) values, and quasithreshold dose (Dq) were also calculated according to the curve. Error bars were calculated as SDs of the results of three independent experiments.

Cell cycle analysis

PANC-1 and Capan2 cells were divided into four groups: the control group (DMSO), the Ibr-7 (2 μM) group, the radiation (2 Gy) group, and the combination group. A total of 5 × 105 cells were plated into 6-well plates, exposed to Ibr-7 for 24 h, and then exposed to 6-MV of X-ray. After another 24 h, the cells were trypsinized and fixed with precooled 70% ethanol at − 20 °C overnight. Then, PI (supplemented with RNase A) was added to the cells and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The treated cells were analysed by flow cytometry (Becton–Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Error bars were calculated as SDs of the results of three independent experiments.

Apoptosis assay

Cells were divided into four groups as described above. The cells were plated into 6-well plates, pretreated with Ibr-7 for 24 h and exposed to 2 Gy of radiation. After another 24 h, the cells were trypsinized and washed twice with PBS. Then, the cell suspension was stained with 5 μL of Annexin V-FITC and 5 μL of PI solutions and analysed by flow cytometry (Becton–Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Error bars were calculated as SEs of the results of three independent experiments.

Immunofluorescence analysis

A total of 3 × 104 cells were plated on coverslips in 24-well plates and pretreated with DMSO or Ibr-7 for 24 h. Then, the cells were exposed to radiation (6 Gy). The cells were then incubated for 24 h and collected. The cells were washed in PBS 3 times and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. After cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-100 for 15 min, the cells were blocked with 1% BSA and then incubated with anti-γ-H2AX antibody overnight at 4 °C. The cells were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG (FITC-labelled) antibodies (Beyotime) for 60 min, followed by incubation with DAPI for 5 min. Finally, the cells were photographed with an immunofluorescence microscope (Olympus IX53).

Western blot analysis

Cultured cells were collected and washed with PBS three times. Total protein extraction was conducted using RIPA lysis buffer containing phosphatase and protease inhibitors according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 20–40 μg of protein was subjected to 10% SDS/PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were then blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against PARP, cleaved caspase 3, EGFR, p-EGFR and β-actin overnight at 4 °C and then incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed with TBST 3 times, and the proteins were visualized by adding ECL reagent.

Plasmid transfection

The pcDNA3.1-EGFR plasmid, phosphomimic mutant of EGFR plasmid and empty vector were purchased from GenePharma. The plasmid was transfected into PANC-1 and Capan2 cells with jetPRIME reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol as below. Cells are seeded in 6-well plates 24 h prior to transfection. Dilute 2 μg DNA into 200 μL jetPRIME buffer. Mix by vortexing. Add 4 μL jetPRIME, vortex for 10 s, spin down briefly. Incubate for 10 min at RT. Add 200 μL of transfection mix per well drop wise onto the cells in serum containing medium, and distribute evenly. Gently rock the plates back and forth and from side to side. Replace transfection medium after 4 h by cell growth medium and return the plates to the incubator. Analyze after set time.

Statistical analysis

The results were generated from at least three independent experiments. All quantitative values are presented as the mean ± SD (standard deviation). Student’s t test was used to determine the significance, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Graphs were generated using GraphPad software.

Results

Ibr-7 inhibited pancreatic cancer cell growth

Ibr-7 is a synthesized derivative of ibrutinib that exhibited antitumour effects against various cancer cells compared with those of the parental compound (Fig. 1a, b) [15]. To determine the anti-proliferative effect of Ibr-7 in pancreatic cancer cells, both PANC-1 and Capan2 cell lines were treated with increasing doses of ibrutinib or Ibr-7 (1.56–50 μmol/L) for 24 h, 48 h or 72 h, and changes in cell proliferation were examined by CCK-8 assays. Our data demonstrated that cell viability was markedly reduced by Ibr-7 in both dose- and time-dependent manners (Additional file 1: Fig. S1, Additional file 2: Table S1). The IC50 values of Ibr-7 at 48 h of treatment were 1.7 μmol/L and 2.5 μmol/L, while the IC50 values of ibrutinib were 20.8 μmol/L and 29.6 μmol/L for PANC-1 and Capan2, respectively (Fig. 1, Table 1). For both cell lines, the IC50 values of Ibr-7 were approximately one-tenth of the IC50 values of ibrutinib, indicating that Ibr-7 exhibits more effective antitumour activity than ibrutinib.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Ibr-7 showed potent anti-proliferative activity against pancreatic cancer cells in dose-dependent manner. a The chemical structure of ibrutinib (Ibr) and Ibr-7. b CCK8 assay was performed to detect the inhibitory activity of ibrutinib (Ibr) or Ibr-7 on the proliferation on pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1, Capan2 cell lines for 48 h in vitro. Three independent experiments were performed and data were presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation)

Full size image
Table 1 The IC50 of Ibr-7 and ibrutinib in PANC-1 and Capan2 cells
Full size table

Ibr-7 pretreatment enhanced the radiosensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells

Based on the effect of Ibr-7 on pancreatic cancer cells, we further investigated the radiosensitizing effect of Ibr-7 with clonogenic survival assays. Cells were seeded into 6-well plates, treated with 2 μmol/L Ibr-7 and then exposed to IR (2, 4, or 6 Gy). The survival curve was derived from the single-hit multitarget model [\( {\text{Y}} = 1 - \left( {1 - {\text{e}}^{{ - {\text{k*x}}}} } \right)^{\text{N}} \)]. The sensitization enhancement ratio (SER) was measured according to the model. As shown in Fig. 2 and Table 2, pretreatment with Ibr-7 enhanced the radiosensitivity of both PANC-1 (SER = 1.63) and Capan2 cells (SER = 1.59).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Ibr-7 sensitized pancreatic cancer cells to radiation. A representative image of colony formation in PANC-1 and Capan2 cells treated with radiation alone or with Ibr-7 (2 μmol/L) and radiation (0, 2, 4, 6 Gy) (a, b). Clonogenic cell survival assays were performed for PANC-1 and Capan2 cells that were treated with Ibr-7 (2 μmol/L) or DMSO for 24 h, then were exposed to different doses of γ-radiation. A multi-target click mathematical model simulated the cell survival fraction curve (c, d). Results shown are the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. Significance was determined by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05 compared with combination group)

Full size image
Table 2 The radiosensitization activity of PANC-1 and Capan2 cells treated with or without Ibr-7
Full size table

Ibr-7 promoted G2/M cell cycle arrest of pancreatic cancer cells after radiation

To identify whether Ibr-7 could alter radiation-induced cell cycle distribution, PI staining assays of PANC-1 and Capan2 cells were performed. PANC-1 and Capan2 cells were treated with 2 μmol/L Ibr-7 for 24 h and then irradiated with 6 Gy. The cells were collected after 24 h. As shown in Fig. 3, pretreatment with Ibr-7 showed little effect on the G2/M phase (16.12% ± 0.88% vs 8.32% ± 0.48%) in PANC-1 cells compared with that of the controls. The same results were observed in Capan2 cells (11.43% ± 2.07% vs 11.54% ± 1.87%). Cells exposed to radiation alone exhibited G2/M phase arrest compared with that of control cells. Compared with that of the IR group, a significant increase in G2/M accumulation was observed in both PANC-1 (41.93% ± 1.07% vs 27.17% ± 0.04%, *p < 0.05) and Capan2 cells (46.6% ± 3.5% vs 23.92 ± 0.22%, *p < 0.05) in response to the combination treatment. Therefore, Ibr-7 increased radiation-induced G2/M arrest in pancreatic cancer cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ibr-7 promoted radiation-induced G2/M phase arrest in pancreatic cancer cells. a Representative histograms showing the cell cycles of PANC-1 and Capan2 cells in the Ctrl, Ibr-7, radiation and combination groups. Cells were treated with Ibr-7 (2 μmol/L) for 24 h, exposed to 6 Gy of radiation and stained with PI after another 24 h. b The percentages of the cell cycle phases in each group were quantified. The results shown are the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. Significance was determined by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05 compared with the combination group)

Full size image

Ibr-7 increased IR-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells

To further investigate the potential mechanisms by which Ibr-7 enhances radiosensitivity, we next conducted an apoptosis assay by Annexin V-conjugated FITC and propidium iodide (PI) staining. The total apoptosis rate was calculated. The percentage of apoptotic cells in Ibr-7 combined with radiation group (50.2 ± 1.33%) exhibited a markedly increased compared to Ibr-7 (11.67 ± 0.84%) or radiation (25.56 ± 1.07%) alone (Fig. 4a, b, *p < 0.05). In Capan 2 cells, the results were the same (Fig. 4a, c, *p < 0.05). To validate these results, western blot was conducted to measure the expression of apoptosis-related proteins. The expression of PARP was decreased after exposure to Ibr-7 and radiation, while cleaved caspase 3 was increased (Fig. 4d). In summary, these results indicate that Ibr-7 enhances radiation-induced apoptosis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Ibr-7 induced cell apoptosis in irradiated PANC-1 and Capan2 cells. a Representative histograms showing the apoptosis of PANC-1 and Capan2 cells in the Ctrl, Ibr-7, radiation and combination groups. Cells were treated with Ibr-7 (2 μmol/L) for 24 h, exposed to 6 Gy of radiation and stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI after another 24 h. b The percentages of apoptotic cells in each group were quantified. c Cells were pretreated with Ibr-7 for 24 h and then exposed to radiation for another 24 h. Western blot analysis was performed to detect the expression of PARP, Cleaved caspase 3, β-actin was used as a loading control. d The ratio of PARP/β-actin, Cleaved caspase 3/β-actin was quantified by densitometry based on immunoblot images. The results shown are the mean ± SE of 3 independent experiments. Significance was determined by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05 compared with the combination group)

Full size image

Ibr-7 combined with radiation increased DNA damage in pancreatic cancer cells

The major impact of radiation in cells is the induction of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and stimulation of DNA damage repair. Moreover, γ-H2AX is a rapid and sensitive cellular biomarker of DSBs [19]. γ-H2AX (phosphorylated at C-terminal serine residue 139) forms nuclear foci in the regions of nascent DSBs and subsequently undergoes dephosphorylation after the repair of DSBs. Therefore, the number of γ-H2AX foci is used as an indicator of the relative amount of DSBs and repair. To determine whether Ibr-7 could enhance radiation-induced DNA damage, we conducted immunofluorescence analysis to evaluate γ-H2AX foci. As shown in Fig. 5, Ibr-7 significantly increased the number of γ-H2AX foci per cell at 24 h following 6 Gy radiation compared to that of radiation alone (12.0 ± 2.0 compared to 6.67 ± 1.53 in PANC-1 cells and 10.0 ± 1.0 compared to 6.0 ± 1.0 in Capan2 cells, *p < 0.05). These results suggested that the combination of Ibr-7 and radiation increased DNA damage.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Ibr-7 increased radiation induced DNA double-strand breaks. a The representative images of γ-H2AX foci immunofluorescence staining in PANC-1 and Capan2 cells treated with 6 Gy radiation with or without Ibr-7 at 24 h after radiation. b Cells with γ-H2AX foci were counted and quantified. Error bars indicated SE. Significance was determined by Student’s t-test. Scale bar = 10 μm. (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with combination group)

Full size image

Ibr-7 enhanced pancreatic cancer cell radiosensitivity in a p-EGFR-dependent manner

Downregulation of p-EGFR was considered to play a major role in the effect of ibrutinib. We therefore examined whether p-EGFR was the major target of the ibrutinib derivative Ibr-7 in PANC-1 and Capan2 cells after radiation treatment. As expected, the expression of p-EGFR was markedly decreased in response to Ibr-7 alone or in combination with radiation (Fig. 6a, c, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001), indicating the involvement of EGFR in the effect of Ibr-7 combined with radiation on PANC-1 and Capan2 cells.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Involvement of p-EGFR in Ibr-7 sensitive radiation induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. a Cells were pretreated with Ibr-7 for 24 h and then exposed to radiation for another 24 h. Western blot analysis was performed to detect the expression of p-EGFR, EGFR, β-actin was used as a loading control. b Both PANC-1 and Capan2 cells were transfected with phosphomimic mutant of EGFR plasmid and empty vector. Cells were collected after 24 h transfection and the expression of p-EGFR were detected by western blot. c The ratio of p-EGFR/EGFR was quantified by densitometry based on immunoblot images. d The ratio of p-EGFR/β-actin was quantified by densitometry based on immunoblot images. e, f The ratio of apoptosis in PANC-1 and Capan2 cells that had been transfected with phosphomimic mutant of EGFR plasmid or empty vector, then pretreated with Ibr-7 and exposed to radiation. The percentages of cell apoptosis were quantified. Results shown are the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. Significance was determined by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

Based on these results, we further analysed whether the downregulation of p-EGFR was required for apoptosis induced by Ibr-7 plus radiation. We transfected the phosphomimic mutant of EGFR plasmid and measured apoptosis. p-EGFR overexpression significantly decreased apoptosis in PANC-1 (34.10 ± 4.54 compared to 54.03 ± 4.26, **p < 0.01) and Capan2 cells (11.53 ± 1.70 compared to 28.1 ± 4.40, **p < 0.01) in response to the combination treatment (Fig. 6b, d–f). Meanwhile, we also transfected the EGFR plasmid. Similarly, EGFR overexpression significantly decreased apoptosis in PANC-1 (22.00 ± 5.09 compared to 41.30 ± 2.12) and Capan2 cells (12.60 ± 3.96 compared to 29.95 ± 2.47) in response to the combination treatment (Additional file 3: Fig. S2). Taken together, these results suggest that inhibiting p-EGFR might contribute to Ibr-7-induced radiosensitivity.

Discussion

Our findings demonstrate that Ibr-7 strongly enhances the radiosensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells. These effects of Ibr-7 are attributable to activating G2/M arrest and inducing apoptosis, which resulted from the decreases expression of p-EGFR.

Ibrutinib has shown antitumour effects on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia [20,21,22,23]. Ibrutinib also inhibited growth in solid cancers, but the results were limited [24,25,26,27]. Based on these findings, a series of derivatives were developed. Ibr-7 is a promising candidate and exhibits robust antitumour activity against NSCLC and pancreatic cancer [15, 16]. Moreover, ibrutinib (10 μmol/L) was shown to induce radiosensitivity in pancreatic cancer cell lines in our previous study [17]. In the present study, the radiosensitizing effect of Ibr-7 on pancreatic cancer cells was evaluated. The IC50 values of Ibr-7 against PANC-1 and Capan2 cells were 1–2 μmol/L. At a concentration of 2 μmol/L, Ibr-7 robustly induced radiosensitivity in pancreatic cancer cells.

To explore the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the effect of Ibr-7, we first analysed the molecular structure of Ibr-7 and the relationship between ibrutinib and Ibr-7. Due to the similar structure of BTK, ibrutinib forms a complex with BTK and then inhibits BTK activity. The data also showed that ibrutinib inhibits the expression of EGFR, HER2/neu, and Her4/ErbB4. As a derivative of ibrutinib, Ibr-7 could also inhibit EGFR in NSCLC [28]. Whether Ibr-7 can alter the expression of EGFR in pancreatic cancer cells is still unknown. In our study, Ibr-7 inhibited the expression of EGFR in pancreatic cancer cell lines, as we expected. EGFR inhibition could increase radiosensitivity of various tumours. Inhibition of EGFR/HER2 enhances radiosensitivity in pancreatic cancer [29, 30]. Targeting EGFR and the β1 integrin receptor efficiently induced radiosensitization in head and neck cancers. Based on these results, we further investigated the requirement of EGFR in Ibr-7-induced radiosensitivity in pancreatic cancer. Overexpression of EGFR decreased the apoptosis induced by Ibr-7 combined with radiation, which demonstrated the important role of EGFR in Ibr-7-mediated radiosensitization.

The AKT signalling pathway is associated with many tumour processes. Ibrutinib (10 μmol/L) could decrease p-AKT (S473) and its downstream genes, including mTOR and p-p70s6. However, Ibr-7 (2 μmol/L) did not significantly decrease the phosphorylation of AKT, mTOR and p70s6 (data not shown). As a result, the intrinsic mechanism remains to be further elucidated.

Radiation therapy leads to DNA lesions, and DSBs (DNA double strand breaks) are regarded as the major effect of radiation [31]. Radiosensitivity largely depends on the ability to repair radiation-induced DNA damage. γ-H2AX (the phosphorylated form of H2AX), which is induced by radiation, is involved in DNA damage and is closely associated with DSBs, serving as a sensitive and classic cellular indicator of DSBs [32, 33]. The number of γ-H2AX foci indicates the relative amount of DSBs. In our study, we found that Ibr-7 enhanced the number of γ-H2AX foci induced by radiation. In response to DNA damage, cell cycle progression is arrested. Our study found that Ibr-7 prolonged radiation-induced G2/M phase arrest, which was consistent with the higher level of γ-H2AX at 24 h in the Ibr-7 + radiation group than in the radiation-alone group. Based on these results, Ibr-7 may affect the expression of p-EGFR, leading to DNA damage in pancreatic cancer cells in response to radiation.

In conclusion, this study showed that Ibr-7 sensitized pancreatic cancer cells to radiation in vitro and that the effect was likely attributable, at least in part, to the induction of DNA damage, subsequent stimulation of G2/M phase arrest and cell apoptosis resulting from the downregulation of p-EGFR. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence showing Ibr-7-mediated radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer cells. Our preclinical results not only suggest an effective strategy to improve radiosensitivity of pancreatic cancer but also provide meaningful insights into the investigation of Ibr-7 in cancer treatment.

Conclusions

In summary, Ibr-7 enhanced radiation sensitivity in pancreatic cancer cells by promoting cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase, inducing cell apoptosis, and increasing DSBs induced by radiation. The mechanistic investigation revealed that a decrease in p-EGFR played an important role in the radiosensitizing effects of Ibr-7. This study indicates that Ibr-7 may be a novel radiosensitizer for pancreatic cancer.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.

References

  1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, Jemal A, Kramer JL, Siegel RL. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chu LC, Goggins MG, Fishman EK. Diagnosis and detection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer J. 2017;23(6):333–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arasaradnam RP, Wicaksono A, O’Brien H, Kocher HM, Covington JA, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T. Noninvasive diagnosis of pancreatic cancer through detection of volatile organic compounds in urine. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(3):485–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu X, Xiao Y, Hong B, Hao B, Qian Y. Combined detection of CA19-9 and B7-H4 in the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Biomark Sec A Dis Mark. 2019;25(3):251–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou H, Zhu Y, Wei F, Shao Y, Pan J, Wang G, Xu K, Cheng Y. Significance of MUC2 gene methylation detection in pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Pancreatology. 2019;19(8):1049–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seshacharyulu P, Baine MJ, Souchek JJ, Menning M, Kaur S, Yan Y, Ouellette MM, Jain M, Lin C, Batra SK. Biological determinants of radioresistance and their remediation in pancreatic cancer. Biochim et Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2017;1868(1):69–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen AM, Zhou J, Sicairos B, Sonney S, Du Y. Upregulation of CD73 confers acquired radioresistance and is required for maintaining irradiation-selected pancreatic cancer cells in a mesenchymal state. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2020;19(2):375–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang YH, You KY, Bi ZF, Li LT, Mo HQ, Liu YM. The relationship between the radioresistance of pancreatic cancer cell SW1990 and the induction of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition: an in vitro study. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2018;98(12):939–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deeks ED. Ibrutinib: a review in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Drugs. 2017;77(2):225–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao W, Wang M, Wang L, Lu H, Wu S, Dai B, Ou Z, Zhang L, Heymach JV, Gold KA et al. Selective antitumor activity of ibrutinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(9).

  11. Kim ES, Dhillon S. Ibrutinib: a review of its use in patients with mantle cell lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Drugs. 2015;75(7):769–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hershkovitz-Rokah O, Pulver D, Lenz G, Shpilberg O. Ibrutinib resistance in mantle cell lymphoma: clinical, molecular and treatment aspects. Br J Haematol. 2018;181(3):306–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Porto AP, Liu Z, de Beer R, Florquin S, de Boer OJ, Hendriks RW, van der Poll T, de Vos AF. Btk inhibitor ibrutinib reduces inflammatory myeloid cell responses in the lung during murine pneumococcal pneumonia. Mol Med. 2019;25(1):3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Byrd JC, Hillmen P, O’Brien S, Barrientos JC, Reddy NM, Coutre S, Tam CS, Mulligan SP, Jaeger U, Barr PM, et al. Long-term follow-up of the RESONATE phase 3 trial of ibrutinib vs ofatumumab. Blood. 2019;133(19):2031–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang B, Wang L, Zhang Q, Yan Y, Jiang H, Hu R, Zhou X, Liu X, Feng J, Lin N. The Ibr-7 derivative of ibrutinib exhibits enhanced cytotoxicity against non-small cell lung cancer cells via targeting of mTORC1/S6 signaling. Mol Oncol. 2019;13(4):946–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan Youyou ZB, Zhang Q, Zhou D, Lin N. Study on the inhibitory effects and mechanism of new small molecular kinase inhibitors Ibr-7 on human pancreatic cancer Capan-2 cells (in Chinese). China Pharmacy. 2019;30(4):499–506.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tan B, Huang Y, Zhang B, Lin N. The effect of ibrutinib on radiosensitivity in pancreatic cancer cells by targeting EGFR/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;128:110133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin YK, Park JS, Kim HS, Jun HJ, Kim GE, Suh CO, Yun YS, Pyo H. Radiosensitivity enhancement by celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor, via COX-2-dependent cell cycle regulation on human cancer cells expressing differential COX-2 levels. Cancer Res. 2005;65(20):9501–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(10):5858–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Treon SP, Castillo JJ, Skarbnik AP, Soumerai JD, Ghobrial IM, Guerrera ML, Meid K, Yang G. The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib may protect against pulmonary injury in COVID-19-infected patients. Blood. 2020;135(21):1912–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mosna K, Ladicka M, Drgona L, Vranovska M, Hojsikova I, Tomasova R, Danihel L Jr, Kyselovic J, Babal P. Ibrutinib treatment of mantle cell lymphoma complicated by progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;58(6):343–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lucas F, Larkin K, Gregory CT, Orwick S, Doong TJ, Lozanski A, Lozanski G, Misra S, Ngankeu A, Ozer HG, et al. Novel BCL2 mutations in venetoclax-resistant, ibrutinib-resistant CLL patients with BTK/PLCG2 mutations. Blood. 2020;135:2192–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kater AP, Melenhorst JJ. CAR-T and ibrutinib vs CLL: sequential or simultaneous? Blood. 2020;135(19):1611–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Qiu Q, Li C, Song Y, Shi T, Luo X, Zhang H, Hu L, Yan X, Zheng H, Liu M, et al. Targeted delivery of ibrutinib to tumor-associated macrophages by sialic acid-stearic acid conjugate modified nanocomplexes for cancer immunotherapy. Acta Biomater. 2019;92:184–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Prabaharan CB, Yang AB, Chidambaram D, Rajamanickam K, Napper S, Sakharkar MK. Ibrutinib as a potential therapeutic option for HER2 overexpressing breast cancer—the role of STAT3 and p21. Invest New Drugs. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00837-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen J, Kinoshita T, Sukbuntherng J, Chang BY, Elias L. Ibrutinib Inhibits ERBB Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and HER2-Amplified Breast Cancer Cell Growth. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15(12):2835–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hong D, Rasco D, Veeder M, Luke JJ, Chandler J, Balmanoukian A, George TJ, Munster P, Berlin JD, Gutierrez M, et al. A phase 1b/2 study of the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib and the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab in patients with pretreated solid tumors. Oncology. 2019;97(2):102–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei L, Su YK, Lin CM, Chao TY, Huang SP, Huynh TT, Jan HJ, Whang-Peng J, Chiou JF, Wu AT, et al. Preclinical investigation of ibrutinib, a Bruton’s kinase tyrosine (Btk) inhibitor, in suppressing glioma tumorigenesis and stem cell phenotypes. Oncotarget. 2016;7(43):69961–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anakura M, Nachankar A, Kobayashi D, Amornwichet N, Hirota Y, Shibata A, Oike T, Nakano T. Radiosensitivity differences between EGFR mutant and wild-type lung cancer cells are larger at lower doses. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15):3635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Poschau M, Dickreuter E, Singh-Muller J, Zscheppang K, Eke I, Liersch T, Cordes N. EGFR and beta1-integrin targeting differentially affect colorectal carcinoma cell radiosensitivity and invasion. Radiother Oncol. 2015;116(3):510–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature. 2012;481(7381):287–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lobrich M, Shibata A, Beucher A, Fisher A, Ensminger M, Goodarzi AA, Barton O, Jeggo PA. gammaH2AX foci analysis for monitoring DNA double-strand break repair: strengths, limitations and optimization. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(4):662–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Redon CE, Nakamura AJ, Zhang YW, Ji JJ, Bonner WM, Kinders RJ, Parchment RE, Doroshow JH, Pommier Y. Histone gammaH2AX and poly(ADP-ribose) as clinical pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(18):4532–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. LYY18H310010), Hospital Pharmaceutical Research Fund Project of Zhejiang Provincial Pharmaceutical Association (2019ZYY26), Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province (2020E10021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China

    Biqin Tan, Rong Dong, Qingyu Li, Fei Wang & Nengming Lin

  2. Translational Medicine Research Center, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China

    Bo Zhang, Youyou Yan & Nengming Lin

Authors
  1. Biqin Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rong Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Youyou Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qingyu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nengming Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LNM designed the study, prepared, edited and reviewed the manuscript. TBQ, WF and YYY performed experimental studies. DR, ZB, LQY did literature research, gave comments and reviewed the manuscript. TBQ designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nengming Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Ibr-7 and ibrutinib possessed potent anti-proliferative activity against pancreatic cancer cells. The dose- and time- dependent inhibitory effect of Ibr-7 (A, B) and ibrutinib (Ibr) (C, D) on two pancreatic cancer PANC-1 and Capan2 cell lines in vitro. Cells were treated with Ibr or Ibr-7 for 24, 48 or 72 h before CCK-8 assay.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

The IC50 of Ibr-7 in PANC-1 and Capan2 cells.

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

EGFR overexpression decreased cell apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells in response to the combination treatment. (A) Both PANC-1 and Capan2 cells were transfected with EGFR plasmid and empty vector. Cells were collected after 24 h transfection and the expression of p-EGFR, EGFR were detected by western blot. (B) The ratio of EGFR/β-actin was quantified by densitometry based on immunoblot images. (C-D) The ratio of apoptosis in PANC-1 and Capan2 cells that had been transfected with EGFR plasmid or empty vector, then pretreated with Ibr-7 and exposed to radiation. The percentages of cell apoptosis were quantified. Results shown are the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. Significance was determined by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, B., Dong, R., Zhang, B. et al. The Ibr-7 derivative of ibrutinib radiosensitizes pancreatic cancer cells by downregulating p-EGFR. Cancer Cell Int 20, 458 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01548-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01548-6

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us