Skip to main content

MicroRNA regulation of cancer stem cells in the pathogenesis of breast cancer

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and accounts for 30% of all female malignancies worldwide. Breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) are a small population of breast cancer cells that exhibit multiple characteristics including differentiation capacity, self-renewal and therapeutic resistance. Recently, BCSCs have attracted attention due to their modulation of breast tumor behaviors and drug resistance. miRNAs are small noncoding mRNAs involved in virtually all biological processes, including stem cell development, maintenance and differentiation. In breast cancer, miRNAs appear to be multi-faceted since they can act as either suppressors or oncogenes to regulate breast cancer progression. This review summarizes the critical roles of miRNAs in regulating multiple signaling pathways such as Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, BMI-1 and STAT3 that are important for the BCSC maintenance.

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common female cancer in terms of high incidence and mortality rate all over the world. The prevalence of BC is increasing to estimated 42,690 deaths and 279,100 new cases in the United States in 2020 (https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590). In women, BC is the most common type of cancer (25%) and the leading cause of cancer deaths (15%) [1]. High hormonal status, such as estrogen, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2), are the most important factors promoting BC onset and progression. Four distinct breast cancer subtypes have been classified based on the expression of the proliferation marker (Ki67) and the hormonal status including Luminal A, Luminal B (HER2 negative), Luminal B (HER2 positive), HER2 (non-luminal) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [2] (Table 1).

Table 1 The subtypes of breast cancer classified via expression of Ki67 and hormonal status

Many clinical and pathological factors determine the prognosis of BC. In the past decades, a number of cellular factors such as onco-proteins, circulating tumor cells, mutations in some specific genes, microRNAs (miRNAs) and cancer stem cells (CSCs) were proposed to be potential parameters for the prognosis of breast cancers [3]. CSCs in BC tissues lead to uncertainty for breast cancer treatment. CSCs were first detected in human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and they are highly malignant, as they facilitate tumor metastasis, relapse, tumor progression and confer resistance to cancer therapy. Besides the common cancer cell capability such as migration and invasion, these cells exhibit characteristic stem cell properties including differentiation, self-renewal and tumor-initiation [4]. Increasing evidence shows that CSCs are closely associated with the pathogenesis and progression of various cancers, such as pancreatic, colon, prostate, brain and breast cancers. They could confer resistance to therapeutic agents and contribute to the propagation of neoplastic cells for tumor heterogeneity [5]. Somatic and normal stem cells could serve as sources of CSCs under abnormal genetic and epigenetic changes.

miRNAs are small non-coding RNAs with a length of 21–25 nucleotides which are known to regulate more than 60% of human genes at the post-transcriptional level by targeting 3’-untranslated regions (3′‐UTR) of mRNAs for inactivation or degradation. miRNAs play vital roles in multiple biological processes, such as development, cell proliferation and apoptosis. Aberrant expression of miRNAs is closely related with CSC maintenance and tumorigenesis [4]. This review focuses on roles of miRNAs in breast cancer progression, particularly their involvement in Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, BMI-1 and STAT3 pathways in breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs).

Breast cancer stem cells

BCSCs contribute to breast tumor initiation, malignancy and therapeutic resistance. They confer capability in differentiation and self-renewal [6, 7]. Although they only account for approximately 2% breast tumor cells, BCSCs are mainly responsible for metastatic growth, high morbidity and mortality of BC. In addition, BCSCs could result in recurrence and relapse of BC due to their resistance to therapeutic treatments [8]. So far, despite the controversy, it is suggested that BCSCs originate from somatic and normal stem cells [9]. Several BCSC-specific biomarkers including CD44, CD24, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH1) [10], epithelial specific antigen (ESA), CD326 (EpCAM) [11], CD133 [12], CD61 and CD49f [13] have been identified. These biomarkers are vital for BCSC isolation and potentially serve as therapeutic targets for BC treatment.

miRNA regulation of CSCs in breast cancer

As mentioned above, miRNAs play critical roles in CSC differentiation and self-renewal. Emerging evidence suggests that miRNAs are also promising targets and powerful tools for therapeutic treatments of breast cancer via regulation of BCSC differentiation and self-renewal [1]. Here, we dissect and summarize the roles of BCSCs-related miRNAs during breast cancer progression (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

miRNAs act as suppressors or oncomiRs in BCSC maintenance. miRNAs can both act as suppressors (red background) or oncomiRs (green background) to influence BCSC activities independently of known signaling pathways (left panel). On the other hand, some miRNAs can be placed into well-defined signaling pathways (right panel, different color backgrounds) by positively or negatively regulating the characteristics and development of BCSCs such as self-renewal or chemoresistance capacities

miRNAs act as breast cancer suppressors (Table 2)

Table 2 miRNA acts as suppressor in breast cancer

miR-7

miR-7 is expressed poorly in CD24/CD44+/ESA+ BCSCs with potency to metastasize to brain and bone. It represses the brain but not bone metastasis of BCSCs by inversely regulating the expression of pluripotency marker KLF4 [14, 15]. Experiments performed in vitro revealed that miR-7 decreases BCSC’s self-renewal and invasive ability by inhibiting the expression of KLF4 [14]. These results indicate that miR-7 and KLF4 may act as promising therapeutic targets and biomarkers for brain metastasis of BC.

miR-93

miR-93 belongs to the miR106b-25 cluster and may function as a tumor suppressor, although it is frequently overexpressed in various human malignant cancers [16, 17]. Expression of miR-93 downregulates multiple stem cell regulatory genes in BCSCs, including HMGA2, AKT3, EZH1, JAK1, SOX4 and STAT3, and ultimately leads to Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (MET). Mouse xenograft models reveal that ectopic expression of miR-93 completely blocked the metastatic and tumor development abilities of BC. In addition, experiments with different breast cancer cell lines representing various differentiation states and mouse xenograft models reveal that miR-93 expression is lower in most undifferentiated and basal breast cancer cells, and that overexpression of miR-93 increases CSC population and tumor growth in more differentiated luminal breast cancer cells. These results suggest that miR-93 regulates the fate of BCSCs via controlling their differentiation and proliferation states [18].

miR-30

The miR-30 level is decreased in BCSCs, which is accompanied by increased expression of its target genes ITGB3 and UBC9. Furthermore, miR-30 inhibits self-renewal and induces apoptosis of the BCSCs mainly through repressing these two targets. Moreover, a study using a BCSC xenograft mouse model demonstrates that overexpressed miR-30 reduces lung metastasis and tumorigenesis [19]. In addition, miR-30 modulates non-attachment growth and the expression of proliferation and apoptosis related genes in putative BCSCs, and is negatively associated with BC progression [20]. These findings suggest that miR-30 regulates the stemness of BCSCs to repress tumorigenesis and metastasis of BC.

miR-590-5p

miR-590-5p is a potential target for breast cancer therapeutic treatments. It significantly reduces the population of BCSCs. In vivo NOD/SCID nude mice experiments reveal that miR-590-5p significantly inhibits tumorigenicity of BCs [21]. At the molecular level, miR-590-5p is able to repress the expression of a key stemness marker SOX2 and thus inhibits BCSCs’ stemness and metastasis.

miR-140

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an early stage of BC and reducing the incidence of DCIS is the major goal of breast cancer prevention [22]. Volinia et al. found that miR-140 regulates BCSCs in luminal subtype invasive ductal carcinoma [23]. Li et al. demonstrated that loss of miR-140 is a hallmark of DCIS lesions and that miR-140 is significantly downregulated in BCSCs. They also found that restoration of miR-140 could decrease the expression of stem cell marker ALDH1 and SOX9, and reduce basal-like breast tumor growth in vivo [24]. These results suggest that miR-140 is related to maintenance of basal-like DCIS CSCs and deregulated stem cell signaling. Furthermore, miR-140/SOX9/ALDH1 axis is important for basal-like breast tumor formation, BCSCs’ self-renewal and a potential therapy target for basal-like DCIS patients [24].

miR-16

To uncover the biological functions of miR-16 in the progression of breast cancer, Zhang et al. examined its expression in various BCs and BCSCs, and found that miR-16 is significantly downregulated in BCSCs. Moreover, elevated expression of miR-16 inhibits the growth and self-renewal capacity of mouse mammary stem cells by inhibiting its target gene Wip1. More importantly, it confers MCF7 BC cells increased sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin [25].

miR-130-3p

miR-130-3p is downregulated in breast cancer cells and tissues. Overexpression of miR-130-3p in BCSCs inhibits cell proliferation by inducing G0/G1 arrest. Its elevation also represses BC cell migration and invasion by directly downregulating the expression of the oncogene RAB5B [26]. Consistently, miR-130-3p depletion exhibits the opposite effects [26].

miR-4319

Upregulated miR-4319 markedly reduces the stemness and tumorigenicity of stem cells in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) via suppressing the expression of E2F2, a transcription factor vital for stem cell self-renewal, while downregulation of miR-4319 promotes tumorsphere formation and self-renewal in TNBC CSCs and also promotes tumor initiation and metastasis in vivo [27].

miR-519d

miR-519d was found to be downregulated in BCSCs. The experimental expression of miR-519d enhances BCSCs’ sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin through an MCL-1 (an anti-apoptotic protein)-dependent mitochondria pathway [28]. Therefore, miR-519d could serve as a breast tumor suppressor by reducing chemoresistance in BCSCs.

miR-375

The stemness of MCF7 cells can be suppressed by miR-375. miR-375 also inhibited EMT, cell migration and invasion as well as tamoxifen-resistance by degrading its direct target HOXB3 in human ER-positive breast cancers [29], indicating that targeting miR-375 and HOXB3 can be a promising therapeutic method for ER-positive breast cancer patients.

miRNAs act as breast cancer oncogenes (Table 3)

Table 3 miRNA acts as oncomiR in breast cancer

miR-155

miR-155, also known as B-cell integration cluster (BIC), was first identified in B-cell lymphomas [30]. miR-155 is commonly overexpressed in multiple solid malignancies besides breast cancer [31]. Inhibition of miR-155 markedly suppresses the formation of BCSCs by repressing the expression of stem cell markers CD44, CD90 and ABCG2. In addition, inhibition of miR-155 decreases proliferation of breast cancer cells and sensitizes MDA-MB-231 BC cells to the chemotherapeutic drug Doxorubicinol. Taken together, miR-155 may be an oncomiR and a promising therapeutic target of breast cancer; it is also closely associated with sensitivity to chemotherapy and BCSC formation [31, 32].

miR-181

miR-181 has been reported as an oncogenic miRNA. It promotes colony formation, self-renewal capacity and tumor development in breast cancer [5]. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) regulates the sphere-forming stem cell-like feature of BCSCs by upregulating miR-181 and downregulating ATM [33]. TGF-β induces impaired DNA-repair efficiency and synthetic lethality to the inhibition of PARP by downregulating the DNA-repair gene BRCA1 through an miR-181-mediated mechanism in breast cancer. Furthermore, the miR181/BRCA1 axis plays a vital role in primary breast tumor by promoting CSC phenotypes [1, 34].

miR-22

Genetic and epigenetic alterations including altered miRNA expression are largely responsible for distant-organ metastasis of tumor cells. miR-22 promotes breast tumor metastasis via Ten eleven translocation (TET) family-dependent chromatin remodeling of miR-200 and it eventually inhibited miR-200 activity [35]. miR-22 could expand the stem cell compartment and enhance mammary gland side-branching in a mammary gland-specific transgenic mouse model [35].

miR-29a

It was recently reported that miR-29a is increased in breast cancer tissues and BC cells like MCF7 and BCSCs [36]. miR-29a markedly inhibits the expression of SUV420H2, encoding a histone methyltransferase that specifically trimethylates H4K20, via down-regulating histone H4K20 trimethylation and thus promotes BCSC metastatic capacities [36]. Moreover, miR-29a promotes breast cancer EMT via attenuating the repression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and early growth response protein 1 (EGR1) by H4K20 trimethylation [36]. These findings collectively suggest that miR-29a is an oncomiR and is central for breast cancer EMT and metastasis via targeting BCSCs.

miR-9 and miR-221

It has been observed that overexpression of miR-9 and miR-221 dramatically increased BCSCs stemness, migration and invasion via increasing the number of side-population colonies with stem cell-like potency. Consistently, inhibition of miR-9 and miR-221 reduced the proportion and tumor-sphere formation of BCSCs by reducing the expression of the stemness markers Nanog, CD133 and Oct4. Moreover, increased levels of miR-9 and miR-221 in BC are closely related to elevated risk of progression to malignancy, poor differentiation, lymph-node metastasis, reduced survival, late-stage evolution and increased tumor size [37]. Hence, miR-9 and miR-221 have tumorigenic capacity as they promote BCSCs’ properties to yield an invasive phenotype in BC.

miR-203

Upregulated expression of miR-203 was detected both in ER-positive (ER+) BC cell lines and BC tissues. Inhibition of miR-203 represses ER+ breast cancer proliferation, growth and self-renewal capacity of BCSCs by negatively regulating suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) expression [38]. These findings suggest that miR-203 serves as an oncomiR and may be a useful therapeutic target for ER+ BC treatment.

miRNA regulation of CSCs’ signaling pathways in breast cancer

Roles of miRNAs in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is important for CSC maintenance and closely associated with development of different cancers [39, 40]. In the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, there are two scenarios, “Wnt off” and “Wnt on.” “Wnt off” refers to the absence of Wnt ligands, in which the destruction complex, consisting of APC (adenomatous polyposis coli), GSK-3β (glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta), Axin-1 and CK1α (casein kinase 1), is formed. This destruction complex modulates the cytoplasmic β-catenin level by phosphorylating β-catenin and targeting it for proteasomal degradation. “Wnt on” refers to the presence of Wnt ligands, which leads to Dvl (disheveled protein) phosphorylation via Wnt ligands binding to Frizzled/low density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins 5 or 6 (Lrp5/6). Dvl recruits Axin-1 to disrupt the destruction complex and stabilize β-catenin in the cytoplasm, which is translocated to the nucleus and binds to TCF4/LEF family transcription factors or other co-activators to activate target genes [41, 42] (Fig. 2). The Wnt pathway is highly activated in many type of CSCs [43].

Fig. 2
figure2

miRNA-mediated regulation of BCSCs via targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. a “Wnt off”. In the absence of Wnt ligands, the destruction complex (Axin-1, GSK-3β, APC, CX1α) is formed. β-catenin is phosphorylated by the destruction complex, thereby targeting it to be degraded by the β-TrCP-mediated ubiquitin proteasome system. b “Wnt on”. Wnt ligands bind to the Frizzled/Lrp 5/6 receptors, thus leading to Dvl phosphorylation. Phosphorylated Dvl recruits Axin to the membrane, which destroys the destruction complex and prevents the phosphorylation of β-catenin. Thus, β-catenin accumulates in the cytoplasm and finally moves into the nucleus, where it interacts with TCF4/LEF and/or co-activators and promotes the transcription of Wnt target genes. The immediate targets of several miRNAs are marked

It has been reported that some miRNAs regulate BCSC activities via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [44, 45] (Fig. 2), and the majority act as tumor suppressors. For example, FSTL1 (Follistatin Like 1) could increase breast cancer proliferation and stem cell marker expression, and it is closely associated with doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CDP) chemoresistance in breast cancer cells. Moreover, TOP-flash Wnt signaling luciferase activity assays confirmed that FSTL1 activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling through integrin β3 [46]. Furthermore, it was found that miR-137 directly targeted FSTL1 and reduced its mRNA and protein levels. Ultimately, their findings indicated that miR-137 inhibited the BCSCs’ stemness and chemoresistance via inhibiting the Wnt β-catenin signaling pathway by directly downregulating FSTL1 expression [46].

miR-34a has potential to limit BCSC pools, and is critically associated with growth and maintenance of BCSCs and mammary gland stem cells by targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. For instance, miR-34a limits BCSCs self-renewal capacity by inhibiting the expression of several mesenchymal/basal BCSC markers like N-cadherin, vimentin, ITGA6 and keratin 5, and increasing the expression of CD24 (a marker of luminal differentiation) via inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling through inhibiting multiple regulators of this pathway like Fzd1, Fzd2 and Pip5k1α. Thus, it would be an attractive strategy to control breast cancer via eradiation of BCSCs by targeting miR-34a-dependent Wnt/β-catenin signaling [47].

Sun et al. used aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH1) sorting and mammosphere formation assays showed that miRNA Let-7 inhibited self-renewal of BCSCs in estrogen (ER)-positive breast cancer by blocking the ER activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [48]. The results of their current study demonstrated that miRNA Let-7 decreases ratio and the self-renewal ability, contributing to reduced tumor formation capacity of BCSCs, and increased the anticancer functions of tamoxifen by suppressing ER and Wnt/β-catenin signaling [49]. Hence, Let-7 has tumor suppressive functions and could enhance endocrine therapy by modulating the stemness of ER-treated CSCs in breast cancer.

It was reported that overexpressed miR-142-3p is accompanied by decreased expression of stem cell makers CD44, CD133, ALDH1, BRCA2, Bod1 and β-catenin levels in BC. It inhibits mammosphere formation, radiation tolerance and BCSC features of BC cells [50]. Thus, miR-142-3p appears to suppress BCSC characteristics and radioresistance by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

miR-140-5p is commonly considered a tumor suppressor through interaction with stem cell regulators SOX9, SOX2 and Wnt in early stage breast cancer. Consistently, overexpressed miR-140-5p could decrease BCSC populations and inhibit breast cancer progression via suppressing these pathways [51]. Furthermore, miR-140-5p could inhibit BCSC proliferation, tumor-sphere formation and sensitize BCSCs to doxorubicin by downregulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [52].

Overexpression of miR-600 could attenuate BCSCs’ self-renewal ability, decrease tumorigenicity in vivo and promote BCSC differentiation via targeting stearoyl desaturase-1 (SCD1), an enzyme required to produce active, lipid-modified Wnt proteins, by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [53].

It has been demonstrated that miR-31 is upregulated in mammary tumors and mammary stem cells (MaSCs) and can enhance MaSC expansion and mammary epithelial proliferation; knocking out miR-31 inhibited breast tumor growth, decreased BCSC populations, tumor-initiating ability and metastasis to lung by activating Wnt antagonist Dkk1 and eventually suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [54]. To date, miR-31 is the only reported oncomiR in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Roles of miRNAs in the Notch signaling pathway

The Notch signaling is a primordial, evolutionally conserved pathway closely associated with cancer stem cell maintenance [55]. Dysregulation of this pathway occurs frequently in different types of human cancers, including breast cancer [56]. The Notch signaling pathway consists of three components: Notch ligands (DLL1, DLL3, DLL4, Jagged-1 and Jagged-2), Notch receptors (Notch-1, 2, 3 and 4) and the DNA binding sequence CSL. When a Notch ligand on one cell interacts with a Notch receptor on an adjacent cell, it liberates a Notch receptor intracellular domain (NICD), which can be recognized by ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteases) and γ-secretase, respectively. The liberated NICD is translocated into the nucleus and binds to CSL, leading to corresponding transcription of downstream genes [57] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

miRNA-mediated regulation of BCSCs via targeting the Notch signaling pathway. The Notch signaling pathway is activated when Notch ligands on one cell interact with Notch receptors on an adjacent cell, resulting in the two consecutive cleavages of Notch receptors by ADAMs and γ-secretase, and the release of Notch receptor intracellular domain NICD into the cytoplasm. The released NICD is translocated into the nucleus and binds to CSL to initiate the Notch target genes’ expression. The immediate targets of related miRNAs are marked

The Notch signaling regulates the self-renewal of CSCs. Members of the miR-34 family are considered tumor-suppressors and are associated with multiple human cancers. Overexpressed miR-34a reduces BCSC stemness, chemoresistance to doxorubicin and inhibits tumor formation by directly inhibiting Notch1 [58]. Furthermore, miR-34a is reduced in BCSCs. Increased miR-34a expression suppresses the Notch signaling pathway and subsequently inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, chemoresistance to paclitaxel (PTX) and BCSC propagation [59]. Additionally, miR-34c, another miR-34 family member, is downregulated in breast tumor-initiating cells (BT-ICs, also known as BCSCs), while overexpression of miR-34c in BC cells dramatically inhibited EMT, migration and self-renewal of BT-ICs via silencing its target gene Notch4 [60]. Therefore, the miR-34 family (miR-34a/c) could serve as a promising target for prevention and therapy of breast cancer. Similarly, miR-200 family miRNAs are downregulated in BCSCs, and they inhibit BCSCs functions probably through suppressing Notch signaling by targeting Notch pathway components such as JAG1 and the mastermind-like Notch co-activators Maml2 and Maml3 [42].

On the other hand, miR-129 inhibits breast cancer cell’s self-renewal by suppressing Let-7b expression through directly inhibiting Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1). The decreased Let-7b releases its targeted inhibition of NUMB homologue and blocks the Notch oncogenic signaling [61] (Fig. 3).

Roles of miRNAs in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is involved in the function and drug resistance of BCSCs [62]. Dysregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are very common in many types of human cancers, including breast cancer [63]. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K) can be activated by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), integrins, B and T cell receptors, cytokine receptors and GPCRs, leading to phosphatidylinositol 4, 5 bisphosphate (PIP2) to be phosphorylated to phosphatidylinositol 3, 4, 5 trisphosphate (PIP3) and the generation of PIP3 in the plasma membrane. PIP3 then interacts with the PH domain of AKT and recruits AKT to the cell membrane. Next, phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDK1) phosphorylates AKT at the Thr308 residue and activates AKT [64]. PTEN (Phosphatase and tensin homolog) dephosphorylates PIP3 to form PIP2, and is the most important negative regulator of AKT and an antagonist of PI3K. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is not only a downstream member but also an activator of AKT; it can phosphorylate AKT at Ser473, facilitate its Thr308 phosphorylation by PDK1 and fully activate AKT [65] (Fig. 4). Recently, some studies reported that miRNAs regulate cancer progression through this pathway [66, 67] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

miRNA-mediated regulation of BCSCs via targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. AKT is activated by various signals including RTKs, integrins, B and T cell receptors, cytokine receptors and GPCRs through PIP3 produced by PI3Ks. PIP3 interacts with the PH domain of AKT and recruits AKT to the cell membrane, allowing PDK1 to phosphorylate AKT-Thr308. mTOR acts both as a downstream effector and an activator of AKT by phosphorylating AKT-Ser473. Dually-phosphorylated AKT fully activates the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. The immediate targets of miRNAs are marked

miR-99a is found downregulated in a population of breast cancer stem-like cells known as SP cells. miR-99a suppresses SP self-renewal and tumorigenicity in vivo, and migration and invasion in vitro via suppressing the expression of mTOR [68], suggesting that miR-99a directly represses PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling and reverses the phenotypes of BCSCs.

On the other hand, several miRNAs have been found to activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway through targeting PTEN. For example, miR-10b increases expression of stemness and EMT markers and promotes the self-renewal of BCSCs through repressing the transcription of PTEN [69]. Similarly, ectopic expression of miR-221/222 promotes breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, enriched proportion of CD44(+)/CD24(-) BCSCs and improves mammosphere formation capacity via downregulating PTEN [70]. Finally, antagomir-mediated interference of miR-21 activates PTEN expression, and thus reverses EMT, reduces migration and invasion in breast cancer cells, and decreases BCSC self-renewal capacity and clonogenicity [71].

Roles of miRNAs in the BMI-1 signaling pathway

BMI-1 (B lymphoma Mo-MLv insertion region 1 homolog) is a component of the polycomb repression complex 1 (PRC1). It acts as a self-renewal regulator to prevent senescence and apoptosis in normal and CSCs [72]. To support BMI-1-mediated self-renewal, PRC1 suppresses the Ink4a locus that encodes p16Ink4a and p19Arf genes by trimethylation of H3-K27 (H3K27me3) and ubiquitination of H2A-K119 (H2AK119Ub). Moreover, p16Ink4a and p19Arf are regulators of immortalization and senescence. Deletion and mutations of these two genes are frequently found in human cancers. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP16 suppresses self-renewal and senescence pathways in multiple tissues via deubiquitinating H2AK119 and increasing Ink4a locus transcription [73], while BMI-1 regulates cell cycle, apoptosis and senescence via inhibiting p16Ink4a and p19Arf genes encoded by Ink4a [74, 75]. BMI-1 is found to be upregulated in various human BC cells and is essential for self-renewal of BCSCs via suppressing genes involved in apoptosis and senescence [76] (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure5

miRNA-mediated regulation of the BCSCs via targeting the BMI-1 signaling pathway. a To support self-renewal of stem cells by BMI-1 (a component of PRC1), PRC1 suppresses the expression of the Ink4a locus that encodes the p16Ink4a and the p19Arf genes by trimethylation of H3-K27 (H3K27me3) and ubiquitination of H2A-K119 (H2AK119Ub). The chromodomain of CBX binds to H3K27me3 and RING1 deposits monoubiquitin on H2AK119. b p16Ink4a inhibits the phosphorylation of RB by the cyclin D/Cdk4/6 complex and E2F-dependent transcription of RB that finally inhibit cell cycle progression. p19Arf causes high levels of p53 via preventing MDM2-mediated p53 degradation, which represses cell cycle progression and promotes apoptosis. The immediate targets of miRNAs are marked

The expression of BMI-1 is modulated by some miRNAs in human cancers [77,78,79] (Fig. 5). For instance, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-183 and miR-141 are dramatically downregulated in normal mammary stem cells and BCSCs, suggesting that the miR-200 family members play vital roles in regulating the self-renewal of BCSCs and normal mammary stem cells. Via downregulating BMI-1, miR-200c inhibits BC cell growth, induces cell differentiation and suppresses tumor formation in vivo. More importantly, it strongly suppresses the ability of normal mammary stem cells to form mammary ducts and suppresses tumor formation driven by human BCSCs in vivo [80, 81].

On the other hand, ectopic expression of miR-128 in BCSCs suppresses breast cancer progression and induces apoptosis by downregulating BMI-1 and ABCC5 expression [82]. In addition, the tropolone-related compound Hinokitiol is known to have an anti-cancer effect [83, 84]. It was found that Hinokitiol upregulates miR-494-3p to repress self-renewal of BCSCs via inhibiting BMI-1 expression [85].

Roles of miRNAs in the STAT3 signaling pathway

Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3) is not only a transcription factor that plays a vital role in the biology of transformed and normal cells but also an important regulator of normal and BCSCs. It has six functional domains, including an N-terminal domain (NTD), a coiled coil domain (CCD) that mediates protein-protein interactions, a DNA-binding domain (DBD), a linker domain (LD), an SH2 (SRC homology 2) domain and a C-terminal transcription activation domain (TAD). It also has two important phosphorylation sites: Tyr705 within the SH2 domain, and Ser727 within TAD [86, 87]. STAT3 is mainly activated by phosphorylation of the conserved Tyr705 residue, which leads to its dimerization [88]. The activated STAT3 dimers interact with importins, translocate into the nucleus and activate target genes by binding to their GAS (interferon-γ-activated sequence) motifs [86, 89,90,91] (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure6

miRNA-mediated regulation of BCSCs via targeting the STAT3 signaling pathway. a STAT3 has six functional domains and two phosphorylation sites, as indicated. b STAT3 is mainly activated by Tyr705 phosphorylation within the SH2 domain, which leads to its dimerization. Activated STAT3 dimers interact with importins, translocate into the nucleus and activate target gene transcription by binding to the GAS motif of target genes. The immediate targets of miRNAs are marked

Several studies revealed that miRNAs are critical regulators of STAT3 in many types of human cancers [92] (Fig. 6). For instance, miR-7 inhibits metastasis and population growth, reverses EMT of BCSCs via directly suppressing oncogene SETDB1. Since SETDB1 transcriptionally activates the expression of STAT3, miR-7-mediated SETDB1 repression downregulates the STAT3 signaling pathway [93]. miR-205 is thought to be not only a tumor suppressor but also an oncomiR in breast cancer [94]. As a suppressor, ectopic expression of miR-205 inhibits cell anchorage-independent growth and proliferation by repressing expression of ErbB3, which is a component of the most potent oncogenic complex ErbB2/ErbB3 heterodimer in breast cancer [95]. Moreover, miR-205 inhibits breast cancer invasion by directly targeting the key angiogenesis regulator VEGF-A [95]. As an oncomiR, miR-205 promotes the colony-forming potential of mammary epithelial cells and leads to an expansion of the progenitor-cell population by targeting the tumor suppressor gene phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) [96]. It also has been shown to play an important role in the maintenance of BCSCs via inhibiting CSC self-renewal capacity and suppressing expression of stem cell markers CD44, ALDH1, TAZ and E2Q-E12, most likely through regulating STAT3 signaling [97].

Conclusion and future perspective

It is now well-established that breast cancer harbors a small population of BCSCs, which are considered major oncogenic driving cells, as they facilitate breast tumor metastasis, relapse, progression and confer breast cancer therapy resistance by bestowing abilities such as migration, invasion, sphere formation, pluripotency, low-proliferation rate, self-renewal and tumor-initiation [4]. Hence, they play important roles in the resistance to therapeutic agents and the development of tumor heterogeneity by contributing to the propagation of neoplastic cells.

Although multiple mechanisms have been associated with stemness maintenance and BCSC functions attributed to the oncogenic potential, there are still unanswered questions calling for further investigation. Recent development in breast cancer research has revealed that miRNAs are promising therapeutic targets for breast cancer via their driving oncogenic potential and therapeutic hindrance due to BCSCs. Indeed, they are deregulated in various pathological conditions including CSCs during cancer progression.

In this review, we summarized recent advances for the roles of various miRNAs in a few BCSC-related signaling pathways important for maintenance of CSCs during breast cancer progression. Hence, targeting miRNAs is central for the elimination of BCSCs and breast cancer recurrence, therapeutic resistance and metastasis as miRNAs play regulatory roles in various characteristics of BCSCs.

In the future, therapeutic potentials could be further explored in breast cancer cells expressing an aberrant level of miRNAs. Several miRNA-based analogs and antagonists are currently being investigated and under clinical trials. For example, MRX34 (Mirna Therapeutics, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) is a liposomal product designed to deliver an analog of the naturally occurring tumor suppressor miR-34 [98], whereas most miRNAs are still explored at subclinical animal experimental levels and their therapeutics are still in infancy. Taken together, remarkable development and efforts are needed to bring the miRNA-based therapy from labs to the clinic.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Yousefnia S, Seyed Forootan F, Seyed Forootan S, Nasr Esfahani MH, Gure AO, Ghaedi K. Mechanistic pathways of malignancy in breast cancer stem cells. Front Oncol. 2020;10:452.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gao JJ, Swain SM. Luminal A breast cancer and molecular assays: a review. Oncologist. 2018;23(5):556–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dong H, Diao H, Zhao Y, Xu H, Pei S, Gao J, Wang J, Hussain T, Zhao D, Zhou X, et al. Overexpression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in breast cancer cell lines remarkably increases the cell malignancy largely via activation of transforming growth factor beta/SMAD signalling. Cell Proliferation. 2019;52(5):e12633.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Asadzadeh Z, Mansoori B, Mohammadi A, Aghajani M, Haji-Asgarzadeh K, Safarzadeh E, Mokhtarzadeh A, Duijf PHG, Baradaran B. microRNAs in cancer stem cells: biology, pathways, and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(7):10002–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Khan AQ, Ahmed EI, Elareer NR, Junejo K, Steinhoff M, Uddin S. Role of miRNA-regulated cancer stem cells in the pathogenesis of human malignancies. Cells. 2019;8(8):840.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mathieu J, Ruohola-Baker H. Regulation of stem cell populations by microRNAs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;786:329–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Morel AP, Lièvre M, Thomas C, Hinkal G, Ansieau S, Puisieux A. Generation of breast cancer stem cells through epithelial–mesenchymal transition. PloS One. 2008;3(8):e2888.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lin CY, Barry-Holson KQ, Allison KH. Breast cancer stem cells: are we ready to go from bench to bedside? Histopathology. 2016;68(1):119–37.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sin WC, Lim CL. Breast cancer stem cells-from origins to targeted therapy. Stem Cell Investig. 2017;4:96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    de Beça FF, Caetano P, Gerhard R, Alvarenga CA, Gomes M, Paredes J, Schmitt F. Cancer stem cells markers CD44, CD24 and ALDH1 in breast cancer special histological types. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(3):187–91.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Baeuerle PA, Gires O. EpCAM (CD326) finding its role in cancer. Br J cancer. 2007;96(3):417–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu TJ, Sun BC, Zhao XL, Zhao XM, Sun T, Gu Q, Yao Z, Dong XY, Zhao N, Liu N. CD133 + cells with cancer stem cell characteristics associates with vasculogenic mimicry in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32(5):544–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lo PK, Kanojia D, Liu X, Singh UP, Berger FG, Wang Q, Chen H. CD49f and CD61 identify Her2/neu-induced mammary tumor-initiating cells that are potentially derived from luminal progenitors and maintained by the integrin-TGFbeta signaling. Oncogene. 2012;31(21):2614–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Okuda H, Xing F, Pandey PR, Sharma S, Watabe M, Pai SK, Mo YY, Iiizumi-Gairani M, Hirota S, Liu Y, et al. miR-7 suppresses brain metastasis of breast cancer stem-like cells by modulating KLF4. Cancer Res. 2013;73(4):1434–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    van Schaijik B, Davis PF, Wickremesekera AC, Tan ST, Itinteang T. Subcellular localisation of the stem cell markers OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, KLF4 and c-MYC in cancer: a review. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71(1):88–91.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ibarra I, Erlich Y, Muthuswamy SK, Sachidanandam R, Hannon GJ. A role for microRNAs in maintenance of mouse mammary epithelial progenitor cells. Genes Dev. 2007;21(24):3238–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Petrocca F, Vecchione A, Croce CM. Emerging role of miR-106b-25/miR-17-92 clusters in the control of transforming growth factor beta signaling. Cancer Res. 2008;68(20):8191–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Liu S, Patel SH, Ginestier C, Ibarra I, Martin-Trevino R, Bai S, McDermott SP, Shang L, Ke J, Ou SJ, et al. MicroRNA93 regulates proliferation and differentiation of normal and malignant breast stem cells. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(6):e1002751.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yu F, Deng H, Yao H, Liu Q, Su F, Song E. Mir-30 reduction maintains self-renewal and inhibits apoptosis in breast tumor-initiating cells. Oncogene. 2010;29(29):4194–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ouzounova M, Vuong T, Ancey PB, Ferrand M, Durand G, Le-Calvez Kelm F, Croce C, Matar C, Herceg Z, Hernandez-Vargas H. MicroRNA miR-30 family regulates non-attachment growth of breast cancer cells. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:139.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhou L, Zhao LC, Jiang N, Wang XL, Zhou XN, Luo XL, Ren J. MicroRNA miR-590-5p inhibits breast cancer cell stemness and metastasis by targeting SOX2. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(1):87–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Leonard GD, Swain SM. Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(12):906–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Volinia S, Galasso M, Sana ME, Wise TF, Palatini J, Huebner K, Croce CM. Breast cancer signatures for invasiveness and prognosis defined by deep sequencing of microRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(8):3024–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li Q, Yao Y, Eades G, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Zhou Q. Downregulation of miR-140 promotes cancer stem cell formation in basal-like early stage breast cancer. Oncogene. 2014;33(20):2589–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang X, Wan G, Mlotshwa S, Vance V, Berger FG, Chen H, Lu X. Oncogenic Wip1 phosphatase is inhibited by miR-16 in the DNA damage signaling pathway. Cancer Res. 2010;70(18):7176–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kong X, Zhang J, Li J, Shao J, Fang L. MiR-130a-3p inhibits migration and invasion by regulating RAB5B in human breast cancer stem cell-like cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;501(2):486–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chu J, Li Y, Fan X, Ma J, Li J, Lu G, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Li W, Huang X, et al. MiR-4319 suppress the malignancy of triple-negative breast cancer by regulating self-renewal and tumorigenesis of stem cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48(2):593–604.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Xie Q, Wang S, Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Qin C, Yang X. MiR-519d impedes cisplatin-resistance in breast cancer stem cells by down-regulating the expression of MCL-1. Oncotarget. 2017;8(13):22003–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fu H, Fu L, Xie C, Zuo WS, Liu YS, Zheng MZ, Yu JM. miR-375 inhibits cancer stem cell phenotype and tamoxifen resistance by degrading HOXB3 in human ER-positive breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2017;37(2):1093–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Le Quesne J, Caldas C. Micro-RNAs and breast cancer. Molecular Oncol. 2010;4(3):230–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jiang S, Zhang HW, Lu MH, He XH, Li Y, Gu H, Liu MF, Wang ED. MicroRNA-155 functions as an OncomiR in breast cancer by targeting the suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 gene. Cancer research. 2010;70(8):3119–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zuo J, Yu Y, Zhu M, Jing W, Yu M, Chai H, Liang C, Tu J. Inhibition of miR-155, a therapeutic target for breast cancer, prevented in cancer stem cell formation. Cancer Biomark A. 2018;21(2):383–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang Y, Yu Y, Tsuyada A, Ren X, Wu X, Stubblefield K, Rankin-Gee EK, Wang SE. Transforming growth factor-beta regulates the sphere-initiating stem cell-like feature in breast cancer through miRNA-181 and ATM. Oncogene. 2011;30(12):1470–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Liu L, Zhou W, Cheng CT, Ren X, Somlo G, Fong MY, Chin AR, Li H, Yu Y, Xu Y, et al. TGFβ induces “BRCAness” and sensitivity to PARP inhibition in breast cancer by regulating DNA-repair genes. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12(11):1597–609.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Song SJ, Poliseno L, Song MS, Ala U, Webster K, Ng C, Beringer G, Brikbak NJ, Yuan X, Cantley LC, et al. MicroRNA-antagonism regulates breast cancer stemness and metastasis via TET-family-dependent chromatin remodeling. Cell. 2013;154(2):311–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wu Y, Shi W, Tang T, Wang Y, Yin X, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Xing Y, Shen Y, Xia T, et al. miR-29a contributes to breast cancer cells epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration, and invasion via down-regulating histone H4K20 trimethylation through directly targeting SUV420H2. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(3):176.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cheng CW, Yu JC, Hsieh YH, Liao WL, Shieh JC, Yao CC, Lee HJ, Chen PM, Wu PE, Shen CY. Increased cellular levels of microRNA-9 and microRNA-221 correlate with cancer stemness and predict poor outcome in human breast cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48(5):2205–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Muhammad N, Bhattacharya S, Steele R, Ray RB. Anti-miR-203 suppresses ER-positive breast cancer growth and stemness by targeting SOCS3. Oncotarget. 2016;7(36):58595–605.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Duchartre Y, Kim YM, Kahn M. The Wnt signaling pathway in cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;99:141–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jang GB, Kim JY, Cho SD, Park KS, Jung JY, Lee HY, Hong IS, Nam JS. Blockade of Wnt/β-catenin signaling suppresses breast cancer metastasis by inhibiting CSC-like phenotype. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12465.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vallée A, Lecarpentier Y, Vallée JN. Targeting the canonical WNT/β-catenin pathway in cancer treatment using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cells. 2019;8(7):726.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang Y, Xu B, Zhang XP. Effects of miRNAs on functions of breast cancer stem cells and treatment of breast cancer. OncoTargets therapy. 2018;11:4263–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Katoh M, Katoh M. WNT signaling pathway and stem cell signaling network. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(14):4042–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Huang K, Zhang JX, Han L, You YP, Jiang T, Pu PY, Kang CS. MicroRNA roles in beta-catenin pathway. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:252.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Xing F, Wu K, Watabe K. MicroRNAs in cancer stem cells: new regulators of stemness. Curr Pharm Design. 2014;20(33):5319–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Cheng S, Huang Y, Lou C, He Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Q. FSTL1 enhances chemoresistance and maintains stemness in breast cancer cells via integrin beta3/Wnt signaling under miR-137 regulation. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(3):328–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bonetti P, Climent M, Panebianco F, Tordonato C, Santoro A, Marzi MJ, Pelicci PG, Ventura A, Nicassio F. Dual role for miR-34a in the control of early progenitor proliferation and commitment in the mammary gland and in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38(3):360–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sun X, Xu C, Tang SC, Wang J, Wang H, Wang P, Du N, Qin S, Li G, Xu S, et al. Let-7c blocks estrogen-activated Wnt signaling in induction of self-renewal of breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016;23(4):83–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sun X, Xu C, Xiao G, Meng J, Wang J, Tang SC, Qin S, Du N, Li G, Ren H, et al. Breast cancer stem-like cells are sensitized to tamoxifen induction of self-renewal inhibition with enforced Let-7c dependent on Wnt blocking. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41(4):1967–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Troschel FM, Böhly N, Borrmann K, Braun T, Schwickert A, Kiesel L, Eich HT, Götte M, Greve B. miR-142-3p attenuates breast cancer stem cell characteristics and decreases radioresistance in vitro. Tumour Biol. 2018;40(8):1010428318791887.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wolfson B, Eades G, Zhou Q. Roles of microRNA-140 in stem cell-associated early stage breast cancer. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6(5):591–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wu D, Zhang J, Lu Y, Bo S, Li L, Wang L, Zhang Q, Mao J. miR-140-5p inhibits the proliferation and enhances the efficacy of doxorubicin to breast cancer stem cells by targeting Wnt1. Cancer Gene Ther. 2019;26(3–4):74–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    El Helou R, Pinna G, Cabaud O, Wicinski J, Bhajun R, Guyon L, Rioualen C, Finetti P, Gros A, Mari B, et al. miR-600 acts as a bimodal switch that regulates breast cancer stem cell fate through WNT signaling. Cell Rep. 2017;18(9):2256–68.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lv C, Li F, Li X, Tian Y, Zhang Y, Sheng X, Song Y, Meng Q, Yuan S, Luan L, et al. MiR-31 promotes mammary stem cell expansion and breast tumorigenesis by suppressing Wnt signaling antagonists. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1036.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Takebe N, Miele L, Harris PJ, Jeong W, Bando H, Kahn M, Yang SX, Ivy SP. Targeting Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways in cancer stem cells: clinical update. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12(8):445–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Braune EB, Seshire A, Lendahl U. Notch and Wnt dysregulation and its relevance for breast cancer and tumor initiation. Biomedicines. 2018;6(4):101.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Li L, Tang P, Li S, Qin X, Yang H, Wu C, Liu Y. Notch signaling pathway networks in cancer metastasis: a new target for cancer therapy. Med Oncol (Northwood Lond Engl). 2017;34(10):180.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Park EY, Chang E, Lee EJ, Lee HW, Kang HG, Chun KH, Woo YM, Kong HK, Ko JY, Suzuki H, et al. Targeting of miR34a-NOTCH1 axis reduced breast cancer stemness and chemoresistance. Cancer Res. 2014;74(24):7573–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kang L, Mao J, Tao Y, Song B, Ma W, Lu Y, Zhao L, Li J, Yang B, Li L. MicroRNA-34a suppresses the breast cancer stem cell-like characteristics by downregulating Notch1 pathway. Cancer Sci. 2015;106(6):700–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Yu F, Jiao Y, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Zhu J, Cui X, Liu Y, He Y, Park EY, Zhang H, et al. MicroRNA 34c gene down-regulation via DNA methylation promotes self-renewal and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast tumor-initiating cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(1):465–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Xiao G, Li X, Li G, Zhang B, Xu C, Qin S, Du N, Wang J, Tang SC, Zhang J, et al. MiR-129 blocks estrogen induction of NOTCH signaling activity in breast cancer stem-like cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(61):103261–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hu Y, Guo R, Wei J, Zhou Y, Ji W, Liu J, Zhi X, Zhang J. Effects of PI3K inhibitor NVP-BKM120 on overcoming drug resistance and eliminating cancer stem cells in human breast cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6(12):e2020.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Guerrero-Zotano A, Mayer IA, Arteaga CL. PI3K/AKT/mTOR: role in breast cancer progression, drug resistance, and treatment. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(4):515–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Nitulescu GM, Van De Venter M, Nitulescu G, Ungurianu A, Juzenas P, Peng Q, Olaru OT, Grădinaru D, Tsatsakis A, Tsoukalas D, et al. The Akt pathway in oncology therapy and beyond (Review). Int J Oncol. 2018;53(6):2319–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Sarbassov DD, Guertin DA, Ali SM, Sabatini DM. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science. 2005;307(5712):1098–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Hu M, Zhu S, Xiong S, Xue X, Zhou X. MicroRNAs and the PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway in gastric cancer (Review). Oncol Rep. 2019;41(3):1439–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Li YJ, Li XF, Yang EH, Shi M. Reserch advances on the role of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and MiRNA in acute T-cell lymphocytic leukemia - review. Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi. 2019;27(4):1344–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Yang Z, Han Y, Cheng K, Zhang G, Wang X. miR-99a directly targets the mTOR signalling pathway in breast cancer side population cells. Cell Proliferation. 2014;47(6):587–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bahena-Ocampo I, Espinosa M, Ceballos-Cancino G, Lizarraga F, Campos-Arroyo D, Schwarz A, Maldonado V, Melendez-Zajgla J, Garcia-Lopez P. miR-10b expression in breast cancer stem cells supports self-renewal through negative PTEN regulation and sustained AKT activation. EMBO Rep. 2016;17(5):648–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Li B, Lu Y, Wang H, Han X, Mao J, Li J, Yu L, Wang B, Fan S, Yu X, et al. miR-221/222 enhance the tumorigenicity of human breast cancer stem cells via modulation of PTEN/Akt pathway. Biomedicine pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine pharmacotherapie. 2016;79:93–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Han M, Liu M, Wang Y, Chen X, Xu J, Sun Y, Zhao L, Qu H, Fan Y, Wu C. Antagonism of miR-21 reverses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell phenotype through AKT/ERK1/2 inactivation by targeting PTEN. PloS One. 2012;7(6):e39520.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Pietersen AM, Evers B, Prasad AA, Tanger E, Cornelissen-Steijger P, Jonkers J, van Lohuizen M. Bmi1 regulates stem cells and proliferation and differentiation of committed cells in mammary epithelium. Current biology: CB. 2008;18(14):1094–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Adorno M, Sikandar S, Mitra SS, Kuo A, Nicolis Di Robilant B, Haro-Acosta V, Ouadah Y, Quarta M, Rodriguez J, Qian D, et al. Usp16 contributes to somatic stem-cell defects in Down’s syndrome. Nature. 2013;501(7467):380–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Park IK, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Bmi1, stem cells, and senescence regulation. J Clin Investig. 2004;113(2):175–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Sharpless NE, DePinho RA. The INK4A/ARF locus and its two gene products. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999;9(1):22–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Lee YC, Chang WW, Chen YY, Tsai YH, Chou YH, Tseng HC, Chen HL, Wu CC, Chang-Chien J, Lee HT, et al. Hsp90α mediates BMI1 expression in breast cancer stem/progenitor cells through facilitating nuclear translocation of c-Myc and EZH2. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(9):1986.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Dimri M, Carroll JD, Cho JH, Dimri GP. microRNA-141 regulates BMI1 expression and induces senescence in human diploid fibroblasts. Cell cycle (Georgetown Tex). 2013;12(22):3537–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Dong P, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Hamada J, Sudo S, Ju J, Sakuragi N. MicroRNA-194 inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition of endometrial cancer cells by targeting oncogene BMI-1. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    He X, Dong Y, Wu CW, Zhao Z, Ng SS, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Yu J. MicroRNA-218 inhibits cell cycle progression and promotes apoptosis in colon cancer by downregulating BMI1 polycomb ring finger oncogene. Molecular medicine (Cambridge Mass). 2013;18(1):1491–8.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Shimono Y, Mukohyama J, Nakamura S, Minami H. MicroRNA regulation of human breast cancer stem cells. J Clin Med. 2015;5(1):2.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Shimono Y, Zabala M, Cho RW, Lobo N, Dalerba P, Qian D, Diehn M, Liu H, Panula SP, Chiao E, et al. Downregulation of miRNA-200c links breast cancer stem cells with normal stem cells. Cell. 2009;138(3):592–603.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Zhu Y, Yu F, Jiao Y, Feng J, Tang W, Yao H, Gong C, Chen J, Su F, Zhang Y, et al. Reduced miR-128 in breast tumor-initiating cells induces chemotherapeutic resistance via Bmi-1 and ABCC5. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(22):7105–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Lee YS, Choi KM, Kim W, Jeon YS, Lee YM, Hong JT, Yun YP, Yoo HS. Hinokitiol inhibits cell growth through induction of S-phase arrest and apoptosis in human colon cancer cells and suppresses tumor growth in a mouse xenograft experiment. J Natural Products. 2013;76(12):2195–202.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Liu S, Yamauchi H. p27-Associated G1 arrest induced by hinokitiol in human malignant melanoma cells is mediated via down-regulation of pRb, Skp2 ubiquitin ligase, and impairment of Cdk2 function. Cancer Lett. 2009;286(2):240–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Chen SM, Wang BY, Lee CH, Lee HT, Li JJ, Hong GC, Hung YC, Chien PJ, Chang CY, Hsu LS, et al. Hinokitiol up-regulates miR-494-3p to suppress BMI1 expression and inhibits self-renewal of breast cancer stem/progenitor cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(44):76057–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Galoczova M, Coates P, Vojtesek B. STAT3, stem cells, cancer stem cells and p63. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2018;23:12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    You L, Wang Z, Li H, Shou J, Jing Z, Xie J, Sui X, Pan H, Han W. The role of STAT3 in autophagy. Autophagy. 2015;11(5):729–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Levy DE, Darnell JE Jr. Stats: transcriptional control and biological impact. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3(9):651–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Darnell JE Jr, Kerr IM, Stark GR. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science. 1994;264(5164):1415–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Fagard R, Metelev V, Souissi I, Baran-Marszak F. STAT3 inhibitors for cancer therapy: Have all roads been explored? Jak-stat. 2013;2(1):e22882.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Zhong Z, Wen Z, Darnell JE. Jr.: Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science. 1994;264(5155):95–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Yu H, Lee H, Herrmann A, Buettner R, Jove R. Revisiting STAT3 signalling in cancer: new and unexpected biological functions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(11):736–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Zhang H, Cai K, Wang J, Wang X, Cheng K, Shi F, Jiang L, Zhang Y, Dou J. MiR-7, inhibited indirectly by lincRNA HOTAIR, directly inhibits SETDB1 and reverses the EMT of breast cancer stem cells by downregulating the STAT3 pathway. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio). 2014;32(11):2858–68.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Qin AY, Zhang XW, Liu L, Yu JP, Li H, Wang SZ, Ren XB, Cao S. MiR-205 in cancer: an angel or a devil? Eur J Cell Biol. 2013;92(2):54–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Wu H, Zhu S, Mo YY. Suppression of cell growth and invasion by miR-205 in breast cancer. Cell Res. 2009;19(4):439–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Greene SB, Gunaratne PH, Hammond SM, Rosen JM. A putative role for microRNA-205 in mammary epithelial cell progenitors. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 4):606–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Mayoral-Varo V, Calcabrini A, Sánchez-Bailón MP, Martín-Pérez J. miR205 inhibits stem cell renewal in SUM159PT breast cancer cells. PloS one. 2017;12(11):e0188637.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Zhang Y, Wang Z, Gemeinhart RA. Progress in microRNA delivery. J Controlled Release. 2013;172(3):962–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Michelle Hanna for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China operating grant 81872003 to WZ and the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation research grant C7022 to WX.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TN made literature search and drafted the manuscript of this review. WX supervised the work and revised the manuscript. WX and WZ edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree with the final version of the manuscript and give their consent for its publication.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, T., Zhang, W. & Xiao, W. MicroRNA regulation of cancer stem cells in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int 21, 31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01716-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Breast cancer stem cell (BCSC)
  • miRNA
  • Self-renewal
  • Therapeutic resistance