Skip to main content
Download PDF

ROS impairs tumor vasculature normalization through an endocytosis effect of caveolae on extracellular SPARC

Cancer Cell International volume 23, Article number: 152 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in tumor microenvironment (TME) is an important player for tumorigenesis and progression. We aimed to explore the outcomes of ROS on tumor vessels and the potential regulated mechanisms.

Methods

Exogenous H2O2 was adopted to simulate the ROS setting. Immunofluorescence staining and ultrasonography were used to assess the vascular endothelial coverage and perfusions in the tumors inoculated with Lewis lung cancer (LLC) and melanoma (B16F10) cells of C57BL/6 mice, respectively. ELISA and western-blot were used to detect the expression of secreted acidic and cysteine-rich protein (SPARC) and Caveale-1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) extra- and intracellularly. Intracellular translocation of SPARC was observed using electron microscopy and immunofluorescence approaches.

Result

Under the context of oxidative stress, the pericyte recruitment of neovascularization in mouse lung cancer and melanoma tissues would be aberrated, which subsequently led to the disruption of the tumor vascular architecture and perfusion dysfunction. In vitro, HUVEC extracellularly SPARC was down-regulated, whereas intracellularly it was up-regulated. By electron microscopy and immunofluorescence staining, we observed that SPARC might undergo transmembrane transport via caveale-1-mediated endocytosis. Finally, the binding of SPARC to phosphorylated-caveale-1 was also detected in B16F10 tissues.

Conclusion

In the oxidative stress environment, neovascularization within the tumor occurs structural deterioration and decreased perfusion capacity. One of the main regulatory mechanisms is the migration of extracellular SPARC from the endothelium to intracellular compartments via Caveolin-1 carriers.

Background

Carcinogenesis requires a complex microenvironment. Unlike the normal context, the tumor microenvironment (TME) is often accompanied by significant adverse elements that can easily trigger tumor cells to resist drugs or irradiation and subsequently elicit recurrence or metastasis [1,2,3,4,5]. Blocking detrimental components in TME, therefore, may mitigate their therapeutic resistance.

Aberrant angiogenesis is an important feature of the TME. It has been demonstrated in multiple tumor models that tumor parenchymal cells, as well as the mesenchyme components overexpress pro-angiogenic factors that contribute to the formation of aberrant vascular nets characterized by disorganization, immaturity and permeability that underpin the hypoxia and poor perfusion in TME [6, 7]. Hypoxia in turn exacerbates vascular aberrations while promoting the aggressiveness of tumor cells and counteracting the killing of lymphocytes, such as CD8+ T cells, etc. [8,9,10]. In addition, the distorted tumor vessels often impede drug delivery and compromise the response to irradiation [11,12,13]. Therefore, vasculature normalization is an important strategy to reduce the aggressiveness of tumor cells, as well as to re-sensitize them to treatments.

In the context of TME, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are cumulatively elevated in response to the combined stimulus of a hypoxic background and some other adverse stimuli, which are detrimental to treatment [14, 15]. In previous studies, we found that high doses of lipid-lowering drug simvastatin can improve ROS-dependent tumor vascular hyperpermeability in mouse models of lung cancer and melanoma [16]. In this study, we would further explore the specific mechanisms of ROS scavenging on tumor vasculature normalization and its potential targets.

Materials and methods

Cell line and cell culture

Lewis lung cancer (LLC), melanoma (B16F10) cells and Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA). B16F10 and LLC cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (HyClone, US) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone, US) and 100U/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (HyClone, US). HUVECs were sustained in endothelial cell medium (ECM; ScienCell, CA) adding EC growth supplements and 5% FBS. All cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

Animal tumor model

LLC (2 × 106) and B16F10 cells (2 × 105) were injected s.c. into the right flank of 8-weeks-old female C57BL/6 mice (Animal Care Committee of Wuhan university, Wuhan, China). Treatments were initiated when tumors reached a size of ~ 100 mm3. Animals were randomly selected to receive H2O2 (50nmol/kg/d, Sigma, US), H2O2 (12.5nmol/kg/d), 0.9% NaCl solution and DPI (1 mg/kg/d, Sigma, USA) for 5 days. Tumor-bearing mice were euthanized using 2% pentobarbital sodium and all animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (SYXK 2010-0057).

Immunofluorescence

Subcutaneously implanted LLC and B16F10 tumor tissues were harvested and immediately frozen with optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compounds (Sakura, Japan). Tumor sections (40 μm thick) were co-immunostained with goat anti-CD31 (1:50; Biotechnology, China) and mouse anti-α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (1:200; Google Biotechnology, China) antibodies, followed by Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-goat secondary antibody (1:300; Google Biotechnology, China) as well as FITC-conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:200; Google Biotechnology, China). Images were captured using a confocal microscope (Zeiss, Germany). The pericyte coverage index was calculated as the percentage of vessels positive for CD31 and α-SMA staining. All images were analyzed with Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, MD).

Fluorescein perfusion test

Perfusion of tumoral vessels was assessed by tail vein injection of 0.05 mg FITC-labeled lectin (1 mg/ml in 0.9%NaCl, Sigma, USA). After completion of fluorophores injection, it was necessary to allow 10 min of circling in mice, and then the tumors were harvested and immediately frozen in a dark environment by OCT compound. Tumor sections (40 μm) were prepared and incubated with goat anti-CD31 antibody (1:50) overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (1:200). The perfusion function of tumor vessels was determined by calculating the percentage of FITC-lectin+/CD31+ stained vessels.

Ultrasonography

The vascular perfusion signal within the tumor was assessed using a color Doppler flow imaging system of a 1–5 MHz probe (iU22 SonoCT, Philips, Netherlands). Tumor-bearing mice were anesthetized and placed on an electric heating plate at 37 °C. For selecting the region of interest (ROI), the blood flow signal was taken on the corresponding tumor sections and analyzed by QLAB quantitative technique. The amount and intensity of tumor vascular perfusion signals were assessed by vascularization index (VI) and vascularization flow index (VFI), respectively.

Cell counting Kit-8 assay

HUVECs were seeded at 8000 cells/well in 96-well plates and grown overnight with attached walls. The cells were treated with H2O2 at concentrations of 0, 50µM, 100µM, 250µM, 500µM, 1000µM, 2500µM, and 5000µM for 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h, respectively. Cholecystokinin-8 (Shangbo Biotechnology, China) was added to each well (10 ul per well) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm by using a scanning multi-well spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad Model 550, CA, United States).

The cell inhibition rate was calculated using the following formula: cell inhibition rate = [(OD control - OD experimental group) / OD control group] × 100%. Cells were treated with different concentrations of H2O2 and assayed at three time points, with each repeated thrice.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Human SPARC ELISA kits (Shenglong Biotechnology, China) were used to measure the amount of SPARC and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) in the medium of HUVECs. The experimental procedure was performed according to the instructions. The optical density (OD) was assayed at 450 nm using a scanning multi-well spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad Model 550, CA, US).

Gelatin zymography

HUVECs were seeded at 1.0 × 106 cells/well in 6-well plates and allowed to grow attached to the wall overnight. Cells were then incubated continuously with serum-free medium for 12 h, after which HUVECs were treated with 0 and 250µM of H2O2 for 24 h. Finally, the medium was collected and centrifuged. The BCA method was used to determine the protein concentration in the culture medium, which was used to adjust the amount of protein samples. APMA, 4-Aminophenylmercuric acetate, was selected as a positive control. The gel was subjected to two shaking elution for 20 min each, followed by two rinses of 20 min each with the rinse solution (Triton X-100 free in the eluent). Then it was put in the incubation solution on the shaker for 42 h. After 3 h of staining, the gels were dyed blue and then treated with 10% decolorizing solution for 0.5 and 1 h and 5% decolorizing solution for 2 h, respectively. Ultimately, the locations where the white and translucent bands appear were observed. All images were analyzed by Quantity One software (Media Cybernetics, MD).

Western-blot analysis

To detect the expression levels of SPARC, pY14-caveolin-1 and PDGF-BB in tumor tissues, equal quantities of protein extracts were loaded onto 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). After blocking with 5% casein/TBST, the membranes were incubated with rabbit anti-SPARC (1:100; CST, US), rabbit anti-pY14-caveolin-1 (1:50), and rabbit anti-PDGF-BB (1:200; Abcam, US). The mouse anti-β-actin (1:1,000; Google Biotechnology, China) antibody was used as the internal control. Protein blots were visualized using Super Signal Chemiluminescent kit (Google Biotechnology, China). The chemiluminescent signals on X-ray film were scanned and analyzed by AlphaEaseFC software (Innotech, US).

Electron microscope

Prior to electron microscopy assay, HUVECs were seeded at 1 × 106 cells/well in 6-well plates and grown overnight with adherent walls. Afterwards, the cell samples were treated with 0 and 250µM H2O2 for 30 min, respectively. Samples were collected and fixed with electron microscope stationary liquid, and stored at 4 °C for 3 days. Samples were washed three times with 0.1 M PBS, then soaked in a solution containing osmium tetroxide (1%) for 1 h, and then washed again with PBS. After a further staining in 1% aqueous uranyl acetate for 30 min, those samples were dehydrated and embedded in 50%, 70%, 90%, 100% ethanol and anhydrous acetone for 20 min, respectively. And then the cells were treated with a 1:1 volume mixture of anhydrous acetone and embedding agent and shaken for 2 h. Thereafter, the cells were treated with pure embedding agents and shaken for 2 h. The embedding agents were polymerized in an oven as the following conditions: 37 °C for 24 h, 45 °C for 24 h, and 60 °C for 48 h. A thin slice (120 nm) was made and the caveolae structure on the surface of HUVECs were observed by using transmission electron microscopy (80 kV, 15,000×; JEOL, Japan).

Co-localization

HUVECs sections were co-immunostained with rabbit anti-PY14-caveolin-1 (1:100) and goat anti-SPARC (1:100) antibodies, and then treated with Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:100) and FITC-conjugated donkey anti-goat secondary antibody (1:200). The co-immunostaining index of pY14-caveolin-1 and SPARC was estimated using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, MD).

FITC marked hr-SPARC

We use HOOK™ Dye Labeling Kit (FITC) (Sagan, China) to mark Human recombinant SPARC proteins (RnD, USA). Prior to labeling treatment, 100 µl of DMSO was added to the dye marker and mixed well. Then, the dye marker was mixed thoroughly with the protein solution and centrifuged, and the samples were collected from the bottom of the tube. Thereafter, those samples were wrapped in aluminum foil and incubated at room temperature for 60 min. Subsequently, we collected and purified the protein samples according to the detailed process instructions of the HOOK™ Dye Labeling Kit (FITC) and stored them for backup.

Internalized inhibition

HUVECs were seeded in 6-well plates at 1 × 106 cells/well and allowed to grow in adherent walls overnight, the culture medium was replaced with serum-free medium, followed by addition of 5 µg/ml FITC-SPARC. We then treated HUVECs with 250µM H2O2 and 5 µg/ml Filipin-III (Caveolae/caveolin-1 internalization pathway inhibitor; Cayman, China) for 1 h, respectively.

Statistical analysis

All measurements were repeated at least three times. Quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences between two groups were analyzed by Student’s t test (normally distributed data) or Mann-Whitney U test (non-normally distributed data). For comparisons across three or more treated groups, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were applied for normal distribution data and non-normal distribution data, respectively. All calculations were performed using SPSS Statistics software, version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). Statistical significance was set at a two-sided P < 0.05.

Results

ROS disrupts the vessel structure

Vascular endothelial cells and mature pericytes are important components of normal blood vessels; therefore, we first determined the status in vascular structures by detecting the expression of CD31, a marker of endothelial cells, and α-SMA, the marker of pericytes, at different ROS levels in LLC and B16F10 mouse models. We gave mice intraperitoneal H2O2 injections at different concentrations to simulate different intensities of the oxidative stress environment.

When the grafts grew uniformly to 100 mm3 (6 days for B16 and 8 days for LLC), the two types of mice were randomly grouped into control, low ROS (H2O2, 12.5 nmol/kg, once daily) and high ROS level (H2O2, 50 nmol/kg, once daily) groups, and DPI (diphenyleneiodonium) de-oxidation treated group (1 mg/kg, once daily). After 5 days of interventions, we collected the transplanted tumors for further detection. No death as well as an abnormal weight loss of the mice was observed during the course of intervention.

Compared to controls, a low proportion of α-SMA+/CD31+ vessels could be detected in the LLC xenograft model with either low or high H2O2 treatments. A significant recovery of those vessels occurred by DPI antioxidant treatments (Fig. 1A-B). Likewise, under the same conditions of H2O2 as well as a recovery method, a similar change of α-SMA+/CD31+ vessels could be observed in the model B16F10 (Fig. 1C-D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

In comparison with the control group, the density of vessels with normal structure was significantly reduced in LLC (A&B) and B16F10 (C&D) tumor tissues after H2O2 treatments (α-SMA+ vascular smooth muscle cell, green; CD31+ endothelial cells, red). Data presented were mean ± SD. By DPI treatment, a higher proportion of normal structured blood vessels could be observed. Differences among two H2O2-treated and DPI-treated groups were tested by ANOVA, with the * representing p values less than 0.05 and the *** representing p values less than 0.01

LLC: Lewis lung carcinoma cell line; B16F10: murine melanoma cell line; DPI: diphenyleneiodonium; ANOVA: analysis of variance

Full size image

ROS impairs vascular perfusion function

We took FITC-lectin tail vein injection to observe the perfusion function of vessels in both models under the oxidative stress background. In response to H2O2 (both low or high concentration backgrounds), the density of normally perfused vessels (indicating Lectin+/CD31+ staining) in LLC was markedly reduced as compared to controls, and those could be significantly elevated with DPI antioxidant treatment (Fig. 2A-B). We then adopted the same strategy for the validation in the B16F10 model, and observed a consistent change (Fig. 2C-D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Perfusion function of vessels within LLC (A&B) and B16F10 (C&D) tissues was significantly impaired after H2O2 treatment when compared to the controls (FITC-lectin+, green; CD31+ endothelial cells, red). Data presented were mean ± SD. After treating with DPI, the proportion of vessels with normal perfusion function was significantly increased (P < 0.01). Differences among two H2O2-treated and DPI-treated groups were tested by ANOVA, with the *** representing p values less than 0.01

LLC: Lewis lung carcinoma cell line; B16F10: murine melanoma cell line; DPI: diphenyleneiodonium; ANOVA: analysis of variance

Full size image

Furthermore, a color Doppler ultrasound method was performed to visually investigate the perfusion of tumoral vessels. As seen from Fig. 3A and C, for both LLC and B16F10, few blood flow signals could be detected within tumors relative to controls, in response to H2O2. After DPI treated, high levels of flow signal could be measured.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ultrasonography showed that VI and VFI within tumor tissues were significantly decreased after the H2O2 treatments when compared to the control group. After treating with DPI, the perfusion signals were significantly upregulated. The yellow arrow indicated the tumor areas; A&B figure was LLC model while C&D figure represented B16F10 model. Data presented were mean ± SD. Differences of VI and VFI among treatment groups were assessed by ANOVA, *** represents p- value less than 0.01

VI: vascularization index; VFI: vascularization flow index; LLC: Lewis lung carcinoma cell line; B16F10: murine melanoma cell line; ANOVA: analysis of variance

Full size image

The strength of the vascular signal could be quantified by VFI and VI. Accordingly, H2O2 decreased both VFI and VI in those two models, which, significantly, were improved by DPI antioxidant treatment, highlighting the negative role of oxidative stress on the vascular perfusions (Fig. 3B-D).

Combined with the results above, it is reasonable to assume that the impairment of vascular perfusion in conditions of H2O2 is mainly attributed to the abnormal recruitment of pericytes.

The role of SPARC under ROS conditions

As SPARC is thought to be an important regulator of pericyte recruitment [17, 18], we first attempted to investigate the potential role of SPARC in the context of ROS. Western-blot assay from LLC and BF16 tumors showed that SPARC protein would downregulate in the H2O2 environment when compared to the control group. After removal of ROS by DPI, the level of SPARC could be restored (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Western-blot showed the protein expression of SPARC was reduced in LLC and B16F10 tissues treated with H2O2 as compared to controls, while DPI treatment resulted in an up-regulation of SPARC (A); Cell inhibition rate of HUVECs at different treatment time points (30 min, 6 and 24 h) across a range of H2O2 intensities (B); ELISA demonstrated that SPARC of HUVECs decreased with the duration of H2O2 exposure (C); Western-blot showed a significant upregulation of intracellular SPARC in the presence of H2O2.

SPARC: secreted acidic and cysteine-rich protein; LLC: Lewis lung carcinoma cell line; B16F10: murine melanoma cell line; HUVEC: human umbilical vein endothelial cells; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Full size image

ROS decreases extracellular SPARC protein content in HUVEC

HUVECs are one of the most commonly applied models in vitro to characterize vascular biology. Through concentration-dependent experiments, we found that 250 µM H2O2 inhibited cells more stably at different time points and did not cause excessive cell death, hence determining it as the operating concentration, for in vitro experiments (Fig. 4B).

By ELISA, we observed a linear downregulation of extracellular SPARC with the duration of H2O2 intervention (Fig. 4C). However, the expression level of SPARC within HUVECs were significantly upregulated along with the treatment of H2O2 (Fig. 4D). The above results implied that the SPARC protein might have experienced a process of extracellular to intracellular translocation.

Mechanism of SPARC downregulation in the extracellular matrix of HUVEC under the ROS environment: a caveolae dependent endocytosis

It has been suggested that extracellular SPARC could be degraded by MMP-2 [19]; therefore, we assayed the quantification and activity of extracellular MMP-2 by ELISA and gelatin zymography assay (Fig. 5A&B), both of which were decreased upon H2O2 treatment, presuming that the extracellular downregulation of SPARC is not driven by the MMP-2 pathway.

Fig. 5
figure 5

ELISA showed that extracellular MMP-2 of HUVEC decreases with prolonged exposure to H2O2 (A); Gelatin zymography indicated that H2O2 caused diminished activity of MMP-2 (B); Electron microscopy observed that the caveolae-1 on the surface of HUVEC were more accessible to the intracellular compartment under the treatment of H2O2, the yellow arrows indicated the caveolae-1 (C). Western-blot showed that the expression of phosphorylated caveolin-1 within HUVEC was upregulated in response to H2O2 (D). The addition of filipin-III resulted in downregulation of SPARC protein within HUVECs compared to H2O2-treated group and control (E)

HUVECs: human umbilical vein endothelial cells; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; MMP-2: matrix metalloproteinase 2; SPARC: secreted acidic and cysteine-rich protein

Full size image

Caveolae are bottle-shaped invaginated molecules presented in the plasma membrane of many types of cell, and they are capable of participating in the transport of many molecules across the membrane [20, 21].

Through membrane electron microscopy, we could observe the flask-shaped caveolae were precisely located on the surface of the cell membrane with its opening oriented towards extracellular matrix in the control group. Under the stimulation of H2O2, increasing number of caveolae internalized gradually and formed intact vesicle-like structures moving toward intracellular matrix (Fig. 5C). Moreover, Western-blot of HUVEC cells also showed that the corresponding phosphorylated Caveolin-1 protein levels were significantly upregulated under the H2O2 treatment (starting after 10 min and up to 24 h) (Fig. 5D). When adding Filipin-III to HUVECs, an inhibitor of caveolae internalization, it led to a significant reduction of intracellular SPARC (Fig. 5E).

By immunofluorescence co-localization of phosphorylated caveolin-1 and SPARC within HUVEC, we observed that SPARC endocytosed by pY14-caveolin-1 could be detected intracellularly after H2O2 treatment, further confirming the internalization effect of SPARC (Fig. 6A&B).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Intracellular co-localized expression of phosphorylated Caveolin-1 (red) and SPARC (green) was significantly increased in HUVECs in response to H2O2 treatment relative to the control group. Data presented were mean ± SD. Phosphorylated caveolin-1 and SPARC at different H2O2 treatment time points were compared by ANOVA, * represents p-value less than 0.05, *** represents p-value less than 0.01

HUVECs: human umbilical vein endothelial cells; SPARC: secreted acidic and cysteine-rich protein; ANOVA: analysis of variance

Full size image

Internalization effect of phosphorylation-activated Caveolin-1 on SPARC proteins in tumor tissues under ROS environment

We chose the B16F10 mouse models to verify the endocytosis of phosphorylated caveolin-1 on SPARC in vivo. We found that the expression of pY14-caveolin-1 and SPARC protein was highly overlapped in tumor tissues treated with H2O2. However, the co-localization of pY14-caveolin-1 with SPARC was significantly weakened when ROS was scavenged. (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Immunofluorescence co-localized expression of phosphorylated Caveolin-1 (red) and SPARC (green) in the B16F10 tissue under the treatment of H2O2.

B16F10: murine melanoma cell lines

Full size image

Discussion

In TME, ROS is capable of initiating multiple processes in tumorigenesis, including the regulation of angiogenesis [22], metastasis [23] and cell apoptosis [24], etc. In our study, using LLC and B16 models, we found that vascular structures and perfusion function within the tumors were compromised under H2O2 treatments. Through in vitro experiments, we further observed that the detrimental outcomes of ROS on tumor vascular normalization could be mediated through an endocytosis of the caveolin-1 on extracellular SPARC.

Abnormal neovascularization in TME plays an important role in tumorigenesis. First, tumor cells need enough blood to survive, and second, the massive proliferation of immature vessels provides the environment for invasion and metastasis. With an in-depth understanding of the angiogenic blockade, the anti-angiogenic mechanism consists less of simply inhibiting the growth of tumor vessels, but more of promoting the normalization of abnormal structures [25]. Preclinical studies had shown that targeting blockade of VEGF and its receptors, could facilitate normalization of tumor vasculature and remodeling of TME [26, 27]. Clinical studies confirmed that multiple blockers of VEGF in combination with conventional chemotherapy or in triple therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors would produce synergistic effects and provide survival benefits for multiple tumor types [28, 29].

In oxidative stress conditions, excess ROS are produced, damaging cellular proteins, lipids and DNA, leading to carcinogenesis. For example, H2O2 could oxidize prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 (PHD2) and lead to the stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), a protein that is essential for angiogenesis and cancer metastasis [30]. ROS can also promote the pancreatic cancer formation by activating NF-κB and upregulating EGFR proliferative signaling via protein kinase D1 [31]. In addition, ROS can also cause DNA damage, including single strand cleavage, point mutations, miscoding, abnormal amplification and activation of oncogenes [32]. In this study, we simulated the landscape of oxidative stress with exogenous H2O2 in both ex vivo and in vitro, and we found that under conditions of overexpressed ROS, the recruitment of pericytes to the vascular endothelium would be compromised, leading to an abnormal vascular architecture. Also, we observed an underlying H2O2 concentration-dependent decrease of perfusion, and thereby we postulated that vascular structural abnormalities caused by impairment of pericyte were one of the main contributors.

A growing body of evidence suggests that the oxidative stress process is closely associated with Caveolin-1 [33]. Reactive species produced under the oxidative stress could induce the Caveolin-1 expression and facilitate cell membrane internalization of target proteins, for example, In an ischemia-reperfusion model, oxidative stress can induce internalization of P-glycoprotein through phosphorylation of Caveolin-1, reducing its mediated cortisol efflux to the blood-brain barrier to mitigate neuronal injuries [34], Caveolin-1 also increases HDL biogenesis through internalization and degradation of ATP binding cassette transporter (ABCA1), which would be modulated by propanol oxidation products [35]. Caveolin-1 also exerts feedback regulation on the oxidative stress reactions in TME [36].

The pericytes are involved in angiogenesis and are essential for the development of a functional vascular network [37]. They are able to mobilize and migrate from established vessels to new ones through factors such as matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGF-BB). In TME, once pericytes are poorly mobilized, de novo vessels exhibit highly leaky and tortuous features. Targeted improvement of pericyte recruitment would improve the responsiveness to therapy.

SPARC is an extracellular calcium-binding glycoprotein that participates in a variety of cellular processes, including promoting inflammatory cell aging [38], regulating stromal cell differentiation [39], and increasing tumor cell invasion [40]. SPARC is also engaged in pericyte recruitment and neo-angiogenesis [17]. Herein, we observed that under oxidative stress conditions, extracellular SPARC was translocated into cells by membrane-bound protein caveolae-1. Furthermore, in the B16F10 tissue model, we also witnessed that endocytosis, suggesting that internalization of SPARC is a key mechanism of vascular dysfunction.

Next, we will investigate the structure and function of vessels under conditions of blocking or upregulating caveolin-1, and the corresponding SPARC expression, which would shed light on the role of the caveolin-SPARC pathway in tumor angiogenesis scenario.

Conclusion

In TME, high levels of oxidative stress increase endocytosis of SPARC by caveolin-1, leading to inadequate recruitment of pericytes and causing distortion of intertumoral vascular function (Fig. 8). Amending the high oxidative stress in TME or targeting caveolin-1 may induce vascular normalization and improve efficacy.

Fig. 8
figure 8

In response to oxidative stress, SPARC outside the endothelium enters intracellularly via endocytosis of caveolin-1, triggering defective recruitment of pericytes, structural aberrations followed by inadequate perfusion, hypoxic microenvironment, and hyperpermeability (Created with BioRender.com).

SPARC: secreted acidic and cysteine-rich protein

Full size image

Data Availability

The data used to support the results of this study are available through the Institutional Review Board and the authors

References

  1. Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1423–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hinshaw DC, Shevde LA. The Tumor Microenvironment innately modulates Cancer Progression. Cancer Res. 2019;79(18):4557–66. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3962. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vitale I, Manic G, Coussens LM, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Macrophages and metabolism in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cell Metab. 2019;30(1):36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.001. PMID: 31269428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu T, Dai Y. Tumor microenvironment and therapeutic response. Cancer Lett. 2017;387:61–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.043. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maacha S, Bhat AA, Jimenez L, Raza A, Haris M, Uddin S, et al. Extracellular vesicles-mediated intercellular communication: roles in the tumor microenvironment and anti-cancer drug resistance. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0965-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandler KB, Costello CE, Rahimi N. Glycosylation in the Tumor Microenvironment: implications for Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis. Cells. 2019;8(6):544. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8060544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson NM, Simon MC. The tumor microenvironment. Curr Biol. 2020;30(16):R921–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.081.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Qureshi-Baig K, Kuhn D, Viry E, Pozdeev VI, Schmitz M, Rodriguez F, et al. Hypoxia-induced autophagy drives colorectal cancer initiation and progression by activating the PRKC/PKC-EZR (ezrin) pathway. Autophagy. 2020;16(8):1436–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2019.1687213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suthen S, Lim CJ, Nguyen PHD, Dutertre CA, Lai HLH, Wasser M, et al. Hypoxia-driven immunosuppression by Treg and type-2 conventional dendritic cells in HCC. Hepatology. 2022;76(5):1329–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kopecka J, Salaroglio IC, Perez-Ruiz E, Sarmento-Ribeiro AB, Saponara S, De Las Rivas J, et al. Hypoxia as a driver of resistance to immunotherapy. Drug Resist Updat. 2021;59:100787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2021.100787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li GY, Zhang SJ, Xue D, Feng YQ, Li Y, Huang X, et al. Overcoming chemoresistance in non-angiogenic colorectal cancer by metformin via inhibiting endothelial apoptosis and vascular immaturity. J Pharm Anal. 2023;13(3):262–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2023.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghosh P, Mason RP, Liu L, Zhang L. Modulation of heme and tumor vascular oxygenation- a novel strategy for lung cancer therapy. Oncoscience. 2022;9:66–9. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.569.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang S, Zhou Y, Zou L, Chu L, Chu X, Ni J, et al. Low- dose apatinib promotes vascular normalization and hypoxia reduction and sensitizes radiotherapy in lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2023;12(4):4434–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayes JD, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Tew KD. Oxidative stress in Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;38(2):167–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.06.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirtonia A, Sethi G, Garg M. The multifaceted role of reactive oxygen species in tumorigenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(22):4459–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03536-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Y, Zhang S, Peng G, Yu J, Liu T, Meng R, et al. Endothelial NO synthase and reactive oxygen species mediated effect of simvastatin on vessel structure and function: pleiotropic and dose-dependent effect on tumor vascular stabilization. Int J Oncol. 2013;42(4):1325–36. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.1833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Avolio E, Mangialardi G, Slater SC, Alvino VV, Gu Y, Cathery W, et al. Secreted protein acidic and Cysteine Rich Matricellular protein is enriched in the Bioactive Fraction of the human vascular pericyte Secretome. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021;34(15):1151–64. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2019.7969.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rivera LB, Brekken RA. SPARC promotes pericyte recruitment via inhibition of endoglin-dependent TGF-β1 activity. J Cell Biol. 2011;193(7):1305–19. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201011143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bao JM, Dang Q, Lin CJ, Lo UG, Feldkoren B, Dang A, et al. SPARC is a key mediator of TGF-β-induced renal cancer metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(3):1926–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.29975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Popov LD. Deciphering the relationship between caveolae-mediated intracellular transport and signalling events. Cell Signal. 2022;97:110399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2022.110399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiss AL. Caveolae and the regulation of endocytosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;729:14–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1222-9_2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li W, Xie L, Li QL, Xu QY, Lin LR, Liu LL, et al. Treponema pallidum membrane protein Tp47 promotes angiogenesis through ROS-induced autophagy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37(3):558–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xing Y, Wei X, Liu Y, Wang MM, Sui Z, Wang X, et al. Autophagy inhibition mediated by MCOLN1/TRPML1 suppresses cancer metastasis via regulating a ROS-driven TP53/p53 pathway. Autophagy. 2022;18(8):1932–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2021.2008752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuli HS, Kaur J, Vashishth K, Sak K, Sharma U, Choudhary R, et al. Molecular mechanisms behind ROS regulation in cancer: a balancing act between augmented tumorigenesis and cell apoptosis. Arch Toxicol. 2023;97(1):103–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03421-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. El Alaoui-Lasmaili K, Djermoune EH, Tylcz JB, Meng D, Plénat F, Thomas N, et al. A new algorithm for a better characterization and timing of the anti-VEGF vascular effect named “normalization. Angiogenesis. 2017;20(1):149–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-016-9536-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Park JA, Espinosa-Cotton M, Guo HF, Monette S, Cheung NV. Targeting tumor vasculature to improve antitumor activity of T cells armed ex vivo with T cell engaging bispecific antibody. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11(3):e006680. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-006680.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yadav K, Lim J, Choo J, Ow SGW, Wong A, Lee M, et al. Immunohistochemistry study of tumor vascular normalization and anti-angiogenic effects of sunitinib versus bevacizumab prior to dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022;192(1):131–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06470-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rini BI, Powles T, Atkins MB, Escudier B, McDermott DF, Suarez C, IMmotion151 Study Group, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (IMmotion151): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2404–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30723-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894–905. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Niecknig H, Tug S, Reyes BD, Kirsch M, Fandrey J, Berchner-Pfannschmidt U. Role of reactive oxygen species in the regulation of HIF-1 by prolyl hydroxylase 2 under mild hypoxia. Free Radic Res. 2012;46(6):705–17. https://doi.org/10.3109/10715762.2012.669041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liou GY, Döppler H, DelGiorno KE, Zhang L, Leitges M, Crawford HC, et al. Mutant KRas-Induced mitochondrial oxidative stress in Acinar cells Upregulates EGFR Signaling to drive formation of pancreatic precancerous lesions. Cell Rep. 2016;14(10):2325–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Srinivas US, Tan BWQ, Vellayappan BA, Jeyasekharan AD. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol. 2019;25:101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.101084.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Volonte D, Zou H, Bartholomew JN, Liu Z, Morel PA, Galbiati F. Oxidative stress-induced inhibition of Sirt1 by caveolin-1 promotes p53-dependent premature senescence and stimulates the secretion of interleukin 6 (IL-6). J Biol Chem. 2015;290(7):4202–14. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.598268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoshi Y, Uchida Y, Tachikawa M, Ohtsuki S, Couraud PO, Suzuki T, et al. Oxidative stress-induced activation of abl and src kinases rapidly induces P-glycoprotein internalization via phosphorylation of caveolin-1 on tyrosine-14, decreasing cortisol efflux at the blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40(2):420–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X18822801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lu R, Tsuboi T, Okumura-Noji K, Iwamoto N, Yokoyama S. Caveolin-1 facilitates internalization and degradation of ABCA1 and probucol oxidative products interfere with this reaction to increase HDL biogenesis. Atherosclerosis. 2016;253:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Codenotti S, Marampon F, Triggiani L, Bonù ML, Magrini SM, Ceccaroli P, et al. Caveolin-1 promotes radioresistance in rhabdomyosarcoma through increased oxidative stress protection and DNA repair. Cancer Lett. 2021;505:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2021.02.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dasen B, Pigeot S, Born GM, Verrier S, Rivero O, Dittrich PS, et al. T-cadherin is a novel regulator of pericyte function during angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2023;324(4):C821–36. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00326.2022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ryu S, Sidorov S, Ravussin E, Artyomov M, Iwasaki A, Wang A, et al. The matricellular protein SPARC induces inflammatory interferon-response in macrophages during aging. Immunity. 2022;55(9):1609–1626e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2022.07.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hatori T, Maeda T, Suzuki A, Takahashi K, Kato Y. SPARC is a decoy counterpart for c–Fos and is associated with osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells by inhibiting adipogenesis. Mol Med Rep. 2023;27(2):50. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2023.12937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Alcaraz LB, Mallavialle A, Mollevi C, Boissière-Michot F, Mansouri H, Simony-Lafontaine J, et al. SPARC in cancer-associated fibroblasts is an independent poor prognostic factor in non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and exhibits pro-tumor activity. Int J Cancer. 2023;152(6):1243–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34345. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Huan He for her advice on data understanding of this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Young Scientists Fund (Grant No. 81401900).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ye Zhao and Jing Yu authors contributed equally as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China

    Ye Zhao, Ai Huang, Qin Yang, Guiling Li & Yeshan Chen

  2. Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Ye Zhao, Ai Huang, Qin Yang, Guiling Li & Yeshan Chen

  3. Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Jing Yu

  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China

    Yong Yang

Authors
  1. Ye Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ai Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guiling Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yeshan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.Z: experiment performance and writing of articles; J.Y, A.H, Q.Y, G.L, Y.Y and Y.C: providing suggestions for revisions and review of the manuscript; J.Y, Y.Y and Y.C: conception the research, writing and revising this manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong Yang or Yeshan Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (SYXK 2010-0057).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Yu, J., Huang, A. et al. ROS impairs tumor vasculature normalization through an endocytosis effect of caveolae on extracellular SPARC. Cancer Cell Int 23, 152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-03003-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-03003-8

Keywords

Cancer Cell International

ISSN: 1475-2867

Contact us